The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have with them as non-involvement in European affairs.
George Washington was a devout advocate ofnon-involvement in the affairs of other countries especially European powers. This is why indeed though the French monarchy supported the Americans in gaining independence from the British, when they were overthrown in the French Revolution, the Americans under Washington didn't get involved. Washington allowed
it stylish to stay down from long term engagements with other nations and to maintain impartiality similar that the stylish policy can be objectively followed.
Learn more about rule of conduct at
https://brainly.com/question/19593536
#SPJ4
what article of the constitution establishes the executive branch
Article II is article of the constitution establishes the executive branch.
The executive arm of the federal government is established under Article II of the Constitution and is presided over by the President. Article II describes how the President is chosen, the extent of his or her authority and responsibilities, and how to remove them from office. The President's main duty is to carry out the executive branch's principal duty, which is to uphold the law. This session will examine the crucial function of the President in our constitutional system, ranging from the arguments at the Constitutional Convention over how to form the Presidency to the contemporary arguments about executive orders.
To know more about Article II:
https://brainly.com/question/17595096
#SPJ4
Leteisha McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts. The nightly rate for Oracle was $175.00. Unfortunately, when Ms. McCarthy arrived at the front desk to check-in, the hotel explained that it did not have a room available. Multiple guests in a block of rooms had decided to add another night to their stay. The hotel did not offer Ms. McCarthy an alternative and the only available accommodations she was able to find were at a nearby hotel called the Oasis, which had a nightly rate of $300.00. Having no other options, Ms. McCarthy registered for a two-night stay at the Oasis and spent $35.00 on a cab ride to get there. When she arrived home, Ms. McCarthy sent a demand letter to the Oracle Hotel insisting that she be reimbursed for the full cost of her two-night stay at Oasis, plus cab fare. Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:
a.
$630.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis plus cab fare.
b.
$600.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis as Ms. McCarthy is not entitled to cab fare.
c.
$380.00, the full cost of two nights at Oracle, plus cab fare.
d.
$285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
What is the law about?Ms. McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, but upon arrival, she was informed that the hotel did not have a room available for her. She had to book a stay at a nearby hotel, the Oasis, which had a higher nightly rate of $300.00. She is now claiming reimbursement from the Oracle Hotel for the full cost of her two-night stay at the Oasis ($600.00) plus the cost of her cab ride ($35.00), which would come to a total of $635.00.
Therefore, Under the law, the answer to the question of what Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect would depend on the contract between her and the Oracle Hotel, as well as the laws of the state where the hotel is located. The most accurate answer would be d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Learn more about law form
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Kryder's Law states that the storage density on magnetic disks is increasing at an exponential rate.
That is accurate, yes. Kryder's Law states that the storage density on magnetic disks is increasing at an exponential rate
A rule known as Kryder's Law is named for Mark Kryder, a specialist in magnetic storage.
It claims that, similar to Moore's Law for the growth of transistor density in microprocessors, the area density of magnetic disk storage is growing exponentially.
Kryder's Law states that magnetic disk storage density doubles roughly every 12 to 18 months.
This led to important developments in disk storage technology, allowing for the storage of ever-increasing volumes of data on smaller, more effective disk drives.
It should be emphasized, though, that the rate of growth has slowed recently as the effects of physical restrictions have become more obvious.
Learn more about Law:
https://brainly.com/question/29750431
#SPJ4
What must a prosecutor prove when the law requires mens rea? a. motive b. opportunity c. a criminal act d. intent
When the law requires mens rea, prosecutor shall prove the intent of the accused.
One of the most important elements of criminal law is mens rea. It is the basis upon which a prosecutor can hold one as guilty for most offences.
Criminal intent is referred to as mens rea. "Guilty mind" is the literal translation from Latin of the term mens rea..
The legal requirement for a particular defendant to be found guilty of a specific offence is known as a mens rea.
The mens rea requirement is based on the notion that one must have a guilty mindset and be conscious of their behaviour; nevertheless, a defendant need not be aware that their actions are unlawful in order to be found guilty of a crime.
The accused should be aware of the "facts that make his action match the criteria of the offence," instead.
The correct option is D.
To know more about mens rea, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10513615
#SPJ4
How did the Marshall Court strengthened the federal government?
The Marbury v. Madison (1803) case, which founded the doctrine of judicial scrutiny, was a historic victory by the Marshall Court that reinforced the federal government. Due to this ruling, the judicial branch now possesses the authority to find parliamentary acts to be illegitimate.
What is Marshall Court Federal Power?The Marshall Court was crucial in creating the current democratic union of the US government. Chief Justice John Marshall, who presided over the court from 1801 to 1835, oversaw a string of rulings that gradually enhanced the federal president's authority and established the concept of legal challenge.
