Solve right triangle

EF =
FG=
Measure E =

The solution is : the number of people having blood group O and Rh positive is 37.

Here, we have,

Let's get the question first before solving...44% of the people are having blood group O and out of them, we still have 7% having Rh negative...the question says we should know the number of those having blood group and Rh positive

blood group O and Rh negative+ blood group O and Rh positive=total of blood group O

Make blood group O and Rh positive the subject of formula

Blood group O and Rh positive=total blood group O - blood group O and Rh negative

Blood group O and Rh positive=44-7

Which will give us 37

Therefore the number of people having blood group O and Rh positive is 37.

To learn more on percentage click:

brainly.com/question/13450942

#SPJ1

complete question:

44% of people have a type O blood. It’s 7% of people have type O blood and are Rh negative, What percent has type O Rh positive blood?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The average price of the pickup truck increased by 80%.

To find the percentage increase in the average price of the pickup truck, we need to calculate the difference between the 2012 and 1991 prices, divide that difference by the 1991 price, and then multiply by 100 to get the percentage increase.

First, we need to find the difference between the two prices:

$35,100 - $19,500 = $15,600

Next, we divide the difference by the 1991 price:

$15,600 / $19,500 = 0.8

Finally, we multiply by 100 to get the percentage increase:

0.8 x 100 = 80%

Therefore, the average price of the pickup truck increased by 80%.

for such more question on average price

https://brainly.com/question/25799822

#SPJ11

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

16 inchers = 128 feet

128/16=8

so 1 inch = 8 feet

Answer:

16 inches:128 feet = 1 inch:8 feet

Answer:

[tex]y = {(x - 2)}^{2} - 3[/tex]

[tex]y = {x}^{2} - 4x + 1[/tex]

b = -4 and c = 1

If the absolute value of the correlation is very close to 0, the error in prediction will be high.

This is because a correlation close to 0 indicates that there is no strong relationship between the variables, and therefore it is difficult to accurately predict one variable based on the other. A correlation value of zero or almost zero indicates that there is no significant link between the variables. A perfect correlation, or coefficient of -1.0 or +1.0, means that changes in one variable exactly anticipate changes in the other. A value of 1 indicates a direct and flawlessly positive link.

No linear relationship exists when the correlation coefficient is 0.

Learn more about correlation: https://brainly.com/question/11663530

#SPJ4

If the absolute value of the correlation is very close to 0, the error in prediction will be high. The correct answer is D.

When the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is very close to 0, it indicates a weak or negligible linear relationship between the variables being studied. In this case, the variables have little or no linear association.

A low correlation means that there is no strong linear pattern or trend in the data. As a result, it becomes difficult to make accurate predictions or estimates based on the relationship between the variables. The lack of a strong relationship means that the variability in one variable does not provide meaningful information about the variability in the other variable.

Therefore, when the absolute value of the correlation is close to 0, the error in prediction tends to be high. This means that the predicted values based on the weak correlation are likely to deviate significantly from the actual values.

The lack of a strong relationship makes it challenging to accurately estimate or predict one variable based on the other variable.  The correct answer is D.

Learn more about correlation here: brainly.com/question/20366773

#SPJ11

Thus, while a chi-square test for goodness of fit is a useful tool for assessing the overall fit of a logistic regression model, it is important to also consider other measures of model fit and to interpret the results in the context of the research question being addressed.

When testing the goodness of fit for the logistic regression model, if the obtained chi-square is less than the critical value, one would accept the null hypothesis, which states that the model fits the data well.

Know more about the chi-square test

https://brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ11

Answer:

a.)

10,000 steps

b.)

Janet - 0%

Brenda - 25%

c.)

7 days

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm unsure if this is entirely correct because I haven't done box plots in a few years. I'm sorry if I get something wrong.

The inability to recall the original random letters in the Peterson and Peterson (1959) experiment was due in part to the decay of information in short-term memory (STM).

STM has a limited capacity and duration, which means that information can be lost over time if it is not rehearsed or refreshed.

Know more about the short-term memory (STM).

https://brainly.com/question/12121626

#SPJ11

Using the ANOVA model, you can determine if the surface type has a significant impact on the speed of guineas.

