Answer:
Double Jeopardy
Explanation:
If new video evidence is found after Jeff's initial trial that shows he did in fact commit the act of shoplifting, he could be brought to trial again for the same act. This is known as double jeopardy. In the United States, the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution protects against double jeopardy, but it applies only to criminal trials and not to civil trials. So, Jeff can be brought to trial again for the same act in a civil trial.
All criminal convictions in the USA must be:
a. brought to an appeals court to approve
b. are reviewed by the Governor for appropriateness
c. including a prison sentence
d. made by unanimous jury verdict
All criminal convictions in the USA must be made by unanimous jury verdict.
The correct answer to this is option D.
All criminal defendants in the US are entitled to a jury trial.
According to Recommendation 78, a jury's decision in criminal proceedings must continue to be made unanimously by the other jury members.
The right will be protected under the 6th Amendment. In both instances, judges rather than juries decide the outcome of a criminal case after a trial.
In criminal cases heard in federal courts, a jury must agree unanimously to find the defendant guilty. The judge, attorneys, and defendant are informed after a verdict has been reached.
The jury deliberates in a private chamber with the evidence after both sides in a trial have presented all of their evidence. The jury then decides on a decision and delivers it to the judge.
To know more about, jury verdict click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30087241
#SPJ4
match the correct laws to the examples in which they apply. use each law only once. drag the words in the left-hand column to the appropriate blanks in the right-hand column. mastering astronomy chapter 4
The laws and their applications are:
Kepler's second law of planetary motion explains why Earth's orbital speed varies over the course of each year.Newton's first law of motion explains why a spaceship with no forces acting on it will continue moving even if it has no fuel.Newton's third law of motion tells us that, when your are standing, the ground is pushing up on you with a force that precisely balances the downward force of your weight.Kepler's first law of planetary motion explains why Earth's distance from the Sun varies over the course of each year.What are scientific laws?Scientific laws or laws of science are propositions that explain or forecast a variety of natural occurrences and are based on repeated tests or observations. Throughout a variety of situations, the word "law" is used in all branches of natural science.
Read more on scientific laws here: https://brainly.com/question/1432753
#SPJ1
Who are some divorce lawyers in Dubai?
Answer: Typical legal fees for an amicable, uncontested divorce range from approximately Dh20,000 to Dh40,000. The costs of a divorce in the UAE are separate to negotiations in respect of reaching a financial settlement and any disputes relating to children.
Explanation:
What is the law of segregation in meiosis?
Rights that are specifically mentioned are referred to as enumerated rights; however, rights that are not specifically mentioned but that are regarded as essential to the functioning of the nation and the freedoms enjoyed by its citizens are also protected.
These are referred to as unenumerated or implied rights. Our Constitution, by Donald Ritchie.
What are some examples of enumerated powers?Some of these were: to lay out and get taxes; borrow money and pay off debts; regulate trade; the coin; erect postal facilities; safeguard copyrights and patents; reorganize the lower courts; wag a war; and support and raise an Army and Navy.
What are some examples of these rights that are not listed?Some of them were established by 100-year-old Supreme Court decisions. These include the right to travel within the country, the right to privacy, particularly in marriage, and the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
To learn more about enumerated rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1719867
#SPJ4
using genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves. although the use of ddt was banned in the united states in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average united states resident today would most likely reveal the presence of ddt because
DDT is a pesticide that was widely used in the past but is now banned in many countries, including the United States, because of its harmful effects on the environment and human health.
DDT and its breakdown products can persist in the environment for long periods of time, and they can accumulate in the body tissue of animals and humans.
Therefore, even though DDT was banned in the United States in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average United States resident today would most likely reveal the presence of DDT because of its persistence in the environment and its ability to bioaccumulate.
The use of genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves is an alternative method to control pests, it is not related to the presence of DDT in the body tissue.
To learn more about DDT
https://brainly.com/question/12651935
#SPJ4
the anti-federalists won a crucial promise for their passage of the new constitution. this was the addition of a _____ to the constitution.
The anti-federalists won a crucial promise for their passage of the new constitution. This was the addition of a Bill of Rights to the constitution.
The Federalists, who supported the Constitution, were the ones who won the crucial promise for the passage of the new Constitution.
The Federalists believed that a bill of rights was not necessary as they believed that the Constitution itself limited the power of the federal government and protected individual rights.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a bill of rights was essential in order to protect individual rights and liberties from government infringement. As a compromise to assure that the U.S. Constitution would be adopted by the required number of states, the Bill of Rights was inserted as the first 10 amendments in 1791.
To learn more about anti-federalists
https://brainly.com/question/29761963
#SPJ4
Name at least 3 characteristics of white street gangs
Answer:
1. Engagement in Illegal Activities: White street gangs often engage in illegal activities such as drug trafficking, robbery, and vandalism in order to generate income for the members.
2. Use of Identifying Symbols and Clothing: White street gangs will often use identifying symbols and clothing in order to signal their affiliation and to distinguish themselves from other gangs.
3. Strong Loyalty to Fellow Members: White street gangs will demonstrate great loyalty to their members and will stick together in order to protect their group and to gain respect in their community.
Also this applys to all gangs of all race's not just white gangs.
Participation in Illegal Activity. Use of Identifying Clothing and Symbols. High Loyalty to Other Members. Intimidation, drug trafficking, shootings, and occasionally murder are among the activities of White street gangs.
What do street gangs do?Numerous different kinds of organizations fall under the umbrella of gangs in the United States, including national street gangs, local street gangs, prison gangs, motorcycle clubs, and ethnic and organized crime gangs. Gangs are involved in a variety of illegal acts, including robbery, the selling of stolen goods, assault, burglary, drive-by shooting, extortion, homicide, identification fraud, money laundering, prostitution businesses, and trafficking in weapons. Local or international street gangs are also possible. The Latin Kings, Bloods, Crips, Gangster Disciples, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), and Tiny Rascals are just a few of these. Street gangs frequently engage in the distribution of drugs like cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine, and other illegal substances.
To know more about drug trafficking visit: brainly.com/question/16939546
#SPJ1
which of the following was a factor that contributed to the growth of nationalism in europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century?
Older identities being undermined as a result of Europe's modernization is one of the factors that contributed to the growth of nationalism in Europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century.
The transition to modernity began in the nations of northwest Europe, particularly in England, the Netherlands, northern France, and northern Germany, between the 16th and 18th centuries.
The 16th century had a significant period of economic growth. The numerous other changes—social, political, and cultural—of the early modern era were greatly influenced by this expansion.
According to Western European histories, the modern era began at the close of colonial invasion and early 19th-century worldwide expansion. In general, the time after the invention of modern warfare, which was characterized by two world wars and was followed by postmodernism, served as an example of modernity.
To learn more about Modernization in Europe, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15212797
#SPJ4
What is the scope of judicial review Class 10?
If a law or action of a local, state, or national government goes against the Constitution, judicial review can rule that it is invalid.
What is the judiciary's scope in India?India's judicial review under article 226 Article 226(1) states that any High Court in India's territorial jurisdiction is authorized to issue directives, orders, and writs to any person or authority, including the government, for the purpose of enforcing basic rights and other legal rights.
What role does the judiciary play in Class 10 India?The judiciary's primary responsibility is to uphold the rule of law and guarantee its supremacy. It ensures that democracy does not give way to individual or group dictatorship and that disputes are resolved in accordance with the law.
To learn more about judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
border patrol ten codes
Answer:
10-1. Receiving Poorly
10-2. Receiving Well
10-3. Disregard.
10-4. Acknowledged.
10-5. Be on the Lookout (BOLO)
10-6. Temporarily Busy.
10-7. Out of Service - Unavailable.
10-8. In service - Available.
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. What should the server do?
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. The server should reject the order of alcohol.
What is moral responsibility?The position of morally deserved praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission in conformity with one's moral responsibilities is known as moral responsibility in philosophy. An important question in ethics is what, if anything, constitutes a "morally obligatory" action. Moral agents are those who are held morally accountable for their actions.
Agents have the capacity to consider their circumstances, make plans for their actions, and then carry those plans out. In the discussion of whether or not people are ever ethically accountable for their acts and, if so, in what capacity, the concept of free will has emerged as a crucial topic. While compatibilists believe the two may coexist, incompatibilists believe that determinism and free will are incompatible.
Learn more about moral responsibility, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13792888
#SPJ2
How did the Anti-Federalists feel about presidential power?
The Anti-Federalists about presidential power tend to oppose the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution which is mainly because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and would threaten individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification while believing that the power should thus be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government. Thus, they tend to worry that a stronger federal government would be prone to tyranny.
