The term that refers to money provided by the defendant to ensure their appearance in court is known as bail.
A bail is a form of security that is typically set by the court to ensure that the defendant appears for all their court hearings and does not flee from the legal system. The amount of bail can vary based on the severity of the crime and the flight risk of the defendant.
Once the defendant has met all the conditions of their bail agreement and has appeared for all their court hearings, the bail money is typically returned to them. However, if the defendant fails to meet their bail conditions, the bail may be forfeited and the defendant may be arrested and taken into custody.
Learn more about bail:
brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ11
Discuss whether Crimea of Ukraine has a legal right to form new state.
Discuss the issues that were at the core of the Scottsboro case and the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions delivered in the case.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Scottsboro case was a landmark legal case in the United States that began in 1931 and continued for over a decade. The case centred around nine black teenagers who were accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama. The case became a symbol of racial injustice in the United States and raised important questions about the role of race in the criminal justice system.
At the core of the Scottsboro case was the issue of racial discrimination. The defendants were charged and convicted in a highly charged atmosphere of racial hatred and bigotry, and they received little in the way of a fair trial. The Scottsboro defendants were initially sentenced to death, and although the U.S. Supreme Court overturned their convictions twice, they were eventually found guilty again and sentenced to long prison terms.
The consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the Scottsboro case were significant. The Court's decisions highlighted the need for greater protection of defendants' rights in criminal trials, especially in cases where racial bias may be present. The Scottsboro case led to important legal precedents that helped to establish a defendant's right to a fair trial and the right to an impartial jury.
The Scottsboro case also helped to raise awareness about the issue of racial discrimination and segregation in the United States. The case became a rallying cry for the civil rights movement, and it helped to galvanize support for the movement's efforts to end segregation and secure equal rights for all Americans.
Overall, the Scottsboro case was a pivotal moment in the struggle for civil rights in the United States. It brought issues of racial discrimination to the forefront of public consciousness and helped to shape the legal and social landscape of the country. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of justice and equality in all aspects of society.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Trial courts in the federal system are called: Trial courts in the federal system are called: U.S. Circuit Courts U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Courts of Appeals U.S. District Courts
Trial courts in the federal system are called U.S. District Courts. These courts are responsible for hearing cases that involve federal law or disputes between parties from different states.
The U.S. District Courts are the lowest level of federal courts, and they are located in different regions throughout the United States. When a decision from a U.S. District Court is appealed, it is sent to the U.S. Courts of Appeals, which are the intermediate level of the federal court system. The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest level of the federal court system and is responsible for hearing appeals from the U.S. Courts of Appeals and making final decisions on important legal issues.
Learn more about federal courts here:
https://brainly.com/question/16314718
#SPJ11
_______________ is a rule in tort law, used in the majority of states, that reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to the plaintiff's degree of fault, rather than barring recovery completely.
The rule in tort law that you are referring to is known as comparative negligence.
This legal principle is widely used in the majority of states and aims to allocate responsibility between the plaintiff and defendant in a lawsuit. Comparative negligence operates by reducing the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in proportion to their own degree of fault in causing their injuries.
In other words, if a plaintiff is found to be partially responsible for their own injuries, their damages award will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 25% at fault for an accident that caused them $100,000 in damages, they would only be able to recover $75,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 25%).
Comparative negligence is designed to promote fairness and accuracy in tort law by holding each party responsible for their contribution to the harm suffered. It allows for a more nuanced approach to determining liability, rather than an all-or-nothing approach that would completely bar recovery for plaintiffs who are partially at fault.
Learn more about plaintiff :
https://brainly.com/question/29213966
#SPJ11
Micah is brought before a juvenile court judge and there is considerable evidence to show that Micah is guilty of violating the criminal law. In this situation, the judge has the power to ____________.
The judge in a juvenile court has the power to adjudicate, or find Micah guilty of violating the criminal law and impose a sentence or punishment.
The process in juvenile court is different from the process in adult court, and the judge will typically consider factors such as the age, maturity, and background of the juvenile in determining the appropriate sentence.
In some cases, the judge may order rehabilitation or treatment rather than punishment, depending on the circumstances of the case.
