I just need the answers of all of them please

The distance around the track along the inside edge of each lane is shown below.

We have to use

Perimeter = 2 x longer dimension+ π x shorter dimensions

So, Distance between lanes

= 20/8

= 2.5 yards

Now, the perimeters are

Lane 1:

= 2 x 80 + π x 56

= 335.84 yards

Lane 2:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 2 x 2.5)

=  351.54 yards

Lane 3:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 4 x 2.5)

=  367.24 yards

Lane 4:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 6 x 2.5)

= 382.94 yards

Lane 5:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 8 x 2.5)

= 398.64 yards

Lane 6:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 10 x 2.5)

= 414.34 yards

Lane 7:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 12 x 2.5)

= 430.04 yards

Lane 8:

= 2 x 80 + π x (56+ 14 x 2.5)

= 445.74 yards

Learn more about Perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/29595517

#SPJ1

The horizontal and vertical asymptotes of the function are given below.

We have,

The function f(x) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is equal to the degree of the denominator (both are 2), and the leading coefficients of both are the same.

The vertical asymptotes are given by setting the denominator equal to zero and solving for x.

In this case, 2x² - 1 = 0, which gives x = ±√(1/2).

Therefore, the vertical asymptotes are x = √(1/2) and x = -√(1/2).

The function g(x) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator (2 > 0).

The vertical asymptote is at x = 0 because the denominator is equal to zero when x = 0.

The function g(t) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is equal to the degree of the denominator (1), and the leading coefficients of both are the same.

The function has no vertical asymptotes because the denominator is never equal to zero.

The function f(x) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is equal to the degree of the denominator (1), and the leading coefficients of both are the same.

The function has no vertical asymptotes because the denominator is never equal to zero.

The function f(x) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is equal to the degree of the denominator (1), and the leading coefficients of both are the same.

The function has a vertical asymptote at x = -1 because the denominator is equal to zero when x = -1.

The function h(x) has no horizontal asymptote because the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator (3 > 2).

The function has no vertical asymptotes because the denominator is never equal to zero.

The function g(t) has a horizontal asymptote at y = 2 because as t approaches infinity, the expression (1 - 2)^2 approaches zero, so the function approaches 2.

The function has no vertical asymptotes because the denominator is never equal to zero.

Thus,

The horizontal and vertical asymptotes of the function are given above

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ1

The sample in this argument is "People interviewed in the 10 city survey who watched a 3-D movie".

This is because the researchers selected a random sample of people who watched 3-D movies in the ten major cities, and then interviewed them about their experience of physical discomfort. The 893 people who were interviewed constitute the sample, and their responses were used to draw conclusions about the broader population of people who watch 3-D movies.

Therefore, the sample is a subset of the population of all people who watch 3-D movies, and the researchers used this sample to make inferences about the larger population. The sample in this argument is the people interviewed in the 10 city survey who watched a 3-D movie.

The researchers conducted their study by interviewing a total of 893 individuals across ten major cities at randomly selected movie theaters showing 3-D movies. This sample was used to draw conclusions about the broader population of people who watch 3-D movies and their experiences with physical discomfort, motion sickness, or headaches.

To learn more about random sample click here

brainly.com/question/31523301

#SPJ11

System of equations that is satisfied by the solution is C) x + 2y = 10 and x − y = 6.

The solution shown in the graph satisfies the equations x + 2y = 10 and x − y = 6, which means the answer is C. To see why, note that both lines intersect the y-axis at different points, so their equations cannot be of the form x + ay = b for the same values of a and b.

However, both lines intersect the point (-2, 8), so they must satisfy the equations x + 2y = 10 and x − y = 6. These equations can be solved simultaneously to find the unique solution (x, y) = (2, 4).

To learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

In a normal distribution, the mean represents the center of the distribution and the standard deviation represents the spread of the distribution.

The higher the standard deviation, the more spread out the data is. The probability of a specific outcome occurring is given by the area under the curve of the normal distribution that corresponds to that outcome.

For example, if we wanted to find the probability of x being between 45 and 55, we would find the area under the normal curve between those two values. This can be done using a table of standard normal probabilities or by using a calculator or statistical software.

In general, if we know the mean and standard deviation of a normally distributed random variable, we can use that information to find probabilities for specific outcomes or ranges of outcomes.

you'll need to provide a specific range or value of X. Once you have that, you can use the Z-score formula or a standard normal distribution table to determine the probability.

To know more about probability click here

brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

The actual duration of the experiment may vary depending on various factors, such as dropout rates, compliance, and unexpected events.

