Answer:
D raised their spirits
Explanation:
raising your spirit is an improvement. Im sorry if its wrong though
Let's read this picture!
What do you wonder or notice about this picture? Take a look at the details of this image and make an educated guess, or an inference, about what this image is trying to say.
I notice that only one of the men has a mask on, I notice that they are both getting gas. I wonder where they are both going. I think this image is trying to say that there are two types of people, people who wear masks and people who don't.
whats the theme of “ flies and spiders “ excerpt
a- fear in a hostile environment
b- order during confusing situation
c- cowardice in a dangerous time
d- authors during a period of struggle
When someone uses data, facts, and logic they're trying to appeal to
A. Ethos
B. Logos
C. Pathos
Answer:
logos
Explanation:
logos uses facts,studies, and statistics to appeal to their audience
help pleaseeee I’ll give crown to whoever is first.
Answer:
I believe its Infer, Hope this helps you
Write a description suggested by this image:
mark brainlest if answer is good.
Answer:
It was a dusty old cabin in the middle of the woods. Everything was covered in a thick layer of cobwebs and dust. A creepy old skeleton hung in the corner, a painting of its shadow hanging right next to it. The shelf was full of old, cracked jars, half of them full of spiders. A sack of 10 year old rice was slumped on the floor, dusty rice grains spilled on the tile. A table in the corner had dusty, broken dishes on the button shelf, and useless junk on the top shelf. Candles flickered all over, giving the room a spooky glow, and big, dusty brown vases hung from the ceiling. No one had been inside for at least 10 years. It gave you the most terrible case of the jitters.
Explanation:
Hope this can help.
Which word best completes the sentence for the author's purpose?
Please help me. I will mark you as brainliest !!
Look at the spaces indicated in the sentences below. Where would it be appropriate to put a semicolon (;) ?
A. The first words of her speech were uninspiringl "Um, I seem to
have misplaced my notes."
B. His suitcase held only a few items: a magazine from Kenyal two
carefully folded silk handkerchiefs, each with the monogram IAI
and a can of brown shoe polish.
C. There was only one problemſ I was stuck in a cardboard box.
D. They were getting ready to make the trip to the island. It was a
yearly ritual.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
a semicolon needs to be place for an independent clause and a connecting dependent clause
Answer:
in my opinion, D
Explanation:
PLZZ HELP ME I NEED HELP ITS DUE TODAY
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Its option C. because it grammatically make sense and it's grammatically correct.
Answer:
The answer is 50% bigger
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP
Which sentence best identifies the main idea for a summary of the excerpt?
Aside from those more obvious considerations touching Moby D*ck, which could not but occasionally awaken in any man’s soul some alarm, there was another thought, or rather vague, nameless horror about the whale, which at times by its intensity completely overpowered all the rest; and yet so mystical and well nigh ineffable was it, that I almost despair of putting it in a comprehensible form. It was the whiteness of the whale that above all things appalled me. But how can I hope to explain myself here; and yet, in some dim, random way, explain myself I must, else all these chapters might be naught.
A. The narrator tries to explain the horror of encountering the whale.
B. The narrator is most alarmed by the white color of the whale.
C. The narrator is amazed at the power and intensity of the whale.
D. The narrator considers the whale, Moby D*ck, to be mystical.
Answer:
B. The narrator is most alarmed by the white color of the whale.
Explanation:
plato/edmentum.
The correct option is B. The narrator is most alarmed by the white color of the whale the best identifies the summary of the passage.
Who is the author of ''The Whale''?Herman Melville, an American author, published The Whale in 1851. The novel is the sailor Ishmael's account of the obsessive hunt for vengeance by Ahab, the captain of the whaling ship Pequod, against Moby, the enormous white sperm whale that bit off Ahab's leg at the knee on the ship's previous expedition.
Thus, The destructive power of nature is represented by the white whale as a metaphor. Although nature is a neutral force that pursues its natural course without taking sides, Ahab appears to perceive nature as possessing power over him, which is something he cannot tolerate.
Learn more about The Whale here:
https://brainly.com/question/17104433
#SPJ2
Identify the prepositional phrase in the sentence.
Martha fell over the cat
Answer:
'over the cat' ?
