Answer:
yes, right to life is absolute right.
Explanation:
Absolute rights include freedom of thought, conscience, and religion and the prohibitions on torture, inhuman treatment or punishment, and degrading treatment or punishment. Compare qualified right.
hope it helps
stay safe healthy and happy..Que es la capacidad de hecho y de ejercicio. concepto de cada una de ellas, clasificación y características de cada una del tipo de capacidad
Answer:
La capacidad de ejercicio es la capacidad de actuar legalmente, por ejemplo, para celebrar contratos. Una persona adquiere total independencia al cumplir los 18 años, es decir, al cumplir los 18 años. Un menor no es totalmente independiente, sólo es competente para aquellas acciones legales que, por su naturaleza, son objetivamente apropiadas a la madurez intelectual y libre de sus pares. Antes de alcanzar la mayoría de edad, la plena autonomía se adquiere al emanciparse o contraer matrimonio.
12 POINTS!
Which of the following is not a purpose of law?
A. To promote orderly social change
B. To identify wrongdoers
C. To create free human interaction
D. To sustain individual rights
Answer:
Explanation:
G
a breef summary using at least one quote on the presidents view on the economy
Answer:
And the January jobs numbers came out today. And while we are grateful for everyone who found work and is earning a paycheck, it is very clear our economy is still in trouble. We added just 6,000 private sector jobs in the country last month. Overall, we added 49,000 jobs. And this at a time when we have more than 10 million people out of work, 4 million people have been out of work for six months or longer, and 2.5 million women have been driven from the workforce. Fifteen million Americans are behind in their rental payments. Twenty-four million adults and twelve million children literally don’t have enough food to eat.
What is a migrant worker?
• traveling agriculture worker
• a skilled factory worker
laborer with permission to work in a foreign nation
O a worker in a maquiladora
Answer:
Labourer With Permission to work in a foreign nation .
When a court decision is final it gives an example to follow for future cases that are similar in nature. What is this called
When a court decision is final it gives an example to follow for future cases that are similar in nature, what is this called?
Stare decisis ( a doctrine that every court must follow)
The process whereby a court rewrites or corrects a written contract to make it conform to the true intentions of the parties is:
Answer:
The process whereby a court "rewrites" or "corrects" a written contract to make it conform to the true intentions of the parties is: reformation.
What are two subcategories of forensic science? How does the
work of each contribute to the solving of crimes?
Answer:
Some of the major Branches of Forensic Science include: Forensic Biology. Forensic Chemistry. Forensic Anthropology.
Explanation:
Target Hardening. Making your property harder for an offender to access.
Target Removal. Ensuring that a potential target is out of view.
Reducing the Means.
Reducing the Payoff.
Access Control.
Surveillance.
Environmental Change.
Rule Setting.
10. Nevada Law defines disability as?
Answer: Respect to a person
1. A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of the person
What are the primary arguments offered for reforming the practice of holding until trial poor individuals charged with a misdemeanor who cannot afford to pay bail
Answer:
increased likelihood of conviction
-increased guilty pleas for those kept in jail
-negative effects on their employment
Explanation:
Prior to the prison reform process, an alleged offender is held in custody until trial no matter how long. Therefore, some alleged offenders spend a sizeable number of time in custody before the actual trial begins and judgement is subsequently passed. In other to correct for this unfair treatment, arguments put up include an increasing likelihood of being convicted as they are being treated as convicts, they are no longer afforded the treatment given to a normal individual. The lack of funds gives an increasing likelihood of been pronounced convict. They are also in danger of losing their jobs as they are restricted for going to work and likely to be replaced rendering them enempliyed.
If an agency fails to act in good faith with regard to a _________, the courts will hear an appeal without exhaustion.
Answer: regulation
Explanation:
Citizens are allowed to sue federal administrative agencies who are empowered to make specialized rules and regulations that would enable them to properly enforce the mandate given to them by Congress.
Of course one cannot just sue at the first instance, there must have been a series of appeals to various bodies within this agency to repeal the rule or regulation that is causing grief. If those bodies refuse and it is found that the agency did not act in good faith in making the rule, the court will hear an appeal on the matter without exhaustion.
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
Should police officers be required to read a Miranda-type warning prior to custodial interrogation ?
