A landowner and the government agree upon a Habitat Conservation Plan before the landowner begins development of a subdivision. What law is the landowner complying with
The landowner is likely to comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by agreeing to a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) before beginning the development of a subdivision.
The Endangered Species Act is a federal law in the United States that aims to protect endangered and threatened species and their habitats. Under the ESA, it is illegal to harm, harass, or kill any endangered or threatened species or to destroy or modify their habitats. The law applies to both public and private lands.
To comply with the ESA, landowners may enter into an HCP with the government, which outlines the steps the landowner will take to minimize or mitigate the impact of their development on endangered or threatened species and their habitats. In exchange, the government may issue a permit allowing the landowner to proceed with their development.
HCPs are typically developed in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, which are responsible for enforcing the ESA. By entering into an HCP, the landowner can ensure compliance with the ESA while still being able to develop their land.
To learn more about Endangered Species Act, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/10415903
#SPJ4
What reason did the U.S. Supreme Court provide for authorizing a search of a motor home with probable cause, but no warrant, in California v Carney (1985)
The U.S. Supreme Court authorized a search of a motor home with probable cause, but no warrant, in California v Carney (1985) due to the mobility of the vehicle and the reduced expectation of privacy in such vehicles.
In California v Carney (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of a motor home was permissible under the Fourth Amendment's search and seizure clause.
The court determined that the motor home was highly mobile and readily capable of leaving the jurisdiction, and the reduced expectation of privacy in such vehicles justified the warrantless search. The court further stated that the reasonable expectation of privacy of individuals in motor homes is less than in a fixed dwelling.
The decision provided law enforcement officials with more latitude in conducting warrantless searches of vehicles, particularly those that are highly mobile.
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/224703#
#SPJ11
8. What is the fixed duration of RECLUSION PERPETUA and its retaining the nature of periods regardless of any mitigating or aggravating circumstances? Identiy the fixed Duration of penalty and its nature of indivisibility. ( 10 Points )
9. Raul premeditated killed Alfredo by shooting him with the used of Caliber .45 pistol an unlicensed firearm. What crimes did Raul committed? Is the penalty of unlicensed firearm can be used as aggravating circumstances only? ( 10 POINTS )
10. Marivic Catapang an accused was charged of Parricide by killing his Husband Boy Tamad, The former anchored her defense on the theory of Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) However, the court finds that accused used defense were not characterized by BWS as batterer did not created cycles of violence based on records. What constitutes why accused unabled to be exempted from criminal liability under Battered Woman Syndrome? Explain ( 10 Points)
Answer:
Explanation:
The fixed duration of reclusion perpetua is 40 years, and it retains the nature of periods regardless of any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Reclusion perpetua is a penalty of imprisonment for a period of 20 years and 1 day to 40 years.
Raul committed the crimes of murder and illegal possession of firearms. Murder is the unlawful killing of a person with malice aforethought, and the penalty for murder is reclusion perpetua to death. Illegal possession of firearms is a crime that carries a penalty of imprisonment ranging from 6 years and 1 day to 12 years.
The penalty for unlicensed firearms possession can be used as either a mitigating or aggravating circumstance, depending on the circumstances of the case. Mitigating circumstances can lower the penalty for a crime while aggravating circumstances can increase the penalty.
Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) can be used as a defence in cases of domestic violence where the defendant acted in self-defence. However, in Marivic Catapang's case, the court found that the defence of BWS was not applicable because the accused did not exhibit the characteristic cycle of violence that defines BWS.
To qualify for the defence of BWS, the accused must show that they have been subjected to a pattern of physical, sexual, or psychological abuse from their partner, resulting in learned helplessness and the belief that they cannot escape the abuse. If the accused does not meet the requirements for BWS, they cannot be exempted from criminal liability.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
An ex post facto law is Multiple Choice a criminal law that takes effect at some specified time in the future. a state criminal law that conflicts with a federal criminal law and is overruled by the federal law. a criminal law that is based on federal common law. a law that criminalizes an act that occurred before the law was enacted.
