the null hypothesis for a binomial test states that p = 1/5. what is the z-score for x = 29 in a sample of n = 100

Answers

Answer 1

Thus, the z-score for x = 29 in a sample of n = 100 is -1.5. This means that the observed proportion of successes in the sample is 1.5 standard deviations below the expected proportion under the null hypothesis.

A binomial test is used to determine whether an observed proportion of successes in a sample is significantly different from a hypothesized proportion of successes.

The null hypothesis for this test states that the proportion of successes is equal to a specific value, in this case, p = 1/5.

To find the z-score for x = 29 in a sample of n = 100, we first need to calculate the expected proportion of successes under the null hypothesis. This is equal to p = 1/5 = 0.2.

Next, we calculate the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample proportion, which is equal to sqrt(p*(1-p)/n) = sqrt(0.2*(1-0.2)/100) = 0.04.

The z-score is then calculated as (x - np) / √(np(1-p)), where x is the number of successes in the sample, n is the sample size, and p is the hypothesized proportion of successes.

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (29 - 100*0.2) / sqrt(100*0.2*0.8)
z = -1.5

The z-score for x = 29 in a sample of n = 100 is -1.5.

We would compare this z-score to a critical value based on the desired level of significance to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Know more about the binomial test

https://brainly.com/question/15278907

#SPJ11

Related Questions

Help ASAP algebra 1, simple question, need assistance

Answers

To calculate the total amount that must be paid back for a loan of $33,000 borrowed for 7 years at 6.5% interest, compounded annually, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:
A is the total amount to be paid back
P is the principal amount (initial loan amount) = $33,000
r is the annual interest rate (in decimal form) = 6.5% = 0.065
n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year = 1 (compounded annually)
t is the number of years = 7

Plugging in the values, we get:

A = $33,000(1 + 0.065/1)^(1*7)

A = $33,000(1 + 0.065)^7

Using a calculator, we can evaluate the expression inside the parentheses first:

(1 + 0.065) ≈ 1.065

Substituting this back into the formula, we have:

A ≈ $33,000(1.065)^7

A ≈ $33,000(1.504441)

Calculating further:

A ≈ $49,451.63

Rounding to the nearest dollar, the amount that must be paid back is approximately $49,452.

Answer:

$51282

Step-by-step explanation:

N = A (1 + increase) ^n

Where N is future amount, A is initial amount, increase is percentage increase/decrease, n is number of mins/hours/days/months/years.

for our question:

amount paid back = 33,000 (1.065)^7

= $51282 to nearest dollar

Scientists can measure the depths of craters on the moon by looking at photos of shadows. The length of the shadow cast by the edge of a crater is about 500 meters. The sun’s angle of elevation is 55°. Estimate the depth of the crater d?

Answers

To estimate the depth of the crater, we can use trigonometry and the concept of similar triangles.Let's consider a right triangle formed by the height of the crater (the depth we want to estimate), the length of the shadow, and the angle of elevation of the sun.

In this triangle:

The length of the shadow (adjacent side) is 500 meters.

The angle of elevation of the sun (opposite side) is 55°.

Using the trigonometric function tangent (tan), we can relate the angle of elevation to the height of the crater:

tan(55°) = height of crater / length of shadow

Rearranging the equation, we can solve for the height of the crater:

height of crater = tan(55°) * length of shadow

Substituting the given values:

height of crater = tan(55°) * 500 meters

Using a calculator, we can calculate the value of tan(55°), which is approximately 1.42815.

height of crater ≈ 1.42815 * 500 meters

height of crater ≈ 714.08 meters

Therefore, based on the given information, we can estimate that the depth of the crater is approximately 714.08 meters.

Learn more about trigonometry Visit : brainly.com/question/25618616

#SPJ11

Juan lives in a state where sales tax is 6%. This means you can find the total cost of an item, including tax, by using the expression c + 0. 06c, where c is the pre-tax price of the item. Use the expression to find the total cost of an item that has a pre-tax price of $72. 0

Answers

The total cost of an item that has a pre-tax price of $72 can be found as follows:

Step 1The percentage of tax on the item is 6% therefore, the decimal form of the percentage is 0.06

.Step 2The pre-tax price of the item is $72.0 therefore, we can represent it by the variable 'c'.Therefore, c = $72.0

Step 3The expression that can be used to find the total cost of an item, including tax, is given as follows:c + 0.06c

Step 4Substitute the value of 'c' in the expression c + 0.06c

= $72.0 + 0.06 × $72.0c + 0.06c

= $72.0 + $4.32c + 0.06c

= $76.32

Therefore, the total cost of an item that has a pre-tax price of $72.0 is $76.32.

To know more about cost estimate visit :-

https://brainly.in/question/40164367

#SPJ11

Suppose a recent health report states that the mean daily coffee consumption among American adult coffee drinkers is 3.1 cups. A nutritionist at a local university suspects that the mean daily coffee consumption among the student coffee drinkers at her university exceeds 3.1 cups. The nutritionist surveys a random selection of 28 student coffee drinkers and finds that the mean daily coffee consumption for the sample is 3.5 cups. She plans to run a one‑sample t‑test for a mean using this result.
Describe the claim that the nutritionist is trying to find evidence to support.
The mean daily coffee consumption among...
A) the student coffee drinkers at the local university is less than 3.1 cups.
B) American adult coffee drinkers is greater than 3.1 cups.
C) American adult coffee drinkers equals 3.1 cups.
D) the student coffee drinkers at the local university equals 3.5 cups.
E) the student coffee drinkers at the local university is greater than 3.1 cups

Answers

The claim that the nutritionist is trying to find evidence to support is that the mean daily coffee consumption among the student coffee drinkers exceeds 3.1 cups, which is option E.

