It is true to say that county children and youth agency is responsible for investigating suspected child abuse - child protective services; and assessing the need for general protective services.
Child misuse (likewise called kid peril or kid abuse) is physical, sexual, as well as mental abuse or disregard of a kid or kids, particularly by a parent or a guardian. Child misuse might incorporate any demonstration or inability to act by a parent or a guardian that outcomes in real or likely mischief to a youngster and can happen in a kid's home, or in the associations, schools, or networks the kid cooperates with.
The terms child misuse and kid abuse are frequently utilized conversely, albeit a few scientists make a qualification between them, regarding kid abuse as an umbrella term to cover disregard, double-dealing, and dealing.
During current stage, the organization gets reports of misuse or disregard from the local area and behaviors examinations to survey the wellbeing and hazard of all kids in the home. The County Children and Youth Agency (CCYA) gets references in two ways - straightforwardly to the office or through ChildLine.
To know more about child abuse,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/9850217
#SPJ4
The Constitution is more specific about the __________ states do not have than about those they possess.Select one:a. grantsb. entitlementsc. powersd. authorities
The right answer is "powers." The United States Constitution is more detailed about the "prohibited powers" that states are not allowed to exercise than it is concerning the powers that states do.
The federalist system of governance established by the Constitution divides authority between the federal and state governments. The Constitution grants particular authorities to the federal government while reserving all other powers to the states. The 10th Amendment to the Constitution declares that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor forbidden by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This division of powers is described in that clause. In other words, the Constitution is clear about the powers that the federal government has, and states cannot exercise those powers. However, the Constitution is not as specific about the powers that states have. This has led to ongoing debates and legal disputes over the years about the exact extent of state powers.
Learn more about federalist system here:
https://brainly.com/question/29788676
#SPJ4
The 14th Amendment protects both civil rights and civil liberties.
Describe the difference between civil rights and civil liberties. Compare
and contrast at least 2 Supreme court cases and how they have cited the
14th amendment to protect civil rights or civil liberties.
The difference between civil rights and civil liberties is since they deal with legal protections, civil rights aren't included in the bill of rights. A civil liberty refers to individual liberties that are shielded from governmental hindrance.
What are civil liberties?
Governments pledge not to circumscribe civil liberties through the constitution, law, or judicial interpretation without following due process. Civil liberties may include the freedom of heart, of the press, of religion, of expression, of assembly, of security and liberty, of speech, of sequestration, of equal treatment under the law and of due process, of a fair trial, and of life, though the description of the term varies from country to country.
Know more about civil liberties - brainly.com/question/13625212
#SPJ4
criminal law may be classified into which two major categories?
Answer:
Criminal law is classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Criminal law can be classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Substantive criminal law defines the types of conduct that are considered crimes and sets out the punishment for those crimes.
It is concerned with the substantive elements of a crime, such as the mental state and the physical act that must be proven in order to establish criminal liability. Substantive criminal law also specifies the defenses that may be raised to a criminal charge and the circumstances under which a defendant may be held criminally responsible.
Procedural criminal law, on the other hand, deals with the process by which criminal cases are handled in the criminal justice system.
It establishes the rules and procedures that must be followed by law enforcement officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and juries in the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of criminal cases.
Procedural criminal law also protects the constitutional rights of criminal defendants, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to remain silent, and the right to an attorney.
To know more about Criminal law refer to-
brainly.com/question/1205493#
#SPJ11
from the discussion in chapter 4, what types of international systems have existed in world politics (from pp.106-110)?
The types of international systems that have existed in world politics are democracy, authoritarian and monarchies.
What is the difference between democracy and monarchies?
A monarch who is a member of the ruling family is in charge of the monarchy. Unlike democracy, which is a form of government where the people elect the government. In a monarchy, the monarch is the only one who makes decisions, while in a democracy, the government frequently takes opinions from the populace into consideration.
What is authoritarian?
A governing system known as authoritarianism grants a strong, centralized control and constrained political freedoms to the general populace.
Know more about democracy - brainly.com/question/28158695
#SPJ4
prove the absorption law by universal generalization, applied twice to use the double-subset property.
Prove the second absorption law from Table 1 by showing that if and are sets, then ∩ ( ∪ ) = .Proof: Often, objects of a similar nature or with a common property are collected into sets.
Each member is called an element of the set. There should be only one of each member (all members are unique). is a set, and a is an element in . Same with B and b. When we say an element a is in a set , we use the symbol ∈ to show it. Two sets can be "added" together. The union of and , denoted by ∪ , is the set of all things that are members of either or . The union ∪ of and is defined by: ∪ = { ∶ ∈ ∈ }. A new set can also be constructed by determining which members two sets have "in common". The intersection of and , denoted by ∩ , is the set of all things that are members of both A and B. If ∩ = ∅, then A and B are called disjoint. The intersection ∩ of and is defined by: ∩ = { ∶ ∈ ∈ }.When we define a set, if we take pieces of that set, we can form what is called a subset. is a subset of if and only if every element of is in . ∩ ( ∪ ) is a subset of A, is an element in ∩ ( ∪ ), also is an element in by definition of intersection. Accordingly ∩ ( ∪ ) is a subset of . Another we can write:
∈ ∩ ( ∪ ) ↔ ∈ and ∈ ∪
↔ ∈ and [ ∈ ∈ ]
↔ ∈
and so ∩ ( ∪ ) = A
For more information on intersection see:
https://brainly.com/question/9462569
#SPJ4
A woman owned 400 acres of land, half ofwhich was densely wooded and the other half ofwhich was almost entirely occupied by a largegravel pit which supplied gravel for her smalllandscaping business. A small house located onthe edge of the pit was in very poor conditionand had been vacant for many years. The womantransferred the 400 acres to her son for life,with the remainder going to a local charity onthe son’s death. Now the son wants to increasegravel production and expand the pit by tearingdown the house. He also wants to cut the treeson the wooded half and sell them for profit. Thelocal charity, holder of the remainder, sues toenjoin the son from doing any of these things.How will the court likely rule?(A) The charity can stop both the gravel mining and the tree cutting and can block thedestruction of the house.(B) The charity can stop neither the gravelmining nor the tree cutting but can blockthe destruction of the house.(C) The charity can stop the tree cutting but notthe gravel mining or the destruction of thehouse.(D) The charity can stop the gravel mining andthe tree cutting but not the destruction ofthe house because it is dangerous and unfitfor use.
The tree-cutting can be halted by the charity. On the basis of waste, the charity would sue the life renter. The removal of trees and the mining of gravel could both be voluntary waste.
A life tenant typically has the right to merely preserve the property and cannot sell any of the resources, including gravel and trees. However, there is a caveat regarding the current utilization of these resources. Since the gravel mine was already in operation when the son acquired the life estate, the preexisting use is protected, and the son is not responsible for carrying on with the gravel mining. The exception does not apply to trees though. The general rule applies, and destroying the woods would be wasteful because the site has not been used as a tree farm. The demolition of the home may be viewed as ameliorative waste since it removes enhancements to the life estate that raise its market value. Generally speaking, a life tenant is not permitted to demolish improvements just to put the land to better use. However, there is an exception when new circumstances make it reasonable to destroy the improvement. The house was in extremely bad shape and was sitting on the edge of the pit here. The house is now somewhat inadequate due to changed circumstances, making life tenant tearing it down.
Learn more about tenant here
https://brainly.com/question/14998321
#SPJ4
a plaintiff who knows there is a substantial danger associated with certain conduct and goes ahead with the dangerous activity anyway gives the tortfeasor the defense of
A plaintiff who knows there is a substantial danger associated with certain conduct and goes ahead with the dangerous activity anyway gives the tortfeasor the defense of assumption of the risk.
What is assumption of the risk?
