If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract is enforceable. True
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract "admits" in court that a contract was made, the contract, however admitted, will be enforceable.Contrary to popular belief, oral contracts are legally binding. They are usually not in your best interests and result in a "he said, she said" argument. However, as long as there is sufficient evidence, a court will enforce an oral agreement. However, there is one exception to this rule, and it is known as the Statute of Frauds. An oral agreement can be legally enforceable if it complies with a law known as the statute of frauds.
Lerarn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ4
Based on the Upfront article and the excerpts from McDonald’s statement, why do you think the movement to lower the voting age had bipartisan support? *
From the McDonald’s statement we learn about a blind child in the story "A View From the Bridge." He approaches a man on a bridge and requests his assistance in capturing a fish. The youngster is blind, but the dad does not instantly understand this.
The title "A View from the Bridge" was most likely chosen to suggest that the guy serves as a link between the youngster and the outside world. The man is first reluctant to talk since it is not immediately clear what is going on. The father starts to view the world, nonetheless, from the viewpoint of a kid once it becomes clear. This brings attention to the essay's main idea. the "bridge's vista"
The unique perspective the man gains after experiencing the world through the eyes of a youngster is known as the "view from the bridge."
For such more question on McDonald’s statement.
https://brainly.com/question/15401924
#SPJ4
There are two options for question 4, choose one question to answer.
What is Sociology?
What is Social structure?
What is the difference between the Gallup Poll and their survey on crime and the Justice Department survey on crime?
Create a diagram/matrix labeling both horizontal and and vertical structures and your place within it. (2 points) OR
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues? (2 points)
Helppp pleaseeee
Answer:
1. Sociology is the scientific study of society, including patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture. It focuses on the social, cultural, and political factors that shape and influence human behavior and societies.
2. Social structure refers to the organized patterns of relationships within a society. It includes the social institutions, norms, and values that shape and influence the behavior of individuals and groups within society.
3. The Gallup Poll is a public opinion polling organization that conducts surveys on a wide range of topics, including crime. The Justice Department survey on crime is a statistical survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice that collects data on crime and criminal justice in the United States. One key difference between the two surveys is that the Gallup Poll is a private organization, while the Justice Department survey is conducted by a government agency. Additionally, the Gallup Poll may use different methods and sample sizes than the Justice Department survey, which could result in different findings and conclusions.
I can't do the diagram for you.
Personal troubles that I have encountered that may also be public issues:
Lack of access to affordable healthcare: I have struggled to afford healthcare for myself and my family, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community and beyond. This is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for public health and the overall well-being of our society.
Housing insecurity: I have struggled to afford stable and secure housing at times in my life, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community. Housing insecurity is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for economic stability, social mobility, and overall well-being.
within how many days of the last instance of harassment or discrimination must charges be filed with the eeoc?
Employees must file a complaint with the United States within 180 calendar days from the date the discrimination occurred. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports discrimination.
The EEOC enforces laws that discriminate against people in the workplace based on race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity and sexual orientation), religion, disability, age (over 40), or genetic information.
Harassment is prohibited.
Laws enforced by the EEOC also protect you from workplace harassment and penalties for filing a harassment complaint by you or someone you have a close relationship with (such as a relative or close friend).
This is called the right to protection from retaliation.
To learn more about ‘EEOC’, here;
https://brainly.com/question/17245692
#SPJ4
At the beginning of a trial, only the defendant's attorney makes an opening statement.
True
False
False. Only the defendant's attorney makes an opening statement at the start of a trial.
Lawyers who represent a defendant in a criminal case are formally known as "criminal defense attorneys." A defense attorney represents the defendant in court in both civil and criminal cases. General lawyers practice law and represent clients in business and other general legal matters. A criminal defense attorney, on the other hand, is an expert in trial tactics and defense strategies required for the client and their family's case to be successfully resolved. Defense Attorneys form relationships with clients by determining their legal needs, providing counsel, and assisting them in understanding their legal options.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/28143061
#SPJ4
What is the law of Independent Assortment and the law of segregation?
The Law of Independent Assortment in Genetics tends to state that the inheritance of the one pair of the genes is independent ofthe inheritance which is of another pair.
