In the above condition, it may be stated that “The Hebrews” was written by Paul with an intention to lay an emphasis on the superiority of Jesus Christ over the Old Covenant of Law. Therefore, the options 1-C and 2-C hold true.
''The Hebrews'' has always been remembered as the most accurate and relevant document for the governance of Christianity, and the religious ideologies that tend to revolve around the same. It may also be stated that the ''The Hebrews” is very much true to what it mentions and intends to portray to its readers in a large part.
Learn more about ''The Hebrews'' here:
https://brainly.com/question/842535
#SPJ4
Answer: Answer is below <3
Explanation:
The writer of the Hebrews is Paul.
The book of Hebrews was written to emphasize the superiority of Jesus Christ over the Old Covenant of Law.
true/false. a system of federalism in which state and national powers are neatly divided between the national and state governments. most powers of the national government are not shared with the states, and most powers of the states are not shared with the national government.
The given statement "a system of federalism in which state and national powers are neatly divided between the national and state governments. most powers of the national government are not shared with the states, and most powers of the states are not shared with the national government'' is true.
In a federal system of government the powers are distributed between the union and the state, while in a unitary system the powers are concentrated in the union only no powers were given to the states. Federal state organizes the distribution of powers and responsibilities in between the union and the state. The federal nature of U.S. government is conferred and protected by the constitution itself. The government at the union looks after the governance of the union or entire nation and the state looks after the law and order of the state.
To know more about "federalism " visit-
brainly.com/question/1951874
#SPJ4
n jurisdictions in which a grand jury is used, police officers may be called upon to do which of the following?
In jurisdictions where a grand jury is used, police officers may be called upon to provide testimony or evidence to the grand jury.
The grand jury has two basic duties in jurisdictions where they are used: investigation and indictment.
Grand juries are employed in some jurisdictions, primarily at the federal and state levels, to ensure that there is probable cause to charge a defendant with a crime. The grand jury functions in secret and is composed of persons who have been summoned to serve for a set amount of time. The grand jury serves as a check on the authority of prosecutors by determining whether there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime, rather than leaving that choice completely in the hands of the prosecutor.
For such more question on Jury:
https://brainly.com/question/30656396
#SPJ4
The following question may be like this:
In jurisdictions in which a grand jury is used, police officers may be called upon to do which of the following?
search the suspecttestify before the grand jurypresent charges before the grand juryguard the suspectthe basic speed law in california says that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility and traffic conditions.TrueFalse
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
What skills do Marines learn in boot camp as part of their socialization into the Marine Corps as a total institution?
- how to carry and use the equipment they have been issued
- how to conform to rules about personal attire and personal areas
- how to kill
There are various skills that "Marines learn in boot camp as part of their socialization into the Marnie Corps" such as how to carry and use equipment they have been issued, how to conform to rules about personal attire and personal areas and how to kill.
The marines are taught how to use the ammunition that they have been given and the correct way to operate them.
They are also taught to conform with the rules about the uniforms they wear and their respective duty area.
Most importantly, the marines are taught how to kill the enemies, using their ammunitions.
To know more about Marines here
https://brainly.com/question/30112838?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
a corporation ______ have a legal obligation to pay dividends.
A corporation does not have a legal obligation to pay dividends. However, depending on the company, dividends may be paid at the discretion of the board of directors.
Dividends are payments made to shareholders from a corporation's profits, but the decision to pay dividends is made by the corporation's board of directors. The board may choose to reinvest profits back into the company instead of paying dividends, or they may choose to pay dividends to shareholders. However, there is no legal obligation for a corporation to pay dividends.
For more such questions on corporation.
https://brainly.com/question/30029715#
#SPJ11
government powers that exist at both the national and state levels of government are called concurrent powers. which of these is an example of a concurrent power?
An example of a concurrent power is the power to collect taxes.
Both the federal government and state governments have the authority to collect taxes from their citizens.
