pls help me i’ll give you brainlist

Political scientist Shanto Iyengar argues that a process known as agenda setting sets a context that helps people understand important events and matters of shared interest.

Agenda setting describes the ability to influence the importance attached to issues on the (news media's) public agenda. This theory has been extensively studied and applied to various forms of media, suggesting that the media have the ability to shape public opinion by determining which issues receive the most attention.

Agenda-setting studies describe how media seek to influence audiences and establish hierarchies of news delivery. Judged to have more political power The country receives more media exposure. Setting the media agenda is influenced by media prejudices on issues such as politics, economics and culture. The development of agenda-setting and laissez-faire elements of communication research has facilitated the rapid growth and expansion of these perspectives. Agenda setting has phases that must occur in a certain order in order to be successful.

To know more about agenda setting -

https://brainly.com/question/22260748

#SPJ1

Economic competition, territorial disputes, and nationalist tensions fueled by colonialism were more significant underlying causes of WWI than alliances and arms build-ups, as suggested by documents E and F.

Document E argues that colonialism and the competition for colonies were the primary cause of the tensions between the major powers in Europe. It states that the major powers saw colonies as a symbol of their strength and status, and that the competition for colonies was a significant factor in the build-up to the war.

Document F supports this argument by stating that the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, was based on the principle of self-determination for all peoples, including those in the colonies. This indicates that the colonial powers were forced to give up their colonies after the war, suggesting that colonialism was a significant factor in the war.

Together, these documents suggest that colonialism was a key underlying cause of World War I. The competition for colonies led to tensions between the major powers and contributed to the arms build-up, but it was ultimately the desire for colonies that drove the major powers to war.

Learn more about World War I here: brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ4

Answer: No

Explanation: Shaka the Zulu's success in warfare cannot be wholly attributable to the nature of his upbringing, although it undoubtedly played a significant role. Shaka's upbringing gave him a unique perspective on warfare and leadership, as well as a deep understanding of the social and cultural dynamics of his people. This enabled him to develop military tactics and strategies that were highly effective in the context of Zulu society.

However, Shaka's success in warfare was also due to his personal qualities as a leader and military strategist. He was a charismatic and inspirational figure, who was able to inspire loyalty and commitment in his followers. He was also a brilliant military strategist, who developed innovative tactics and techniques that allowed the Zulus to defeat much larger and better-equipped armies.

Additionally, Shaka's success was also due to a number of other factors, such as his ability to forge alliances with neighboring tribes, his skill in diplomacy and negotiation, and the Zulus' superior weapons and military organization.

Therefore, while Shaka's upbringing played a significant role in his success, it would be inaccurate to say that it was wholly attributable to this factor alone. A combination of personal qualities, military strategies, social and cultural factors, and other contextual variables all contributed to his success in warfare.

Answer:

Explanation:

Immigration and Migration in the Early 20th Century: Challenges and Opportunities.

In the early 20th century, immigration and migration were significant social and political issues in the United States. This era was marked by large waves of immigrants and internal migration, which had far-reaching social, cultural, and economic implications for American society.

Between 1900 and 1920, over 14 million immigrants arrived in the United States. The majority of these immigrants came from Europe, with many coming from southern and eastern regions. These immigrants came seeking economic opportunity, religious freedom, and escape from political turmoil in their home countries. Many settled in urban areas, including New York City and Chicago, where they formed ethnic enclaves and contributed to the cultural diversity of American cities.

However, the influx of immigrants also sparked social and political tensions. Many native-born Americans felt threatened by the growing numbers of immigrants and feared that they would take their jobs and lower their wages. Anti-immigrant sentiment led to the passage of laws such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1924, which restricted immigration from certain countries and regions.

Internal migration also played a significant role in shaping American society in the early 20th century. African Americans and rural Americans moved to cities in search of economic opportunity, leading to the growth of urban centers and the emergence of new social and cultural trends.

The Great Migration, which began in the early 20th century and lasted through the 1960s, saw millions of African Americans move from the rural South to northern cities in search of better economic opportunities and to escape racial oppression. This migration led to the formation of new African American communities in urban areas and contributed to the growth of the civil rights movement.