An ex post facto law is a law that criminalizes an act that occurred before the law was enacted. This type of law is generally considered unjust and is prohibited by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9 for federal laws, and in Article 1, Section 10 for state laws.
An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of an action, making it illegal or subject to a greater punishment than it was at the time it was committed. The term "ex post facto" comes from Latin and means "from a thing done afterward".Such laws are generally considered unconstitutional because they violate the principle of fair notice and the right to due process. The U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws in Article I, Section 9. This means that the government cannot pass a law that retroactively criminalizes conduct, increases the punishment for a crime after it has been committed, or deprives a person of a defense that was available at the time the crime was committed.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
Trial courts in the federal system are called: Trial courts in the federal system are called: U.S. Circuit Courts U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Courts of Appeals U.S. District Courts
Trial courts in the federal system are called U.S. District Courts. These courts are responsible for hearing cases that involve federal law or disputes between parties from different states.
The U.S. District Courts are the lowest level of federal courts, and they are located in different regions throughout the United States. When a decision from a U.S. District Court is appealed, it is sent to the U.S. Courts of Appeals, which are the intermediate level of the federal court system. The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest level of the federal court system and is responsible for hearing appeals from the U.S. Courts of Appeals and making final decisions on important legal issues.
Learn more about federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/16314718
#SPJ11
Partial performance is an exception to the statute of ______ in which the performance of portions of an unwritten agreement by one or both parties can constitute proof that an oral contract exists between the parties.
Partial performance is an exception to the statute of frauds in which the performance of portions of an unwritten agreement by one or both parties.
The statute of frauds requires certain contracts, such as contracts for the sale of land or contracts that cannot be performed within one year, to be in writing in order to be enforceable. However, if one party performs a part of the unwritten agreement, such as paying a deposit or starting work on a project, it may be evidence that there was a verbal agreement between the parties.
This exception to the statute of frauds is based on the idea that it would be unfair to allow a party to use the statute of frauds as a shield to avoid their obligations under an oral contract after having received the benefits of partial performance. However, partial performance must be unequivocally referable to the alleged contract, and the party seeking to enforce the contract must prove that there was an agreement and that it was breached by the other party.
In summary, partial performance is an important exception to the statute of frauds that allows for oral contracts to be enforced if there is evidence of partial performance by one or both parties. However, the requirements for invoking this exception can be difficult to meet and require a thorough understanding of contract law.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
In __________, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
In criminal law, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
This requirement stems from the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which guarantees defendants the right to a fair and impartial trial. In order for a guilty plea to be valid, the defendant must have a full understanding of the charges against them, the consequences of their plea, and the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. Additionally, the plea must not be the result of coercion or undue influence, such as promises of leniency or threats of harm.
The judge may conduct a colloquy with the defendant, which is a series of questions aimed at ensuring that the defendant is making a voluntary and informed decision to plead guilty. If the judge determines that the plea is not knowingly entered or completely voluntary, the plea may be withdrawn and the case may proceed to trial. Overall, the requirement that a guilty plea be knowingly entered and completely voluntary is an important safeguard in the criminal justice system, as it helps to ensure that defendants are not unfairly pressured into giving up their rights.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
Question 2 of 10
What role does the U.S. Constitution play in creating local governments?
A. It specifies the types of local governments that can be created by
the states.
B. It gives the states the authority to create any local governments
they need.
C. It gives the federal government the power to create any type of
local government.
OD. It requires that all local governments have constitutions based on
the federal document.
4
The role the U.S. Constitution play in creating local governments is It gives the states the authority to create any local governments they need. Option B
What is the role of the U.S. Constitution in creating local governmentsThe ability to establish local governments is delegated to each states by the United States Constitution. This means that each state has the ability to form and structure its own local governments in accordance with its state constitution and any applicable legislation.
The United States Constitution does not specify the structure or sorts of municipal governments that states may establish. Instead, it reserves all powers not expressly given to the federal government by the Constitution to the states.
Learn more about US constitution at https://brainly.com/question/27954283
#SPJ1
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.
The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.
The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.
The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.
To learn more about competency examinations, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31646918
#SPJ4
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________
Sometimes, in special situations, the entire circuit court's bench will sit together for a case. What is this called
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
Convicted criminals whose sentences increase during their prison term due to a change in the law have been illegally subjected to what kind of law
Convicted criminals whose sentences increase during their prison term due to a change in the law have been illegally subjected to ex post facto law.
Ex post facto is a Latin term that means "after the fact." In law, it refers to a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the enactment of the law.
The U.S. Constitution specifically prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws. This means that the government cannot punish someone for an action that was not a crime when they committed it, or increase the punishment for an action that was a crime when they committed it.
Therefore, if a criminal's sentence is increased during their prison term due to a change in the law, it would be a violation of the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
To know more about Convicted criminals, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19990011#
#SPJ11
In tort actions, plaintiffs may seek two kinds of damages: Group of answer choices punitive and compensatory. punitive and special. compensatory and general. compensatory and special.
The plaintiffs in tort actions may seek two kinds of damages: compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are meant to compensate the plaintiff for their losses, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
They are intended to make the plaintiff "whole" again, or at least as close to their pre-injury state as possible. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are intended to punish the defendant for their wrongful conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future. Punitive damages are only awarded in cases where the defendant's actions were particularly egregious or reckless, and are not meant to compensate the plaintiff directly.
The other answer choices are not accurate because "special" damages are simply a type of compensatory damages that are meant to compensate for specific financial losses, and "general" damages are another term for non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering) that are included in compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages, on the other hand, are intended to compensate the plaintiff for their losses and make them whole again. Compensatory damages can be further divided into special (economic) damages, which cover quantifiable losses, and general (non-economic) damages, which cover non-quantifiable losses such as pain and suffering.
To Know more about Compensatory damages
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ11
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
If a defendant requests a three-week continuance, this delay does not affect the time limits required for a speedy trial. true false
It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In some jurisdictions, a defendant's request for a continuance may toll or pause the time limits for a speedy trial, while in others it may not. Additionally, the length of the continuance and the reasons for the request may also be factors that are taken into consideration when determining whether the speedy trial clock is still running. It's important to consult the specific laws and rules of the jurisdiction in question to determine how a request for a continuance may impact the speedy trial timeline.
The statement is false. A continuance refers to a postponement or delay in the trial proceedings.
When a defendant requests a three-week continuance, the time limits required for a speedy trial are indeed affected.
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to a speedy trial. The time limits for a speedy trial vary from state to state, but typically range from 60 to 90 days.
If a defendant requests a continuance, the time clock for a speedy trial is paused during the period of delay. Thus, the total time for a speedy trial may be extended to accommodate the defendant's request for a continuance.
To know more about trial proceedings refer here: https://brainly.com/question/7643591#
#SPJ11
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in ______.
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in 1890.
The article, titled "The Right to Privacy," was written by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis and was published in the Harvard Law Review. In this article, Warren and Brandeis argued that the law should recognize an individual's right to privacy as a natural right that is necessary for the preservation of personal dignity and autonomy.
They contended that this right should protect individuals from the invasion of their private lives by the press and other intrusive actors. The publication of this article was a significant moment in the development of privacy law in the United States and has influenced the development of privacy jurisprudence both in the United States and around the world.
To learn more about right to privacy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
________ torts occur when the defendant takes an action that is inherently dangerous and cannot ever be undertaken safely, no matter what precautions the defendant takes, like jumping out of an airplane without a parachute.
The type of tort you are referring to is known as an "ultra-hazardous activity tort."