Marbury v. Madison (1803), a case that founded the trial court principle, is perhaps one of the most well-known judgements of the Marshall Court. The Judiciary Act of 1789's clause in question was ruled illegal by the Supreme Court in this case, giving the court the jurisdiction to examine the activities of the other arms of government. With the powers of each branch properly delineated and subject to democratic accountability, this choice helped to assure that the central government would remain a constrained one.
To know more about Marshall Court Federal Power visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8501199
#SPJ4
2. when did paralegalism start to be recognized as a separate legal occupation?
The recognition of paralegalism as a separate legal occupation dates back to the 1960s. Prior to this time, the role of a paralegal was performed by legal secretaries, clerks, and other administrative personnel who assisted lawyers in their work.
However, as the practice of law became more complex, the demand for skilled and specialized support staff grew, leading to the recognition of paralegalism as a separate and distinct profession.
One of the key factors that led to the recognition of paralegalism was the increasing need for cost-effective legal services. Lawyers and law firms were seeking ways to increase efficiency and reduce costs, and they recognized that delegating certain tasks to paralegals could help to achieve this goal.
Additionally, the rise of the consumer movement in the 1960s led to an increased demand for legal services among the general public, which further increased the need for paralegals to assist with the workload of lawyers.
The first formal programs for paralegals were established in the 1960s, with the goal of providing specialized training to individuals who wanted to work in this new and rapidly growing field. These programs typically included coursework in legal research, legal writing, and other relevant areas, and they were designed to prepare students for the unique challenges of working as paralegals.
The recognition of paralegalism as a separate legal occupation was further solidified by the American Bar Association (ABA), which adopted guidelines for the education and training of paralegals in the 1970s. The ABA's guidelines set the standard for the profession and helped to ensure that paralegals received the education and training they needed to provide high-quality support to lawyers and their clients.
To know more about refer paralegal to-
brainly.com/question/25507890#
#SPJ11
when will the social security fairness act be voted on
The voting over the Social Security (Fairness) Act is expected to be done within the hearings in the year 2023.
The Social Security Act is an act that was brought into enforcement with the primary intention of making the legal protections for the society with a sense of security towards all the sections within the American jurisdiction. Moreover, there are a few additions made into the act by enforcing the Social Security (Fairness) Act for the betterment of the security systems in the legal authorities.
Learn more about social security here:
https://brainly.com/question/24989692
#SPJ4
Stanley works for the National EMS Management System (Stanley works for the National EMS Management System (NEMSMA). He is primarily responsible for handling various administrative and clinical functions. Which level of competency does Stanley work at in NEMSMA? A. executive officer B. managing officer C. entry-level officer D. supervisory officer). He is primarily responsible for handling various administrative and clinical functions. Which level of competency does Stanley work at in NEMSMA? A. executive officer B. managing officer C. entry-level officer D. supervisory officer
The level of competency Stanley work in NEMSMA is a managing officer. Thus the correct option is B.
What is competency?Competency is referred to skills which differentiated a person from others. The competency of an individual decides the effciency of performing any task in order to delegate any work.
A manager is a person who oversees a project and is accountable for allocating resources, monitoring the project's development, and ensuring that it is completed on schedule in order to fulfill the organization's mission and goals.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about managers, here:
brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ1
if voir dire reveals that a juror is biased, that juror is excluded for
A challenge for cause needs a court to be convinced that a prospective juror has a bias that precludes impartiality; a peremptory challenge, on the other hand, gives counsel enormous freedom by enabling the dismissal of jurors without explanation or evidence of potential impartiality.
The court ruled in Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712 (1986), that a peremptory challenge cannot be used to discriminate against and remove potential jurors based on gender, color, ethnicity, or religion.
Implied bias is the process through which the court determines if a juror has a relationship with one of the parties in the case that would impair their capacity to sit as an impartial juror.
Learn more about to juror
https://brainly.com/question/15359272
#SPJ4
which group are the most likely to be victims of homicide?
Both as perpetrators and victims of homicide, black people are overrepresented. Males implicated in homicides exhibit more pronounced racial disparities than females do.
40% of deaths involving poison, narcotics, drowning, and asphyxiation are caused by female perpetrators. Teenagers are among the groups most at danger of becoming victims, but they are not the ones who voice this worry the most. In actuality, those under the age of 20 have a nearly ten-fold higher risk of becoming victims of crime than those over the age of 65. The majority of violent crimes are committed by teenagers and young adults. Older persons are frequently the targets of frauds, purse snatching, pocket picking, check theft, and crimes perpetrated in long-term care facilities. The likelihood of poor Americans becoming victims of property and violent crime. The majority of victims of violence were adults between the ages of 25 and 34, who also represented 31% of all victims of violence. But homicide victims among people aged 18 to 24 were 2.5 times more likely than those aged 12 to 17, and more than twice as likely as those aged 25 to 34.
