The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The Eastern province of the Roman Empire did not decline as drastically. Based on what I've read, I think the Western province fell because of the following reasons.
There was just non one reason for the fall of the Western Roman Empire. I was more the consequence of a series of events.
One of the most important was the invasions of Barbaric and German tribes. In 476, the German leader and his troops invaded Rome and capture the city. Rome had fallen.
Another factor was that the western portion of the Roman Empire was so vast, that the Emperor lost control of those faraway territories. We have also to consider a series of economic problems at that time. Constant fights caused the overspending of resources due to the war.
Under these circumstances, political and economic corruption spread through Roman politics and this erode Rome from the inside.
PLEASEEE HELPPP
Which does not accurately describe the Treaty of Versailles?
It called for the creation of the League of Nations.
It angered many Germans.
It blamed Germany for World War I.
It set the stage for long-term peace.
Answer:
It set the stage for long-term peace.
Explanation:
Took the test :D
In a mortgage, the amount of money borrowed is called the
interest
fee
point
principal
Answer:
principal
Explanation:
*principal - the amount of money borrowed.
*interest - the money paid for the privilege of using the lender's principal.
*term - the period of time over which the loan is repaid.
13 POINTS AND WILL VOTE BRAINEST
How were the British initially treated by the Mughal government in India?
Answer:
Explanation:
How were the British initially treated by the Mughal government in India? Mughal emperor signed a treaty that gave the British rights to reside/build trading forts within India's coastal cities. They were allowed to trade within the Bengal region, later waved taxes on trade.