One major reason for the law of demand is that people substitute relative lower-price goods for relative higher-priced goods . Option (C).
The law of demand is a fundamental principle in microeconomics that states that there is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded. In other words, "if all else is equal, as the price of a good rises , quantity demanded falls ; conversely, as the price of a good falls , quantity demanded rises ".
"When we say that a person's demand for anything increases, we mean that he will buy more of it than he would before at the same price, and that he will buy as much of it as before at a higher price," Alfred Marshall explained.
Learn more about law of demand
https://brainly.com/question/10782448
#SPJ4
Internal stakeholders include the owners, board of directors, customers, suppliers, distributors, and the community.True/False
The given statement is true.
Internal stakeholders are those who have a direct interest in a firm, such as through employment, administration, or investment. Various agencies are those who don't work for a company directly but are still impacted by its decisions and results.
People that have a "stake" in a situation are stakeholders by definition. In terms of an organization, stakeholders can be divided into those who may be "internal" (such as employees and management) and those who may be "external"
Internal Stakeholders: They have voting rights and are a part of the company's management. They are both significant shareholders in the business and members of its board of executives. As a result, they possess all the authority enjoyed by other higher-level management.
Learn more about internal stakeholders here:
https://brainly.com/question/4414143
#SPJ4
When a state exercises jurisdiction over property?
This kind of jurisdiction is referred to as in rem when it pertains to property located within the state.
Although it may seem unfair, it is quite legal for a court to use its authority over someone's property to compel them to participate in a dispute. A court may exercise one of two types of jurisdiction over, or control over, property. When the court lacks in personam, or personal jurisdiction, it has the authority to manage property through in rem jurisdiction. Similar to in rem jurisdiction, quasi in rem jurisdiction enables courts to take custody of a party's assets in order to compel their appearance in court. In any situation, a court may seize personal property to support a legal claim under either type of property jurisdiction.
To know more about jurisdiction:
https://brainly.com/question/9917253
#SPJ4
the police officer who have the greatest amount of discretion are
Explanation:
The police officers who have the greatest amount of discretion are typically patrol officers, as they are often the first responder to calls for service and make decisions on the spot in the field. However, the level of discretion also varies depending on the specific jurisdiction, department policies, and individual circumstances. Higher-ranking officers, such as sergeants or detectives, may also have significant discretion in certain situations, while specialized units such as SWAT or internal affairs may have unique levels of discretion.
A greater grasp of the complexity of police work, an investigation into the use of discretion in officers' daily policing actions, and a clearer.
appreciation of the crucial role that community leaders play in the health of communities have all emerged over the past two decades. Famous criminologist George L. Kelling has worked as a practical police officer since the 1970s, collaborating on a daily basis with officers in various agencies across the nation and acting as an advisor to both large and small communities that are trying to find better ways to incorporate police work into the lives of their residents. This Research Report explains how an officer's delicate duty fits into the "broken windows" metaphor, which was put forth by James Q. Wilson and Dr. Kelling in 1982 in The Atlantic Monthly. The role of the police organization in maintaining public safety and preventing crime goes much beyond merely apprehending criminals. Police have historically exercised their authority in a variety of ways, frequently without making any arrests. Dr. Kelling is particularly interested in the application of judgment in the execution of the fundamental police power, the enforcement of the law.
Learn more about police here :
https://brainly.com/question/28198724
#SPJ4
only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal of the case to a higher court. true or false
A high court may hear an appeal in a civil matter from either party. Thus, the given statement is false.
Most states limit the power to appeal in criminal cases to the defendant alone. (In some places, the prosecution has a very limited power to appeal to clarify certain legal issues. Prior to the start of the trial itself, these appeals frequently take place.
The plaintiff or petitioner and the defendant or respondent are the usual names for the parties at the trial level. Appellant and appellee are the names of the parties in an appeal.
Within 60 days of the date the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal was communicated, any party who feels wronged by a decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal may initiate an appeal with the High Court.
For more information on high court kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/29546812
#SPJ4
which policies should jack keep? which should he cancel? what policies should he add?
Jack, as a college student, should have policies in place to help him stay on track with his goals and maintain a balanced life. However, it is also important to review and adjust policies as necessary to align with his changing needs and circumstances.
Policies are an important aspect of any organization or individual's decision-making process. They serve as a guide for actions and decision-making, ensuring consistency and stability in the long term.
In terms of policies Jack should keep, he should maintain any policies that have helped him achieve his goals, maintain a healthy work-life balance, and prioritize his well-being. For example, if he has a policy of studying for a certain amount of time each day, this is a policy that should be kept in place.
There may be some policies Jack should cancel, such as ones that are no longer relevant or are hindering his progress. For example, if Jack has a policy of not socializing during the week, but this policy is preventing him from forming meaningful relationships, this policy should be cancelled.
Lastly, Jack should consider adding policies that align with his current goals and aspirations. For example, if he wants to improve his physical health, he may want to add a policy of going to the gym three times a week. Additionally, if he wants to improve his financial situation, he may want to add a policy of setting aside a certain amount of money each month for savings.
To learn more about policies here:
https://brainly.com/question/3006046#
#SPJ11
What are some factors to consider when developing a problem statement? Select all that apply.
Question 10 options:
The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about.
It should be exactly like the research question.
It should be feasible.
It should be viable.
Problem statements frequently contain three components: The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about. It should be exactly like the research question. It should be feasible.
What is problem statement?A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement.
The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.
Learn more about Problem statements
https://brainly.com/question/11657822
#SPJ4
Problem statements frequently contain three components:
The problem is a desirable one to correct or learn more about. It should be exactly like the research question. It should be feasible.What is problem statement?A problem statement is a brief description of a problem that needs to be solved or of a situation that needs to be improved. It points out the discrepancy between the desired (goal) state and the current (problem) state of a process or product. The problem statement should be created with an emphasis on the facts and should cover the Five Ws. Understanding a problem is a prerequisite for solving it, and this can be accomplished by using a problem statement.
The majority of businesses and organisations frequently use problem statements when carrying out process improvement initiatives. The project team will use a straightforward and well-defined problem statement to clarify the issue and work towards developing a solution.
Learn more about Problem statements
brainly.com/question/11657822
#SPJ4
the concept of popular sovereignty is compatible with which form of government?
It can be said that the concept of popular sovereignty is compatible with democracy as a form of government.
The democracy can be usually interpreted as the form of governance wherein the participation of public in the establishment of government is generally the highest. The concept of popular sovereignty is the most compatible with such governance because of the involvement of the public. The democratic societies typically express a lot of public freedom and constituency, which is the most apt situation in these cases.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
any court can exercise jurisdiction over any person. (T/F)
This statement is False: any court can exercise jurisdiction over any person.
Any court may have jurisdiction over any property, regardless of where it is. A court can exercise jurisdiction over some nonresident defendants in accordance with a state long-arm statute. If a corporation conducts enough substantial business to be considered "at home" in a state, the minimum-contacts threshold is satisfied.
The ability of a court to rule on the party being sued in a case is referred to as personal jurisdiction. The U.S. Constitution stipulates that a party must have a minimum amount of contact with the forum in which the court is located before the court may exercise its authority over that party. Washington v. International Shoe, 326 US 310 (1945). As a result, if a defendant is sued by a plaintiff, the defendant may object to the lawsuit by claiming that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
To know more about court :
https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
Haan i miing hi normal equipment but need to tranport a bullet from the crime. In an attempt to protect the bullet, which proce would be BEST to ue?
fold it in a clean piece of paper
put it in a pocket
wrap it in a towel
wrap it in platic wrap
Answer:
Wrap it in plastic wrap.
which of the following is not an investigative responsibility of the fbi?
The FBI has several investigative responsibilities, but not all responsibilities fall under its jurisdiction. One responsibility that is not under the jurisdiction of the FBI is the investigation of state and local crimes.
The FBI is a federal law enforcement agency and has the primary responsibility for investigating federal crimes, such as bank robbery, kidnapping, and terrorism. It also has the authority to assist state and local law enforcement agencies in certain cases. However, the FBI does not have the jurisdiction to investigate state and local crimes, which are typically handled by state and local law enforcement agencies.
The FBI also has a responsibility for protecting the United States from foreign intelligence operations and espionage, as well as protecting the country from cyber-based attacks and high-technology crimes. Additionally, the FBI is responsible for providing assistance to other law enforcement agencies, conducting criminal and national security investigations, and working to prevent terrorism and protect the United States from terrorist attacks.