Learn more about homicide here :
https://brainly.com/question/30297598
#SPJ4
Do you believe the insanity defense should be allowed? Why or why not? Should all states be required to adopt "guilty, but mentally ill" or "guilty, but insane" statutes? response needs to be 350-500 words
Explanation:
The insanity defense is a legal concept that allows defendants to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions because they were legally insane at the time of the crime. The defense is based on the idea that individuals who are suffering from a mental illness or disability should not be punished for criminal acts that were a direct result of their illness or disability.
There is debate over the use of the insanity defense and whether or not it should be allowed. Some argue that it is necessary to provide a mechanism for individuals who are mentally ill to receive the appropriate treatment and support rather than punishment. However, others believe that the insanity defense is too often abused and used as a loophole for criminals to avoid punishment.
As for the requirement of all states to adopt "guilty but mentally ill" or "guilty but insane" statutes, it is a complex issue. On one hand, having consistent standards across the country could provide clearer guidelines and more predictable outcomes. On the other hand, states may have different needs and priorities, and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective.
It is also worth noting that the insanity defense is just one aspect of the criminal justice system and addressing broader issues such as access to mental health resources, support for individuals with mental illness, and the role of the criminal justice system in addressing mental health may be more effective in reducing crime and improving outcomes for those who are mentally ill.
In conclusion, the insanity defense is a complex and controversial issue, with arguments for and against its use. While the idea of having consistent standards across all states may seem appealing, it is important to consider the unique needs and priorities of each state when making decisions about the criminal justice system.
look up hess' law and discuss how this experiment is an illustration
Hess's Law states that the heat absorbed or released during a chemical reaction is the same, regardless of the number of steps or the sequence of the reaction. This law is based on the principle of energy conservation, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.
The experiment to illustrate Hess's Law involves determining the heat change that occurs in a chemical reaction by using two different methods. First, the heat change is determined for the reaction as it occurs in one step. Then, the reaction is broken down into several steps and the heat change is determined for each step.
The total heat change for all the steps is then calculated and compared to the heat change obtained from the one-step reaction. If Hess's Law is correct, the two results should be the same.
To read more about hess' law, visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30024746
#SPJ11
has krakauer so far supported these assertions about mccandless? what is some of the evidence he presents?
Yes, Jon Krakauer has supported the assertions made about Christopher McCandless. Krakauer paints a picture of a man who was deeply idealistic, fearless, and driven by a spirit of adventure.
He presents evidence of this by citing McCandless’s affinity for nature and his willingness to travel alone and into the unknown wilderness. He also provides McCandless’s diary entries to show his increasing desperation and his eventual understanding of the consequences of his actions.
Krakauer also provides interviews with McCandless’s family and friends, who attest to his idealistic nature and propensity for adventure. All of this evidence suggests that the assertions about McCandless were accurate, and Krakauer provides ample support for this in his book.
know more about interviews here
https://brainly.com/question/15128068#
#SPJ11
the law creates a system to resolve disputes by recognizing legal and interests of the parties involved.
The law creates a system to resolve the disputes of the parties by recognizing the legal rights as well as the interests of the involved parties.
The legal rights may be termed or referred to as the rights that are provided to a specific set of person under the lawful documents related to the same. These rights are completely regulated, and provide protection to those who hold them. Moreover, the legal rights are also under the scrutiny of the government bodies, formed specifically for the purpose.
Learn more about legal rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ4
Complete question
the law creates a system to resolve disputes by recognizing legal _______ and interests of the parties involved.
what are some of the major principles of psychological perspectives on criminal ebhavior
There are several major psychological perspectives on criminal behavior that help explain why people engage in criminal activities. Criminal behavior refers to actions that are illegal and punishable by law. Understanding criminal behavior is an important field of study within psychology.
One major principle of psychological perspectives on criminal behavior is the biological perspective. This perspective suggests that criminal behavior is influenced by genetic and biological factors such as brain function and structure.
Another major principle is the psychodynamic perspective, which views criminal behavior as being influenced by unconscious motives and conflicts. This perspective emphasizes the role of early childhood experiences and relationships in shaping criminal behavior.
The behavioral perspective on criminal behavior views criminal behavior as being learned through observation, reinforcement, and punishment. This perspective suggests that criminal behavior is a result of environmental factors and can be modified through behavior modification techniques.
The cognitive perspective on criminal behavior focuses on the thought processes and decision-making of individuals who engage in criminal behavior. This perspective suggests that criminal behavior is a result of cognitive distortions and irrational thinking.
Finally, the social learning theory perspective on criminal behavior suggests that criminal behavior is learned through the observation of others, as well as through positive reinforcement and punishment. This perspective emphasizes the role of social and environmental factors in shaping criminal behavior.
To learn more about criminal behavior refer here
https://brainly.com/question/28952454#
#SPJ11