True or False: after being served with a summons and a copy of the complaint, a defendant usually files a pleading known as an answer, briefly replying to each allegation in the complaint.

Out of the given choices, it may be said that a mugger steals the wallet, causing all the following except for increased glucose uptake to the liver from blood. Therefore, the option C holds true.

The condition of glucose uptake may also be taken into interpretation as the situation wherein the sugar levels of the body are transferred within the parts of the body itself, causing a change in the balance of their levels. When a mugger steals something, a person whose belongings have been stolen will not undergo an experience of an increase in the levels of his or her glucose uptake.

Learn more about glucose uptake here:

https://brainly.com/question/1245317

#SPJ4

D. You get off easier if you admit to it

Answer: Substantive Unconscionability

Explanation:

Substantive Unconscionability. Substantive unconscionability refers to when the terms of the contract are so one-sided that it is unfair to one party. The contract includes overly harsh and one-sided language, which means that it is likely to be found substantively unconscionable by a court.

If Maddie signs a cell phone agreement without being able to read the document, this is an example of an "illiteracy" issue.

Illiteracy is the inability to read or write, which can limit a person's ability to access and understand important information, such as legal documents, contracts, and other written agreements. In this scenario, Maddie may not fully understand the terms and conditions of the cell phone agreement that she is signing, which could potentially put her at a disadvantage or expose her to risks or obligations that she did not fully comprehend. This underscores the importance of promoting literacy and ensuring that people have access to education and resources that can help them understand and navigate complex legal and financial documents.

To know more about illiteracy click here:

brainly.com/question/28499076

#SPJ4

Employers must know and act in accordance with the legal rights of their employees or risk costly court cases is one of the 4 effects of legislation.

Legislation affects all areas of human resource management, from hiring to training of employees and other resources for the employees such as insurance and compensation. A employer must act in the limits of law by protecting the rights of its employees such as fair wages, insurance, and other prescribed important measures prescribed by the government for the welfare of the workers and protect them from exploitation. Any act that harms the rights of the employees can land the employers in court cases.

To know more about "Employers" visit-

brainly.com/question/29603057

#SPJ4

The California private notice is a control given to consumers to protect their personal information that businesses collect from them.

The notice was prescribed under the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), while controls the personal privacy of the consumers from the businesses collect. It gives various rights to the consumers such as right to delete personal information collected by a business, right to opt-out to share personal information as well as the right to non-discrimination from exercising above rights. Further through amendments two new provisions were also added the right to correct inaccurate user information, and the right to limit the use and disclosure of such information that carry personal information of the users. All the businesses are subject to such rights and the consumers can request exercise of these rights whenever needed.

To know more about "CCPA" visit-

brainly.com/question/28672983

#SPJ4

Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases because they can force the government to provide defendants with a lawyer. Hence, option A is correct.

Because he receives a shorter punishment for admitting to a lesser offense, the defendant may frequently benefit from the plea negotiation process. The public trial and its accompanying psychological suffering are spared the defendant, his family, and the victim.

Plea bargaining is frequently used for pragmatic purposes. Defendants can escape the time and expense of representing themselves in court, the possibility of receiving a heavier sentence, and the potential attention a trial could bring.

Thus, option A is correct.

For more information about plea bargaining beneficial to the defendant, click here

https://brainly.com/question/20125776

#SPJ9

The list of Gary Ridgway's spouses include Claudia Kraig; Marcia Winslow, and Judith Mawson.

Gary Ridgway has been highly remembered for being a serial killer from the United States. Apart from being a serial killer, Ridgway was also known for having married to as many as thrice during the span of his life. His first marriage took place in 1972, followed by the second and third in the years 1988 and 2001, respectively. The names of his three spouses have already been mentioned in chronological order.

Learn more about Gary Ridgway here:

https://brainly.com/question/30399292

#SPJ4

Complete question

Who were Gary Ridgway's spouses?

Always use low beam headlights within 350 feet when approaching or overtaking a bicyclist at night.

