If we took an SRS of 1700 people from California (population 34 million) and an SRS of 1000 people from Detroit (population 1 million) which sampling distribution would have the smaller standard deviation

The length of the hypotenuse is 4.

Let the three sides of the right triangle be a, b, and c, where a is the shortest side, b is the middle side, and c is the hypotenuse. Since the sides form a geometric progression, we know that:

b/a = c/b

Multiplying both sides by b, we get:

[tex]b^2/a = c[/tex]

Since a = 2, we can substitute this into the above equation to get:

[tex]b^2/2 = c[/tex]

We also know that the Pythagorean theorem applies, so we have:

[tex]a^2 + b^2 = c^2[/tex]

Substituting a = 2 and [tex]c = b^2/2[/tex] , we get:

[tex]2^2 + b^2 = (b^2/2)^2[/tex]

Simplifying this equation, we get:

[tex]4 + b^2 = b^4/4[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by 4, we get:

[tex]16 + 4b^2 = b^4[/tex]

Rearranging and factoring, we get:

[tex](b^2 - 4)(b^2 - 12) = 0[/tex]

Since b is a positive length, we can discard the solution[tex]b^2 = 12.[/tex] Therefore, we have:

[tex]b^2 = 4[/tex]

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

[tex]b = 2\sqrt{2 }[/tex]

Finally, we can use the equation [tex]c = b^2/2[/tex] to find the length of the hypotenuse:

[tex]c = (2\sqrt{2} )^2/2 = 4.[/tex]

For similar question on hypotenuse.

https://brainly.com/question/2217700

#SPJ11

2.23% is the probability of a city with a population of 200,000, and there will be exactly 2 accidental drownings per year.

The Poisson distribution, is useful for modeling the number of events (in this case, accidental drownings) in a fixed interval (here, a year). Given the average rate of 3.0 drownings per 100,000 people per year, we first need to find the expected number of drownings in a city with a population of 200,000.

Expected drownings per year = (3.0 drownings / 100,000 people) * 200,000 people = 6 drownings

Now, we can use the Poisson probability formula to calculate the probability of exactly 2 accidental drownings per year in this city:

P(X = k) = (λ^k * e^(-λ)) / k!

Here, X represents the number of drownings, k is the desired number of drownings (2 in this case), λ (lambda) is the expected number of drownings per year (6), e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.718), and k! is the factorial of k.

P(X = 2) = (6^2 * e^(-6)) / 2! = (36 * e^(-6)) / 2 = (36 * 0.002478) / 2 = 0.04461 / 2 = 0.022305

Therefore, the probability that in a city with a population of 200,000, there will be exactly 2 accidental drownings per year is approximately 0.0223 or 2.23%.

Know more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Based on the given information, it seems that the number of left-handed desks in each classroom is adequate.

Based on the given information, we can calculate the expected number of left-handed students in a classroom:

Expected number of left-handed students = (total number of students in a classroom) x (proportion of left-handed students in the population)

Expected number of left-handed students = 30 x 0.11

Expected number of left-handed students = 3.3

Since each classroom contains four left-handed desks, it seems that the number of left-handed desks is more than enough to accommodate the expected number of left-handed students. In fact, there may even be some unused left-handed desks in each classroom.

Therefore, based on the given information, it seems that the number of left-handed desks in each classroom is adequate.

for such more question on adequate

https://brainly.com/question/28033296

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that the giant sugar cube is a perfect cube, we can calculate its volume by using the formula:

Volume = edge length³

To find the edge length, we need to first calculate the amount of wood used per unit of volume, which is given by:

wood per unit volume = 213.5 m³ / 1 unit of volume

We don't know the unit of volume of the sugar cube, but we can use any consistent unit, such as meters, centimeters, or millimeters. Let's use meters for consistency with the given material amount.

Now, we can find the edge length by solving the following equation for x:

wood per unit volume = 213.5 m³ / x³

x³ = 213.5 m³ / wood per unit volume

x³ = 213.5 m³ / (213.5 m³ / 1 unit of volume)

x³ = 1 unit of volume

Therefore, the edge length of the giant sugar cube is 1 meter.

Finally, we can calculate the volume inside the giant sugar cube by using the formula:

Volume = edge length³

Volume = 1³ = 1 cubic meter

Therefore, the volume inside the giant sugar cube is 1 cubic meter.

True. Time series data refers to a collection of observations gathered over time, where the time dimension is a critical component of the data.

Each data point is linked to a specific point in time. In contrast, cross-sectional data is collected at a single point in time and does not have a time dimension. Therefore, the timing of each observation is crucial in time series data but not as important in cross-sectional data.

Time series data is a sequence of data points indexed in time order. It is used to track change over time.

Cross-sectional data is a snapshot of data at a specific point in time. It is used to compare different groups or variables .

Think about how the time at which each observation is made affects the analysis of time series data and cross-sectional data.

to learn more about Time series data click here:

brainly.com/question/29097191

#SPJ11

It takes approximately 52.7 hours for the activity of a sample of gallium-67 to fall to 6.73 percent of its original value.

The decay of radioactive substances is governed by the following equation:

[tex]N(t) = N_{0} e^{(-\lambda t)[/tex]

where:

N(t) is the amount of the substance at time t

N₀ is the initial amount of the substance

λ is the decay constant

t is time

The half-life of gallium-67 is 78.2 hours, which means that:

λ = ln(2)/t₁/₂ = ln(2)/78.2 = 0.00887 h⁻¹

Let N be the amount of gallium-67 remaining after time t, and N₀ be the initial amount. Then, we can use the above equation to find the time t required for the activity of the sample to fall to 6.73 percent of its original value:

N/N₀ = 0.0673

[tex]0.0673 = e^{(-\lambda t)}[/tex]

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(0.0673) = -λt

t = ln(1/0.0673)/λ

t = ln(14.84)/0.00887

t ≈ 52.7 hours

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/13818690

#SPJ11

37% of all voters are Democrats. The probability is 0.137, and the option that matches this answer is "0.137".

To find the probability that two randomly selected voters from the town are both Democrats, we need to use the formula for the probability of independent events:
P(A and B) = P(A) x P(B)
where A and B are independent events. In this case, A is the event that the first voter is a Democrat, and B is the event that the second voter is a Democrat.
The probability of the first voter being a Democrat is 0.37, since 37% of all voters in the town are Democrats. The probability of the second voter being a Democrat is also 0.37, since the selection of the first voter does not affect the probability of the second voter being a Democrat. Therefore:
P(A and B) = P(A) x P(B) = 0.37 x 0.37 = 0.1369
Rounding to three decimal places, we get a probability of 0.137. Therefore, the answer is 0.137, and the option that matches this answer is "0.137".

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

C  rate =   1 chapter / 9 hr   = 1/ 9    chap/hr

P rate = 1/6

together  :

1 chapter / ( c rate + p rate)  =   1 /( 1/9 + 1/6) =  1/ ( 2/18 + 3/18) = 1/ (5/18) =

    18/5 hr   = 3  3/5 hr

It would take Cynthia and Phillip 3.6 hours working together to proof a chapter of Hawkes Learning Systems' Introductory Algebra book.

To find out how long it would take Cynthia and Phillip working together to proof a chapter of Hawkes Learning Systems' Introductory Algebra book, we can use the work formula:

Work = Rate × Time

First, we'll find the individual rates for Cynthia and Phillip:
- [tex]Cynthia's rate:\frac{1 chapter}{9 hours}[/tex]
- [tex]Phillip's rate:\frac{1 chapter}{6 hours}[/tex]
Now, we'll add their rates together to find their combined rate:
[tex]Combined rate = \frac{1}{9}  + \frac{1}{6}[/tex]

To add these fractions, we need a common denominator, which is 18:
[tex]Combined rate = \frac{2}{18}  + \frac{3}{18}=\frac{5}{18}[/tex]

Now, we'll use the work formula to find the time it would take for them to complete the proofreading together. Since they're working on 1 chapter, we can set Work equal to 1:
[tex]1 = \frac{5}{18} (time)[/tex]

Next, we'll solve for Time:
[tex]Time = 1 (\frac{5}{18})[/tex]
[tex]Time=1 (\frac{18}{5})[/tex]
[tex]Time = \frac{18}{5} = 3.6 hours[/tex]

So, it would take Cynthia and Phillip 3.6 hours working together to proof a chapter of Hawkes Learning Systems' Introductory Algebra book.

To know more about  "Algebra" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29131718#

#SPJ11

The number of child tickets sold that day was 81.

To solve the problem, let's use algebra. Let x be the number of child tickets sold and 3x be the number of adult tickets sold. The total sales can then be expressed as:

6.40x + 9.60(3x) = 950.40

Simplifying this equation:

6.40x + 28.80x = 950.40

35.20x = 950.40

x = 27

This means that 27 child tickets were sold. However, the problem asks for the number of child tickets sold on Friday, when three times as many adult tickets were sold.

So the number of child tickets sold on Friday is:

3x = 3(27) = 81

Therefore, 81 adult tickets and 27 child tickets were sold on Friday, and the revenue was $950.40.

To know more about tickets sold, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28491872#

#SPJ11

The confidence levels for each bound are as follows:a. 80%,b. 98%,,c. 75%. The confidence levels To determine the confidence level for each of these large-sample one-sided confidence bounds, we will look at the critical values (Z-scores) given for each bound:

a. Upper bound: ¯x + 0.84s/√n
The critical value here is 0.84, which corresponds to a one-tailed Z-score for a 80% confidence level.

b. Lower bound: ¯x − 2.05s/√n
The critical value here is 2.05, which corresponds to a one-tailed Z-score for a 98% confidence level.

c. Upper bound: ¯x + 0.67s/√n
The critical value here is 0.67, which corresponds to a one-tailed Z-score for a 75% confidence level.

So, the confidence levels for each bound are as follows:
a. 80%
b. 98%
c. 75%

Learn more about confidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/29048041

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.2515384615

Step-by-step explanation:

she makes 5/13

5/13*0.654

The probability of both representatives being girls is 39/158, or approximately 0.247.

To find the probability of both representatives being girls, we first need to find the probability of selecting a girl as the first representative, and then the probability of selecting another girl as the second representative, given that the first one was a girl.

The probability of selecting a girl as the first representative is 40/80, or 1/2, since there are 40 girls in the group of 80 students.

Once a girl has been chosen as the first representative, there will be 39 girls left in the group of 79 students (since one student has already been chosen), so the probability of selecting another girl as the second representative is 39/79.

To find the probability of both events occurring (selecting a girl as the first representative and then selecting another girl as the second representative), we multiply the probabilities together:

1/2 x 39/79 = 39/158

Therefore, the probability is 39/158, or approximately 0.247.

More on probability: https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

According to the flood recurrence interval equation, a flood that occurs in 2021, after 149 years of record keeping, and is the third largest ever recorded has a recurrence interval of approximately 50 years.

The flood recurrence interval equation is a statistical method used to estimate the likelihood of a flood of a certain magnitude occurring in any given year. It is based on historical records of floods and takes into account the size and frequency of floods that have occurred in the past.

In this case, the flood that occurred in 2021 is the third largest ever recorded. Based on the historical records of floods over the past 149 years, this flood has a recurrence interval of approximately 50 years. This means that there is a 2% chance of a flood of this magnitude occurring in any given year.

It is important to note that the flood recurrence interval equation is not a perfect predictor of future floods. It is only an estimation based on historical records. Other factors such as climate change and changes in land use can also impact the likelihood and severity of floods.

In conclusion, the recurrence interval for a flood that occurred in 2021, after 149 years of record keeping and is the third largest ever recorded is approximately 50 years. However, it is important to remember that the accuracy of this estimation may vary based on several factors.

To learn more about  interval equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12165844#

#SPJ11

8.) The surface area of the given shape would be =532ft²

9.) The surface area of the given circle = 24.62cm²

For question 8.)