The Law of segregation tends to state that the every individual tends to possess the two alleles and here only one allele is said to be passed on to the offspring. Thus, this has to do with 1 gene and here the allocation of the gene copies is random.
Whereas, the Law of Independent Assortment in Genetics states that the allele of one gene tends to separate independently which is of an allele of the another gene. For instance, two-hybrid rabbits are crossed.
Hence, the law of Independent Assortment and the law of segregation in genetics were explained above.
To learn more about the Law of Segregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1594166
#SPJ4
Leah gains access to government records and alters certain dates and amounts in her favor. This is a. embezzlement. b. forgery. c. larceny. d. no crime.
The correct answer is B) forgery. Leah obtains access to official documents and changes specific dates and quantities to her advantage. This is a fabrication of embezzlement.
Altering, using fake documents and tools, and writing falsely on any documents with the intent to fool the other are all examples of forgery and fabrication. When someone else signs or when someone writes something that is false, it happens.
False document utterance is a serious offence that carries a penalty. Documents that can be falsified include checks, negotiable instruments, contracts, wills, and deeds, to name a few. However, forgery also includes some documents that are routinely used in the business sector despite having no legal standing, such as a fake letter of recommendation for employment.
Read more about records embezzlement at
https://brainly.com/question/12882997
#SPJ4
What is Mendel's 1st and 2nd law?
Mendel's first law explains that two copies of alleles of a particular gene segregate into gametes while second law states during gamete formation, the alleles of each gene segregate from each other.
Law of dominance
According to the law of dominance, hybrid offspring inherit only phenotypic dominant traits. Suppressed alleles are called recessive traits, and alleles that determine traits are called dominant traits.
Law of segregation
The law of segregation states that during the production of gametes, her two copies of each genetic element are separated, so that offspring receive one her factor from each parent.
In other words, pairs of alleles (alternate forms of genes) segregate during gametogenesis and combine randomly during fertilization.
To learn more about 'Mendel's law', here:
https://brainly.com/question/23067535
#SPJ4
Hi how do I create a answer on this thing i want achievments
Answer: You just click the answer button
Which of the following will cause demand for EMTS and paramedics to keep increasing?
Aplans for vast expansion of hospital triage centers all over the nation
Bdecline in doctors, nurses, psychiatrists
C increased EMT and paramedic academic programs
Dnatural disasters, car accidents, violence, and natural physical events
Answer:
natural disasters, car accidents, violence, and natural physical events
Explanation:
ion got no explanation, quizlet helped me
What was Mendel's explanation for his observation?
Mendel derived his first concept, the principle of uniformity, from this straightforward observation. According to this theory, every offspring from a cross like this—where the parents differ by only one trait—will look the same.
Mendel also conducted tests to determine the results of cross-breeding plants with two or more pure-bred features. He discovered that each attribute has its own 3:1 ratio and was inherited independently of the others. This is the independent assortment guiding concept.
Mendel came to the conclusion that the traits might be split into expressed and latent features after gathering his findings for tens of thousands of plants. He referred to these qualities as being dominant and recessive, respectively.
Mendel noticed that all of the F1 plants were the same. Like one of the two parents, each of them possessed spherical yellow seeds. However, the F2 generation of plants produced by the self-pollinated F1 generation displayed every feasible combination of the two traits.
For more questions on Mendel's Explanation
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
The Implied consent law states that : a. You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer. b. You can agree to plea bargain if arrested for DUI. c. you will lose your license for six months if convicted.
d. your license will automatically be canceled if you are convicted of
d.u.i.
The Implied consent law states that option A: You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer.
According to the implied consent statute, when a law enforcement official requests that you submit to chemical testing of your breath, blood, or urine to discover whether you have consumed alcohol or drugs, you have given your consent. Therefore, option A proves to be he right choice.
Law enforcement organizations employ implied consent statutes as a tactic to obtain proof that you were driving while intoxicated. Without a BAC test, a DUI charge may still be brought against you. However, the results of these tests show that you were inebriated, which might be used against you in a DUI case. Even some states claim that the legislation governing implied consent applies to initial breathalyzer testing (PBT). A PBT is essentially another kind of field sobriety test that law enforcement does to gauge a subject's level of intoxication.