In conclusion, while the FBI has a wide range of investigative responsibilities, the investigation of state and local crimes is not one of them. This responsibility falls under the jurisdiction of state and local law enforcement agencies.
Learn more about espionage :
https://brainly.com/question/14369576
#SPJ4
your driver license will be suspended if you are convicted of attempting to elude a police officer. true or false
It is true that if you are convicted of attempting to elude a police officer your driver license will be suspended.In most of the states it's illegal to elude a police officer.
This means that if you are condemned of trying to escape from a police officer during a pursuit, your automobilist's license may be temporarily taken down. The length of the suspension depends on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.
It's a serious consequence that can have a significant impact on your capability to drive. So, it's true that your automobilist's license can be suspended if you are condemned of trying to elude a police officer.
To learn more about Attempt to elude police:
https://brainly.com/question/28580947
#SPJ4
8. The most famous and beloved president has been rushed to the hospital, grievously wounded by an assassin's bullet. He needs an immediate kidney and heart transplant to survive. No suitable donors are available, but there is a homeless person in the emergency room that is being kept alive on a respirator, who probably has only a few days to live, and who is a perfect donor. Without the transplant, the president will die; the homeless person will die in a few days anyway. Security at the hospital is very well controlled. The transplant team could accelerate the death of the homeless person and carry out the transplant without the public ever knowing that they killed the homeless person for his organs. Judge the action of the transplant team from the angle of ultilatranism, deontology, virtue and right approach.
The right approach to this dilemma would depend on the individual values and beliefs of the transplant team and the people involved.
What is Utilitarianism?Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that holds that an action is right if it leads to the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. In this case, the transplant team could argue that by performing the transplant they would save the life of the president, which would bring happiness to many people, including the president's family, friends, and supporters, as well as the country as a whole.
Deontology: Deontology is an ethical theory that holds that an action is right if it is in accordance with a moral duty or rule, regardless of its consequences. From a deontological perspective, it would be wrong for the transplant team to kill the homeless person, even if doing so would save the president, because it violates the moral rule against taking innocent life.
Virtue Ethics: Virtue ethics is an ethical theory that holds that an action is right if it is in line with the virtues and moral character of the actor. In this case, the transplant team would need to consider whether killing the homeless person to save the president is in line with their own personal values and virtues. If they believe that taking innocent life is wrong, then it would be difficult for them to justify the action from a virtue ethics perspective.
Learn more about Utilitarianism at:
https://brainly.com/question/29557569
#SPJ1
All of the following influenced the Framers in developing the Constitution EXCEPT
a. State constitutions
b. John Locke's Two Treaties of Government
c. Virginia's royal charter
d. British tradition
C) All of the following influenced the Framers in developing the Constitution EXCEPT Virginia's royal charter
Un order to declare the inalienable rights of men, including the right to change or get rid of "inadequate" government, the Virginia Declaration of Rights was written in 1776. [2] It had an impact on several following works, such as the United States Bill of Rights and the United States Declaration of Independence (1776). (1789).
On June 12, 1776, the Fifth Virginia Convention in Williamsburg, Virginia, unanimously approved the Declaration as a stand-alone document from the Virginia Constitution, which was later approved on June 29. [4] The Virginia Declaration of Rights asserted that it was "the source and foundation of governance" in Virginia even before the Declaration of Rights was adopted into Article I of the Virginia State Constitution in 1830. [5] The Virginia Constitution still contains a slightly revised version, making it legally binding today.
To know more about Virginia:
https://brainly.com/question/12925682
#SPJ4
A. Africans' unified resistance to European intervention
B. Europeans' desire to develop industry in Africa
C. Europeans' use of both warfare and diplomacy
D. Africans' widespread acceptance of European laws
By using avoidance strategies, Africans were able to avoid colonial military and administrative injustices. Africans left their homes or concealed themselves when they heard approaching colonial armies, tax collectors, or labor recruiters in order to avoid violent encounters and eviction.
Africans fought European conquerors because they were afraid of them. Africans' intricate interpersonal relationships had an impact on the way they rebelled against the colonial power. They faced both European and African armies during their resistance to the European invasions. Due to the advanced military equipment that European colonists brought with them and which African forces were unable to match, African resistance to European imperialism fell short. Military opposition in Africa during the early stages of formal colonialism may occasionally be successful, although this was uncommon.
