Look at this chart showing the economic impact of the Great Depression between 1929 and 1932.


According to this chart,
o Great Britain
- the United States
- Germany
- France
had the smallest increase in unemployment.

Answer:

teaching a profession

Explanation:

teaching is a profession so that human life can be continued and so that the upcoming generationcan be more advanced,easier and convenient.

Answer:

house of representatives and the senate

Explanation:

Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.

Answer:

Caesar August of Roman Empire

Answer:

Paper towels and bike tires

Explanation:

According to the chart, the two products that should be classified as imports are Paper towels and bike tires.

This is because, imports are those goods that are brought into a country and from the chart, paper towels and bike tires were imported while other items were exported.

Answer:

Hostility between white settlers and Native Americans deepened.

Explanation:

The effect of the battles fought on the western frontier during the American Revolution is Hostility between white settlers and Native Americans deepened."

During the American Revolutionary war, the majority of the native Americans allied with the British to fight against the Americans. As a result of this issue plus any other related incidences, the hostile relations between white settlers and Native Americans deepened

Answer:

C. to limit the manufacturing of missiles

Explanation:

SALT =

Strategic Arms Limitation Talks Agreement

(wikipedia)

Answer:

The answer is C.

Explanation:

Answer:

Contexto.

Explanation:

En lingüística y teoría de la comunicación, el contexto denota todos los elementos de una situación de comunicación que ayudan a determinar la comprensión de un enunciado, es decir, el "contexto del uso de una palabra" para la respectiva situación del habla. Además, el contexto generalmente se refiere al contexto en el que debe entenderse un enunciado, una acción o una señal en general, es decir, a las situaciones fácticas que rodean a dicha enunciación

Answer: Military

Explanation:

Answer: It proves that African Americans did not want to be enslaved and that they tried to end it.

Explanation:

The South had maintained that African Americans actually liked slavery and would be unable to survive without it. They actively promoted this view but these slave revolts show that this wasn't the case. Why would people revolt against something that they don't mind.

It shows that not only were African Americans against being enslaved, but that they actively sought to end it by any means necessary. It is therefore important to learn about these revolts as it shows how slavery was resisted by people even when thy faced dire consequences for doing so.

Answer:

A. He expanded direct democracy to new classes of free men.

Answer:

the answer D. both were launched because of the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union

Explanation:

One major similarity between the Marshall Plan and the Molotov Plan is that they both were launched because of the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union. Hence, Option D is correct.

When a plan was made by the US, the aim of the plan is to provide help to the area of the Western Europe which was devastated because of the Second World War. That plan is known as Marshall Plan or the European Recovery Program. By providing a financial help of more that $15 billion, the plan was came into force in the year of 1948.

Basically, aid was provided so that the continent can be rebuilt. Just like all other plans, it also has aims. The first aim was to prevent the Western Europe from the spread of the communism and second aim was to stabalize and make the conditions favorable so that the development of political democracy and free-market economies will be possible in the international market.

Thus, Option D is correct.

Learn more about Molotov Plan from here:

https://brainly.com/question/9159967

#SPJ5

Every year a few hundred naturalized citizens lose their citizenship because they have committed federal crimes. The  citizenship and domestic powers are involved.

A person who was born outside of the country and acquired citizenship in the country is known as a naturalized citizen. Only immigrants who have been legally residing in the country for three to five years are eligible, as are those who have served in the military.

If you were born outside of the United States, you must go through the naturalization procedure in order to become a citizen. You can become a citizen of the United States either at birth or later in life if you meet specific qualifications. 

No state has the independent authority to convert a foreign subject into a citizen of the United States; Congress has the sole authority to carry out naturalizations. Citizenship by naturalization is a right that Congress may grant or deny.

To learn more about Citizenship

https://brainly.com/question/18099945

#SPJ2

Answer:

huh

Explanation:

Donald Trump’s election as the 45th President of the United States has been marked by the brewing storms of racial conflicts. A rise in racial incidents ensued in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory in November 2016. Since the beginning of 2017, over 100 bomb threats have been made against Jewish community centers and schools. Trump’s travel ban, signed in late January 2017, initially affected about 90,000 people from seven Middle Eastern countries; 87,000 of those banned were Muslims. Minorities such as American Muslims and black Americans have expressed fears over racial relations under Trump. Undeniably, the topic of race—and racism—has gripped America and the world throughout.

Over the last decade, there have been hopes that the US has become a post-racial society, free of racial prejudice and discrimination. However, the most recent months indicate the contrary: race remains an incendiary issue. Race and racism are not new issues, but in today’s 21st century Trump-era, discussions about race are distinct from those of the past in that they possess an entirely new dimension: that of genetics and DNA.

Race in the new era of human genetics research

In 2003, scientists completed the Human Genome Project, making it finally possible to examine human ancestry with genetics. Scientists have since tackled topics such as human migrations out of Africa and around the world. And it’s not just scientists who are excited about human genetics: widely affordable at-home ancestry test kits are now readily available from companies like 23andMe, Family Tree DNA, and Ancestry. For $99—around the price of a romantic dinner or a pair of Nikes—a customer can receive an analysis from 23andMe indicating that they are, for instance, 18.0% Native American, 65.1% European and 6.2% African.