The goal of the juvenile justice system is often to provide guidance and support to young offenders in an effort to prevent them from continuing to engage in criminal behavior in the future.
To know more about juvenile court, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2342468#
#SPJ11
Answer: decide it is not in Juan's best interest to be adjudicated delinquent
A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is: illegal and void. enforceable as a quasi-contract. illegal and voidable. illegal and dischargeable.
A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is considered illegal and void. This means that the contract is not legally binding and cannot be enforced by either party.
It is important to note that the illegality of the contract must be related to the purpose of the contract, rather than incidental or minor violations of the law. For example, a contract to sell illegal drugs would be illegal and void, but a contract to sell a car where one party happened to be driving without a license would likely still be enforceable. It is not possible for the contract to be enforceable as a quasi-contract, as quasi-contracts arise when there is no actual contract in place but one party has received unjust enrichment at the expense of the other. In the case of an illegal contract, there is no valid contract, to begin with.
The contract is also not simply voidable, which would mean that one party has the option to void or cancel the contract at their discretion. Instead, the contract is considered illegal and void, meaning that it is null and void from the outset and cannot be ratified or enforced.
Finally, the contract is not dischargeable, as discharge typically refers to the release of a party from their obligations under a contract. In the case of an illegal contract, there are no valid obligations, to begin with, so discharge is not applicable.
In summary, a contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void, which means it is not enforceable and has no legal effect. This is a detailed answer to your question that provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications of an illegal contract.
Learn more about quasi-contract
https://brainly.com/question/29651556
#SPJ11
A contract that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract opposes public policy and societal interests. Additionally, if any contract limits competition and encourages illegal activities, it also falls under such a category.
Explanation:A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract is not enforceable, as it opposes public policy and societal interests. Generally, a legal system must enforce contracts to ensure economic transactions and growth. However, if a contract encourages illegal activities, this opposes the purpose of law and justice, therefore, it falls into the category of an unlawful contract.
Consider this example for a clearer understanding: If a large retailer obtained the exclusive rights to be the only distributor of televisions, computers, and audio equipment made by various companies, then, this exclusive contract despite potentially being legal, may limit competition and hence, it would have an anticompetitive effect and could be ruled as unlawful.
Learn more about Unlawful Contracts here:https://brainly.com/question/33763152
#SPJ6
Convicted criminals whose sentences increase during their prison term due to a change in the law have been illegally subjected to what kind of law
Convicted criminals whose sentences increase during their prison term due to a change in the law have been illegally subjected to ex post facto law.
Ex post facto is a Latin term that means "after the fact." In law, it refers to a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the enactment of the law.
The U.S. Constitution specifically prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws. This means that the government cannot punish someone for an action that was not a crime when they committed it, or increase the punishment for an action that was a crime when they committed it.
Therefore, if a criminal's sentence is increased during their prison term due to a change in the law, it would be a violation of the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
To know more about Convicted criminals, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19990011#
#SPJ11
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.
The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.
The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.
The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.
To learn more about competency examinations, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31646918
#SPJ4
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________
The role of the judge in the common-law tradition differs from the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition in that ______.
The role of the judge in the common-law tradition differs from the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition in several ways.
In the common-law tradition, judges play a significant role in creating and interpreting laws through the use of judicial precedent. This means that judges have the power to make law based on their interpretation of previous court decisions. This is in contrast to the civil-law tradition where judges are bound by the legal code and are not able to create new laws through judicial precedent. Instead, judges in the civil-law tradition are responsible for applying the law to the facts of the case before them.
Another key difference between the two traditions is the level of discretion that judges have. In the common-law tradition, judges have a great deal of discretion when interpreting laws and applying them to individual cases. This is because the law is often vague and open to interpretation. In contrast, judges in the civil-law tradition have less discretion since the law is typically more prescriptive and detailed.
Overall, the role of the judge in the common-law tradition is more active and creative, while the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition is more passive and focused on applying the law to the specific case at hand.
Learn more about court :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
Question 2 of 10
What role does the U.S. Constitution play in creating local governments?
