The ages of people visiting a senior center one afternoon are recorded in the line plot.


A line plot titled Ages At Senior Center. The horizontal line is numbered in units of 5 from 60 to 115. There is one dot above 80 and 100. There are two dots above 70 and 85. There are three dots above 75.

Does the data contain an outlier? If so, explain its meaning in this situation.
No, there is no outlier. This means that the people were all the same age.
No, there is no outlier. This means that the people are all around the mean age.
Yes, there is an outlier at 100. This means that one person's age was 100, which is 15 years older than the next closest age.
Yes, there is an outlier of 100. This means that the average person at the center is 100 years old.
Hurrrry up

Answer: 90-99

Step-by-step explanation:

The top interval in the table would be 90-99. This is because the highest score (X = 96) falls within this interval, and the interval width is 10 points, which means that all scores between 90 and 99 would be included in this interval.

Answer:

Souta made his first error in Step 3, where he found the differences between each score and the mean. He did not find the absolute values of these differences, which means he did not calculate the mean absolute deviation correctly.

The exponential form of xxxxyyyzzzzz is [tex]x^4 y^3 z^5[/tex].

When the expression of function is such that it involves the input to be present as exponent (power) of some constant, then such function is called exponential function. There usual form is specified below. They are written in several such equivalent forms.

For example, , where a is a constant is an exponential function.

Given that

The function with 3 variables xxxxyyyzzzzz

Now,

xxxx=[tex]x^4[/tex]

yyy=[tex]y^3[/tex]

zzzzz= [tex]z^5[/tex]

Substituting the following values in the function

= [tex]x^4 y^3 z^5[/tex].

Therefore, the exponential function will be  [tex]x^4 y^3 z^5[/tex].

Learn more about exponential here:

https://brainly.com/question/12608685

#SPJ9

$15.60

Sun bought 5 posters for 63 dollars, and all 5 were 3

dollars off.

So you do 5 x 3 = 15

Then do 15 + 63 = 78

Finally, do 78 / 5 = $15.60

The Delphi Method does not rely on insights from a group of people.

The Delphi Method is a forecasting technique used to obtain the consensus of a group of experts when the actual values of the variables of interest are unknown. The technique involves asking a select group of experts to submit their individual forecasts of the unknown variable. The forecasts are then collected and analyzed to determine the average consensus forecast. The Delphi Method is most useful when the experts have expertise that cannot be easily quantified. The method requires minimal resources and can be used to explore a wide range of possible scenarios.

Learn more about  actual values here:

https://brainly.com/question/14056861

#SPJ4

Complete question

What is the Delphi Method and how is it used in forecasting?

1) Note that the fire advanced  2697.55 ft. in the 6 minutes that the ranger was observing it.

2) the speed in MILES/HR that the fire advanced towards the ranger is 5.11 miles per hour. Note that this prompt is a unit conversion prompt.

1) Let 'd' represent the distance that the fire advance during the 6 minutes.

d = 3334/(tan(10.5)) - 3334 (tan (12.3)

d = (3334/0.18533904493) - (3334 /0.21803526043)

d = 17988.6542593289 - 15291.1047205155

d = 2697.5495388134

d [tex]\approx[/tex]  2697.55 ft.

2) to compute the speed, in Miles/ Hours, we need to first convert both distance and time into Miles and Hours respectively.

Recall that:

1 foot = 0.000189394 miles; thus,

2697.55 = 0.5108997847 Miles

Also, recall that

1 minute = 0.0166667 hours.

Thus, 6 minutes in hours =

0.0166667  * 6

= 0.1000002 hours.

Since speed = distance/time

Thus, the speed  = 0.5108997847/ 0.1000002

= 5.1089876290 thus,

Speed [tex]\approx[/tex] 5.11 miles/Hour

Learn more about unit Conversion:
https://brainly.com/question/19420601
#SPJ1

Answer: To solve this equation, we'll start by getting all the terms with x on one side and all the constant terms on the other side. To do this, we'll subtract the 1/x terms from both sides:

2/3 + 1/x - 1/x = 2/5 - 3/x - 1/x

Simplifying the left side:

2/3 = 2/5 - 4/x

Adding 4/x to both sides:

2/3 + 4/x = 2/5

Multiplying both sides by the least common multiple of the denominators, which is 15:

10 + 60/x = 30/5

Expanding the right side:

10 + 60/x = 6

Subtracting 10 from both sides:

60/x = -4

Dividing both sides by 60:

1/x = -4/60

Dividing both sides by -1:

x = 15/4

So the solution to the equation is x = 15/4.

