Plsss help quickly
Plssssssssssssssss

Answer: ) 0.45 is the answer

Answer:

Yes I do because I'm good.Yes I do because I'm good.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 0

Step-by-step explanation:

So basically, [tex]k^{2}[/tex] = 9/4. So [tex]k[/tex] = 3/2. But you can also have negative scale factors, so it would be -3/2.

3/2 + (-3/2) = 0.

Hope this helps.

The circle of radius $\sqrt{3}/3$ circumscribes the square of side length 1. Therefore, the area outside the square but inside the circle is the difference between the area of the circle and the area of the square. The area of the circle is $\pi(\sqrt{3}/3)^2 = \pi/3$, and the area of the square is $1^2 = 1$. Thus, the area inside the circle but outside the square is $\pi/3 - 1 \approx -0.28$.

We know that the square and circle share the same center. Therefore, the circle circumscribes the square. The area inside the circle but outside the square is the difference between the area of the circle and the area of the square. We can calculate the area of the circle using the formula $A=\pi r^2$, where $r$ is the radius of the circle. The radius of the circle is $\sqrt{3}/3$, so the area of the circle is $\pi(\sqrt{3}/3)^2 = \pi/3$. The area of the square is simply the side length squared, which is $1^2=1$. Therefore, the area inside the circle but outside the square is $\pi/3 - 1 \approx -0.28$.

The area inside the circle but outside the square is approximately -0.28.

To know more about area visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ11

Therefore, the area inside the circle outside the square is (π/3) - 1 square unit.

To find the area inside the circle but outside the square, we first need to determine the square's area and the circle's area.
1. Find the area of the square:
Side length = 1
Area of square = side × side = 1 × 1 = 1 square unit
2. Find the area of the circle:
Radius = √3/3
Area of circle = π × radius² = π × (√3/3)² = π × (3/9) = π/3 square units
3. Subtract the area of the square from the area of the circle:
Area inside the circle but outside square = Area of the circle - Area of square = (π/3) - 1 square units

Therefore, the area inside the circle outside the square is (π/3) - 1 square unit.

To know more about circle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24375372

#SPJ11

The proportion of women working for pay increased significantly, the earnings of most income groups, except for the top 10 percent, remained stagnant or declined.

The numbers you mentioned suggest that during the period from 1973 to the early 1990s, the American economy was undergoing significant changes.

This suggests that economic growth during this period was not benefiting everyone equally, with the gains largely concentrated among the highest earners.

Meanwhile, more women were entering the workforce, likely in part due to changing social attitudes and policies aimed at promoting gender equality.

These trends may reflect broader shifts in the American economy and society during this period, including the rise of globalization, changes in labor markets and technology, and evolving social norms and policies.

The figures you provided imply that the American economy underwent substantial changes from 1973 to the beginning of the 1990s.

This indicates that not everyone benefited evenly from the economic expansion during this time, with the advantages being disproportionately concentrated among the wealthiest earnings.

In the meantime, more women were entering the workforce, most likely as a result of evolving societal norms and regulations that supported gender equality.

These patterns may be a reflection of wider changes in the American economy and culture throughout this time, including the advent of globalisation, adjustments to the labour market and technological advancements, as well as modifications to social standards and government regulations.

For similar questions on proportion

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

The expected value of this game is 0.5k - 0.5k, which simplifies to 0. This means that on average, you neither win nor lose money in the long run if you keep playing this game. However, it's important to note that in any individual round of the game, you could either win k dollars or lose k dollars. The expected value of this game is (1/2)k dollars.

To calculate the expected value of this game, we need to consider the probabilities and outcomes for each possible result of the coin flip:

1. If the coin comes up heads (probability = 1/2), you win k dollars in addition to getting your k dollars back. The total outcome for heads is 2k dollars.

2. If the coin comes up tails (probability = 1/2), you lose your k dollars. The total outcome for tails is -k dollars.

Now, we can calculate the expected value using the formula:

Expected Value = (Probability of heads * Outcome for heads) + (Probability of tails * Outcome for tails)

Expected Value = (1/2 * 2k) + (1/2 * -k)

Expected Value = k - (1/2)k

Expected Value = (1/2)k

The expected value of this game is (1/2)k dollars.

Learn more about probabilities at: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The similarity ratio of the first triangle to the second triangle would be = 1:2.

The ratio can be defined as the representation of two values in a way that one variable shows the quantity that is found in the other variable.

