Answer:
Explanation:
the author name is Vera Tripodi (u got an extra l in there) n paper is "The Value of Diversity and Inclusiveness in Philosophy. An Overview." the main theme is that individuals are marginalized in study of philosophy due to the big gender gap.
philosophy is highly subjective n its study is heavily influenced by its scholars. its well known among academia that there is a gender gap - most professors and researchers are men with very few women. while that may not be significant in experiment-based subjects like science and engineering, that is not the case for many humanity studies. philosophy is particularly personal and the perspective of a male scholar can be very different from that of a female colleague. this leads to the conclusions drawn from such studies may be biased or even discriminated female population.
Answer:
Explanation:
The argument was that study of philosophy was biased and treated women different from men. The author cited one of the earliest philosopher: Aristotle. His "notions of “form” and “matter” reflect sexual differences: the former is intrinsically linked to “being male” and latter to “being feminine”. This gender association poses a problem for feminists: Aristotelian matter and form are not treated as equal and the form has priority over the matter." Her conclusion is that "the sexism of the distinction between form and matter is inherent to Aristotle’s metaphysic."
Cultures that often create systems of formal rules as a way to provide more security
and reduce risk are called high-uncertainty-avoidance cultures.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Uncertainty avoidance refers to the difference in cultures based on the tolerance level that they have when it comes to unpredictability.
People in cultures that has high uncertainty avoidance minimize unforeseen or unknown circumstances and have rules in place which will help in mitigating the risks. On the other hand, low uncertainty avoidance cultures are quick to accept changes and have few rules.
Therefore, the statement that "Cultures that often create systems of formal rules as a way to provide more security
and reduce risk are called high-uncertainty-avoidance cultures" is true.
Explain the difference between pastime focus and present time focus
Answer:
The difference between past time focus and present time focus is that present time refers to the moment we are living in, the moment we are going through now. The past time focus is that we are paying attention to the things that we have experienced in the past.
There are difference between pastime focus and present time focus.
The difference between past time focus and present time focus is that
The present time refers to the moment we are living in, the moment we are going through now. The past time focus is that we are paying attention to the things that we have experienced in the past.Learn more about past time here:
https://brainly.com/question/14671370
#SPJ2
Ito ay pag-alis ng kontrol ng pamahalaansa iba’t-ibang aspekto ng industriya at agrikultura upang mahikayat angmga dayuhang negosyante sa bansa. *,
Answer:
Sorry I don't understand your language
Having a strong perceptual set may result in which of the following?
A. Accurate interpretation of sensory information
B. Biased perception based on assumptions
C. A reliance on bottom-up processing
D. Careful attention to all sensory stimuli
E. Formations of perceptions that conflict with the perceptual set
The situation of having a strong perceptual set may result in the formation of Perceptions that conflict with the perceptual set.
What is a strong perceptual set?This refers to a situation of having a predisposition to perceive things in a certain way which lead to notice of certain aspects of an object or situation while ignoring other details.
Hence, the situation of having a strong perceptual set may result in the formation of Perceptions that conflict with the perceptual set.
Therefore, the Option E is correct.
Read more about perceptual set
brainly.com/question/11924416
#SPJ9
Explain why pure democracies are more vulnerable to factions than republics
Answer:
With pure democracy, he means a system in which every citizen votes directly for laws (direct democracy), and, with republic, he intends a society in which citizens elect a small body of representatives who then vote for laws (representative democracy).
Explanation:
Explain why pure democracies are more vulnerable to factions than republics Pure democracy has no treatment for the mischiefs of faction due to the fact the larger faction has manipulated and could continually placed down the weaker ones.
What is direct or natural democracy?The direct democracy, additionally known as natural democracy, kinds of direct participation of residents in democratic choice-making, in comparison to oblique or consultant democracy.
In a republic, a charter or constitution of rights protects positive inalienable rights that can not be taken away through the government, even though it's been elected by a majority of voters. In a "natural democracy," the bulk isn't always constrained in this manner and may impose its will at the minority.
Read more about the democracies :
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ2
Mga taong nananakot o nanggulo sa pamahalaan at bansa
Answer:
mga masasamang tao o Walang magawa sa buhay
Khái niệm Kinh tế công nghiệp
Answer:
Kinh tế công nghiệp là môn nghiên cứu về các doanh nghiệp, ngành và thị trường. Nó nhìn vào các công ty thuộc mọi quy mô - từ các cửa hàng góc địa phương đến những người khổng lồ đa quốc gia như WalMart hay Tesco. Và nó xem xét một loạt các ngành công nghiệp, chẳng hạn như sản xuất điện, sản xuất xe hơi và nhà hàng.