Similarly, the Dust Bowl of the 1930s forced thousands of rural Americans to migrate to California and other western states in search of work and a better life. This internal migration had significant economic and social implications for both the migrants and the places they settled, as it led to changes in labor markets and urban development.

Overall, immigration and migration in the early 20th century had a profound impact on American society. These movements of people contributed to the growth of urban centers, cultural diversity, and economic development, while also sparking social and political tensions. Today, the legacy of immigration and migration in the early 20th century continues to shape American society, as the country remains a melting pot of different cultures, ethnicities, and backgrounds.

Ree Drummond's life is revealed in The Pioneer Woman: The best-selling cookbook author and award-winning blogger joins Food Network to demonstrate her unique style of home cooking, which ranges from casual get-togethers to formal occasions.

Ree Drummond is a celebrity chef, blogger, and photographer. She originally developed a following through her winner blog, The Pioneer Woman, which first started in 2006. She described what it was like for her family to live on to an Oklahoma ranch in her blog, and shortly after she started publishing recipes with artistic food photos. When she began on the Cooking Shows in 2011, her millions of devoted fans followed her there after she wrote a few books on her private life and passion for food.

to know more about Ree Drummond visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30543665

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Economic Issues series aims to make available to a broad readership of nonspecialists some of the economic research being produced in the International Monetary Fund on topical issues. The raw material of the series is drawn mainly from IMF Working Papers, technical papers produced by Fund staff members and visiting scholars, as well as from policy-related research papers. This material is refined for the general readership by editing and partial redrafting.

The following paper draws on material originally contained in IMF Working Paper 96/75, "Why Is China Growing So Fast?" by Zuliu Hu and Mohsin S. Khan of the IMF's Research Department. Rozlyn Coleman prepared the present version. Readers interested in the original Working Paper may purchase a copy from IMF Publication Services ($7.00).

Why Is China Growing So Fast?

In 1978, after years of state control of all productive assets, the government of China embarked on a major program of economic reform. In an effort to awaken a dormant economic giant, it encouraged the formation of rural enterprises and private businesses, liberalized foreign trade and investment, relaxed state control over some prices, and invested in industrial production and the education of its workforce. By nearly all accounts, the strategy has worked spectacularly.

While pre-1978 China had seen annual growth of 6 percent a year (with some painful ups and downs along the way), post-1978 China saw average real growth of more than 9 percent a year with fewer and less painful ups and downs. In several peak years, the economy grew more than 13 percent. Per capita income has nearly quadrupled in the last 15 years, and a few analysts are even predicting that the Chinese economy will be larger than that of the United States in about 20 years. Such growth compares very favorably to that of the "Asian tigers"--Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan Province of China--which, as a group, had an average growth rate of 7-8 percent over the last 15 years.

Curious about why China has done so well, an IMF research team recently examined the sources of that nation's growth and arrived at a surprising conclusion. Although capital accumulation--the growth in the country's stock of capital assets, such as new factories, manufacturing machinery, and communications systems--was important, as were the number of Chinese workers, a sharp, sustained increase in productivity (that is, increased worker efficiency) was the driving force behind the economic boom. During 1979-94 productivity gains accounted for more than 42 percent of China's growth and by the early 1990s had overtaken capital as the most significant source of that growth. This marks a departure from the traditional view of development in which capital investment takes the lead. This jump in productivity originated in the economic reforms begun in 1978.

Answer: b

Enlightenment philosophes believed they could codify the natural laws of human

Answer:

Which of the following was NOT a danger that merchants faced on the Silk Roads.

O Bandit attacks

O Natural disasters like avalanches

O Having their ship sunk by a storm

Wild animals

Explanation:

Having their ship sunk by a storm was NOT a danger that merchants faced on the Silk Roads, as the Silk Roads primarily involved overland trade routes and not maritime trade.

The Mongol ruler's policy towards people in the conquered territories was to use terror as a tool to prevent resistance. The statement is an example of the Mongol rulers' policy towards people in the conquered territories.

The Mongols' most consistent policy was to use terror as a tool to prevent resistance in the conquered territories. By demonstrating their ability to inflict unimaginable cruelty on anyone who opposed them, they believed they could discourage uprisings before they began. Other policies included maintaining stability within their own territories by allocating fiefs to the descendants of Genghis Khan's main family, Mongolisation of other ethnic groups, and encouraging trade and exchange between territories.

A successful empire was established and maintained by the Mongol rulers through the above policies.

For more such questions on Mongol

https://brainly.com/question/28884380

#SPJ11

Answer:

Occupational Asperirations.

Explanation:

Answer: yes

Explanation:

reason being, yes

Answer: I believe there is more context needed. But hope this helps:

Explanation:

The text does not mention anything about constitutional amendments in relation to immigration. The author is discussing the lack of legislative action in addressing immigration issues, particularly the problem of illegal immigration and the status of those who came to the United States unlawfully. The author mentions the creation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) programs by President Obama, which were subsequently challenged in court by Republican states. The author highlights the lack of action by Congress in addressing the issue, despite the ongoing legal challenges to the executive actions.

A price increase may cause a shortage.

A surplus will occur from a price cap above the level of the competitive equilibrium price. A shortage will occur if the price cap is lower than the price of competitive equilibrium.

Producer surplus declines in the event of a price ceiling below the market equilibrium price (shown in the illustration by the triangle formed by the region below p and above the supply curve). Depending on the demand function and the height of the price ceiling, consumer surplus may rise or fall.

To know more about shortage visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/15341256

#SPJ9

Question:

A price ceiling can result in which of the following?

A) a shortage

B) balance

C) surplus

D) has no effects

All of the following were political liabilities for democratic presidential candidate Al smith in 1928 except his hostility of Fundamentalist Democrats to his political campaign. So, option C is correct.

In the 1928 U.S. presidential election, Al Smith was the Democratic candidate, and he faced a number of political liabilities that made it difficult for him to win the election.

Religion: Al Smith was a Roman Catholic, and at the time, there was significant prejudice and suspicion toward Catholics in the United States, particularly among Protestant voters. Many voters believed that a Catholic president would be more loyal to the Pope than to the United States, and there were rumors and conspiracy theories about Catholic plots to take over the government.

Prohibition: Al Smith was a vocal opponent of Prohibition, which had been enacted as a constitutional amendment in 1919. However, in the 1920s, there was a growing movement in favor of Prohibition, particularly among rural and conservative voters. Smith's opposition to Prohibition made him unpopular with many voters, particularly in the South and West.

Immigration: Al Smith was a supporter of immigration and had spoken out against the restrictive immigration policies that had been put in place in the 1920s. However, there was significant anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States at the time, particularly against Eastern and Southern European immigrants. Many voters saw Smith as being too sympathetic to immigrants and worried that he would be too soft on immigration if he became president.

Urbanism: Al Smith was also seen as a representative of urban interests, particularly those of New York City. Many voters in rural areas and small towns saw him as out of touch with their values and way of life, and there was a perception that he would favor big cities over rural areas if he became president.

To know more about 1928 U.S. presidential election

brainly.com/question/278868

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

All of the following were political liabilities for democratic presidential candidate al smith in 1928 except his

A) significant prejudice and suspicion toward Catholics in the United States

B) movement in favor of Prohibition

C) hostility of Fundamentalist Democrats to his political campaign

D) anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States at the time, particularly against Eastern and Southern European immigrants

Answer:Algae

Explanation:

Answer:

The Jim Crow Laws had a huge impact on the Civil Rights movement because of limiting the rights and freedom of African Americans.

Explanation:

Answer:

In short, Crèvecoeur's narrative makes the claim that America's national identity is based upon the “American Dream”- that if you put your best effort forward and work hard enough, you can obtain anything you set your mind to, regardless of your race, religion, or financial standing.

Explanation:

hope helps

The Platt Amendment and its consequences most directly contributed to the anti-imperialist sentiments expressed in the excerpt.

What is the Platt Amendment? The Platt Amendment was an amendment to the Army Appropriations Act of 1901 which gave the United States the authority to intervene in Cuba's domestic affairs, such as political and economic issues, military matters, and other foreign relations. Furthermore, the Platt Amendment granted the United States the right to establish a naval base in Cuba. The Platt Amendment's imposition enraged many Cubans, who believed that the United States had replaced Spain as a colonial power and had robbed them of their independence. On February 20, 1901, the Platt Amendment was passed. As a consequence, the United States agreed to withdraw its forces from Cuba, but only after the amendment was included in the Cuban constitution.

The Platt Amendment and its consequences contributed to the anti-imperialist sentiments expressed in the excerpt by making it clear to the American people that their country's policies and actions abroad were no longer aimed at uplifting the masses, but rather at expanding its own wealth and influence in the world.

For more questions on Platt Amendment

https://brainly.com/question/10058271

#SPJ11

The unfair or unfavorable treatment of individuals or groups on the basis of traits like race, gender, age, or sexual orientation is known as discrimination.

What is discrimination, accommodation, boycott, disability, activist?

Something that is provided for comfort or to meet a need, such housing, food, and services, or travel accommodations and related services. commonly used in the plural. Overnight tourist lodgings are provided aboard boats.

to decline to purchase something or participate in something in order to show severe disapproval: The union issued a demand for a boycott of the gathering.

Any physical or mental impairment that makes it harder for the person with the disease to engage in particular activities and interact with others is referred to as a handicap.

one who promotes or engages in activism is someone who employs or supports forceful activities (such as open demonstrations) in favor of or against one side of a contentious subject.

Learn more about boycott:

https://brainly.com/question/878223

#SPJ1

The author's major thesis is the fact that the Constitution is becoming harder to modify even when it has grown increasingly vital to do so.

Although the Constitution was well-written, the author contends that the Founding Fathers could not have foreseen the issues which the United States might experience in the future. The need to update the Constitution to reflect advancements in technology, society, or governance grows as time goes on. In order to tackle the problems that the nation is currently facing, the author implies that it is a problem that it is difficult to alter the Constitution so it is necessary to do so.

To know more about Constitution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ1

Answer:

The U.S. supplied weapons and support to the Afghan rebels resisting the Soviet Forces

Explanation:

The U.S. hoped that they would be able to help stop the spread of Communism

The reason there were no states between Kansas and California and between Minnesota and Oregon is due to historical process of westward expansion in the United States during the 19th century.

Expansion refers to the process of increasing the size, volume, or scope of something. It can refer to physical expansion, such as when a company builds more factories or offices to increase production or presence in new markets. Expansion can also refer to the growth of an idea, concept, or theory, where it is developed and extended to cover more aspects or to apply to new situations. Economic expansion refers to the growth of a country's economy, measured by factors such as GDP, employment, and productivity. Expanding a business can involve investing in new products or services, hiring more employees, or expanding into new geographic locations. Expansion can bring opportunities for growth and development, but it also involves risks and challenges, such as increased costs, competition, and complexity.

To learn more about expansion, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2614672

#SPJ1

The author’s main argument about constitutional amendments is that the process is to rigid and its hinder the flexibility of adjusting the legislation based on present circumstances or issue.

The process of amending the United States Constitution is a rigid one because the framers of the Constitution intended for it to be a stable and enduring document. The process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult, requiring a supermajority of support from both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states.

This high threshold for amendment ensures that the Constitution is only amended when there is broad consensus among the American people, and that changes to the Constitution are not made lightly or in response to passing fads or temporary political movements. The rigidity of the amendment process is therefore designed to preserve the integrity and stability of the Constitution over time.

Read more about constitutional amendments

brainly.com/question/20336789

#SPJ1

Answer:

Because it had to be decided if this new land would be free or enslaved

Explanation:

The following occurred during the first stage (1789-92) of the French Revolution: The storming of the Bastille, the Tennis Court Oath, and the Rights of Man document.  All three are notable events in the early days of the revolution. Therefore the correct option is option A, B and F.

The storming of the Bastille happened on July 14, 1789. This was a very symbolic event that showed the power of the common people. The Bastille was a prison and a symbol of the oppression of the common people by the monarchy. The fall of the Bastille showed that the people could overcome the power of the monarchy.

The Tennis Court Oath took place on June 20, 1789. The National Assembly, which was composed of the third estate, gathered on a tennis court in Versailles. They took an oath to write a constitution for France that would limit the power of the monarchy and give more power to the people.

