The indigenous law of the Quarmyne in sub-Saharan African jurisdictions includes protections for people accused of witchcraft.
The Quarmyne indigenous law recognizes the belief in witchcraft and seeks to protect those who are falsely accused of practicing it. This law views witchcraft as a religious or spiritual belief and acknowledges that accusations of witchcraft are often used to settle disputes or resolve conflicts.
The protections provided by the Quarmyne law include a requirement for strong evidence before someone can be convicted of witchcraft and restrictions on the use of physical force or violence against those accused of practicing it.
Additionally, the law seeks to provide a fair and impartial trial process to ensure that individuals are not unfairly persecuted or punished for their beliefs.
To know more about indigenous law click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28525120#
#SPJ11
What does no ex post facto laws?
The United States Constitution, as well as the constitutions of other nations, both uphold the idea of "no ex post facto laws." Ex post facto refers to laws that modify the legal ramifications or status of actions carried out before the legislation was established. The term is derived from the Latin ex post facto, which means "after the fact."
The "no ex post facto legislation" principle forbids the application of criminal laws retroactively to render an act unlawful after it has already been done or to impose harsher penalties for an already-committed act. This means that the government cannot enact legislation that would criminalize conduct that wasn't already unlawful or that would enhance the penalties for conduct that has already been committed. This rule aims to safeguard people from capricious and retroactive criminal penalties and to advance justice and predictability in the criminal justice system.
For such more question on ex post facto:
brainly.com/question/2498364
#SPJ4
Why is the Supreme Court case Snyder v. Phelps an example of competing rights?
The Supreme court docket case snyder v. phelps is an example of competing rights because the proper of privacy and speech inflicting emotional misery got here into combat with the freedom of speech.
In Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court dominated 8-1 that the First Amendment prohibited the imposition of civil legal responsibility upon a church and its individuals who picketed the funeral of a slain Marine.
What are competing rights?In general, competing human rights involve conditions where parties to a dispute claim that the enjoyment of an person or group's human rights and freedoms, as protected by law, would intervene with another's rights and freedoms.
Learn more about Snyder v. Phelps here:
https://brainly.com/question/2056151 #SPJ4state ________ are established in cities and counties to render decisions when judicial disputes arise.
State courts are established in cities and counties to render decisions when judicial disputes arise.
State laws established state courts, which are established and have extensive jurisdiction. From criminal cases to family law disagreements, these courts can hear cases on anything. Federal courts, on the other hand, have far more limited authority and were founded by the U.S. Constitution. Separate from individual state courts, the federal court system was founded by the Judiciary Act of 1789. It was one of the First Congress's initial acts. On September 24, 1789, it was ratified by President George Washington.
Learn more about judicial disputes from here:
https://brainly.com/question/30323036
#SPJ4
Is a Medical office condo considered a residential transaction?
For investors in commercial real estate, medical office buildings are a class of assets that is growing in appeal. According to both the demand for services and the shortage of healthcare professionals, the healthcare sector is one of the fastest-growing in the country.
Why would a doctor need office space?For investors in commercial real estate, medical office buildings are a class of assets that is growing in appeal. According to both the demand for services and the shortage of healthcare professionals, the healthcare sector is one of the fastest-growing in the country.The industry is strengthened as a result, and the need for medical office buildings is sustained. Given the robust underlying fundamentals of the sector, a medical office is an excellent choice for risk-averse investors.The term "medical office building" (MOB) refers to a type of office space that is expressly created for medical practices. As a result, MOBs incorporate features or design philosophies that aim to boost patient outcomes and satisfaction.To learn more about medical office refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6626489
#SPJ1
president truman used his executive power to enforce
president truman used his executive power to enforce: The federal protection of voting rights.
President Harry Truman established the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services on July 26, 1948, by signing Executive Order 9981. The desegregation of the American military was required under the directive. The opening line of the executive order states, "It is therefore declared to be the policy of the President that there will be equality of treatment and opportunity for all individuals in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin." This policy shall take effect as soon as is reasonably possible, taking into account the time required to execute any necessary adjustments without detriment to productivity or morale.