To calculate the surface area of the square based pyramid the formula given below is used;

S.A = b² + 2bs

where;

b = 14ft

s = 12 ft

S.A = 14² + 2(14×12)

= 196+ 2(168)

= 196+336

= 532ft²

For question 9:

To calculate the area of the circle, the formula that should be used is given as follows:

S.A = πr²

where:

r = 2.8cm

π = 3.14

S.A = 3.14×2.8×2.8

= 24.62cm²

https://brainly.com/question/28470545

#SPJ1

The answer to the question is 7

The leakage current ratio of a transistor can be determined by comparing the leakage current in different configurations. In this case, we are given the parameters y, n, Pr, VDD, T, and VTHo.

The leakage current ratio is the ratio of the leakage current in two different configurations. In this case, we need to compare the leakage current when VDD is 0 and 0.2 V.

Using the given parameters and the formula for the leakage current, we can calculate the leakage current for both configurations.

When VDD is 0, the leakage current is given by:

I_leakage = y * Pr * exp[(VTHo-VDD)/n*VT]

Plugging in the values, we get:

I_leakage(0) = 1 * 0.35 * exp[(0.4-0)/0.1*VT] = 7.79 × 10^-10 A

When VDD is 0.2 V, the leakage current is given by:

I_leakage = y * Pr * exp[(VTHo-VDD)/n*VT]

Plugging in the values, we get:

I_leakage(0.2) = 1 * 0.35 * exp[(0.4-0.2)/0.1*VT] = 5.11 × 10^-9 A

Therefore, the leakage current ratio is:

I_leakage(0.2)/I_leakage(0) = (5.11 × 10^-9)/(7.79 × 10^-10) = 6.56

Rounded to the nearest integer, the leakage current ratio is 7.

To learn more about leakage current : brainly.com/question/29545860

#SPJ11

To find the probability of obtaining exactly 5 successes in 8 independent trials, we can use the binomial probability formula. Let X be the number of successes in 8 trials, then we have:

P(X = 5) = (8 choose 5) * (3/8)^5 * (5/8)^3

where (8 choose 5) is the number of ways to choose 5 trials out of 8. Using a calculator, we can evaluate this probability to be:

P(X = 5) = 0.2254 (rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth)

Therefore, the probability of obtaining exactly 5 successes in 8 independent trials where the probability of success on each trial is 3/8 is 0.2254.
Hi! I'm happy to help you with your probability question. To find the probability of exactly 5 successes in 8 independent trials with a success probability of 3/8, we'll use the binomial probability formula. The formula is:

P(X=k) = C(n,k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where:
- P(X=k) is the probability of exactly k successes
- C(n,k) is the combination function (n! / [k!(n-k)!]), representing the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials
- n is the total number of trials (8 in this case)
- k is the number of successes we want (5 in this case)
- p is the probability of success on each trial (3/8 in this case)

Using the formula, we get:

P(X=5) = C(8,5) * (3/8)^5 * (1-3/8)^(8-5)
P(X=5) = (8! / [5!(8-5)!]) * (3/8)^5 * (5/8)^3
P(X=5) ≈ 0.2188

So, the probability of obtaining exactly 5 successes in 8 independent trials is approximately 0.2188 or 21.88% when rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth.

Learn more about probability here : brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

In order for the senator to have a confidence level of 90% that the sample proportion will not deviate from the actual proportion by more than 5%, they must conduct a survey of at least 273 voters.

To estimate the proportion of United States voters who favor abolishing the electoral college with a 90% confidence level and a margin of error of 5%, we need to use the formula :

n = (z² * p * (1-p)) / E²

where n is the sample size, z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (1.645 for 90% confidence level), p is the estimated proportion (0.5 is a conservative estimate since we don't know the true proportion), and E is the margin of error in proportion (0.05).

Plugging in the values, we get n = (1.645² * 0.5 * (1-0.5)) / 0.05² = 272.25. Since we cannot have a non-integer sample size, we round up to the nearest integer, so the minimum sample size needed is 273.

Therefore, the senator needs to survey at least 273 voters to be 90% confident that the sample proportion will not differ from the true proportion by more than 5%.

To know more about confidence level, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22851322#

#SPJ11

The appropriate method for calculating the degrees of freedom associated with a correlation coefficient is  c. n - 1.

