Singer argues that the example with Bob shows that we are sometimes required to make sacrifices for strangers. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Who was Peter Singer?Peter Albert David Singer AC is an Australian moral philosopher and Princeton University's Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics. He specializes in applied ethics and approaches the topic from a secular, utilitarian standpoint.
Singer argues in "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" that donating to poor people can mean the difference between life and death for children in need. He serves as an example for Bob, who has the opportunity to save a child's life but risks losing his valuable car.
Therefore, we are sometimes required to make sacrifices for strangers.
To learn more about Peter Singer, click here:
brainly.com/question/7394080
#SPJ1
Can you explain why you pick the answer you picked please you could do whichever one you want
Political parties, according to Schattschneider (1942:3), "invented" American democracy by involving the whole people in politics out of a "little experiment in republicanism."
Despite this accomplishment, Schattschneider bemoaned, political philosophers were silent on parties at the founding and even up until 150 years later.
1 Parties emerged when American democracy was still in its infancy, just as they have reemerged in every democracy on earth. The founders of the American republic attempted to construct structures in which parties and "factions" would wither. following normative theorists .
Learn more about Republicasim here
https://brainly.com/question/29630340
#SPJ1
The 1911 Chinese revolution ended the rule of the
F. Tweak At It. The Founders took what they knew from British government and tweaked it (and
other ideas) to reflect what they wished to see in a new government. Explain how each concept
changed from British to American government.
Representation
Icivic’s
The Constitution's framers, the Founding Fathers, aimed to create a system of government that forbade any one individual from wielding excessive power. While living under the British king's control, they discovered that this system might not be the best.
What is meant by excessive power?Excess Power is defined as the amount of energy and/or capacity in the PPLM Portfolio that is greater than what is necessary to fulfill PPLM's commitments under the current contracts and other wholesale agreements. This illness is characterized by a strong sense of self-importance and dominance, yet it can also be accompanied by feelings of inadequacy and weakness. In addition to having an exaggerated feeling of their own significance, attractiveness, success, and power, a person with this disease may also exhibit the following personality qualities.A megalomaniac is a pathological egotist, a person who exhibits psychological traits such grandiose beliefs and a fixation with power. People who act as though they are persuaded of their own unquestionable greatness and power are referred to more casually as megalomaniacs.To learn more about excessive power, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27606262
#SPJ1
what are three circumstances under which you would be dependent upon the "Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in several States"?
There are three circumstances under which you would be dependent upon the "Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in several States" are:
The fundamental rights of the life, liberty, and property missus.Discriminate against non-residents.The other are the not right to voting. What is Privileges?The term Privileges refers to the special right of the individual and the particular group. There was the special right and the law.
According to the "Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in several States" was the three circumstances are:
The most of the time are the missus the fundamental right. Discriminate against non-residents are not the belongs to this category. Right to voting is not for non-citizen.As a result, the significance of the privileges are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Privileges, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29731619
#SPJ1
(100 POINTS!) Use the excerpt from Huey P. Long's "Share Our Wealth" speech, given on March 12, 1935, to answer the question.
And they proceeded with the NRA. Everything from a peanut stand to a power house had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. If a peanut stand started to parch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. One slip and he went to jail. A little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule book. So they wrote their NRA rule book, codes, laws, etc. They got up over 900 of them. One would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. It would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail.
Analyze Huey Long’s criticism of the New Deal. Cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis.
According to Long Huey, the policies are complicating and they are also full of confusion as well
What is the criticism of the new deal?Huey Long criticizes the New Deal by attacking the National Recovery Administration (NRA) in his "Share Our Wealth" speech. He claims that the NRA's regulations are overly complicated and confusing, with over 900 rules and codes that are as thick as an unabridged dictionary and would require 40 lawyers to navigate.
He cites examples of small business owners being put in jail for minor infractions, such as a peanut stand operator who went to jail for parching a sack of peanuts and a little fellow who went to jail for charging 5 cents under the set price. This shows that Long views the New Deal as oppressive and harmful to small business owners.
Read more on Huey Long here:https://brainly.com/question/7038062
#SPJ1
Thomas Jefferson supported a government similar to our government today where power is given to a centralized government that governs for the hood of all people true or false
Thomas Jefferson did not supported a government similar to our government today where power is given to a centralized government that governs for the hood of all people. He was a Anti -Federalist.