The nutritionist's survey results suggest that the mean daily coffee consumption for the sample of student coffee drinkers is 3.5 cups, which is greater than the reported mean for American adult coffee drinkers.

The nutritionist wants to run a one-sample t-test for a mean to determine if the difference is statistically significant and provides evidence to support her suspicion that the mean daily coffee consumption among student coffee drinkers at her university is greater than the national average.

Therefore, correct answer is option E.

To know more about mean click on below

link :

https://brainly.com/question/12019147#

#SPJ11

Solve the following IVPs using Laplace transform: a. y' + 2y' + y = 0, y(0) = 2, y'(0) = 2.

Answers

The solution to the IVP is:

y(t) = 4e^(-t), y(0) = 2, y'(0) = 2.

To solve this IVP using Laplace transform, we first take the Laplace transform of both sides of the differential equation:

L{y' + 2y' + y} = L{0}

Using the linearity of the Laplace transform and the derivative property, we can simplify this to:

L{y'} + 2L{y} + L{y} = 0

Next, we use the Laplace transform of the derivative of y and simplify:

sY(s) - y(0) + 2sY(s) - y'(0) + Y(s) = 0

Substituting in the initial conditions y(0) = 2 and y'(0) = 2, we have:

sY(s) - 2 + 2sY(s) - 2 + Y(s) = 0

Simplifying this equation, we get:

(s + 1)Y(s) = 4

Dividing both sides by (s + 1), we get:

Y(s) = 4/(s + 1)

Now, we need to take the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution y(t):

y(t) = L^-1{4/(s + 1)}

Using the Laplace transform table, we know that L^-1{1/(s + a)} = e^(-at). Therefore,

y(t) = L^-1{4/(s + 1)} = 4e^(-t)

So the solution to the IVP is:

y(t) = 4e^(-t), y(0) = 2, y'(0) = 2.

Learn more about IVP here:

https://brainly.com/question/23864530

#SPJ11

A linear programming problem has been formulated as follows: Maximize 10 X1 20 X2 + X1 2 X2 < 100 2X1 X2 100 + X10, X2>=0 Which of the following represents the optimal solution to this problem? Select one: X2 50 a. X1 50 b. X1 50 X2 10 c. X1 100 X2 50 d. X1 50 X2 0 e. X1 0 X2 50

Answers

To determine the optimal solution to the given linear programming problem, we need to solve the problem and find the values of X1 and X2 that maximize the objective function while satisfying the constraints.

However, the problem formulation provided is incomplete and contains some errors. The objective function and constraints are not properly defined. It seems there are missing symbols and equations.

Without the correct formulation of the objective function and constraints, we cannot determine the optimal solution. Therefore, none of the options (a, b, c, d, e) can represent the optimal solution to the problem as presented.

Learn more about constraints here: brainly.com/question/32388315

#SPJ11

if ∫ b a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 2 − 6 f ( x ) d x ∫ 7 2 f ( x ) d x ∫ − 6 − 4 f ( x ) d x , what are the bounds of integration for the first integral?

Answers

The bounds of integration for the first integral are [2, 7].

We have,

The bounds of integration for an integral represent the range of values over which the variable of integration is being integrated.

In this case, the variable of integration is x.

So, we can write:

∫ b a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 2 − 6 f ( x ) d x ∫ 7 2 f ( x ) d x ∫ − 6 − 4 f ( x ) d x

To find the bounds of integration for the first integral, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation:

∫ b a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 2 − 6 f ( x ) d x ∫ 7 2 f ( x ) d x ∫ − 6 − 4 f ( x ) d x

∫ b a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 7 2 f ( x ) d x ∫ 2 − 6 f ( x ) d x ∫ − 6 − 4 f ( x ) d x

Now we can see that the bounds of integration for the first integral are from 7 to 2:

b = 7

a = 2

Therefore,

The bounds of integration for the first integral are [2, 7].

Learn more about integrations here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ1

An answering service staffed with one operator takes phone calls from patients for a clinic after hours. Patient phone calls arrive at a rate of 15 per hour. The interarrival time of the arrival process can be approximated with an exponential distribution. Patient phone calls can be processed at a rate of u 25 per hour. The processing time for the patient phone calls can also be approximated with an exponential distribution. Determine the probability that the operator is idle, i.e., no patient call is waiting or being answered.

Answers

The probability that the operator is idle is 0.4, or 40%. This means that the operator is idle 40% of the time and is available to answer calls.

To determine the probability that the operator is idle, we need to use the M/M/1 queuing model, where M stands for Markovian or Memoryless arrival and service time distributions, and 1 stands for one server.

The arrival process can be modeled with an exponential distribution with a rate of λ = 15 calls per hour. The service time can also be modeled with an exponential distribution with a rate of µ = 25 calls per hour.

Using the M/M/1 queuing model, we can calculate the utilization factor ρ as follows:

ρ = λ / µ

ρ = 15 / 25

ρ = 0.6

The utilization factor ρ represents the percentage of time that the server is busy. Therefore, the probability that the operator is idle, i.e., no patient call is waiting or being answered, can be calculated as follows:

P(0 customers in the system) = 1 - ρ

P(0 customers in the system) = 1 - 0.6

P(0 customers in the system) = 0.4

Therefore, the probability that the operator is idle is 0.4, or 40%. This means that the operator is idle 40% of the time and is available to answer calls.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

A professor had a volunteer consume 50 milligrams of caffeine on morning.

Answers

The residuals to the nearest tenth are 0.6, -0.7, 0.1, 0.8, and -0.4.

A scatter plot of the residuals is shown in the image below.

What is a residual value?

In Mathematics, a residual value is a difference between the measured (given, actual, or observed) value from a scatter plot and the predicted value from a scatter plot.

Mathematically, the residual value of a data set can be calculated by using this formula: