Gandhi, widely recognized as a leader of the nonviolent protest movement in India, exhibited contradictions in his actions and attitudes toward certain groups like women and Black people. While he championed the principles of nonviolence, equality, and justice, his views and treatment of these groups were not always consistent with these ideals.
In the case of women, Gandhi's perspective reflected the societal norms and traditional roles prevalent during his time. He believed in the concept of gender complementarity, emphasizing women's roles as mothers, caregivers, and custodians of morality.
He advocated for women's education and economic empowerment but often placed them in subordinate positions, limiting their participation in public life and political decision-making. Gandhi's stance on women's rights can be seen as contradictory to his broader principles of equality and nonviolence.
Similarly, Gandhi's attitude toward Black people also demonstrated contradictions. While he fought against colonial oppression and racial discrimination in India, his experiences in South Africa exposed him to racial prejudices and injustices.
Gandhi held certain beliefs that have been criticized as racist, including derogatory remarks about Black people. These viewpoints have rightfully faced scrutiny and criticism as they contradict his core principles of nonviolence and equality.
It is important to recognize that Gandhi, like any historical figure, was not immune to the biases and prejudices prevalent in his time and cultural context.
By acknowledging these contradictions, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of Gandhi's legacy and continue to strive for a more inclusive and equitable society.
It reminds us of the importance of critically evaluating the actions and attitudes of leaders, even those who have made significant contributions to social and political movements.
For more questions on Gandhi,
https://brainly.com/question/497492
#SPJ11
The bombing of Pearl Harbor was the culmination of two decades of friction between the US and Japan.
True/False
Answer:
True
Why did the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor when they knew they couldn't take on the United States?
Contrary to popular belief, the Japanese decision to strike Pearl Harbor and risk a lengthy war with the US was considerably more deliberate. Japan had been engaged in a war they thought would last only a few months in China for 10 years. Although they had made tremendous progress in China, the battle was depleting their resources. Because there was no source of steel, rationing was implemented, and the ironwork on public buildings was being melted down.
They understood that if they wanted to escape having to abandon their China expedition and losing all they had fought for for the previous 10 years, they needed to seize control of the East Indies' resources.
Japan was aware that any attempt to conquer the Indies would almost certainly result in military conflict with the US because the US was highly hostile to their ambitions in China. Their strategy for moving forward was influenced by their victory in the Russo-Japanese war. Japan scored a significant naval victory in the conflict but refrained from attacking Russia directly. Russia made certain political and territorial concessions to Japan as a result of their defeat, and that was pretty much the end of it. Russia was not damaged in any way.
They planned to achieve a comparable knockout victory against the US and, as a result, receive a free hand in Asia by following the example of the Russo-Japanese conflict. However, they understood they would lose if America chose to fight a long-lasting conflict with them. However, they anticipated that they would have to make compromises, including leaving China, and that their outcomes would be similar to those of Russia. But if they were unable to conquer the Indies, they would have to accomplish that anyhow.
They had not anticipated the US demand for an unconditional surrender, and although they initially thought the battle would merely be about concessions, they suddenly found themselves in a fight for their lives. Nobody could have ever imagined that Japan would be reduced to a burning ruin four years later.
Thank you,
Eddie
Which unpopular king was forced by his rebellious nobles to sign the very important magna carta?
King John of England was forced by his rebellious nobles to sign the very important magna carta.
The Magna Carta, sometimes known as the "Great Charter," was likely the most important early effect on the lengthy historical process that resulted in the current system of constitutional law in the English-speaking world. King John of England was coerced by his subjects into signing the Magna Carta, which outlines what would eventually be regarded as human rights, in 1215 after breaking a number of old rules and practises that had previously been used to govern England.
They included the freedom of the church from state intrusion, the right of all free citizens to own and inherit property, and the freedom from onerous taxation. In addition to establishing fair trials and equal treatment under the law, it also implies the principle of property-owning widows to decide whether or not to remarry. Additionally, it included clauses outlawing governmental misconduct and bribery.
