Answer: c
Explanation: took the test
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. Exigent circumstances following exceptions allow him to enter the home. Thus, the correct option is (C).
In the context of the criminal process, an exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation demanding immediate action to avert imminent risk to life or substantial property damage, or to avoid the probable escape of a suspect or the loss of evidence.
Conditions requiring a warrantless entrance, search, or seizure by police when a warrant would normally be necessary compare knock and announce rule, and no-knock search warrant at the warrant.
Therefore, the correct option is "C".
To know more about the exigent circumstances, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ2
How was DNA evidence used to prove that Dr. Sam Sheppard did not murder his wife?
who do you want to win the election
what did Elle woods do in legally blonde to be a lawyer? (do not answer this)
Answer:
she went to harvard law
Explanation:
Answer:
she took classes in harvard law and proved herself to her ex that shes not a dumb blonde
Explanation:
what is multi party system
Answer:
a system with more than one political party
Explanation:
for example the USA has both a Republican and Democratic party along with green
Answer:
where there are a number of national as well as regional parties. A regional party may gain a majority and rule a particular state. If a party is represented in more than 4 states, it would be labelled a national party.
Can someone help me out with these? Please and thank you!
A constituent is a person who is represented politically by a designated government official or
officeholder
True
O False
possible outcomes when senators vote?
All are done a couple of days after birth to minimize stress except?
O iron shot
O clip needle teeth
O dock tail
O slaughter
the first generation of computers used vaccum tubes .Why were they replaced by the transistors
Answer: They were replaced Because the transistor was so much smaller and consumed significantly less power, a computer system built with transistors was also much smaller, faster, and more efficient than a computer system built with vacuum tubes.
What makes the Magna Carta a significant document?
Answer:
Its important because it influenced the constituition that we have today, not only that but it created no one else to be above the law including the King at the time.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Betty cut Anna when she slapped her. Anna suffered just a slight cut and a few drops of blood fell. Tom then got mad at Anna and shot her, and Anna lost a lot more blood, worth about as much fits into a 2 liter of Sprite. Anna bled to death.
DID BETTY CAUSE ANNA’S DEATH?
Answer:
okay according to me I think that but she was not responsible because she only cut anna and a few drops of blood fell but job short Anna and and bled to death so I think Tom was the one responsible for Anna's death
Another name for legal penalties is
A. crime
B. sanctions
C. jail term
D. probation
Answer:
B - Sanctions
Explanation:
The definition of sanctions is : ¨ a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule. ¨ I hope this helps!
Why does the Lincoln Project think provoking President Trump is a good idea?
Explanation:
They’re all made by the Lincoln Project, a political action committee led by high-profile Republicans who want to topple Trump, using firepower they’ve previously trained on Democrats.
And over the course of the last year, the group has moved from an insidery novelty to an online sensation to one that is raising real money. It might have a meaningful effect on this fall’s election.
Emphasis on “might.” The Lincoln Project’s strategy and tactics are a moving target, so it’s hard to get a grip on what it’s really doing and whether it will work. But the group most definitely has the attention of political insiders — some think it could be a useful ally to Joe Biden and actual Democrats; others suggest that it’s not much more than a publicity stunt. Either way, the Lincoln Project has your attention, whether you realize it or not.
Why do candidates interested in pretrial services need to have an interest in different locations?
A. Their chief work is to monitor electronic ankle bracelets.
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
C. They will learn to serve in one specific judge's jurisdiction.
D. They will need to learn everything about parole.
Answer:
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
Explanation:
Is it enough to be “suspected” of terrorism, or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?
* This is for Criminal Justice *
While the car is in motion, it's only safe for _____ to interact with GPS.