Learn more about it colonial here:-
https://brainly.com/question/28724126
#SPJ4
a body turns up on the shore—who is it and what do the police think happened?
The body found on the shore belonged to a young woman who had gone missing several days prior.
The police initially suspected foul play, as there were signs of struggle at the scene, but eventually determined that the woman had died as a result of a tragic accident.
After further investigation, the police discovered that the woman had gone swimming near the shore late at night and had been caught in strong currents. The police theorized that the woman had become exhausted while trying to swim against the current, eventually leading to her drowning.
They also concluded that the woman had likely become disoriented in the darkness and had been unable to make it back to shore. The police ruled out foul play due to the lack of evidence discovered at the scene.
To know more about lack of evidence click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29912810#
#SPJ11
Answer:
Henry Clerval's body washes up on shore, police believe it was Victor Frankenstein (The creator) because he was with Henry the night before.
Explanation:
I read the book and answered it on my review.
Deciding what issues will be decided and what problem will be addressed by government is part of the ________ process.
a. policy legitimization
b. policy evaluation
c. agenda setting
d. policy implementation
The process of deciding what issues will be decided and what problems will be addressed by government is known as agenda setting.
correct answer is c. agenda setting.
Agenda setting is a process of prioritizing certain issues and problems that need to be addressed and deciding on the order in which they should be tackled. This process helps to ensure that the most important issues and problems are addressed first, and that resources are allocated to the most pressing issues.
Once the agenda is set, the government can then decide how to implement the necessary policies to address the issues and problems that have been prioritized. Agenda setting is an important part of policy making as it helps to ensure that the government is focusing on the most important issues and allocating resources where they are needed most.
know more about agenda here
https://brainly.com/question/16926214#
#SPJ11
Which event dramatically changed how much power the king would hold?
List of Cons of Insanity Defense?
List of Cons of Insanity Defense
It is abolished in some jurisdictions. Take note that insanity defense is not accepted at all jurisdictions in all courts. ...
It can lead to increased trial costs. ...
It can be very difficult to prove.
The mental disorder defense, also referred to as the insanity defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case that contends the defendant is not accountable for their actions because they were suffering from an episodic psychiatric illness at the time of the criminal act.
This is in contrast to an excuse of provocation, where the defendant is still accountable but the accountability is mitigated by a passing mental state. [1]: 613 A civil ruling in trusts and estates that declares a will invalid because it was created when a testator's mental disorder prevented him or her from recognizing the natural objects is contrasted with a decision that a defendant in a criminal case cannot stand trial because a mental illness prevents them from effectively assisting counsel.
To know more about Defence here
https://brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4
patrol officers, often the lowest-paid members of an agency with the least amount of authority, have the greatest amount of discretionary power.
Answer:
This statement is true. Patrol officers, as the front-line law enforcement personnel, have a large amount of discretion in how they respond to calls and incidents. They often make decisions on the spot, such as determining whether to make an arrest, issue a warning, or take no action. This discretion, combined with the fact that they have direct contact with the public, gives them significant power and influence in the enforcement of laws and the administration of justice.
Yes, patrol officers, often the lowest-paid members of an agency with the least amount of authority, have a significant amount of discretionary power.
Patrol officers are the first point of contact between the police and the public and they are often given significant discretion in how they handle incidents and interactions with the community. They are responsible for responding to calls for service, conducting investigations, making arrests, and enforcing the law. Despite their relatively low rank and pay within a police agency, patrol officers have a significant amount of discretion in how they handle situations, as they are often making decisions in real-time, without the direct supervision of a superior officer. This discretion can include the use of force, making arrests, issuing citations, and determining the appropriate course of action in a given situation.
In conclusion, patrol officers, who are often the lowest-paid members of a police agency with the least amount of authority, have a significant amount of discretionary power in how they handle incidents and interactions with the community. Their decisions and actions can have a significant impact on individuals and the community, making it important for agencies to provide proper training and oversight.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/30088290
#SPJ4
constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizens, opinions, and propertyagainst arbitrary government interference are known as:
These guarantees are known as civil rightsare protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights.
Civil rights are protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as freedom of speech and assembly, protection against discrimination, and the right to due process. They are designed to prevent government interference with fundamental rights and freedoms, especially those that are essential to a democratic society. Civil rights also provide a platform for citizens to express their opinions without fear of retribution or censorship, and to enjoy the same privileges regardless of their personal characteristics. Civil rights are essential for a democratic society to function, as they ensure that all citizens are treated equally and enjoy their inalienable rights.