To learn more about magna carta here,
https://brainly.com/question/2088363
#SPJ4
The __________ was created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and has since become a formidable regulatory force in the administration of human resource management.
The Equal Employment was created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and has since become a formidable regulatory force in the administration of human resource management.
Equal employment opportunity was created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and has since become a formidable regulatory force in the administration of human resource management.
What is equal employment opportunity?Equal employment opportunity refers to equal opportunity to attain or maintain employment in a company, organization, or other institution. Examples of legislation to foster it or to protect it from eroding include the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which was established by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to assist in the protection of United States employees from discrimination. The law was the first federal law designed to protect most US employees from employment discrimination based on that employee's race, colour, religion, sex, or national origin.
Equal employment opportunity was further enhanced when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order 11246 on September 24, 1965, created to prohibit federal contractors from discriminating against employees based on race, sex, creed, religion, colour, or national origin.
An example of an equal employment opportunity issue is wages.
Learn more about employment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ2
which was allowed under the new system of government in japan following world war ll
Answer:
Women were allowed to vote.
Explanation:
what resulted from bataan death march
It was an important propaganda win for the United States showing the Imperial Japanese Army was not an unbeatable army that had rolled over many other colonial territories in the Pacific, despite their hard defense of the peninsula. This is further explained below.
What is the Bataan Death March?Generally, The Bataan Death March, a cruel 65-mile march during which thousands of troops perished from famine, thirst, and gratuitous abuse, was enacted on the captured American and Filipino soldiers.
In conclusion, It was an important propaganda win for the United States showing the Imperial Japanese Army was not an unbeatable army that had rolled over many other colonial territories in the Pacific, despite their tenacious defense of the peninsula, which eventually led to their capitulation.
Read more about Bataan Death March
https://brainly.com/question/9649032
#SPJ1
what resulted from Bataan death march was a propaganda win where united states prove that the Imperial Japanese Army was not an unbeatable army.
What is the Bataan Death March?Bataan death march serves as the display of cruelty, where a lot of troop gave up the ghost as a result of lack of food and water.
However, all these was done so that united state can prove that the Imperial Japanese Army was not an unbeatable army.
Learn Bataan Death March at:
https://brainly.com/question/14697417
#SPJ1
Who usually represents the lender at a closing?
a. broker for the buyer.
b. broker for the seller.
c. lender’s attorney.
d. title insurance representative.
Lender's attorney is usually represent the lender at a closing.Lender attorney also known as closing attorney ,who take care of all the arrangement to prepares all of the legal paper work involved in between the buyer or seller at closing.
He coordinate communication between with borrowers, sellers, lender and the real estate agents. Conducting the closing, final rundown of the title at the registry of deals.
Lender attorney also perform various function during the deeds, like - recording of documents, Disbursement of the transaction proceeds preparation and issuance of thee title insurance policy.He is responsible for all the organizing the closing of real estate transactions.
To learn more about real estate here
https://brainly.com/question/10336196
#SPJ4
the owners and captain of the titanic believed the ship was invincible and could not sink this shows effect of
Answer:
Hubris
Explanation:
What kind of shift happened in US politics after Jimmy Carter's election?
A. a shift toward defense-centered politics
a shift toward reunifying
B. Northern and Southern states
C. a shift toward negotiation and diplomacy abroad
D. a shift toward
candidate-centered campaigns
Answer: The Option D
Explaination : The 1976 United States presidential election was the 48th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 2, 1976. Democrat Jimmy Carter of Georgia defeated incumbent Republican President Gerald Ford from Michigan by a narrow victory of 297 electoral college votes to Ford's 240.
Which of these is a title of a 1983 hit for eddy grant, and not a property on a classic monopoly board?.
The inference is that a title of a 1983 hit for eddy grant, and not a property on a classic monopoly board is the electric avenue.
