Answer:
Namibia's sophisticated legal system displays pluralism. A hybrid legal system, it combines African customary laws and post-Independence state laws with elements of Roman-Dutch common law, English common law, and South African law. Overall, Namibia belongs to the family of common law legal systems.
Expain how a group of four, each with a different winning color, could work together
Answer:
They could put all of their colors together.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), at any time, more than _______ Americans are missing; more than _______ unidentified human remains are found in America every year; and by a year after discovery, roughly _______ of these have still not been identified.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), at any time, more than 600,000 Americans are missing; more than 40,000 unidentified human remains are found in America every year; and by a year after discovery, roughly 30,000 of these have still not been identified.
National Missing and Unidentified Persons SystemThe National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is a national information clearinghouse and resource center for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed person cases across the United States. Watch the video introduction from Lucas Zarwell, Director, Office of Investigative and Forensic Services, NIJ to learn more
NamUs provides technology, forensic services, and investigative support to resolve missing person and unidentified remains cases.
learn more about National Missing and Unidentified Persons System: https://brainly.com/question/2405419
1.
Traffic laws..
A) promote safety in the driving
environment.
B)
contribute to a common
understanding among users of the
roadway.
C) keep order and movement in traffic.
D) All of the above are correct.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
This is because if you look at the questions and think about all the types of traffic laws you can infer that the answer is D
Trial courts in the federal judicial system are called.
Answer:
The constitution created the Supreme Court and authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system's present form, 94 district-level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8
Answer:
Explanation:
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8
QUESTION 38
2 points
Save An
Limits that are placed on the extent and type of campaigning a judicial candidate may or may not engage in or the information
that can be discussed in a judicial campaign can be a disadvantage to electing a judge for office
A)True
B)False
Which federal agency makes sure federal wildlife laws are followed?.
Answer:
rspca
Explanation:
Speed limits are designed for severe weather.
True
False
The problem with labeling a whole group or race of people as predisposed to crime is that the majority are not criminals. The very fact that not all men with crooked noses became criminals would seem to disprove Lombroso’s theories outright. How did Konrad Lorenz attempt to explain the good behavior of some who Darwin taught were ‘less evolved’?
He said that when put in difficult circumstances, these inborn instincts would come out.
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
He said that by mixing the races, the crime rates would diminish.
He said that those who did not commit crime were evolving past their genetics.
Answer:
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
Explanation:
He claimed that these ingrained tendencies would manifest themselves under trying conditions. As a result, Option (A) is the right alternative.
Who is Konrad Lorenz?Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was an ornithologist, zoologist, and ethologist from Austria. Together with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, he was awarded the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. He is frequently credited with helping to establish modern ethology or the study of animal behavior.
The nature of instinctual behavioral acts, in particular how such acts arise and the supply of neural energy for their performance, were the subject of Lorenz's early scientific contributions. He also looked into how a simultaneous activation of two or more animals' basic urges could result in behavior.
Hence, Option (A) is the right one.
Learn more about Konrad Lorenz, from:
brainly.com/question/6834123
#SPJ5
Discuss how drugs and substance abuse in prisons can affect the safety of inmates and staff.
what are courts often involved in cases concerning eminent domain
Answer:
One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states
In which century did the western roman empire came to a fall
Answer:
The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476, and the Western imperial court in Ravenna was formally dissolved by Justinian in 554. The Eastern imperial court survived until 1453.
Explanation:
The Western Roman Empire comprises the western provinces of the Roman Empire at any time during which they were administered by a separate independent Imperial court; in particular, this term is used in historiography to describe the period from 286 to 476, where there were separate coequal courts dividing the governance of the empire in the Western and the Eastern provinces, with a distinct imperial succession in the separate courts.
Which type of rights ensure equal treatment under the law?
O substantive rights
O procedural rights
O unenumerated rights
O civil rights
Civil rights ensure equal treatment under the law.
Under what circumstances can a police officer search your car?.
Why are you reading this?
Which of the following information is collected in the process of determining the prevalence of criminal activity? Select ALL that apply.
x. the age of the victim of crime
x. the height of the suspected criminal
x. the geographic location in which crimes occur
x. the ethnicity of crime victims
The information collected in the process of determining the prevalence of criminal activity include the following:
The age of the victim of crime.The geographic location in which crimes occur.The ethnicity of crime victims.What is Criminal activity?This involves serious offense such as murder etc which is punishable by the law of the state.
The information listed above are used in determining the prevalence of crime in a given area.
Read more about Criminal activity here https://brainly.com/question/1041638
Do you think society asks much of thecriminal court? explain your answer
Answer:
According to The Opportunity Agenda's new Opportunity Survey, 69 percent of the public thinks the criminal justice system is “not good.” Although a slight majority thinks society would be better served by “stricter punishment for people convicted of crimes."
Explanation:
Should habitual offender laws (3-Strikes laws), be used as a sentencing option in US Courts? Are they effective at reducing crime?
Which restriction does the U.S. government place on personal freedoms?
A. Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
B. Personal freedoms must serve the U.S. government.
C. Personal freedoms can cause harm only to people in the minority.
D. Personal freedoms must contribute to the common good.
Answer:
A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Explanation:
Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.
the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All
Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.
The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.
When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?
The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.
But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.
Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.
That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.
- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.
Experienced incidents when your rights were disregarded or violated
Answer:
If you belive your rights in rhe bill of rights are not being followed,you can do any of the options below:
1.Make a complaint to long term care home.