However, this happened because these Anti-Federalists believed that this new Constitution did not include adequate protections which would be for the rights of the individuals and the states.
To learn more about the Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ4
A defendant was charged with conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. While on bail with travel restricted to his home state, he purchased an airplane ticket to another country by using an alias. At trial, the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence of the defendant’s ticket purchase. Should the court admit this evidence? A: No, because the evidence does not make any fact of consequence to the trial more or less probable than it would have been without the evidence. B: Yes, because the evidence is relevant both to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt and to show his motive to commit the crime. C: Yes, because the evidence is relevant to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt. D: Yes, because the evidence is relevant to show the defendant’s motive to commit the crime.
B: Yes, because the evidence is relevant both to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt and to show his motive to commit the crime.
The evidence of the defendant's ticket purchase is relevant because it suggests that the defendant was aware that he was under investigation and was trying to flee the country to avoid prosecution. This is known as "consciousness of guilt" and is admissible in court because it can be used to infer that the defendant knew they were committing a crime.
Additionally, the evidence of the defendant's ticket purchase is also relevant to show his motive to commit the crime, as it could suggest that the defendant was planning to flee in order to continue his illegal activities in another country.
Therefore, the court should admit this evidence as it is relevant to the case, and it makes the fact of the consequence of the trial more or less probable than it would have been without the evidence.
To learn more about prosecution Click
https://brainly.com/question/29970118
#SPJ4
What are two details regarding a certificate of deposit CD )?
Fixed Term Length. This is the first detail. This is the period when you accept leaving a certain amount of money deposited in order to avoid receiving a penalty. The period will end on the agreed date of maturity. This is when the certificate of deposit has matured and is ready to be withdrawn penalty free.
Fixed Date Of Withdrawal. This is the second detail, also known as the maturity date. After the period agreed upon ends, the account matures and the money is legible to be withdrawn now. One could choose to withdraw the whole amount or leave a little in the CD for another period of investment.
Consider reading more about certificate of deposit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29789676
#SPJ4
HUMAN RIGHTS. Based on UDHR, CEDAW, and CRC, Is there any right deprived to you? How do you feel? Who was responsible for its denial?
Based on the UDHR, CEDAW and CDC, there is no deprived right for me, however legally human, women's and children's rights can be fulfilled, we know that there is still a long way to go for greater social equity.
What is the UDHR?It corresponds to a document adopted by the United Nations in 1948 which attests to the set of inalienable rights of man, that is, the basic rights of any individual received at the time of his birth, such as the right to life, liberty and security. .
CEDAW corresponds to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, being an international treaty of the United Nations of 1979, which specifies the rights of women.
The CRC is the Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, the protection of all children on freedom from neglect, abuse and any type of violence.
Therefore, as much as such conventions are in force in most countries of the world, there are still many changes and efforts that need to be made so that every individual has a dignified life, with opportunities, education and development, this being a collective effort to be achieved.
Find out more about Human Rights on:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
How did the Munich Agreement affect Germany's actions?
The Munich Agreement, signed in 1938, had a significant impact on Germany's actions leading up to and during World War II. The agreement was an agreement between Germany, Britain, France, and Italy, in which they agreed to allow Germany to annex the Sudetenland, a region in Czechoslovakia with a large German-speaking population.
The Munich Agreement effectively gave in to one of Hitler's demands without any real resistance and it was a diplomatic failure as it led to further aggression by the German government. It was seen as a sign of weakness by the Nazis and encouraged them to pursue further territorial expansion. This led to the annexation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, and the invasion of Poland in September 1939, which ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II.
Additionally, the Munich Agreement also had a psychological effect on Hitler and the Nazi leadership. They saw it as a clear demonstration that the other European powers were unwilling to stand up to them and that they could continue to expand their territory without serious repercussions. This emboldened them to continue to pursue aggressive territorial expansion, leading to the outbreak of World War II.
Learn more about Munich Agreement here: https://brainly.com/question/25454285
#SPJ4
How old do you have to be to buy a handgun in texas?
Answer:
18 for private sell / 21 for a federally licensed dealer
Explanation:
true/false. an example of a government policy barrier to entry would be a scenario in which the antitrust division of the department of justice disallows a merger because it creates a firm that is too dominant and would thus create unfair competition
Yes, the above statement is true, a government policy barrier to entry would be a scenario to prevent unfair competition.