A. an adult
B. the driver
C. a passenger
D. a driver over 21
Answer:
D
Explanation:
kasi yon ang alam ko HAHAHAHA
ROUND 3 FREE BRAINIEST
Answer:
thanks
Explanation:
As a health care professional which rights re often the easiest to honor which rights are more difficult to honor
Answer:
There are four principal of healthcare rights . they are autonomy, beneficience Nonmalfeasance Integrity is the most Difficult right to Honour
explain the difference between personal injury protection and property damage liability insurance
who makes the us energy policy
Answer:
The energy policy of the United States is determined by federal, state, and local entities in the ... Prius may cost much less than the current model. Larger advanced-technology batteries have been suggested to make it plug-in rechargeable
Problem solving should be based on which of the following techniques?
action and reaction
first identified, first solved
immediate determination
investigative process
Answer:
investigative process :)
Explanation:
i just did the assignment lol
i hope this helps ;)
What argument can be made that would have kept president bush from becoming the running mate of john mccain in 2008?
Answer:
The dummies would argue two term limit but he would have been vice President not president
Which act did the US Government pass in 1983 to protect labor forces from harassment at the hands of security personnel?
Answer:
yea its fair labor standards act
The US Government pass in 1983 to protect labor forces from harassment at the hands of security personnel is the State Labor Legislation Act.
What is Labor?
The term “Labor” refers to the amount of physical, mental, and social effort used to produce goods and services in an economy.
The 1983 state labor laws featured a number of important new laws and addressed a wide range of topics. Equal compensation for labor of equivalent value, and requirements that workers be informed of and get training on harmful substances discovered at work.
Hence, the significance of to protect labor forces is aforementioned.
Learn more about on protect labor forces, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17448063
#SPJ2
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include _____.an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime
more opportunities for acquittal
longer sentences for drug crimes
more serious punishments for drug crimes
PLS ANSWER ASAP
Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include "more serious punishments for drug crimes" (Option E)
What is Drug Crime?A drug-related crime involves the possession, production, or distribution of narcotics with the potential for abuse.
Drugs are also associated with crime since drug trafficking and manufacturing are frequently controlled by drug cartels, organized crime, and gangs.
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was passed by the United States House of Representatives and Senate in order to intensify Federal efforts to foster international drug law enforcement cooperation, improve enforcement of U.S. drug laws, enhance interdiction efforts, and to provide leadership in developing drug abuse deterrence.
Learn more about Drugs:
https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1
Answer: an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime and more serious punishments for drug crimes
Explanation: had to put 2 so got it wrong on edge
Ned decides to use instrumental methods to analyze trace evidence found at a crime scene. Which items might he use?
A.
test tubes
B.
Bunsen burner
C.
mass spectrometer
D.
lifting tape
E.
forceps
Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
no sir we don't do that here
What can a candidate do to attract undecided voters In a swing state?
Choose more than one answer.
A. Cut back on fundraising efforts in that state
B. Select a running mate from that state
C. Refuse to participate in debates
D. Spend millions of dollars on local ads
E. Give speeches and organize rallies across the state
F. Switch parties in the middle of the race
Answer:
E D and B ia the answeres
Honest question... if I’m 16 or 17 and want to live with my older sister who is 23, can I? My parents gave me permission, I have a job and I’m gonna help with rent for our apartment. So how would the landlords know my parents gave permission without court involved? My sister has 2 jobs and I’m online schooling and I have a job as well we both will help with rents and other necessities. But how will the landlords know we are not lying? How do they know without court involved? Please..
Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
When are jurors allowed to consider evidence? PLEASE ANSWERRRR FAST AND CORRECTLY WILL MARK BRAINLIESTTTT
Answer:
The jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision. The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases.
Explanation:
A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c). (b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.
A man was arguing with a police officer and was shot in the stomach. Though he lost consciousness, he continued struggling with the officer while unconscious, causing the policeman’s gun to discharge. The police officer’s gunshot the police officer who died right away (adapted from People v. Newton).
WOULD THE UNCONSCIOUS MAN’S ACTIONS BE CONSIDERED VOLUNTARY (ACTION UNDER HIS CONTROL) OR INVOLUNTARY(ACTION NOT UNDER HIS CONTROL)? WHY?
WILL HE BE CONVICTED OF HOMICIDE?
Answer:
This is a bit complex. According to the case, People v. Newton the petitioner did not subject himself to criminal liability by virtue of a voluntary act. Therefore, the unconscious man's actions would be considered voluntary simply because he was operating his weapon. Moreover, he will not be convicted of homicide.
Explanation: