The origin of the legal rules governing today’s hotel industry can be found in:

a.
The Greco-Roman Code.

b.
English Common Law.

c.
Early American Statutory Law.

d.
Decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Correct answer (c) Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangement (MEWA).

The Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangement (MEWA) is a procedure in which multiple employers collaborate with a specific association to provide health and welfare benefits to their employees. MEWA serves as the foundation for group healthcare coverage provided by association health plans. MEWA is essentially a unified health plan for multiple employers who negotiate health plans as a single entity.

The multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) is a unified system that provides health and welfare benefits to employers and their employees. MEWA is also known as the "multiple employer trust (MET)." Employers contribute to the plan based on the number of employees they have.

Learn more about Welfare

https://brainly.com/question/16596304

#SPJ4

Teens have less driving experience than any other age group, which contributes to their higher crash rates.

With approximately 55% of all motor vehicle collisions and over 9,000 fatalities each year, speeding is the second most frequent cause of traffic accidents in the United States.

The three most common factors in fatal collisions, according to new research, are speeding, poor seatbelt use, and distracted driving. According to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) research, 94 percent of car accidents are the result of driver mistake. Teenagers aged 16 to 19 have the highest risk of being involved in a car accident of any age group. Teen drivers in this age range have a fatal crash rate that is almost three times higher per mile travelled than drivers ages 20 and older.

To know more about NHTSA visit:                    brainly.com/question/11024150

#SPJ4

The process of deciding what issues will be decided and what problems will be addressed by government is known as agenda setting.

correct answer is c. agenda setting.

Agenda setting is a process of prioritizing certain issues and problems that need to be addressed and deciding on the order in which they should be tackled. This process helps to ensure that the most important issues and problems are addressed first, and that resources are allocated to the most pressing issues.

Once the agenda is set, the government can then decide how to implement the necessary policies to address the issues and problems that have been prioritized. Agenda setting is an important part of policy making as it helps to ensure that the government is focusing on the most important issues and allocating resources where they are needed most.

know more about agenda here

https://brainly.com/question/16926214#

#SPJ11

When a principal's authority isn't explicitly or implicitly provided, but rather appears to have been given, an agent has the ability to act on that principal's behalf.

Only if a third party can fairly conclude that the principal granted the agent such power based on the principal's actions does this power come into existence. When an officer of a firm receives a title, status, and benefits that lead to a misrepresentation about the extent of that officer's actual authority without safeguards in place, that is a common example of a problem concerning seeming authority. Without the principal's permission or understanding, this is authority. It only happens because of what is believed to be a representation the principal made to the TP to the following effect.

For more details about authority.  it, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28459817

#SPJ4

Answer:  Expanded dispatch, sometimes called the command center, is called upon when incidents reach a point where they are beyond the immediate capabilities of the dispatch center.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison, which is a significant case that established the power of judicial review (1803).

Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court had the authority to state parliamentary acts to be unconstitutional in this case.

The principle of judicial review was established by this decision, permitting the courts to evaluate whether the other branches of government's laws and other acts are constitutional.

The courts have the power to remove or invalidate laws that they find to be unconstitutional, by respecting the constitution and constitutionally required separation of powers.

This power is called as judicial review.

Learn more about judicial review:

https://brainly.com/question/28179489

#SPJ4

According to the Law of Definite Proportions, the elements are always combined by mass in the same ratios in a particular type of chemical composition. When elements are combined to create a single product, the Law of Definite Proportions is applicable.

Every chemical compound includes fixed and constant proportions (by mass) of each of its component components, according to the law of definite proportions.

The law of definite proportions asserts that when two or more elements combine to form a specific compound, they do so in defined proportions by mass. This is equivalent to arguing that a compound's composition is fixed. As an illustration, sodium chloride has a mass-based sodium content of 39.3%.

To know more about  Law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ4

Problem statements frequently contain three components: The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about. It should be exactly like the research question. It should be feasible.

A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement. 

The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.

Learn more about Problem statements

https://brainly.com/question/11657822

#SPJ4

Problem statements frequently contain three components:

A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement.

The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.

Learn more about Problem statements

brainly.com/question/11657822

#SPJ4

Answer:

Wrap it in plastic wrap.