Assumption of risk is a defense in tort law, more specifically an affirmative defense, that limits or prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages from a negligent tortfeasor if the defendant can show that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly accepted the risks at issue that were associated with the risky activity they were engaging in at the time of their injury. "Primary" assumption of risk happens when the plaintiff is aware of a specific risk and voluntarily accepts it through words or actions, absolving the defendant of its duty of care.
Know more about assumption of the risk - brainly.com/question/21897362
#SPJ4
Should young people ever be tried as adults? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
I think it would all depend on what was done for them to be tried. Like say they committed a murder in all fairness they should be tried as an adult because no one should be able to get away with murder but like for something such as stealing, like maybe picking something up at a grocery store or a gas station. That is something that could lead to them being tried as an adult but I don't think they should if it's not something serious and harmful for themselves or others.
Explanation:
Directions: The scenario presented below describes two choices, either one of which can be supported on the basis of the information given.
Your essay should consider both choices and argue for one over the other, based on the two specified criteria and the facts provided. There
is no “right” or “wrong” choice: a reasonable argument can be made for either.
BLZ Stores, an established men’s clothing retailer with a chain of stores in a major metropolitan area, is selecting a plan for expansion.
Using the facts below, write an essay in which you argue for one of the following plans over the other based on the following two criteria:
• The company wants to increase its profits.
• The company wants to ensure its long-term financial stability.
The “national plan” is to open a large number of men’s clothing stores throughout the country over a short period of time. In doing this,
the company would incur considerable debt. It would also have to greatly increase staff and develop national marketing and distribution
capabilities. Many regional companies that adopted this strategy increased their profits dramatically. A greater number tried and failed,
suffering severe financial consequences. BLZ is not well known outside its home area. Research indicates that the BLZ name is viewed
positively by those who know it. National clothing chains can offer lower prices because of their greater buying power. BLZ currently faces
increasingly heavy competition in its home region from such chains.
The “regional plan” is to increase the number and size of stores in the company’s home region and upgrade their facilities, product quality,
and service. This could be achieved for the most part with existing cash reserves. These upgrades would generally increase the prices that BLZ
charges. In one trial store in which such changes were implemented, sales and profits have increased. The local population is growing. BLZ
enjoys strong customer loyalty. Regional expansion could be accomplished primarily using BLZ’s experienced and loyal staff and would allow
continued reliance on known and trusted suppliers, contractors, and other business connections.
The regional plans for the expansion should adopt, Because the company that was accomplishing the goals, was increasing their profits and also achieving financial stability.
What is Company?A company is a collective of people. The word "company" is frequent and has numerous distinct meanings, but they are all related to gatherings or interactions of people. The most frequent usage of the word "company" is to describe a company. A corporation called Energizer manufactures and sells batteries.
As there are some regional plans there that do not preclude the BLZ. They want to expand their nationality in the future as well. therefore somehow he was not sure about the nationality plan. So they went out with the business and the national plan is also there with them.
Therefore, As a result, BLZ should adopt the regional plan for expansion.
Learn more about the Company here:
https://brainly.com/question/16237714
#SPJ1
Diego is shooting portraits of a family. He thinks he might want to include some of the images in advertisements for his photo studio, although he probably won't use them until at least one year from now. What should Diego do in this situation?
A. he should obtain a signed model release from the family members before finishing the photo session
B. he should obtain a verbal permission to use the photos from the family members before finishing the photo session
C. he should wait until he is ready to include the photos in his advertisements, then ask the family members to sign a model release
D. He doesn't need to do anything because Diego is taking the photos, he holds copyright to them and can use them however he wants
He should obtain a signed model release from the family members before finishing the photo session which include some of the images in advertisements.
What are advertisements?Advertising refers to the methods used to draw attention to a good or service. In order to attract consumers' attention, advertising seeks to highlight a good or service.
It is often used to market a particular product or service, although there are many other applications as well, with commercial advertising being the most popular.
Through "branding," which links a product name or image with particular traits in consumers' minds, commercial advertising frequently aim to boost consumption of their goods or services.
Direct-response advertising, on the other hand, is the term used to describe advertisements that aim to prompt a quick sale.
Political parties, interest groups, and governmental organizations are examples of non-commercial organizations that market more than consumer goods or services.
Learn more about advertisements, here
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
after the plaintiff has presented their evidence, a defendant may make a motion, which is granted by___.
After the plaintiff has presented their evidence, a defendant may make a motion, which is granted by directed verdict.
A trial court's decision to direct a prosecution's conviction is made after concluding that there insufficient evidence in court to allow a fair verdict to reach a different verdict. A directed verdict could well be granted by the trial court organically or in response to a plea made by either party. A move for directed verdict is a proposal that the judge direct the jury's verdict. This plea asserts that no sane juror could conclude in favour of the opposing party before the matter is presented to the jury. This motion may be submitted by either the plaintiff or the defendants. A dictated verdict is usually granted once the court decides that the applicant has not shown enough evidence to back their claim.
learn more about direct verdict here:
https://brainly.com/question/15105356
#SPJ4
What clause requires that states treat people from other states equally to their own residents?
watch the video of the thermite reaction, and then choose which of the following statements are correct for the thermite reaction.
In a thermite reaction, the reactants' internal energy is greater than the products' internal energy. Additionally, the system's enthalpy change is negative. Additionally, the system's own energy declines.
Thermite reaction is the name given to the procedure of burning aluminium and ferric oxide. This reaction is exothermic. In this process, molten iron is produced.
Al2O3 + 2 Fe(l) + Heat = Fe2O3 (s) + Al (s)
Since aluminium powder is used as the reducing agent, the thermite process can be defined as the reduction of iron oxide or any other metal oxide. Aluminothermy and the Goldschmidt thermite process are other names for it. This reaction belongs to a group of processes known as "thermite" reactions, which have been applied in industry for welding, stripping metals of their oxides, and creating incendiary devices. Heat starts the process, but it soon becomes self-sustaining.
learn more about thermite reaction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14964571
#SPJ4
Laws which regulate or curtail business monopolies or dominant financial organizations are called anti-trust laws. True or false?
Antitrust laws are rules that promote competition by restricting a firm's ability to dominate the market. This frequently entails dismantling monopolistic enterprises as well as making sure mergers and acquisitions don't excessively concentrate market power.
Additionally, cartels or groups of companies working together to restrict competition through tactics like price fixing are prohibited by antitrust laws. Antitrust law has developed into a distinct legal expertise as a result of the difficulty in determining what actions may restrict competition.
Antitrust laws were created to safeguard and encourage competition across all economic sectors.
The three key statutes in the development of antitrust law are the Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, and Sherman Act.
To learn more about anti- trust laws from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28714114
#SPJ4
case questions: what is the major legal principle of tort law that this case addresses? describe the primary legal reason that mrs. palsgraf lost her claim on appeal. how is the reasoning for the majority different from the dissent's opinion?
Tort law's main objectives are to compensate harmed individuals for wrongs committed by others, hold those responsible accountable, and deter others from carrying out damaging acts.
The obligation to exercise reasonable care that accrues from one actor to another is a key tenant of tort law. If a party violates the legal obligation of extra diligence owed to another individual or organization and losses are directly attributable to that violation, the offending party may be held legally liable for the resulting damage in a court of law.
Tort law's main objectives are to compensate harmed individuals for wrongs committed by others, hold those responsible accountable, and deter others from carrying out damaging acts.
Every person has rights and interests that are protected by the law, which is the fundamental tenet of tort law. Any action, whether intentional or not, that harms
Learn more about torts law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ4
tort law differs from criminal law in that: group of answer choices tort law compensates the injured party's loss. tort law protects the public. tort law involves legal action by governmental authorities. tort law involves a public wrong.
Tort law differs from criminal law in that a) tort law compensates the injured party's loss.
Tort law is the body of law that governs the majority of civil suits. Tort law applies to any claim that arises in civil court, with the exception of contractual disputes.
Tort law seeks to right a wrong done to a person and give relief from the unlawful conduct of others by awarding monetary damages as compensation. The original objective of tort law was to provide full restitution for proven harms.