Who was Thomas Jefferson?Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States from 1801 to 1809. He was an American statesman, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, and Founding Father.
Thomas Jefferson advocated for agrarian federalism, a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and strong state governance.
Thomas Jefferson feared that concentrating power would lead to a loss of individual and state rights. They despised Federalist monetary policies, believing that they favoured the upper class.
Therefore, the statement is false.
To learn more about Thomas Jefferson, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14242343
#SPJ1
Which statement would most likely be made by a woman during the late 19th
century?
"Immigrants who lack American values weaken our culture." is the statement would most likely be made by a woman during the late 19th century.
What responsibilities did women have in the late 19th century?Women were expected to preserve a housewife ideal in the 19th century. Women were supposed to take care of the housework, cooking, and childcare. In the 19th century women, they played a very different role than males did. Women were not given the same opportunities as men and were not permitted to speak up.
What rights did women have in the nineteenth century?In the nineteenth century, women had minimal rights. They were largely under their husbands' supervision, were not allowed to own property, were not allowed to vote, had no legal custody of their children, were not allowed to work outside the home.
To know more about 19th century women visit:
brainly.com/question/8860769
#SPJ1
The Singer Solution to World Poverty
To the objection that his ask is too demanding, Singer states:
A) if he can do it, you can do it
B) giving up all luxuries is not really much of a sacrifice
C) if everyone were to do their moral duty, it would not be very demanding at all
D) in some circumstances, doing the right thing is very hard
To the objection that his ask is too demanding, Singer states in some circumstances, doing the right thing is very hard. Thus, the correct answer is option D.
Who was Peter Singer?Peter Albert David Singer AC is an Australian moral philosopher and Princeton University's Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics. He specializes in applied ethics and approaches the topic from a secular, utilitarian standpoint.
Peter Singer, a contemporary philosopher, famously argues that if you're obligated to save a drowning child, you're also obligated to help save people dying from absolute poverty by donating to effective aid organisations.
Peter Singer contends that in some cases, doing the right thing is extremely difficult, and that we are in such a case.
Therefore, in some circumstances, doing the right thing is very hard.
To learn more about Peter Singer, click here:
brainly.com/question/7394080
#SPJ1
Which description is not correct regarding women's social and economic status in Europe
from 1500-1750?
During the period of 1500-1750, woman status and work were closely tied to that of their husbands and families because of their limited role in the community.
What were women's social and economic status in Europe from 1500-1750?1500 to 1750, women in Europe faced significant social and economic limitations. This period is commonly referred to as the early modern era and is characterized by the growth of European nations, the rise of commerce and industry, and the beginning of European expansion into other parts of the world.
Despite these significant changes, women's status remained largely unchanged. Women were considered second-class citizens and had limited rights and freedoms. Women were largely excluded from the workforce, and their role was primarily confined to household chores and caring for children.
Read more about woman status
brainly.com/question/20866054
#SPJ1
The Singer Solution to World Poverty
To the objection that the government, not us, needs to address world poverty, Singer states:
A) regardless of what the government does, we should rid ourselves of luxuries
B) we, not the government, are responsible for solving world poverty
C) the government will never be capable of solving world poverty
D) until the government does do this, we need to step in
To the objection that the government, not us, needs to address world poverty, Singer states until the government does do this, we need to step in. Thus, the correct answer is option D.
What is poverty?Poverty is defined as a person's lack of financial resources and essentials for a certain standard of living. Poverty can have a variety of social, economic, and political causes and consequences.
Singer argues in the essay that wealthy people have a moral obligation to donate a significant portion of their wealth to charities that can save lives all over the world.
Therefore, Singer states until the government does anything to eradicate poverty, we need to step in.
To learn more about poverty, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10850821
#SPJ1
Which European state did not maintain standing armies in early modern Europe?
Switzerland was the European state did not maintain standing armies in early modern Europe.
What is meant by a standing army?A standing army is a permanent, professional force that is maintained by a government in peacetime and is available for deployment in times of war or other emergencies.
It contrasts with a militia, which is typically composed of citizens who are called upon to serve in times of need, but are not maintained as a full-time military force.
Read more on army
https://brainly.com/question/829098
#SPJ1
Name one positive and one negative effect of preemption.
Preemption is a legal theory that gives a higher level of government the ability to restrict or even completely eliminate a lower level's ability to regulate a certain subject.
.
What is preemption ?Federal law has precedence over state and municipal law, according to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution. Similar to states, cities are "creatures of the state," and as such, state law usually prevails over local laws.
Preemption's effect on public health outcomes and health equity relies on how it is used, just like with any other tool. Although federal and state preemption rules can offer significant protections that benefit a large number of people, the current state-level preemption climate poses a serious threat to local decisions and public health.
Learn more about Preemption here
https://brainly.com/question/11991307
#SPJ1
3
Select the correct answer.
What is the purpose of creating an outline for a research paper?
Ο Α. to assess the validity of research sources
to think up topic ideas
O C.
to organize researched information
O D. to estimate the word count of the paper
OB.
The main purpose of creating an outline for a research paper is to organize researched information. The Option C is correct.
What are the importance of Research Outline?A research paper outline is a useful tool to aid in the writing process, providing a structure to follow and clearly organizing all information to be included in the paper. A research paper outline can also provide your teacher with an early preview of the finished product.
A good outline can help you write your research paper more efficiently by:
Organize your ideasRecognize the flow of information and the relationships between ideas.Make certain that nothing is overlooked.Read more about Research Outline
brainly.com/question/27514296
#SPJ1
Under what conditions do you think it is permissible for citizens to form a new government? What are some qualities that an ideal government should have? Why?
What are some qualities that an ideal government should have?
In summary, good governance relates to the political and institutional processes and outcomes necessary to achieve development goals. The true test of 'good' governance is the degree to which it delivers on the promise of human rights: civil, cultural, economic, political, and social rights.
Under what conditions do you think it is permissible for citizens to form a new government?
It is permissible for citizens to form a new government when the government is oppressive, takes away the people's rights, does not protect the people, as well as does not listen to the people's petitions or pleas.
why do you believe that federalism is important to our nation
Answer:
Because if we didn't have federalism then we could not deny the excess power to the government.
Explanation:
How did US government/political decisions impact the physical and/or mental health of the Apache?
The US government/political decisions impact the physical and/or mental health of the Apache is post-traumatic stress disorder.
What sort of lifestyle led an Apache?The buffalo served as the primary source of food for the nomadic Apache people. They traveled with the herds while living in tents made of oiled and tanned hides and using buffalo skins as clothing. They were among the first Native Americans to learn how to ride horses after the Pueblos.
In order to address mental health, the federal government works with the states in collaboration. The federal government has a responsibility to regulate mental health institutions and service providers, safeguard consumer rights, finance services, and promote research and innovation.
Learn more about decisions at:
https://brainly.com/question/26869005
#SPJ1
IDENTIFYING CAUSES What political and social factors likely contributed to Reich president
Hindenburg's motivations for issuing the emergency decrees?
The political and social factors likely contributed to Reich president Hindenburg's motivations for issuing the emergency decrees are:
Political instabilityCommunist threatEconomic hardship andPressure from conservative elitesWhat are these factors in details?Several factors likely contributed to President Hindenburg's decision to issue emergency decrees, including:
Political instability: Germany was facing political turmoil and the government was unable to maintain stability and control.
Communist threat: The rise of the Communist Party in Germany and the fear of a Bolshevik-style revolution led Hindenburg to believe that emergency measures were necessary to protect the nation.
Economic hardship: Germany was facing an economic crisis, including high inflation and mass unemployment, which was fueling social unrest.
Pressure from conservative elites: Hindenburg was under pressure from conservative politicians and military leaders who saw the emergency decrees as a necessary measure to restore order and stability.
These factors likely motivated Hindenburg to believe that emergency measures were necessary to protect Germany and its people, and motivated him to issue the emergency decrees.
learn more about President Hindenburg: https://brainly.com/question/719859
#SPJ1
which indian religion embraces the caste system?
A. Christianity
B. Hinduism
C. Aryanism
Answer:
Hinduism
Explanation:
Although it can be argued that all three have a caste system, the one embraced by Hinduism seems to be the one that's more well-known.