An impediment that prohibits or restricts the implementation of a specific policy instrument is known as a barrier. In extreme cases, these obstacles may cause some policy tools to be disregarded and result in significantly less effective solutions.
"Barriers to entry" is a word used in economics and business to describe elements that may prevent or make it difficult for newcomers to enter a market or industry area, hence limiting competition. These could consist of exorbitant startup costs, administrative impediments, or other obstacles that make it challenging for new competitors to enter a market. Entrance restrictions benefit existing enterprises since they maintain their market share and profitability.
Some typical entrance barriers are high switching costs, great brand recognition, strong patent protections, special tax incentives for established enterprises, and special brand incentives. Another impediment is the need for new firms to obtain licenses or regulatory clearance before opening.
To learn more about Barriers to Entry, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29656127
#SPJ4
Identify Central Issues Which groups would benefit from repealing the high tariffs known as the Corn Laws
Merchants and free traders stand to benefit from the repeal of the Corn Laws. This is because they would have larger markets to sell their goods in, and grain prices would fall, making bread more affordable.
Tariffs and other trade restrictions on imported food and corn were imposed in the United Kingdom between 1815 and 1846.
In British English, the term corn refers to all cereal grains, including wheat, oats, and barley. They were intended to keep corn prices high in order to benefit domestic producers, and they represented British mercantilism.
The Corn Laws restricted the import of cheap corn, first by prohibiting imports below a certain price, and later by imposing steep import duties, making it prohibitively expensive to import it from abroad, even when food supplies were scarce.
Learn more about "Corn Laws" to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/8578521
#SPJ4
What types of information are part of the electronic discovery process? (Select all that apply.)
metadata
voicemail messages
network system information
computer files
How does a bill become a law in Texas?
Answer:
In Texas, a bill must pass through both chambers of the Legislature and be approved by the Governor before it can become a law. The bill must first pass through the House of Representatives and then the Senate. Once it has been approved by both chambers, it is sent to the Governor for approval. If the Governor signs the bill, it becomes a law. If the Governor vetoes the bill, it is sent back to the Legislature for reconsideration.
Explanation:
What are the arguments for lifetime judicial appointments Federalist 78?
The arguments for lifetime judicial appointments Federalist 78 are that, a lifetime appointment will tend to give the Federal Justices the ability in order to work objectively on behalf of the people.
In the Federalist No. 78, the Hamilton tend to authored that the permanency of the judicial tenure would thus provide the judiciary with the firmness and the independence. Thus, the Federalist 78 tends to discuss the power of the judicial review.
However, the Hamilton tend to believe that the inherent effect of life tenure on the workings of the judiciary was considered to be the citadel of the public justice and also the public security.
To learn more about the Federalist 78 here:
https://brainly.com/question/30095651
#SPJ4
How did the Munich affect Germany's actions in the Czech region of the Sudetenland?
The Munich Agreement of 1938 had a great influence on German behavior in the Sudetenland of the Czech Republic. Signed by Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy, the agreement allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland, an area with a large German-speaking population in Czechoslovakia.
The annexation of the Sudetenland was an important step toward Hitler's goal of creating a Greater Germany and dealt a serious blow to the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia. The Munich Agreement yielded to Hitler's one of his demands practically without objection. The Sudetenland was of strategic importance as it was an important industrial and agricultural area and had many natural resources.
The Munich Agreement greatly increased the German military presence in the Sudetenland, established a German government, and imposed Nazi policies on the local population. This has led to massive human rights violations and persecution of Czechs and other ethnic minorities in the region.
The Munich Agreement also had a major impact on the political situation in Europe. The Nazis saw this as a sign of weakness and encouraged further territorial expansion. This led to the annexation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, the invasion of Poland in September 1939, and ultimately the outbreak of World War II.
Learn more about Munich Agreement and its impact on Germany's actions here: https://brainly.com/question/17206743
#SPJ4
Why did the framers choose to make federal judges lifetime appointments rather than elected officials?
The framers choose to make the federal judges the lifetime appointments rather than the elected officials as, the lifetime term tends to provide the job security, and also allows appointed judges to do what is right under the law.
It is quite important that the federal judges are seen to be appointed to the lifetime appointments as this is intended to order to help ensure that the decisions they make are thus guided by law and judgment and rather than trying in order to placate political interests to save jobs.
However, a judge or justice must be always fair and independent. Thus, a lifetime appointment was not considered as a significant commitment at the founding of the nation. Thus, here the lifetime term tends to provide the job security.
To learn more about the federal judges here:
https://brainly.com/question/2824627
#SPJ4
Which best explains the purpose of the Ninth Amendment Brainly?
The purpose of the Ninth Amendment can be best explained as to define specific personal rights.
The Ninth Amendment read : The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The protection of individual rights was a hot topic before, during, and after the Constitution's approval.
The Anti-Federalists eventually pushed for the insertion of a Bill of Rights into the Constitution because they believed that without one, the federal government would be given excessive power.
Federalists argued that listing protected rights would potentially harm individual liberty and make other liberties presumptively unworthy of constitutional protection, despite the fact that they felt the Constitution had established a limited central authority.
In order to uphold the idea that the rights listed in the Constitution are not all-inclusive and final and that the existence of other rights is not in any way diminished or negated by those listed, the Ninth Amendment was created.
To know more about the ninth amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12207842
#SPJ4
Courts generally assume the existence of contractual capacity. T or F
Answer:Factors that may affect the capacity to form an enforceable contract include intoxication. If a person was sufficiently intoxicated to lack mental capacity, a contract entered into by the intoxicated person is voidable at the person's option.
Explanation:
Does law of segregation occur in meiosis 1 or 2?
Where in meiosis does the law of segregation take place? Meiosis's anaphases I and II are the locations of Mendel's Segregation Law.
During this phase of the first meiotic division, the homologous chromosomes are divided into two daughter nuclei, each with a different gene version.
Does meiosis 1 or 2 experience segregation?Homologous chromosomes form during meiosis I, and sister chromatids separate into daughter cells during meiosis II. Sister chromatids are segregated to the same pole of the bipolar spindle in meiosis I, which is fundamentally different from meiosis II, which can be compared to a mitotic division.
Does meiosis 1 see allele segregation?Now we know that these "laws" are caused by important things that happen during meiotic division: Homologous chromosomes, and as a result, allele pairs, are separated during meiosis I according to the law of segregation.
To learn more about Segregation Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/13434823
#SPJ4
which of these is an exception to texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer?
Texas law prohibits practically all situations in which a vehicle is operated with a minor under the age of 18 in the truck bed or on a trailer.
Texas law prohibits practically all situations in which a vehicle is operated with a minor under the age of 18 in the truck bed or on a trailer. The following situations are exempt from this rule: driving or towing the vehicle during a procession, When a situation necessitates driving or towing the vehicle, Transporting agricultural workers from one field to another on a county road outside of a municipality, a farm-to-market road, or another route, driving the car on the beach, operating a car that is the only vehicle that the household's members own or run, etc.
To know more about Texas law :
https://brainly.com/question/22001095
#SPJ4
Why is an understanding of the Fourth Amendment important for a police officer?
Answer:
The understanding of the Fourth Amendment is important for police officers so that they do not possibly violate the rights of anyone.
The Fourth Amendment states that people have the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that law enforcement can only conduct a search with probable cause.
If police officers did not fully understand the Fourth Amendment, they may search someone without probable cause, and violate their rights. This could have several consequences, such as something private being found, or someone being wrongly imprisoned due to a personal and legal item in their possession that was seen as evidence.
Therefore, it is important for police officers to understand the Fourth Amendment.
Answer:
It protects American citizens from unreasonable search and seizure by the government,which includes police officers!
Explanation:
Explain the origins of victim impact statements and identify at least four of the core rights of victims
The first such statement in the United States was made in 1976 in Fresno, California, and became law in California in 1982 as a result of Doris Tate's concern that any members of the Manson family cult who murdered her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may be granted parole.
What are the origins of victim impact statements?Due to Doris Tate's worry that any members of the Manson family cult who killed her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may receive parole, the first such declaration in the United States was delivered in 1976 in Fresno, California, and was established as legislation in California in 1982.
The Victim Impact Statement is crucial because of this. It gives the Court a chance to hear directly from victims of violent crimes about how the defendant's acts have affected them and have continued to harm them.
The Victim Impact Statement has the potential to be a strong and useful tool, depending on its content.
Therefore, the first such statement in the United States was made in 1976 in Fresno, California, and became law in California in 1982 as a result of Doris Tate's concern that any members of the Manson family cult who murdered her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may be granted parole.
Know more about the impact statements here:
https://brainly.com/question/28321780
#SPJ1