Explanation:

The police officers who have the greatest amount of discretion are typically patrol officers, as they are often the first responder to calls for service and make decisions on the spot in the field. However, the level of discretion also varies depending on the specific jurisdiction, department policies, and individual circumstances. Higher-ranking officers, such as sergeants or detectives, may also have significant discretion in certain situations, while specialized units such as SWAT or internal affairs may have unique levels of discretion.

A greater grasp of the complexity of police work, an investigation into the use of discretion in officers' daily policing actions, and a clearer.

appreciation of the crucial role that community leaders play in the health of communities have all emerged over the past two decades. Famous criminologist George L. Kelling has worked as a practical police officer since the 1970s, collaborating on a daily basis with officers in various agencies across the nation and acting as an advisor to both large and small communities that are trying to find better ways to incorporate police work into the lives of their residents. This Research Report explains how an officer's delicate duty fits into the "broken windows" metaphor, which was put forth by James Q. Wilson and Dr. Kelling in 1982 in The Atlantic Monthly. The role of the police organization in maintaining public safety and preventing crime goes much beyond merely apprehending criminals. Police have historically exercised their authority in a variety of ways, frequently without making any arrests. Dr. Kelling is particularly interested in the application of judgment in the execution of the fundamental police power, the enforcement of the law.

Learn more about police here :

https://brainly.com/question/28198724

#SPJ4

These guarantees are known as civil rightsare protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights.

Civil rights are protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as freedom of speech and assembly, protection against discrimination, and the right to due process. They are designed to prevent government interference with fundamental rights and freedoms, especially those that are essential to a democratic society. Civil rights also provide a platform for citizens to express their opinions without fear of retribution or censorship, and to enjoy the same privileges regardless of their personal characteristics. Civil rights are essential for a democratic society to function, as they ensure that all citizens are treated equally and enjoy their inalienable rights.

Learn more about civil rights. here:

https://brainly.com/question/1142564

#SPJ4

One major reason for the law of demand is that people substitute relative lower-price goods for relative higher-priced goods . Option (C).

The law of demand is a fundamental principle in microeconomics that states that there is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded. In other words, "if all else is equal, as the price of a good rises , quantity demanded falls ; conversely, as the price of a good falls , quantity demanded rises ".

"When we say that a person's demand for anything increases, we mean that he will buy more of it than he would before at the same price, and that he will buy as much of it as before at a higher price," Alfred Marshall explained.

Learn more about law of demand

https://brainly.com/question/10782448

#SPJ4

Despite their significance, the author may suggest that we know very little about black string bands because of a lack of historical documentation and recognition.

Black string bands are musical groups that typically consist of string instruments, such as violins, banjos, and guitars. These bands originated in the 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States and were an important part of African American musical culture.

The history of black string bands and their music has often been overlooked and underrepresented in mainstream music history. This is due, in part, to systemic racism and discrimination, which has historically suppressed the contributions and cultural expressions of African Americans.

This has led to a lack of information about black string bands and their music, making it difficult to fully understand and appreciate their cultural significance.

To know more about black string bands refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19308324#

#SPJ11

The Anti-Federalists resisted the adoption of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed that the new national government would be overly powerful and harm individual liberties because there was no bill of rights.

When the Constitution was put forward for ratification in 1787, they did, however, agree to oppose it. The growth of governmental authority was opposed by the Anti-Federalists. In line with the Articles of Confederation, they supported small, locally focused governments with constrained national authority.

It was delayed in North Carolina and Rhode Island until the new administration was in place before the Constitution could be ratified. putting an end to their opposition in support of U.S. President George H.W. Bush's first term.

To know more about opposition of Constitution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29111726

#SPJ4

Only if those heirs remained unchanged  previous to her passing down, if you were listed as a devisee on an  subvention account or life- insurance account.

Suppose  veritably precisely before taking any legal action. Each case is unique, and the answer to this letter shouldn't be taken in lieu of legal advice. That said, if you were listed as a devisee on an  subvention account or life- insurance account, that would have trumped your  mama ’s last will and testament — but only if those heirs remained unchanged  previous to her passing down. Your  mama  would need to have been of sound mind. A person must understand what they're  subscribing when  subscribing a power of attorney — that is, she should have had  internal capacity, a term that refers to a person’s capability to  subscribe a document like this. She'd need to know why she was  subscribing it, what she was  subscribing, and what was at stake.

