Answer:
Option A
The number of firms leaving the industry increases.
Hope this helps you. Do mark me as brainliest.
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
Answer:
B
Explanation:
what long-term effects did social isolation have on the rhesus monkeys in the Harlows' experiments?
what do hot and cold water have in common
Answer:
This is a pretty broad question. So broad that it makes me think you may have put this under the wrong subject?
Assuming this isn't a question based off of a larger lesson within your classes, there are many similarities between cold water and hot water.
For instance: They're...both water. They are both H2O. They are clear liquids with no color. They are wet (or not wet. Whatever side of that viral argument you're on). They can both be used to cook or hydrate something. Both are digestible. They're the same thing but at different temperatures. They conform to the shape of their container, etc. etc. etc.
Hot water is a result of something heating up the temperature, making the atoms go fast. Cold water is...cold.
— I hope this ramble helps in any way. Brainliest is SUPER appreciated. Have a great day!!
ANS FAST Predict any new development in the field of transport in India. WHO WILL GIVE THE WRITE ANS I WILL MARK HIM AS BRAINLIEST
Answer:
Passenger Mobility Enhancement
Explanation:
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MORTH) Government of India Invites Expressions of Interest (E0I) from eligible firms for providing Consulting services to undertake a `Passenger Mobility Enhancement (PME)' Study No.7980-IN Reference No. WB TA - 27 for MORTH.
LEVEL 1
B C D
A
3
2
4
control chart is a option choice
What aspect of the Magna Carta did the founding fathers wish to incorporate into the Constitution?
A. limiting governmental powers over individuals
and states and ensuring some individual rights
B. maximizing central authority
C. decentralizing individual rights and creating a
dictatorship
Answer:
Explanation:
The Magna Carta, meaning “Great Charter,” is one of the most influential political documents ever written: it is seen by many modern political scientists as the fundamental document for many of the governing laws of the west, including the United States. Originally issued in 1215 by King John of England as a way of dealing with his own political crisis, the Magna Carta was the first governmental decree establishing the principle that all people—including the king—were equally subject to the law.
Key Document in U.S. Political Foundations
In particular, the Magna Carta had a significant impact on the American Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the constitutions of various U.S. states. Its influence is also reflected in the beliefs held by eighteenth-century Americans that the Magna Carta affirmed their rights against oppressive rulers. In keeping with colonial Americans' general distrust of sovereign authority, most early state constitutions included declarations of rights retained by individual citizens and lists of protections of those citizens from the powers of the state government. Due in part to this conviction to individual liberty first embodied in the Magna Carta, the newly-formed United States also adopted the Bill of Rights.
The American Bill of Rights
Several of the natural rights and legal protections enumerated in both the state declarations of rights and the United States Bill of Rights descend from rights protected by Magna Carta. A few of these include:
Freedom from unlawful searches and seizures
The right to a speedy trial
A right to a jury trial in both criminal and civil cases
Protection from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
The exact phrase from the 1215 Magna Carta referring to “due process of law” is in Latin, but there are various translations. The British Library translation reads: “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.”
In addition, many broader constitutional principles and doctrines have their roots in America’s eighteenth-century interpretation of the Magna Carta, such as the theory of representative government, the idea of a supreme law, a government based on a clear separation of powers, and the doctrine of judicial review of legislative and executive acts.
Journal of the Continental Congress
Evidence of the influence of the Magna Carta on the American system of government can be found in several key documents, including the Journal of the Continental Congress, which is the official record kept of the Congress's deliberations between May 10, 1775, and March 2, 1789. In September and October 1774, the delegates to the first Continental Congress drafted a Declaration of Rights and Grievances, in which the colonists demanded the same liberties guaranteed to them under “the principles of the English constitution, and the several charters or compacts.”
They demanded self-government, freedom from taxation without representation, the right to a trial by a jury of their own countrymen, and their enjoyment of “life, liberty, and property” free from interference from the English crown.
The Federalist Papers
Written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, and published anonymously between October 1787 and May 1788, the Federalist Papers were a series of eighty-five articles intended to build support for the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. Despite the widespread adoption of declarations of individual rights in state constitutions, several members of the Constitutional Convention generally opposed adding a bill of rights to the federal Constitution.
In Federalist No. 84, published during the summer of 1788, Hamilton argued against the inclusion of a bill of rights, stating: “Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything they have no need of particular reservations.” In the end, however, the Anti-Federalists prevailed and the Bill of Rights—based largely on the Magna Carta—was appended to the Constitution in order to secure its final ratification by the states.
The Bill of Rights as Proposed
As originally proposed to Congress in 1791, there were twelve amendments to the constitution. These were strongly influenced by the state of Virginia’s Declaration of Rights of 1776, which in turn incorporated a number of the protections of the Magna Carta.
