In contrast to Lincoln, Stephen Douglas championed the idea of popular sovereignty as a way to resolve the slavery dispute, which contributed greatly to...

A. violent conflict in Kansas
B. western expansion
C. border skirmishes in Texas
D. a decline in abolitionist sentiment

Answer: What was Stephen Douglas's theory of popular sovereignty? People within a territory should choose whether to allow slavery or not

Stephen Douglas, in contrast to Abraham Lincoln, promoted the notion of popular sovereignty as a means of resolving the slavery controversy, which significantly fueled armed strife in Kansas. Option A is correct.

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery throughout the United States, was ratified by the US Congress on December 6, 1865, marking the end of the war.

One of the untold momentous qualities between Douglas and Lincoln's perspectives on slavery is that, in contrast to Lincoln, Douglas did not see slavery as a motive perplexity, an agonizing choice, or a problem that would divide the Union.

Unlike Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglas advocated for popular sovereignty as a means of resolving the slavery debate, which largely fueled violent conflict in Kansas.

Therefore, option A is correct.

To learn more about the slavery dispute, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/28888645

#SPJ2

PLS HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLSSSSSSSSS

Select the TWO African regions on the map that remained independent through the nineteenth century.

John Adams still believed that the term “massacre” was appropriate. Even though he was the defense attorney, what is his reason for making such a statement?

Which statements about the relative location of Texas are accurate? Check all that apply.Texas is south of Oklahoma.Texas is west of New Mexico.Texas is bordered by Mexico to the south.Texas is on the Pacific coast.Texas is along the Gulf of Mexico.Texas is west of Louisiana.Texas is north of Arkansas.

What do Denmark, NorwayFinland, Sweden and Switzerland have in common?

what is meant by " Reagan Doctrine"?

4. How was the Espionage Act
amended in 1918 (Sedition
Act)? Discuss the changes.

Is James Horn’s assertion that “Jamestown also presents two sides of America’s founding. On the one hand, England’s New World offered many settlers opportunities for social and economic advancement unthinkable at home; while on the other, colonization unleashed powerful destructive forces that were catastrophic for Indian peoples, whose lands were taken by colonists, and for enslaved Africans and their posterity, whose labor enabled Jamestown, and indeed America, to flourish” true? Why or why not?

Who led the third Crusade?

Richard the Lionhearted

Stephen of France

Pop Urban II

Peter the Hermit

Brainliest for the best awnser!
You examined the factors that contributed to the decline of the medieval period. In a two-paragraph response answer the following questions using evidence from the unit. Make sure to follow the C.E.R. writing format.
What does it mean that the Middle Ages “declined”? Provide a few examples of this happening from the unit.

How did events and conditions in the Middle Ages set the stage for the Renaissance and the modern era?

Pls help Between meetings, members of Congress________

Which similarity existed between the religious practices of the Maya and Aztec in MesoAmerica?

the american hostages were held in the u.s. embassy in teheran by their iranian captors

what was the first tree displayed at the white house

why was there a rise of dictators in europe and asia during the 1930s?

Did North Carolina generally back or oppose any of the plans that were presented at the Convention?

When was the gold rush.

What economic policy did Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon favor?
A breaking up monopolies and protecting the rights of workers
B restricting the absolute freedom of business leaders
C advancing business interests and lowering taxes
D lowering tariff rates on foreign imports

Southern states agreed to the 3/5 Compromise because it would be counted towards _____________ for the South.

legislative representation

judicial representation

executive representation

how did the Three Estates act as a cause of the French Revolution

On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated: A. while in Dallas supporting a garbage workers' strike. B. as he launched the Poor People's Campaign. C. and while the nation mourned his death, there was no violence. D. and Congressional support for the Open Housing Act declined. E. and no one was ever charged with the crime.

How did the location of Islamic lands make cultural diffusion possible

Compare the 1830 and 1850 census information. What changes do you see?
PLS HELP!!!

Paul wrote his first epistles to the:

A. Romans
B. Corinthians
C. Galatians
D. Thessalonians

How does a lobbyist impact the law making process? They handled requests from the constituents on the behalf of their Representative. They work on the behalf of Interest Groups to attempt to influence them to make laws that benefit the efforts of those in their group. They volunteer to do research and office duties in the office of the Representative. They gather information on issues the committees will handle.

PLEASE HELP THANK YOU SO MUCH!!

when two sides of an international conflict possess such enormous arsenals of nuclear missiles that each has the ability to destroy the other in the event of war, it is called

I hate ap world sm okurrrr

What new states were admitted between 1791 and 1821?

Write TWO paragraphs describing John Marshall and the Supreme Court made the United States Constitution and the National Government the supreme law of the land.

Shorten this and put it in your own words


Around the year 133 BC, Rome was set up as a democracy. Later the Roman people were sovereign. Even the system of voting was weighted to give more influence to the votes of the wealthy. By 14 AD, when the first emperor Augustus died, popular elections had all but disappeared. This was nothing short of a revolution, brought about through a century of constant civil strife, and sometimes open warfare. Many Romans themselves put the key turning point in 133 BC. The course of events is clear enough.In the process, he deposed from office another tribune who opposed the distribution and argued that his reforms should be funded from the money that came from the new Roman imperial province of Asia. Gracchus's land bill was passed. Gracchus's motivation is much less clear. Whatever his motives were, his career crystallised many of the main issues that were to underlie the revolutionary politics of the next hundred years.The consequences of Rome's growing empire were crucial. Tiberius's decision to use the revenues of Asia for his land distribution was a provocative claim - that the poor as well as the rich should enjoy the fruits of Rome's conquests. But Tiberius's desire to stand for a second tribunate also raised questions of personal political dominance. This became an increasingly urgent issue as leading men in the first century BC, such as Julius Caesar, were sometimes given vast power to deal with the military threats facing Rome from overseas - and then proved unwilling to lay down that power when they returned to civilian life. The events of 133 BC were followed by a series of intensifying crises. At the end of the century Gaius Marius, a stunningly successful soldier, defeated enemies in Africa, Gaul and finally in Italy, when Rome's allies in Italy rebelled against her.He held the highest office of state, the consulship, no fewer than seven times, an unprecedented level of long-term dominance of the political process. Marius then came into violent conflict with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, another Roman warlord, who after victories in the east actually marched on Rome in 82 BC and established himself 'dictator'.This had been an ancient Roman office designed to give a leading politician short terms powers in an emergency.Unlike Julius Caesar, however, who was to become dictator 40 years later, Sulla retired from the office and died in his bed.The middle years of the first century BC were marked by violence in the city, and fighting between gangs supporting rival politicians and political programmes.The two protagonists were Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus ('Pompey the Great', as he was called, after Alexander the Great) and Julius Caesar.Caesar promoted radical policies in the spirit of Tiberius Gracchus; Pompey had the support of the traditionalists.Historians in both the ancient and modern world have devoted enormous energy to tracking the precise stages by which these two men came head-to-head in civil war. But the fact is that, given the power each had accrued and their entrenched opposition, war between them was almost inevitable. Not much 'liberty' was to follow. Instead there was another decade of civil war as Caesar's supporters first of all battled it out with his assassins, and when they had been finished off, fought among themselves.