Given that you are comparing the speed of guineas across three different surface types (grass, turf, and concrete), you would use an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model to analyze this data.

An ANOVA model allows you to compare the means of the speeds for each group (grass, turf, and concrete) and determine if there are any significant differences between them. The model takes into account the variability within each group and the variability between the groups to determine if the differences observed are due to chance or if they are statistically significant.

Here are the steps to perform an ANOVA analysis:

1. Collect the speed data for each guinea in the three groups (grass, turf, and concrete).
2. Calculate the means of the speeds for each group.
3. Calculate the overall mean of the speeds for all groups combined.
4. Calculate the Sum of Squares Within (SSW), which measures the variability within each group.
5. Calculate the Sum of Squares Between (SSB), which measures the variability between the groups.
6. Calculate the Mean Squares Within (MSW) and Mean Squares Between (MSB) by dividing the respective sums of squares by their degrees of freedom.
7. Calculate the F-statistic by dividing MSB by MSW.
8. Compare the F-statistic to the critical value from the F-distribution table based on the chosen level of significance (e.g., 0.05) and the degrees of freedom for the numerator and denominator.
9. If the F-statistic is greater than the critical value, you can conclude that there are significant differences between the groups' mean speeds, and further analysis can be conducted to determine which specific groups differ.

Using the ANOVA model, you can determine if the surface type has a significant impact on the speed of guineas.

To know more about "ANOVA model" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30409322#

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen test-taker will score between 470 and 530 is 0.2358 (or 23.58% when expressed as a percentage).

To solve this problem, we need to use the standard normal distribution formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
where Z is the standard score (z-score) of a given value X, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
First, we need to convert the given values of 470 and 530 to z-scores:
Z1 = (470 - 500) / 100 = -0.3
Z2 = (530 - 500) / 100 = 0.3
Next, we need to find the probability that a randomly chosen test-taker will score between these two z-scores.

We can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the area under the curve between -0.3 and 0.3.
Using a calculator or an online tool, we find that the area under the curve between -0.3 and 0.3 is approximately 0.2358.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/28832086

#SPJ11

The side lengths of the new triangle would be = 35⅖ and 15⅖.

To calculate the new lengths the formula for scale factor should be used;

That is;

Scale factor = Bigger dimensions/smaller dimensions.

Scale factor = 2/5

Smaller dimension length = 35

Smaller dimension width = 15

The bigger dimension length = 35×⅖ = 35⅖

The bigger dimension width = 15×⅖ = 15⅖

Learn more about scale factor here:

https://brainly.com/question/28339205

#SPJ1

By using these types of data, you can effectively conduct quarterly disaster recovery tests that include role-playing and introduce realism without affecting live operations.

To conduct quarterly disaster recovery tests that include role-playing and introduce as much realism as possible without affecting live operations, you should use the following types of data:

1. Non-sensitive test data: Create a set of test data that closely resembles your live data but does not contain any sensitive or confidential information. This allows you to simulate realistic scenarios without risking exposure of important information.

2. Anonymized data: If possible, use anonymized data from your actual operations. This involves removing or replacing any identifiable information to protect privacy while maintaining the overall structure and characteristics of the data.

3. Data backups: Utilize data backups to replicate your live environment. This ensures that the testing environment is as close to the live environment as possible, allowing for more accurate testing results.

4. Synthetic data: Generate synthetic data that closely mimics your live data, with similar patterns and characteristics. This can be a useful alternative if actual data is not available or suitable for testing purposes.

By using these types of data, you can effectively conduct quarterly disaster recovery tests that include role-playing and introduce realism without affecting live operations.

To know more about "Data backups" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22172618#

#SPJ11

In this hypothesis test, we compare the means to determine if there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, which states that the population means are not equal.

In a hypothesis test of difference of means for two independent populations x1 and x2, the null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between the means of the two populations. This means that any observed difference in sample means can be attributed to chance and not to a true difference in population means.

The null hypothesis (H0) in this test states that there is no significant difference between the two population means, meaning they are equal. The null hypothesis is typically denoted as H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0, where μ1 and μ2 are the population means of x1 and x2, respectively. The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, states that there is a significant difference between the means of the two populations.

