Please help I’ll mark brainliest :)

Answer:

B : 0.133 M

Explanation:

moles Li3N3 = 0.4 mol Li x (2 moles Li3N/6 moles Li) = 0.133 M

Answer:

This question is so confusing, I'm sorry

Answer:

Radium

Explanation:

It has the highest atomic number so it would have more shells, making it larger than the others.

Answer:

3.27 x 10⁻¹⁶ grams

Explanation:

moles Au = 1.00 x 10⁻⁶ Atoms / 6.02 x 10²³Atoms / mole = 1.66 x 10⁻¹⁸ mole Au

grams Au = 1.66 x 10⁻¹⁸ mole Au x 196.97 grams Au/mole Au

= 3.27 x 10⁻¹⁶ grams Au

Answer:

Longer bonds have lower attractive force

Answer:

Results from method B is more reliable than method A.

Explanation:

The two method that are used for the analysis produced different results. The first method that is method A  gives higher value of the iodine content than the method B.

When [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] was added to water, method A showed an increased in the iodine content and it increases with the increase in the amount of [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] .

Where as in the method B, there is no change in the results. Therefore the measurements provided by the method A shows an inference of [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] ion.

The measurement of the iodine content is affected by the presence of the ion [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] in water.

Since in method B there is no change in measurement, it is independent of the presence [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] ion in water.

As higher iodine content is given by method A, so [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex]  ion must be present in original water that must be interfering the measurement. Hence, method B is more reliable.

Method B is more reliable as its value is not altered by external factors such as contamination.

Water analysis is done to test the quality of water.

The method employed in water analysis is titrimetric analysis.

In the test iodide (I⁻) content of a commercial mineral water using the two methods, the results of the test showed different values for the iodide content.

However, since addition of Mn²⁺ to the mineral water increases the iodide content value from Method A while that of Method B remains unchanged, Method B is more reliable as its value is not altered by external factors such as contamination.

Learn more about titrimetric analysis at: https://brainly.com/question/8463543

Answer:

Answer choice 'C'

Explanation:

As the ball slows after kicking generates maximum Kinetic Energy, the ball slows due to its Kinetic Energy being transferred to surroundings because of atmospheric and surface friction until it stops in a state of static equilibrium.

Answer:

the mole ratio of chromium to nickel atoms in the steel is 2.383

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Chromium  = 19% ( by mass )

Nickel = 9% ( by mass )

now, let the mass of the steel = 100 g

so mass of Chromium  = 19g

mass of nickel = 9g

We know that; Atomic mass of Cr is 52 g/mol, Atomic mass of Ni is 58.7 g/mol

Moles of Cr =  mass/atomic number = 19/52 mol

Moles of Ni =  mass/atomic number = 9/58.7 mol

The mole ratio of of Cr to Ni atom  will be;

⇒ Moles of Cr / Moles of Ni

= (19/52) / (9/58.7)

= 19×58.7 / 9×52

= 2.383

Therefore, the mole ratio of chromium to nickel atoms in the steel is 2.383

Answer:

When an egg is fertilized, it divides into two components — one becomes the embryo, which develops into the fetus, and the other becomes the placenta, which grows along the lining of the uterus. The umbilical cord develops from embryonic tissue and will grow about 60 centimetres long.

The umbilical cord develops from and contains remnants of the yolk sac and allantois. It forms by the fifth week of development, replacing the yolk sac as the source of nutrients for the embryo.

OR put simply

A, the oyster cells of the blastocyst.

Answer:

Continental drift was a theory that explained how continents shift position on Earth's surface. Set forth in 1912 by Alfred Wegener, a geophysicist and meteorologist, continental drift also explained why look-alike animal and plant fossils, and similar rock formations, are found on different continents.

Explanation:

nun

Answer:

Continental drift or tectonic plates is a theory that explains the formation of the current surface structure of the Earth.

Continental drift is also understandable if you take pictures of each continents map and try to join them with another, for example, try to fit the map of western south India with Oman's southern region you will see they exactly fit each other, Science explains this as that the land had split and drifted to form what we see now, and this is known as continental drift or tectonic plates. This form was brought up by Alfred Wegener in 1912.

This theory is also the reasoning for the rising of mountains like the Himalayan mountains, which are having a rise in their height over time, the Himalayan mountains are believed to be belonging to a boundary of two plates that move towards each other and this is believed as the rise of India.

Answer:

The answer is "[tex]\bold{4.97 \times 10^{-2}}[/tex]"

Explanation:

Please find the complete question in the attached file.

Equation:

[tex]2SO_2+O_2 \leftrightharpoons 2SO_3[/tex]

at [tex]t=0 3.3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0.79[/tex]

at equilibrium [tex]3.3-p \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0.79 - \frac{P}{2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P[/tex]

[tex]p= 0.47 \ \ atm\\\\SO_2=3.3-0.47 = 2.83 \ \ atm\\\\O_2= 0.74 -\frac{0.47}{2}=0.74-0.235=0.555 \ atm\\\\K_P=\frac{[PSO_3]^2}{[PSO_2]^2[PO_2]}\\\\[/tex]

     [tex]=\frac{0.47^2}{2.83^2\times 0.555}\\\\=4.97 \times 10^{-2}[/tex]

Answer:

X axis shows the independent and Y axis shows the dependent.

Explanation:

Answer:

it's mixture

Explanation:

since pond is composed of not only microbes and also more aqatic animals so I think pond become mixture but not pure substance am I right or not...

Answer:

NaNH₂₀

Explanation:

0.5 mol Na, 0.5 mol N, and 10 mol H

To obtain the empirical formulae, we find the mole ratio between the elements and this is done by dividing all through by the smallest mol (0.5)

Na = 0.5 / 0.5 = 1

N = 0.5 / 0.5 = 1

H = 10 / 0.5 = 20

The mole ratio is used to write the empirical formulae. It is given as;

NaNH₂₀

Answer:

(1) Cl₂ is the limiting reactant.

(2) 8.18 g

Explanation:

First we convert the given masses of reactants into moles, using their respective molar masses:

0.070 moles of Cl₂ would react completely with (2 * 0.070) 0.14 moles of Na. There are more Na moles than that, so Na is the reactant in excess while Cl₂ is the limiting reactant.

Then we calculate how many moles of NaCl are formed, using the limiting reactant:

Finally we convert NaCl moles into grams:

Answer:

Explanation:

F=mg

F=35*9.81

F=343.35N

Answer:

Explanation:

decomposers

Answer:

the ratio of the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of alanine to the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of glucose is 1.0111

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

To determine the ratio of the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of alanine to the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of glucose, first we get the molar masses of both alanine and glucose

we know that;

Molar mass of alanine ( C₃H₇NO₂ ) = 89.09 g/mol

Molar mass of glucose ( C₆H₁₂O₆ ) = 180.16 g/mol

now, { metabolizing each gram }

moles of alanine = mass taken / molar mass

= 1g / 89.09 g/mol = 1/89.09 moles

moles of glucose = mass taken / molar mass

= 1g / 180.16 g/mol = 1/180.16 moles

In each molecule of alanine, we have 3 atoms  of carbon.

Also, in each molecules of glucose, we have 6 atoms of carbon

so,

number of moles of Carbons in alanine = 3 × 1/89.09 moles = 0.03367

number of moles of Carbons in glucose = 6 × 1/180.16 moles = 0.0333

so ratio of energy will be the ratio of carbon atoms, which is;

⇒ 0.03367 / 0.0333 = 1.0111

Therefore, the ratio of the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of alanine to the energy the body gets metabolizing each gram of glucose is 1.0111

Answer:

i hope u find what your looking for

Answer: (i) blue colour fades away

(ii) Single replacement

(iii) copper sulphate + iron [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] iron sulphate + copper

Explanation:

Single replacement reaction is a chemical reaction in which more reactive element displaces the less reactive element from its salt solution.

[tex]CuSO_4+Fe\rightarrow FeSO_4+Cu[/tex]

 Here iron being more reactive than copper can easily displace copper from its salt solution and form iron sulphate and copper in elemental form.

The blue colour of the copper sulphate solution fades away.

The word equation is :

copper sulphate + iron [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] iron sulphate + copper

Answer:

D

Explanation:

because both H's should be positive and O is supposed to be negative.

Answer:

D. A collapse can be symmetrical or lopsided.

Explanation:

I hope this helps

-Have a wonderful day

-Tell me if it is wrong :)

-ED Language Arts

-Questioning in A Black Hole Is NOT a Hole

-Assignment

Thank you

A collapse can be symmetrical or lopsided. Therefore, the correct option is option D among all the given options.

The event horizon of a black hole is an area of spacetime wherein gravity is so intense that nothing, not even light or even other electromagnetic waves, have the energy to cross it. According to general relativity theory, a compact enough mass can bend spacetime into a black hole.

The event horizon is the line beyond which there is no escape. Despite having a significant impact on the outcome and conditions of an object traversing it, general relativity states that it lacks any locally observable characteristics. A black hole behaves in many ways like a perfect black body since it does not reflect light. A collapse can be symmetrical or lopsided. This helps answer the question asked previously.

Therefore, the correct option is option D.

To know more about black hole, here:

https://brainly.com/question/16470114

#SPJ3

Your question is incomplete but most probably your full question was,

If the star was spinning before the collapse, then the black hole will spin, too. If the collapse is perfectly symmetric, a smooth black hole forms. On the other hand, even a slightly lopsided collapse leads to a lumpy black hole, with erratic gravitational effects. The gravity might be strong in some places and weak in others, and pull in different directions. However, a lumpy hole won't stay lumpy for long, because its own gravity will work to smooth it out. —A Black Hole Is NOT a Hole, Carolyn Cinami DeCristofano What information in the passage helps answer the question asked previously? Gravity smooths out even the lumpiest black hole. A symmetrical collapse forms a smooth hole. Erratic gravity pulls a black hole in different directions. A collapse can be symmetrical or lopsided.

Answer:

immiscible

Explanation: