Question 1 of 10
The triangles shown below may not be congruent.
66V
100
100
00
2017
A. True
B. False
SUBMIT

Answer:

The answer is "47.5354".

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given graph it is a half-circle and a triangle.

So, the diameter of the circle is 6.2 so the radius is 3.1

[tex]\text{Area of a circle}= \pi r^2\\\\\text{Area of a triangle}= \frac{1}{2} b h\\\\[/tex]

Calculating the total area of the shape:

[tex]= \pi r^2+\frac{1}{2} \times b\times h\\\\ = 3.14 \times 3.1^2+\frac{1}{2} \times 6.2 \times 5.6\\\\ = 3.14 \times 3.1^2+\frac{1}{2} \times 6.2 \times 5.6\\\\=3.14 \times 9.61+\frac{1}{2} \times 34.72\\\\=3.14 \times 9.61+\frac{1}{2} \times 34.72\\\\= 30.1754+17.36\\\\=47.5354\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

503.75, 504.75, 505.75, 506.75

Step-by-step explanation:

x+(x+1)+(x+2)+(x+3)=2021

4x+6=2021

4x=2015

x=503.75

so it would be

503.75+504.75+505.75+506.75= 2021

Answer:

The two equivalent expressions are 6(x − y) and 6x − 6y.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

At the null hypothesis, we test if there was no increase, that is, the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was an increase, that is, the mean is greater than 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 0[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, s is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]

104 companies, adjusted for inflation, in a recent year. The mean increase in real compensation was x¯=6.9%, and the standard deviation of the increases was s=55%.

This means that [tex]n = 104, X = 6.9, s = 55[/tex]

Value of the test-statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{6.9 - 0}{\frac{55}{\sqrt{104}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 1.28[/tex]

P-value of the test:

The p-value of the test is a right-tailed test(test if the mean is greater than a value), with 104 - 1 = 103 df and t = 1.28.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.1017.

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Answer:

f(x+1) = -3/4 × f(x)

Step-by-step explanation:

first of all, the sign of the numbers in the sequence is alternating. so, there must be a "-" involved.

that eliminates the first and third answer options.

and the absolute values of the numbers in the sequence are going down. |f(x+1)| < |f(x)|

that eliminates the fourth answer option, as this says that

|f(x)| < |f(x+1)|. and that is the opposite of how the actual sequence behaves.

Step-by-step explanation:

90*8.25=742 rounds to 675 because its the closest. 85-95=10 divided by 2=5+85=90. 9-7.5=1.5 divided by 2=0.75+7.5=8.25. thats how i got those numbers. THE ANSWER IS C

Answer:

221

Step-by-step explanation:

Given sequence is ,

> 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9.

The common difference is 6-5 = 1 .

Therefore , the 221st number will be

> 221 st term = 221 × 1 = 221 .

Hence the 221 st term is 221 .

Answer:

225

Step-by-step explanation:

d = 6 - 5 = 1 (common differences)

a = 5 (first term)

221st term

a+(n-1)d

5 +(221 - 1) 1

5 + 220 =225

Therefore the answer is 225

Answer: The answer is 295,222.

Step-by-step explanation: The area of a rectangle is base times height, which is 914 x 323. If you do the math correctly, you will get 295,222.

[tex] \huge\boxed{\mathfrak{Answer}}[/tex]

Length (l) = 914 units

Breadth (b) = 323 units

Area = ?

Area of a rectangle (a) = l × b ----> use this formula

[tex]a = l \times b \\ a = 914 \times 323 \\ a = 295222 \: \: sq.units[/tex]

=> The area of the rectangle is 295222 sq.units.

Answer:

∠AED

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical angles are the opposite angles of intersecting lines. ∠BEC and ∠AED are opposite and would therefore also be congruent angles.