This is a complex area of law, and providing a detailed answer would require delving into the various legal nuances and interpretations of this particular tort. However, in short, an ultra-hazardous activity tort occurs when the defendant engages in an activity that is so inherently dangerous that no amount of care or precaution can make it safe.
This is different from other types of torts, such as negligence, where the defendant's actions are judged based on a standard of reasonable care. Because ultra-hazardous activities are so inherently dangerous, the law generally holds defendants strictly liable for any harm that results from their actions.
This means that the plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant was negligent, only that the harm was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity. Overall, the long answer to your question is that an ultra-hazardous activity tort is a specific type of tort that arises when the defendant engages in an inherently dangerous activity that cannot be made safe, and the law holds them strictly liable for any resulting harm.
Learn more about torts
https://brainly.com/question/14965931
#SPJ11
_______________ is a rule in tort law, used in the majority of states, that reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to the plaintiff's degree of fault, rather than barring recovery completely.
The rule in tort law that you are referring to is known as comparative negligence.
This legal principle is widely used in the majority of states and aims to allocate responsibility between the plaintiff and defendant in a lawsuit. Comparative negligence operates by reducing the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in proportion to their own degree of fault in causing their injuries.
In other words, if a plaintiff is found to be partially responsible for their own injuries, their damages award will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 25% at fault for an accident that caused them $100,000 in damages, they would only be able to recover $75,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 25%).
Comparative negligence is designed to promote fairness and accuracy in tort law by holding each party responsible for their contribution to the harm suffered. It allows for a more nuanced approach to determining liability, rather than an all-or-nothing approach that would completely bar recovery for plaintiffs who are partially at fault.
Learn more about plaintiff :
https://brainly.com/question/29213966
#SPJ11
If I go to class tomorrow without having done the reading, my professor will call on me and be angry that I am not prepared. However, if I stay up all night, which is what I would have to do to catch up on the reading, he will be angry because I will be too tired to stay awake in class. The above argument is constructed to lead to which one of the following conclusions?
A. If I go to class tomorrow, my professor will be angry with me.
B. If I stay home tomorrow to catch up on the reading, my professor will be angry that I skipped class.
C. It would be better for me to skip class tomorrow than to stay up late reading
D. My professor will be angry.
E. If my professor is angry with me, it is because I fell behind on the reading.
Discuss the issues that were at the core of the Scottsboro case and the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions delivered in the case.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Scottsboro case was a landmark legal case in the United States that began in 1931 and continued for over a decade. The case centred around nine black teenagers who were accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama. The case became a symbol of racial injustice in the United States and raised important questions about the role of race in the criminal justice system.
At the core of the Scottsboro case was the issue of racial discrimination. The defendants were charged and convicted in a highly charged atmosphere of racial hatred and bigotry, and they received little in the way of a fair trial. The Scottsboro defendants were initially sentenced to death, and although the U.S. Supreme Court overturned their convictions twice, they were eventually found guilty again and sentenced to long prison terms.
The consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the Scottsboro case were significant. The Court's decisions highlighted the need for greater protection of defendants' rights in criminal trials, especially in cases where racial bias may be present. The Scottsboro case led to important legal precedents that helped to establish a defendant's right to a fair trial and the right to an impartial jury.
The Scottsboro case also helped to raise awareness about the issue of racial discrimination and segregation in the United States. The case became a rallying cry for the civil rights movement, and it helped to galvanize support for the movement's efforts to end segregation and secure equal rights for all Americans.
Overall, the Scottsboro case was a pivotal moment in the struggle for civil rights in the United States. It brought issues of racial discrimination to the forefront of public consciousness and helped to shape the legal and social landscape of the country. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of justice and equality in all aspects of society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
A question that a judge must ask to determine whether a proceeding or document is presumptively open is _____.
A question that a judge must ask to determine whether a proceeding or document is presumptively open is whether there is a strong presumption in favour of public access to that particular type of proceeding or document.
