Option B is correct - Because the states have powers reserved to them by the Constitution, the United States does not have a unitary form of government.
The US government relies on the federal system to run because it allows the federal government and the states to share power. This decentralised system's multiple levels of administration ensure that no level of government has excessive power and that each state is able to address issues particular to its own citizens.
The federal structure also offers a system of checks and balances, with each level of government acting as a check on the others. This will prevent the abuse of power and ensure that no individual or group has an undue influence on the decision-making process.
Learn more about " Constitution " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
TRUE OR FALSE trade dress can be any word, name, symbol, device, or combination of these used to identify a product.
It is highly appropriate and completely correct to state the fact that trade dress is a word, symbol, name, device, as well as any combination of these, which may be used specifically for the identification of a product. Therefore, the statement given above is to be held as true.
The Trade Dress can be easily taken into understanding as something that takes the procedure to identify the products in any way other than their original characteristics or features. Ideally, a trade dress consists of symbols, names, devices, or word, or any combinations of these for the purpose given thereunder.
Learn more about a trade dress here:
https://brainly.com/question/28098520
#SPJ4
what is article 2 of the constitution summary?
Article 2 of the United States Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government, including the roles and responsibilities of the President of the United States.
Article 2's key provisions are as follows:
Section 1 outlines the requirements and method for selecting the President and Vice President.
Section 2 covers the President's responsibilities and duties, including the authority to serve as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.
Section 3 mandates that the President deliver an annual State of the Union address to Congress and gives the President the authority to summon both houses.
Section 4 lays out the processes for removing the President and other officials from office in the event of impeachment or conviction for "high crimes and misdemeanours."
For such more question on Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Some people believe that COPPA requirements violate freedom of speech without censorship guaranteed by the. Amendment. a. Fourth b. Seventh c. First d. Second.
Some people believe that COPPA requirements violate freedom of speech without censorship guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment.
The correct option is B
A U.S. statute called COPPA is designed to safeguard children's online privacy from the dynamic nature of the internet.
The legislation, which took effect on April 21, 2000, relates to the online gathering of personal data about children under the age of 13 by persons or companies subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including children outside the U.S. if the website or service is headquartered there.
It outlines what a website operator must include in a privacy policy, when and how to obtain verifiable consent from a parent or legal guardian.
It also mentions what duties an operator has to protect children's privacy and safety online, including limitations on marketing to those under the age of 13.
To know more about COPPA requirements, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13097216
#SPJ4
True or false statment, a contract entered into by an intoxicated person is never valid.
A contract entered into by an intoxicated person is never valid the statement is false.
A contract entered into by an intoxicated person is a valid contract.
Even though a person was under the effect of alcohol or drugs (intoxicated) when entering into a contract, the law recognizes that the contract can still be valid. A person cannot invoke his or her own “negligence” or “recklessness” to negate their legal obligation under a contract.
Although,When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
1.The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
2.The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
To know more about "contract" visit-
brainly.com/question/7461134
#SPJ4
which amendment to the constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to all citizens?
The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are found in the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
What is 14th Amendment: Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses?One of the most significant constitutional amendments in American history is the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was ratified in 1868. To guarantee that newly freed slaves received the rights and protections given to them as citizens, it was passed after the Civil War. Since then, the amendment has been construed to provide protections to all citizens, irrespective of their color, gender, or other personal traits.
The 14th Amendment's Section 1 contains the Due Process Clause, which safeguards people from the government's capricious or unfair actions. No state may "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," it says. The Due Process Clause has been interpreted to protect both procedural due process—which calls for the government to follow fair and reasonable procedures when taking away someone's life, liberty, or property—and substantive due process, which shields some fundamental rights, like the right to privacy, from infringement by the government.
To know more about 14th Amendment: Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15085069
#SPJ4
Common law is a body of cases decided by legislatures.
No, it is absolutely incorrect to be mentioning the fact that common law is a body of cases decides upon by the legislatures. So, the given statement is false.
The Common Law may be generally taken into interpretation as the decisions that have been taken by the judges while making an understanding a statutory provision, or any such legal sources, which are then relied on by the other judges, and such laws continue to hold a greater degree of precedence. Thus, the above-mentioned statement is not true at all.
Learn more about common law here:
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4
Complete question
Assume the above question as a TRUE/FALSE question
Common law is a body of cases decided by legislatures.
What is the main theme of Crime and Punishment?
The main theme of Crime and Punishment is morality and the struggles of a young man trying to live in an immoral world. He struggles to reconcile his beliefs of what is morally right and wrong with the realities of the world he lives in. His ultimate realization is that he must take responsibility for his own actions, no matter the consequences.
The main theme of Crime and Punishment is guilt and redemption.
Throughout the novel, the protagonist, Raskolnikov, grapples with the guilt of committing a heinous crime and the consequences that come with it. He initially believes that he is above the law and can justify his actions, but as the story progresses, he realizes the weight of his guilt and seeks redemption.
This theme is explored through Raskolnikov's relationships with other characters, such as the prostitute Sonia, who represents the possibility of redemption through love and forgiveness, and the detective Porfiry, who represents the consequences of one's actions.
Overall, Crime and Punishment examines the complexities of guilt and the struggle for redemption in the face of one's own actions.
For more such questions on Punishment.
https://brainly.com/question/8801970#
#SPJ11
what was the primary purpose behind the 14th amendment, as stated in this excerpt?
To stop the Supreme Court from invalidating the Civil Rights Act, radical Republicans fought that was the primary purpose behind the 14th amendment.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which includes recently freed former slaves, was ratified on July 9, 1868, providing citizenship to "all individuals born or naturalised in the United States." Aside from that, it forbids states from "depriving any person within its jurisdiction of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" or from "denying to any person within its jurisdiction the same protection of the laws."
Because to its specific reference of the role of the states, the 14th Amendment, that is more frequently cited in the court decisions than any another amendment, considerably expanded the protection of civil rights for all the Americans.
Learn more about " 14th amendment, " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/12683660
#SPJ4
a woman was arrested, given miranda warnings, and questioned about an armed robbery. after she asked to speak with an attorney, the police stopped questioning her about the robbery. several hours later, the police
The police should have complied with the woman's request for counsel, hence the court should uphold the objection. A Miranda (5th Amendment) right to counsel may be exercised at any time before or during an incarcerated questioning.
In the event that the accused exercises this right, all questioning must stop until the accused either requests an attorney or starts new inquiries. As a result, it was improper for the police to question the woman about the robbery, and her remarks can be omitted.
A is erroneous. If an accused exercises their right to remain silent following Miranda warnings, the police cannot badger them. The police can rewarn the accused and then restart interrogation, according to court decisions, if they carefully adhere to the request.
Learn more about woman's attorney Visit: brainly.com/question/11347376
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
A woman was arrested, given Miranda warnings, and questioned about an armed robbery. After she asked to speak with an attorney, the police stopped questioning her about the robbery. Several hours later, the police gave the woman a fresh set of Miranda warnings and began to question her about a different robbery. She did not repeat her request for an attorney and instead made several incriminating statements about the robbery. At the woman's trial for the robbery for which she made incriminating statements, the prosecution seeks to have her statements introduced into evidence.
If the woman's attorney objects on appropriate grounds, the court should:
The color of a road sign is an indicator about what the sign stands for. what does a blue sign indicate?
The color of a road sign is an indicator about what the sign stands for. The blue sign indicates Motorist service.
In United States, road signs are standardized by the federal government, with the help of notably in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the Standard Highway Signs (SHS). These signs are adopted for easier transportation with safety. It ensures safe driving by various symbols and alerting the drivers with these signs. It involves various figure and colors for representation. Road signs includes various colors such as white, yellow, green, orange, coral and blue. Each color identify different function. Blue color denotes road user services. That helps the motorist to to access services through these signs.
To know more about " road sign" visit-
brainly.com/question/3016269
#SPJ4
a federal statute applies only to those states that agree to apply it within their borders. True/False
The statement that the federal statutes apply only to the states that tend to show an agreement towards applying them to the scope of their own boundaries is to be held as a completely false one.
The federal statutes may be taken into an easy understanding as the statutes that are put into effect by the federal government at the national level. However, the applicability of these statutes in individual states depends completely upon the discretion of the states in agreeing to the applicability of the same.
Learn more about federal statute here:
https://brainly.com/question/7582973
#SPJ4
a civilian from state a filed suit against a soldier from state b in federal court in state b, seeking $100,000 in damages for injuries resulting from a car accident that occurred on an army base in state b. state b tort law allows recovery only upon a showing of negligence. the soldier was on duty at the time of the accident and filed a motion to dismiss based on a federal common law tort defense that soldiers are not negligent for accidents occurring on military bases.
General points that may be helpful in examining the legal issues relevant in this case by the federal court are jurisdiction, liability, damages, etc.