Concurrent powers are laid out in the United States Constitution, specifically in Article I, Section 8, which outlines the powers of Congress, and the Tenth Amendment, which states that any powers not given to the federal government are reserved for the states.
Other examples of concurrent powers include the power to regulate commerce, establish courts, and maintain law and order.
These powers are shared by both the national and state governments, but the Constitution gives ultimate authority to the federal government in case of a conflict between federal and state law.
To know more about concurrent power here:
https://brainly.com/question/2459928
#SPJ4
what are the qualifications for the presidency
The qualifications for a presidency include that the person must be at least 35 years of age, and must a natural citizen of the United States, and must be an ordinary resident of the United States.
A person can be held as completely qualified for contesting the elections for the presidential position of the United States, if he or she has already attained the age of minimum 35 years, is of sound mind, and must be a completely natural-born citizen of America. Moreover, apart from the given conditions, the person must also be an ordinary resident to be held as qualified for presidency.
Learn more about presidency here:
https://brainly.com/question/2135948
#SPJ4
The next two questions are worth 20 points each. Your answer MUST be complete.
They must include: jail time, what happens to your license, fine money, any items
ordered by the court. You are the Judge:
13. The convicted person is a 30 year old man. This is his second conviction in
five years. What punishment must you hand down?
The convicted person is a 26 year old women. This is her fourth conviction
in five years. What punishment must you hand down?
what president was nicknamed headache by the secret service?
Roger Clinton, the half-brother of President Bill Clinton got the nickname “Headache” by the secret service.
Roger Clinton, notorious for his endeavors at influence-peddling and a conviction for cocaine use, got the nickname for obvious reasons.
“I don’t have a choice of being first brother,” he told The New York Times.
The Secret Service is a federal law enforcement agency that is responsible for protecting the President of the United States, among other duties. It is unlikely that they would use a disrespectful nickname for a sitting President.
It is possible that some Presidents have been given nicknames by the Secret Service as a way of referencing them during security operations, but these nicknames are typically not made public. Additionally, any such nickname would likely be chosen with respect and professionalism.
To know more about secret service here:
https://brainly.com/question/21516009
#SPJ4
In a criminal case, the state must prove its case bt a preponderance of the evidence
The statement "In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence" is False.
In general, the burden of proof refers to the standard that a party attempting to demonstrate a fact in court must reach in order for that fact to be legally established. In various instances, different requirements apply.
In criminal trials, however, the prosecution is responsible for proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt rather than by preponderance of likelihood.
The preponderance of likelihood applies in civil cases where the plaintiff must prove more than half of the evidence and not all evidence.
To know more about trials
https://brainly.com/question/1807824
#SPJ4
Today, social and economic regulations generally receive rational basis review when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection. True or False
The given statement "Today, social and economic regulations generally receive rational basis review when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection" is false because they are subject to intermediate scrutiny.
In India, social and economic regulations are generally subject to intermediate scrutiny when they are challenged on the grounds of equal protection, not rational basis review. It requires that the regulation serve an important government interest and be substantially related to that interest.
This is a more rigorous standard of review than rational basis review, which requires only that the regulation have a rational relationship to a legitimate government interest.
The Constitution provides for equal protection under the law and prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, gender, or place of birth.
To know more about rational basis review here:
https://brainly.com/question/7383512
#SPJ4
karmen enters into a contract that includes overly harsh and one-sided language. this agreement most likely involves which of the following? procedural unconscionability adhesion conscionability substantive unconscionability exculpatory clauses
Answer: Substantive Unconscionability
Explanation:
Substantive Unconscionability. Substantive unconscionability refers to when the terms of the contract are so one-sided that it is unfair to one party. The contract includes overly harsh and one-sided language, which means that it is likely to be found substantively unconscionable by a court.
the us constitution was created in order to strengthen the _____ government.
The US Constitution was created in order to strengthen the federal government.
