PLEASE HELP ASAP

Prove that triangles PQR and RSQ are congruent.
Given:
PQ = RS, and ​

Answer:

x=-4

Step-by-step explanation:

When the slope is undefined, we have a vertical line

A vertical line is of the form

x=

We have a point ( -4,2) so the x coordinate is -4

x=-4

Answer:

( -4,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

prime numbers are those which can't be dividend for 2 and composites are the reverse of prime numbers so largest prime number <50 is 49 and smallest composite number >10 is 12 know we have got the numbers then by subtracting 12 from 49 we get 37

Answer:

37

Step-by-step explanation:

37

Answer:

6.33 × 10⁻³

Step-by-step explanation:

Scientific Notation: x.xx × 10ⁿ

We simply follow the base 10 decimal system to put anything in scientific notation. Since we are moving the decimal place 3 places to the right, we would have it as 10⁻³ multiplying our standard form.

Answer:

6.33 × 10[tex]^{-3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

** The negative three is supposed to be an exponent **

Answer:

A 12 mile ride in Taxi 1 costs $36.00, and in Taxi 2 it costs $34.20.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Charges of taxi 1 = $3.00 per mile

Charges of taxi 2 = $1.77 per kilometer

1 mile = 1.61 kilometers

To find:

Cost of a 12 miles ride for taxi 1 and taxi 2.

Solution:

Let us first convert the charges of each taxi to per mile.

Taxi 1 charges are already given in per mile.

Charges for 1 mile = $3

Charges for 12 miles = 3 [tex]\times[/tex] 12 = $36

Taxi 2 charges = 1.77 [tex]\times[/tex] 1.61 = $2.85 per mile

Charges for 12 miles = 2.85 [tex]\times[/tex] 12 = $34.20

Therefore, the answer is:

A 12 mile ride in Taxi 1 costs $36.00, and in Taxi 2 it costs $34.20.

Answer:

y = -54 + 60

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 6 and -9 to get -54         (6)(-9) = -54

then subtract -54 from 6 to get 60            6 - (-54) = 60

then put it in equation form as, b = 60, and x = -54

y = -54 + 60

plz mark brainliest

The equation of line passes through the points (-9, 6) will be;

⇒ y = 6x + 60

What is Equation of line?

The equation of line in point-slope form passing through the points

(x₁ , y₁) and (x₂, y₂) with slope m is defined as;

⇒ y - y₁ = m (x - x₁)

Where, m = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

Given that;

The point on the line is (-9, 6).

And, The slope = 6

Now,

Since, The equation of line passes through the point (-9, 6).

And, Slope of the line is,

m = 6

Thus, The equation of line with slope 6 is,

⇒ y - 6 = 6 (x - (-9))

⇒ y - 6 = 6 (x + 9)

⇒ y - 6 = 6x + 54

⇒ y = 6x + 54 + 6

⇒ y = 6x + 60

Therefore, The equation of line passes through the points (-9, 6) will be;

⇒ y = 6x + 60

Learn more about the equation of line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ2

the slope 2/5 is written in the formula rise/run. So u can use this method to determine which line has a slope of 2/5.

Answer:

Its the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

I used slope to solve it

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

xy + |-49/1|(-1)

x = 7

y = 8

Step 2: Simplify

xy + |-49|(-1)

xy + 49(-1)

xy - 49

Step 3: Substitute and Evaluate

7(8) - 49

56 - 49

7

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

xy + | -49/1| (-1)

Let x=7 and y = 8

7*8 +  | -49/1| (-1)

56 +  | -49/1| (-1)

The absolute value of -49 is 49

56  +49 (-1)

Multiply

56-49

7

Answer:

(0,-26)

Step-by-step explanation:

0 -26

17 -39

34 -52

51 -65

68 -78

Answer:The 3 mi is equivalent to 190080 in. Step-by-step explanation: As given. 1 mi = 5280 ft. 1 ft = 12 in. Now first convert 3mi into ft . 3mi = 3 × 5280. = 15840 ft.

Answer:

B. They are not parallel because their slopes are not equal.

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the slope of the line that runs through points (6, 3) and (-1, 5):

[tex] slope (m) = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1} = \frac{5 - 3}{-1 - 6} [/tex]

[tex] slope (m) = \frac{2}{-7} = -\frac{2}{7} [/tex]

Since the slope of the line that passes through points (6, 3) and (-1, 5) is not the same with line that has a slope of ¾, therefore, both lines cannot be parallel.

The answer is "B. They are not parallel because their slopes are not equal."

Answer:

is 1,2,3 the answer ? if not what is the answer cuz im doing the same question

Step-by-step explanation:

Rigid motions are, exclusively, rotations, reflections, and translations. If you can move one polygon onto the other by using only those motions, they are congruent. One pentagon can, for example, be translated onto another pentagon, making them congruent. If, after being translated, point A is on point F and B on G and C on H and D on I and E on J, the congruence statement is: [tex] ABCDE\cong FGHIJ.[/tex]

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

whatever how much the money is for one day on the object just multiply the money by the days it's rented out and add together the snowboard total and the boots total

Answer:

358

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

According to BODMAS (or DMAS), first we add and then subtract

if both operations are of add, we add it at the same time

Answer:

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Answer:

False. It's not in the descending order for variable x.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given polynomial is,

-15x⁵y + 13x²y⁴ - x⁸

'x' is a variable in the given polynomial.