What is an inference?It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information.
Here, the inference is that a title of a 1983 hit for eddy grant, and not a property on a classic monopoly board is the electric avenue.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Have the colonists tired to work with the King of England and the English
Government?
Elements of buddhism, as interpreted in japanese woodblock prints, influenced which artist?
a. Frida kahlo
b. Vincent van gogh
c. Leonardo da vinci
d. Auguste renoir
The correct answer is option b. Vincent Van Gogh.
How did elements of Buddhism influence Van Gogh?The Dutch painter highlighted in his works the impressionist painting, which was directly impacted by his religion to Zen Buddhism, which instituted philosophies of personal well-being so that there was inspiration for the composition of the works, which was also influenced by Japanese art.
Therefore, the ideas and currents of thought followed by the artist have a relevant impact on his artistic work, which can be perceived through the elements used in the works.
Find out more about Vincent Van Gogh here:
https://brainly.com/question/11650365
#SPJ1
What was the role of Mahatma gandhi in the Indian independence movement during indias independence struggl;e
Answer:
His non-violent resistance helped end British rule in India and has influenced modern civil disobedience movements across the globe. Widely referred to as Mahatma, meaning great soul or saint in Sanskrit, Gandhi helped India reach independence through a philosophy of non-violent non-cooperation.
Explanation:
In a few sentences, describe what you think were the most important changes in American life during the coronavirus
pandemic.
Answer:
As the citizens of America had to endure the Coronavirus pandemic, they were faced with new challenges and situations. Lives would change socially as people would quarantine and have to resort to digital meetings in order to mitigate the spread of the virus. American schools would also change in the form of its attendance, with students learning from an online platform with their teacher. Outside of the home, conflict arose with contradiction of opinion concerning new policies, such as mask wearing, or limiting the amount of people allowed into an establishment at once.
Explanation:
I hope this helped
The most important change in American life during the coronavirus pandemic is changing the perspectives in looking for relationships between individuals.
What are the effects of the coronavirus pandemic?The coronavirus pandemic's consequences include destroyed sectors and the loss of millions of jobs. Covid-19 represents a risk to sustainable energy, global poverty, and inequality worldwide.
Numerous millions of individuals face the chance of living in extreme poverty as a result of the pandemic's destructive economic and social devastation.
The COVID-19 problem may be transforming American culture, just as it has done throughout the globe, where it has had a significant impact on how individuals live, work, and communicate with many elements of societal institutions.
Learn more about the coronavirus pandemic, here:
https://brainly.com/question/21163836
#SPJ2
What gave job training, education and low interest rate home loans to veterans after World War II?
Answer:
Servicemen's Readjustment Act
Explanation:
The Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944 was a law that provided a range of benefits for some of the returning World War II veterans. It ushered into law sweeping benefits for veterans, including college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance.
The event described in the headline happened because president Andrew Jackson:
A-blamed the National Bank for causing an economic panic.
B-thought the National Bank should issue more paper money.
C-believed the National Bank favored the wealthy.
D-wanted the National Bank to set up new tariffs.
The event described in the headline happened because of President Andrew Jackson's option(c) i.e, believed the National Bank favored the wealthy.
From 1829 until 1837, Andrew Jackson served as the seventh President of the United States and aimed to serve as the person's voice. More than any of his predecessors, Andrew Jackson was elected by the people, and in his capacity as president, he aimed to serve as the voice of the ordinary man.
Jackson supported states' rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution, but he also thought that when the federal government was given authority by the Constitution, it had to be paramount. Jackson also respected the Union and was unwilling to see it weaken or fall apart.
Being a proud self-made "common" man, he claimed that the bank had a bias in favor of the wealthy. He represented the bank as a "hydra-headed" monster because he was a westerner who was concerned about the growth of eastern commercial interests and the emigration of species from the west.
To know more about Andrew Jackson refer to: https://brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ1
1815-1848," *the new american history, 1990 the development described in the excerpt is most similar to the development in what other period?
The link between political change and socioeconomic upheaval is real but complex.
Economic grievances related to early industrialization fueled subsequent revolutions, especially the outbursts of 1848, but later social classes were not the bearers of this information. main revolutionary message. Revolutions were also the result of new political ideas against the institutions and social arrangements of the pre-industrial order.
Their results have facilitated other economic changes, but that was not necessarily their intention. Political instability should be seen as a discrete factor shaping a new Europe alongside basic economic forces.
A highlight of the 1840s was the California Gold Rush, an event that shaped American history. Robert J. McNamara is a history expert and former magazine reporter.
The Mexican-American War resulted in the redrawing of national borders in North America. In the United States, a massive exodus to the New West Coast occurred after California's merger with Mexico, with the gold rush beginning at the end of the decade.
On January 24, 1848, James Marshall discovered gold near Fort Sutter, California. The discovery of gold was the beginning of the California Gold Rush of 1849. The 1849 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War increasingly dependent on it to sustain their cotton-based economy. Northerners did not necessarily want social and political equality for blacks; they only seek their liberation.
Throughout the 1990s, the US economy recovered from the recession and strengthened. Inflation and unemployment are low. There have been new developments in medicine and technology. The Internet has begun to evolve from a defense project primarily connecting researchers to a new way for the world to communicate.
To learn more about American history:
https://brainly.com/question/1874247
#SPJ4
In north america, three new and very different empires had arisen in the late seventeenth century:____.
Spanish, French, and English were the three new and very different empires that had arisen in the late seventeenth century In north America.
The Spanish were the first to invade the continent of North America and its inhabitants in 1565 in St. Augustine, Florida, followed by the British in 1587 when the Plymouth Company founded a town in present-day Vir ginia that they named Roanoke. Following the strange failure of this initial settlement, the London Company established a presence in what would eventually become Jamestown, Vir ginia, in 1606.
From there, the Dutch established a colony in modern-day New York in 1609 before the French founded Quebec in 1608. While Native Americans battled new diseases brought by the Europeans and the slave trade during this time, they also resisted European attempts to seize land and power.
To learn more about different empires in north America here,
https://brainly.com/question/17237859
#SPJ4
Review the following video with author Eric Foner on the Sand Creek Massacre. Match the following significant events of the Civil War in Indian territory to their correct description.
The review matchup are are:
Sand Creek Massacre- occurred on November 1864 and this was said to be an assault by Union troops of about 700 Cheyennes and Arapahos in the city of Colorado.
Sioux Massacre- this is linked to the fact that more than 300 indigenous people were known to be sentenced to death due to the killing of a white farmers.
Glorieta Pass- Associated with Confederate defeat in New Mexico in the year 1862, match to be precise.
What was the Sand Creek massacre?This was said to have taken place on November 29, 1864, and there was the fact that about 700 federal troops were known to have attacked a village that is made up of 500 Cheyenne and Arapaho on Sand Creek in the city of Colorado.
Note that this was said to be a form of an unprovoked attack on the people made up of men, women, and children. The massacre at Sand Creek brought about the turning point in the association between American Indian tribes and that of the Federal Government.
Learn more about Glorieta Pass from
https://brainly.com/question/11205626
#SPJ1
How did increased global interactions impact China? Japan?
The increased involvement of China and Japan in global interactions has boosted their national income, spurred trade, increase investment, promoted healthy development of their economy.
What is known as global interactions?A global interactions emanates from globalization which means a process where an institution develop an international influence or start operating on an international scale.
For the country that include China and Japan, the increased involvement in global interactions has boosted their national income, spurred trade, increase investment, promoted healthy development of their economy.
Read more about globalization
brainly.com/question/25499191
#SPJ1
Nonfiction writing can be expository,
persuasive, descriptive, or narrative.