This was a significant event that demonstrated the power of the people in the new France. The Rights of Man document was adopted by the National Assembly on August 26, 1789.

The document was intended to limit the power of the monarchy and give more power to the people. It was a significant step toward democracy in France. Therefore the correct option is option A, B and F.

For such more question on French Revolution:

https://brainly.com/question/1046744

#SPJ11

The opening battle of the Spanish-American War took place in the Philippines in Manila Bay on May 1, 1898, an event in which the United States Navy, under the command of Commodore George Dewey, defeated the Spanish Pacific Squadron.

On May 1, 1898, in Manila Bay, the Philippines, the United States Navy, commanded by Commodore George Dewey, destroyed the Spanish Pacific Squadron in the first combat of the Spanish-American War. The battle, the Spanish-American War's opening military action, resulted in a huge win for the United States. As a result of the American victory, American forces were able to gain a foothold in the Philippines, which eventually led to the colonization of the entire archipelago by the US.

To know more about Spanish-American War

brainly.com/question/2827989

#SPJ4

Sharecropping was primarily created to address:

The labor shortage in agriculture following the Civil War.

The need to provide jobs for newly freed enslaved people.

The Civil War had a devastating impact on the Southern economy, especially in the agricultural sector. The war led to a severe shortage of labor as many able-bodied men, who were previously enslaved, either fled their former masters or were emancipated.

This left Southern landowners with a significant problem: they lacked the workforce necessary to cultivate their large plantations and farms. Sharecropping emerged as a solution to this labor shortage by allowing landowners to secure the labor they needed to work the land.

Learn more about Sharecropping from

https://brainly.com/question/24609477

#SPJ1

The Mongols' favorable attitude of artists was advantageous to them, because it ultimately promoted cross-cultural interaction and international communication. The Mongols sent craftsmen to their territories in China and Persia from every country in the known world.

The Mongol empire increased trade outside of A-fro-Eur-asia because officials actively encouraged traders and the growth of trade and commerce within their own borders. Because they recognized how essential trade was to the health of their economy and realm, the Mongols actively promoted it.

The Mongol influence improved both trade and communication along the Silk Road by creating a postal relay system. The Mongols helped the Silk Road's culture grow by encouraging religious tolerance.

Learn more about The Mongol empire: https://brainly.com/question/18001458

#SPJ1

Washington believed that the cost of a two-party system was the emergence of a climate of bitter partisanship, the pursuit of power and influence by rival factions that would ultimately threaten the unity and prosperity of the country.

In his farewell address, George Washington warned against the dangers of political factions and the emergence of a two-party system. He argued that such a system would inevitably lead to "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" seeking to advance their own interests at the expense of the public good, and would create a climate of bitter partisanship that would undermine the stability and effectiveness of government.

He believed that loyalty to political parties would become more important than loyalty to the nation, and that the pursuit of power and influence by rival factions would ultimately threaten the unity and prosperity of the country. He urged Americans to resist the temptation to form political parties and to cultivate a spirit of unity and patriotism that would allow them to work together for the common good.

Read more about two party system

brainly.com/question/26695072

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. Five historical items in the political cartoons/photos that are important or interesting include:

2. These cartoons illustrate the extreme economic and social hardship faced by Americans during the Great Depression. They show the desperation and struggle of people to find work and food, and the failure of the government to provide adequate assistance.

3. The tone and emotion in the political cartoons/photos are often somber and bleak, with images of long lines, poverty, and despair. There is also a sense of anger and frustration directed towards the government and the wealthy elite who are seen as responsible for the economic crisis.

4. Symbols in the cartoons include the breadlines and unemployment lines, which represent the massive unemployment and poverty that affected so many Americans. The Hoovervilles and bank failures symbolize the failure of the government and financial institutions to provide aid and stability. The Dust Bowl symbolizes the natural disaster that compounded the economic crisis.

5. These political cartoons/photos provide a powerful and poignant reminder of the devastating impact of the Great Depression on American society. They raise questions about the role of government in times of crisis, and the responsibility of the wealthy and powerful to help those in need. They also highlight the resilience and determination of ordinary people in the face of incredible hardship.