In other words, the judge must determine whether there is a legal presumption that the proceeding or document should be open to the public unless there is a compelling reason to close it. This presumption is based on the First Amendment's guarantee of a free press and the public's right to know about the workings of the government.
The judge must also consider any applicable laws or rules that may provide guidance on whether the proceeding or document is presumptively open or closed. Ultimately, the judge must balance the public's interest in access against any countervailing interests, such as privacy concerns or national security considerations, in order to make a determination on whether the proceeding or document should be open or closed.
To know more about Proceedings visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15122322
#SPJ11
A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is: illegal and void. enforceable as a quasi-contract. illegal and voidable. illegal and dischargeable.
A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is considered illegal and void. This means that the contract is not legally binding and cannot be enforced by either party.
It is important to note that the illegality of the contract must be related to the purpose of the contract, rather than incidental or minor violations of the law. For example, a contract to sell illegal drugs would be illegal and void, but a contract to sell a car where one party happened to be driving without a license would likely still be enforceable. It is not possible for the contract to be enforceable as a quasi-contract, as quasi-contracts arise when there is no actual contract in place but one party has received unjust enrichment at the expense of the other. In the case of an illegal contract, there is no valid contract, to begin with.
The contract is also not simply voidable, which would mean that one party has the option to void or cancel the contract at their discretion. Instead, the contract is considered illegal and void, meaning that it is null and void from the outset and cannot be ratified or enforced.
Finally, the contract is not dischargeable, as discharge typically refers to the release of a party from their obligations under a contract. In the case of an illegal contract, there are no valid obligations, to begin with, so discharge is not applicable.
In summary, a contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void, which means it is not enforceable and has no legal effect. This is a detailed answer to your question that provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications of an illegal contract.
Learn more about quasi-contract
https://brainly.com/question/29651556
#SPJ11
A contract that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract opposes public policy and societal interests. Additionally, if any contract limits competition and encourages illegal activities, it also falls under such a category.
Explanation:A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract is not enforceable, as it opposes public policy and societal interests. Generally, a legal system must enforce contracts to ensure economic transactions and growth. However, if a contract encourages illegal activities, this opposes the purpose of law and justice, therefore, it falls into the category of an unlawful contract.
Consider this example for a clearer understanding: If a large retailer obtained the exclusive rights to be the only distributor of televisions, computers, and audio equipment made by various companies, then, this exclusive contract despite potentially being legal, may limit competition and hence, it would have an anticompetitive effect and could be ruled as unlawful.
Learn more about Unlawful Contracts here:https://brainly.com/question/33763152
#SPJ6
One who commits a tort is called the Multiple Choice tortmaster. torteffector. tortfeasor. tortdoer.
The term for one who commits a tort is a tortfeasor.
A tortfeasor is a person or entity that is responsible for committing a tort, which is a civil wrong that results in harm to another person or their property. Examples of torts include negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and trespassing.
The term "tortfeasor" comes from the Latin words "tortus," which means twisted, and "facere," which means to do or to make. In other words, a tortfeasor is someone who has twisted or distorted the rights of another person through their actions.
When a tort is committed, the injured party can seek damages or compensation from the tortfeasor through a civil lawsuit. The amount of damages awarded depends on the severity of the harm caused, the intent of the tortfeasor, and other factors.
In some cases, the tortfeasor may also face criminal charges if their actions were particularly egregious, such as in cases of assault or battery.
To know more about committing a tort, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669139#
#SPJ11
1. Mr. Rodrigo alyas Digong was held fragrante delicto for taking cartons of Sardines can goods, accused argued that he should only be convicted of frustrated theft for taking can goods from the supermarket since he was immediately apprehended by the security guard. Is the contention of Digong correct? What crime did he committed? Explain why? ( 10 Points)
2. Tiborcio fired at Kurdapyo’s room, although in reality, the latter was not present in his room; thus, Tiborcio failed to kill him. If inherent impossibility of accomplishing the crime. What factual crime does committed by Tiborcio? Explain. ( 10 points )
3. Patrolman Gunggong dropped a hand grenade inside a house, killing Pikoy instantly and causing Butog, Pokang, Dagul & Mokong to suffer shrapnel wounds on their bodies. What crime committed by Patrolman Gunggong for the grave negligence and mistake he committed? ( 10 Points )
In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.