Jurisdiction: The fact that the plaintiff is from state A and filed suit in federal court in state B means that the court will need to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the defendant, who is from state B. If the defendant is not subject to personal jurisdiction in state B, the case may need to be transferred to a different court.
Liability: The defendant, who is a soldier, may argue that he is not liable under federal common law because soldiers are not considered negligent for accidents occurring on military bases.
Whether this defense would be successful would depend on the specific circumstances of the accident and the applicable law. However, it is worth noting that federal common law is a relatively narrow area of law, and it is generally only applied in cases where there is no applicable state law.
Damages: Assuming the court determines that the defendant is liable, the plaintiff would need to prove that she suffered damages as a result of the accident. This could include medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
The fact that the defendant was on duty at the time of the accident could potentially limit the amount of damages the plaintiff can recover, as the defendant may be entitled to certain immunities or protections under the law.
Overall, this is a complex case that would require careful analysis of the relevant legal issues.
To know more about federal court here:
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ4
True or False: In the Memphis Police Department case study, predictive analytics helped to identify the best schedule for officers in order to pay the least overtime.
The given statement is False.
In the Memphis Police Department case study, predictive analytics helped to identify the best schedule for officers in order to pay the least overtime - False.
Predictive analytics were utilized in the Memphis Police Department case study to identify which officers were most likely to be engaged in a use of force event. The purpose was to use this information to provide further training and support to those officers in order to prevent similar occurrences from happening in the future. The case study makes no mention of employing predictive analytics to determine the ideal timetable for cops in order to avoid overtime costs.
For such more question on overtime:
https://brainly.com/question/29491095
#SPJ4
stin wants to file a suit against Mikayla. For a court to hear the case
a. Mikayla must agree.
b. the court must have jurisdiction.
c. the court must issue a deposition.
d. the parties must own property.
Answer:
B. the court must have jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
A law requires congressional approval and can be repealed by congress, which is not the case with an executive order. A new order would have to be created to eliminate an executive order that is in place, and once the governor leaves office, the executive orders are deemed invalid.
Executive orders is a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government, which have the force of law.
Executive orders are the directions given to a branch of government by the president of United States who manages the operations of federal government. Executive orders are sourced from the constitution or other sources that are not defying the provisions of the constitution. Executive orders are different from legislations, and no approval from congress or senate is required for such laws to pertain existence. These Executive orders nullify once the governor leaves the office, and the U.S. president may overturn an existing executive order by issuing another order. The senate or legislature do not play in the formation or nullification of these orders.
To know more about "Executive orders" visit-
brainly.com/question/19819409
#SPJ4
Does Mexico have environmental regulations?
Yes,Mexico have environmental regulations.Environmental regulations of Mexico helped to merge all states of Mexico.
It is generally vital to realize that Mexico's overall environmental laws is essentially not quite the same as that of the U.S. in additional ways than one.The U.S. follows a "customary regulation" framework and Mexico follows a "common regulation" framework. Customary regulation in the US can be followed back to its English roots, while Mexico's "respectful regulation" framework has parts that have been followed back to pre-Columbian native regulation. The importance between the two is that in Mexico, in contrast to the U.S. that perceives the choices of the court as making regulation, arrangements of the constitution outperform any regulation or guidelines, and regulation succeeds any guidelines.
Like the U.S., Mexico has a public bureaucratic arrangement of government and is comprised of 31 states, but Mexico's public government is given substantially more power than U.S. or then again Canadian public states are given. Mexico's leader starts practically all government regulations, which are passed with next to zero changes. Mexico's court framework has both state and government levels.
To know more about environmental regulations,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/21503102
#SPJ4
Is Genesis FS Card Services legitimate?
Yes, Genesis FS Card Services is a legitimate financial services provider. They offer services such as credit cards, checking and savings accounts, debit cards, and more. Their services are backed by a full FDIC insurance and are regulated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Furthermore, they are committed to upholding the highest standards of customer service and security.
It is a subsidiary of Genesis Financial Solutions, which has been providing consumer financing solutions to customers for over 20 years. Genesis FS Card Services offers a range of credit card products to customers with less-than-perfect credit, including the Indigo® Mastercard® and the Milestone® Gold Mastercard®. The company is headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon and is registered with the Better Business Bureau (BBB). While it is a legitimate company, it is always important to carefully read the terms and conditions of any credit card offer and to be aware of any fees or interest rates associated with the card.
For more such questions Genesis FS Card.
https://brainly.com/question/30399674#
#SPJ11
what kind of traffic sign is a red equilateral triangle pointing down?