To know more about truman:
https://brainly.com/question/3543190
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. federal judges are appointed by the ________ and must be approved by the ________.
Federal judges are appointed by the President and must be approved by the Senate.
In general, the president of a country serves as the formal head of state, head of the executive branch, and essential leader of the country. The Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces and the head of state and government of the United States of America are the President. According to Article II of the Constitution, the President is in charge of carrying out and upholding the laws passed by Congress.
The House of Representatives is the lower body of the United States Congress, and the United States Senate is its upper chamber. The United States' national bicameral legislature is made up of them all.
To learn more about president here
brainly.com/question/23963476
#SPJ4
Sarah Williams, travelling for business, stopped at hotel in the early evening planning to stay overnight. Ms. Williams had stayed at this hotel in the past. During her last stay, she presented a stolen credit card to the front desk for payment. Only after Ms. Williams checked out and the credit card company refused payment, did the hotel realize that the credit card was not Ms. Williams. So, when Ms. Williams presented herself to the front desk to check in during the current business trip, the clerk at the front desk refused to provide her overnight accommodations. Ms. Williams was furious and intends to sue. Her suit will likely:
a.
Succeed because hotels cannot refuse accommodations to a potential guest for any reason.
b.
Fail because hotels have unlimited rights under the law to refuse accommodations to potential guests.
c.
Succeed because a hotel cannot refuse a guest when they are checking in at night.
d.
Fail because hotels have a limited right to refuse guests who have previously defrauded them.
Ms. Williams was furious and intends to sue. Her suit will likely: d.Fail because hotels have a limited right to refuse guests who have previously defrauded them.
What is the suing about?Ms. Williams's lawsuit against the hotel will likely fail because hotels have a limited right to refuse guests who have previously defrauded them. This is based on the idea that hotels are businesses and have the right to protect themselves from financial harm.
Therefore, The hotel's refusal of Ms. Williams's check-in is based on the fact that she used a stolen credit card during her last stay at the hotel, and they want to protect themselves from potential financial harm that may occur if she repeats this behavior. While it is important to respect the rights of individuals, in this case, the hotel's right to protect its financial interests overrides the right of Ms. Williams to check in.
Learn more about suing form
https://brainly.com/question/1065754
#SPJ1
the court case mcculloch v. maryland ruled in favor of?
In the court case of McCulloch v Maryland, the ruling made by the court was in the favor of Maryland state, who was the defendant in the case.
The rulings made by the Supreme Court are sometimes interpreted as the landmark decisions due to the significance that they hold due to the decisions being made. The court case mentioned above has been an indispensable part of the decisions that have been made till now in the essence of the support towards the government bodies favored by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about court case here:
https://brainly.com/question/4564773
#SPJ4
my mother excluded me from her will — before she died, my sibling cashed out her annuity policy, on which i was a beneficiary. should i sue my family?
The poem's line "That bravery, like a rock..." contains a simile.
A simile is a figure of speech that uses the words "like" or "as" to compare two dissimilar things.
The phrase "courage" is contrasted to "a rock" in this instance.
A simile differs from a metaphor in that it offers a direct comparison without the use of the terms "like" or "as," whereas a metaphor does not.
These words, which describe a mother's unwavering love, may be found in the Buddhist text "Nirvana Sutra" and are said to have been spoken by Buddha himself. It embodies filial piety, which is the act of being righteous and submissive to one's own parents.
For such more question on That bravery
https://brainly.com/question/20350861
#SPJ4
judicial authority over the person is known as in rem jurisdiction.
It is factually correct to be mentioning that the 'in rem jurisdiction' is also known as the judicial authority over the person. So, the aforementioned statement holds true.
A judicial authority may be generally understood as the legal right that is better off against a person as per the provided regulations thereunder. Such authority invoked against a person by law is also regarded as an ''in rem jurisdiction'', and can never be questioned. This authority is legally binding upon the every person under its scope.