The degrees of freedom refer to the number of values in the dataset that can vary independently. In the context of correlation coefficient calculation, the degrees of freedom help determine the significance level of the relationship between the two variables being analyzed.

The reason we use n - 1 as the formula is that when examining the relationship between two variables, we are essentially comparing the differences between each data point and their corresponding means.

Since the correlation coefficient calculation requires that the sum of these differences equal zero, the last difference is essentially determined by the preceding differences. As a result, there are n - 1 independent values or degrees of freedom in this calculation.

By using the correct formula for degrees of freedom, we can more accurately determine the significance of the correlation coefficient and subsequently, the strength of the relationship between the two variables .The correct answer is c.

Know more about  correlation coefficient   here:

https://brainly.com/question/28196194

#SPJ11

By using a seasonal sales forecast, Gabi can better plan her inventory and staffing levels throughout the year, which can help her optimize her business operations and maximize profits.

To create this forecast, she will need to estimate the expected sales for each month based on historical data and market trends.

Here's an example of how Gabi could create a seasonal sales forecast:

Start with historical sales data: Gabi can use the previous owner's sales records to get an idea of how much revenue the store generated in each month. She should look for patterns or trends in the data that can help her predict future sales.

Identify seasonal trends: Based on the information she has been given, Gabi knows that 60 percent of sales occur during the Christmas holiday season. She should also consider other seasonal factors that could affect sales, such as the weather, local events, and school holidays.

Determine the baseline sales: Gabi can calculate the baseline sales by dividing the non-holiday sales (40 percent) by the number of non-holiday months (eight). This will give her an estimate of the average monthly sales during the non-holiday period.

Adjust for seasonal factors: Gabi should adjust her baseline sales estimate based on the seasonal trends she identified. For example, she might increase sales projections for November and December to reflect the holiday season, and adjust sales projections for other months based on other seasonal factors.

Review and adjust: Gabi should regularly review her sales forecast and adjust it as needed based on actual sales performance and any changes in market conditions.

for such more question on seasonal sales

https://brainly.com/question/14997249

#SPJ11

The statement that best describes the result of the data that Maya collected, would be D. Small - size drinks cost more than $ 1. 00 at restaurants in Maya's city.

We see that in Maya's city, there was no entry in the $ 0.91 to $ 1.00 category. This shows that there are no restaurants (according to the sample) that sell small - sized drinks for less than $ 1.00

The other statements are false because the largest restaurants fall in the $ 1. 51 to $ 1. 60 category and Maya conducted the sampling at 50 restaurants because there were 10 restaurants per sample.

Find out more on samples at https://brainly.com/question/27819027

#SPJ1

The true population mean of monthly incomes for workers in the factory falls between $1806 and $2263 with 98% of confidence intervals.

To calculate the 98% confidence interval for the mean of the population, we need to use the formula:

CI = sample mean ± Zα/2 * (σ/√n)

Where the sample mean, Zα/2 is the critical value for the given level of confidence (98% in this case), σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

First, we need to find the sample mean from the given data:

sample mean = (2120 + 1980 + 2300 + ... + 1940) / 20 = 2034.5

Next, we need to find the critical value (Zα/2) using a standard normal distribution table or calculator. For a 98% confidence interval, the critical value is approximately 2.33.

Now, we can plug in the values and calculate the confidence interval:

CI = 2034.5 ± 2.33 * (518/√20) = (1806, 2263)

Therefore, we can say with 98% confidence that the true population mean of monthly incomes for workers in the factory falls between $1806 and $2263. This means that if we were to take many random samples of the same size from the population and calculate their confidence intervals, approximately 98% of these intervals would contain the true population mean.

To know more about confidence intervals, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31420373#

#SPJ11

If an investigator is getting responses very close to each other when assessing skinfold thickness 5 consecutive times, it is a sign that the measurements are precise or reliable.

Measurements refer to the process of quantifying physical quantities or properties such as length, mass, time, temperature, and more. The aim of measurements is to obtain accurate and reliable data that can be used for various purposes, such as scientific research, industrial applications, engineering, and construction.