The red equilateral triangle pointing down is yield.
A red equilateral triangle pointing down is a "yield" sign in traffic regulations. The yield sign indicates to drivers that they must slow down and give the right of way to other vehicles or pedestrians who have already entered the intersection or are approaching from another direction. Drivers must be prepared to stop if necessary, and proceed only when it is safe to do so. Yield signs are usually placed at intersections where there is a need to control traffic flow, such as where merging lanes or and pedestrian crossings are present.
For such more question on triangle:
https://brainly.com/question/16131731
#SPJ4
According to the Mail Fraud Act of 1990, which is an essential element to prove mail fraud?
- negligence
- absolute liability
- strict liability
- intent to defraud
In the essence of choices provided above, it may be stated that the intent to defraud a person is the most essential element to prove the mail fraud as per the Mail Fraud Act of 1990. Therefore, the option D holds true.
A fraud may be taken into legal interpretation as the act that makes people prey to the promise that they make, and the individual doing such act is involved in guilty intentions to defraud from the very beginning. In fact, the only thing that is essential to prove a fraud is the guilty mind intending of defrauding an individual.
Learn more about defraud intent here:
https://brainly.com/question/28199324
#SPJ4
when arne johnson case?
The Arne Johnson case, also known as the "Devil Made Me Do It" case, took place in 1981.
In 1981, the Arne Johnson case, popularly known as the "Satan Made Me Do It" case, occurred. In Brookfield, Connecticut, Arne Johnson was accused with the murder of his landlord, Alan Bono. Johnson's defence argued during his trial that he was not accountable for the murder because he was possessed by a demon at the time. This was the first recorded court case in US history to use demonic possession as a defence. Nonetheless, the defence was rejected by the jury, and Johnson was convicted guilty of first-degree manslaughter.
For such more question on case:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
You own a German Shepherd named Max who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering.To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the womanâs medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiffâs claim before trial?voir diremotion for a directed verdictdiscoverypretrial conference
In the above situation, it may be stated that the defendant will use discovery as the aspect for learning more regarding the claim made against him by the plaintiff before a trial. Therefore, the option C holds true.
A defendant may be regarded as the person who is under question while being heard in a trial in the court of law. Moreover, it is also to be interpreted that the plaintiff is the one who makes the charges against a defendant. In order to know more about the charges made against him, the defendant actually uses the procedure of discovery before ultimately moving into the trial.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/30736002
#SPJ4
Complete question
You own a German Shepherd named Max, who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering. To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the woman's medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.
What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiff's claim before trial?
A. Voir dire
B. motion for a directed verdict
C. discovery
D. pretrial conference
what did alexander hamilton and other federalists believe the new nation needed?
Alexander Hamilton and other federalists believe the new nation needed a federal system of governance in which contain weaker state governance and a stronger union.
The clashes of 1788 over ratification of the Constitution more than nine state conventions, Federalist supporters like alexander backed for a strong union and the adoption of the federal Constitution where as Anti-Federalists opposed the creation of a stronger national government and to decentralize the attention over Confederation, making it difficult for the union to take a control over states. The federal group was supported by big businesses, agencies, farmers, and local merchants in order to empower the union the control over state rule and order. These federalists favored a powerful union and a feeble state governments, and the officials to be elected for longer duration, they did not favored democracy. In a nutshell, they wanted the control of maximum power should be dedicated in the hands of the union so that it can regulate the state policies as well.
To know more about "Alexander Hamilton" visit-
brainly.com/question/4838420
#SPJ4
in a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.true or false
The given statement " In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence." is false because
One type of evidential basis utilized in an obligation to prove any claims examination is a vast majority of the proof.
The obligation to prove any claims is satisfied under the dominance guideline when the party with the weight shows the reality locater that there is an over half chance that the case is valid. In a common preliminary, this is the obligation to prove any claims.
In Karch v. Karch, 885 A.2d 535, the Predominant Court of Pennsylvania viewed that "the vast majority of the proof is characterized as the more prominent load of the proof, i.e., to steer a result somewhat is the measures or prerequisite for the greater part of the proof".
Learn more about preponderance of evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/15987790
#SPJ4
Question When approaching an intersection, bridge, or railroad crossing, you should never drive (pass) on the left half of the roadway when within:A.) 150 feet (One Hundred Fifty feet)B.) 200 feet (Two Hundred feet)C.) 100 feet (One Hundred feet)D.) 250 feet (Two Hundred Fifty
Out of the given preferences, it is to be assumed that one should never pass or drive on the left half of the road within a hundred feet (100 feet) when an intersection, bridge, or railroad crossing. Therefore, the option C holds true.
An intersection may be referred to or considered as the path on the road, wherein two different roads going in completely opposite directions meet or intersect each other at a point, which is usually the center of the roads. It is advised to keep a distance of at least a hundred feet while approaching such intersections.
Learn more about intersections here:
https://brainly.com/question/10480226
#SPJ4
You own a German Shepherd named Max who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering.
To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the woman’s medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.
What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiff’s claim before trial?
A. voir dire
B. motion for a directed verdict
C. discovery
D. pretrial conference
The defendant by the procedure of discovery of facts can learn more about a plaintiff’s claim before trial.
Hence, the correct option is C.
Discovery is a method of investigating facts used by the defendant to understand the claims of the plaintiff before the trial to protect themselves from such accusations. Through discovery method the summons and copy of complaint is provided to the defendant that the plaintiff can testify before the jury. It is the summary of facts as stated in the complaint. Such facts are used by defendant in his favor to protect is right of fair trail. There are various discovery method which a defendant can use such as Interrogatories method, oral depositions, document production etc.
To know more about "Discovery" visit-
brainly.com/question/14869445
#SPJ4
Officers usually record information on how the evidence was handled on the
evidence bags
search warrant
court order
intake form
which of the following standards organizations sets the standards that govern how much of the internet operates and develops and promotes voluntary internet standards, in particular the technical standards that comprise the internet protocol suite?
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) "sets the standards that govern how much of the internet operates and develops and promotes voluntary internet standards, in particular the technical standards that comprise the internet protocol suite"
The IETF consists of a vast number of working groups as well as some informal discussion groups, each of which deals with a specific issue. The organization was formerly funded by the US government, but it is currently administered by the nonprofit Internet Society Organization. Employers or other sponsors generally subsidise their work.
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is represented by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG), which includes a chair and region directors.
To know more about- Internet Engineering Steering Group
https://brainly.com/question/13308791
#SPJ4
The given incomplete, the complete question is:
which of the following standards organizations sets the standards that govern how much of the internet operates and develops and promotes voluntary internet standards, in particular the technical standards that comprise the internet protocol suite?
a)The Internet Engineering Task Force.
b) The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
c) Bothe and B
D) None
what is 1040 schedule c form ?
A tax form used by sole proprietors in the United States to submit their company revenue and expenditures to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is known as Schedule C, also known as the "Profit or Loss from Business" form, or 1040.
The total profit or loss of a company is determined using this form and is then declared on the owner's personal income tax return. The document requests specific information from the company owner regarding their operations, including gross receipts, cost of products supplied, and various business expenditures.
Individuals who are sole owners and who derive a net profit from their company of at least $400 must submit Schedule C along with their personal income tax return. It's important to keep in mind that Schedule C may not be necessary if a business is run as a partnership or corporation; instead, another tax form may be needed.
Learn more about the 1040 schedule C:
https://brainly.com/question/30160887
#SPJ4
the fair use rule of copyright law explains __________.
The fair use rule of copyright law explains when free use of copyrighted material is acceptable.
Fair use is a principle in US regulation that licenses restricted utilization of protected material without having to initially obtain consent from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limits to copyright expected to adjust the interests of copyright holders with the public premium in the more extensive dispersion and utilization of imaginative works by permitting as a guard to copyright encroachment guarantees specific restricted utilizes that could somehow be considered infringement.
Dissimilar to "fair managing" privileges that exist in many nations with an English lawful history, the fair utilize right is an overall exemption that applies to various sorts of purposes with a wide range of works and turns on an adaptable proportionality test that looks at the reason for the utilization, the sum utilized, and the effect available of the first work.
To know more about fair use,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/4999514
#SPJ4
you should always use your headlights any time conditions keep you from seeing _____ feet ahead.
you should always use your headlights any time conditions keep you from seeing 1,000 feet ahead .
When you can't see at least 1000 feet ahead, you must switch on your lights. When it is raining, use your low beam headlights. Remember that driving with only your parking lights on is always unlawful. In fog, snow, or severe rain, use low lights.
Conditions might prevent you from seeing 1,000 feet ahead at any time. Fog, severe weather, and dust are examples of these situations. Headlights should be switched on no later than 30 minutes after nightfall and kept on until 30 minutes before sunrise, as well as when traveling away from a rising or setting sun.
Learn more about headlights
https://brainly.com/question/24271025
#SPJ4