O True
O False
Please help
Me
What story published in
newspapers made U.S. citizens
react with outrage and demand
that something be done in Cuba?
A. when they heard that people were subject to
public execution
B. when they heard the French were torturing
Cuban citizens
C. when they heard that kids were being thrown
to sharks by Spaniards
D. when they heard that Jose Marti was
assassinated
The story that was published in newspapers that made US citizens to react with outrage and Demand that something be done in Cuba was when they heard the French were torturing Cuban citizens.
Human rights in CubaCuba has suffered from a lot of Human rights infringement by successive governments from western countries especially in the 20th Century.
The torture of Cuban citizens by the French government made headlines in the newspapers and US citizens demanded that something be done about the situation.
learn more about Cuba at https://brainly.com/question/8393101
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Explanation:
when they heard that kids were being thrown
to sharks by Spaniards
PLEASE HELP ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
7.09 Module Project
Step 1: Determine Your Position
Decide whether you will defend or reject the following statement:
“World War II was a continuation of World War I.”
Analyze the causes, course, and consequences of both World War I and World War II.
What countries fought in World War I, and why did each fight?
What were the terms of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I?
What were the effects of World War I?
What were the political, economic, and social developments in the period between the end of World War I and start of World War II?
Step 2: Plan Your Argument
Remember that a good response is one that incorporates a strong thesis (also called a position, stance, or claim), logical arguments that support your thesis, evidence to support each argument, and a conclusion that ties your ideas together. Before you begin writing, organize your thoughts.
Step 3: Write Your Argument
Outline-
Paragraph 1- an introduction that introduces the topic, explains why it is important, and states your thesis/claim (World War II was a continuation of World War I or World War II was not a continuation of World War I)
Paragraph 2- Explain your evidence to claim why you do believe it was or was not a continuation (explanation regarding how the evidence supporting the thesis/claim is stronger than the evidence supporting the counterclaim ) evidence to support each argument
Paragraph 3- Explain your evidence to claim why you do NOT believe it was or was not a continuation -a counterclaim and evidence to support the counterclaim and evidence
Paragraph 4- Conclusion
No, World War II did not a continuation of World War I. The major nations did not put the war on hold for 20 years before picking it back up. The major powers established peace during the Napoleonic Wars, which lasted from 1801 to 1803, and then resumed hostilities. From 1918 through 1939, that didn't occur.
World War II did not start on all fronts at once, in contrast to World War I. A month-long fighting in Poland marked the start of the Eastern Front. Poland battled Germany there on its own. The Soviet Union entered the fray to claim its part of the spoils in accordance with the Nazi-Soviet Pact. In several prior posts, I've discussed the motivations for that covenant as well as its several authors. The Phony War, also known as the Sitzkrieg or the Guerre de Drole, was the first conflict on the Western Front and lasted from September 1939 until April 1940. A significant leafleting effort over Western Germany marked the start of the British air operations there. The Third Reich's version of the Leaflet of the Month Club, according to one author!
As the conflict dragged on, the battle on the old fronts altered and the battle on the new fronts started. The battle on the Western Front evolved into an air and sea conflict between June 1940 and June 1944. Hitler's conquest of Vichy France in November 1942 constituted his sole campaign there. With the exception of little opposition at Toulon, the principal French naval station, the takeover was bloodless. The Western Front last witnessed a ground conflict during and after D-Day. Therefore, unlike World War I, there was a break in the ground war on the Western Front. In contrast, North Africa was a regular fighting zone from September 1940 until May 1943. Up to Italy's capitulation in September 1943, the Mediterranean maritime war dragged on even longer. So, unlike World War I, the Mediterranean and North Africa became significant battle theaters.