Hinduism Caste System
Brahmins (priests, teachers)
Kshatriyas (rulers, warriors)
Vaishyas (landowners, merchants)
Sudras (servants)
Dalits (the untouchables)
What material was the original Circus Maximus built with? What materials was the later Circus Maximus built with?
The material was the original Circus Maximus built with wood and sand
The materials the later Circus Maximus was built with are concrete and marble.
What is the material?Material is referred to elements or components that are used for the manufacturing or production of any object. For example, the raw materila for the production of cloth is thread.
Circus Maximus was first constructed of wood, but the Romans reconstructed it using concrete and marble after it had burned down a few times. It stood in for Rome's adversaries' broken bodies. Along with carrying a small knife, chariots wore knee, shoulder, and chest pads.
Learn more about Circus Maximus, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28883
#SPJ1
it is a temporary portion of land where the population can live
A temporary portion of land where the population can live is Arable land.
What is the population?The term "population" refers to the total number of people residing in a nation or specific area. Typically, the population will be determined based on the local living creatures. For instance, the United States has 329.5 million people as of 2020.
A consistent strategy of agricultural production is usually used to cultivate arable land. In order to grow crops, a piece of land must have sufficient soil nutrients. land that has lost its productivity and is being used for pasture or crop agricultural production.
Learn more about Population, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27991860
#SPJ1
Think about the examples of the federal government intervening in states issues given in this chapter. As a citizen, do you believe the federal government was justified in its actions? Why or why not? Give specific examples in your response.
The federal government of the United States is the national government of the United States, a federal republic located primarily in North America, composed of 50 states.
What is the meaning of Federal Government?The U.S. Constitution grants Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively, the authority to act as the federal government's legislative, executive, and judicial departments.
The federal government was established by the constitution and shares authority between a sizable central government and the municipal and regional governments.
Federal refers to the fact that there is a federal government and 50 state governments. A "republic" is a system of governance in which the people are the ultimate decision-makers but choose representatives to carry out their will.
Learn more about the Federal Government here:
https://brainly.com/question/11850953
#SPJ1
why do states accept federal grants with conditions attached?
Answer: States accept federal grants with conditions attached because they provide a source of funding for programs and initiatives that the states may not be able to afford on their own. Federal grants can be a valuable resource for states, as they can provide much-needed funds for education, infrastructure, health care, and other important areas.
However, in exchange for receiving these funds, states often have to agree to certain conditions, such as meeting certain performance standards, complying with specific regulations, or implementing specific policies. This is because the federal government wants to ensure that the funds are being used effectively and efficiently, and that the programs being funded are aligned with federal priorities and objectives.
Despite the conditions attached to these grants, states are still willing to accept them because the benefits of the funding outweigh the costs of complying with the conditions. The funds provided by federal grants can be used to improve important public services, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth, which are all important priorities for states. Additionally, the conditions attached to federal grants often provide states with guidance and support to help them achieve their goals and to improve the delivery of services to their residents.
Explanation:
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) made changes to market access for auto\mobile and agriculture products; rules on investment and intellectual property; and guidelines for labor and protecting the environment. New provisions regarding digital trade, state-owned businesses, and currency are also part of the USMCA.
In a well-developed essay, make an argument for or against the USMCA. Provide reasons and evidence to support your claim.
someone please help!!!!!
The new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will encourage trade that benefits all three countries, resulting in more open markets, equitable trade, and strong economic growth in North America.
How does the USMCA impact US Mexico and Canada?Trade has recovered from pre-covid levels under USMCA, increasing by an average of 6% across the region from 2019 to 2021. To put things in perspective, in 2021 a record 75% of imports from Canada and Mexico came from the US, making both nations the US's largest export destinations.
The USMCA encourages the use of electronic means for conducting government procurement, increasing transparency and efficiency for small and medium-sized businesses, and making it easier for American and Mexican SMEs to participate in those procurements.
Learn more about The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement here:
https://brainly.com/question/29818867
#SPJ1
2 thomas jefferson dealt with conflict at sea
The pirates raised the price of the tribute when Thomas Jefferson was elected president, and Jefferson refused to pay. Instead, he dispatched American warships to the Mediterranean Sea, where they ultimately started to assault the pirate strongholds.
What did Thomas Jefferson fight for?Jefferson, who valued strong state and local governments, co-founded the Democratic-Republican Party in the early 1790s to compete with Hamilton's Federalist Party, which sought a powerful central government with extensive economic control.
He decreased spending on the Army and Navy, the budget, and the whiskey tax that was so despised in the West, all while reducing the national debt by a third. Additionally, he dispatched a naval unit to combat Barbary pirates that were interfering with American trade in the Mediterranean.
Learn more about Thomas Jefferson, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14242343
#SPJ1
learning to use computer system is like learning to use a parachute
A parachute is a tool used to reduce the speed of a body traveling horizontally or to slow the vertical descent of a body falling through the air. The body's surface area grows as a result of the parachute, increasing air resistance, which slows the body's speed.
What is the role of the parachute?Your parachute allows you to drop more slowly because it increases air resistance, which reduces terminal velocity. Most parachutes are made to produce a lot of drag and let you land at a slow, secure pace. Today's parachutes may be used for a variety of purposes. The military uses a dome-shaped parachute for operations, which offers only minimal steering and is utilized to insert paratroopers and equipment.
A rectangle Ram-air parachute, on the other hand, is most frequently used by civilian jumpers. It is made of a number of tubular cells that expand when air is driven into each chamber. A curved, semi-rigid airfoil wing with improved performance and manoeuvrability is the end product.
Learn more about parachutes, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15093289
#SPJ1
What was the effect of these weapons on the people of Japan?
What are two possible reasons explain why world war 1 can be profitable?And what is one opportunity that arise from war that makes a country not powerful ? Explain why
Answer: War Production: During times of war, there is often an increase in demand for weapons, ammunition, and other military supplies, leading to increased production and profits for firms that specialize in war-related industries. Additionally, governments often place large orders for military equipment, providing a significant boost to the economies of countries engaged in the war effort.
Control of Natural Resources: Wars can also lead to the acquisition or control of valuable natural resources, such as oil, minerals, and farmland. Countries that emerge victorious in war may gain access to these resources, leading to increased economic power and prosperity.
Opportunities that arise from war that may not necessarily make a country more powerful include:
Infrastructure Development: Wars often lead to the development of new infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and communication networks, which can provide a boost to the economy. However, if a country is heavily damaged or destroyed by the war, the cost of rebuilding may outweigh the benefits of the new infrastructure. Additionally, the opportunity for infrastructure development may not be evenly distributed, leading to economic disparities and social unrest.
Explanation:
what was the treaty of vienna?
What power have modern Presidents used to take highly significant public policy actions without Congressional approval or a vote of the people?
Without the consent of Congress or a popular vote, modern presidents have used a variety of executive authorities to make extremely important public policy decisions.
Without the consent of Congress or a popular vote, what authority has a modern president utilized to make extremely important decisions in public policy?Executive orders are legally-binding directions that have the force of law, and presidents have the authority to issue them. The ability to declare a national emergency offers presidents certain tools to handle emergencies. Additionally, presidents have the authority to enact administrative measures that have legal consequences, such as drafting rules and regulations. As the head of the armed forces, the president has the authority to use military force, such as conducting airstrikes or sending troops overseas, without prior notification to Congress. modern Without the consent of Congress or a popular vote, presidents have taken a number of highly significant public policy decisions using a range of executive powers.
To know more about Executive authorities visit:
brainly.com/question/29620380
#SPJ1
Primary Source Analysis: Aristotle encouraged his student Alexander the Great in his conquests, telling him:
"Be a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians. Look after the former as after friends and relatives and deal with the latter as with beasts or plants."
6. From the reading, how did Aristotle believe a society should be best run? How does the above quote reveal some potential problems with his idea?
Aristotle believed that a society should be best run by having a leader who is held in high regard among the Greeks, but who is also able to exercise absolute power over foreign people or those seen as "barbarians".
What is Aristotle?Generally, This quote reveals some potential problems with his idea, as it implies that the leader should treat those from other cultures as if they were less than human, and this could lead to oppressive behavior and even violence.
It also implies that there is a clear distinction between "Greeks" and "barbarians" which could lead to ethnic or cultural divisions within society.
Read more about Aristotle
https://brainly.com/question/2083783
#SPJ1