please help me on this will give you brainliest

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the fraction:

Rationalize the denominator by multiplying (7 - √14x):

Matching choice us A

Answer:

1,712,304 ways

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem bothers on combination

Since we are to select 5 subjects from a pool of 48 subjects, the number of ways this can be done is expressed as;

48C5 = 48!/(48-5)!5!

48C5 = 48!/43!5!

48C5 = 48×47×46×45×44×43!/43!5!

48C5 = 48×47×46×45×44/5!

48C5 = 205,476,480/120

48C5 = 1,712,304

Hence this can be done in 1,712,304ways

Answer:

yuojsjsjskakavbhjsmsnnxjxj

Answer:

The p-value is 0.07, which is more than 0.05. Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. a=9 2. k=0 3. w=3 4. x= 5 5. v=14 6. f=8 7. u=5 8. c=1 9. s=8 10. q=1/7 11. k= 1/5 12. j=9 13. r=120 14. b=1.4 15. g= 3.1 and 16. m=25

I also post a picture on how I got each answer.

Hope this helped you out

Answer:

a=9 2. k=0 3. w=3 4. x= 5 5. v=14 6. f=8 7. u=5 8. c=1 9. s=8 10. q=1/7 11. k= 1/5 12. j=9 13. r=120 14. b=1.4 15. g= 3.1 and 16. m=25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

28 units

hope this helps have an amazing day

Answer:

option b.

61/1000.

................

Answer:

B: 61/1000

Step-by-step explanation:

B: 61/1000 = 0.061

as a percent is 6.1%

Therefore B or 61/1000 is correct hope this helped!

Answer:

it doesnt have any perfect root

Step-by-step explanation:

but in decimal it is 14.97......

Answer:

4√14

Step-by-step explanation:

√224 = √2^5 · 7

         = 4√14

Answer:

4 1/2 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

I think but I'm not for sure

Answer:

C. 609

Step-by-step explanation:

In the question, 4-digits number were given to be divided by a 2-digits number. Without performing the division, it is only reasonable to say that the quotient will be a 3-digits number.

In the given options, the only 3-digits number is 609

Also, you can multiply 609 by 12 to check how reasonable your guess is.

⇒ 609 x 12 = 7308

The difference between 7315 and 7308 is 7.

The remaining number (7) is not up to 12 and when 7 is divided by 12 it will not give a whole number digit.

Therefore, the only reasonable quotient in the given options is 609.

Answer:

24 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

same i dont know just need points but good luck

Answer:

DF = 28 units

AC = 64 units

CF = 32 units

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given triangle ABC points D, E and F are the midpoints of the sides AB, BC and AC.

By midsegment theorem,

"Segment joining the midpoints of each side is parallel and measure the half of the opposite side"

DF = [tex]\frac{1}{2}(BC)[/tex]

     = [tex]\frac{56}{2}[/tex]

     = 28 units

AC = 2(DE)

     = 2 × 32

     = 64 units

CF = [tex]\frac{1}{2}(AC)[/tex]

     = [tex]\frac{64}{2}[/tex]

     = 32 units

Question:

Adler and Erika solved the same equation using the calculations below.

Adler’s Work

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = k + \frac{1}{2} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

Erika’s Work

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{13}{8}+ (-\frac{1}{2}) = k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}).[/tex]

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

Which statement is true about their work?

Answer:

Both Adler and Erika solved for k correctly because either the addition property of equality or the subtraction property of equality can be used to solve for k.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Required

What is true about Adler and Erika's workings

Analyzing Adler's work;

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Adler subtracted 1/2 from both sides

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = k + \frac{1}{2} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the left-hand side

[tex]\frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{13 - 4}{8} = \frac{9}{8}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the right-hand side

[tex]k + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = k[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

So, Adler's workings is correct

Analyzing Erika's work;

[tex]\frac{13}{8}= k + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Erika added -1/2 to both sides

[tex]\frac{13}{8}+ (-\frac{1}{2}) = k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}).[/tex]

Solving the expression on the left-hand side

[tex]\frac{13}{8} + (-\frac{1}{2}) = \frac{13}{8} - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{13 - 4}{8} = \frac{9}{8}[/tex]

Solving the expression on the right-hand side

[tex]k + \frac{1}{2} + (-\frac{1}{2}) =k + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = k[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]\frac{9}{8}= k[/tex]

So, Erika's workings is correct

Both workings are correct

Answer: Both Adler and Erika are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

On Edge 2021

Answer:

l= 28 feet

b = 2 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a rectangle is given by;

P= 2(l + b)

Comparing this to the equation; 8x + 4 = 60, i can write;

2(4x + 2) = 60

This means that;

l = 4x

b = 2

but x =7

So;

l = 4* 7 = 28 feet

b = 2 feet

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To circumscribe a circle to a given triangle implies constructing a circle outside the triangle, so that it touches the three vertices of the given triangle externally.

The step requires bisecting two sides of the triangle so as to locate the center of the circle. Then with the center and one of the edges, draw a complete circle. The circles should be outside the triangle and passing through its three vertices.

The construction is as shown in the attachment to this answer.

Answer:

3² = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

45 =  3² × 5

81  = 3⁴

================

HCF = 3²

Answer:

6.14

Step-by-step explanation:

Find area of shaded region:

regtangle area - circle area = shaded area

Regtangle area:

3x3=9

Circle area:

Pi (3.14) x radius x radius= 3.14

area all together if shaded region

9-3.14=6.14

Answer: 4 Ounces.

Step-by-step Explanation: I don't know the full context of the problem, but if Seth used 4 ounces, that means that he used 4 ounces all together.

Answer:

Ce clasă ești sa văd daca te pot ajuta

Answer:

-8, -8

Step-by-step explanation:

If you add the equations, you get -7x + 4x + 4y - 4y = 24. Canceling out the 4y and the -4y, and adding 4x to -7x, you get -3x = 24. Divide both sides by -3 and you get x = -8. Next, pick an equation and substitute x for -8. I am going to use the first equation. (-7)-8 + 4y = 24 is equal to 56 + 4y = 24. Subtract 56 from both sides to get 4y is equal to -32, and if you divide both sides by 4, you get y = -8.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (-8, -8)

Step-by-step explanation:

We notice that the coefficients of y are +4 and -4, so have a sum of zero. This means we can add the two equations to eliminate the y-terms.

  (-7x +4y) +(4x -4y) = (24) +(0)

  -3x = 24 . . . . . . . . . simplify

  x = -8 . . . . . . . . . . . divide both sides by -3

Now, we can find y using either equation.

  4(-8) -4y = 0

  -8 -y = 0 . . . . . . . . divide both sides by 4

  -8 = y . . . . . . . . . . add y to both sides

The solution to the system of equations is ...

  (x, y) = (-8, -8)

example 1: this is basically reducing WHILE multiplying. since 5 and 10 have a greatest common factor and is able to be reduced by each other, we do so. hence the reason 5 went to 1 and 10 went to 2 because 5 goes into 5 once and 5 goes into 10 twice. it was a different case for 3 and 8. 3 obviously cant go into 8 and 3 is prime so nothing can be done with those. ONLY REDUCE WHILE MULTIPLYING DIAGONALLY you CANNOT do up and down or side to side. so our new fractions are [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex] so multiply across and get [tex]\frac{3}{16}[/tex] which cant be reduced more.

example 2: this one in my opinion is pretty easy. you take the two fractions and multiply regularly across. you get [tex]\frac{27}{80}[/tex]. that fraction can be reduced. so we find the prime factorization of each number. 3 is a prime factor. 3x3x3=27 which is our top number. 2 and 5 are all prime numbers used to reach 80. 2x2x2x2x5=80. that's the prime factorization method its an easier way to check your work also.

example 3: this one is practically a combination of the two previous ones. [tex]\frac{16}{21}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{7}{8}[/tex] can be diagonally reduced on both diagonals. 7 goes into 7 once and 7 goes into 21 three times 8 goes into 8 once and 8 goes into 16 twice. now we have [tex]\frac{1}{1}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] multiply across and get just [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]. prime factorization is the best way to do this but, more effective with larger numbers. [tex]\frac{2*2*2*2*7}{3*7*2*2*2}[/tex] now cross out the numbers that are the same on the top and bottom. three 2's cancel out, one 7 cancels out, and now we're left with [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex].

I really hope this helps you!!

Answer:

See explanations below

Step-by-step explanation:

1)2 2/3 + 3 2/3

Convert to improper fraction

= 8/3 + 11/3

= (8+11)/3

= 19/3

= 6 1/3

hence the sum as mixed fraction is 6 1/3

2) 9 3/6 + 2 2/6

= 57/6 + 14/6

= (57+14)/6

= 71/6

= 11 5/6

Hence the value as a mixed fraction is 11 5/6

3) 4 3/8 + 1 5/8

= 35/8 + 13/8

= (35+13)/8

= 48/8

= 6

Hence the value is 6

Answer:

11 hours ago u prob dont need it

Step-by-step explanation:

123456