To learn more about hypothesis test, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588452#

#SPJ11

The guarantee period should be approximately 30.46 months to ensure that no more than 22% of the Magic Video packages will require a refund.

To answer this question, we need to use the normal distribution and the z-score formula. The z-score formula is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the value we want to find, μ is the mean, σ is the standard deviation, and z is the z-score corresponding to the probability we want to find.

In this case, we want to find the length of the guarantee period (x) such that the probability of a computer failing during the guarantee period and getting a refund is no more than 22% (or 0.22). We know that the mean life for the computer (μ) is 25 months, and the standard deviation (σ) is 7 months.

To find the z-score corresponding to a probability of 0.22, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator. The z-score is approximately -0.81.

Now we can plug in the values we know into the z-score formula and solve for x:

-0.81 = (x - 25) / 7

-5.67 = x - 25

x = 19.33

Therefore, the guarantee period can be no longer than 19.33 months if the management does not want to refund the purchase price on more than 22% of the Magic Video packages.

To find the guarantee period for Magic Video Games, Inc., we need to determine the number of months in which no more than 22% of the computer systems will fail. We'll use the normal distribution properties, mean life (μ = 25 months), and standard deviation (σ = 7 months).

Step 1: Convert the percentage to a decimal value.
22% = 0.22

Step 2: Find the z-score that corresponds to the 22% failure rate.
Since we want the guarantee period to cover the time before 22% of systems fail, we will look for the z-score that corresponds to the 78% remaining functional systems (100% - 22% = 78%). We'll use a z-table or calculator to find the z-score corresponding to a 0.78 probability. In this case, the z-score is approximately 0.78.

Step 3: Use the z-score formula to find the guarantee period (x).
The z-score formula is: z = (x - μ) / σ
We'll plug in the values and solve for x: 0.78 = (x - 25) / 7

Step 4: Solve for x.
First, multiply both sides by σ: 0.78 * 7 = x - 25
Then, add μ to both sides: 5.46 + 25 = x
x ≈ 30.46

The guarantee period should be approximately 30.46 months to ensure that no more than 22% of the Magic Video packages will require a refund.

Learn more about standard deviation at: brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

The number that can divide -5  to get -2/9 is 45/2

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Dividing -5 by a number to get -2/9

Represent the number with s

So, we have

Dividing -5 by x to get -2/9

Express as an equation

So, we have

-5/x = -2/9

This gives

5/x = 2/9

Make x the subject of the formula

So, we have

2x = 45

This gives

x = 45/2

Hence, the number is x = 45/2

Read more about quotient at

https://brainly.com/question/1807180

#SPJ1

If the coefficient is negative and statistically significant, this would suggest that the punishment is having a deterrent effect on the behavior in question. since, we are only using two years of data and there could be other factors that are influencing the outcome.

To estimate the equation by fixed effects using the 1990 and 1993 data, we can follow a few steps. First, we need to create a new variable that represents the first difference between the dependent variable and each of the independent variables. This means subtracting the value of each variable in 1990 from the value of the same variable in 1993. This will give us the change in each variable over time.

Know more about the statistically significant,

https://brainly.com/question/15848236

#SPJ11

For a pack of 52 cards, two cards are drawn together, the probability that one card is clubs and one card is spades is equals to the

[tex]= \frac{13}{102}[/tex]

Probability is chances of occurrence of an event. It is calculated by dividing the favourable response to the total possible outcomes. We have a pack of 52 cards. Let's consider an event E : card is one card is culb and one is spade

Total possible outcomes = 52

Two cards are drawn together from a pack. So, number of total possible outcomes for drawing two cards from a pack, n(T) = ⁵²C₂ = 1326

In a 52 cards pack, number of spades = 13

Number of clubs cards in pack = 13

Number of ways of choosing/drawing one spades card out of 13 and one one clubs out of 13 cards, n(E) = 169

Probability that one card is clubs and one card is spades on drawing two cards,

[tex] P(E) = \frac{ n(E)}{n(T)}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{169}{1326}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{13}{102}[/tex]

Hence, required probability value is [tex]= \frac{13}{102}[/tex].