As a ratified document, the Bill of Rights included five articles directly reflecting these protections: Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures (4th),
Protection of rights to life, liberty, and property (5th),
Rights of accused persons in criminal cases (6th),
Rights in civil cases (7th), and
Other rights kept by the people (8th).
Answer: The Magna Carta, meaning “Great Charter,” is one of the most influential political documents ever written: it is seen by many modern political scientists as the fundamental document for many of the governing laws of the west, including the United States. Originally issued in 1215 by King John of England as a way of dealing with his own political crisis, the Magna Carta was the first governmental decree establishing the principle that all people—including the king—were equally subject to the law.
Key Document in U.S. Political Foundations
In particular, the Magna Carta had a significant impact on the American Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the constitutions of various U.S. states. Its influence is also reflected in the beliefs held by eighteenth-century Americans that the Magna Carta affirmed their rights against oppressive rulers. In keeping with colonial Americans' general distrust of sovereign authority, most early state constitutions included declarations of rights retained by individual citizens and lists of protections of those citizens from the powers of the state government. Due in part to this conviction to individual liberty first embodied in the Magna Carta, the newly-formed United States also adopted the Bill of Rights.
The American Bill of Rights
Several of the natural rights and legal protections enumerated in both the state declarations of rights and the United States Bill of Rights descend from rights protected by Magna Carta. A few of these include:
Freedom from unlawful searches and seizures
The right to a speedy trial
A right to a jury trial in both criminal and civil cases
Protection from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
The exact phrase from the 1215 Magna Carta referring to “due process of law” is in Latin, but there are various translations. The British Library translation reads: “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.”
In addition, many broader constitutional principles and doctrines have their roots in America’s eighteenth-century interpretation of the Magna Carta, such as the theory of representative government, the idea of a supreme law, a government based on a clear separation of powers, and the doctrine of judicial review of legislative and executive acts.
Journal of the Continental Congress
Evidence of the influence of the Magna Carta on the American system of government can be found in several key documents, including the Journal of the Continental Congress, which is the official record kept of the Congress's deliberations between May 10, 1775, and March 2, 1789. In September and October 1774, the delegates to the first Continental Congress drafted a Declaration of Rights and Grievances, in which the colonists demanded the same liberties guaranteed to them under “the principles of the English constitution, and the several charters or compacts.”
They demanded self-government, freedom from taxation without representation, the right to a trial by a jury of their own countrymen, and their enjoyment of “life, liberty, and property” free from interference from the English crown.
The Federalist Papers
Written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, and published anonymously between October 1787 and May 1788, the Federalist Papers were a series of eighty-five articles intended to build support for the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. Despite the widespread adoption of declarations of individual rights in state constitutions, several members of the Constitutional Convention generally opposed adding a bill of rights to the federal Constitution.
In Federalist No. 84, published during the summer of 1788, Hamilton argued against the inclusion of a bill of rights, stating: “Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything they have no need of particular reservations.” In the end, however, the Anti-Federalists prevailed and the Bill of Rights—based largely on the Magna Carta—was appended to the Constitution in order to secure its final ratification by the states.
The Bill of Rights as Proposed
As originally proposed to Congress in 1791, there were twelve amendments to the constitution. These were strongly influenced by the state of Virginia’s Declaration of Rights of 1776, which in turn incorporated a number of the protections of the Magna Carta.
As a ratified document, the Bill of Rights included five articles directly reflecting these protections: Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures (4th),
Protection of rights to life, liberty, and property (5th),
Rights of accused persons in criminal cases (6th),
Rights in civil cases (7th), and
Other rights kept by the people (8th).
What were some common characteristics of most traditional African
religions? Choose the Two correct answers.
They involved rituals.
They worshipped a single god.
They honored their ansestors
Answer:
I think maybe 1 and 3
Explanation:
HELP ME PLEASE!!!
For all of the sections below, write a summary of the section.
The Civil War-
Impacts on Utah-
The Army Leaves-
Utah Sends Troops-
Enslaved People are Freed-
A New Guard-
The War Ends-
Answer:
Less than 200,000 slaves were freed after the Civil War.
Explanation:
Help me please.....................................
what aree the benefits of team sport?
Answer:
Team sports help teach adolescents accountability, dedication, leadership and other skills.
Many athletes do better academically. ...
Sports teach teamwork and problem-solving skills. ...
Physical health benefits of sports. ...
Sports boost self-esteem. ...
Reduce pressure and stress with sports.
it's mainly helps to Get togetherness in team work and helps to achieve success easily by helping each other in the team....
P
$60
$40
$20 - - -
D
100
150
200
Q
11. What is the equilibrium quantity?
A. 100
B. 150
D. 200
E.O
Answer:
Option B
150
Hope this helps you. Do mark me as brainliest.
What was the impact of Fredericksburg? ( in ur own words )
Answer:
nothing
Explanation:
i have on idea
Answer:
Explanation:
The Battle of Fredericksburg was a major defeat for the Union Army. Although the Union vastly outnumbered the Confederates (120,000 Union men to 85,000 Confederate men) they suffered over twice as many casualties (12,653 to 5,377). This battle signaled the low-point of the war for the Union.