Learn more about judicial authority here:
https://brainly.com/question/2516262
#SPJ4
TRUE OR FALSE
judicial authority over the person is known as in rem jurisdiction.
how many cases has the legendary lawyer gerry spence lost while prosecutor or defense lawyer?
In America, Gerry Spence is regarded as one of the best trial and criminal lawyers. As a prosecutor or defense lawyer, he has never once lost a criminal case, and since 1969, he hasn't lost a civil case either.
Gerald Leonard Spence, an American trial lawyer who is currently in semi-retirement, was born on January 8, 1929. He belongs to the Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Since 1969, Spence has not lost a civil case, and as a prosecutor or defense attorney, he has never lost a criminal case in front of a jury.
Spence tried a number of notable cases after the Silkwood case. Since 1969, he has not lost a civil case, and he has never lost a criminal case with a jury trial. In addition to having several of his more notable civil decisions overturned on appeal, he also had a manslaughter case from 1985 that he lost in a bench trial in Newport, Oregon, but won on appeal.
To know more about spence :
https://brainly.com/question/4410226
#SPJ4
using cohen, as completely as you can, explain the "pure legal advocate con-cept" of a lawyer, and what makes a lawyer good on this concept?
The concept of a "pure legal advocate" refers to a lawyer who is solely focused on advocating for their client within the bounds of the law. This means that their primary responsibility is to represent their client's interests and argue for their legal rights, regardless of their personal opinions or beliefs about the case.
To be a good "pure legal advocate," a lawyer must possess several key qualities. Firstly, they must have a strong understanding of the law and be well-versed in the legal system. This includes having knowledge of relevant laws, precedents, and court procedures.
Additionally, a good "pure legal advocate" must be an effective communicator. They should be able to present their client's case persuasively, both in writing and in oral argument. They must be able to clearly articulate the legal arguments and evidence in support of their client's position.
Another important quality is impartiality. As a "pure legal advocate," a lawyer must be able to set aside their personal opinions and beliefs and remain neutral in their representation of their client. This can be challenging, especially in controversial or emotionally charged cases. However, it is critical to maintaining their credibility as a legal advocate.
Finally, a good "pure legal advocate" must have a strong ethical compass. They must adhere to the standards of professionalism and integrity, and maintain the confidentiality of their client's information. This is essential to building trust with their client and maintaining the integrity of the legal system.
In summary, being a "pure legal advocate" requires a combination of legal expertise, strong communication skills, impartiality, and ethical behavior. These qualities enable lawyers to effectively represent their clients and ensure that justice is served within the legal system.
For more about a pure legal advocate:
https://brainly.com/question/13402559
#SPJ11
How do I report an insider threat?
If you are not a government employee, military member, or contractor and are in a situation where you feel you need to disclose an insider threat, you should get in touch with your local law enforcement or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
An insider danger is the possibility that a worker or contractor will improperly or intentionally exploit their access to compromise American security.
The term "insider threat" does not apply to any attack that comes from an unreliable, unidentified, external source. So that any abnormal traffic behaviors may be found, insider threats necessitate advanced monitoring and logging systems.
For more information on insider threat kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/27671019
#SPJ4
the fourteenth amendment attempted to guarantee which of the following to former slaves?
The fourteenth amendment attempted to guarantee citizenship rights to former slaves.
No State shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no State shall rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection of the laws. Anyone born in the country or who acquired citizenship was given citizenship and equal civil and legal rights under the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. African Americans and former slaves who had been set free after the American Civil War were included in this.
Learn more about fourteenth amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/7570923
#SPJ4
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are -Benjamin Franklin
What is the Justice about?This quote highlights the importance of empathy and solidarity in ensuring that justice is served. The idea is that justice is not truly achieved unless everyone, regardless of whether they are directly impacted by a particular issue or not, is equally passionate and motivated to fight for it.
When people who are unaffected are just as outraged as those who are directly impacted, it creates a more powerful force for change and holds those in positions of power accountable.
Therefore, The quote emphasizes the importance of understanding the perspectives and experiences of others, and using this understanding to fight for a more just and equitable society.
Learn more about Justice form
https://brainly.com/question/25756666
#SPJ1
How did the case of Jimmy Ray Payne play a role in the conviction of Wayne Williams?
Note that Jimmy Ray Payne was a key piece of evidence in the conviction of Wayne Williams for the Atlanta Child Murders. Payne was the last person seen with one of the victims and his murder was similar in nature to the others attributed to Wayne Williams.
Who is Wayne Williams?Wayne Bertram Williams is a convicted murderer and suspected serial killer from the United States who is spending life in prison for the 1981 murders of two men in Atlanta, Georgia.
After Payne's death, fibers found on his clothing were traced back to Wayne Williams' home and car. This evidence was instrumental in linking Williams to the Atlanta Child Murders and helped to establish a pattern of similar fibers found on other victims.
Additionally, the testimony of an expert witness regarding the fibers found on Payne's clothing helped to establish a connection between Williams and the other victims. This evidence was used by the prosecution to build a case against Williams and helped to secure his conviction for the murders of Jimmy Ray Payne and two other young men.
Learn more about Wayne Williams:
https://brainly.com/question/3235308
#SPJ1
how long after your taxes are accepted to get refund 2023
Only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal of the case to a higher court.a. Trueb. False
It is true that only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal of the case to a higher court. An appeal is a legal process in which a party to a court case requests that a higher court review the decision of the lower court.
Generally, only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal. The objective of an appeal is to determine if the lower court’s decision was correct and to ensure that the law was correctly applied in the case. The appeals court will review the arguments and evidence presented to the lower court, and may affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court’s decision.
In the United States, there are both state and federal appellate courts. After a decision is made in a lower state court, the losing party can appeal the decision to the state’s highest court. If the losing party is unsatisfied with the decision of the state’s highest court, then they can appeal the decision to the federal appellate court.
To know more about appeal refer to the link brainly.com/question/23936876
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. an insurer has ___ days to file a notice of appointment to the commissioner.
An insurer has fifteen (15) days days to file a notice of appointment to the commissioner.
An insurer is a third party who agrees to compensate individuals, businesses, or other organizations for specific financial losses. A financial loss would include the destruction of a home due to a fire or the loss of a vehicle due to an accident — any event that leaves the client in a worse financial position than before the event occurred.
While an insurance company is the "insurer," the person who buys insurance is the "insured." The contractual agreement between the insurer and the insured specifies the exact losses covered and the exact cost of the premiums. Each party must abide by certain conditions in order for the insured to be compensated for their loss.
Learn more about an insurer
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ4
What news does the Boatswain bring when he appears before Prospero in Act V of The Tempest?
When the Master and Boatswain arrive, they announce that the ship is in the same condition as "when we first put out to sea."
The officer (or enlisted person) in command of the sails, rigging, anchors, cables, etc., and all deck operations on a sailing ship is known as a boatswain (plural boatswains). the petty officer in charge of overseeing the activities of other sailors on a merchant ship. A type of gull called a jaeger.
They served as the navy's standing officers and repaired and sailed the ships. The officer in charge of maintaining the rigging, baling twine, anchors, sails, boats, flags, and other stores was known as the boatswain.
The Bureau of Navy Personnel (BUPERS) assigns enlisted soldiers who'd been rated or "qualifying" for a said rating of deck seaman the professional rating for boatswain's mate (referred to simply as BM).
Learn more about boatswain here:
https://brainly.com/question/1456326
#SPJ4
the bureau of naval personnel career counselor handbook is what instruction?
the bureau of naval personnel career counselor handbook is NAVPERS 15878L
The Navy Career Information Program's main objective is to make sure that every Sailor receives sufficient and reliable career information in a timely way so they can make informed career decisions. The dedication of the chain of command to ensuring that every Sailor is given the direction and chance to succeed is the cornerstone of a successful program.