For more information about probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ4

If the probability of event E is 1, then event E will definitely occur. Therefore, the correct answer is b.

It is important to note that if the probability of an event is 1, then it is certain to occur and there is no possibility of it not occurring. This means that event E is not impossible (a), not disjoint (c), and not dependent (d) since it will occur regardless of any other events. Based on the information provided, if the probability of event E is 1, then option b. event E will definitely occur. This is because a probability of 1 indicates that the event is certain to happen.

More on probability: https://brainly.com/question/6012025

#SPJ11

To draw the influence lines for the bar forces in members ab, bk, bc, and lk, we need to first understand what influence lines are. Influence lines are graphical representations of the effect of a unit load applied at any point on the structure.

In this case, we want to draw the influence lines for the bar forces in members ab, bk, bc, and lk if the live load is applied to the truss through the lower chord. This means that we need to determine the effect of a unit load applied at different points along the lower chord on the bar forces in these members.

To draw the influence line for member ab, we need to consider a unit load applied at different points along the lower chord and determine the corresponding force in member ab. We can do this by analyzing the truss using the method of joints and solving for the force in member ab. We repeat this process for different points along the lower chord and plot the results on a graph to obtain the influence line for member ab.

Similarly, we can draw the influence lines for members bk, bc, and lk by considering unit loads applied at different points along the lower chord and determining the corresponding forces in these members.

In summary, to draw the influence lines for the bar forces in members ab, bk, bc, and lk if the live load is applied to the truss through the lower chord, we need to analyze the truss using the method of joints and consider unit loads applied at different points along the lower chord to determine the corresponding forces in these members. We can then plot the results on a graph to obtain the influence lines for each member.

learn more about Influence lines here: brainly.com/question/818949

#SPJ11

If you choose the guaranteed payoff of $200 instead of taking a chance on the lottery, you would be considered risk-averse. This means that you prefer a certain outcome (the $200) over an uncertain outcome with potentially higher gains (the lottery).

A risk-averse individual tends to prioritize avoiding losses or negative outcomes over seeking potential gains.

In this scenario, a risk-averse person may choose the guaranteed payoff because they would rather have a sure $200 than take a 50/50 chance of getting nothing at all. On the other hand, a risk-seeking person may choose the lottery because they are willing to take on the risk of winning nothing in order to potentially win $500.

Ultimately, the decision to choose the lottery or the guaranteed payoff depends on the individual's personal risk tolerance and preference for certainty.

Learn more about payoff  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29646316

#SPJ11

When cane sugar is dissolved in water, it converts to invert sugar over a period of several hours. The percentage of cane sugar that remains after 5 hours is 55.5%.

Given, f?(t) = -0.6f(t)

a) To find the percentage of cane sugar that remains after 5 hours, we need to solve the differential equation with an initial condition that f(0) = 100 (assuming all cane sugar is present at t=0).

Separating the variables, we have:

1/f(t) df/dt = -0.6

Integrating both sides with respect to t, we get:

ln|f(t)| = -0.6t + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Using the initial condition, we have:

ln|100| = -0.6(0) + C

C = ln|100|

Substituting the value of C, we get:

ln|f(t)| = -0.6t + ln|100|

Simplifying the expression, we get:

ln|f(t)/100| = -0.6t

Taking the exponential of both sides, we get:

|f(t)/100| = e^(-0.6t)

Since f(t) represents the percentage of unconverted cane sugar, we have:

[tex]f(t)/100 = e^{(-0.6t)[/tex]

Substituting t=5, we get:

f(5)/100 = [tex]e^{(-0.6*5)[/tex]

f(5) = 55.5

Therefore, the percentage of cane sugar that remains after 5 hours is 55.5%.

b) To find the percentage of cane sugar that remains after 10 hours, we can use the same differential equation and solve with the initial condition that f(0) = 100.

Following the same steps as above, we get:

Following the same steps as above, we get:

f(10) = 23.1

Therefore, the percentage of cane sugar that remains after 10 hours is 23.1%.

For more details regarding percentage, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ1

By mathematical induction, the algorithm correctly sorts the entire array. The algorithm needs to run for only the first n − 1 elements, rather than for all n elements because the last element of the array will already be sorted by the time the algorithm reaches the (n-1)th element.