Order or degree of term x⁸ = 8

Order of term -15x⁵y = 5

Order of term 13x²y⁴ = 2

Descending order for the variable x will be,

8 > 5 > 2

So the descending order for the variable 'x' will be,

-x⁸ - 15x⁴y + 13x²y⁴

Therefore, Option (1) False is the correct option.

Answer:

-1-7 = -8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Question 1  

The test statistics is  [tex]t = 0.44[/tex]

The decision rule is

 Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion

There is no  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Question 2

The degree of freedom is  [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

The decision rule is

Reject the null hypothesis  

The conclusion

There is  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Explanation:

Considering Question 1

Here we are told to provide the test statistics

From the question we are told that

  The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 31[/tex]

  The second  sample size is  [tex]n_ 2 =  46[/tex]

   The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 525 \ minutes[/tex]

    The first standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_1 =  47.7[/tex]

    The second sample mean is  [tex]\= x_2 = 520 \ minutes[/tex]

   The second standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  48.2[/tex]

The null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = n_1 + n_2  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 31 + 46  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 75 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

 [tex]t =  \frac{(\= x_1 - \= x_2 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t =  \frac{( 525-  520 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{47.7^2}{31} + \frac{48.2^2}{46} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t = 0.44[/tex]

Let assume that the level of confidence is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the probability of t at a degree of freedom of  is  [tex]df = 75[/tex]

    [tex]P(t > 0.44 ) = 0.33060124 [/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

   [tex]p-value  =  2 *  P(t > 2.398)[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =   2 * 0.33060124[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =  0.66120[/tex]      

From the value obtain we see that [tex]p-value  >  \alpha[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is that there is no  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Considering Question 2

Here we are told to provide the degree of freedom

From the question we are told

    The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 39[/tex]

     The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 582 \ minutes[/tex]

     The first standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  63.8[/tex]

     The second sample size is  [tex]n_ 2 =  55[/tex]

     The second sample mean is  [tex]\= x_2 = 542 \ minutes[/tex]

     The second standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma_2 =  97.8 [/tex]

The null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = n_1 + n_2  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 39 + 55  -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

 [tex]t =  \frac{(\= x_1 - \= x_2 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t =  \frac{( 582 -  542 )-0}{ \sqrt{\frac{63.8^2}{39} + \frac{97.8^2}{55} } }[/tex]      

=>  [tex]t = 2.398[/tex]

Let assume that the level of confidence is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the probability of t at a degree of freedom of  is  [tex]df = 92 [/tex]

    [tex]P(t > 2.398 ) = 0.00925214[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

   [tex]p-value  =  2 *  P(t > 2.398)[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =   2 * 0.00925214[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  =  0.0185[/tex]      

From the value obtain we see that [tex]p-value  <  \alpha[/tex] hence we reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is that there is  sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference in the average time to complete the installation of the solar panels

Answer: The sum of the angles of a triangle on a sphere is 180°(1 + 4f), where f is the fraction of the sphere's surface that is enclosed by the triangle. For any positive value of f, this exceeds 180°.

Answer:

represents the one value

Step-by-step explanation:

Ones place

Answer:

Rounded to the nearest hundred, Ms. Sanshes had about 200 more tokens than Mr. Brown

Step-by-step explanation:

567=600 (rounded)

432=400 (rounded)

600-400=200 tokens

Answer:

143.6

Step-by-step explanation: i swear its right

Answer:

A) 8 feet.

B) 72 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the function [tex]f(x)=-16x^2+64x+8[/tex] which gives the height of the rocket (in feet) as a function of the rocket's horizontal distance.

Part A)

We want to find the initial height of the rocket when it was shot.

At the initial height, the rocket has not moved anywhere. So, the horizontal distance will be 0.

Therefore, to find the initial height, we will substitute 0 into our function. This yields:

[tex]f(0)=-16(0)^2+64(0)+8[/tex]

Evaluate:

[tex]f(0)=8[/tex]

Therefore, the initial height was 8 feet.

Part B)

Notice that our function is a quadratic.

Therefore, the maximum height will be given by the vertex of our quadratic.

To find the vertex, we use:

[tex](-\frac{b}{2a},f(-\frac{b}{2a}))[/tex]

Let's label our coefficients. We have [tex]-16x^2+64x+8[/tex]

Therefore, a=-16, b=64, and c=8.

Substitute them into the vertex formula to find the x-coordinate:

[tex]x=-\frac{64}{2(-16)}\\\Rightarrow x=64/32=2[/tex]

Now, to find the maximum height, substitute 2 back into our function f(x):

[tex]f(2)=-16(2)^2+64(2)+8[/tex]

Evaluate:

[tex]f(2)=-16(4)+64(2)+8\\\Rightarrow f(2)=-64+128+8\\\Rightarrow f(2)=72\text{ feet}[/tex]

Therefore, the rocket reaches a maximum height of 72 feet.