Learn more about law at

https://brainly.com/question/29727061

#SPJ4

The work of lister and ehrlich have in common is that both explored the use of chemicals in the prevention and treatment of infectious disease.

There were some significant similarities between Paul Ehrlich's and Joseph Lister's works.

For such more question on Ehrlich:

brainly.com/question/30490321

#SPJ4

Civil law subcategories, such as contract law, tort law, and property law, can have a significant impact on the healthcare industry.

Contract law affects the formation of agreements between healthcare providers, patients, and insurance companies. Tort law governs liability for medical malpractice and other forms of professional negligence. Property law governs ownership and control of medical records and other confidential health information.

These subcategories of civil law play a crucial role in determining the rights and obligations of various stakeholders in the healthcare industry and have a significant impact on the delivery and financing of healthcare services. They also affect the availability of compensation for individuals who have been harmed by medical errors or negligence.

In summary, Civil law subcategories have a significant impact on the legal framework that governs the healthcare industry, influencing the delivery and financing of healthcare services and determining the rights and obligations of various stakeholders.

To know more about Civil law click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14788507#

#SPJ11

Option d is the correct option.

After five years of settlement, the Homestead Act awarded legal ownership to 160-acre parcels of land.

The Homestead Act is what?

The Homestead Act was the U.S. statute that allowed applicants to become the legal owners of public or government land, sometimes known as a "homestead." In total, 1.6 million homesteaders had free access to more than 160 million acres, or 650 thousand km2 and 250 thousand sq mi, of public land, or roughly 10% of the entire area of the United States.

West of the Mississippi River was where most of the farms were located.

For such more question on Homestead Act

https://brainly.com/question/18126500

#SPJ4

The President Theodore Roosevelt felt that the building of the Panama Canal was a necessity for the United States to establish an expansion of American trade with the other parts of the world.

The former American President Theodore Roosevelt felt that there was a strong need to create a high strength navy in the United States. In an attempt to create a centralized control of military in the United States, he also stated that it became a necessity to build the Panama Canal, as it would also help in developing American trade by connecting it with other parts of the world.

Learn more about Roosevelt here:

https://brainly.com/question/29690956

#SPJ4

It is true that if you are convicted of attempting to elude a police officer your driver license will be suspended.In most of the states it's illegal to elude a police officer.

This means that if you are condemned of trying to escape from a police officer during a pursuit, your automobilist's license may be temporarily taken down. The length of the suspension depends on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.

It's a serious consequence that can have a significant impact on your capability to drive. So, it's true that your automobilist's license can be suspended if you are condemned of trying to elude a police officer.

To learn more about Attempt to elude police:

https://brainly.com/question/28580947

#SPJ4

The community era of policing began in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The community era of policing marked a shift in the approach to law enforcement.

During this era, police departments began to adopt community policing strategies, such as assigning police officers to specific neighborhoods, creating partnerships with community organizations, and engaging in problem-solving and preventative policing. The focus was on working with the community to identify and solve problems related to crime and disorder, rather than simply reacting to incidents after they occur.

The community era of policing represented a significant change in the approach to law enforcement and had a lasting impact on the way that police departments interact with their communities. Today, community policing remains an important aspect of law enforcement, with many police departments continuing to adopt and implement community policing strategies.

In conclusion, the community era of policing began in the late 1960s and early 1970s, marking a shift towards a more community-oriented and proactive approach to law enforcement.

Learn more about policing :

https://brainly.com/question/24655820

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:

The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.

Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.

Example:

Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.

Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.

To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.

If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.

In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.

I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.

Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.

It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.

Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.

Find out more about Search and Seizure on:

https://brainly.com/question/30280195

#SPJ1

Match each statement with the correct element of a contract.

This work of art is available for sale to the highest bidder - All rights reserved

We have understood the proposal and promise to deliver 20 boxes of paper. - offer

I have read the contract, and I will abide by all the terms - Acceptance

A contract is referred to as an agreement that is enforceable by law based on the consent of both the parties involved in the deal fulfilling all the elements of a valid contract.