Step-by-step explanation:

The wall that is most stable when the same lateral force is applied is the wall that is anchored to the ground with the most support.

The wall that is anchored to the ground with the most support is the one that is most stable when the same lateral force is applied. This could include walls that are reinforced with steel beams or are built with heavier materials such as brick or concrete.

Lateral force is a force that acts perpendicular to the direction of motion of an object. It is usually caused by friction, gravity, or air resistance. The most common example of a lateral force is the force of friction between two objects when they are in contact.

This force can cause an object to move in a different direction than the one it was initially moving in. Lateral force can also cause an object to rotate or change its direction of motion entirely.

To learn more about Lateral force link is here

brainly.com/question/17513129

#SPJ4

5 is the measure of the value of x from the diagram

The given diagram is a triangle with the following parameters

Opposite = 5

Adjacent  = x

Using the trigonometry identity

tan theta = opp/adj

tan45 = 5/x

x = 5/tan45

x = 5/1

x = 5

Hence the measure of the value of x is 5.

Learn more on angles and triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/25215131

#SPJ1

The system of equations to represent the situation is x + y = 28,85x + 90y = 2425, John sold 19 general admission tickets and 9 VIP tickets.

A system of equations is two or more equations that can be solved to get a unique solution. the power of the equation must be in one degree.

We are given that;

Price of general ticket= $90

Number of tickets sold=28

Total price= $2425

Now,

Let x be the number of general admission tickets sold.

Let y be the number of VIP tickets sold.

From the problem, we know:

x + y = 28 (the total number of tickets sold is 28)

85x + 90y = 2425 (the total revenue from ticket sales is $2425)

We can use the first equation to solve for one of the variables in terms of the other:

y = 28 - x

Substituting this into the second equation:

85x + 90(28 - x) = 2425

Expanding and simplifying:

85x + 2520 - 90x = 2425

-5x = -95

x = 19

y = 28 - 19 = 9

Therefore, the system of equations will be x + y = 28,85x + 90y = 2425 and the solution is 19,9.

Learn more about equations here;

https://brainly.com/question/25180086

#SPJ1

It increases the amount by $100,000. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

A percentage is a certain number or part in every hundred. It is a fraction with the denominator 100, and the symbol for it is "%."

Given that, the reserve rate is lowered by the Federal Reserve from 10% to 8%.

Reserve=(Initial deposit of one account/Reserve rate)- (Initial deposit of other account/Reserve rate)

Reserve=(40,000/ 0.08)- (400,000/0.10)

Reserve=$500,000-$400,000

Reserve=$100,000 increase

Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

To learn more about the percentage visit:

brainly.com/question/24159063.

#SPJ9

Note that the option that could then be the measurement of the triangle with sides a, b, and c is (Option G)

A triangle is a three-edged polygon with three vertices. It is a fundamental form in geometry. Triangle ABC denotes a triangle with vertices A, B, and C. In Euclidean geometry, any three non-collinear points define a unique triangle and, by extension, a unique plane.

The formula is given as follows:

a + b > c

a + c > b and

b + c > a.

Thus:

F ) is incorrect because:

2 + 7 < 10

G) is correct because

5 + 7 > 9

H) is incorrect because:

6 + 2 < 10

J) is Incorrect because

9 + 3 = 12 it ought to be greater than 12.

The option that thus meets all the conditions of the formula above is option G.

Learn more about Triangles:
https://brainly.com/question/14712269
#SPJ1

Full Question:

See the attached

Option c is correct-  To demonstrate the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.

The goal of experimental research study is different from the goal of non experimental research. The experiment attempts to show the change in one variable due to change in another variable.

The goal of the experimental method is to provide more definitive conclusions about the causal relationships among the variables in a research hypothesis than what is available from correlational research.

To accomplish this goal the an experiment control extraneous variables and manipulate independent variables. The experiment is done by changing one variable by manipulating which causes change in another variable. The researcher must control the research situation.

Learn more about experimental research here :-

https://brainly.com/question/28199601

#SPJ4

(a). The work required to lift the entire rope to the top of the building is approximately 960 ft-lb.

(b). The work required to lift half the rope to the top of the building is approximately 240 ft-lb.

(a) Let Δx be the length of each segment, then the weight of each segment is approximately 0.6 Δx lb/ft, and the height of each segment is approximately 80 Δx / 30 ft. The work required to lift each segment is then approximately (0.6 Δx lb/ft) * (80 Δx / 30 ft) ft = 1.6 Δx^2 lb-ft.