2.Make sure the long term care home for breach of contract.
3.consider other options.
Explanation:
hope this will be helpful for you
Though high-profile business bankruptcies such as Sports Authority and Radio Shack dominate the news, over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals. T/F
It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
What is bankruptcy filings?A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.
Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.
In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
Read more about bankruptcy filing
brainly.com/question/26392690
What is the difference between declaration and statement?
Answer:
A statement can be a clear expression of something in speech or writing.
Declaration formal or explicit statement or announcement.
The difference between a declaration and a statement is that a declaration is a written or oral indication of a fact, opinion, or belief while a statement is a declaration or remark.
What do you mean by Declaration?A declaration is a written statement, affirmed to be true under penalty of perjury by any person who has a thorough knowledge of the affairs of the court case.
A statement can be a clear expression of something in speech or writing.A declaration is an official or explicit statement or declaration.Thus, The difference between a declaration and a statement is that a declaration is a written or oral indication of a fact, on the other hand a statement is a declaration or remark.
To learn more about declaration:
https://brainly.com/question/6296354
#SPJ4
What is the tone of the following text, what words are used to support the tone? Explain.
The verdict in the O.J. Simpson trial has given new life to the old quip that if you ever get into trouble with the law; your fate is likely to be determined by twelve people who are not even smart enough to get out of jury duty.
The tone in the passage is a pessimistic and sad one.
What is Tone?
This refers to the mood implied by an author's word choice and the way that the text can make a reader feel.
The tone is pessimistic and sad because the author feels justice wasn't served as can be seen in 'your fate is likely to be determined by twelve people who are not even smart enough to get out of jury duty'.
Read more about Tone here https://brainly.com/question/22345646
is/are NOT a possible consequence
of careless driving.
A) Injury or death to you or others
B) Financial losses
C) Increased safety
D) Legal troubles
Increased safety is not a possible consequence of careless driving.
What doe the term careless driving mean?This is used to denote the type of driving that can put lives at risk. It is careless because the person on the wheel may cause accidents on the road.
This person may be intoxicated or driving above the speed limit. They may also put others at risk.
Read more on driving here: https://brainly.com/question/1071840
why do community report the crime instead of taking it in their own hands
Answer:
Communities will perhaps rather report a crime instead of "taking things into their own hands," because they want to avoid conflict or may have no true interest in what they're reporting.
Explanation:
^
Answer:
the community report the crimes because of the principle of rule of law which states the supremacy and it means that no one can take it into their own hands
Why do we often say that a corporation is subject to "double taxation"?
Answer:
We often say that a corporation is subject to " double taxation " because the corporation legal entities and datas are seperated from their shareholders.
Jack and Jill Forensics Style
Answer the following questions based on information in the Crime Scene S.P.O.T.
1. Identify several key pieces of evidence within the story. How were they useful to investigators?
2. What evidence in the story is class evidence and what evidence is individual? Explain.
3. How can Locard's exchange principle help investigate in this case?
4. Choose a fairy tale or nursery rhyme story as the basis for your own forensic story. Be sure to include details about evidence. In 5-7 sentences, choose 1 popular fairytale (give the title and state the evidence etc…)
I add the information!!!
The several key pieces of evidence within the story are:
The crushed grass.The boulder with blood.The red sweater matched the one found in Jill's room.These were useful to investigators because they helped them to reconstruct the crime scene, understand the motive and nab the killer.
The class evidence in this story is the pail atop the hill and the individual evidence was the red sweater.
What is Forensics?This refers to the scientific tests which are carried out usually at a crime scene to get more information about the nature of the crime and the perpetrator(s).
Read more about crime scenes here:
https://brainly.com/question/19238665
What powers does the supreme court have in choosing cases
Answer:
interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied.
The power that supreme court have are to determine whether a law applies to a certain set of facts or to make a decision on how a law should be implemented.
What are the main functions of the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court's principal responsibility is to ensure independent, open, fair, and efficient dispute resolution in conformity with the federal and state constitutions and laws.
The Supreme Court hears cases in a variety of ways: A party who has lost a case before the Court of Appeals can ask for a review of the decision.
Thus, supreme court have powers like evaluating the law and the application of different laws.
For further information about the supreme court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12603347
#SPJ4
Alice approaches you for advice. she informs you that she owes many people a lot of money and wishes to apply for Her own voluntary surrender. she asks if you could perhaps, as her best friend, help her to write a formal letter to give to her brother, stating that she can no longer pay her debts to him. discuss what this action above is called and refer to a relevant legislation. also advise alice as to whether she will succeed in her action to apply for voluntary surrender.
This process which Alice wants to take is known as insolvency,
What is Voluntary Surrender?This refers to the repossession which involves the return of items that were conditions for a loan.
Hence, we can note that this involves telling your lenders that you are unable to make payments on a loan and because Alice is in insolvency, then it would be worth noting that collateral would have to be repossessed as she cannot pay her brother.
Read more about insolvency here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142634
Question 28: There is an old saying that it’s better for 100 guilty people to go free than for an innocent person to be unjustly punished. Do you agree? Why or why? What do you think is the right balance for our society to strike?
Answer:
I think that that is correct
Explanation:
because pitting an innocent person away would do nothing. The person that actually did it might do something bad again and then that person that they blamed are in there for nothing.