Learn more about civil rights. here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
TRUE or FALSE. moore's law has impacted the camera industry such that the firms that sell the most cameras aren't camera companies, but phone manufacturers.
True, Moore's law has impacted the camera industry such that the firms that sell the most cameras aren't camera companies, but phone manufacturers.
A type of nonvolatile memory is random access memory. Because of Moore's Law, phone makers rather than camera companies are the businesses who sell the most cameras in the market.
According to Metcalfe's law, a telecommunications network's worth is proportional to the square of the number of users who are connected to the system (n2). Metcalfe's law was initially proposed in this form by George Gilder in 1993 and credited to Robert Metcalfe in relation to Ethernet.
To learn more about telecommunications click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1622085
#SPJ4
why did president theodore roosevelt feel that building the panama canal had become a military necessity for the united states?
The President Theodore Roosevelt felt that the building of the Panama Canal was a necessity for the United States to establish an expansion of American trade with the other parts of the world.
The former American President Theodore Roosevelt felt that there was a strong need to create a high strength navy in the United States. In an attempt to create a centralized control of military in the United States, he also stated that it became a necessity to build the Panama Canal, as it would also help in developing American trade by connecting it with other parts of the world.
Learn more about Roosevelt here:
https://brainly.com/question/29690956
#SPJ4
is widely referred to as ""the father of criminology.""
Critical Analysis Lombroso rose to prominence as the founder of contemporary criminology.
Lombroso was one of the pioneers in the scientific study of crime and offenders, and his thesis of the born criminal dominated discussions of criminal behavior in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The positivist criminology movement in Italy was started by Cesare Lombroso, who believed that physical characteristics and flaws could be used to identify criminal minds. Lombroso earned the title of "the father of contemporary criminology" as a result. Lombroso's thesis of the born criminal dominated thinking about criminal behavior in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Lombroso was one of the first to realize that crime and criminals might be examined scientifically. The study of crime and abnormal behavior is known as criminology (from the Latin crimen, "accusation," and the Ancient Greek -o, -logia, from logos meaning: "speech, reason"). [Reference needed] In both the behavioral and social sciences, criminology is an interdisciplinary field that largely draws on the work of sociologists, political scientists, economists, psychologists, philosophers, psychiatrists, social workers, biologists, social anthropologists, and legal scholars.
Learn more about criminology here :
https://brainly.com/question/14829171
#SPJ4
A. producer's apparent authority
B. written contract
C. Law of Agency
D. Principal Capacity
When a principal's authority isn't explicitly or implicitly provided, but rather appears to have been given, an agent has the ability to act on that principal's behalf.
Only if a third party can fairly conclude that the principal granted the agent such power based on the principal's actions does this power come into existence. When an officer of a firm receives a title, status, and benefits that lead to a misrepresentation about the extent of that officer's actual authority without safeguards in place, that is a common example of a problem concerning seeming authority. Without the principal's permission or understanding, this is authority. It only happens because of what is believed to be a representation the principal made to the TP to the following effect.
For more details about authority. it, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28459817
#SPJ4
the law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum of an isolated system. true or false
True. Yes it's is true that the law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum of an isolated system.
The law of conservation of energy expresses that in a secluded framework (a framework with no outer powers following up on it), the complete force of the framework stays steady. This intends that assuming at least two items impact or communicate with one another, their complete force before the association should be equivalent to their absolute energy after the cooperation.
The law of protection of force is an essential standard in physical science and is broadly utilized in many fields, like mechanics, thermodynamics, and astronomy. The law of conservation of energy is a result of the translational balance of the laws of material science without any outer powers. It gives a helpful instrument to dissecting and grasping the elements of actual frameworks.
To learn more about conservation of momentum, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/30468687
#SPJ4
After a New York state court trial in which Bernie appears and vigorously defends himself, the New York state court awards Donald $1.5M dollars in damages for his tort claim. In trying to collect from Bernie in Vermont, Donald must have the Vermont court certify the New York judgment. Why, ordinarily, must the Vermont court do so?