Explanation:
they ARE required to give miranda warnings
write 3 ideas you have about "what type of government does your school have?"
Answer:
ghhdghdhgh
Explanation:
A plaintiff has brought an action for personal injuries against a store, in connection with an incident in which he slipped and fell after the store's linoleum floors had been mopped. A major issue at trial is the degree of moisture that remained on the floor, because it had been mopped 45 minutes before the plaintiff walked on it. The store offers the testimony of an expert, who will testify about an experiment he conducted measuring the amount of time necessary for a linoleum floor to dry completely after having been mopped. Under what condition should the court admit this testimony
Answer: It is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.
Explanation:
The condition under which the court should admit the testimony is that it is shown that the conditions of the expert's experiment were substantially similar to the conditions of the store's floor when the plaintiff slipped.
The testimony of the expert will only be relevant and applicable of it was similar to the scenario which led to the accident. In such case, it will be admissible if it's relevant.
As long as the conditions of the experiment of the expert replicated the conditions regarding the accident, then the experiment is said to be relevant.
What situations can we place a habeas corpus
Answer:
Habeas corpus is an internationally used legal term related to the idea of a democratic state, which means that no one can be imprisoned without a conviction. The detainee must have an absolute right, controlled by a judge, to consult a lawyer after his arrest and the right to inform his relatives or friends of his detention and, if necessary, to see a doctor. The accused must have access to the materials used by the investigating authorities in reviewing the decision to detain the accused.
Based on a tip from a reliable informant that an attorney was illegally selling automatic weapons and ammunition from his storefront office, the police obtained a warrant to search for weapons at the office. When they arrived at the building, they saw a client exiting the attorney's office and placing what appeared to be a weapon inside his jacket. The police stopped the client on the street and an officer patted down his outer clothing. The officer felt no weapon but did feel a bag with several small tube-shaped objects in it. She immediately placed the client under arrest. The contents of the bag were later determined to be marijuana cigarettes. Prior to trial on the narcotics charge, the client sought to suppress introduction of the marijuana as evidence. The arresting officer testified at the suppression hearing that, based on her long experience as a narcotics officer, she concluded immediately that the bag contained marijuana cigarettes when she first touched it. If the officer's testimony is believed, how should the court rule on the motion to suppress the marijuana evidence
Answer:
Suppression of important evidence, extra punishment.
Explanation:
I am no law student, but by what I read here, the drugs are an important evidence to the case, and cannot be suppressed to the court. Plus, by what I heard, if an officer gets a warrant for an illegal weapon trade and find illegal drugs (narcotics charge) with a dealer/client, there can still be a charge, but not for illegal weaponry, but for illegal drugs.
why should sexual harassers be given a death penalty
Answer:
BCOZ GOD WANNA THEM TO !!Why was the issue of searching a person's property so important in the time before the American Revolution?
There was much theft occurring before the Revolution and unjustified search was the only way to re-claim goods.
People have always had trouble with searches
Before the Revolution, the British often subjected American citizens to unjustified searches
After the Revolution, American soldiers searched residences for traitors.
First option: There was much theft occurring before the Revolution and unjustified search was the only way to reclaim goods.
The settlers in the "New World" responded to the strict mercantilist policies of the British Crown by smuggling and taking part in illicit trade. The British would attempt to impose revenue laws, but it was unsuccessful until British authorities made use of writs of assistance (general warrants; allowed the bearer to seize any prohibited goods, and etc).
Traffic signals at expressway on-ramps use
what color of lights.
A. yellow and green
B. yellow and red
C. red and blue
D. red and green
Answer:
D
Reason:
Red had been used to indicate danger, so they decided that green would mean go.
When duly recorded in the county where the real property of the defendant is located, a judgment becomes a
Answer:
involuntary lien.
Explanation:
Lien is a term which describes the right of a lender to sell collateral to get back the principal if the borrower cannot repay the loan. In order to be able to determine whether a borrower would default on the repayment of a loan, lenders usually check the credit score of the borrower.
An involuntary lien can be defined as a claim made by a third party against the property owned by another without the person's consent or agreement, especially to secure money owed to the third party by the property owner.
Generally, a judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction is an involuntary lien.