A. It specifies the types of local governments that can be created by
the states.
B. It gives the states the authority to create any local governments
they need.
C. It gives the federal government the power to create any type of
local government.
OD. It requires that all local governments have constitutions based on
the federal document.
4
The role the U.S. Constitution play in creating local governments is It gives the states the authority to create any local governments they need. Option B
What is the role of the U.S. Constitution in creating local governmentsThe ability to establish local governments is delegated to each states by the United States Constitution. This means that each state has the ability to form and structure its own local governments in accordance with its state constitution and any applicable legislation.
The United States Constitution does not specify the structure or sorts of municipal governments that states may establish. Instead, it reserves all powers not expressly given to the federal government by the Constitution to the states.
Learn more about US constitution at https://brainly.com/question/27954283
#SPJ1
Evidence that would have been discovered even without the need for a warrant can be admissible under the:
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures and requires that warrants be supported by probable cause and be issued based on specific descriptions of the place to be searched and the items to be seized.
However, there are some exceptions to the warrant requirement, and one of these is the "plain view" doctrine. Under the plain view doctrine, evidence that is in plain view of a law enforcement officer who is lawfully present in a location can be seized without a warrant and may be admissible in court. This means that if an officer is legally present in a location and sees evidence that is immediately recognizable as evidence of a crime, the officer can seize the evidence and use it as evidence in court.
For example, if an officer is lawfully present in a suspect's home to execute an arrest warrant, and sees a gun on the kitchen table that is in plain view doctrine, the officer can seize the gun and use it as evidence in court, even if the officer did not have a search warrant for the home.
To learn more about plain view doctrine, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28332116
#SPJ4
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
________ torts occur when the defendant takes an action that is inherently dangerous and cannot ever be undertaken safely, no matter what precautions the defendant takes, like jumping out of an airplane without a parachute.
The type of tort you are referring to is known as an "ultra-hazardous activity tort."
This is a complex area of law, and providing a detailed answer would require delving into the various legal nuances and interpretations of this particular tort. However, in short, an ultra-hazardous activity tort occurs when the defendant engages in an activity that is so inherently dangerous that no amount of care or precaution can make it safe.
This is different from other types of torts, such as negligence, where the defendant's actions are judged based on a standard of reasonable care. Because ultra-hazardous activities are so inherently dangerous, the law generally holds defendants strictly liable for any harm that results from their actions.
This means that the plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant was negligent, only that the harm was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity. Overall, the long answer to your question is that an ultra-hazardous activity tort is a specific type of tort that arises when the defendant engages in an inherently dangerous activity that cannot be made safe, and the law holds them strictly liable for any resulting harm.
Learn more about torts
https://brainly.com/question/14965931
#SPJ11
When objecting the introduction of a particular piece of evidence, a defense attorney insisted that the exhibit was not material. What did he mean by that
When a defense attorney objects to the introduction of a particular piece of evidence, they may argue that it is not material.
This means that the evidence in question is not relevant to the case at hand, and therefore should not be considered by the judge or jury.
In legal terms, materiality refers to whether or not a piece of evidence has any bearing on the issues being litigated. Evidence that is not material is not considered relevant to the case, and therefore cannot be used to prove or disprove any of the claims being made by either side
To determine whether or not a piece of evidence is material, the judge will consider whether it has any direct or indirect connection to the events or issues at the center of the case. If the evidence is not directly relevant to the case, the judge may sustain the defense attorney's objection and exclude it from consideration.
Overall, when a defense attorney insists that a piece of evidence is not material, they are arguing that it should not be considered because it has no bearing on the case at hand. This is an important part of the legal process, as it helps to ensure that only relevant evidence is considered in making decisions about a case.
Learn more about evidence :
https://brainly.com/question/21428682
#SPJ11
Liability for the negligent conduct of a defendant requires not only that the conduct in fact caused injury to the plaintiff but also that it was the proximate cause of the injury. True False
The statement: Liability for the negligent conduct of a defendant requires not only that the conduct in fact caused injury to the plaintiff but also that it was the proximate cause of the injury is TRUE.