Measurement involves comparing an unknown quantity with a known standard or unit of measurement. For example, length can be measured using a ruler, mass can be measured using a scale, and time can be measured using a clock. The units of measurement used can vary depending on the system of measurement used, such as the metric system or the imperial system.

To learn more about Measurements visit here:

brainly.com/question/2107310

#SPJ4

Answer:

The correct answer is D.

“My mother always used to say: The older you get, the better you get, unless you’re a banana.”

—Rose (Betty White), The Golden Girls

Since the calculated t-value (3.27) is greater than the critical t-value (2.62), we reject the null hypothesis.

As a sociologist, you aim to determine if city dwellers have higher stress levels than suburbanites. To test this hypothesis, you would conduct a two-sample t-test comparing the means of the two groups.

The null hypothesis (H 0) is that there is no significant difference in stress levels between city dwellers and suburbanites, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) states that city dwellers have higher stress levels.

Given the data, city dwellers have a mean stress level (M1) of 13.2 with a standard deviation (SD1) of 3.2, while suburbanites have a mean stress level (M2) of 11.5 with a standard deviation (SD2) of 2.1. The sample sizes are 80 for city dwellers (n1) and 70 for suburbanites (n2).

First, calculate the standard error (SE) of the difference between means:

SE = sqrt((SD1^2/n1) + (SD2^2/n2)) = sqrt((3.2^2/80) + (2.1^2/70)) ≈ 0.52

Next, calculate the t-value:

t = (M1 - M2) / SE = (13.2 - 11.5) / 0.52 ≈ 3.27

Now, determine the critical t-value using a one-tailed t-test with an alpha level of 0.01 and degrees of freedom (df) equal to n1 + n2 - 2 = 80 + 70 - 2 = 148. From a t-table, the critical t-value is approximately 2.62.

Since the calculated t-value (3.27) is greater than the critical t-value (2.62), we reject the null hypothesis. In conclusion, there is strong evidence to suggest that city dwellers experience significantly higher levels of stress compared to suburbanites at the 0.01 alpha level.

To learn more about null hypothesis click here

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The value of {x} is 8 and the measure of angle A is 30°.

Refer to the image attached. We can see that ∠A and ∠B form a pair of co - interior angles. This means that we can write the relation as -

∠A + ∠B = 180°

So, we can write that -

6x - 18 + 14x + 38 = 180°

20x + 20 = 180°

20x = 160°

{x} = 8

∠A = 6x - 18

∠A = 6 x 8 - 18

∠A = 30°

So, the value of {x} is 8 and the measure of angle A is 30°.

To solve more questions on angles, visit the link-

brainly.com/question/11805053

#SPJ1

The area of the original trapezoid is B. half the area of the rectangle in step 4.

Given a trapezoid which has the lengths of the parallel bases as b₁ and b₂.

We know that,

Area of a trapezoid = (b₁ + b₂) h / 2, where h is the height between the two bases.

Two trapezoids are joined to get a parallelogram and then rearrange it to form a rectangle.

Area of a rectangle = Length × width

Here, length = b₁ + b₂

Width = height of the trapezoid = h

Area of rectangle in step 4 = (b₁ + b₂) h

Area of trapezoid is half of this.

Hence the correct option is B.

Learn more about trapezoids here :

https://brainly.com/question/8643562

#SPJ1

The volume of one piece of pizza is π cubic inches.

To find the volume of one piece of pizza, we need to first find the total

volume of the pizza and then divide by the number of pieces.

Find the volume of the entire pizza.

The pizza is a cylinder with a height (thickness) of 1/3 inches and a

diameter of 12 inches.

We can find the radius by dividing the diameter by 2, so the radius is 6

inches. The formula for the volume of a cylinder is

V = πr²h,

where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height.

V = π(6²)(1/3) V = π(36)(1/3) V = 12π cubic inches

Divide the total volume by the number of pieces.

There are 12 congruent pieces, so we need to divide the total volume by 12.

Volume of one piece = (12π cubic inches) / 12 The 12's cancel out, leaving

us with: Volume of one piece = π cubic inches

So, the volume of one piece of pizza is π cubic inches.

for such more question on  volume

https://brainly.com/question/6204273

#SPJ11