When you are within 500 feet (approximately one block) of an incoming car, use your low beams. When following another vehicle within 300 feet, use your low beams as well. If you are over the official speed limit, slow down as you approach a bend.

On high beam, headlights must illuminate people and objects for 350 feet and on low beam, for 100 feet. Low-beam headlights provide visibility up to 200 feet away and are ideal for speeds up to 25 mph. High-beam headlights allow you to see around 350 feet ahead and may be utilized at speeds of up to 25 miles per hour.

Learn more about low beam headlights

https://brainly.com/question/1035725

#SPJ4

True. The federal government has issued an executive order to advance racial fairness and support for underserved communities.

Executive Order 13985, titled "Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government," was signed by President Biden on January 20, 2021. It calls for a comprehensive strategy for the Federal Government to transform itself so that fairness and equity are not just ideals.

According to Executive Order 13985, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the assistant to the president for domestic policy must meet to develop a strategy for dealing with the following issues: any obstacles preventing underprivileged communities and individuals from enrolling in or using federal benefits, services, or programs; and any obstacles preventing full and equal participation.

Learn more about executive Visit: brainly.com/question/26909217

#SPJ4

The statement "In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence" is False.

In general, the burden of proof refers to the standard that a party attempting to demonstrate a fact in court must reach in order for that fact to be legally established. In various instances, different requirements apply.

In criminal trials, however, the prosecution is responsible for proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt rather than by preponderance of likelihood.

The preponderance of likelihood applies in civil cases where the plaintiff must prove more than half of the evidence and not all evidence.

To know more about trials

https://brainly.com/question/1807824

#SPJ4

In the condition given above, the concept that the attorneys are making an argument over is about jurisdiction.

The jurisdiction of any activity is the concept that defines the total scope or total extent up to which an authority has control over the undertaking of activities. For example, the jurisdiction for police is divided as per the departments of the individual cities. Moreover, the jurisdiction of the law is also helpful in determining the extent to which a thing may be done or abstained from being done.

Learn more about jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ4

The initiative was instituted by the government to eliminate fraud and abuse and recover overpayments and involves the use of Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs). Charts are audited to identify Medicare overpayments and underpayments. These entities are paid based on a percentage of the money they identify and collect on behalf of the government.

Hence the correct answer is Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs).

Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) are entities hired by the government to identify and recover overpayments in the Medicare program. They review medical charts and claims to identify improper payments and notify healthcare providers of overpayments. RACs are compensated based on a percentage of the improper payments they recover.

To learn more about Medicare Recovery Audit Contractors, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29999929

#SPJ4

There are various skills that "Marines learn in boot camp as part of their socialization into the Marnie Corps" such as how to carry and use equipment they have been issued, how to conform to rules about personal attire and personal areas and how to kill.

The marines are taught how to use the ammunition that they have been given and the correct way to operate them.

They are also taught to conform with the rules about the uniforms they wear and their respective duty area.

Most importantly, the marines are taught how to kill the enemies, using their ammunitions.

To know more about Marines here

https://brainly.com/question/30112838?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

An example of a concurrent power is the power to collect taxes.

Both the federal government and state governments have the authority to collect taxes from their citizens.

Concurrent powers are laid out in the United States Constitution, specifically in Article I, Section 8, which outlines the powers of Congress, and the Tenth Amendment, which states that any powers not given to the federal government are reserved for the states.

Other examples of concurrent powers include the power to regulate commerce, establish courts, and maintain law and order.

These powers are shared by both the national and state governments, but the Constitution gives ultimate authority to the federal government in case of a conflict between federal and state law.

To know more about concurrent power here:

https://brainly.com/question/2459928

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Hope it helps:)

The statement "A state law unconstitutionally burdens interstate commerce only when it violates a federal statute that was enacted under the Commerce Clause" is false.

The commerce is mentioned in the article 1, section 8 of the Constitution of united States that empowers the state to restrict or interfere in the matters of commerce. It is the duty of the congress to balance the commerce clause with states police powers, it should balance the merits and purposes of the regulations before burdening the interstate commerce. All the restrictions by the congress pursuant to the state police are presumed to be valid notwithstanding its effect on the commerce but if these law substantially interfere in the commerce clause it can be held unconstitutional.

To know more about "Commerce Clause" visit-

brainly.com/question/29973908

#SPJ4

Some areas where an officer's trauma can be an asset to a department are supporting staff development; creating a safe and supportive environment;  assessing needs and providing support; building social and emotional skills.

Trauma is an emotional response to a terrible event like an accident, or natural disaster. Immediately after the event, shock and denial are typical. Longer-term reactions include unpredictable emotions, flashbacks, strained relationships, and even physical symptoms like headaches or nausea. While these feelings are normal, some people have difficulty moving on with their lives.

Psychologists can help them find constructive ways of managing their emotions.

Learn more about trauma, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29869423

#SPJ1

Mahan's writings, particularly "The Influence of Sea Power Upon History," had a significant impact on American efforts to rise to the status of a superpower by arguing for the need for a strong navy and the control of

American naval commander and strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840 1914) wrote extensively on the significance of sea power in determining the direction of global history. The Influence of Sea Strength Upon History, Mahan's most well-known essay, made the case that a country's capacity to command the seas and project naval power was necessary for it to become a major player on the global stage. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, his theories profoundly influenced American foreign policy and military strategy, encouraging choices to create a contemporary fleet and conquer foreign lands. Mahan has had a lasting impression on naval history and strategy as a strategic thinker and

Learn more about Mahan's here:

https://brainly.com/question/11925808

#SPJ4

Political and Legal forces affect the way politics shape laws and the way laws shape the opportunities for and threats to an organization. For example, some cities in the United States (including New York and San Francisco) have set the minimum wage far above the federally mandated minimum wage

These forces come into play when different people have different views about the way an organisation should function. The organisations and businesses could not let them be affected by the political situation and let it not impact them before the law has changed.

To know more about businesses

https://brainly.com/question/28434924?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that each and every individual can openly carry their right to express themselves, and hold any opinion that they feel, as is seen under a democratic society.

The Human Rights is the most essential part of every constituency. The inclusion of articles of human rights becomes an indispensable aspect of the existence of any society. Under the same essence, freedom of opinion  and expression is one of the human rights provided under the article 19 of Universal Declaration.

Learn more about Human Rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/3444313

#SPJ4

The federal court must use the state's procedures for the choice of law in a diversity case.

The federal court, in this case, is in State A. In accordance with the conventional method of choosing the applicable law, the court would impose State B's legal system on the parties. The recent practice, meanwhile, is to use the law of the state that has the closest connection to the complaint. The jeweler in this instance is from State A, the importer could or might not be from State A, and the accident took place in State B.

The jeweler has no legal basis for a claim under State B tort law; State B is simply connected to the accident's location. On the other hand, because the jeweler is from State A, State A has a major connection to the action and the jeweler has a strong claim under State A's tort law. As a result, State A's tort law should be applied by the federal court in State A.

Learn more about jurisdiction of a trial court here:

https://brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ4

The duties of the National Security Council mainly include to advise the president on foreign policies and national security.

The National Security Act of 1947 created the National Security Council, and the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 later brought amendments to it.

The President's main body for coordinating the security based policies across federal agencies is the National Security Council. It serves as both the President's primary forum for decision-making on matters of national security and foreign policy with his or her senior national security advisors and cabinet officials.

In order to effectively coordinate domestic and foreign policies as well as traditional national security, economic security, health security, and environmental security, it is necessary to have a new and broader view of national security.

To know more about National Security Council, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2994510

#SPJ4

The qualifications for a presidency include that the person must be at least 35 years of age, and must a natural citizen of the United States, and must be an ordinary resident of the United States.

A person can be held as completely qualified for contesting the elections for the presidential position of the United States, if he or she has already attained the age of minimum 35 years, is of sound mind, and must be a completely natural-born citizen of America. Moreover, apart from the given conditions, the person must also be an ordinary resident to be held as qualified for presidency.

Learn more about presidency here:

https://brainly.com/question/2135948

#SPJ4

Roger Clinton, the half-brother of President Bill Clinton got the nickname “Headache” by the secret service.