In order to establish liability for negligence, it is not enough that the defendant's conduct caused injury to the plaintiff. The defendant's conduct must also have been the proximate cause of the injury, which means that it was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct.
Proximate cause is often described as a "but for" test, meaning that "but for" the defendant's conduct, the injury would not have occurred. However, proximate cause also requires that the injury was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct.
If the injury was not a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct, then the defendant may not be liable for the injury, even if the defendant's conduct caused the injury.
To know more about proximate cause, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12644777#
#SPJ11
One who commits a tort is called the Multiple Choice tortmaster. torteffector. tortfeasor. tortdoer.
The term for one who commits a tort is a tortfeasor.
A tortfeasor is a person or entity that is responsible for committing a tort, which is a civil wrong that results in harm to another person or their property. Examples of torts include negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and trespassing.
The term "tortfeasor" comes from the Latin words "tortus," which means twisted, and "facere," which means to do or to make. In other words, a tortfeasor is someone who has twisted or distorted the rights of another person through their actions.
When a tort is committed, the injured party can seek damages or compensation from the tortfeasor through a civil lawsuit. The amount of damages awarded depends on the severity of the harm caused, the intent of the tortfeasor, and other factors.
In some cases, the tortfeasor may also face criminal charges if their actions were particularly egregious, such as in cases of assault or battery.
To know more about committing a tort, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669139#
#SPJ11
1. Mr. Rodrigo alyas Digong was held fragrante delicto for taking cartons of Sardines can goods, accused argued that he should only be convicted of frustrated theft for taking can goods from the supermarket since he was immediately apprehended by the security guard. Is the contention of Digong correct? What crime did he committed? Explain why? ( 10 Points)
2. Tiborcio fired at Kurdapyo’s room, although in reality, the latter was not present in his room; thus, Tiborcio failed to kill him. If inherent impossibility of accomplishing the crime. What factual crime does committed by Tiborcio? Explain. ( 10 points )
3. Patrolman Gunggong dropped a hand grenade inside a house, killing Pikoy instantly and causing Butog, Pokang, Dagul & Mokong to suffer shrapnel wounds on their bodies. What crime committed by Patrolman Gunggong for the grave negligence and mistake he committed? ( 10 Points )
In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.
What crime did Digong commit and why?The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.
In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.
Read more about sales contract
brainly.com/question/28326714
#SPJ1
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in ______.
The first time a law journal published an article that explained the legal theory about why U.S. courts should recognize a right to privacy was in 1890.
The article, titled "The Right to Privacy," was written by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis and was published in the Harvard Law Review. In this article, Warren and Brandeis argued that the law should recognize an individual's right to privacy as a natural right that is necessary for the preservation of personal dignity and autonomy.
They contended that this right should protect individuals from the invasion of their private lives by the press and other intrusive actors. The publication of this article was a significant moment in the development of privacy law in the United States and has influenced the development of privacy jurisprudence both in the United States and around the world.
To learn more about right to privacy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
post,
Discuss when reasonable suspicion existed in this scenario.
Make sure to justify your decision.
Next, discuss when probable cause existed in this scenario.
Again, make sure to justify your decision.
Judges will typically address an agreement that consists of both written and oral elements by: ______.
The goal is to give effect to the intentions of the parties, even if that means interpreting the agreement in a way that goes beyond its literal terms.
Judges will typically address an agreement that consists of both written and oral elements by interpreting the agreement as a whole and determining the intentions of the parties involved.
In general, courts will consider all of the evidence available to determine the terms of the agreement, including any written documents, oral testimony, and other relevant evidence. If there are any conflicts between the written and oral elements of the agreement, the court will try to resolve those conflicts based on the context and the intentions of the parties.
In some cases, the court may also consider the surrounding circumstances of the agreement, such as the course of dealings between the parties, the industry practices, and any other relevant factors that could shed light on the parties' intentions.