This is because the algorithm compares adjacent elements and swaps them if they are in the wrong order, meaning that the largest element will "bubble" up to the end of the array with each pass.

The loop invariant that this algorithm maintains is that after each iteration of the outer loop, the (n-i+1)th to nth elements of the array will be in their final sorted positions. In other words, the largest i elements in the array will be sorted and in their final positions.

To prove the correctness of the algorithm, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case: When i = 1, the algorithm sorts the largest element to its final position at the end of the array. This is trivially correct.

Inductive step: Assume that the algorithm correctly sorts the largest i elements of the array for some i < n. Then, after the (i+1)th iteration of the outer loop, the largest (i+1) elements of the array will be sorted and in their final positions. This is because the inner loop will compare and swap adjacent elements until the (n-i+1)th to (n-1)th elements are sorted, and the (n-i)th element will be compared with the (n-i+1)th element and swapped if necessary. Thus, the algorithm maintains the loop invariant after each iteration of the outer loop.

Know more about mathematical induction here:

https://brainly.com/question/29503103

#SPJ11

Looking up the z-score of -1.2 in the table, we find that the probability P(x < 81) ≈ 0.1151 (rounded to four decimal places).
So, P(x < 81) = 0.1151.

Given that the random variable x is normally distributed with a mean (µ) of 87 and a standard deviation (σ) of 5, we are asked to find the probability P(x < 81).

To solve this problem, we need to use the standard normal distribution table or a calculator that has the capability to calculate probabilities for a normal distribution.

First, we need to standardize the random variable x by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation. This process will give us the z-score for x.

z = (x - u) / o

In this case, we have:

z = (81 - 87) / 5 = -1.2

Now, we can use the standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.2.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find that the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.2 is 0.1151 (rounded to four decimal places).

Therefore, the probability of getting a value of x less than 81 is approximately 0.1151.

P(x<81) = 0.1151 (rounded to four decimal places).

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

The correct answer is e. Linear programming models have three important properties: proportionality, additivity, and linearity.

These properties allow for the creation of efficient optimization models that can be used to solve complex problems in various industries. Proportionality refers to the relationship between the input variables and the output, while additivity refers to the ability to combine multiple variables into a single equation. Linearity refers to the fact that the output is directly proportional to the input, making it easier to analyze and optimize the model.

Learn more about linearity here

https://brainly.com/question/29854127

#SPJ11

=13.62

- We are given the interarrival time (a = 15 min), service time (p = 20 min), number of servers (m = 3 people), standard deviation of interarrival time (15 min) and standard deviation of service time (60 min). - Therefore, the coefficient of variation of arrival times is 15 / 15 = 1 and the coefficient of variation of service times is 60 / 20 = 3. Moreover, the utilization is 20 / (15 x 3) = 0.4444. Therefore, the average time in the queue is 6.6667 x 0.4086 x 5.0 = 13.6211 minutes, or 13.62 minutes rounded to two decimals

- We are given the interarrival time (a = 15 min), service time (p = 20 min), number of servers (m = 3 people), standard deviation of interarrival time (15 min) and standard deviation of service time (60 min). - Therefore, the coefficient of variation of arrival times is 15 / 15 = 1 and the coefficient of variation of service times is 60 / 20 = 3. Moreover, the utilization is 20 / (15 x 3) = 0.4444. Therefore, the average time in the queue is 6.6667 x 0.4086 x 5.0 = 13.6211 minutes, or 13.62 minutes rounded to two decim

The statement "The General Law of Multiplication is used to calculate the probability of the union of two events" is false.

The General Law of Multiplication is used to calculate the probability of the intersection of two events, not the union. The intersection of two events refers to the probability that both events occur simultaneously.

To find the probability of the intersection of two events A and B, we use the General Law of Multiplication as follows:

P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B|A)

Here, P(A ∩ B) represents the probability of the intersection of events A and B, P(A) is the probability of event A occurring, and P(B|A) is the conditional probability of event B occurring given that event A has occurred.