- creds to ducksters!!
what is the importance of advertising in a media industry
Answer:
Advertising helps to sustain the press and other media by providing an important source of income to the press, radio and television network. The customers are also benefited because of increased circulation of their publications. It also encourages commercial art.
9.How did Abbasid rulers support arts and
literature?
Answer:
Art, poetry, and science flourished. The Abbasids learned from the Chinese (allegedly from Chinese soldiers captured in battle) the art of making paper. Cheap and durable, paper became an important material for spreading literature and knowledge. The fifth caliph of the Abbasid dynasty, Harun al-Rashid.
Explanation:
How do legislators see their job?
Answer:They do policy research, draft bills, write legal opinions, evaluate programs and assess how legislation will affect the state's budget. They have other roles, too, including helping constituents, handling public relations, providing building security and information technology support.
Explanation:
From Sudhir's experiences what do you see as the advantages of participant observation? Its at disadvantages? Do you think that doing sociological research justifies being present at beatings? At the planning of drive-by shootings?
Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
According to the passage, what connected Asia and North America
Answer:
There once was a land bridge that connected Asia and North America some 15-20,000ish years ago that was used during the ice age. This ice bridge connected from what I believe to be eastern Russia (somewhere around that area) to westerm Alaska that helped the migration from Asia to North America and from North America to Asia. With the rise of sea levels and melted glaciers the land bridge basically drowned and melted never to be seen or used again.
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ASAP
Using four or more complete sentences, analyze the achievements of Chief Justice John Marshall.
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
Answer:
easy he was cool. had a lot of fighting experience. fought in ww1. he was married had 4 kids. he was an awesome chief
Explanation:
What major cities were not under Roman control in 44 BC
States are prohibited from ?
(4 Points)
A) borrowing money.
B) take land for public use.
C) making treaties with foreign governments.
D) establishing state police agencies without congressional approval.
E) creating units of local government.
What is the difference between Sunni and Shia (Islam) pls help hurry!!
Why is it necessary for government to provide schools and hospitals for its citizens?
Answer:
It is necessary because the government can make sure that people are not excluded from schools or hospitals in case they do not have enough income to pay.
If all schools and hospitals were privatized, and government involvement disappeared, it is likely that many people simply would not have enough money to pay for educational or healthcare service. This would leave them depending on charity like it used to happen in the early 20th century.
Identify the constitutional provision that is common in both United States v. Virginia (1996) and Brown v. Board of Education (I) (1954). Based on the constitutional provision provided in part (A), explain how the decision in Brown v. Board of Education (I) (1954) compares to the decision in United States v. Virginia (1996). Explain how voters who disagree with the holding in United States v. Virginia (1996) could act to limit its impact.
Answer:
1. The equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment is the constitutional provision that was common in both cases.
2. Both cases bordered on issues of segregation. While Brown v Board of Education was a suit by African-American parents against the school board who instituted the separate but equal policy that prevented white and black students from attending the same schools, United States v Virginia was a contest about the gender-biased admissions policy of Virginia Military Institute.
3. Voters who disagree with the holding in United States v Virginia can act to limit its impact by demonstrating "exceedingly persuasive justification" to support their view.
Explanation:
The fourteenth amendment states that, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". This law prohibits segregation on whatever basis. The two cases stated above were clear segregations based on race and gender respectively. In both cases, the supreme court ruled against the segregators.
For voters who wanted to contest the holding of the court, exceedingly persuasive justification was required of them. That was lacking in the defense of the VMI.
What the capital of Washington?
Answer:
The capital of Washington state is Olympia, Washington.
Explain the role the Green Mountain Boys played in preparing the colonists for fighting against the British?
Please dont post anything inappropriate, I had this question up before and someone posted something that traumatized me so please, if you want to do things like that, please go somewhere else and post that. Not on an actual question, Thank you and have a nice day. And if you are one of those people who post these kind of things, you should be ashamed of yourself, there are children on this app that are trying to get help on their homework and instead, end up seeing those disgusting pictures. And why isn't brainly doing anything to stop this?
Answer:
thanks for the warning and yes their are many kids in this app that shouldn't see that I'm one of them these people are disgusting
Tell me a crazy story you have experienced
giving brainlist if u get it right! The United States achieves its foreign policy goals by:
a. following the orders of international organization
B. Attacking any country that warms trade block.
C. Using diplomacy to peacefully solve problems
D. Relying on the philosophy of isolationism
Answer:
C. using diplomacy
Explanation:
I learned it in social studies(also that is the most logical answer)
Answer:
The first on was right
Explanation:
What had most northern states done by 1850
LeBron just singlehandedly trolled Utah
Answer: facts cos
Explanation: