Members of Congress generally hold multiple goals, but there is no definitive answer as to which goal comes first.
Members of Congress are elected to represent their constituents and serve the public interest. They often have multiple goals and priorities that they seek to address during their tenure. These goals can include advancing policy agendas, serving their constituents' needs, promoting their party's interests, seeking reelection, or pursuing personal ambitions.
The priority given to each goal can vary depending on individual legislators and the specific circumstances they face. Some members of Congress may prioritize policy goals and strive to enact legislation that aligns with their ideological or policy preferences. Others may prioritize constituent service and focus on addressing the needs and concerns of their constituents.
The relative importance of goals can also shift over time. For example, during election cycles, reelection concerns may take precedence as members seek to maintain their positions in Congress. Additionally, party dynamics and leadership roles can influence the prioritization of goals, as members may align with party strategies and priorities.
Overall, it is difficult to determine a universally applicable order of goals for members of Congress. Each legislator may have their own unique set of priorities and circumstances that shape their decision-making processes and the relative importance they assign to different goals.
To learn more about agendas Click Here: brainly.com/question/28159141
#SPJ11
What more, if anything, must the trial court find in order to sustain the defendant's Sixth Amendment claim
The trial court must find a witness in order to sustain the defendant's Sixth Amendment claim.
Sixth Amendment ClaimThe rights of criminal defendants are guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, including the right to an impartial jury, the right to an impartial judge, the right to a public trial without undue delay, and the right to know your accusers and the details of the allegations and evidence against you. It has been put to the test most visibly in a number of cases concerning terrorism, but it appears much more frequently in matters requiring, for instance, jury selection or witness protection.The accused has the legal right to a quick and open trial by an impartial jury of the state and district where the offense was committed, such district shall have been determined in advance by law, in all criminal cases.
To learn more about the Sixth Amendment Claim refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ4
Promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be _____ by management.
An form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.
What is an intemperate consumption of alcohol?This refers to the consumption of alcohol in an excessive way that can cause great damage to the person engaged in such reckless and harmful habit.
Despite that promotions are designed to increase brand awareness, create interest, generate sales or create brand loyalty, any form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.
Therefore, the word "stopped" is the correct word.
Read more about intemperate
brainly.com/question/11530556
#SPJ1
must haves vs nice-to-haves
Some of the “must-haves” in a job and life as compared to the “nice-to-haves” are as follows:
“Must-haves”Job satisfactionNice team environmentCommunication between colleaguesGood Working environment. “Nice-to-haves”High salaryBenefitsA short commute from homeTo work for a company that has green initiatives.What differentiate “must-haves” from “nice-to-have”?“Must-haves” are essential or motivating criteria that boost work performance and increase the standard of living. These criteria tend to be present before a job is accepted.
“Nice-to-haves” are unessential criteria as they do not motivate performance, but are regarded as additions.
Question Completion:
Consider your “must-haves” in a job and life as compared to the “nice-to-haves.”
Thus, “must-haves” in a job and life as compared to the “nice-to-haves” motivate increased performance in the job.
Learn more about motivating factors at work at https://brainly.com/question/18852626
#SPJ1
What case ruled that an agency may be liable for the conduct of an officer when the agency fails to adequately guard against constitutional injuries through training and supervision?
Answer: Perrin v Gentner
Explanation:
How do you drive with CARE?
Drivers ED
Answer:
pay attention to road signs, pedestrians, cyclists, and kids follow the traffic laws and speed limits
Explanation:
All of the following would be true about Gerrymandering EXCEPT
a
A Provides an incumbent advantage
Builds public approval of Congress
Answer:
Builds public approval of congress
Answer:
MuRdEr?!??
Explanation:
today this the answer TVT I'm Proud of myself
3. Bert purchased Ernie’s car. Before selling the car, Ernie had stated to Bert, “This car runs well and is reliable. Last week I drove the car all the way from Seattle to San Francisco to visit my mother and back again to Seattle.” In fact, Ernie was not telling the truth: he had driven the car to San Francisco to visit his paramour, not his mother. Upon discovery of the truth, may Bert avoid the contract? Why?
Bert cannot avoid the contract, though the sale and purchase transaction was based on Ernie's misrepresentation, he can, however, sue Ernie for misrepresentation.
What is contract misrepresentation?Misrepresentation is a false or misleading statement in a contract that induces the contract.
When the aggrieved party discovers the misrepresentation, they can sue the other party for remedies.
What are the types of misrepresentation?Misrepresentation falls into the following categories:
Fraudulent misrepresentationNegligent misrepresentationInnocent misrepresentation.What are the remedies for misrepresentation?For fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations, the aggrieved party can seek rescission or damages as remedies.
Thus, while Bert cannot avoid the contract with Ernie, he can sue Ernie for fraudulent misrepresentation.
Learn more about fraudulent misrepresentations at https://brainly.com/question/14815861
#SPJ1
Generally, the courts have the power to declare certain types of contracts _______ on the grounds that they are contrary to _______. (Choose two correct answers)
Generally, the courts have the power to declare certain types of contracts void on the grounds that they are contrary to public policy.
Courts commonly follow the law that the parties expressly or impliedly intend to govern the agreement, provided that it bears a reasonable relation to the transaction and the parties acted in correct religion.
The primary factors required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and popularity; ok attention; capability; and legality. In some states, an element of consideration may be glad by using a valid replacement.
A contract is a venture or agreement by using a person or company to do any creation paintings or activity under certain terms and conditions. these terms are used in conditions of settlement in production.
Learn more about the contract here:https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Generally, the legal remedy for breach of contract will be _______ awarded by the court to the nonbreaching party.
Generally, the legal remedy for breach of contract will be money damages awarded by the court to the non-breaching party.
What are money damages?A sort of relief in which money is awarded as recompense for an accident. The amount of money damages, unlike the amount requested in money demand, is not immediately apparent from the circumstances of the case and must be determined by the trier of fact.There are two kinds of damages: compensatory and punitive.What is a legal remedy?A legal remedy, also known as judicial relief or a judicial remedy, is the method by which a court of law, usually in the exercise of civil law jurisdiction, enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will in order to compensate an individual for the harm caused by a wrongful act.Therefore, generally, the legal remedy for breach of contract will be money damages awarded by the court to the non-breaching party.
Know more about money damages here:
https://brainly.com/question/5063656
#SPJ4
quuzlet In Arizona v. Fulminante, the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of:
the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of involuntary confessions.
What are involuntary confessions?An involuntary confession that results from overwhelming police behavior rather than the defendant's free will is referred to as a pressured confession. Because the confession was not the result of the accused's free will, it is involuntary.
What are first signs of involuntary celibacy?Being obese Being thought of being physically unappealing Never having been in a romantic relationshipDoes the harmless error doctrine apply to involuntary confessions?The Court decided in Fulminante that situations regarding the admissibility of involuntary confessions fall under the harmless error theory.
Is Fulminante's confession to Sarivola admissible in court?It is crucial to assess the admissibility of Fulminante's confession to Sarivola in light of the finding by five Justices that the harmless error analysis extends to coerced confessions. For example, see Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U. S. 1, 45 (1989) (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Learn more about Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona:
https://brainly.com/question/3703825?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
When is a Medicare Supplement Insurance consumer subject to underwriting and screened for eligibility?
Answer:If you apply for Medigap coverage after your open enrollment period has passed, you may have to go through medical underwriting. The insurer may review your medical history and refuse to sell you a policy, or sell you one at a higher cost, if you do not meet its underwriting requirements.
Explanation:
what are the actor's of democratization
He describes democracy as a system of government with four key elements: i) A system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; ii) Active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; iii) Protection of the human rights of all citizens; and iv) A rule of law
You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.
1.What would you do?
Things to consider as you prepare
Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.
One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.
One should do what is best for everyone.
One should do one’s duty.
Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.
What is an ethical duty?An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
James is a taxpayer that files married filing separately. he had a tax liability of $6,700 in the previous tax year. his agi is $85,000 and he knows his tax liability will be more this year and expects to have a balance due. what is the minimum amount of tax james needs to pay to avoid an underpayment penalty in 2020?
For James to avoid an underpayment penalty in 2020, he needs to pay $23,912.50.
What is an underpayment penalty?An underpayment penalty is the IRS fine levied on taxpayers who do not pay enough of their estimated tax liability.
According to the IRS rules, to avoid an underpayment penalty, James must pay either 100% of last year's tax or 90% for 2020.
Data and Calculations:Tax liability from 2019 = $6,700
AGI for the current tax year = $85,000
Taxable income = $76,500 (assumed to be 90% of AGI)
Tax rate = 25%
Tax liability for 2020 = $19,125 ($76,500 x 25%)
Minimum tax to pay to avoid underpayment penalty = $23, 912.50 ($6,700 + $19,125 x 90%)
Thus, for James to avoid an underpayment penalty in 2020, he needs to pay $23,912.50.
Learn more about underpayment penalties at https://brainly.com/question/14328731
#SPJ1
The defendant can file a(n) _______ if it is believed that the plaintiff caused her damages arising out of the very same set of facts.
Answer: Cross-claim
Explanation:
A licensee or employee who interferes with a peace officer’s right to inspect an establishment may result in.
A licensee or employee who interferes with a peace officer’s right to inspect an establishment may result in arrest and license revocation.