Answer:

[tex]\angle BEC=\angle AED [vertical ~angle][/tex]

[tex]\angle AED~vertical~ angle ~to~ \angle BEC[/tex]

[tex]ANSWER:\angle AED[/tex]

-----------------------------

hope it helps...

have a great day!!

Answer:

Jose has 5.2 meters of fabric left.

Step-by-step explanation:

5.6 - 0.4 = 5.2

Answer:

2.25 or 2 hours 15 mins

Step-by-step explanation:

90/40 = 2.25

Answer:

16 √(3)

and then the decimal form if needed is: 27.7128129211

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I don't think it's possible.

Answer:

Hence the correct option is option b) Yes, the upper level of one standard deviation is 72.

A score of 74 is not within one standard deviation of the mean.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the given details are,

Mean = 68  

SD = 4  

Distribution is normal.  

Z-score for x = 74 is given as below:  

[tex]Z = (X - mean)/SD\\Z = (74 - 68)/4\\Z = 1.5[/tex]  

So, the score of 74 is 1.5 standard deviations from the mean.  

[tex]Mean + 1\timesSD = 68 + 1\times4 = 72Mean - 1\timesSD = 68 - 1\times4 = 64[/tex]  

Therefore the score is not lies between 64 and 72.  

Yes, the upper level of one standard deviation is 72.  

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  133 1/3 km/hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Average speed is computed as ...

  average speed = (total distance)/(total time)

  = (80 km +120 km +200 km)/(2/3 + 1 + 1 1/3 hour) = 400 km/(3 hour)

  = 133 1/3 km/hour

Answer:

1) g is the dependent variable.(A)

2) u is the independent variable.(D)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

✔️-72 ÷ (-2)

The division of two negative numbers will give us a positive number. i.e. - ÷ - = +

Therefore:

-72 ÷ (-2) = 36

✔️-72 ÷ 2

The division of a negative number and a positive number will give us a negative number. i.e. - ÷ + = -

Therefore:

-72 ÷ 2 = -36

✔️72 ÷ (-2)

The division of a positive number and a negative number will give us a negative number. i.e. + ÷ - = -

Therefore:

72 ÷ (-2) = -36

Answer:

y=1/2x+1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the slope, you can use rise/run, in this case, the slope is 1/2 and the y-intercept is at (0, 0.5)

Answer:

(0.38, 4.79)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. x = 3, y = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

If both triangles are congruent by the HL Theorem, then their hypotenuse and a corresponding leg would be equal to each other.

Thus:

x + 3 = 3y (eqn. 1) => equal hypotenuse

Also,

x = y + 1 (eqn. 2) => equal legs

✔️Substitute x = y + 1 into eqn. 1 to find y.

x + 3 = 3y (eqn. 1)

(y + 1) + 3 = 3y

y + 1 + 3 = 3y

y + 4 = 3y

y + 4 - y = 3y - y

4 = 2y

Divide both sides by 2

4/2 = 2y/2

2 = y

y = 2

✔️ Substitute y = 2 into eqn. 2 to find x.

x = y + 1 (eqn. 2)

x = 2 + 1

x = 3

Answer:

x = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm assuming the equation looks like this:

[tex]\frac{2}{3}x-\frac{1}{9}x+5=20[/tex]

Here's how to solve for x:

[tex]\frac{2}{3}x-\frac{1}{9}x+5=20[/tex]

(subtract 5 from both sides)

[tex]\frac{2}{3}x-\frac{1}{9}x=15[/tex]

(Find the GCF of 3 and 9, which is 3. Multiply 2/3 by 3/3. You get 6/9)

[tex]\frac{6}{9}x-\frac{1}{9}x=15[/tex]

(add like terms)

[tex]\frac{5}{9}x=15[/tex]

(multiply 9/5 to both sides, which is the same as dividing both sides by 5/9)

x = 27

Hope it helps (●'◡'●)

Answer:

C.[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=0.1334[/tex]

D.[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)\approx 0.2942[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

n=18

Mean, [tex]\mu=6.75[/tex]

Standard deviation, [tex]\sigma=2.28[/tex]

c.

[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=P(\frac{7.0039-6.75}{2.28}<\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{7.8026-6.75}{2.28})[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=P(0.11<Z<0.46)[/tex]

[tex]P(a<z<b)=P(z<b)-P(z<a)[/tex]

Using the formula

[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=P(Z<0.46)-P(Z<0.11)[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=0.67724-0.54380[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<x<7.8026)=0.1334[/tex]

D.[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)=P(\frac{7.0039-6.75}{2.28/\sqrt{18}}<\frac{x-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}})<\frac{7.8026-6.75}{2.28/\sqrt{18}})[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)=P(0.47<Z<1.96)[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)=P(Z<1.96)-P(Z<0.47)[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)=0.97500-0.68082[/tex]

[tex]P(7.0039<\bar{x}<7.8026)=0.29418\approx 0.2942[/tex]

Hi there!

[tex]\large\boxed{(x + 2)}[/tex]

x² + 3x + 2

We know that x + 1 is a factor, so:

We must find another number that adds up to 3 when added to 1 and multiplies into 2 with 1. We get:

x + 2

(x + 1)(x + 2)

Answer:

a=2, b=3,x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

We have to find the value of the missing letters in the sum of numbers.

From given sum

1+a+b=x   ....(1)

b+b+b=9  .....(2)

a+a=4       ......(3)

From equation (2) we get

[tex]3b=9[/tex]

[tex]\implies b=3[/tex]

From equation (3) we get

[tex]2a=4[/tex]

[tex]a=4/2[/tex]

[tex]a=2[/tex]

Now, substitute the values in equation (1) we get

[tex]1+2+3=x[/tex]

[tex]x=6[/tex]

Therefore,

231+32+233=496

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-2

Answer:

[tex]224cm^3\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]4cm*7cm*8cm=[/tex]

[tex]=224cm^3[/tex]

Hope this is helpful.

LWH=A

Plug in the numbers:

4*7*8=224^2

The area would be 224cm^2.

Answer:

x=22.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the proportion:

5/x=2/9

Cross multiply. Multiply the numerator (top number) of the first fraction by the denominator (bottom number) of the second. Then multiply the denominator of the first by the numerator of the second.

5*9=2*x

45=2x

2 and x are being multiplied. The opposite of multiplication is division. Divide both sides by 2. This will cancel out the 2 being multiplied by x, and leave x by itself.

45/2=2x/2

45/2=x

22.5=x

If we substitute 22.5 in for x, the final proportion will be:

5/22.5=2/9

Answer:

(a) [tex]P(Two\ Positive) = 0.2775[/tex]

(b) It is not too low

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]P(Single\ Positive) = 0.15[/tex]

[tex]n = 2[/tex]

Solving (a):

[tex]P(Two\ Positive)[/tex]

First, calculate the probability of single negative

[tex]P(Single\ Negative) =1 - P(Single\ Positive)[/tex] --- complement rule

[tex]P(Single\ Negative) =1 - 0.15[/tex]

[tex]P(Single\ Negative) =0.85[/tex]

The probability that two combined tests are negative is:

[tex]P(Two\ Negative) = P(Single\ Negative) *P(Single\ Negative)[/tex]

[tex]P(Two\ Negative) = 0.85 * 0.85[/tex]

[tex]P(Two\ Negative) = 0.7225[/tex]

Using the complement rule, we have:

[tex]P(Two\ Positive) = 1 - P(Two\ Negative)[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]P(Two\ Positive) = 1 - 0.7225[/tex]

[tex]P(Two\ Positive) = 0.2775[/tex]

Solving (b): Is (a) low enough?

Generally, when a probability is less than or  equal to 0.05; such probabilities are extremely not likely to occur

By comparison:

[tex]0.2775 > 0.05[/tex]

Hence, it is not too low