What crime did Digong commit and why?The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.
In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.
Read more about sales contract
brainly.com/question/28326714
#SPJ1
The doctrine which is applied when a defendant violates an existing statute intended to prevent the injury in question to persons of a class which includes the plaintiff is: Group of answer choices Negligence per se. Res ipsa loquitur. Proximate cause statute. Concurrent statutory violation.
The doctrine that applies when a defendant violates an existing statute intended to prevent injury to persons of a class which includes the plaintiff is negligence per se.
This legal principle assumes that the defendant has acted negligently, and as a result, the plaintiff has been harmed. Negligence per se simplifies the process of establishing negligence by eliminating the need to prove that the defendant breached a duty of care owed to the plaintiff.
To establish negligence per se, the plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant violated a statute; (2) the statute was designed to prevent the type of injury that occurred; (3) the plaintiff is a member of the class of persons the statute was designed to protect; and (4) the violation of the statute was the cause of the plaintiff's injury.
In summary, negligence per se is a doctrine that enables plaintiffs to recover damages when a defendant's violation of a statute results in injury to a person of a class that includes the plaintiff. It is a powerful tool in personal injury litigation that simplifies the process of proving negligence and facilitates the recovery of damages for injured parties.
Learn more about plaintiff :
https://brainly.com/question/29213966
#SPJ11
Nashville, Tennessee, passes an ordinance to regulate waste disposal. The disposal of waste may also be regulated by
A detailed answer to your question is that while Nashville, Tennessee may pass an ordinance to regulate waste disposal within its city limits, waste disposal may also be regulated by other entities.
For example, the state of Tennessee may have its own regulations regarding waste disposal, as well as federal regulations set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Additionally, certain types of waste, such as hazardous waste, may be subject to specialized regulations and requirements.
To provide a long answer, waste disposal is a complex issue that involves various factors, including public health, environmental protection, and economic considerations. Waste can take many forms, such as solid waste, hazardous waste, medical waste, and electronic waste, and each type of waste may require specific methods of disposal to prevent harm to people and the environment.
To regulate waste disposal, local governments may establish ordinances that set rules for how waste should be collected, transported, and disposed of within their jurisdiction. For example, Nashville's waste disposal ordinance may require residents and businesses to use certain types of waste containers or to separate recyclable materials from non-recyclable waste.
However, these local regulations are often supplemented by state and federal regulations that set minimum standards for waste disposal. For instance, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation oversees the state's solid waste program, which includes regulations for landfill operations, waste reduction, and recycling. Meanwhile, the EPA regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which establishes rules for how hazardous waste must be handled, transported, and disposed of.
In summary, waste disposal can be regulated by multiple entities, and regulations can vary depending on the type of waste and the location where it is generated. A comprehensive understanding of waste disposal regulations requires an explanation of the different types of waste and the regulatory agencies involved, as well as an in-depth analysis of specific regulations that apply to a particular situation.
Learn more about waste disposal
https://brainly.com/question/2724332
#SPJ11
Which statement best describes both the positive and negative effects
lobbyists have on the democratic process?
O A. Lobbyists give small groups a voice in U.S. politics but may
influence lawmakers to support policies that do not benefit the
public in general.
O B. Lobbyists make the role of money in politics more transparent but
allow the majority to more easily deny rights to vulnerable minority
groups.
C. Lobbyists help voters learn more about candidates for office, but
prevent third parties from successfully challenging the two-party
system.
D. Lobbyists help political leaders spread their messages to voters,
but rely heavily on donations from corporations and super PACS.