To know more about implied consent law, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/1283484
#SPJ4
What type of government Thoreau prefers at the beginning of civil disobedience?
Thoreau prefers a laissez faire type of government that is a capitalist form.
The phrase “that government is best which governs least” is most often attributed to Henry David Thoreau. He sued this in his 1849 “Civil Disobedience”
According to him, the less the government held matters of governance in its hand, the better it would be for the citizens of that country.
He often criticized the government's lack of consideration towards the welfare of the citizens.
He also used the term machine to describe the political apparatus of the government where it sued the 'mass of man' for its own benefits.
A laissez faire form of government would mean relatively lesser power in the hands of the government and more autonomy in the hands of individuals even if restricted to areas of economic interest alone.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
a successful defense releases the defendant from partial or full liability for a tortious act.
a. true
b. false
A successful defense absolves the defendant of partial or total liability for a tortious act committed.
A term used to describe tortious behavior. Tortious behavior is thus defined as any behavior (other than breach of contract) that can be sued for as a civil wrong. Tort liability means that someone is held responsible for wrongdoing (other than under contract.). Torts are associated with civil court claims. It is a branch of English common law intended to right a wrong (violation of common law, social norms, or civil law) without resorting to criminal punishment. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the tortious acts of its servants. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the acts of omission and commission, voluntary or involuntary, and brings it before a court of law.
Learn more about tortious here:
https://brainly.com/question/29312384
#SPJ4
Does the Supreme Court protect constitutional rights?
The Supreme Court does indeed uphold constitutional rights. These courts are, nevertheless, occasionally referred to as "constitutional courts."
For instance, because it was one of the first courts to find a statute to be unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of the United States is regarded as the oldest constitutional court in the world.
The Supreme Court, which serves as the final arbitrator of law, upholds the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans.
In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's advocate and interpreter.
In this system, the Supreme Court has a challenging job since it can strike down legislation or executive orders that, in its expert opinion, are unconstitutional.
To learn more about Constitution, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
What is the main role of the executive branch of government?
The main role of the executive branch of government is the enforcement of law in the country.
The President of the United States, is given control over the Executive Branch. He also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
The regular enforcement and implementation of federal legislation is the responsibility of the Cabinet and independent federal agencies.
The Constitution provides very little guidance for how the executive branch should be set up.
The "executive departments" that served as the foundation for the cabinet are mentioned. While relying mostly on the White House staff, a president will consult cabinet members for guidance in their respective fields.
However, cabinet secretaries are typically in charge of overseeing the agencies they lead.
To know more about the executive branch, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18052177
#SPJ4
is the property of being physically or mentally capable.
A . Grit
B. Individualism
C. Self confidence
D. Strength
Answer:
D.Strength
ALL done
Broker Audrey has a listing agreement with seller Scarlett. One of Audrey's salespeople commits a license law violation while interacting with Scarlett. Audrey
1 could be responsible due to vicarious liability.
2 cannot be responsible for the actions of others as a broker even if she knew they were breaking the law.
3 will not receive as large of a commission.
4 should void the listing agreement.
In case of Audrey's salesperson violating license law, Audrey could be held responsible due to vicarious liability, which means option A is correct.
Listing agreement is the legal contract made between the service broker and the property owner which consists of exclusive rights to sell listing. Thus the right of selling the property to a new customer is given to the broker. If any of the employee from the broker's side breaks the law, then they are liable for the compensation and punishment. Vicarious liability is the responsibility one individual has over the actions committed by other. It is caused due to negligence of the top employee and and breach of duty bound care. It can occur due to lack of communication between the broker and the salesperson.
Learn more about listing agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28474097
#SPJ4
An attempt to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions is termed
a. theories.
b. case studies.
c. data collection.
d. causation determination.
Theories are attempts to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions.