The soaring popularity of ancestry testing bespeaks a widespread perception that we can use these tests to dissect, delineate, and define our ancestral composition. Indeed, social media is teeming with blog posts, and even livestream videos, from excited customers bursting to broadcast their test results and their reactions. Ancestry test kits are the new “it” item—and with their success is the tacit admission of our belief that our DNA can sort us into categories like the “five races:” African, European, Asian, Oceania, and Native American (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. ‘Race’ cannot be biologically defined due to genetic variation among human individuals and populations. (A) The old concept of the “five races:” African, Asian, European, Native American, and Oceanian. According to this view, variation between the races is large, and thus, the each race is a separate category. Additionally, individual races are thought to have a relatively uniform genetic identity. (B) Actual genetic variation in humans. Human populations do roughly cluster into geographical regions. However, variation between different regions is small, thus blurring the lines between populations. Furthermore, variation within a single region is large, and there is no uniform identity.  

Figure 1: ‘Race’ cannot be biologically defined due to genetic variation among human individuals and populations. (A) The old concept of the “five races:” African, Asian, European, Native American, and Oceanian. According to this view, variation between the races is large, and thus, the each race is a separate category. Additionally, individual races are thought to have a relatively uniform genetic identity. (B) Actual genetic variation in humans. Human populations do roughly cluster into geographical regions. However, variation between different regions is small, thus blurring the lines between populations. Furthermore, variation within a single region is large, and there is no uniform identity.

New findings in genetics tear down old ideas about race

Estimating our ancestral composition down to 0.1% seem to suggest that there are exact, categorical divisions between human populations. But reality is far less simple. Compared to the general public’s enthusiasm for ancestry testing, the reaction from scientists has been considerably more lukewarm. Research indicates that the concept of “five races” does, to an extent, describe the way human populations are distributed among the continents—but the lines between races are much more blurred than ancestry testing companies would have us believe (Figure 1B).

A landmark 2002 study by Stanford scientists examined the question of human diversity by looking at the distribution across seven major geographical regions of 4,000 alleles. Alleles are the different “flavors” of a gene. For instance, all humans have the same genes that code for hair: the different alleles are why hair comes in all types of colors and textures.

Answer:

The Watson Commission reported that the 1946 constitution was inappropriate from the start, because it did not address the concerns of the natives of the Gold Coast. It also recommended that the Gold Coast be allowed to draft its own constitution.

Explanation:

Answer:

no no food's tastes bad in us

Answer:

C. Limits on immigration

Explanation:

A.P.E.X

Limits on immigration  of the 1920s best explains the statistics in this table. Thus, option C is correct.

On May 6, 1882, President Chester A. Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act, a federal statute that forbade the entry of any Chinese labourers for ten years. Merchants, educators, students, travellers, and diplomats were not covered by the statute. The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first and only significant U.S. statute enacted to bar all members of a particular national group from entering the country.

Growing anti-Chinese sentiment and violence, as well as other measures that targeted Chinese immigration, preceded the law's passage. The Angell Treaty of 1880, a set of amendments to the U.S.-China Burlingame Treaty of 1868 that permitted the U.S. to halt Chinese immigration, was followed by the legislation.

Learn more about The Chinese Exclusion Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/29112761

#SPJ7

Answer:

I think Barack Obama will be remembered as the first African-American ever to be elected president of the United States.

TRhe aspect of the 2008 election thatwould be remembered years from now is that Obama was the first black President of the United States.

This man became the 44th president of the United States. He is a democrat and stayed in office for two terms. From 2009 to 2017.

His election into office is historical because he broke the race barrier in the country. He is the nation's first black president.

Read more on Obama here: https://brainly.com/question/1125105

#SPJ2

Answer:

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution. These amendments guarantee essential rights and civil liberties, such as the right to free speech and the right to bear arms, as well as reserving rights to the people and the states.

i think b is the correct answer

Answer:

it is A as every musical score has 3 musical elements that contribute to the quality of the song

Explanation:

Answer:

Characteristics of imperialism and revolution are related because both demand loyalty to the state. Revolution is over thrown of government in favor of a new system. Imperialism is forceful takeover of government. ... Thus,imperialism and revolution demand loyalty to the state.

Answer: They are called Revolutionary nationalism and they take place when the whole country is in a revolutionary war. Also may I have the brainest.

Answer:

it rejected the massachusetts government act and resolved on a boycott of imported goods from britain unless the intolerable acts were repealed

A boycott of all British trade, the raising of troops, and the purchase of arms and ammunition.

Answer:

don't know

Explanation:

don't knowg fzfxfctctzrxhffxgkfzkx

Answer:

kansas

Explanation:

"self-determination was called popular sovereignty.

In Kansas, people on all sides of this controversial issue flooded the territory, trying to influence the vote in their favor.

Rival territorial governments, election fraud, and squabbles over land claims all contributed to the violence of this era"

nps

Answer:

i don't know this question

Answer:

The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.

Explanation:

When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.

However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.

Answer:

Upper

Explanation:

At the end of the seventeenth century, the German Pietists had supported the development of a new spirit within Lutheranism. Leaders of this movement—men like Philipp Jakob Spener and August Hermann Francke—advocated a religion that spoke to the heart rather than the mind.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

Leads to lower prices

Explanation:

GP