Learn more about documents here:
https://brainly.com/question/12401517
#SPJ11
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
Henry Knievel suffered a badly broken left leg in a motorcycle accident. Dr. Van Helsing assures Mr. Knievel that he can fix it like it was never broken with a new surgical procedure that Dr. Van Helsing wants to use. "It will be perfect," promises Dr. Van Helsing. Unfortunately, the procedure did not go as planned, and Mr. Knievel’s left leg is now 2" shorter than his right one. Mr. Knievel sues Dr. Van Helsing. Using contract law (not negligence or medical malpractice), how do you measure the damages that Mr. Knievel may recover?
In contract law, the damages that Mr. Knievel may recover are determined by the concept of "expectation damages."
Expectation damages aim to put the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed. In this case, Mr. Knievel expected his leg to be fixed like it was never broken, as promised by Dr. Van Helsing. To measure the damages, one would calculate the difference between Mr. Knievel's current situation (with a leg 2" shorter than the other) and the situation he would have been in had the surgery been successful (with a leg that was fixed like it was never broken).
Factors to consider when calculating damages may include:
1. Additional medical costs: Mr. Knievel might need further treatments or surgeries to address the issue caused by Dr. Van Helsing's procedure.
2. Lost wages: If Mr. Knievel's injury resulted in an inability to work or reduced working capacity, he may be entitled to recover lost wages.
3. Pain and suffering: The court might also take into account any pain and suffering Mr. Knievel experienced due to the unsuccessful procedure.
It's essential to note that this answer is based on contract law principles and not negligence or medical malpractice, which could have different methods for calculating damages.
To know more about contract law visit:
brainly.com/question/29484475
#SPJ11
In tort actions, plaintiffs may seek two kinds of damages: Group of answer choices punitive and compensatory. punitive and special. compensatory and general. compensatory and special.
The plaintiffs in tort actions may seek two kinds of damages: compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are meant to compensate the plaintiff for their losses, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
They are intended to make the plaintiff "whole" again, or at least as close to their pre-injury state as possible. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are intended to punish the defendant for their wrongful conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future. Punitive damages are only awarded in cases where the defendant's actions were particularly egregious or reckless, and are not meant to compensate the plaintiff directly.
The other answer choices are not accurate because "special" damages are simply a type of compensatory damages that are meant to compensate for specific financial losses, and "general" damages are another term for non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering) that are included in compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages, on the other hand, are intended to compensate the plaintiff for their losses and make them whole again. Compensatory damages can be further divided into special (economic) damages, which cover quantifiable losses, and general (non-economic) damages, which cover non-quantifiable losses such as pain and suffering.
To Know more about Compensatory damages
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ11
In __________, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
In criminal law, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
This requirement stems from the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which guarantees defendants the right to a fair and impartial trial. In order for a guilty plea to be valid, the defendant must have a full understanding of the charges against them, the consequences of their plea, and the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. Additionally, the plea must not be the result of coercion or undue influence, such as promises of leniency or threats of harm.
The judge may conduct a colloquy with the defendant, which is a series of questions aimed at ensuring that the defendant is making a voluntary and informed decision to plead guilty. If the judge determines that the plea is not knowingly entered or completely voluntary, the plea may be withdrawn and the case may proceed to trial. Overall, the requirement that a guilty plea be knowingly entered and completely voluntary is an important safeguard in the criminal justice system, as it helps to ensure that defendants are not unfairly pressured into giving up their rights.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
If I go to class tomorrow without having done the reading, my professor will call on me and be angry that I am not prepared. However, if I stay up all night, which is what I would have to do to catch up on the reading, he will be angry because I will be too tired to stay awake in class. The above argument is constructed to lead to which one of the following conclusions?
A. If I go to class tomorrow, my professor will be angry with me.
B. If I stay home tomorrow to catch up on the reading, my professor will be angry that I skipped class.
C. It would be better for me to skip class tomorrow than to stay up late reading
D. My professor will be angry.
E. If my professor is angry with me, it is because I fell behind on the reading.
Partial performance is an exception to the statute of ______ in which the performance of portions of an unwritten agreement by one or both parties can constitute proof that an oral contract exists between the parties.
Partial performance is an exception to the statute of frauds in which the performance of portions of an unwritten agreement by one or both parties.