The Vermont court must certify the New York ruling to make it valid in Vermont. Bernie would not have to pay damages if the New York decision is not certified in Vermont. The Vermont court certifies the ruling, making Bernie legally compelled to pay $1.5M in damages.
Why, ordinarily, must the Vermont court do so?Generally, The Vermont court must certify the New York judgment in order to give it legal force and effect in the state of Vermont.
Without certification, the New York judgment is not legally binding in Vermont and Bernie would not be required to pay the damages.
By certifying the judgment, the Vermont court is recognizing the judgment as valid and enforceable in the state of Vermont, making Bernie legally obligated to pay the $1.5M dollars in damages.
Read more about court
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a legal entity created for the sole purpose of providing affordable group health coverage to its participants?
a. Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangment (MEWA)
b. Multiple Trust Arrangement (MTA)
c. Multiple Purchasing Groups (MPG)
d. Fraternal Benefit Society
The Correct answer (c) Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangement (MEWA).
The Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangement (MEWA) is a procedure in which multiple employers collaborate with a specific association to provide health and welfare benefits to their employees. MEWA serves as the foundation for group healthcare coverage provided by association health plans. MEWA is essentially a unified health plan for multiple employers who negotiate health plans as a single entity.
The multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) is a unified system that provides health and welfare benefits to employers and their employees. MEWA is also known as the "multiple employer trust (MET)." Employers contribute to the plan based on the number of employees they have.
Learn more about Welfare
https://brainly.com/question/16596304
#SPJ4
2
Contracts and Legal Documents: Mastery Test
Drag each tile to the correct location on the image. Not all tiles will be used.
Match each statement with the correct element of a contract.
m All rights reserved
We would like to rent 50 acres of
land to plant wheat, and we will
pay 40 percent of the costs.
This work of art is available for sale
to the highest bidder.
Offer
We have understood the proposal
and promise to deliver 20 boxes
of paper.
I have read the contract, and I will
abide by all the terms.
Acceptance
Submit Test
Tools
Match each statement with the correct element of a contract.
This work of art is available for sale to the highest bidder - All rights reserved
We have understood the proposal and promise to deliver 20 boxes of paper. - offer
I have read the contract, and I will abide by all the terms - Acceptance
What is a Contract?A contract is referred to as an agreement that is enforceable by law based on the consent of both the parties involved in the deal fulfilling all the elements of a valid contract.
A contract is created when a proposal is given by one party to another. when this offer is accepted by the particular party in exchange for something that abides by the law.
Learn more about Contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
does cost-benefit anaylsis such as the ford pinto case invalidate the utilitarian argument
Cost-benefit analysis is a popular economic tool used to determine the economic feasibility of a project or policy by weighing the costs and benefits of an investment or decision.
One well-known example of cost-benefit analysis is the Ford Pinto case, where the company made a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was worth investing in a costly design change that would prevent the car from bursting into flames in a rear-end collision.
However, the Ford Pinto case raises questions about the ethics of cost-benefit analysis and its validity as a decision-making tool. Utilitarianism, as a moral philosophy, argues that actions should be based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
The Ford Pinto case highlights a potential flaw in cost-benefit analysis as it seems to prioritize monetary considerations over the well-being of individuals and society.
To read more about cost-benefit analysis, Visit- https://brainly.com/question/14556838
#SPJ11
courts require the breach in intentional torts to be
Explanation:
intentional or reckless, not just merely careless.
To establish an intentional tort, you must show the defendant intended to commit a hurtful act, such as battery or defamation.
You must establish that the defendant intentionally committed a detrimental act that caused you harm and that you experienced losses for which compensation is available. A claim of negligence is founded on the idea that the defendant violated a duty of care given to the plaintiff and that violation led to the plaintiff's injuries in a personal injury or wrongful death case. The tortfeasor is the person who committed the wrongdoing. A tortfeasor is held liable for their actions, and as a result, must make up for the harm they caused to the victim. Despite the similarities between tort law and contract law, a violation of contract not a crime. There is no contract between the parties in a tort case. There is merely a legal obligation to exercise care that is imposed by the law, not the parties. A plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant had a legal obligation to the plaintiff, which the defendant willfully breached, causing the plaintiff harm or loss, in order to establish that the defendant committed an intentional tort. Trespassing, assaulting, and battery are a few examples of deliberate torts.
Learn more about intentional here :
https://brainly.com/question/15060272
#SPJ4