Answer:
C
Explanation:
The word from the list that best fits the definition is a sophist. Thus the correct option is C.
What is a sophist?Any specialized group in the fifth century BC was known as a sophist. Greek teachers and philosophers who discussed theology, metaphysics, and the sciences were later labeled by Plato as superficial rhetoricians.
Support for those who practice this type of instruction ultimately declined as a result of the habit of charging fees and the readiness of many Sophists to exploit their rhetorical abilities to pursue unfair legal actions.
It is crucial to study his thoughts in order to comprehend the historical and sociopolitical setting of ancient Greek society as well as the rhetorical and cognitive patterns of the period.
Therefore, option C is appropriate.
Learn more about sophist, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28728956
#SPJ2
The complete question is Probably
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Greek philosophers and teachers who speculated on theology, metaphysics, and the sciences, and who were later characterized by Plato as superficial manipulators of rhetoric and dialectic.
Does anyone know the answer? Please help ASAP.
Which was the first major defeat in Europe for Hitler?
A.
Battle of Midway
Battle of Britain
OB.
OC. Battle of the Bulge
OD.
Battle of Stalingrad?
Answer:
battle of Stalingrad
Explanation:
Answer: It was the Battle of Britain in 1940
Explanation: The end date of each battle.
Battle of Britain - Oct 31, 1940
Battle of Midway - June 7, 1942
Battle of Stalingrad - Feb 2, 1943
Battle of the Bulge - Jan 25, 1945
Please if anyone can help me answer this?
What factors led to the division of Germany between the United States and Russia?
Notice: I'll edit my answer if I interpret this incorrectly.
So rephrasing this and excluding certain parts, a new question can be made: What were the reasons for division of Germany?
At the Yalta conference after World War II, Germany was split into four zones of occupation; the occupying countries were the UK, France, the USA, and the USSR. Berlin was located in the USSR-occupied zone; as a result, the other allies insisted that Berlin be divided into four as well.
The elections that will take place the next year were intended to gradually bring Germany back together.
The US and USSR's wartime alliance—or, more generally, the tense partnership between communism and capitalism—started to break down once their shared opponent, Nazi Germany, was destroyed. Both the USSR and the western nations worried that Germany would elect a communist administration, while the USSR believed that Germany would maintain its capitalist system. Neither side trusted the other to conduct free and fair elections. Because neither side wanted to give up control over Germany, occupation continued.
The merging of three of the zones started between 1946 and 1949. First, the British and US zones amalgamated to become Bizonia, a semi-state, then the French joined them in Trizonia.
The USSR-run portion, meanwhile, remained strongly aligned with the USSR. The Cold War started to worsen and it became obvious that the alliance was gone during the Berlin Blockade of 1948–1949, when the Russians cut off what had become West Berlin from the outside world. West Berlin remained under the supervision of the UK, USA, and France, but West Germany as a whole was very different from East Germany.
Perhaps the most significant division occurred when "West Germany" joined NATO, an alliance primarily created to protect against communism, and "East Germany" joined the communist Warsaw Pact. They were now basically two distinct states, each with its own ideology.
Elections were conducted shortly afterward, and the two states formally separated from one another.
Germany was never designed to be divided into the east and west. The USSR and USA were completely distrusted, which led to the gradual and seemingly inevitable split.
Fortunately, the reunification of the two halves of Germany in 1990 was a historic event on both a national and global scale.
What was the network of safe houses that assisted runaway enslaved persons?
a.
slave houses
c.
Underground Railroad
b.
runaway houses
d.
slave codes
Answer:
Under-ground railroad
What role did the sixteenth-century religious reformer John Calvin argue that predestination played in human salvation
According to the reformer John Calvin, the role that predestination played was that He argued that God had determined beforehand whom he would save.
Who was the reformer John Calvin?This is the person that was one of the theologians and the preachers in the period of the French Protestant.
The protestant age was seen with the refusal to follow the doctrines of the Catholic church in Europe .This led to the fact that the church had to split.
John was one of the spokesperson for the protestant reformation. He was regarded as one of the leading figures of the reformation.
Read more on John Calvin here:
https://brainly.com/question/426236
#SPJ1
Which practice was more likely to be accepted after the scientific revolution than before
The question is incomplete but I have the entire one:
Which practice was more likely to be accepted after the scientific revolution than before?
A. Scientists deriving much of their knowledge from the Bible
B. Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar
system
C. Scientists challenging traditional beliefs about the way the
universe works
D. Scientists attending universities controlled by the Catholic Church
Answer:
B). Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar system.
What was revolutionary about the Scientific Revolution? How did the study of nature in the 16th century differ from the study of nature in the Middle Ages?
Disclaimer: I can only write with confidence about paradigm shifts between medieval and Renaissance alchemy.
Here's what Robert Boyle wrote in The Sceptical Chymist (1661):
And, to prevent mistakes, I must advertize you, that I now mean by elements, as those chymists that speak plainest do by their principles, certain primitive or simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved: now whether there be any such body to be constantly met with in all, and each, of those that are said to be elemented bodies, is the thing I now question.
[Note: I realize this is not from the 16th Century, but the 16th Century is just too soon if you want solid answers about the differences you are inquiring about.]
Bear with me here because this might get a bit out of hand.
In The Birth of the Clinic, Michel Foucault explains in great detail what he refers to as the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century. According to Foucault, the "medical gaze" was a state of mind in which physicians at the time were able to "gaze" upon any number of patients and read and interpret the various signs in order to determine the symptoms.
For example, let's say two patients have pneumonia, but one patient coughs violently whereas the other patient simply wheezes. Both possess the symptom of fluid in the lungs, but the signs are completely different.
For Foucault, the "medical gaze" represents a newfound perception of nature anticipating the advent of what we now call structural linguistics. In structural linguistics, language consists of two elements--the sign and the signified, where the sign is the symbol or word on the page and the signified is the meaning. According to Ferdinand de Saussure, the founder of structural linguistics, the sign is completely arbitrary: we agree to call red "red", but we could just as easily agree to call red "farfignuggen" and none would be the wiser.
So the signified is static, but the sign can be dynamic. This is the crux of the "medical gaze": regardless of how many different signs there are (coughing, wheezing, heaving breathing), the physician can still read and interpret those signs in order to determine the symptom (fluid in the lungs). The signs are dynamic, the symptom is static.
Now let's answer your question.
Up until Robert Boyle wrote The Sceptical Chymist, alchemists approached nature the same way physicians approached symptoms in the 19th Century.
During the Middle Ages, every aspect of nature--from wood to metal to the planets themselves--consisted of two opposing elements, Mercury and Sulphur. The problem is that the signs alchemists used to signify those elements changed as if based on the time of day. For one alchemist, Mercury was a woman bearing buckets of water from a well. For another, Mercury was a green lion. For others, Mercury was simply Quicksilver. The element remained the same (for the most part) all the way into the Renaissance, but the signs (woman with water, green lion, quicksilver, etc) changed constantly.
While the signs of symptoms changed based on patients' immune systems, the signs of Mercury changed based on which alchemist was writing about Mercury.
And while Foucault called attention to the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century, one could just as easily call attention to an "alchemist's gaze" of the Middle Ages and the Early Renaissance.
Robert Boyle changed all of that. He came out and he said, "Forget this fickleness! We need one sign and one sign only. And we need to agree! No more calling this element by ten different names. No more correspondence systems. We need to agree and we need to do it now."
Of course, I am paraphrasing in a rather silly way, but that's the gist of what he meant when he wrote the passage I quoted at the beginning. What eventually became a rising trend in medicine was an old trend in alchemy that needed to be quashed for completely different reasons.
So it's not a matter of how the 16th Century differed from the Middle Ages, but how the Late Renaissance called an end to the fickleness of the Natural Philosophy that preceded it.
5. What started the expansion of trade?
Answer:
imporved transportation
Explanation:
it led to increasing trade and the spread of networks
50 points! under products liability, the manufacturer or seller of a product faces strict liability.
true
false
True the manufacturer or seller of a product faces strict liability.
Product liability refers to the liability of one or all parties along the manufacturing chain of a product for damages caused by that product. These include component manufacturers (top of the chain), assemblers, wholesalers, and retail owners (bottom of the chain).
Products with inherent defects that are harmful to consumers (or product lending, gifting, etc.) are subject to product strict liability claims. Products are generally considered tangible property, but product liability extends this definition to intangible assets (such as gas), natural goods (such as pets), real estate (such as housing), and documents (such as navigation charts). Product liability comes primarily from tort law.
Learn more about products liability at
https://brainly.com/question/17132440
#SPJ1
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
i took the test
Which two factors caused Siddhartha Gautama to give up his riches and leave his home?
A)He no longer wanted to be married, so he left the palace.
B)Riches disgusted him, and he wanted to live like an ordinary person.