In contrast to World War I, the Eastern Front served as the primary front in World War II. The other European fronts paled in comparison to the Eastern Front in terms of the intensity of the battle, the number of deaths, the breadth of the damage, and the influence of the outcome on Europe and the rest of the globe. Even more brutal than World War I's Western Front was the Eastern Front of World War II. The effects of the Soviet triumph and the Nazi loss on Europe and the rest of the globe were considerably more revolutionary than the effects of the Allied victory and the German defeat in World War I. While World War I destroyed four autocracies and created several independent nations in Europe, World War II changed the political, economic, and social systems of half of Europe and many other areas of the world.
The ideological gap between the major nations was much wider during World War II. Fascism and communism, two new philosophies, emerged. Additionally, the participation of the United States was far more significant than that of France. Although Japan had a similar role in both wars (she was an expansionist), the Pacific War was more significant and well-known than the East Asia War of World War I. Japan took Germany's possessions there quickly during World War I. The outcome on the Eastern Front was very different. Germany conquered Russia in World War I, leading to the severe Brest-Litovsk Treaty being imposed on Russia. She was defeated, and as a result Russia had a significant bottom-up revolution. The Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany in World War II. The Allies divided Germany into two. A significant revolution that sprang mostly from above affected practically all of Central and Eastern Europe as well as half of Germany.
In addition to the Nazi Holocaust against an entire people, the Jews, and a Nazi campaign of destruction, hunger, and cruel exploitation and enslavement against the majority of Slavs in Eastern Europe, World War II also saw the Nazi occupation of most of the Slavs in the region. No such campaigns existed during World War I. The Armenian Genocide, a World War I battle, took place outside of Europe.
>> Cheers
No, the Second World War was not a continuation of the First. The big powers did not halt the war for 20 years before resuming it. During the Napoleonic Wars, which took place between 1801 and 1803, the major countries established peace before resuming hostilities. That didn't happen from 1918 until 1939.
What is war?War is defined as a violent armed conflict between states, governments, society, or paramilitary groups such as mercenaries, insurgents, and militias. It is characterized by severe violence, damage, and mortality, and it employs either conventional or irregular military
Troops. Warfare refers to the shared behaviors and characteristics of various types of war, as well as warfare in general. Total war is defined as warfare that is not limited to only legitimate military goals and can result in significant civilian and non-combatant suffering and casualties.
Germany launched the second World War in 1939, making the first attempt at winning. Germany's entry into World War II was largely influenced by the Treaty of Versailles, which was a result of World War One, despite numerous other factors. This demonstrates how WW1 directly affected WW2, which was a direct continuation.
Therefore, The Second World War was not a continuation of the First. The big powers did not halt the war
Learn more about war here:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ2
In what area of Europe was religious reformation
markedly different from other areas?
Germany
Italy
England
France
Describe the two major developments that made it possible for human beings to migrate to the western hemisphere from asia.
The two major developments that made it possible for human beings to migrate to the western hemisphere from Asia are, first, people successfully adapted to the frigid environment near the Artic circle. Second, changes in the Earths climate reconnected North America to Asia.
The human beings of the small bands of hunters in pursuit of game started to migrate to the western hemisphere from Asia because of the two major developments.
The developments were- First, human adaptability to the frigid environment near the Arctic Circle, and second, changes in the earth's climate which led to the reconnection of North America to Asia.
Hence, the two major developments which led to the migration of the people to the western hemisphere from Asia were discussed above.
To learn more about the migration here:
https://brainly.com/question/14800319
#SPJ4
What were the navigation acts of 1651
In essence, foreign ships delivering commercial goods to and from UK ports, including the colonies, were forbidden under the Acts of Trade and Navigation. They guaranteed jobs for crew members from the UK and its colonies, granted the merchant fleet a monopoly that allowed it to expand, encouraged shipbuilding and development throughout the Empire, and laid the groundwork for the rapid growth of the Royal Navy. The legislation also boosted manufacturing and industry, resulting in the creation of more stable jobs both at home and in the colonies. Overall, the Acts were created to safeguard Empire commerce and employees and to stop the importation of low-cost commodities produced by uncontrolled foreign companies and conveyed by unregulated ships. The only losers were our competitors, many of whom continued to use slave labor in order to lower manufacturing costs and boost profitability while also excluding them from many of the completed items and raw materials that they were required to purchase and have transported by Empire ships. Because their commercial vessels could fly the Red Ensign, giving them access to commercial possibilities and the protection of the Royal Navy, the New England colonies were pleased to comply with the Navigation Acts, so long as they were not too rigidly enforced. The gentlemen of commerce and professions in the colonies started considering revolt when Grenville decided to severely enforce the Navigation Acts in 1763 in order to create income.