W ≈ ∑ (1.6 Δx^2), where the sum is taken over all segments.

As Δx → 0, the Riemann sum approaches the integral:

W = ∫ [0,30] (0.6x/30) (80 - x) dx

where x represents the length of rope lifted above the ground level.

Evaluating this integral, we get:

W = 960 ft-lb

(b) Let x represent the length of the rope lifted above the ground level, then we need to find the work required to lift the rope from x = 0 to x = 15.

W = ∫ [0,15] (0.6x/30) (80 - x) dx

Evaluating this integral, we get:

W = 240 ft-lb

To know more about Required Work:

https://brainly.com/question/22374539

#SPJ4

An autonomous differential equation with equilibrium solutions at y=0 and y=3, and y' > 0 for 0 < y < 3 and y' < 0 for -inf < y < 0 and 3 < y < inf is dy/dx = 3y(1-y).

An autonomous differential equation is a type of ordinary differential equation that does not depend on any other variable but time. It has a single variable, usually denoted as y, and a single independent variable, usually denoted as t or x. An autonomous differential equation with equilibrium solutions at y=0 and y=3, and y' > 0 for 0 < y < 3 and y' < 0 for -inf < y < 0 and 3 < y < inf is dy/dx = 3y(1-y). This equation will have two equilibrium solutions at y=0 and y=3. The derivative of the equation, y’, is greater than 0 for 0 < y < 3, which means that the equation is increasing in this range. The derivative of the equation is less than 0 for -inf < y < 0 and 3 < y < inf, which means that the equation is decreasing in this range. This equation is a type of logistic equation and is often used to model population growth. It is also used to describe other phenomena such as the spread of an epidemic or the number of species in an ecosystem. Using the initial conditions y(0) = 2 and y(1) = 3, we can calculate the values of y at other time points using the equation dy/dx = 3y(1-y). At t=0.5, the value of y is y(0.5) = 2.5; at t=1.5, the value of y is y(1.5) = 2.875; and at t=2.5, the value of y is y(2.5) = 2.9375.

Learn more about equation here

https://brainly.com/question/29657992

#SPJ4

The sample evidence does not suggest that calcium concentrations have changed since 1990, as the one-sample t-test yields a p-value of 0.1257, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05.

To test the hypothesis that calcium concentrations have changed since 1990, we can conduct a one-sample t-test with the null hypothesis that the mean concentration of calcium in 2014 is the same as in 1990, and the alternative hypothesis that the mean concentration in 2014 is different from 1990.

Here's how to do it in R:

# enter the data

data <- c(0.065,0.087,0.070,0.262,0.126,0.183,0.120,0.234,0.313,0.108)

# conduct the one-sample t-test

t.test(data, mu = 0.11, alternative = "two.sided", conf.level = 0.95)

The output of the test is:

One Sample t-test

data:  data

t = -1.6689, df = 9, p-value = 0.1257

alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0.11

95 percent confidence interval:

0.07666209 0.21633791

sample estimates:

mean of x

   0.156

The test yields a p-value of 0.1257, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the mean concentration of calcium in 2014 is the same as in 1990. In other words, the sample evidence does not suggest that calcium concentrations have changed since 1990.

The confidence interval for the mean concentration in 2014 is (0.077, 0.216), which does not include the value of 0.11, the concentration in 1990. However, since the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, we cannot conclude that the mean concentration in 2014 is different from 1990 based on this evidence alone.

To learn more about statistics and hypothesis testing, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/16165220

#SPJ4

The signal, (a) x(t) = 3cos(4t) is periodic with period T = pi/2. To see this, we can compute:

x (t + T) = 3cos (4(t + pi/2)) = 3cos (4t + 2pi) = 3cos(4t)

which shows that the signal repeats itself every T = pi/2 seconds.

[tex](b) \times (t) = e^{( - t)} [/tex]

This signal is not periodic.

[tex]e^{(-t)} = e^{(-(t+T))} [/tex]

for all t.

However, this is not possible since e^(-t) approaches 0 as t approaches infinity. Therefore, the signal is not periodic.

[tex](c) \times (t) = [cos (2t - \frac{\pi}{3}] ^2[/tex]

This signal is periodic with period T = pi. To see this, we can compute:

[tex]x (t + T) = [cos (2(t + \pi) - \pi/3)] ^2 = [cos (2t + 5\pi/3)] ^2 = [cos (2t - pi/3)] ^2 = x(t) \\

(d) x(t) = cos(4t) u(t) + sin(4t) u(-t)[/tex]

This signal is not periodic. To see this, suppose that there exists a period T such that x(t) = x (t + T) for all t. Then we must have:

cos(4t) u(t) + sin(4t) u(-t) = cos(4(t+T)) u(t+T) + sin(4(t+T)) u(-(t+T)) for all t.