A. Lobbyists provide a platform for small groups to become part of U.S. politics, yet their sway may cause legislators to back policies that do not offer collective gain.
How to find the best descriptionOption A accurately characterizes both the upside and downside of lobbyists on participatory democracy. On one hand, they can give smaller factions representation in legislative matters, allowing them to express concerns and participate in governmental deliberations.
Nevertheless, the detrimental consequence is that lobbyists may endeavor to push measures that are contrary to more universal interests, yet benefit those actors and organizations they address or serve.
Learn more about democratic process at
https://brainly.com/question/29798216
#SPJ1
Henry Knievel suffered a badly broken left leg in a motorcycle accident. Dr. Van Helsing assures Mr. Knievel that he can fix it like it was never broken with a new surgical procedure that Dr. Van Helsing wants to use. "It will be perfect," promises Dr. Van Helsing. Unfortunately, the procedure did not go as planned, and Mr. Knievel’s left leg is now 2" shorter than his right one. Mr. Knievel sues Dr. Van Helsing. Using contract law (not negligence or medical malpractice), how do you measure the damages that Mr. Knievel may recover?
In contract law, the damages that Mr. Knievel may recover are determined by the concept of "expectation damages."
Expectation damages aim to put the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed. In this case, Mr. Knievel expected his leg to be fixed like it was never broken, as promised by Dr. Van Helsing. To measure the damages, one would calculate the difference between Mr. Knievel's current situation (with a leg 2" shorter than the other) and the situation he would have been in had the surgery been successful (with a leg that was fixed like it was never broken).
Factors to consider when calculating damages may include:
1. Additional medical costs: Mr. Knievel might need further treatments or surgeries to address the issue caused by Dr. Van Helsing's procedure.
2. Lost wages: If Mr. Knievel's injury resulted in an inability to work or reduced working capacity, he may be entitled to recover lost wages.
3. Pain and suffering: The court might also take into account any pain and suffering Mr. Knievel experienced due to the unsuccessful procedure.
It's essential to note that this answer is based on contract law principles and not negligence or medical malpractice, which could have different methods for calculating damages.
To know more about contract law visit:
brainly.com/question/29484475
#SPJ11
__________ can best be defined as the process through which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge with the expectation of receiving some benefit from the state.
The term you are referring to is commonly known as plea bargaining.
A detailed answer to this question would explain that plea bargaining is a negotiation process between a defendant and the prosecution, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a criminal charge in exchange for a reduction in charges, a lighter sentence, or some other benefit from the state.
This process can save time and resources for both parties, as it avoids the need for a full trial. However, it has also been criticized for leading to unfair outcomes and contributing to a "guilty until proven innocent" mentality in the justice system. A long answer would delve further into the history and controversies surrounding plea bargaining, and discuss some of the arguments for and against its use in criminal cases.
The process through which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge with the expectation of receiving some benefit from the state can best be defined as "plea bargaining." In plea bargaining, the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a more lenient sentence or a reduction in charges. This process typically involves negotiation between the prosecution and defense to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
Learn more about Plea Bargaining
https://brainly.com/question/27804501
#SPJ11
What type of court has been designed to focus on treatment options instead of punishment for drug convictions
The type of court that has been designed to focus on treatment options instead of punishment for drug convictions is a drug court.
Drug courts are specialized courts that aim to address the root cause of drug-related criminal activity, which is often substance abuse or addiction. Instead of sending defendants to jail, drug courts offer a range of treatment options, including substance abuse counseling, therapy, and rehabilitation programs.
Participants in drug courts are required to attend regular court appearances, undergo regular drug testing, and comply with the court's treatment plan. Successful completion of the program can result in reduced charges or even dismissal of charges.
Drug courts have been implemented in various jurisdictions across the United States as a way to reduce recidivism rates among drug offenders and promote long-term recovery.
To know more about drug court., refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31677573#
#SPJ11