The statute of frauds requires certain contracts, such as contracts for the sale of land or contracts that cannot be performed within one year, to be in writing in order to be enforceable. However, if one party performs a part of the unwritten agreement, such as paying a deposit or starting work on a project, it may be evidence that there was a verbal agreement between the parties.
This exception to the statute of frauds is based on the idea that it would be unfair to allow a party to use the statute of frauds as a shield to avoid their obligations under an oral contract after having received the benefits of partial performance. However, partial performance must be unequivocally referable to the alleged contract, and the party seeking to enforce the contract must prove that there was an agreement and that it was breached by the other party.
In summary, partial performance is an important exception to the statute of frauds that allows for oral contracts to be enforced if there is evidence of partial performance by one or both parties. However, the requirements for invoking this exception can be difficult to meet and require a thorough understanding of contract law.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
Negligence is classified as: Group of answer choices a punitive tort. an indefensible tort. an unintentional tort. an intentional tort.
The classification of negligence is an unintentional tort.
Negligence is a legal term used to describe a situation where an individual or entity fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person or property.
It is considered an unintentional tort because the person or entity responsible for the harm did not intend to cause it but failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent it from happening.
Negligence is often used as a basis for personal injury lawsuits, and the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty by failing to exercise reasonable care, and caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages.
In many cases, negligence can result in compensatory damages, which are intended to compensate the injured party for their losses, such as medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
To know more about unintentional tort, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14614720#
#SPJ11
A question that a judge must ask to determine whether a proceeding or document is presumptively open is _____.
A question that a judge must ask to determine whether a proceeding or document is presumptively open is whether there is a strong presumption in favour of public access to that particular type of proceeding or document.
In other words, the judge must determine whether there is a legal presumption that the proceeding or document should be open to the public unless there is a compelling reason to close it. This presumption is based on the First Amendment's guarantee of a free press and the public's right to know about the workings of the government.
The judge must also consider any applicable laws or rules that may provide guidance on whether the proceeding or document is presumptively open or closed. Ultimately, the judge must balance the public's interest in access against any countervailing interests, such as privacy concerns or national security considerations, in order to make a determination on whether the proceeding or document should be open or closed.
To know more about Proceedings visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15122322
#SPJ11
What type of court has been designed to focus on treatment options instead of punishment for drug convictions
The type of court that has been designed to focus on treatment options instead of punishment for drug convictions is a drug court.
Drug courts are specialized courts that aim to address the root cause of drug-related criminal activity, which is often substance abuse or addiction. Instead of sending defendants to jail, drug courts offer a range of treatment options, including substance abuse counseling, therapy, and rehabilitation programs.
Participants in drug courts are required to attend regular court appearances, undergo regular drug testing, and comply with the court's treatment plan. Successful completion of the program can result in reduced charges or even dismissal of charges.
Drug courts have been implemented in various jurisdictions across the United States as a way to reduce recidivism rates among drug offenders and promote long-term recovery.
To know more about drug court., refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31677573#
#SPJ11
COMPARE THE QUALIFICATION, FUNCTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF BJMP AND BUCOR. WRITE AN ESSAY ABOUT THE COMPARISON THAT YOU HAVE DONE.
The Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) and the Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) are two government agencies in the Philippines.
How are they different ?The management of local jails and detention facilities lies in the capable hands of the BJMP. Prospective jail officers must meet certain qualifications such as being a Filipino citizen, aged between 21 to 30 years old, completion of a bachelor’s degree, and proven success on the Civil Service Professional Exam.
Similarly, individuals seeking to obtain BuCor officer positions must also adhere to specific requirements that include being a Filipino citizen, at least 21 but not more than 35 years old, having finished an undergraduate education, and passing the Civil Service Professional Exam.
Focused primarily on the safekeeping, rehabilitation, and reformation of inmates held within its jurisdiction's local jails and detention areas, the BJMP remains wholly devoted to these key objectives. Contrarily, the BuCor takes responsibility for managing national prisons and correctional institutions. Its vital mission is centered around preserving safety and security while housing convicted criminals through proper care and implementation of humane practices.
Find out more on functions at https://brainly.com/question/30158000
#SPJ1