Roger Clinton, notorious for his endeavors at influence-peddling and a conviction for cocaine use, got the nickname for obvious reasons.

“I don’t have a choice of being first brother,” he told The New York Times.

The Secret Service is a federal law enforcement agency that is responsible for protecting the President of the United States, among other duties. It is unlikely that they would use a disrespectful nickname for a sitting President.

It is possible that some Presidents have been given nicknames by the Secret Service as a way of referencing them during security operations, but these nicknames are typically not made public. Additionally, any such nickname would likely be chosen with respect and professionalism.

To know more about secret service here:

https://brainly.com/question/21516009

#SPJ4

28 U.S.C. 1391 is a federal law that defines the venue for civil suits in federal court. It states that the proper venue for a federal civil case is a judicial district in which the claim arose, where the defendant resides, or in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

It is a section of the United States Code that outlines the rules for determining the proper venue for a civil action in federal court. The section includes three subsections that address the different types of civil actions that may be brought in federal court:

- Subsection (a) addresses actions involving federal question jurisdiction.
- Subsection (b) addresses actions involving diversity jurisdiction.
- Subsection (c) addresses actions involving alienage jurisdiction.

Each subsection provides specific criteria for determining the proper venue for a civil action. For example, subsection (a) states that a civil action arising under federal law may be brought in the judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state, or in the judicial district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. Subsection (b) provides similar criteria for actions involving diversity jurisdiction, and subsection (c) provides criteria for actions involving alienage jurisdiction.

In general, 28 USC 1391 is designed to ensure that civil actions are brought in the most appropriate federal court, taking into account the convenience of the parties and witnesses, the interests of justice, and other relevant factors.

For more such questions on U.S.C.

https://brainly.com/question/28189378#

#SPJ11

All the justices of the U.S. supreme court are nominated by the president and appointment are made with the advice and consent of the senate.

The supreme court consists of a chief justice and other eight associate justices. The president with his power nominates the justices of the apex court however, the senate appoints the justices by giving a majoritarian consent. The supreme court being the apex court of justice in the United States reviews the working of lower courts and addresses various norms of the constitution. The judicial branch interprets the laws, applies laws on individuals, decides if laws are unconstitutional. The judiciary has one most important function to protect the individual rights of the people of the country.

To know more about "supreme court" visit-

brainly.com/question/224703

#SPJ4

Examples of expansionary monetary policy are lowering federal fund rate, easing, lowering reserves etc.

Expanding the money supply quickly or lowering short-term interest rates are two ways that expansionary monetary policy works. It is put into practise by central banks through interest rate control, margin requirements, and open market activities. The examples are -

Easing: Buying government bonds or other securities from banks and other financial institutions is another kind of quantitative easing that the Federal Reserve can utilize. This expands the money supply and lowers borrowing costs, which can promote lending and amplify economic activity.

Cutting the rate of federal funds: In order to boost economic activity, the Federal Reserve can reduce the federal funds rate, which is the ideal interest rate that banks typically charge each one for overnight loans. A decrease in rate lowers the cost of borrowing for banks, which can increase the amount of money available for loans to people and businesses and promote investment and expenditure.

Lowering the reserves: The Federal Reserve can lower the amount banks must keep in reserve as protection against depositors. Lowering the reserve requirement allows banks to lend out more money, which can boost the economy.

Read more about expansionary monetary policy on:

https://brainly.com/question/29982410

#SPJ4

The given statement "Today, social and economic regulations generally receive rational basis review when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection" is false because they are subject to intermediate scrutiny.

In India, social and economic regulations are generally subject to intermediate scrutiny when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection, not rational basis review. It requires that the regulation serve an important government interest and be substantially related to that interest.

This is a more rigorous standard of review than rational basis review, which requires only that the regulation have a rational relationship to a legitimate government interest.

The Constitution provides for equal protection under the law and prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, gender, or place of birth.

To know more about rational basis review here:

https://brainly.com/question/7383512

#SPJ4