From the two triangles given above, ∆IJK ≈ ∆ECD

That is length JK ≈ length CD

The ratio that exist between them is as follows:

JK/CD = 10/20 = 1/2 = 1:2

Learn more about ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/29145263

#SPJ1

The expected number of times we see three consecutive tails in 12 coin flips is 5/4.

Let X be the random variable representing the number of times we see three consecutive tails in 12 coin flips.

We can break down X into 10 smaller random variables, where X(i) represents the number of times we see three consecutive tails starting at the ith flip.

Specifically, X(i) = 1 if the ith, (i+1)th, and (i+2)th flips are all tails, and 0 otherwise.

Then we have:

X = X(1) + X(2) + ... + X(10).

Using the linearity of expectation, we can find the expected value of X by summing the expected values of X(1), X(2), ..., X(10)

E[X] = E[X(1)] + E[X(2)] + ... + E[X(10)]

To find E[X(i)], we can use the fact that the probability of getting three consecutive tails in a row is [tex]1/2^3 = 1/8,[/tex] and the probability of not getting three consecutive tails in a row is 1 - 1/8 = 7/8.

Thus, the probability distribution of X(i) is a Bernoulli distribution with parameter p = 1/8.

Therefore, we have:

E[X(i)] = 1 * P(X(i) = 1) + 0 * P(X(i) = 0)

= 1 * (1/8) + 0 * (7/8)

= 1/8.

Substituting this into our earlier formula, we get:

E[X] = E[X(1)] + E[X(2)] + ... + E[X(10)]

= 10 * (1/8)

= 5/4.

For question on similar random variable.

https://brainly.com/question/28021905

#SPJ11

Answer:

1) 180 - (75 + 72) = 33

2) 180 - ((180 - 125) + 65) = 60

3) 180 - (180 - ((180 - 125) + 90)) = 145

4) 180 - (180 - (62 + 62)) = 124

Answer:

2. 0.5. 50%

3. 0.45 45%

4. 0.5 50%

5. 0.25 25%

The volume of the block is increasing at a rate of [tex]6 ft^3/hour[/tex] at this time.

Space in three dimensions is quantified by volume. It is frequently expressed as a numerical value using SI-derived units, other imperial units, or US customary units. Volume definition and length definition are connected.  

The area occupied inside an object's three-dimensional bounds is referred to as its volume. The item's capacity is another name for it. A three-dimensional object's volume, which is expressed in cubic metres, is the quantity of space it takes up.

Let's start by finding the formula for the volume of a cube with side length s:

V = [tex]s^3[/tex]

Now, let's differentiate both sides with respect to time (t):

dV/dt = [tex]3s^2(ds/dt)[/tex]

We know that ds/dt = 2 ft/hour, and when s = 1 ft, we have:

dV/dt = [tex]3(1^2)(2) = 6 ft^3/hour[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the block is increasing at a rate of [tex]6 ft^3/hour[/tex] at this time.

Learn more about volume Visit: brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ4

To maximize the volume of an open-top container made from a 13-inch by 48-inch piece of plastic, you need to determine the optimal size of the squares to be cut out from each corner. Let 'x' be the side length of the square removed from each corner. After cutting, the dimensions of the container will be:

- Length: 48 - 2x
- Width: 13 - 2x
- Height: x

The volume of the container can be calculated using the formula: V = L * W * H.  the dimensions, we get:

V(x) = (48 - 2x)(13 - 2x)(x)

To find the maximum volume, we need to identify the value of 'x' that maximizes V(x). This can be achieved using calculus, by finding the critical points where the derivative of the function V(x) is zero or undefined.

Differentiating V(x) with respect to x and setting the derivative equal to zero, we can solve for the optimal value of 'x'. After performing these calculations, we find that the optimal size of the square to be cut out from each corner is approximately 1.52 inches. By removing 1.52-inch squares from each corner and folding up the flaps, the open-top container will have the maximum volume.

To know more about volume visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31606882

#SPJ11

The probability of washing dishes taking between 7 and 12 minutes is:
P(7 ≤ X ≤ 12) = (5/9) = 0.5556 or approximately 55.56%

The probability of washing dishes tonight taking between 7 and 12 minutes can be found by calculating the area under the probability density function (PDF) of the uniform distribution between 7 and 12 minutes. Since the distribution is uniform, the PDF is constant between 5 and 14 minutes and 0 elsewhere.

The total area under the PDF is equal to 1 (i.e. the probability that washing dishes takes any amount of time between 5 and 14 minutes is 1). To find the probability that washing dishes takes between 7 and 12 minutes, we need to find the area of the PDF between 7 and 12 minutes and divide it by the total area.

The width of the interval we are interested in is 12-7=5 minutes. The width of the whole interval is 14-5=9 minutes.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

He can wear 8 different outfits to school.

We have,

The boy can choose one pair of pants, one shirt, and one tie can be written as an expression as:

= 1 × 1 × 1

= 1 way.

He can choose one jacket in 8 ways.

Therefore, he can wear can be written as an expression as:

= 1 × 1 × 1 × 8

= 8 different outfits.

Thus,

He can wear 8 different outfits to school.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

The probability is again extremely low, approximately [tex]8.6 x (10)^{-14}[/tex]

The probability that less than 200 drivers in the sample wear a seatbelt can be calculated using the binomial distribution formula:

[tex]P(X < 200) = Σi=0 to 199 (500 choose i)  (0.4)^i (0.6)^{(500-i)}[/tex]

Using a calculator or software, we can find that this probability is extremely low, approximately 2.6 x 10^-33. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that less than 200 drivers in the sample wear a seatbelt.

Alternatively, we can use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution if certain conditions are met. For large enough n (in this case, n = 500) and a probability of success p (in this case, p = 0.4), the binomial distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution with mean μ = np and standard deviation [tex]σ= \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex].

Using this approximation, we can standardize the random variable X (number of drivers in the sample who wear a seatbelt) using the z-score formula:

[tex]z=\frac{(X-u)}{σ}[/tex]

Then, we can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the probability that X is less than 200, which corresponds to a z-score of approximately -7.36.

The probability is again extremely low, approximately [tex]8.6 x (10)^{-14}[/tex]. Therefore, we can conclude that it is highly unlikely that less than 200 drivers in the sample wear a seatbelt.

To know more about "probability" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The  series 4n^5 + 5n + 10 diverges.

To test the convergence or divergence of the series 4n^5 + 5n + 10, we can use the ratio test or the root test.

(i) Ratio test and root test are applicable to test this series.

(ii) Let's apply the ratio test. We compute:

lim(n→∞) |(4(n+1)^5 + 5(n+1) + 10)/(4n^5 + 5n + 10)|
= lim(n→∞) |(4(n+1)^5)/(4n^5) + (5(n+1))/(4n^5) + 10/(4n^5) + 5/(4n^4) + 10/(4n^5)|
= lim(n→∞) |(n+1)^5/n^5 + (5/4)(n+1)/n^5 + (5/2)/n^4 + (5/4)/n^5 + 5/(2n^4)|

The dominant term in the numerator is (n+1)^5, and the dominant term in the denominator is n^5, so the limit simplifies to:

lim(n→∞) |(1 + 1/n)^5 + (5/4n)(1 + 1/n)^4 + (5/2n^2)(1 + 1/n)^5 + (5/4n^3) + (5/2n^4)|

The limit of the first term is 1, and the limits of the other terms are all 0. Therefore, the limit of the absolute value of the ratio is 1, which is greater than 1. According to the ratio test, if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio is greater than 1, then the series diverges.

Therefore, the series 4n^5 + 5n + 10 diverges.

Visit to know more about Diverges:-

brainly.com/question/14689060

#SPJ11

Answer:

14 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Length of the trail = 70 miles

Let x miles be the distance that Alan has already covered from the beginning of the trial

Then the remaining distance to the end of the trail = 70 - x miles

We are given that 4 times the remaining distance is the distance already covered

Therefore x = 4(70-x)

x = 4 · 70 - 4x

x = 280 - 4x

x + 4x = 280

5x = 280

x = 280/5

or

x = 56

So distance covered = 56 miles

The distance that Alan still has to hike = 70 - 56 = 14 miles

So, the distance Alane still has to hike is the entire length of the trail, which is: y = 70 miles.

Let's start by assigning variables to the unknowns in the problem.

Let's call the distance Alan has hiked "x" and the distance he has left to hike "y". We know that the trail is 70 miles long, so we can set up an equation:

x + y = 70

We also know that after a few days, Alan's distance from the beginning of the trail (let's call that distance "d") is four times as far as he is from the end of the trail (which is 70 - d). So we can set up another equation:

d = 4(70 - d)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

d = 280 - 4d
5d = 280
d = 56

So Alan is 56 miles from the beginning of the trail and 14 miles from the end of the trail. Now we can go back to our first equation and solve for y:

x + y = 70
x + 56 + 14 = 70
x + 70 = 70
x = 0

So Alan has not hiked any distance yet, and the distance he still has to hike is the entire length of the trail, which is:

y = 70 miles

Therefore, the distance Alan still has to hike is 70 miles.

Know more about the variables

https://brainly.com/question/112703

#SPJ11

The value predicted from the proportions in the null hypothesis serves as a basis for comparison to determine if the alternative hypothesis is more plausible.

It seems like you're asking about an alternative hypothesis-testing technique. In this context, an alternative hypothesis is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is an effect or relationship between the variables being tested. Parameters are numerical values that describe the characteristics of a population, while a coefficient is a constant value that can modify the relationship between variables. When using an alternative hypothesis-testing technique, you will often test the parameters of a given population or model, making assumptions about how these parameters might change. The phi-coefficient is one such measure that can be modified to assess the effect size of the relationship between two variables.

Learn more about hypothesis here

https://brainly.com/question/606806

#SPJ11

The area of the composite figure is 234 square inches

To solve the rectangle;

The area of the rectangle would be:

12 x 14 = 168

Rectangle Area: 168

The area of that trapezium would be;

= 1/2 (12 + 10) 6

= 3(22)

= 66

Finally, add all the areas up,

66 + 168 = 234

Learn more about the area;

https://brainly.com/question/1658516

#SPJ1

Through a review of census records, Rebecca was able to determine that the mean age of the population she was studying was 23.4 years old. This is known as a(n) "average."

Through her analysis of census records, Rebecca was able to calculate the average age of the population she was studying. This value, which is the sum of all ages divided by the total number of individuals, is known as the mean. In this case, the mean age of the population was 23.4 years old. This statistic provides a useful summary of the age distribution of the population, but it should be noted that there may be variability or outliers that could impact the interpretation of the mean. Therefore, it is important to also consider other measures of central tendency and dispersion when analyzing data.

The average is calculated by adding up all the ages in the population and dividing the sum by the total number of individuals. This statistical measure helps provide a general understanding of the age distribution in the population, allowing for further analysis and comparisons to be made.

Learn more about average at: brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ11

There are 136 ways to distribute the 15 balls among the 4 boxes, including the possibility of having some boxes empty.

This problem can be solved using the concept of stars and bars. We need to distribute 15 balls into 4 boxes, which can be represented by 15 stars and 3 bars, where the bars separate the stars into 4 groups representing the 4 boxes. For example:

This represents 10 balls in the first box, 11 balls in the second box, 12 balls in the third box, and 2 balls in the fourth box.

The total number of ways to arrange 15 stars and 3 bars is then given by the formula:

{n+k-1\choose k-1} = {15+3-1\choose 3-1} = {17\choose 2} = 136

Therefore, there are 136 ways to distribute the 15 balls among the 4 boxes, including the possibility of having some boxes empty.

Learn more about combination here;

https://brainly.com/question/2295036

#SPJ1

The minimum cost of a soup can is 12 times the cube root of the volume of the can divided by 2π, and the dimensions of the can are given by:

[tex]r = (V/(2\pi ))^{(1/3)}\\h = 2V/[(\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(1/3))}][/tex]

To find the minimum cost of a soup can, we need to optimize the surface area of the can while considering the cost of each square centimeter of metal used.

Let's assume that the soup can is a right circular cylinder, which is the most common shape for a soup can. Let the radius of the can be "r" and the height be "h". Then, the surface area of the can is given by:

A = 2πr² + 2πrh

To minimize the cost, we need to minimize the surface area subject to the constraint that the volume of the can is fixed. The volume of a cylinder is given by:

V = πr²h

We can solve for "h" in terms of "r" using the volume equation:

h = V/(πr²)

Substituting this value of "h" into the surface area equation, we get:

A = 2πr² + 2πr(V/(πr²))

A = 2πr² + 2V/r

Now, we can take the derivative of the surface area with respect to "r" and set it equal to zero to find the value of "r" that minimizes the surface area:

dA/dr = 4πr - 2V/r² = 0

4πr = 2V/r²

r³ = V/(2π)

Substituting this value of "r" back into the equation for "h", we get:

h = 2V/(πr)

Therefore, the dimensions of the can that minimize the cost are:

[tex]r = (V/(2\pi ))^{(1/3)}\\h = 2V/[(\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(1/3))][/tex]

To find the minimum cost, we need to calculate the total cost of the metal used. The cost of the top and bottom is 4 cents per square centimeter, while the cost of the sides is 2 cents per square centimeter. The area of the top and bottom is:

A_topbottom = 2πr²

The area of the sides is:

A_sides = 2πrh

Substituting the values of "r" and "h" we found above, we get:

[tex]A_topbottom = 4\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(2/3)}\\A_sides = 4\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(2/3)}[/tex]

The total cost is:

[tex]C = 2(4\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(2/3)}) + 4(4\pi (V/(2\pi ))^{(2/3)}) = 12(V/(2\pi ))^{(2/3)[/tex]

for such more question on dimensions

https://brainly.com/question/13847072

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.469.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the exponential equation 27x = 9^(1/3) * 2^(2/3) * 3^(3/2), we can use the fact that 27 is equal to 3 raised to the power of 3, and 9 is equal to 3 raised to the power of 2. We can also rewrite 2^(2/3) and 3^(3/2) as powers of 2 and 3 respectively.

So, we have:

27x = 3^(3) * 9^(1/3) * 2^(2/3) * 3^(1/2)

27x = 3^(3) * (3^2)^(1/3) * (2^(2))^(1/3) * (3^(2))^(1/4)

27x = 3^(3) * 3^(2/3) * 2^(2/3) * 3^(1/2 * 2)

27x = 3^(3/3 + 2/3 + 1) * 2^(2/3)

27x = 3^(4/3) * 2^(2/3)

Now we can take the logarithm of both sides with base 3:

log₃(27x) = log₃(3^(4/3) * 2^(2/3))

log₃(27x) = 4/3 * log₃(3) + 2/3 * log₃(2)

log₃(27x) = 4/3 + 2/3 * log₃(2)

Simplifying the right-hand side:

log₃(27x) = 2 + 2/3 * log₃(2)

Now we can solve for x by dividing both sides by 27 and using a calculator to evaluate the right-hand side:

log₃(x) = (2 + 2/3 * log₃(2))/27

x = 3^(2 + 2/3 * log₃(2))/27

Using a calculator, we can approximate x to be x ≈ 0.469. Therefore, the solution to the equation 27x = 9^(1/3) * 2^(2/3) * 3^(3/2) is x ≈ 0.469.

Step-by-step explanation:

solve the exponential 3/2-×=1

This forest can support approximately 5 people based on its oxygen production.

To find out how many people the forest can support based on the amount of oxygen produced, we will use the given information:

1. The forest produces 970 kg of oxygen per metric ton of wood.
2. The average person breathes 165 kg of oxygen per year.

We'll first calculate the total amount of oxygen the forest produces, and then divide that by the oxygen consumption of one person to find out how many people the forest can support.

Your answer: A forest produces approximately 970 kg of oxygen for every metric ton of wood produced. If the average person breathes about 165 kg of oxygen per year, the number of people this forest can support can be calculated using the following steps:

Step 1: Determine the total amount of oxygen produced by the forest.
Let's assume the forest produces 1 metric ton of wood.
Total oxygen produced = 970 kg of oxygen per metric ton of wood x 1 metric ton of wood = 970 kg of oxygen.

Step 2: Calculate the number of people the forest can support.
[tex]Number of people =  \frac{Total oxygen produced}{Oxygen consumption per person}[/tex]
[tex]Number of people =  \frac{ 970 kg of oxygen}{165 kg of oxygen per person}[/tex]
Number of people = 5.88

Since we cannot have a fraction of a person, we round down to the nearest whole number. Therefore, this forest can support approximately 5 people based on its oxygen production.

To know more about "Oxygen" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28249947#

#SPJ11

The side length of the large frame is 4 inches longer than the side length of the small frame.

To find the difference in side lengths between the small square frame and the large square frame, we need to find the length of the sides of each frame.

Let x be the length of the side of the small square frame. Then, we know that the area of the small frame is 16 square inches.

Area of small frame = side length of small frame x side length of small frame = 16
[tex]x^2 = 16[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
[tex]x = 4 inches[/tex]

So, the length of the side of the small square frame is 4 inches.

Now, let y be the length of the side of the large square frame. We know that the area of the large frame is 64 square inches.

Area of large frame = side length of large frame x side length of large frame = 64
[tex]y^2 = 64[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
y = 8 inches

So, the length of the side of the large square frame is 8 inches.