An efficient Career Development Program can be established and managed on the foundation provided by the Career Information Program. It is intended specifically to involve the chain of command and the career counselor in the professional development of Sailors.
Commands and career counselors are given the resources they need to create, administer, and oversee a successful career development program by the Bureau of Naval Personnel Career Counselor Handbook.
To know more about bureau:
https://brainly.com/question/29989771
#SPJ4
IRAC is a form of writing generally used by lawyers when interpreting the law and analyzing a legal situation.
How does this differ from the APA format?
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion) is a specific format for organizing legal arguments and writing about legal cases, while APA (American Psychological Association) format is a writing style used primarily in the social sciences for academic and research papers.
The main differences between IRAC and APA format are the purpose, structure, and content of the writing. IRAC focuses on legal analysis and draws conclusions about the application of the law, while APA format focuses on presenting research findings and providing references and citations.
to know more about apa format refer here
https://brainly.com/question/12548905#
#SPJ11
discretion is strongly associated with
Explanation:
Discretion is strongly associated with the exercise of judgment and decision-making in law enforcement. It refers to the latitude that an individual police officer has in determining the appropriate course of action in a given situation, taking into account their training, department policies, and the specific circumstances of the case. The use of discretion is a critical aspect of policing as it allows officers to make decisions that balance the enforcement of laws with the protection of individual rights and the needs of the community.
Discretion is strongly associated with police officers' decision-making processes. It refers to the power or freedom that police officers have to make choices and decisions in carrying out their duties and responsibilities
Discretion refers to the ability to make decisions or act on one's own authority and responsibility, especially when it comes to matters requiring judgment, sensitivity, or confidentiality. It is a crucial attribute in many professional and personal contexts and is often closely associated with concepts such as independence, autonomy, and responsibility. In the legal system, discretion is the power given to a judge to make decisions based on their own judgment and the specific circumstances of a case, rather than being bound by strict rules or precedents. Similarly, in the fields of law enforcement and the military, discretion is often exercised by individuals in positions of authority, who must weigh the consequences of their actions and make decisions that serve the greater good.
Learn more about judgment :
https://brainly.com/question/14969838
#SPJ4
Do you agree with the KISS rule of writing ("Keep it Short and Simple") in term of report writing? Why or why not?
I agree with the KISS rule of writing ("Keep it Short and Simple") in term of report writing.
According to the "Keep it Short and Simple" (KISS) rule, reports and other papers should be brief and simple to read.
As it encourages simplicity and clarity in communication, this guideline can be helpful in a variety of circumstances.
This guideline does not, however, always hold true for all types of reports or all audiences. For instance, some reports could need a more in-depth examination, which necessitates writing that is more sophisticated or extensive.
The intended audience may also influence the level of technical detail needed, with certain audiences demanding more technical detail than others.
Learn more about report writing:
https://brainly.com/question/28430200
#SPJ4
Can a texas appeals judge be impeached?
Yes, a Texas appeals judge can be impeached. According to the Texas Constitution, any elected official, including judges, can be impeached for high crimes, misdemeanors, or other forms of official misconduct.
The process of impeachment begins in the Texas House of Representatives, where a vote must be taken to determine whether the evidence of misconduct is sufficient to warrant an impeachment trial in the Texas Senate.
If a judge is impeached and found guilty of the charges by the Senate, they can be removed from office and barred from holding any future public office in the state of Texas.
The ability to impeach a judge serves as a check on the power of the judiciary and ensures accountability and transparency in the administration of justice.
Texas appeals judge can be impeached if they are found to have engaged in serious misconduct while in office. The process of impeachment is a crucial aspect of maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and ensuring that judges are held accountable for their actions.
To learn more about impeachment refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1411922#
#SPJ11
The law of mass action states that _____.
law of mass action, regulation declaring that the price of any chemical reaction is proportional to the product of the masses of the reacting substances, with each mass raised to a energy equal to the coefficient that takes place in the chemical equation.