Tort law demands individuals found at fault for causing harm to others to compensate the victims. Loss of past or future income, payment of medical expenditures, and payment for pain and suffering are examples of typical damages.
To know more about tort law:
https://brainly.com/question/4313662
#SPJ4
Correct question:
tort law differs from criminal law in that:
a) tort law compensates the injured party's loss.
b) tort law protects the public.
c) tort law involves legal action by governmental authorities.
d) tort law involves a public wrong.
True or False? the key difference between laws and ethics is that ethics carry the authority of a governing body and laws do not.
The correct answer is false. A person's ethics are the moral standards they set for themselves and their own behaviour. Laws are formalised regulations used to control society as a whole.
Law is defined as the requirements of the law that are set forth in writing and enforced by the appropriate governmental bodies, such as courts of law. The definition of ethics, on the other hand, is a set of moral principles that guide a person's behaviour while engaging with other people or the wider society. Ethics examines the concept of morality, its role in society, and moral dilemmas. The foundation of law is a set of rules and guidelines that have been developed by a community's governing body and are applicable to its residents. Law and ethics both address related concerns . According to one theory, conscience serves as the individual's (ethical) guardian for the laws that the community has developed for the preservation of itself (law).
Learn more about Ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/13402919
#SPJ4
True/Falsewhere a long-arm statute is present, a defendant need not have minimum contact with a state for that state's courts to have jurisdiction over the defendant.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
article iii of the texas constitution blank . multiple select question. a. sets the qualifications and terms of office for the executive b. sets the terms of office of members of the legislature requires c. the legislature to meet every year divides d. the legislature into two branches sets the qualifications for legislators
article iii of the texas constitution c. the legislature to meet every year divides.
FREEDOM AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY. The upkeep of our democracy and the longevity of the Union depends on the protection of the right to local self-government, which is unaffected by any State boundaries. Texas is a free and autonomous State that is only bound by the US Constitution.
Only Alabama's nor California's state constitutions are longer than Texas', which is one of the longest in the country. It stands out for covering several extremely particular subjects that many other states leave up to their legislatures, such as municipal, taxes, and property rights.
George Childress drafted the Declaration of Independence, which was inspired by the US Constitution. The Republic of Texas's Constitution was drafted with the assistance of Lorenzo de Zavala.
Learn more about the texas constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/27962072
#SPJ4
Is the primary legal responsibility of a business to comply with the law?
Yes, the primary legal responsibility of a business is to comply with the law.
Businesses are expected to operate within the legal framework of the jurisdictions in which they operate. This means that they are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including those related to taxation, employment, health and safety, environmental protection, consumer protection, and more.
Failing to comply with the law can result in legal consequences, such as fines, penalties, and even criminal charges. Moreover, it can also damage the reputation of the business and lead to loss of customers, employees, and investors.
However, businesses can also have additional ethical and social responsibilities beyond legal compliance.
They can choose to engage in socially responsible practices that go beyond legal requirements to contribute to the well-being of their stakeholders, including their employees, customers, communities, and the environment.
To know more about legal responsibility here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871792
#SPJ4
In the case, the plaintiffs may ask the Montana courts to use a long arm statute. A long arm statute:
a. can force someone to appear in a court in a state in which they do not live.
b. is established using a sliding scale test if business is an internet business.
c. can be invoked if someone has minimum contacts with a state.
d. All of these choices are correct.
In the case, the plaintiffs may ask the Montana courts to use a long arm statute. A long arm statute (d) all of these choices are correct.
In contrary to the defense, who is the individual who is being accused, the plaintiff is the party who files the litigation or the party on whose own it is filed. The phrase seems identical to petitioning in civil justice and equity, and to libelant in dockyards. In general, it also extends to equity petitioner, especially in places where law and equity are intertwined. Regardless of whether they were the plaintiff or the defendant in the lower court processes, the person that files a writ of error to review a decision or other lawsuit is usually referred to as the plaintiff in erroneously.
learn more about plaintiff here:
https://brainly.com/question/29213713
#SPJ4
The DBPR requires that a licensee provide his or her address and email and to keep them current. This information is considered
The DBPR requires that a licensee provide his or her address and email to keep them current. This information is considered the address of record.
What is DBPR?The word DBPR stands for Department of Business and Professional Regulation resides under the executive arm of government and is responsible for granting licenses to and overseeing the more than one million enterprises and professionals it regulates.
In order to communicate effectively the address and email are kept as address record so thta any information can be transferred easily and maintain the flow of interaction between Both.
Learn more about DBPR, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13164303
#SPJ1
which of the following refers to the practices whereby the responsing of the crime is diffused from the offender and blame is shifted to the victim?
The victim-blaming cycle begins when it is assumed that the victim is flawed in some way. Any attempt to transfer complete accountability from lawbreakers' to victims' shoulders is resisted by offender blame.
The recognition of the link between victimisation and crime is one of feminist criminology's biggest achievements. Research has repeatedly shown that one common trait among many female offenders is a background of victimisation of women. 32 We have more criminals when there are more laws. However, fewer offenders are in the system as a result of decriminalisation, which involves reducing or eliminating the penalties connected to certain activities. Justifiable murder and adultery are two further cases of decriminalisation. An example of victim blaming would be to say that the victim placed themselves in danger by walking home alone at night, that they were 'asking for it' since they were dressed inappropriately, or that it was their fault because they were inebriated.
To learn more about victim-blaming click the link below:
brainly.com/question/16753842
#SPJ4
Write a response discussing the traumas that victims of crime experience and ways that these traumas might be best addressed.
Answer: The victims or trauma experience unimaginable traumas, physically, and mentally. PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) is the most common disorders that crime victims experience. PTSD causes anxiety, paranoia, and flashbacks triggered by some things.
Conpensation is basically just paying people for their troubles, while they still struggle mentally in situations.
https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/firstrep/bgavoc.html this site should help , the first paragraph explains it well.
Title 42 section 1983 of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1871 permits the use of civil remedies for individuals who believe that an individual or agency acting as an Agent of the State deprives them of a Constitutional Right. The Courts have identified four (4) primary areas where law enforcement is most likely to be at risk of violations. Enter the four (4) primary areas that have been identified by the Courts.
The four primary areas where law enforcement is most likely to be at risk of violations are:
Use of force: This refers to the use of physical force by law enforcement officers, such as striking, shooting, or deploying weapons.Search and seizure: This refers to the power of law enforcement officers to search individuals, their property, and their vehicles, and seize evidence or contraband.False arrest and imprisonment: This refers to the unlawful detention of an individual by law enforcement officers, without probable cause or a warrant.Racial profiling: This refers to the practice of law enforcement officers targeting individuals for investigation, detention, or arrest based on their race, ethnicity, or national origin.What is the use of civil remedies for individuals?When one party to a contract violates the terms of the contract, the other party may be entitled to legal redress. Damages are the most common type of remedy in contract law.
Typically, damages are awarded to compensate the non-breaching party for any losses incurred as a result of the breach. However, in some cases, the court may award "expectation damages." This type of damage is awarded to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed according to the terms agreed upon.
Read more about remedies
brainly.com/question/30362943
#SPJ1
how many arrests are made in the u.s. each year for drug-law violations?
In 2020, the FBI reports there were a total of 1,155,610 arrests for all drug offenses, of which 153,696 were for sale or manufacture of any drug, and 1,001,914 were for possession of any drug.
What are FBI reports?
Each time a person is detained, issued a citation, or given a summons for a violation, the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program records it as one arrest. 28 crimes, as listed in Offense Definitions, are the subject of the arrest data collected by the UCR Program. The UCR Program no longer gathers data on runaways as of 2010 (please take notice of this). The UCR arrest statistics do not represent the total number of people who have been detained; rather, they represent the number of arrests that have been reported to the UCR Program by law enforcement agencies. This is because one person may be detained more than once throughout the course of a year.