The US Constitution was drafted in 1787 and adopted in 1789. It established the framework for the federal government, creating a system of separation of powers with three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.
The Constitution also defined the relationship between the federal government and the states and provided a mechanism for amending the Constitution as needed.
Prior to the adoption of the Constitution, the United States was governed by the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government that was unable to effectively address many of the nation's problems. The framers of the Constitution sought to create a stronger federal government that would be better able to provide for the common defense, regulate commerce, and promote the general welfare of the nation.
To know more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/28616537
#SPJ4
executive order on advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the federal government. true or false?
True. The federal government has issued an executive order to advance racial fairness and support for underserved communities.
Executive Order 13985, titled "Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government," was signed by President Biden on January 20, 2021. It calls for a comprehensive strategy for the Federal Government to transform itself so that fairness and equity are not just ideals.
According to Executive Order 13985, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the assistant to the president for domestic policy must meet to develop a strategy for dealing with the following issues: any obstacles preventing underprivileged communities and individuals from enrolling in or using federal benefits, services, or programs; and any obstacles preventing full and equal participation.
Learn more about executive Visit: brainly.com/question/26909217
#SPJ4
What are the duties of the National Security Council?
The duties of the National Security Council mainly include to advise the president on foreign policies and national security.
The National Security Act of 1947 created the National Security Council, and the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 later brought amendments to it.
The President's main body for coordinating the security based policies across federal agencies is the National Security Council. It serves as both the President's primary forum for decision-making on matters of national security and foreign policy with his or her senior national security advisors and cabinet officials.
In order to effectively coordinate domestic and foreign policies as well as traditional national security, economic security, health security, and environmental security, it is necessary to have a new and broader view of national security.
To know more about National Security Council, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2994510
#SPJ4
which branch of the government appoints justices to the u.s. supreme court?
All the justices of the U.S. supreme court are nominated by the president and appointment are made with the advice and consent of the senate.
The supreme court consists of a chief justice and other eight associate justices. The president with his power nominates the justices of the apex court however, the senate appoints the justices by giving a majoritarian consent. The supreme court being the apex court of justice in the United States reviews the working of lower courts and addresses various norms of the constitution. The judicial branch interprets the laws, applies laws on individuals, decides if laws are unconstitutional. The judiciary has one most important function to protect the individual rights of the people of the country.
To know more about "supreme court" visit-
brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4
who were gary ridgway spouse
The list of Gary Ridgway's spouses include Claudia Kraig; Marcia Winslow, and Judith Mawson.
Gary Ridgway has been highly remembered for being a serial killer from the United States. Apart from being a serial killer, Ridgway was also known for having married to as many as thrice during the span of his life. His first marriage took place in 1972, followed by the second and third in the years 1988 and 2001, respectively. The names of his three spouses have already been mentioned in chronological order.
Learn more about Gary Ridgway here:
https://brainly.com/question/30399292
#SPJ4
Complete question
Who were Gary Ridgway's spouses?
A jeweler brought a diversity action against an importer in federal court in State A. The jeweler's single count complaint seeks damages for injuries he suffered as a result of a car accident with the importer in State B. The jeweler does not have a viable claim under State B tort law, but he does have a viable claim under State A tort law.
What law applies and why?
The federal court must use the state's procedures for the choice of law in a diversity case.
The federal court, in this case, is in State A. In accordance with the conventional method of choosing the applicable law, the court would impose State B's legal system on the parties. The recent practice, meanwhile, is to use the law of the state that has the closest connection to the complaint. The jeweler in this instance is from State A, the importer could or might not be from State A, and the accident took place in State B.
The jeweler has no legal basis for a claim under State B tort law; State B is simply connected to the accident's location. On the other hand, because the jeweler is from State A, State A has a major connection to the action and the jeweler has a strong claim under State A's tort law. As a result, State A's tort law should be applied by the federal court in State A.