This ultimately implies that, when duly recorded in the county where the real property of the property owner (defendant) is located, a judgment granted by a court of competent jurisdiction becomes an involuntary lien.
What's the meaning if a cousin brother becomes friendly out of blue and ask if you have a BF?? Reply ASAP
Answer
For me, its that he wants to know who it is so he could threaten them, bully them, or become friends with them to tell them bad stuff about you.
Explanation:
Usually a positive thinker as well, but I faced to much stuff to know that this is usually not a good think. Remain silent about it.
You are preparing to park your car and you notice that you are near a railroad crossing. You must not park Choose an answer: A. Within 35 feet of a railroad crossing.B. Within 40 feet of a railroad crossing.C. Within 50 feet of a railroad crossing. Helpppppp
Answer:
withtin 50 feet
Explanation:
i got it right
You are preparing to park your car and you notice that you are near a railroad crossing. You must not park Within 50 feet of a railroad crossing. Option C. This is further explained below.
What is a railroad crossing?Generally, railroad crossing is simply defined as a point at which two railways or two roads intersect at ground level.
In conclusion, You see that you are near a railroad crossing as you prepare to park your automobile. Railroad crossings require you to keep your vehicle at least 50 feet away from the tracks.
Read more about railroad crossing
https://brainly.com/question/7282920
#SPJ2
how was the military service act of 1912 related to the development of voting rights for women?
the president of the us was not smart that time and men wanted bad people so when the good president was there he made women's vote so the men don't choose
as a passenger how many seconds will it take to complete a stopped right turn
Carrying long loads: how far can a load extend behind your car before you are required to put a red light on both the right and left side of the protruding load?
Answer:
4 feet or more
Explanation:
According to the laws of Florida, when carrying loads, and the load extends 4 feet or more behind your car, then it must be clearly marked by a red light on both the right and left side of the protruding load.
Therefore, the correct answer is 4 feet or more.
Since the late 1980s, the courts in Texas have become more favorable to defendants in civil cases than to plaintiffs. Why
Answer:
More Republican than Democratic justices have been elected.
In general, more conservative than liberal justices have been elected.
Several tort reform laws were passed during the early 2000s that limited damages against defendants.
beliefs and positions related to racism
What is the key difference in why the Fourth Amendment does not apply to private security guards as it does to law enforcement agencies?
the word authority
the word govemmental
the word federal
the word unlawful
Answer:
unlawful
Explanation:
no badge holder on guard
s
Question 13
The new redesigned UCR is called the
A. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
ms
B. Offender-Based Trasaction Statistics
C. National Criminal Victimization Survey
O D. National Incident-Based Reporting System
Answer:
D. National Incident-Based Reporting System.
Explanation:
The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is a program of the federal government of the United States of America that was launched in 1929.
The main purpose of the UCR is to gather and compile informations on crimes that were committed and reported to the law enforcement agencies in the United States of America.
Generally, the federal bureau of intelligence (FBI) are saddled with the responsibility of publishing these crime statistics reports in the United States of America.
This ultimately implies that, the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) measures the most serious crimes in the United States of America, also referred to as Part I crimes.
The new redesigned Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) is called the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). It took a five (5) year redesign effort to transform the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program into the more comprehensive and well-detailed National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland?
Group of answer choices.
A. It helped local governments use direct democracy.
B. It denied states the right to control local governments.
C. It supported the strength of local governments over states.
D. It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
E. It showed how the national government’s power needs to be checked.
Answer:
D. It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
Explanation:
McCulloch v. Maryland was a litigation or court case between the national bank known as The Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland with respect to the tax that was imposed on it by the state.
Basically, the state of Maryland passed a legislation to impose taxes on bank notes ($15,000 annually) of any bank that is not chartered in the state of Maryland.
However, James W. McCulloch who was head at the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank objected and refused to pay the tax. Consequently, the appellate court of Maryland ruled that the Second Bank was established unconstitutionally because the federal government is not provided a textual commitment by the constitution to charter a bank.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Marshall ruled that the Federal government of USA has certain implied powers accorded or given to it by the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution but are not explicitly stated therein.
Hence, the effect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland was that it legitimized the power of the national government over states by invoking the doctrine of implied powers to increase its federal authority.