To study more about FBI
https://brainly.com/question/29745856
#SPJ4
Terrorism:
Based on the text’s discussion, outline the major options for countering terrorist activities in our society. Are there any other strategies that may be useful? What are the limitations if any, to countering terrorist activities?
The major options for countering terrorism include:
Intelligence gathering and sharing: This involves the use of intelligence agencies to gather information on potential terrorist activities and share it with relevant stakeholders.
Law enforcement: This involves the use of police and other law enforcement agencies to prevent and respond to terrorist incidents, including the arrest and prosecution of suspected terrorists.
Military action: In some cases, military force may be used to target and eliminate terrorists and their organizations.
Counter-radicalization: This involves efforts to prevent individuals from becoming radicalized and joining terrorist groups. It can include programs aimed at promoting social and economic opportunities, education and community engagement.
Limitations to countering terrorism include:Difficulty in gathering accurate intelligence on terrorist activities.Limited resources and manpower to effectively implement counter-terrorism measures.Resistance from some quarters to the use of military force, or other measures that may infringe on civil liberties.Read more about counter-terrorism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29709616
#SPJ1
in 2008, the national research Council wanted to make the national crime victimization survey more efficient. The national research Council suggests ___
The national research Council suggests more cost-efficient and reliable estimates.
What is National Research Council?Industrial innovation, knowledge advancement, and government priorities are all supported by the NRC. We apply research and development (R&D) to over 1,000 businesses' pressing issues and opportunities each year.
In executive order 2859 dated May 11, 1918, President Wilson established the National Research Council. 1956The executive order issued by President Eisenhower that expanded the National Research Council's charter and acknowledged its significance.
Since 1933, the Philippines' National Research Council has been a Member. The Philippines' Department of Science and Technology is home to the National Research Council of the Philippines (NRCP), which serves as an advisory body to the government on matters of national interest.
To know more about Nationa Research Council, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9326634
#SPJ4
we have a list of marital statuses of all fsu faculty members. which of the following graphs can be used to display this information? group of answer choices
Graph which can be used to display martial statuses of all fsu faculty members is a)Bar chart.So,correct option is a.
A bar chart or reference diagram is a diagram or chart that gives all out information rectangular bars with levels or lengths relative to the qualities that they address.
Civil status, or martial status, are the particular choices that depict an individual's relationship with a huge other. Hitched, single, separated, and bereft are instances of common status.Civil status and martial status are terms utilized in structures, imperative records, and different reports to ask or demonstrate whether an individual is hitched or single. In the least complex settings, no further differentiation is made.
A status of hitched implies that an individual was marry in a way lawfully perceived by their locale. An individual's predetermined common status could likewise be hitched in the event that they are in a common association or customary marriage. The common status of a legitimately isolated individual is hitched.
Whether a living together couple (like in a homegrown organization) have a common status of "wedded" relies upon the conditions and the ward. Notwithstanding the individuals who have never hitched, single status applies to individuals whose relationship with a huge other isn't lawfully perceived.
Hence,correct option is a.
To know more about martial status,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/15141904
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
We have a list of marital statuses of all FSU faculty members. Which of the following graphs can be used to display this information?
a)Bar Chart
b)Histogram
c)Stemplot
d) Boxplot
how did the 12th amendment change the electoral college
12th Amendment The amendment, which was included in time for the 1804 election, specified that the electors would now have the opportunity to cast two votes: one for the President and one for the Vice President changed the electoral college.
What is electoral college?An electoral college is a group of voters chosen to choose a candidate for a certain position. Voters choose a group of electors whose sole duty it is to choose the president and vice president every four years. The Electoral College is the name for this body of electors. The method by which the American president is chosen is called the Electoral College. It was created by the U.S. Constitution with the intention of distributing the right to choose the president among the 50 states. It was created to prevent states with higher populations from deciding who would govern the country more effectively than states with lower populations.
To learn more about the electoral college click,
https://brainly.com/question/7483395
#SPJ4