Learn more about jurisdiction of a trial court here:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Name some areas where an officers personal traumas can be an asset to a department
Some areas where an officer's trauma can be an asset to a department are supporting staff development; creating a safe and supportive environment; assessing needs and providing support; building social and emotional skills.
What is Trauma?Trauma is an emotional response to a terrible event like an accident, or natural disaster. Immediately after the event, shock and denial are typical. Longer-term reactions include unpredictable emotions, flashbacks, strained relationships, and even physical symptoms like headaches or nausea. While these feelings are normal, some people have difficulty moving on with their lives.
Psychologists can help them find constructive ways of managing their emotions.
Learn more about trauma, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29869423
#SPJ1
mahan’s books influenced u.s. efforts to become a world power primarily by —
Mahan's writings, particularly "The Influence of Sea Power Upon History," had a significant impact on American efforts to rise to the status of a superpower by arguing for the need for a strong navy and the control of
American naval commander and strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840 1914) wrote extensively on the significance of sea power in determining the direction of global history. The Influence of Sea Strength Upon History, Mahan's most well-known essay, made the case that a country's capacity to command the seas and project naval power was necessary for it to become a major player on the global stage. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, his theories profoundly influenced American foreign policy and military strategy, encouraging choices to create a contemporary fleet and conquer foreign lands. Mahan has had a lasting impression on naval history and strategy as a strategic thinker and
Learn more about Mahan's here:
https://brainly.com/question/11925808
#SPJ4
ricki is charged with a crime in a small town in michigan. ricki knows many people who live in the town due to its small size. rickiâs attorney argues that the case should be heard in a different town because the case will harm rickiâs reputation in this small town. the prosecuting attorney argues for the case to be heard in the small town in michigan. the concept the attorneys are arguing over is
In the condition given above, the concept that the attorneys are making an argument over is about jurisdiction.
The jurisdiction of any activity is the concept that defines the total scope or total extent up to which an authority has control over the undertaking of activities. For example, the jurisdiction for police is divided as per the departments of the individual cities. Moreover, the jurisdiction of the law is also helpful in determining the extent to which a thing may be done or abstained from being done.
Learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
39) A mugger steals your wallet causing all of the following to happen EXCEPT ________.A) increased rate and force of heartbeatB) inability to read close-up printC) increased glucose uptake to the liver from bloodD) increased metabolic rate
Out of the given choices, it may be said that a mugger steals the wallet, causing all the following except for increased glucose uptake to the liver from blood. Therefore, the option C holds true.
The condition of glucose uptake may also be taken into interpretation as the situation wherein the sugar levels of the body are transferred within the parts of the body itself, causing a change in the balance of their levels. When a mugger steals something, a person whose belongings have been stolen will not undergo an experience of an increase in the levels of his or her glucose uptake.
Learn more about glucose uptake here:
https://brainly.com/question/1245317
#SPJ4
what is definition post facto law ?
A post facto law is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences or status of actions that were committed before the law was enacted. In other words, it is a law that makes an action a crime or increases the punishment for an action that was legal when it was committed.
"Post facto" is a Latin phrase that means "after the fact." Post facto laws are widely seen as unjust and unconstitutional, as they contradict the fundamental fairness and rule of law principles.
Post facto legislation is prohibited by the United States Constitution for both the federal government and the states. Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution states that "no Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Statute shall be passed."
For such more question on law:
https://brainly.com/question/25368237
#SPJ4
always use low beam headlights within _____ feet when approaching or overtaking a bicyclist at night.
Always use low beam headlights within 350 feet when approaching or overtaking a bicyclist at night.
When you are within 500 feet (approximately one block) of an incoming car, use your low beams. When following another vehicle within 300 feet, use your low beams as well. If you are over the official speed limit, slow down as you approach a bend.
On high beam, headlights must illuminate people and objects for 350 feet and on low beam, for 100 feet. Low-beam headlights provide visibility up to 200 feet away and are ideal for speeds up to 25 mph. High-beam headlights allow you to see around 350 feet ahead and may be utilized at speeds of up to 25 miles per hour.
Learn more about low beam headlights
https://brainly.com/question/1035725
#SPJ4
Maddie cannot read. she signs a cell phone agreement without being able to read the document. this is an example of?
If Maddie signs a cell phone agreement without being able to read the document, this is an example of an "illiteracy" issue.
Illiteracy is the inability to read or write, which can limit a person's ability to access and understand important information, such as legal documents, contracts, and other written agreements. In this scenario, Maddie may not fully understand the terms and conditions of the cell phone agreement that she is signing, which could potentially put her at a disadvantage or expose her to risks or obligations that she did not fully comprehend. This underscores the importance of promoting literacy and ensuring that people have access to education and resources that can help them understand and navigate complex legal and financial documents.
To know more about illiteracy click here:
brainly.com/question/28499076
#SPJ4
What is the difference between a presidential executive order and legislation?
A legislation requires congressional approval and can be repealed by Congress, whereas an executive order does not.
The President of the United States or the Governor of a state can issue an executive order. The directives issued by the President concern the operation of the federal government. Governors frequently employ them in public health problems.
An executive order has the force of law, which means that breaking it may result in repercussions. Issuing an executive order is also lot faster than adopting legislation.
A law must be approved by Congress before it can be implemented at both the state and federal levels. Laws can be repealed by Congress, however executive orders cannot.
However, if Congress chooses to overturn an executive order, it can do so indirectly, for example, by cutting off money for enforcing the order.
To know more about executive order:
https://brainly.com/question/18973126
#SPJ4
Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases because they
can:
A. force the government to provide defendants with a lawyer.
B. allow a judge to decide on a verdict without a jury.
C. prevent the police from getting search warrants.
D. result in lighter penalties than being found guilty.
I need help!! apex quiz
D. You get off easier if you admit to it
Fill in the blank________ forces affect the way politics shape laws and the way laws shape the opportunities for and threats to an organization. For example, some cities in the United States (including New York and San Francisco) have set the minimum wage far above the federally mandated minimum wage
Political and Legal forces affect the way politics shape laws and the way laws shape the opportunities for and threats to an organization. For example, some cities in the United States (including New York and San Francisco) have set the minimum wage far above the federally mandated minimum wage
These forces come into play when different people have different views about the way an organisation should function. The organisations and businesses could not let them be affected by the political situation and let it not impact them before the law has changed.
To know more about businesses
https://brainly.com/question/28434924?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
A state law unconstitutionally burdens interstate commerce only when it violates a federal statute that was enacted under the Commerce Clause. True or False
The statement "A state law unconstitutionally burdens interstate commerce only when it violates a federal statute that was enacted under the Commerce Clause" is false.
The commerce is mentioned in the article 1, section 8 of the Constitution of united States that empowers the state to restrict or interfere in the matters of commerce. It is the duty of the congress to balance the commerce clause with states police powers, it should balance the merits and purposes of the regulations before burdening the interstate commerce. All the restrictions by the congress pursuant to the state police are presumed to be valid notwithstanding its effect on the commerce but if these law substantially interfere in the commerce clause it can be held unconstitutional.
To know more about "Commerce Clause" visit-
brainly.com/question/29973908
#SPJ4
employers must know and act in accordance with the legal rights of their employees or risk costly is one of?
Employers must know and act in accordance with the legal rights of their employees or risk costly court cases is one of the 4 effects of legislation.
Legislation affects all areas of human resource management, from hiring to training of employees and other resources for the employees such as insurance and compensation. A employer must act in the limits of law by protecting the rights of its employees such as fair wages, insurance, and other prescribed important measures prescribed by the government for the welfare of the workers and protect them from exploitation. Any act that harms the rights of the employees can land the employers in court cases.
To know more about "Employers" visit-
brainly.com/question/29603057
#SPJ4