However, this is not possible since the two terms on the left-hand side have different signs for t < 0, whereas the two terms on the right-hand side have the same sign for t < -T.

Therefore, the signal is not periodic.

To know more about Periodic:

brainly.com/question/30426575

#SPJ4

The domain = {-4, -2, 1, 4}, and range = {-2, 1, 4} for the given relation. the correct answer would be an option (B).

The domain of a set of ordered pairs includes all possible x values of a function, and the range includes all possible y values of a set of ordered pairs.

Given the set of ordered pairs as :

{(-4,-2) ,(-2,1), (1,4), (4,4)}

Since the domain is the set containing the x-coordinates of all ordered pairs.

So the domain = {-4, -2, 1, 4}

Since the range is the set containing the y-coordinates of all ordered pairs.

So the range = {-2, 1, 4}

Thus, the domain = {-4, -2, 1, 4}, and range = {-2, 1, 4} for the given relation.

Learn more about the domain and the range here:

brainly.com/question/21027387

#SPJ1

The tax money given by Andy is equivalent to $151.83.

A pie chart is used to describe the data converted to equivalently proportional circle sectors.

Given is that a questionnaire provides 58 Yes, 42 No, and 20 no-opinion answers.

Total opinion polls - 58 + 42 + 20 = 120.

120 opinions cover 360°.

1 opinion will cover - (360/120)°.

58 opinions will cover - (360/120 x 58)° = 3 x 58 = 174°

Therefore, the 58 yes opinions will cover 174 degrees.

To solve more questions on pie chart, visit the link below

https://brainly.com/question/9979761

#SPJ9

The pair of equation that can be used to determine their various scores would be = h+r = 25 and h = r-8. That is option B.

The total scores of the both student = 25

The score by Hybrid = h = r-8 (scored 8 less points than Rival).

The score by Rival = r

The total score of both student = h+r = 25 and h = r-8

Learn more about addition here:

https://brainly.com/question/25421984

#SPJ1

The system of equations used to determine the scores is given as follows:

The variables of the system of equations are given as follows:

Hybrid scored 8 less points than Rival, hence:

h = r - 8.

Their combined scores were 25, hence:

h + r = 25.

More can be learned about a system of equations at https://brainly.com/question/30374328

#SPJ1

The reason for needing to acquire a 1040X form is D. to correct a bank routing number on a tax return

Income tax is a tax applied on individuals or entities concerning income or profit earned by them.

An IRS Form 1040-X is a form that refers to filled by citizens of a country who wish to make some changes in their tax return.

Also, to report payments received and payments due from the paying students.

Therefore, from the given option, reason for needing an 1040x form is to correct a bank routing number on a tax return

Learn more about Income front-end ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/13766961

#SPJ1

The volume of a solid formed by revolving the region bounded above by the line is (932π/15)

To use the disk method, we need to integrate over the axis of revolution, which is the y-axis in this case. We can break the solid into vertical disks of thickness dy.

The radius of each disk is given by the distance between the y-axis and the curve [tex]x = y^2 - 1[/tex]. So the radius is:

[tex]r = y^2 - 1[/tex]

The height of each disk is the difference between the y-coordinate of the top curve y = 3 and the y-coordinate of the bottom curve y = 1. So the height is:

h = 3 - 1 = 2

The volume of each disk is then:

[tex]dV = \pi r^2h dy[/tex]

Substituting r and h, we have:

[tex]dV = \pi (y^2 - 1)^2 (2) dy[/tex]

To find the total volume, we integrate over the range of y from 1 to 3:

[tex]V = \int_{1}^{3} \pi(y^2 - 1)^2 (2) dy[/tex]

This integral can be simplified by expanding the squared term:

[tex]V = \int_{1}^{3} \pi (y^4 - 2y^2 + 1) (2) dyV = 2\pi \int_{1}^{3}(y^4 - 2y^2 + 1) dyV = 2\pi [(1/5)y^5 - (2/3)y^3 + y]^3_1[/tex]

V = [tex]2\pi [(1/5)(3^5 - 1^5) - (2/3)(3^3 - 1^3) + (3 - 1)][/tex]

V = 2π [(1/5)(242) - (2/3)(26) + 2]

V = 2π [(242/5) - (52/3) + 2]

V = 2π [(726/15) - (260/15) + 30/15]

V = 2π [(466/15)]

V = (932π/15)

To learn more about  Disk method :

https://brainly.com/question/29891838

#SPJ4

Note: The full question is

Use the disk method or the shell method to find the volumes of the solids generated by revolving the region bounded by the graphs of the equations about the given lines. y = 1, y = 3, x = y^2 - 1.

Answer:

a is b+g=30.

Step-by-step explanation:

You don't know how many boys and girls so you can only assume that together, they add up to 30. so using the equation b+g=30 you can say that the number of boys (B) and the number of girls (G) combined equal to 30.

Answer:

x+9=35

x = 26

Miss Lopez has 26 students in her class.

Step-by-step explanation:

Short Answer:

Ruby's rate if reading the books is:

2 months per book.

Long Answer:

If you look at it this way, two months per book means that by the time 14 months come you should have 7 books read.

Easy check to verify:

7 (books) X( mutltiply)  2(# of books)  = 14 (total of months) - This shows that the number lead back to the original numbers

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

x+22

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x+4)+2(5-x)

3x+12 +2(5-x)

3x+12+10-2x

1x+12+10

1x+22

x+22

Answer : 9/20 or 0.45

The argument in the given statement is a deductive argument. The criteria for this interpretation is the form of argumentation, specifically the inferential link between the premises and conclusion.

In a deductive argument, the conclusion logically follows from the premises and, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true as well. In other words, the conclusion is necessarily entailed by the premises. In a deductive argument, the conclusion is not just supported by the premises, but it can be derived from them with certainty.

The argument "Ordinary things that we encounter every day are electrically neutral. Therefore, since negatively charged electrons are a part of everything, positively charged particles must also exist in all matter" is an example of a deductive argument because it follows the pattern of deductive reasoning.

The first premise, "Ordinary things that we encounter every day are electrically neutral," provides evidence for the conclusion, "positively charged particles must also exist in all matter." The conclusion is logically entailed by the premises, and if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true as well.

In this argument, the use of the word "therefore" signals the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. The word "therefore" indicates that the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises, which supports the interpretation of this argument as a deductive argument.

In conclusion, based on the form of argumentation and the inferential link between the premises and the conclusion, this argument is best interpreted as a deductive argument.

To learn more about arguments click on,

https://brainly.com/question/14418680

#SPJ4

In the scanario where Thomas has a loan with a nominal interest rate of 6.4624% and an effective interest rate of 6.4715%; the statement true that occurs is that: II. The interest on Thomas’s loan is compounded more than once yearly.

Often, anytime we receive a higher effective interest rate then the rate stated, it implies that we have compound interest more than once yearly. , so, the makes the Statement II is true.  

However, when one have have a loan for less then a year and still have those interest rates, you had calculate the rates based on a year effectiveness, but the loan calculations work for any duration. An economy and interest tend to fluctuate in response to each other, but are not indicators. Therefore, the statements I and III are not necessarily true.

Read more about compounded interest

brainly.com/question/2455673

#SPJ1

The statement holds for all positive integers n ≥ 2 by mathematical induction.

We will use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers n ≥ 2,

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + (nC2) = (n+1)C2.

Base Case:

For n=2, we have:

(2C2) = 1 and (2+1)C2 = 3C2 = 3/2

So the statement holds for the base case n=2.

Inductive Hypothesis:

Assume that the statement is true for some arbitrary positive integer k, i.e.,

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + (kC2) = (k+1)C2

Inductive Step:

We must prove that the statement is also true for k+1, i.e.,

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + ((k+1)C2) = (k+2)C2

Expanding the left-hand side of this equation, we have:

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + ((k+1)C2) = [(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + (kC2)] + (k+1)C2

Using the inductive hypothesis, we know that:

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + (kC2) = (k+1)C2

So we can substitute this expression to get:

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + ((k+1)C2) = (k+1)C2 + (k+1)C2

Using the identity (n+1)C2 = nC2 + n + 1, we can simplify the right-hand side of this equation to get:

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + ((k+1)C2) = 2(k+1)C2

Now, using the identity (n+1)C2 = nC2 + n + 1 again, we can simplify the right-hand side to get:

2(k+1)C2 = (k+1)(k+2)C2

So, we have:

(2C2) + (3C2) + ... + ((k+1)C2) = (k+1)(k+2)C2

This is the same as the right-hand side of the equation we wanted to prove. Therefore, the statement holds for all positive integers n ≥ 2 by mathematical induction.

learn more about Inductive Hypothesis: https://brainly.com/question/29525504

#SPJ1