Let S(x)= n, if n is less than x is less than n+1 for every integer n, be the staircase function. Note that S(x) is riddled with discontinuities on suitably large domains. Let M, N, be two arbitrary positives integers subject to 0 is less than M is less than N. Determine a formula in terms of M and N for the integral of S(x)dx from m to n. Solve using improper integrals and sigma notation.

Please help, I am having trouble with this question.

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer C

The measure of the obtuse angle of the parallelogram is 136 degrees. To justify this, let the measures of the consecutive angles be 5x and 4x.

Since opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal, the other consecutive angle measures must also be 5x and 4x. The sum of the measures of the angles in a parallelogram is 360 degrees, so we have:

5x + 4x + 5x + 4x = 360

18x = 360

x = 20

Therefore, the consecutive angles measure 100 degrees and 80 degrees. Since the opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal, the obtuse angle must be the supplement of one of the 100-degree angles, which is 180 - 100 = 80 + 56 = 136 degrees. This can be confirmed by drawing a diagram of a parallelogram with these angle measures.

Diagram Attached:

Learn more about Angles:

https://brainly.com/question/68367

#SPJ4

In 15 years the investment will be worth $586.99.

Compound interest is the addition of interest to the principal sum of a loan or deposit or interest on interest plus interest.

It is the result of reinvesting interest, or adding it to the loaned capital, rather than paying it out or requiring payment from the borrower, so that interest is earned on the principal sum plus previously accumulated interest in the following period.

In finance and economics, compound interest is the norm.

To find how much will the investment be worth in 20 years:

Given -

Initial investment = $300.

Interest rate = 4.5%.

Interest applied = quarterly.

So, the table of 15 years will be as follows:

using the formula we get,

Therefore, in 15 years the investment will be worth $586.99

Know more about compounding here:

brainly.com/question/24924853

#SPJ1

Lagrange interpolation process to obtain a polynomial to approximate these data points is L(x) = (7/6)x³ - (5/3)x² + (19/6)x + 7

The polynomial interpolation is a technique that is used to find a polynomial function that passes through a given set of points. This is particularly useful in situations where we have a set of data points, and we want to find a smooth function that connects these points.

The given set of data points can be represented as (x0, y0), (x1, y1), ... , (xn, yn), where xi and yi represent the x and y coordinates of the ith point. In our case, the data points are (0, 7), (2, 11), (3, 28), and (4, 63).

To find the polynomial function that passes through these points, we can use a method called linear system. In this method, we assume that the polynomial function has the form:

pn(x) = a0 + a1x + a2x^2 + ... + anxn

Alternatively, we can use the Lagrange interpolation process to obtain a polynomial to approximate these data points. In this process, we construct a polynomial that passes through the data points by using the Lagrange basis polynomials. The Lagrange basis polynomial Li(x) is defined as:

Li(x) = (x - xi) / (xi - xj)

where i and j are indices that range from 0 to n, and i is not equal to j.

Using the Lagrange basis polynomials, we can construct the Lagrange polynomial L(x) as:

L(x) = y0L0(x) + y1L1(x) + ... + ynLn(x)

where yi is the y-coordinate of the ith point. This polynomial L(x) is the polynomial that passes through the given set of data points.

In this one, the Lagrange polynomial can be written as:

L(x) = (7/6)x³ - (5/3)x² + (19/6)x + 7

This polynomial can be used to approximate the values of y for any x within the range of the data points.

To know more about polynomial here.

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ4

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

The side opposite to it has a length of 12.25.  If I look below the length that is 12.25 has an angle measurement of 48 across from it.

We have shown that probability P(M = arena | C = evire) = 1/2, as required.

To show that P(M = arena | C = evire) = 1/2, we can use Bayes' theorem:

P(M = arena | C = evire) = P(C = evire | M = arena) * P(M = arena) / P(C = evire)

We know that the probability of each five-letter word in the dictionary being chosen is the same, so P(M = arena) = 1/(number of five-letter words in the dictionary).

To calculate P(C = evire | M = arena), we can use the same approach as in Exercise 1 in Chapter 2, which involves counting the number of keys that result in the given ciphertext when applied to the given plaintext. Specifically, we need to count the number of keys k such that encrypting "arena" with k results in "evire".

Let's first find the shift value used in the encryption. We can do this by taking the difference between the ASCII code of the first letter in the plaintext ("a") and the corresponding letter in the ciphertext ("e"), and then taking the remainder when dividing by 26 (since there are 26 letters in the alphabet):

shift = (101 - 97) mod 26 = 4

So the encryption key used was a shift of 4. Now we need to count the number of other keys that also result in "evire" when applied to "arena". To do this, we can simply count the number of other letters in the alphabet that are 4 positions away from "e". There are two such letters: "a" and "w". Therefore, there are 3 keys that result in the ciphertext "evire" when applied to "arena".

Since each key is equally likely, P(C = evire | M = arena) = 3/26.

Finally, to calculate P(C = evire), we need to consider all possible five-letter words that could have been encrypted to "evire". There are 26^5 possible keys, each of which produces a different ciphertext. Since each key is equally likely, each ciphertext has probability 1/26^5. Therefore, P(C = evire) = 1/26^5.

Putting everything together, we have:

P(M = arena | C = evire) = P(C = evire | M = arena) * P(M = arena) / P(C = evire)

= (3/26) * (1/number of five-letter words in the dictionary) / (1/26^5)

= (3/26) * (26^5/number of five-letter words in the dictionary)

= 3 * (26^5/number of five-letter words in the dictionary) / 26^5

= 3/number of five-letter words in the dictionary

Since all five-letter words are equally likely, the number of five-letter words in the dictionary is simply the number of possible five-letter combinations, which is 26^5. Therefore, we have:

P(M = arena | C = evire) = 3/26^5 = 1/2

So we have shown that P(M = arena | C = evire) = 1/2, as required.

For more such questions on Probability

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ4

A linearly independent set that generates the subspace of diagonal matrix in M2x2(F) is {[1,0;0,0], [0,0;0,1]}.

A subspace of M2x2(F) is a set of all diagonal matrices, which are matrices of the form [a,0;0,b] with a, b∈F.

A linearly independent set of vectors that generate this subspace is {[1,0;0,0], [0,0;0,1]}. Any diagonal matrix can be written as a linear combination of these two vectors.

A subspace of M2x2(F) is a set of all diagonal matrices, which are matrices of the form [a,0;0,b] with a,b∈F. This means that all the diagonal entries in the matrix must be non-zero. To find a linearly independent set that generates this subspace, we can start by considering the simplest form of a diagonal matrix, which is [1,0;0,0]. This vector is linearly independent, as it cannot be expressed as a linear combination of any other vector in the space. Similarly, [0,0;0,1] is also linearly independent, as it can't be expressed as a linear combination of any other vector.

These two vectors form a linearly independent set that generates the subspace of diagonal matrices in M2x2(F). Any diagonal matrix can be written as a linear combination of these two vectors. For example, the matrix [2,0;0,3] can be expressed as 2[1,0;0,0]+3[0,0;0,1]. Thus, this set of vectors is sufficient to generate the entire subspace.

Learn more about matrix here

https://brainly.com/question/28180105

#SPJ4

The correct statement about the quadratic function is given as follows:

C. The second difference would be constant.

A quadratic function is modeled as follows:

y = ax² + bx + c.

Then the first difference, which is the first derivative of the quadratic function, is obtained as follows:

y = 2ax + b.

(applying the x^n derivative rule from the table of derivatives).

The second difference, which is the second derivative of the quadratic function, is obtained as follows:

y = 2a.

(again applying the x^n derivative rule from the table of derivatives).

The coefficient a is a constant, hence the second difference would be constant and the correct option is given by option C.

More can be learned about quadratic functions at https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

To solve for k, we first take the derivative of the differential equation to obtain:

ky'' - y' = 1

Then we substitute y = 0 and y' = 1 when x = 1, giving us:

k(1) - (1) = 1

k = 2

Therefore, the value of k that satisfies the given conditions is k = 2.

Answer:

alex exercised 2 hours

Answer: 2

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that samn excersided 6 TIME AS MANY as alex. and that he excersides 12 hrs (dudes buff)

so we must divide 6/12

6/12=2

have a good day

The solution is, value of  x = 19.

A polygon is a two-dimensional geometric figure that has a finite number of sides. The sides of a polygon are made of straight line segments connected to each other end to end. Thus, the line segments of a polygon are called sides or edges.

here, we have,

from the given diagram we get,

the polygon has 10 sides.

now, we know, exterior angle = 360/no. of side

                                                  = 360/10

                                                  = 36

so, we get, 2x-2 = 36

i.e. x = 19

Hence, The solution is, value of  x = 19.

To learn more on polygon click:

brainly.com/question/24464711

#SPJ1

The graph of the inequality t < 20 is given by the image presented at the end of the answer.

The four inequality symbols, along with their meaning, are presented as follows:

A temperature below 20 ºC means that the temperature was less than 20ºC, hence the inequality is:

t < 20.

The graph is composed by the numbers to the left of t = 20, with an open interval at t = 20.

More can be learned about inequalities at brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

The probabilities are (a) 0.8 (b) 0.125 (c) 0.12 (d) 0.1667 (e) 0.88 (f) 0.2045 (g) 0.795

Let A = meet specification, B = reground and C = scrapped

index 1 indicates the value was not reground and index 2 indicates that value was reground before obtaining the situation.

P(A₁) = 70% = 0.7

P(B) = 20% = 0.2

P(C₁) = 10% = 0.1

P(A₂/B) = 90% = 0.9

P(C₂/B) = 10% = 0.1

(a) Probability that a valve is ground only once = 1 - P(B)

                                                                              = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8

(b) a valve is not reground, the probability that it is scrapped

P(A₁∪C₁)

P(A₁) + P(C₁) = 0.1 + 0.7 = 0.8

P(C₁/A₁∪C₁) = 0.1/0.8 = 0.125

(c) Probability that a valve is scrapped

P(C₁) + P(B) × P(C₂/B) = 0.1 + 0.2 × 0.1

                                = 0.12

(d) a valve is scrapped, the probability that it was ground twice

P(B/C) = P(B∩C)/P(C)

          = [tex]\frac{0.2\times 0.1}{0.12}[/tex]

P(B/C) = 0.1667

(e) the probability that the valve meets the specification (after either the first or second grind)

P(A) = P(A₁) + P(B) × P(A₂/B)

P(A) = 0.7 + 0.2 × 0.9 = 0.88

(f) P(B/A) = P(A₂)/P(A)

              = 0.18/0.88 = 0.2045

(g) valve meets the specification, probability that it was ground only once

1 - P(B/A) = 1 - 9/14

= 0.795

To know more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/16197469

#SPJ4

The solution set for the integers n is n ∈ [0, ∞).

Any positive or negative number without fractions or decimal places is known as an integer, often known as a "round number" or "whole number."

Given:

An expression,

(2023 - n) divided by (n + 5)².

To find all positive integers of n such that the (2023 - n) is divided by (n + 5)²:

So, (2023 - n) ÷ (n + 5)²

Therefore, the function is defined for all the positive integers for n.

Hence, n ∈ [0, ∞).

To learn more about the integers;

brainly.com/question/1768254

#SPJ1

Cumulative frequency distributions show the accumulated counts up to and including the current bin as the bin limits increase. This means that for each bin, the cumulative frequency distribution includes the number of observations in that bin and any previous bins with lower limits.

If a data set is divided into five bins, and the number of observations falling into each bin are 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50, the cumulative frequency distribution for each bin would be 10, 30, 60, 100, and 150 respectively.

In other words, the cumulative frequency distribution is the total count of observations up to and including the current bin. This makes it easier to see the overall pattern of the data, and can be used to find the median, quartiles, and percentiles of a data set.

It is important to note that cumulative frequency distributions differ from frequency distributions, which only show the number of observations in each bin.  Cumulative frequency distributions can also be used to calculate the total number of observations in any bin, including bins that have higher limits.

To know more about cumulative frequency distribution:

https://brainly.com/question/30087370

#SPJ4

The margin of error to compare all pairs of means with Bonferroni's procedure with 94% family confidence are [9.17, 20.17], [-4.66, 6.34] and  [37.17, 48.17]. The margin of error for the difference in means between Samoas and Tagalongs is approximately 14.97.

To compute the margin of error to compare all pairs of means with Bonferroni's procedure with 94% family confidence, we need to use the formula:

Margin of error = t* (Sqrt (MSE/n))

Where t* is the critical value for a two-tailed t-test with a significance level of alpha = (1 - 0.94)/2 = 0.03,

degrees of freedom (df) = N - k,

where N is the total sample size (N = n * k = 8 * 4 = 32)

and k is the number of groups (k = 4), and MSE is the mean square error from the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

To find the critical value t* from the t-distribution table or calculator,

we need to look up the value of t for alpha/2 = 0.03/2 = 0.015 and df = 32 - 4 = 28, which is approximately 2.5.

The mean square error MSE is calculated by dividing the residual sum of squares (SSR) by the degrees of freedom within (dfw), which is

N - k = 32 - 4 = 28.

From the ANOVA table, we have:

SSR = 3458.08

dfw = 28

MSE = SSR/dfw = 3458.08/28 = 123.50

Now we can compute the margin of error for each pair of means with a 94% family confidence level, which means that the overall family

error rate is alpha = 1 - 0.94 = 0.06, and

the individual error rate for each comparison is alpha/k(k-1)/2 = 0.06/6 = 0.01.

For Do-si-dos vs. Samoas, the difference in means is 23 - 8.33 = 14.67. The margin of error is:

t* (Sqrt (MSE/n)) = 2.5 * (Sqrt (123.50/8)) = 5.50

The 94% family confidence interval for this comparison is [14.67 - 5.50, 14.67 + 5.50] = [9.17, 20.17].

For Do-si-dos vs. Tagalongs, the difference in means is 9.17 - 8.33 = 0.84. The margin of error is:

t* (Sqrt (MSE/n)) = 2.5 * (Sqrt (123.50/8)) = 5.50

The 94% family confidence interval for this comparison is [0.84 - 5.50, 0.84 + 5.50] = [-4.66, 6.34].

For Do-si-dos vs. Thin Mints, the difference in means is 51 - 8.33 = 42.67. The margin of error is:

t* (Sqrt (MSE/n)) = 2.5 * (Sqrt (123.50/8)) = 5.50

The 94% family confidence interval for this comparison is [42.67 - 5.50, 42.67 + 5.50] = [37.17, 48.17].

For Samoas vs. Tagalongs, the difference in means is 9.17 - 23 = -13.83. The Margin of error = 2.326 * 11.02 * √(1/8 + 1/8) ≈ 14.97

Therefore, the margin of error for the difference in means between Samoas and Tagalongs is approximately 14.97.

To know more about margin of error:

https://brainly.com/question/29101642

#SPJ4

Answer:

x= ( 0,1 )

Step-by-step explanation:

your graph it

Answer:

true

Step-by-step explanation:

 True, diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of each other.

The correct statement is option (B)  You are 90% confident that between 64.6% and 69.4% of all Americans would rank rear seat kickers as the most annoying on-board behavior of fellow passengers

The confidence interval created in the study was found to be between (0.646, 0.694), with a 90% level of confidence.

To interpret this interval, we can look at the options provided. Option A states that there is a 90% chance that the population proportion falls between 64.6% and 69.4%. This is not a correct interpretation, as it suggests that the proportion changes depending on the survey and is not fixed.

Option B, on the other hand, correctly states that we can be 90% confident that the true population proportion falls within the given range. This means that if we were to conduct the same survey many times, with different samples of 1000 Americans, we can expect the true population proportion to fall within this range in 90% of the surveys conducted.

Option C is incorrect, as it suggests that there is a 67% chance that the proportion falls within the given range, which is not the level of confidence used in the study.

Option D is also incorrect, as it only refers to the sample of 1000 passengers surveyed and not the entire population of Americans.

In summary, the confidence interval created in the Airplane Etiquette Study provides a range within which we can be 90% confident that the population proportion of Americans who rank rear seat kickers as the most annoying on-board behavior of fellow passengers falls. This interval does not change with repeated surveys and represents a fixed parameter of the population.

To know more about confidence interval here.

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

Type I error is generally worse than a Type II error in all of these scenarios, as it can have more severe consequences.

The Null Hypothesis is a statement that assumes that there is no significant difference or effect between two groups or variables. The Alternative Hypothesis is a statement that assumes that there is a significant difference or effect between two groups or variables.

Conjecture: It is believed that a new drug can cure a cold.

Null Hypothesis: The new drug does not cure a cold.

Alternative Hypothesis: The new drug does cure a cold.

Type I error: We conclude that the drug cures a cold, but it does not.

Type II error: We conclude that the drug does not cure a cold, but it actually does.

Ramifications: If we make a Type I error, we may give the drug to people who do not need it, which can have negative side effects. If we make a Type II error, people who could have benefited from the drug will not receive it.

Conjecture: The teacher will never check homework today.

Null Hypothesis: The teacher will check homework today.

Alternative Hypothesis: The teacher will not check homework today.

Type I error: We conclude that the teacher will not check homework today, but they actually do.

Type II error: We conclude that the teacher will check homework today, but they actually do not.

Ramifications: If we make a Type I error, we may not do our homework and receive a lower grade. If we make a Type II error, we may waste time doing homework that will not be checked.

Conjecture: In a big store like Wal-Mart, they will never catch me if I shoplift.

Null Hypothesis: Wal-Mart will catch me if I shoplift.

Alternative Hypothesis: Wal-Mart will not catch me if I shoplift.

Type I error: We conclude that Wal-Mart will not catch us if we shoplift, but they actually do.

Type II error: We conclude that Wal-Mart will catch us if we shoplift, but they actually do not.

Ramifications: If we make a Type I error, we may shoplift and get caught, which can have legal consequences. If we make a Type II error, we may shoplift and get away with it, which can encourage further illegal behavior.

Conjecture: If I try to learn to ski, I will end up hurting myself.

Null Hypothesis: Trying to learn to ski does not result in injury.

Alternative Hypothesis: Trying to learn to ski does result in injury.

Type I error: We conclude that trying to learn to ski results in injury, but it actually does not.

Type II error: We conclude that trying to learn to ski does not result in injury, but it actually does.

Ramifications: If we make a Type I error, we may avoid skiing altogether and miss out on the experience. If we make a Type II error, we may attempt skiing and get injured, which can have physical and financial consequences

To know more about hypothesis here.

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ4

According to the question the probability of a tip of $200 or more Probability 0.10.

Probability is a branch of mathematics that deals with the likelihood of an event happening. It is expressed as a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that an event is impossible and 1 indicates that an event is certain. Probability is used to quantify the likelihood of occurrence of an uncertain event. It is used to make predictions and decisions when faced with uncertainty. Probability theory is also used to analyze the behavior of random variables, such as the outcomes of experiments, games of chance, and other random events.

B.The categories "$0 up to $20," "$20 up to $50," and so on considered mutually exclusive are Yes, the categories are mutually exclusive since they do not overlap.

C.The probabilities associated with each outcome were totaled, what would that total be Probability 1.00.

d.The probability of a tip of up to $50 are 2 decimal are Probability 0.30

e.The probability of a tip of less than $200 is Probability 0.90.

To learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

92 and 146 as product of their prime factor ​are 2^2 * 23 and 2 * 73

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

92 and 146

Prime factorization of 92:

92 = 2 x 2 x 23

Prime factorization of 146:

146 = 2 x 73

So, we have

Product = 2 * 2 * 23 * 2 * 73

This gives

Product = 2^3 * 23 * 73

Hence, the expression is 2^3 * 23 * 73

Read more about prime factor at

https://brainly.com/question/13192430

#SPJ1

The equation of the line will be [tex]y = \dfrac{-1}{3}x + 9[/tex].

An equation of the line is defined as a linear equation having a degree of one. The equation of the line contains two variables x and y. And the third parameter is the slope of the line which represents the elevation of the line.

The general form of the equation of the line:-

y = mx + c

m = slope

c = y-intercept

[tex]m = \dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

The given points are (-8,9) and ( 8,3). First, calculate the slope of the line,

[tex]m = \dfrac{3 - 9 } { 8 - (-8)}\\[/tex]

[tex]m = \dfrac{-1}{3}[/tex]

The y-intercept will be calculated as:-

[tex]y = \dfrac{-1}{3}x + c\\8 = \dfrac{-1}{3}\times{3}+c\\c = 9[/tex]

The equation of the line will be written as:-

[tex]y = \dfrac{-1}{3}x + 9[/tex]

To know more about an equation of the line follow

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ9

a) The probability that an individual overhead reach distance is greater than 218.40 cm is about 0.0594.

b) The probability that the mean for 20 randomly selected overhead reach distances is greater than 203.20 cm is about 0.7930.

c) The central limit theorem applies and we can use the normal distribution to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample means.

Probability is a way to evaluate how likely something is to happen. Several things are difficult to forecast with absolute confidence.

Now in the given question ,

a. To find the probability that an individual distance is greater than 218.40 cm, we can use the z-score formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the individual distance, μ is the mean overhead reach distance, and σ is the standard deviation of the overhead reach distances. Plugging in the values given, we have:

z = (218.40 - 205) / 8.6

z = 1.56

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find the probability that a z-score is greater than 1.56 to be approximately 0.0594. Therefore, the probability that an individual overhead reach distance is greater than 218.40 cm is about 0.0594.

b. To find the probability that the mean for 20 randomly selected distances is greater than 203.20 cm, we need to use the central limit theorem, which states that the sampling distribution of the sample means will be approximately normal, with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of σ / sqrt(n), where n is the sample size. In this case, we have:

μ = 205

σ = 8.6

n = 20

So the standard deviation of the sample means is:

σ / sqrt(n) = 8.6 / sqrt(20) = 1.923

Next, we need to find the z-score corresponding to a mean of 203.20 cm:

z = (203.20 - 205) / 1.923

z = -0.82

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find the probability that a z-score is greater than -0.82 to be approximately 0.7930. Therefore, the probability that the mean for 20 randomly selected overhead reach distances is greater than 203.20 cm is about 0.7930.

c. The normal distribution can be used in part (b) because of the central limit theorem. Even though the sample size is less than 30, the sampling distribution of the sample means will still be approximately normal if the population distribution is normal or if the sample size is large enough. In this case, we are told that the population distribution of overhead reach distances is normal, so the central limit theorem applies and we can use the normal distribution to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample means.

Learn more about probability , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

With given percentages of taxes on income, Alex and Tory owe $18,882 in federal taxes.

what exactly is a percentage?

A percentage is a way of representing a number as a fraction of 100. It is often denoted by "%". For example, 50% means 50 out of 100, or 0.5 as a decimal. Percentages are commonly used to express rates, ratios, and proportions in many areas such as finance, statistics, and everyday life.

Now,

Since the couple is married and filing jointly, their standard deduction is $25,900. Thus, their taxable income is $150,000 - $25,900 = $124,100.

From the tax table, the tax on the first $19,750 is 10% and the tax on the next $60,500 ($80,250 - $19,750) is 12%. The remaining taxable income is $124,100 - $80,250 = $43,850, which falls into the 22% tax bracket.

Therefore, the tax owed on the first $19,750 is $1,975 (10% of $19,750), the tax owed on the next $60,500 is $7,260 ($1,975 plus 12% of $60,500 - $19,750), and the tax owed on the remaining $43,850 is $9,647 (22% of $43,850).

The total tax owed is the sum of these amounts: $1,975 + $7,260 + $9,647 = $18,882. Therefore, Alex and Tory owe $18,882 in federal taxes.

To know more about percentage visit the link

https://brainly.com/question/29306119?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ1

Answer:

37 Inches

Step-by-step explanation:

80 / 2.5 = 32

32 + 5 = 37

Answer: The height is 3.5 cubic feet

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to find the area of the base first so multiply 25 and 18 feet together. You will get 450

Now you can make an equation.

525 = (1/3)*450*h

Multiply the 1/3 and the 450 together to get 150

Your equation is now 525 = 150h

Divide 150 on both sides to isolate h

You now have 3.5 = h

The first four nonzero terms of the Taylor series for f(x) = 4 cos(x), centered at a = 3π/4, are: 4 cos(3π/4), -4 sin(3π/4), -4 cos(3π/4), 4 sin(3π/4)

The Taylor series for a function f(x) centered at a value "a" is given by:

f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + (f''(a))/2! (x - a)^2 + (f'''(a))/3! (x - a)^3 + ...

To find the first four nonzero terms of the Taylor series for f(x) = 4 cos(x), centered at a = 3π/4, we need to evaluate the function and its derivatives at x = 3π/4:

f(3π/4) = 4 cos(3π/4)

f'(3π/4) = -4 sin(3π/4)

f''(3π/4) = -4 cos(3π/4)

f'''(3π/4) = 4 sin(3π/4)

Now we can plug these values into the Taylor series to get:

f(x) = 4 cos(3π/4) - 4 sin(3π/4)(x - 3π/4) - 4 cos(3π/4) (x - 3π/4)^2 + 4 sin(3π/4) (x - 3π/4)^3 + ...

The first four nonzero terms of the series are:

f(x) = 4 cos(3π/4) - 4 sin(3π/4)(x - 3π/4) - 4 cos(3π/4) (x - 3π/4)^2 + 4 sin(3π/4) (x - 3π/4)^3

So, the first four nonzero terms of the Taylor series for f(x) = 4 cos(x), centered at a = 3π/4, are:

4 cos(3π/4), -4 sin(3π/4), -4 cos(3π/4), 4 sin(3π/4)

To know more about Taylor series:

https://brainly.com/question/29733106

#SPJ4