Quadrilateral ABCD is transformed according to the rule (x, y) → (y, –x). Which is another way to state the transformation?
R0, 90°
R0, 180°
R0, 270°
R0, 360°

Answer:

for the first question

solve for t:t= square root of 2da/a (2da over a)

Solve for a : a= 2d/t squared

Solver for d: d=t squared /2(over 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$22

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi here is the explanation

We just do the opposite of the question

We just add the values

So 3+8=11

Now multiply. Since when we have the total and we spent haslf of it, we divide, so now we multiply by reciprocal, the opposite

11*2=22 (2 is the reciprocal)

Now let’s see we did it right

22*1/2=11

Now let’s subtract to find the remaining

11-3=8

As you can see, we are right as they had $8 left.

Hope it helps

Hope you mark me brainliest!

Answer: Hansel is 32

Step-by-step explanation: 11x3-1=32, 32+11=43

Answer:

3.99

Step-by-step explanation:

2.19x2=3.99

20.34-4.39=15.96

15.96 divided by 4 =3.99

Answer:

x

__

140

Step-by-step explanation:

all i could get sorry

Answer:

Wow that is great

Step-by-step explanation:

is there a question? uhhhmmmmm

Answer:

A' (4,4), B' (5,7), C' (9,7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y-intercpet is In analytic geometry, using the common convention that the horizontal axis represents a variable x and the vertical axis represents a variable y, a y-intercept or vertical intercept is a point where the graph of a function or relation intersects the y-axis of the coordinate system. As such, these points satisfy x = 0.

[tex] \red { \orange {\boxed {\boxed{Answers}}}}[/tex]

[tex] = (x + 5)(x + 4)[/tex]

[tex] = {x}^{2} + 4x + 5x + 20[/tex]

[tex] = {x}^{2} + 9x + 20[/tex]

[tex]\large\underline{\bf \red{Step \:by\: Step \:Explanation:}}[/tex]

Let us take ,

Also let us consider x > y .

According to first Condition :-

⇒ x - y = 1.

⇒ x = y + 1. .............(i)

According to second Condition :-

⇒ x × y = 30 .

⇒ ( y + 1 )y = 30 . [ From (i) ]

⇒ y² + y = 30.

⇒ y² + y - 30 = 0 .

⇒ y² + 6y - 5y -30 = 0.

⇒ y ( y + 6 ) -5 ( y + 6 ) = 0 .

⇒ ( y + 6 ) ( y - 5 ) = 0 .

[tex]\red{\bf \longmapsto y = 5 , (-6)}[/tex]

Here y can sustain both values 5 and minus 6 as y is an integer.

So , x = -6 , 5 .

Hence possible answers are ,

[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf x = -6 , y = -5 }}[/tex]

[tex]\qquad\qquad\qquad \bf Or [/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf x = 6 , y = 5 }}[/tex]

.

6y^2 + 6y + 2y + 2 = 6y^2 + 8y + 2

The way you do this is basically multiplying the values in the brackets with 6y, and then adding that to the same values multiplied by 2.

Answer:

t ≤ 4

Step-by-step explanation:

3 X 4 = 12  or any number greater than 4

Answer:

21 squares

Step-by-step explanation:

1 = 1

2 = 3

3 = 6

The pattern follows squares use in the previous stage + new stage = squares use the new stage

Squares used in stage 2 = Squares used in stage 1 + stage 2

= 1 + 2

= 3 squares

Squares used in stage 3 = Squares used in stage 2 + stage 3

= 3 + 3

= 6 squares

Squares used in stage 4 = Squares used in stage 3 + stage 4

= 6 + 4

= 10 squares

Squares used in stage 5 = Squares used in stage 4 + stage 5

= 10 + 5

= 15 squares

Squares used in stage 6 = Squares used in stage 5 + stage 6

= 15 + 6

= 21 squares

4 = 10

5 = 15

6 = 21

Answer:

78.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the volume is 27 and to get a volume of a cube it will be side cubed meaningit will be side x side x side so to get the length of one side we will look for the cube root of 27 by using factor tree and the cube root will be 3

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 3/5 inches in a year

Step-by-step explanation:

28 1/5 - 25 3/5 = 141/5 - 128/5 = 13/5 = 10/5 + 3/5 = 2 + 3/5 = 2 3/5

Answer: B. Joel

hope this helps :}

Answer:

-4.9

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is -4.9 because:

1) As the number line increases, the numbers are also increasing even though  it seems like they are decreasing.

2) The number that comes right after -5 is -4.9

Hope this helps! :D

Answer:

The answer is D

Step-by-step explanation:

you might get confused with A but its D because D is separating 4 + 3 from 3 wich we are multiplying  and A is not. so the answer is D

Answer:

here we go.....

Step-by-step explanation:

9+5 equals14 5 +2 equals 7

14 divided by 7 equals 2

hope you get it correct

Answer:

Option (B)

Step-by-step explanation:

Photo given in the picture has dimensions as,

Length = 4 in.

Width = 5 in.

This photo is the reduced form of a photo having dimension 16 by 20 inch print.

Since scale factor of an image is given by,

Scale factor = [tex]\frac{\text{Dimension of the image}}{\text{Dimension of the original picture}}[/tex]

                    = [tex]\frac{4}{16}[/tex]

                    = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Therefore, scale factor used to reduce the picture is [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex].

Option (B). will be the correct option.

Answer:

it's 4

Step-by-step explanation:

it's 1:4 cause 16/4 is 4 so the scale factor is 4

Answer:

I believe [tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x)[/tex] also equals 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that g(x) has to be greater than or equal to 0. That means f(x) has to be smaller than g(x) or equal to 0.

If we plug in any value of x, f(x) will be positive because of the absolute value. The only way we are going to get f(x) smaller than g(x) or equal to g(x) is to have very small fractions.

Therefore, if [tex]\lim_{x \to a} g(x)=0[/tex], then [tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x)=0[/tex] because f(x) must be smaller or equal to 0 as well.

Answer:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x\to a}f(x)=0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The other user posted a great answer, but I would like to show you a more mathematical way!

We have [tex]|f(x)|\leq g(x)[/tex].

By the definition of absolute value, this is the same as saying:

[tex]f(x)\leq g(x)\text{ and } -f(x)\leq g(x)[/tex]

For the right, we can divide both sides by -1 to acquire:

[tex]f(x)\leq g(x)\text{ and } f(x)\geq- g(x)[/tex]

We can now combine them. This yields:

[tex]-g(x)\leq f(x)\leq g(x)[/tex]

Now, we can use the Squeeze Theorem (a.k.a. Pinch or Sandwich Theorem). The Squeeze Theorem posits that if we have:

[tex]g(x)\leq f(x)\leq h(x)[/tex]

And:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x \to c} g(x)= \lim_{x \to c} h(x)=L}[/tex]

Then the following must be true:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x \to c} f(x)=L[/tex]

We have:

[tex]-g(x)\leq f(x)\leq g(x)[/tex]

And we know that:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x \to a} g(x)=0[/tex]

Then it follows that:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x \to a} -g(x)=- \lim_{x \to a} g(x)=0[/tex]

Therefore, by using the Squeeze Theorem, we can conclude that:

[tex]\displaystyle{ \lim_{x\to a}f(x)=0[/tex]

And we're done!

Answer:

2,494

Step-by-step explanation:

if he put 2,494pieces together you repeated the same question

Answer:

44 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

just do 22 x 2