To find the difference in side lengths, we subtract the length of the small frame from the length of the large frame:
[tex]y - x = 8 - 4 = 4[/tex]

Therefore, the side length of the large frame is 4 inches longer than the side length of the small frame.

To know more about "Square root" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/3120622#

#SPJ11

The argument presented in the question is a causal argument. It suggests that the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden is the cause of Democrats cheating and ultimately leading to Biden's victory in Pennsylvania

However, it is important to note that this argument is based on speculation and lacks evidence to support the claim of cheating. Additionally, the argument overlooks the fact that mail-in ballots were counted separately from in-person votes, and this delayed counting process could have led to the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden.

Therefore, it is crucial to gather statistical evidence and factual information before making any conclusions or accusations. The argument you provided is a causal argument. It claims that the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden,

which allegedly led to his win in Pennsylvania, is a result of cheating by the Democrats. This argument implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the alleged cheating and the output of the election in Pennsylvania.

To know more about output click here

brainly.com/question/30149485

#SPJ11

To match the confidence intervals with their respective percentages, you should compare the widths of the intervals. Confidence intervals with higher percentages (confidence levels) will be wider, as they include more data points from the sample.

1. Interval A: __%
2. Interval B: __%
3. Interval C: __%

Confidence intervals are a range of values that provide an estimate of the true population parameteric based on a sample of data. The percentage of confidence associated with the interval represents the likelihood that the true parameter falls within that range.

Typically, a higher percentage of confidence corresponds to a wider interval, as there is a greater likelihood that the true parameter falls within that range. Therefore, in order to match the interval to the percent of confidence it represents, you would need to consider the width of the interval and the corresponding likelihood of the true parameter falling within that range.

Once you have identified the widest interval, you can assign it the lowest percentage of confidence, and then work your way up to the narrower intervals, assigning them higher percentages of confidence based on their respective widths. Finally, you would label each interval with the appropriate percentage of confidence.

Compare the widths of the intervals. The widest interval corresponds to the 99% confidence level, the second widest to the 90% confidence level, and the narrowest to the 80% confidence level. Once you identify the widths, fill in the appropriate percentage after each interval.

Learn more about parametric click here:

brainly.com/question/30928348

#SPJ11

The probability that both adults think that most celebrities are good role models is approximately 0.034.

We can solve this problem using the hypergeometric probability distribution, which is used to calculate the probability of obtaining a certain number of "successes" (in this case, adults who think that most celebrities are good role models) in a sample drawn without replacement from a finite population (in this case, the sample of 1100 U.S. adults).

The probability of selecting one adult who thinks that most celebrities are good role models is:

p = 215/1100 ≈ 0.195

The probability of selecting two adults who think that most celebrities are good role models is:

P(X = 2) = (215/1100) * (214/1099) ≈ 0.034

Therefore, the probability that both adults think that most celebrities are good role models is approximately 0.034, or 3.4%. This means that if we were to randomly select two adults from the sample of 1100 U.S. adults, there is a 3.4% chance that both of them would think that most celebrities are good role models.

To know more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The total cost of the bike lock after applying the discount and sales tax is equal to $7.49.

Original price of the bike lock = $8.75

Discount percent on original price = 20%

The bike lock was marked down 20% from an original price of $8.75, This implies,

The discounted price is equal to,

= original price - 20% of original price

= $8.75 - 0.20($8.75)

= $8.75 - $1.75

= $7.00

The sales tax in Brookfield is 7%, so the additional tax Janet had to pay is,

= 7% of $7.00

= ( 7 / 100 ) × ($7.00)

= 0.07 × ($7.00)

= $0.49

This implies,

The total cost of the bike lock is equal to,

= $7.00 + $0.49

= $7.49

Therefore, the total cost of the bike lock was $7.49.

learn more about total cost here

brainly.com/question/29717647

#SPJ1

Frequency distributions, count the number of times each value or range of values appears in a dataset, while percentage distributions show the proportion or percentage of times each value or range of values appears in the dataset.

Frequency distributions are useful for summarizing and describing the distribution of a variable in a data set, while percentage distributions are useful for comparing different variables or subgroups within the data set.

For example, a frequency distribution could be used to show the number of hours of sleep each participant in a study gets per night, while a percentage distribution could be used to compare the number of hours of sleep between males and females in the study.

Frequency distributions and percentage distributions provide different perspectives on the same data set and can be used together to gain a more complete understanding of the data.

To know more about Frequency distributions, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30625605#

#SPJ11