Explanation:
This is a guess but from experience and other peoples answers I believe this it is because 'Martha' is a noun and a word not a phrase and same with each other individual word, same thing goes for 'the cat'
What is two things that all successful presidents have in common?
Answer:
They are male and lived in the white-house at some point.
3. Jesus taught about the Kingdom of God through complicated lectures on systematic theology.
True
False
Subject : religion
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Cuz Jesus was persecuted of those who opposed him from others religion like the Pharisees.
The woman who makes swell doughnuts, What new insight do the final two paragraphs provide?
Answer:2
im guessing.but you need to show the paragraph
Answer:
Explanation:
B
Describe a real life conflict you may encounter. Then describe how you would use the techniques you've learned to solve the conflict.
Please Help!!
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe the toughest conflicts to resolve are the ones in which you must make a choice, but all the options contain an element that seems to violate a value that is important to you. It is difficult to do the right thing when the “perfect” right thing is not among the choices you seem to face.
I was indicted, to my complete surprise, in May 2003. I was charged by the DOJ with 20 counts of criminal wrongdoing, all associated (somehow) with lying about technology. The charges seemed inexplicable to me, so I resolved to fight them even though I was offered many opportunities to enter into deals with the DOJ. The problem with the deals was that, even though I was told by everyone that they were “favorable” towards me, they required me to lie about something. It wasn’t the punishment that bothered me as much as being asked to lie.
Therefore, I fought the DOJ tooth and nail for nine years. I gave up my life savings (everything that was not frozen by the DOJ), my home, my family time, my social life, etc. to defend myself. To stretch my resources, I made my defense a full-time job, doing as much work myself as I could manage in order to save on legal fees. I worked seven days a week, learning the law, researching my case, helping to draft motions and briefs, preparing for trial, etc.
I endured a 3 1/2-month trial in 2005 and beat the DOJ. After the trial, through jury and court decisions, 14 of the original 20 counts were acquitted; all that was left were six counts on which the jury had hung. Instead of dismissing the remaining counts after their trial defeat, the DOJ re-indicted me on the six hung counts. I then went through two long appeal processes [to get the six hung counts dismissed]; both appeals made it as far as petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court. But, ultimately, the Supreme Court did not hear my appeals, so it was on toward a second trial.
I dedicated myself to preparation for the re-trial. By this time, it was no longer simply a personal struggle. The DOJ continued to offer deals, but I felt that I had a mission to defeat the DOJ again at trial. I had seen too much in the justice process that was not honorable and not right. And I felt that the system would never get better if people like me, who had the resources and temperament to fight, gave up in favor of a deal. The DOJ deserved to get defeated decisively and publicly at trial. I was ready and eager for trial, with more than three dozen witnesses, including the most credible people available — my attorneys told me that they had never before seen a more impressive group of witnesses. I desperately wanted my day in court.
But then I ran out of money. And this is where the conflict arose.
I could borrow money from people who freely offered it to me to continue my defense. Or I could accept a deal with the DOJ, by this time a quite “reasonable” deal. Neither choice was good. The deal stuck in my craw because it was a contrivance intended mainly to offer an easy way out for the DOJ, essentially a negotiated mutual cease fire rather than a rational settlement. But borrowing money was all but unthinkable to me — I could not stomach the idea of using other people’s money to defend myself — I did not want to spread the terrible financial impact of my indictment beyond myself and, most certainly, not to good friends.
Ultimately, I chose the deal. I simply could not ask others to accept a financial risk on my behalf when a deal was being offered by the DOJ that everybody told me was extremely favorable to me. I felt that using other people’s money to fight the DOJ would be self-indulgent, given the other options on the table. So my resolution was to accept the deal offered by the DOJ.
The truth is that I am not sure that this conflict has been resolved. I will always feel that I let others down, others caught in the same kind of insane trap which had ensnared me, by not seeing the fight through and finally beating the DOJ again at trial, decisively and publicly. Such a defeat might have helped those others in a way that a hollow deal cannot. Therefore, while I made a decision which ended one conflict, it really only launched another, and more intense, internal conflict which will be with me forever.
[You can read about the struggles of Rex Shelby and other Enron Broadband executives in two recently published books: Blogging Enron: The Enron Broadband Story by author and blogger, Cara Ellison; and Acquittal: An Insider Reveals the Stories and Strategies Behind Today’s Most Infamous Verdicts by prominent trial consultant, Richard Gabriel.
If you enjoyed Rex’s essay, please Recommend and Share it. And if you have questions or comments, please use the Notes feature here on Medium, or visit the Rumble Press Forums for a more in-depth discussion of the essay. You can also Follow Rumble Press on Medium for additional essays and stories. Thank you!]
(1) In 1970, Victoria, Australia passed the first law worldwide making safety belts required for drivers and front-seat passengers. (2) By 1991, over 80 jurisdictions worldwide had followed suit with the United States joining in 1984.
(3) Like all new things, the law was first met with ridicule and scorn. (4) Opponents claimed that it was an unwarranted intrusion by government into their personal lives and that it denied people the right to determine their own safety and health standards. (5) However, numerous reports have proved that the laws are necessary to save lives. (6) A study conducted in 1998 for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) called the Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey (MVOSS) revealed that "80 percent of the respondents use [safety belts] because doing so is required by law." (7) Considering that seat belts have saved over 135,000 lives between 1975 and 2001 imagine how high the death toll would be if seat belts were NOT required by law. (8) A statistical analysis conducted by the NHTSA says, an estimated 5,500 lives could be saved each year by increasing the level of safety belt use in the United States to 90 percent." (9) Currently, only 68 percent of Americans wear safety belts.
3
Which phrase in sentence 2 should be placed in parentheses?
A.
suit with the United States joining
B.
jurisdictions worldwide
C.
with the United States joining in 1984
D.
had followed suit
Answer:
C. with the United States joining in 1984
Explanation:
By 1991, over 80 jurisdictions worldwide had followed suit (with the United States joining in 1984).
Identify the type of conflict: Rainsford struggles to remain calm while he is
being hunted *
Answer:
man vs. self
Explanation:
The primary conflict in “The Most Dangerous Game” can be considered one of man vs. man, as Rainsford attempts to outrun and outwit the sadistic Zaroff, who hunts humans for sport. This conflict also includes elements of man vs. nature, as Rainsford is at the mercy of the elements on Ship-Trap Island and tries to use his jungle surroundings to his advantage. In addition, a man vs. self conflict is present in that Rainsford struggles with his own fear.
Who is the narrator in “Where’s Brownie?”
A.
Alex Jensen
B.
Evan
C.
Nick
D.
Sam Jensen
Alex Jensen is the narrator of the story, as shown in option A.
The narrator is the person who is telling the story. This narrator can be a character in the story or not and this completely changes the way the narration is done.
How can we understand who is the narrator of “Where’s Brownie?”The narrator of the story is a character and this can be perceived by the personal and possessive pronouns that the narrator uses.This leaves the narration with the first-person point of view.These pronouns show that the narrator was participating in the story, as a character and was narrating the facts he knows.At the beginning of the story, we can see that whoever is telling the facts is one of the sisters Sam or Alex Jensen.With the reading of the text, we realize that the narrator refers to Sam with possessive pronouns, which indicates that the narrator is Alex Jensen.
More information about the first-person point of view at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13845140
Which sentence uses the homophone "it's" correctly?
O A. Wear a hat because it's going to be cold today.
B. Let's look for it's owner.
C. Make sure to return the book to it's shelf.
D. Check the water to see if its boiling.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It's represents "it is," so simply it is in each sentence rather than it's. Then you will find that the correct answer is A. Hope this helps. :)
select the main verb
I believe that would be "taking", but please correct me if I'm wrong ^^
Answer: The verb Is taking. Please give me Brainliest
Explanation: verb
a word used to describe an action, state, or occurrence, and forming the main part of the predicate of a sentence, such as hear, become, happen.
50 POINTS. PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE TODAY!!
Answer all points pleasee
(What figure of speech does Crane use to describe the bombardment of the meadow? Is it effective? Why or why not? )
"For the little meadow which intervened was now suffering a terrible onslaught of shells. It's green and beautiful calm had vanished utterly. Brown earth was being flung in monstrous handfuls. And there was a massacre of the young blades of grass. They were being torn, burned, obliterated. Some curious little fortune of battle had made this gentle little meadow the object of the red hate of the shells, and each one as it exploded seemed like and imprecation in the face of a maiden,"
the passage can be best described as: "the british legislature extended an unwarranted jurisdiction".
we can say that because the text clearly states how the people of the colonies warned the british about their excessive desire to rule over them, without taking into consideration the difficulties their brothers had experienced in america: they struggled to establish the colonies, to adapt to new types of weather, fight with the natives, etc., and how they now see (or then saw) the only way out was to cut all ties with the british, since they ignored the people's petitions
Answer:
Crane uses personification frequently throughout this excerpt. He uses it to create images that vividly describe how Henry sees both the war and his surroundings in relationship to himself.