A contract is created when a proposal is given by one party to another. when this offer is accepted by the particular party in exchange for something that abides by the law.

Learn more about Contract, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ1

The given statement is true.

Internal stakeholders are those who have a direct interest in a firm, such as through employment, administration, or investment. Various agencies are those who don't work for a company directly but are still impacted by its decisions and results.

People that have a "stake" in a situation are stakeholders by definition. In terms of an organization, stakeholders can be divided into those who may be "internal" (such as employees and management) and those who may be "external" 

Internal Stakeholders: They have voting rights and are a part of the company's management. They are both significant shareholders in the business and members of its board of executives. As a result, they possess all the authority enjoyed by other higher-level management.

Learn more about internal stakeholders here:

https://brainly.com/question/4414143

#SPJ4

For an organization to comply with both laws regarding information security, it is advisable to implement the following steps:

To read more about plans/policies, visit- https://brainly.com/question/14182169

#SPJ11

Jack, as a college student, should have policies in place to help him stay on track with his goals and maintain a balanced life. However, it is also important to review and adjust policies as necessary to align with his changing needs and circumstances.

Policies are an important aspect of any organization or individual's decision-making process. They serve as a guide for actions and decision-making, ensuring consistency and stability in the long term.

In terms of policies Jack should keep, he should maintain any policies that have helped him achieve his goals, maintain a healthy work-life balance, and prioritize his well-being. For example, if he has a policy of studying for a certain amount of time each day, this is a policy that should be kept in place.

There may be some policies Jack should cancel, such as ones that are no longer relevant or are hindering his progress. For example, if Jack has a policy of not socializing during the week, but this policy is preventing him from forming meaningful relationships, this policy should be cancelled.

Lastly, Jack should consider adding policies that align with his current goals and aspirations. For example, if he wants to improve his physical health, he may want to add a policy of going to the gym three times a week. Additionally, if he wants to improve his financial situation, he may want to add a policy of setting aside a certain amount of money each month for savings.

To learn more about policies here:

https://brainly.com/question/3006046#

#SPJ11

Cost-benefit analysis is a popular economic tool used to determine the economic feasibility of a project or policy by weighing the costs and benefits of an investment or decision.

One well-known example of cost-benefit analysis is the Ford Pinto case, where the company made a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was worth investing in a costly design change that would prevent the car from bursting into flames in a rear-end collision.

However, the Ford Pinto case raises questions about the ethics of cost-benefit analysis and its validity as a decision-making tool. Utilitarianism, as a moral philosophy, argues that actions should be based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

The Ford Pinto case highlights a potential flaw in cost-benefit analysis as it seems to prioritize monetary considerations over the well-being of individuals and society.

To read more about cost-benefit analysis, Visit- https://brainly.com/question/14556838

#SPJ11

No, m is not classified as mala prohibita. M is a type of criminal offense that is classified as mala in se, which means "wrong in itself".

This classification is used for offenses that are considered inherently wrong or evil, regardless of the laws or cultural norms of a particular society. M is considered mala in se because it involves taking someone's life, which is universally seen as a fundamental violation of human rights.

On the other hand, mala prohibita offenses are crimes that are considered wrong because they are prohibited by law, rather than being inherently immoral. Examples of mala prohibita offenses include traffic violations. These types of offenses are not necessarily seen as immoral in all cultures, but they are illegal because they are considered harmful or disruptive to society.

In summary, m is a mala in se offense, while mala prohibita offenses are those that are considered wrong only because they are illegal.

Learn more about human rights :

https://brainly.com/question/3444313

#SPJ4

It is completely inappropriate to be mentioning that the law of diminishing returns applies when the productivity increases when and as more variable inputs are added to the production. Thus, the given statement is false.

The returns of a business are the most crucial factors that determines the survival and financial position of the business. Moreover, the returns motivate the business to improve its productivity and earn higher revenues for the purpose. However, when the returns are diminishing, the amount of returns generated tend to decrease with an addition in inputs of production.

Learn more about returns here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961238

#SPJ4