What regulation is the regulation of mass?The Law of Conservation of Mass dates from Antoine Lavoisier's 1789 discovery that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions. In other words, the mass of any one component at the commencing of a response will equal the mass of that component at the cease of the reaction.
What is regulation of mass action pressure?The law of mass motion describes a system at equilibrium in phrases of the concentrations of the products and the reactants. For a gadget involving one or more gases, both the molar concentrations of the gases or their partial pressures can be used.
Learn more about law of mass here:
https://brainly.com/question/13891351#SPJ4Which statement best explains the information in the graphic?
A.The secretary was confirmed by a party-line vote.
B.Confirmation was blocked by one party.
C.Independents swayed the vote for the majority.
D. Attempts at compromise were unsuccessful.
The sentence that best explains the information in the graphic is A.The secretary was confirmed by a party-line vote.
What is the importance of graphical information?An infographic, often known as a "information graphic," is a graphic depiction of information intended to make the material quickly and easily understandable. Infographics are used to swiftly convey a message, to make complex data presentations more understandable, to spot links and trends in data, and to track the evolution of variables.
Traffic signs, subway maps, tag clouds, musical scores, and weather charts are just a few examples of the numerous infographics that can be found in nearly any public setting.
All management levels in the company employ infographics to present high-level perspectives of data. Bar graphs, pie charts, histograms, line graphs, and tree diagrams are examples of infographics.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about information at:
https://brainly.com/question/24858866
#SPJ1
Consider the American Constitution. Why has this document survived as the guiding principal of American governance when so many other foreign Constitutions have risen and fallen? Is there anything special about the American Constitution? Does the American Constitution grant us some of our “American Exceptionalism,” or are we exceptional despite of the Constitution or not exceptional at all?
Answer:
The American Constitution has survived as the guiding principle of American governance for several reasons. Firstly, it is a flexible document that can adapt to changing times and circumstances through the amendment process. Secondly, it establishes a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, which helps to prevent any one branch from having too much power. Additionally, it guarantees individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, which have become deeply ingrained in American culture and are fiercely protected by the American people.
The American Constitution does play a role in America's "exceptionalism," but it is not the only factor. American exceptionalism refers to the belief that the United States is a unique and superior nation with a special destiny. This belief is based on a combination of factors, including the country's rich history, its political and economic systems, and its cultural values. The American Constitution is one of the key components of this belief, as it enshrines the values and principles that have made the United States what it is today.
In conclusion, the American Constitution has been a crucial factor in the survival and success of American governance, but it is not the only factor that has contributed to America's exceptionalism. It is the combination of many factors, including the Constitution, that make the United States unique and exceptional.
what is the main principle behind the law of conservation of matter?
The primary principle of the law of conservation of matter maintains to explain that the amount of matter does not get created or destroyed before and after a change has been experienced.
The law of conservation of matter can usually be taken into interpretation as the law that states about the condition of matter in any substance before and after there is an experience of change in any of its compositions. This law states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, irrespective of the changes that take place.
Learn more about law of conservation here:
https://brainly.com/question/24131537
#SPJ4
according to a rational material explanation 2013 government shutdown was mainly a conflict between
The federal government had to shut down due to a lack of funds appropriated rational material.
at the beginning of the new 2014 federal fiscal year because the Senate refused to pass the bill with provisions to delay the Affordable Care Act, and the two legislative houses had not developed a compromise bill by the end of September 2013 either. Due to furloughs of federal workers, reduced public services, and delays in payments to Federal grantees, States, localities, contractors, and people, the closure had an impact on millions of Americans. Government shutdowns take place in the United States when financing bills for the government's upcoming fiscal year or a temporary funding measure are not passed. Federal agencies continue to carry out their mandates countrywide. crucial activities and processes as decided by agency heads. To confirm your telework schedule and to get more information from your agency head, please get in touch with your supervisor rational material.
Learn more about rational here :
https://brainly.com/question/30359155
#SPJ4