Who is a peace officer?A peace officer is one who ensures the safety, security, and humane custody and control of offenders. Peace officers also maintain the peace and harmony of the community, thereby forestalling violence.
Unlike a police officer, peace officers prevent serious injuries or death of persons in some dangers. Peace officers also establish evidence at accident scenes.
Some of the powers of the peace officer are detention and arrest of offenders and search and seizure of properties.
Peace officers may not necessarily be members of the Police Service.
Thus, a licensee or employee who interferes with a peace officer’s right to inspect an establishment may result in arrest and license revocation.
Learn more about peace officers at https://brainly.com/question/27949951
#SPJ1
Frequent calls for service to local law enforcement by an on-premises licensee may result in.
There can be a grounds to suspend or revoke the license if there are Frequent calls for law enforcement assistance at an ABC-licensed premises.
What is a licensed premises?In the United states, this refers to the establishment in which alcoholic beverages and tobacco are permitted to be retailed and consumed.
Because, in California, businesses are legal authorized to sell alcoholic beverages, they must be in possession of a liquor license and these licenses issued by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
However, there can be a grounds to suspend or revoke the license if there are Frequent calls for law enforcement assistance at an ABC-licensed premises.
Read more about ABC licensed premises
brainly.com/question/27999242
#SPJ1
who is the Ugandan nominee to the International Criminal Court
Dominic Ongwen declared guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Uganda
Different between citizen and alien
Explanation:
A citizen is a permanent resident of a state, while an alien is a temporary resident, who comes for a specific duration of time as a tourist or on diplomatic assignment
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. on June 30, (2022).
What does it mean when the Supreme court vacates and remands a case?The Supreme Court of the United States may grant a petition for certiorari, reverse a lower court's ruling, and remand the matter for additional proceedings in a grant, vacate, and remand order (GVR order) (hence the acronym by which they are known). Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. on June 30, (2022).
The Supreme Court simply sends the case back to the lower court to be reconsidered in light of the new law or the new precedent, which is usually appropriate when there has been a change in the legal circumstances since the lower court's or agency's decision, such as a change in the law, a precedential ruling, or a confession of error. Because GVR orders are intended to be quick and simple, they do not fully explain the law and do not set any precedents. Long opinions are typically not used to explain GVR orders.The Supreme Court of the United States may grant a petition for certiorari, reverse a lower court's ruling, and remand a matter for additional proceedings in a grant, vacate, and remand order (GVR order).Learn more about grant, vacate, and remand here:
https://brainly.com/question/2033587
#SPJ4
Level grade engineering, inc. , sometimes uses explosives to prepare land for construction projects. Strict liability is imposed on this activity because.
Answer: It is complicated and Permanent
Explanation:
often when this type of engineering is competed it is very hard to redo it
Strict liability is imposed on this activity because the activity is of a dangerous nature. The right response is Option C.
Using Explosives is extremely risky, In order to keep everyone who is involved to be protected, certain safety measures are taken.
Why using explosives is a dangerous activity?It causes following effects.
Impact / friction.Fire / heat.Fragment attack / overpressure.Electrostatic discharge.Electromagnetic radiation such as mobile phones, pagers (in the case of electro-explosive devices)Chemical reaction.Accidental fires and explosions may have catastrophic impacts on human lives, property damage, the environment, and business continuity. Because of the danger of fire and explosion, handling flammable liquids, dusts, gases, and solids should be done with caution.
Therefore, Strict liability is imposed on the activity.
To know more about Explosives, check the given links.
https://brainly.com/question/14891420
https://brainly.com/question/27251731
#SPJ4
Correct Question - Level Grade Engineering, Inc., sometimes uses explosives to prepare land for construction projects. Strict liability is imposed on this activity because
a. Level Grade is a corporation.
b. the activity is inherently negligent.
c. the activity is extremely risky.
d. the amount of liability can be added to the costs of construction.
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system? Explain.
The criminal justice system's goals are to defend society, deal with offenders, and rehabilitate criminals.
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system?It accomplishes this by having the culprit be arrested and put on trial for their crimes. If found guilty, they face jail time or additional penalties including fines or community service.
Police-based services offer crucial support to crime victims, such as on-site crisis intervention and arranging for emergency medical care. A victim's short- and long-term rebuilding may also benefit from the information and referrals provided by law enforcement programs to services and resources.
Learn more about criminal justice system here
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
This law makes it illegal to submit a falsified bill to a government agency and applies to healthcare because medicare is a government agency.
This Federal False Claims Act law makes it illegal to submit a falsified bill to a government agency and applies to healthcare because medicare is a government agency.
The Federal False Claims Prevention Act is the US government's primary anti-fraud measure. This allows whistleblowers to sue individuals or organizations that deceive the government and seek damages and penalties on the government's behalf.
Payment for services not provided or products not provided. Misrepresenting services offered or products offered (improper coding); misrepresenting the nature of a patient's condition (IPPS and OPPS fraud); In short, the False Claims Act makes those who know (or should know) a false claim filed with the federal government liable. An example might be submitting a bill to Medicare for a medical service that you know your doctor doesn't provide.
Learn more about False Claims here: https://brainly.com/question/7343755
#SPJ1
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
suppose x is a normally distributed random variable with mean 11 and standard deviation 2. find each of the following probabilities
The probabilities of each of the following are:
mu = 11, sigma = 2
We convert this to standard regular as
P( X < x) = P( Z < x - mu / sigma)
a)P( X >= 14) = P( Z >= 14 - 11 / 2)
= P( Z >= 1.5)
= 1 - P( Z < 1.5)
= 1 - 0.9332
=0.0668
b)P( X <= 85) = P (Z <= 8.5 - 11 / 2)
= P( Z <= -1.25)
= 1 - P( Z < 1.25)
= 1 - 0.8944
= 0.1056
c)P( 11.6 <= X <= 15.54) = P( X <= 15.54) - P( X <= 11.6)
= P( Z <= 15.54 - 11 / 2) - P( Z <= 11.6 - 11 / 2)
= P( Z <= 2.27) - P( Z <= 0.3)
= 0.9884 - 0.6179
= 0.3705
d)P( 6.4 <= X <= 14.4) = P( X <= 14.4) - P( X <= 6.4)
= P( Z <= 14.4 - 11 / 2) - P( Z <= 6.4 - 11 / 2)
= P( Z <= 1.7) - P( Z <= -2.3)
= 0.9554 - ( 1 - 0.9893)
= 0.9447
The opportunity of an event can be calculated with the aid of probability components by truly dividing the favorable number of consequences by using the entire wide variety of viable outcomes.
The probabilities are the branch of mathematics regarding numerical descriptions of how probably an event is to arise, or how possibly it's miles that a proposition is real. The chance of an event is a range of between 0 and 1, in which, roughly speaking, 0 indicates the impossibility of the occasion and 1 indicates certainty.
Three Types of Probability
Classical: (equally probable outcomes) Let S=sample space (set of all possible distinct outcomes). ...Relative Frequency Definition. ...Subjective Probability.Learn more about the probabilities here: https://brainly.com/question/24756209
#SPJ1
Which Criminal Justice practitioner has the most in fluence over death penalty cases
Answer: The answer is false.
if you want to put a pool in your yard, you must check the _____
Answer:
SLOPE ....
YOU MUST CHECK THE SLOPE Before YOU PUT A POOL
At common law, if someone solicits, encourages, or commands another to offend, then they are a(n) ________.
Answer:
Accessory someone who gives assistance to the perpetrator of a crime, without directly committing it, sometimes without being present
Which of the following laws requires judges to recuse themselves from a case if they have received campaign contributions from one of the parties involved in the case
Answer:
Judicial Campaign Fairness Act
Explanation:
Judicial Campaign Fairness Act requires judges to recuse themselves from a case if they have received campaign contributions from one of the parties involved in the case. Thus, option C is correct.
The JCFA limits the period of time that judicial candidates may accept political donations and imposes voluntary expenditure constraints, contribution quotas, and time limits for judicial contests.
The Texas Judicial Campaign Fairness Act places a limit on how much money a judicial candidate may raise from a single source. A contingent fee is what a client pays the attorney only if the lawsuit is won. Condemning a court's ruling fairly is not considered contempt. If a person publishes a fair evaluation of a case's merits after it has been heard and decided, they are not in contempt of court.
Therefore, option C is the ideal selection.
Learn more about Judicial Campaign Fairness Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/31866533
#SPJ4
Your question seems to be incomplete, but most probably the complete question was:
Which of the following laws requires judges to recuse themselves from a case if they have received campaign contributions from one of the parties involved in the case?
a. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
b. Federal Election Campaign Act
c. Judicial Campaign Fairness Act
d. McCain-Feingold Act
The equal justice alliance established civil monetory penalties for the failure to report a suspicion of crime appropriately. True or false
The equal justice alliance established civil monetary penalties for the failure to report a suspicion of crime appropriately. True. This is further explained below.
What is an equal justice alliance?Generally, The Alliance for Equal Justice is a network of organizations that provides and supports civil legal assistance to low-income persons and communities as well as individuals and communities that are vulnerable and disenfranchised.
In conclusion, The Equal Justice Alliance was responsible for the establishment of civil monetary sanctions for failing to disclose a suspect of criminal activity in the right manner. True.
Read more about the equal justice alliance
https://brainly.com/question/15307135
#SPJ1