Who invented the sewing machine? a. Elias Howe c. Samuel Morse b. Robert Fulton d. John Deere
Answer:
A. Elias Howe
Explanation:
The sewing machine was created simultaneously by five different persons. All of those people were brought together by Singer, a technical genius, who created the first Singer Sewing Machine by combining the best elements of each machine. Everyone was requested to sign the patent with their names. But none did... FYI…Singer was the first company ever to spend a million dollars to advertise and promote their wonderful new device. In the USA, we think Elias Howe ought to be recognized with creating the first functional lockstitch sewing machine. The term "lockstitch" is significant because Howe's design was more practical than hand sewing for producing clothing because it was the first mechanized stitching technique to produce a stitch out of two individual threads that "locked" and didn't unstitch itself nearly as easily as the chainstitch machines at the time. While Howe was seeking potential investors in Europe, Isaac Merrit Singer rapidly stole his concept, copyrighted his invention, and established an American empire, becoming the country's own Thomas Edison before the real Thomas Edison.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
there were like 6 men and one of them was Elias Howe
hope it helps ya
What action did the united states and britain take in iran during the cold war in 1953?
The United States and Britain removed Iran's Prime Minister in a coup and replaced him with a despot who was loyal to their interests.
What transpired in the 1953 coup in Iran?A coup planned and funded by the British and American governments deposed Iranian Premier Mohammad Mossadegh on August 19, 1953. The Shah immediately came back to power and handed over 40% of Iran's oil fields to American firms.
The democratically elected Iranian government was overthrown in a coup d'état in 1953, which was masterminded by the CIA and British intelligence. Mohammad Mossadegh's regime. The coup's aftershocks are still being felt.
Learn more about the 1953 Iran coup with the help of the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/2709734
#SPJ4
World War 2
What event caused the start of World War 2?
Answer:
Hitler's InvasionExplanation:
Hitler's invasion of Poland in September 1939 drove Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany, marking the beginning of World War II.Hope it helpsWhat was the fundamental flaw in chadwick’s thinking about the spread of disease throughout london?
The fundamental flaw in Chadwick's thinking about the spread of disease throughout London was that, Chadwick accidentally caused the deaths of tens of thousands of cholera victims due to his lack of understanding of the germ theory of disease.
Sir Edwin Chadwick was an English social reformer who improve sanitation and public health.
During the cholera epidemic of 1848- 49, Chadwick ordered the replacement of the traditional brick sewers with his self-flushing, glazed pipes in hopes of conveying the sewage to farmers for use as manure.
Hence, during the 19th century, four major outbreaks of cholera disease damaged London communities and led to the death of tens of thousands of people.
To learn more about the cholera here:
https://brainly.com/question/938397
#SPJ4
Explain why the plague led to the rise of more powerful kings and nation-states by the 16th century.
The reason why the plague led to the rise of more powerful kings and nation-states by the 16th century was that the power of the Nobles and Lords were eroded.
How did the plague create modern nation states?Before the plague, Lords and Nobles exercised significant power over their lands and as such, the King did not have much power when it came to controlling them.
The plague however led to the deaths of the workforce of the Nobles and led to their power being eroded. As a result, they had to turn to the King for protection and which led to the Kings gaining more power and thereby creating modern nation-state.
Find out more on the effects of the plague at https://brainly.com/question/16066397
#SPJ1