While there are numerous sociological theories about crime, four major perspectives on deviance exist: structural functionalism, social strain typology, conflict theory, and labeling theorCesare Lombroso founded the Italian positivist school of criminology, which argued that a criminal mind was inherited and could be identified by physical characteristics and defects.Behavioral intention - This refers to the motivational factors that influence a given behavior, with the stronger the intention to perform the behavior, the more likely it will be performed. Subjective norms - This is the belief that the majority of people approve or disapprove of the behavior.
Learn mpore about behavior here:
https://brainly.com/question/28362085
#SPJ4
Which statement is true regarding how private and federal loans use your credit score (borrowing history) when approving applications a. Neither federal nor private loans at your credit score b. Only federal loans look at your credit score c. only private loans look at your credit score d. both federal ans private loans look carefully at your credit score
The statement which is true regarding how private and federal loans use your credit score (borrowing history) when they are approving applications is that, only private loans tend to look at your credit score.
There are most federal loans which do not require a credit score, but there are the private loans which tend to typically require a credit inquiry, and so if one is applying for loan, then having good credit can help them land a competitive interest rate.
However, if you are considering a private student loan in order to pay for the school, you then need to know about qualifying. So, the private loans are nonfederal loans, which are made by a lender such as a bank. Whereas, a private loan can also be from one private individual or entity to another.
To learn more about the private loans here:
https://brainly.com/question/9761825
#SPJ4
What is Blackstone known for?
Sir William Blackstone was an English jurist, magistrate, and Tory politician, best known for writing commentaries on England law. William Blackstone made common law records.
He is famous for writing commentaries on English law. His four volumes of papers deal with ``human rights'', ``object rights'', ``private injustices'' and ``public injustices''.
Blackstone intended his work as an examination of common law as it developed in England. His work was also used in early US courts.
William Blackstone was important because he wrote a widely acclaimed commentary on English law that analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of English law.
To know more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133255
#SPJ4
All budgetary changes have consequences.
Describe the impact of the three largest cuts you made. How would these cuts impact the economy and the president’s reelection chances?
Explain your answer in at least four complete sentences.
Answer:
Explanation:
I'm sorry, I cannot answer your question about the specific cuts you made as I do not have any information about what cuts you are referring to or their context. In general, cutting a budget can have a variety of different impacts depending on what the budget is for and the size of the cut.
For example, cutting the budget for a government program that provides assistance to low-income families could have a negative impact on those families and on the economy as a whole, as they may have less money to spend, which can lead to slower economic growth. Similarly, cutting the budget for infrastructure projects could also have a negative impact on the economy by slowing economic growth and leading to higher unemployment.
On the other hand, cutting the budget for a government program that is inefficient or duplicative could have a positive impact on the economy by freeing up resources that can be used more effectively elsewhere.
Regarding the impact on the president's reelection chances, the impact would depend on how the public perceive the budget cuts, their approval of the actions, and how those budget cuts are perceived to have affected the economy and their daily life. A strong economy tends to bode well for the reelection of a president, but if people begin to feel the negative effects of budget cuts and those cuts are perceived negatively by the public, it could impact the president's approval rating, and could decrease the chances of being reelected.
cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
Answer:
The Federal Court
Explanation:
What role does the executive branch play in interpreting the law?
The executive branch plays no role in interpreting the law.
The interpretation of law is the distinct function of the judiciary.
The role of the executive is the administration and governance of the state. The legislature is tasked with the function of creating the law and amending it as it deems fit.
This type of distribution of powers amongst the executive, the legislature and the judiciary rests on the doctrine of separation of powers.
The Federal Courts are the sole custodians of the Rule of law. They decide whether a law passes the test of constitutionality and also interpret laws in the right light.
They adhere to strict principles of natural justice and apply law to the case in hand keeping in mind the contours of judicial restraint.
To know more about the interpretation of law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10527637
#SPJ4
What are the three types of deterrence? Apply ideas on deterrence from noteworthy cases that have happened in the last 5 years. Or you can use examples as displayed in American cinema (3).
By terrifying a particular defendant with punishment, specific deterrence reduces crime. By terrifying the public with the punishment of a specific defendant, general deterrence reduces crime. By removing a defendant from society, incapacitation reduces crime.
What three elements make up deterrence theory?These three essential elements, known as the "3 Cs" (Severity, Certainty, and Celerity) of punishment, make up traditional deterrence theory.
Which of the three deterrence factors do you think is most crucial?One of the three deterrence components. Certainty is the probability that a person will be apprehended and punished for a crime they have committed. The most crucial of the three components is certainty.
To Know more about particular defendant
https://brainly.com/question/14527091
#SPJ1
Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues?
Answer:
One personal trouble I have encountered that may also be a public issue is the increasing cost of healthcare. Even with health insurance, many people are struggling to pay for necessary medical treatments due to rising costs. This issue affects a large number of people, making it a public issue.
Explanation:
Each of the 15 Executive Department are headed by a_______ except for the Department of Jutice, which i headed by the_______
Each agency is headed by a secretary from that department, with the exception of the Department of Justice, whose leader is known as the attorney general.
Every agency is headed by a secretary from that department, with the exception of the Department of Justice, which is led by the attorney general. The heads of the executive departments are chosen by the president; they formally accept their positions after being confirmed by the US Senate and serve at his or her pleasure. Usually acting as the president's advisory body, the US Cabinet is an executive body. The people who make up this group are the department leaders. In the Opinion Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the phrase "principal Officer in each of the executive Agencies" is used to describe the heads of executive departments. The heads of executive departments are in the order of succession to the president in the event of a vacancy in that position, following the vice president, the speaker of the House, and the president pro tempore of the Senate.
To know more about attorney general click on the below link:
brainly.com/question/29520955
#SPJ4
Can the Supreme Court remove a justice?
The Justices can only be removed through impeachment, and the Constitution stipulates that they serve for as long as they see fit.
Yes, through the same process that was used to remove a U.S. president from office: impeachment. After the House decided to impeach, the Senate would hold a trial and decide whether to remove the justice. In Article II, section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, the grounds for impeachment and conviction are listed as treason, bribery, or other serious offences. Only Samuel Chase, a judge of the Supreme Court, has ever been impeached. In 1804, the associate justice was charged with "arbitrary and repressive administration of cases" and it was said that political bias was a factor in his judgments.
He was ruled not guilty in 1805 after going through with his Senate trial.
To learn more about Impeachment, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ4
Can some one help me I have to write in 200 words about “ What are the top 1–2 soft skills you currently have that you can showcase in a resume?
How has your current (or a past) job helped you acquire or polish these skills?”
Can some one write something for me in 200 words about this please ? And thank you it’s due today and I need help
Answer: I possess a strong set of soft skills that I have developed throughout my career. The top two skills that stand out are communication and problem solving.
Communication is essential in all aspects of life, but especially in the workplace. I have developed excellent communication skills through my current job as a customer service representative. Everyday I am required to speak with customers and provide them with the best possible service. My job has helped me become a better listener, more articulate and able to express myself effectively.
Problem solving is another important skill that I have acquired and perfected during my job. I am often faced with difficult problems that require quick and accurate solutions. My current job has enabled me to use my creativity and sharp analytical skills to come up with innovative solutions to customer issues. I am confident that I can bring my problem solving skills to any other job I may pursue.
These two skills are highly valued and are essential in many job roles, and I believe showcasing them in my resume will be beneficial. I have worked hard to refine and hone my communication and problem-solving skills and I am confident that I can use them to make a positive contribution to any organization.
Explanation: I'm not sure if I made it on time but I hope this helps.
jeff is accused of shoplifting at a department store he is arrested goes to trial and is found not guilty the district attorney however after the trail is given new videotape evidence that jeff did in fact shoplift jeff is brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting
Answer:
This is known as double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is the prosecution of a person for the same crime more than once. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution includes a prohibition against being "subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," and most state constitutions have similar clauses.
Explanation:
In the scenario you've provided, Jeff has already been found not guilty of shoplifting in a trial. If he is then brought to trial again for the same act of shoplifting, this would constitute double jeopardy and would be unconstitutional. However, there is an exception to this rule: if new evidence comes to light that was not available at the time of the first trial, and that evidence might reasonably have led to a different outcome, a person may be retried. But in such case it should be cleared that this new evidence is that substantial which would change the outcome of the trial, otherwise it will be considered as double jeopardy.