C)He sought freedom from the family responsibilities that caused him suffering.
D)The types of suffering he saw made him question his privileged lifestyle.
E)He wanted to find the root of suffering and discover how to eliminate it.
The two factors that caused Siddhartha Gautama to give up his riches and leave his home are He no longer wanted to be married, so he left the palace. Option A. This is further explained below.
What is Siddhartha Gautama?Generally, In the sixth and fifth century BCE, a Hindu prince who had abandoned his rank and fortune to become a spiritual ascetic succeeded in his quest for enlightenment and, by teaching others about his way, created Buddhism in India. 23
In conclusion, It was because he no longer desired marriage that Siddhartha Gautama gave up his wealth and fled the palace.
Read more about Siddhartha Gautama
https://brainly.com/question/12040257
#SPJ1
The ______ level of analysis describes the argument that through interaction, the United States and the Soviet Union came to see each other as enemies, not rivals.
The systemic level of analysis describes the argument that through interaction, the United States and the Soviet Union came to see each other as enemies, not rivals.
What is systemic level of analysis?The results of an investigation at the systemic level, which takes into account all states, are explained.
By taking into account the characteristics or organisational structure of the international political system during the time under investigation, it looks for answers for global events.
Some key features of systemic level of analysis are-
According to the international or systemic level of analysis, it is not even necessary to consider the internal traits of states or persons in order to comprehend foreign policy in its entirety. Instead, features of the international system influence how countries operate in relation to their level of power.The tension between the Soviet Union and the US resolved as-
Over time, the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States fluctuated between cautious cooperation and frequently acrimonious superpower rivalry as a result of a complex interaction of ideological, political, and economic reasons.The United States and Soviet Union formed an alliance during World War II out of necessity and a shared understanding that each nation required the other to overcome one of the most deadly and destructive forces of the twentieth century.To know more about three levels of analysis, here
https://brainly.com/question/14725298
#SPJ4
3
5
7
8
9
10
which was a result of the rebellion of 1641?
the power of the english grew.
o the irish converted to catholicism.
o the irish won the respect of the english.
o calls for irish independence were no longer heard.
Answer:
the irish converted to catholicism
Question 10 Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) When you make a choice, the experience from what would have been your second option is called O trade-off O supply O demand O opportunity cost
When you make a choice, the experience from what would have been your second option is called opportunity cost.
What is opportunity cost?Opportunity costs can be regarded as the economical term that describe the potential benefits that an individual as well as the investor, were not be able to benefit from when they are choosing one alternative over another.
It should be noted that opportunity costs are can be easily overlooked, and hence, When you make a choice, the experience from what would have been your second option is called opportunity cost.
Learn more about opportunity cost on:
https://brainly.com/question/481029
#SPJ1
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST for detailed information: who was Joan of Arc
Answer:
Joan of Arc was a French peasant girl. She rose to immense providence fighting with the Dauphin of France Charles against the English. Joan of Arc was the one who helped Dauphin defeat the English and reclaim French lands.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
If not, I am sorry.
HELP!!! What did Henry IV have to do to regain control of France after a period of civil war?
Switch allegiance from Spain to England
Pull the nation out of the Thirty Years' War
Grant freedom to Protestants
Personally change from Protestantism to Catholicism
Henry IV had to grant the Protestants freedom (option C) to regain control of France after a period of civil war.
Who was Henry IV?Henry of Bourbon (1553-1610) was King of France as Henry IV between 1589 and 1610. He is popular for being considered the best monarch who has governed his country, due to his concern to guarantee a dignified life to all his subjects.
One of his most outstanding ideas was that of peace and prosperity because after the religious civil war that took place in France between Protestants and Catholics, he decided to grant freedom of worship to Protestants to avoid more war conflicts.
Learn more about Henry IV in: https://brainly.com/question/1193750
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is D) Personally change from Protestantism to Catholicism.
Explanation:
I know this because I took the exam! Hoped I helped! :)
President Franklin Roosevelt's political philosophy was the idea that the government
should:
O promote the growth of monopolies
) directly help those in need
© stay out of economic affairs
How did the united states government view the rwanda crisis while it was happening?
The U.S. government viewed it was necessary to stop the war, hen,ce pledged to work with the UN to set up a war crimes tribunal and human rights monitoring.
What was the Rwanda crisis?It was popularly known as the Rwandan genocide that occured against the Tutsi in Rwanda in 7 April and 15 July 1994 during the Rwandan Civil War.
Around this time, members of the Tutsi minority ethnic group and some moderate Hutu and Twa were killed by armed militias.
The main cause of the genocide was the death of the Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana that occured when his plane was shot down above Kigali airport on 6 April 1994.
Read more about Rwandan genocide
brainly.com/question/17089832
#SPJ1
explain how the american revolution and the civil war expanded principles and american ideals
The American Revolution and Civil War expanded American principles and ideals through the US Declaration of Independence and the gains of rights to citizens.
What was the American Revolution?It was a series of struggles fought by American citizens for the end of English colonization, as the colonists were dissatisfied with the great exploration of the colonies and lack of rights, thus instituting the Independence of the United States on July 4, 1776.
Therefore, the American Revolution had as its objectives the freedom of the country from colonization, while the Civil War had as its objectives the emancipation of slaves and the victory of the Union, both being movements in favor of the conquest of rights.
Find out more about American Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/18317211
#SPJ1
Marcus Garvey created a movement encouraging black Americans to migrate to Africa. To do this he created which of the following Question 6 options: A new immigration-friendly government in Ghana A church that spread throughout the United States and the Caribbean A shipping company called the Black Star Line A widely circulated newspaper called The Crisisthat promulgated his ideas
Option 3. Marcus Garvey created a movement encouraging black Americans to migrate to Africa. To do this he created A shipping company called the Black Star Line.
Why did Marcus Garvey Create the Black Star line?The reason for this was to facilitate a relationship between the blacks in America with the blacks that are in Africa. This was a way to enhance black nationalism around the world.
Marcus Garvey was a founder of the Universal Black movement in America. He wanted the blacks to be in touch and have harmonious dealings within themselves.
Read more on Marcus Garvey here:
https://brainly.com/question/13512802
#SPJ1
Is this correct? Or is it a different answer?
Answer: Yes, both the communist U.S.S.R. and the fascist Nazi Germany had a secret police force, a lack of free press and free speech, and a HUGE lack of checks and balances over government power.
Where were most of the society of american indians educated?
Yakima Indian Reservation in the state of Washington.
give me best
Most of the American Indians in the United States had attained their primary education at the Yakima Indian Reservation in the state of Washington.
What is the significance of education among the American Indians?The American Indians in the society had a lack of access to better educational facilities, as their education was under the control of the Whites as well as the colonists. They had held protests for gaining access to education and other related facilities.
Due to the less availability of options, most of the American Indians were forced to complete their education in the facilities in the state of Washington, out of which Yakimas were the most educated ones.
Therefore, the significance regarding education among the American Indians has been aforementioned.
Learn more about education among the American Indians here:
https://brainly.com/question/9828437
#SPJ2
What was the key difference between the consequences faced by the United States and the Soviet Union after the Cold War?
The Cold War influenced domestic policy two ways: socially and economically. Socially, the intensive indoctrination of the American people led to a deterioration of social reforms. Economically, enormous growth spurred by initiatives related to war was aided by heavy government development.
What happened between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War?Throughout the Cold War the United States and the Soviet Union avoided direct military conflict in Europe and engaged in actual combat systems only to keep allies from defecting to the other side or to overthrow them after they had done so
What are 5 effects of the Cold War?5 Key Cold War Events
Containment of Russia.Arms Race Between the United States & RussiaStory of the Hydrogen BombSpace investigationFall of the Berlin Wall.To learn more about Cold War, refer
https://brainly.com/question/1192457
#SPJ9
10. The Pueblo Revolt in Spanish New Mexico a. virtually destroyed the Hopi tribe. b. was staged by Mexican peasants who wanted a more democratic government. c. was more successful than any other Indian rebellion in American history. d. permanently freed the Navajos and Apaches from Spanish authority. e. threatened the British settlements.
The Pueblo Revolt in Spanish New Mexico (d.) permanently freed the Navajos and Apaches from Spanish authority.
During the well planned Pueblo Rebellion (1680), Pueblo Indians (in alliance with Apaches) overthrew Spanish control in New Mexico for 12 years. The Pueblos, a typically peaceful tribe, had survived for a very long time following the colonization of New Mexico in 1598.Having successfully driven the Spanish out of New Mexico, they returned 12 years later to a changed power structure. Due to its role in preserving Pueblo cultural practices, lands, languages, and sovereignty, the Pueblo Revolt is a significant historical event.
What happened in Pueblo Revolt?
Pueblo Rebellion, (1680), carefully organized revolt of Pueblo Indians (in league with Apaches), who succeeded in overthrowing Spanish rule in New Mexico for 12 years. A traditionally peaceful people, the Pueblos had endured much after New Mexico's colonization in 1598.Learn more about Pueblo Revolt
brainly.com/question/14420725
#SPJ4
Samuel Seabury was a prominent and outspoken pamphleteer in the years before the American Revolution. Which of the following statements about him are correct
Therefore, what describes Seabury is:
A Loyalist who opposed war with Britain.The United States' first Episcopal bishop.Know more about Samuel Seabury here:
https://brainly.com/question/12860357
#SPJ4
What did the development of a national identity have in common in England and in Spain?
National identity in both emerged during conflict with a perceived threat.
They both united without any influence from the Church.
They both embraced an identity of religious pluralism.
They both developed a national identity rapidly, within a single generation.
NEED ANSWER NOW PLSSS! IVE BEEN WAITING FOR 20 minutes
They both embraced an identity of religious pluralism, the development of a national identity have in common in England and in Spain. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is national identity?
The term national identity refer to the person reflect the citizen identity. The national identity is the person own identity to belong to the which state or the country. A person represent her culture, tradition, dress codes, and language. There are the different national identity such as national flag, language, flower, sports, tree, anthem, bird, and animal.
The English, Welsh, and Scottish are England's three main national identities. Spain's developed identities, on the other hand, are regional identities, such as Basque and Catalan, that necessitate the full articulation of a national identity. Both identities are religiously pluralistic.
Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on national identity, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14690984
#SPJ2
Chiropractic treatment was the subject of a bitter fight during the middle of the 20th century. What group tried to keep chiropractors from practicing
Chiropractic treatment was the subject of a bitter fight during the middle of the 20th century, and the group tried to keep chiropractors from practicing is The American Medical Association.
What is Chiropractic treatment ?Chiropractic adjustment serves as the method that is been used to apply a controlled as well as sudden force to a spinal joint.
This is been done by chiropractors, and the group tried to keep chiropractors from practicing is The American Medical Association.
Learn more about Chiropractic treatment at:
https://brainly.com/question/14659009
#SPJ1
Shaysa's rebellion was significant because it demonstrated?
Shays's Rebellion exposed the weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation and led many—including George Washington—to call for strengthening the federal government in order to put down future uprisings.
QUESTION 1
Please put the following events in chronological order.
✓Civil War
American Revolution
✓ Mexican War
War of 1812
French & Indian War
French and Indian was evented in the years 1754 - 1763
American Revolution was evented during the years 1765 - 1791
War of 1812 was fought during the years 1812 - 1815
Mexican War 1846 - 1848
American civil war was evented during the years 1861 - 1865
What is a War?A war is an act of fight between the two or more countries, this involves using the weapons and heavy bombing as a result of war many individuals including soldiers and citizens lost their lives.
Not only men but also women and children are harmed in a war, there should be world peace as the wars result in only destruction for both the countries or the number of countries involved in this.
Peace should be maintained and conflicts should be resolved on a table talk, the wars in the past are presented in the chronological sequence in the first part above.
Learn more about War at https://brainly.com/question/26962525
#SPJ1
What do you think Rousseau means by a
government’s independence?
Why do folklores get adapted over time?
Answer:
As tales are repeated and passed on, they are inevitably changed as they are retold regardless of the storytellers' intentions. With no way to differentiate the original tale from an adapted one, no one truly knows how old the tales are or what form is truly authentic. With that said, the version of the tale told is affected by the person telling it the tale. Their young, socioeconomic status, family ties, and life experiences all affect the narrative of the story as each person may find value in different aspects of the same tale; a “conundrum about the universal use of the story to help people come to terms with the fears, the challenges and the mysteries that are all part of life”
South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks murdered John Brown before Brown could be tried for his actions at Harpers Ferry. beat Senator Charles Sumner with a cane. defeated Abraham Lincoln in the 1858 Illinois gubernatorial race. argued that slavery should be limited to the south. led religious opposition to slavery in the south.
South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks beat Senator Charles Sumner with a cane before John Brown could be tried for his actions at Harpers Ferry.
Therefore, option A is correct.
The Trial of John BrownThe Trial of John Brown was an important part of Massachusetts history.
One if the highlights of the Trial was the canning of Charles Sumner by the Congressman from Massachusetts Preston Brooks.
The trial was based on murder of John Brown.
Learn more about the trial of John Brown at https://brainly.com/question/1177013
#SPJ1