Explanation give me 5/5
mcandless sees his time in college as
a time of youthful naivate that he regretted
Answer:
13
Explanation:
13 13 13 13 14 13 13 13727373737373773737373
In gathering blue, how does the Council treat children and babies if they are deemed to have no value to the community?
Answer: Leave them in the Field of Leaving to die
Explanation:
In the village where Kira lived, if a child was born weak or with deformities, the Council and the village would recommend that the child be taken to the ''Field of Leaving'' outside the village where they would eventually die if they were not first killed by wild beasts who go there sometimes.
Kira was almost left there as she had a leg deformity but her mother used her influence to stop this from happening.
"You're right, man," George said. "But I don't want to teach—I want to be a doctor or nurse or something medical."
"I don't even know what you have to do to become something like that," Sampson said honestly.
"I don't either," George said. "But I figure you need big piles of money and about a million years to spend in college."
How do George’s career goals at the beginning of the story compare to his goals at the end of the story?
He still wants to be a doctor at the end of the story, but he no longer believes that becoming a doctor is an impossibility.
He still does not understand the hard work that goes into becoming a doctor at the end of the story, but he is no longer willing to try.
He does not know what he wants to do with his life at the beginning of the story, and he still struggles with this at the end.
He has clear ideas about how to achieve his goals at the beginning of the story, and he still has these ideas at the end.
Answer:
He still wants to be a doctor at the end of the story, but he no longer believes that becoming a doctor is an impossibility.
He still does not understand the hard work that goes into becoming a doctor at the end of the story, but he is no longer willing to try.
He does not know what he wants to do with his life at the beginning of the story, and he still struggles with this at the end.
He has clear ideas about how to achieve his goals at the beginning of the story, and he still has these ideas at the end.
please help i have to write a paragraph for a essay about thoughts you have had about conspiracy theories.
Answer:
Conspiracy theories can range from complete bogus to things that could be facts. For example, there was a conspiracy theory on the internet a few years ago about the Mandela effect, which was later proven wrong. However, around that timeframe a conspiracy theory was released, basically showing evidence that Elvis Presley did not die when he said he did. It is still currently being investigated. Many people enjoy seeing what people on the internet come up with, as well as coming up with theories of their own. Many people on different platforms on the internet have made a career using conspiracy theories, suck as popular creator Shane Dawson, and Jessii Vee. Honestly, you could consider conspiracy theories a genre on the internet now.
Explanation:
Hope this helped a little, feel free to change it if needed :))
Complete the sentence.
______is where the author does not include his personal feelings about the content.
A. Authority
B. Objectivity
C. Currency
Answer: The anser is indeed B. I'm sorry no one was her to help you in time.
God bless! <3
Extrapolation does not always predict the future accurately because..
Answer:
Extrapolation does not always predict the future accurately is explained below in complete detail.
Explanation:
In common, extrapolation is not very reliable and the outcome so received are to be observed with some shortage of confidence. the difficulty with extrapolation is that you have blank to verify how correct your model is outside the scope of your data. Because there are no data to back an extrapolation, one cannot apprehend whether the model is correct or not.
find the two adjectives
There are numerous economic consequences of drought; for example, farmers may lose money when crops die, and the cost of food may increase
Who is responsible for your education?
Explain your reasoning.
Answer:
The person responsible for our education is oursleves....
Explanation:
because we have to want to learn and want to push our selves to be succesful. Its not the teachers responsibilty to make us learn. they are just there ot help us. I dont know if this makes sense or not lol
One question........................
Answer:
c
Explanation:
When was Antigone written?
Answer:
441 BC
Explanation:
Antigone is a tragedy by Sophocles written in or before 441 BCE. Of the three Theban plays Antigone is the third in order of the events depicted in the plays, but it is the first that was written.