On the other hand, the probability of the union of two events, which refers to the probability that either one or both of the events occur, is calculated using the General Law of Addition. The formula for the union of two events A and B is:

P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B)

In this formula, P(A ∪ B) represents the probability of the union of events A and B, P(A) is the probability of event A occurring, P(B) is the probability of event B occurring, and P(A ∩ B) is the probability of the intersection of events A and B.

To know more about Law of Multiplication click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15267352#

#SPJ11

While collecting data about the characteristics of households, the  approach may suffer from:

ecological fallacy, generalization issues, lack of individual-level detail, within-household variability, reverse causality, self-reporting bias

This approach may suffer from several limitations:

Drawing conclusions about individuals based on aggregated household-level data can lead to an ecological fallacy.

It assumes that individual characteristics align with the characteristics of the entire household, which may not be accurate for all individuals within the household.

Findings derived from household-level data may have limited generalizability to the larger population.

Household characteristics may not be representative of individuals outside the sampled households, resulting in potential biases and limited applicability of the conclusions.

Analyzing household-level data may overlook important individual-level details.

Factors influencing individual behaviors, preferences, and decision-making processes may not be fully captured or accurately attributed when only considering household-level characteristics.

Households often consist of individuals with diverse characteristics and behaviors.

Treating all individuals within a household as homogeneous can mask variations and nuances that exist within the household, leading to potential inaccuracies in the conclusions drawn.

Inferring causal relationships between household characteristics and individual outcomes is challenging.

Without proper experimental design and control over confounding variables, making it difficult to establish a causal link.

The reliance on self-reported data in household surveys may introduce biases and inaccuracies.

Individuals may provide socially desirable responses or misrepresent their characteristics, which can affect the validity of the conclusions drawn.

It is important to consider these limitations when interpreting findings based on household-level data and to supplement the analysis with individual-level data whenever possible.

Learn more about ecological fallacy

brainly.com/question/29841228

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the sheet metal are 10 inches by 2.86 inches.

To find the dimensions of the sheet metal, we need to use the formulas for the area and volume of a cylinder.

The formula for the volume of a cylinder is:
[tex]V = πr^2h[/tex]
where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height.

Since we want the volume of the stovepipe to be 900 in^3, we can plug in the values and solve for the height:
[tex]900 = πr^2h[/tex]
[tex]h=\frac{900}{πr^{2} }[/tex]

Now, the formula for the lateral surface area of a cylinder is:
A = 2πrh
where A is the lateral surface area.

We know that the sheet metal has an area of 1800 in^2, so we can set up an equation:
1800 = 2πrh

Substituting h from the first equation, we get:
[tex]1800=2πr(\frac{900}{πr^{2} } )[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:
r = 10
So the radius of the cylinder is 10 inches.

Substituting this value of r into the equation for h, we get:
[tex]h=\frac{900}{π(10^{2}) }[/tex]
h =2.86

So the height of the cylinder is approximately 2.86 inches.

Therefore, the dimensions of the sheet metal are 10 inches by 2.86 inches.

To know more about "Cylinder" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/16134180#

#SPJ11

The probability of a group of 12 US adults riding the ski gondola having a mean weight greater than 167 lbs, so that their total weight would have been greater than the gondola maximum capacity of 2,004 lbs, is approximately 0.0002 or 0.02%.

To find the probability of a group of 12 US adults riding the ski gondola having a mean weight greater than 167 lbs, we need to use the central limit theorem.
Assuming that the weights of the adults are normally distributed with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of σ, the mean weight of the sample of 12 adults can be approximated by a normal distribution with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of σ/√12.
We know that the maximum capacity of the gondola is 2,004 lbs. Let's assume that the average weight of each adult is 150 lbs, which means that the total weight of the group would be 12 x 150 = 1,800 lbs.
To exceed the maximum capacity, the mean weight of the group would need to be greater than 2,004/12 = 167 lbs.
Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability of a sample mean greater than 167 lbs with a standard deviation of σ/√12.
P(sample mean > 167) = P(Z > (167-150)/(σ/√12))
Let's assume a standard deviation of σ = 20 lbs.
P(sample mean > 167) = P(Z > (17)/(20/√12))
P(sample mean > 167) = P(Z > 3.6)
Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find that the probability of a Z-score greater than 3.6 is approximately 0.0002.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11