To determine the number of days needed for the experiment to have a power of 95%, we need to have some additional information about the experiment, such as the sample size, effect size, significance level, and variability in the data.

Assuming that the experiment involves comparing the running time of a group of participants who eat oatmeal with a group of participants who do not eat oatmeal, we can estimate the sample size, effect size, and variability based on previous studies or pilot data.

Let's say that the effect size is 1 minute, the standard deviation of the running time is 5 minutes, and the significance level is 0.05 (i.e., alpha = 0.05). The power of the experiment can be calculated using a power analysis tool, such as G*Power or R.

Using G*Power with a one-tailed t-test, we can calculate the required sample size to achieve a power of 0.95, given the effect size, alpha, and standard deviation. Assuming equal sample sizes in the two groups, we get a required sample size of about 64 participants per group.

Learn more about actual duration

https://brainly.com/question/29493636

#SPJ4

The value of x, for the angle subtended by the arc is derived to be equal to 19.

The angle subtended by an arc of a circle at it's center is twice the angle it substends anywhere on the circles circumference. The arc measure and the angle it subtends at the center of the circle are directly proportional.

so;

262 = 2(6x + 17)

131 = 6x + 17 {divide through by 2}

6x = 131 - 17 {collect like terms}

6x = 114

x = 114/6

x = 19

Therefore, the value of x, for the angle subtended by the arc is derived to be equal to 19.

Read more about angle here:https://brainly.com/question/24423151

#SPJ1

Therefore,  the dimensions that minimize the cost to build the fence around the fencing are 20 m by 10 m.

To minimize the cost of fencing a rectangular field of 200 m2, we need to find the dimensions with the least total cost. Let's use the variables x and y for the length and width of the field, respectively. The area of the field is A = xy = 200 m2.
First, we'll find an equation relating x and y using the area: y = 200/x.
Next, we'll find the cost equation: Cost = 3x + 3x + 8y + 8y = 6x + 16y.
Now, substitute y in the cost equation: Cost = 6x + 16(200/x).
To minimize the cost, we'll find the derivative of the cost function with respect to x and set it equal to zero:
d(Cost)/dx = 6 - 3200/x^2 = 0.
Solving for x, we get x = 20 m. Then, using y = 200/x, we find y = 10 m.
Therefore,  the dimensions that minimize the cost to build the fence around the fencing are 20 m by 10 m.

To learn more about the area of the rectangle visit:

brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ11

The smallest number of seats that must be occupied in order to be certain that at least three people in attendance have the same first and last initials is 677. The answer to this question requires a bit of mathematical reasoning.

If we assume that there are 26 letters in the alphabet (one for each initial), and that each person in attendance has a unique first and last initial, then the maximum number of people that can be in the auditorium without any two people having the same initials is 52 (since there are 26 possible first initials and 26 possible last initials).

However, we are looking for the smallest number of seats that must be occupied in order to guarantee that at least three people have the same initials. To solve this, we can use a formula called the pigeonhole principle, which states that if n items are placed into m containers, and n is greater than m, then there must be at least one container with more than one item.

In this case, the "items" are the people in attendance, and the "containers" are the possible combinations of first and last initials. We know that there are 26 possible first initials and 26 possible last initials, which gives us a total of 26 x 26 = 676 possible combinations.

Using the pigeonhole principle, we can determine that if we have 677 people in the auditorium, there must be at least three people with the same first and last initials. Therefore, the smallest number of seats that must be occupied in order to be certain that at least three people in attendance have the same first and last initials is 677.

Learn more about attendance here:

https://brainly.com/question/28639737

#SPJ11

The maximum value of P is 529, which occurs when x1=0, x2=33/5, x3=24, and the slack variables are all zero.To maximize P=521 + 6x2 + 4x3 subject to the constraints 21 + 222 5x1 + 3x2 + 3x3 21, 22, 23 <6 <24 > 0, we can use the method of linear programming.

First, we need to convert the inequality constraints into equality constraints by introducing slack variables. Let s1, s2, and s3 be the slack variables for the first, second, and third constraints, respectively. Then, the constraints become:

21 + 222 5x1 + 3x2 + 3x3 + s1 = 6
21, 22, 23 + s2 = 6
24 - s3 = 0

Next, we can write the objective function in standard form by introducing a new variable z and writing P as:

P = 521 + 6x2 + 4x3 - z

Now, we can set up the following table for the simplex method:

|   | x1 | x2 | x3 | s1 | s2 | s3 | RHS |
|---|----|----|----|----|----|----|-----|
|   | 0  | 6  | 4  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 521 |
| 1 | 5  | 3  | 3  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 15  |
| 2 | 2  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 6   |
| 3 | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | -1 | 24  |

We start with the initial basic feasible solution where the slack variables are set to their corresponding RHS values and the remaining variables are set to zero.

From the table, we can see that the entering variable is x2 in row 1 since it has the largest coefficient in the objective function. To find the leaving variable, we calculate the ratio of the RHS value to the coefficient of x2 in each row. The smallest positive ratio is in row 3, so x2 leaves the basis and is replaced by x3.

We then perform the necessary row operations to pivot around x2 and obtain the following table:

|   | x1 | x2 | x3 | s1  | s2 | s3 | RHS |
|---|----|----|----|-----|----|----|-----|
|   | 0  | 0  | 10 | -6  | 0  | 1  | 289 |
| 1 | 5  | 3  | 3  | 1   | 0  | 0  | 15  |
| 2 | 2  | 2  | 0  | 0   | 1  | 0  | 6   |
| 3 | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0   | 0  | -1 | 24  |

We can repeat this process by selecting x3 as the entering variable and s3 as the leaving variable, giving us the following table:

|   | x1 | x2 | x3 | s1  | s2 | s3 | RHS |
|---|----|----|----|-----|----|----|-----|
|   | 0  | 0  | 10 | -6  | 0  | 1  | 289 |
| 1 | 5  | 3  | 0  | 1   | -2 | 3  | 33  |
| 2 | 2  | 2  | 0  | 0   | 1  | 0  | 6   |
| 4 | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0   | 0  | -1 | 24  |

Since all coefficients of the objective function are non-negative, we have found the optimal solution. The maximum value of P is 529, which occurs when x1=0, x2=33/5, x3=24, and the slack variables are all zero.

learn more about linear programming here: brainly.com/question/29997614

#SPJ11

Therefore, Compute Cp and Cpk is 0.84 & With Cp and Cpk values less than 1 (0.658 and 0.84), the process isn't capable of consistently producing outputs within the specification limit.

Let's discuss the difference between process capability and statistical control, and then analyze the process you provided.
Process capability (Cp and Cpk) measures the ability of a process to produce outputs within specified limits, whereas statistical control refers to maintaining a process within acceptable variations using control charts.

a. To compute Cp and Cpk, first calculate the process spread and specification spread.
Process spread = 6 * sqrt(variance) = 6 * sqrt(3.61) = 11.4 cm
Specification spread = Upper spec limit - Lower spec limit = (51+3.75) - (51-3.75) = 7.5 cm
Cp = Specification spread / Process spread = 7.5 / 11.4 = 0.658
Cpk = min[(Mean - Lower spec limit) / 3*std_dev, (Upper spec limit - Mean) / 3*std_dev] = min[(50-47.25) / (3*1.9), (54.75-50) / (3*1.9)] = min[1.44, 0.84] = 0.84
b. Conclusion: With Cp and Cpk values less than 1 (0.658 and 0.84), the process isn't capable of consistently producing outputs within the specification limits. It indicates a need for process improvement to meet desired quality standards.

Therefore, Compute Cp and Cpk is 0.84 & With Cp and Cpk values less than 1 (0.658 and 0.84), the process isn't capable of consistently producing outputs within the specification limit.

To know more about statistics visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ11

The correct answer is b. A normal probability distribution is a continuous probability distribution, which means that it can take on any value within a given range.

This type of distribution is often used to model real-world phenomena that are measured on a continuous scale, such as height or weight. Unlike discrete probability distributions, which have a finite number of possible outcomes, a continuous distribution has an infinite number of possible outcomes. It's important to note that while a normal distribution is continuous, not all continuous distributions are normal. A normal distribution has a specific bell-shaped curve that is defined by its mean and standard deviation, and it is often used in statistical analysis to make predictions about the likelihood of certain events occurring within a given population. In summary, a normal probability distribution is a type of continuous probability distribution that is often used to model real-world phenomena. While it has a specific shape and can be described by its mean and standard deviation, it is not always the best model for every situation.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Charcoal drawings found on walls and ceilings in a cave are significant archaeological findings as they provide insights into ancient human culture and art. The age of these drawings can be determined by analyzing the amount of C-14 remaining in a piece of charcoal found in the cave. C-14 is a radioactive isotope that decays at a constant rate over time.

If it was found that 71% of C-14 in a piece of charcoal had decayed through radioactivity, it means that only 29% of the original C-14 remains. Based on the half-life of C-14, which is 5,700 years, we can estimate the age of the charcoal to be approximately 17,100 years old (3 x 5,700 years).

Therefore, the approximate age of the charcoal drawings found in the cave is 17,100 years old. This age provides valuable information about the timeline of human civilization and helps us understand the development of art and culture during that time period. These drawings also offer a glimpse into the lives and beliefs of ancient people who created them, making them important historical artifacts.

Learn more about charcoal drawings here:

https://brainly.com/question/1594477

#SPJ11

By completing squares we will get:

y = (x - 5)^2 - 16

Then the minimum of the quadratic is at y = -16.

Remember the perfect square trinomial:

(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2

Here we have the quadratic:

y = x^2 - 10x + 9

We can rewrite that to get:

y = x^2 - 2*5*x + 9

Add and subtract 5^2 in both sides:

y + 5^2 = x^2 - 2*5*x + 5^2 + 9

Now we can complete squares:

y + 25 = (x - 5)^2 + 9

y = (x - 5)^2 + 9 - 25

y = (x - 5)^2 - 16

Then the vertex is at the point (5, -16), and thus the minimum is y = -16.

Learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex](5, -16)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

1.) [tex]y=x^2[/tex] [tex]-10x+9[/tex]

2.) [tex]y=x^2[/tex] [tex]-10x+25+9-25[/tex]

3.) [tex]y=x^2-10x+25 -16[/tex]

4.) [tex]y=(x-5)^2-16[/tex]

Therefore, the minimum point Is [tex](5, -16)[/tex]

The magnitude of random sampling error in a study depends upon the size of a sample and the amount of variability in the population characteristic being measured.

A larger sample size typically leads to smaller random sampling error because larger samples provide more precise estimates of population parameters.

On the other hand, greater variability in the population characteristic being measured increases random sampling error because it makes it more difficult to accurately estimate the population parameter from a smaller sample.

Therefore, researchers must carefully consider the sample size needed to achieve their desired level of precision in estimating population parameters and take steps to minimize variability in the population characteristic being studied.

for such more question on  sampling error

https://brainly.com/question/28008941

#SPJ11

We can add the remaining terms of the polynomial: f(x) = 8(x+2) + 2(x+2)(x+1) - 4(x+2)(x+1)(x-1) - 1(x+2)(x+1)(x-1)(x-3) + 0.0416667(x+2)(x+1)(x-1)(x-3)(x-4.9). This is the polynomial of lowest degree (4) that passes through the given points.

To use Newton's divided differences to find the polynomial of lowest degree that passes through the given points, we first need to construct a divided difference table. The table will show the differences between the y-values of the given points, and then the differences between those differences, and so on until we have a single value.

Here is the divided difference table:

|-2 -9  |   -1 -1   |  1 -9  |   3 -9  |  4.9
---------------------------------------
|-9     |   8       | -16     |   0     |
|       |-0.5      |  2      |         |
|       | 0.25     |         |         |
|       |-0.125    |         |         |
|       | 0.0416667|         |         |

The first column lists the x-values of the given points, and the second column lists the corresponding y-values. The remaining columns show the divided differences. For example, the entry in row 2, column 2 (-0.5) is the divided difference between the y-values -9 and -1.

Now we can use the divided differences to construct the polynomial of lowest degree that passes through the points. We start with the first divided difference in the second column, which is 8. This gives us the linear term of the polynomial:

f(x) = 8(x+2) + ...

Next, we use the second divided difference in the third column, which is 2. This gives us the quadratic term of the polynomial:

f(x) = 8(x+2) + 2(x+2)(x+1) + ...

Know more about polynomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

Imm Thai is currently the preferred choice among the voters compared to the other Thai restaurants, namely Lucky House, Thai Temple, and Thai Basil.

To ascertain a range of likely values for Imm Thai's true lead over these competitors, we can utilize confidence intervals.

Confidence intervals are a statistical method that helps estimate the range of values within which a population parameter is likely to fall, given a particular level of confidence. In this case, the population parameter is Imm Thai's true lead over the other Thai restaurants combined.

To calculate the confidence interval, we'll need some relevant data from the survey, such as the sample size, mean differences between Imm Thai and its competitors, and the standard deviation of these differences. Then, we'll select an appropriate level of confidence (e.g., 95%) and determine the critical value (often denoted by the letter "z" or "t") corresponding to that level of confidence.

Once we have the necessary data and critical value, we can use the following formula to calculate the confidence interval:

Confidence interval = Mean difference ± (Critical value × Standard error)

The standard error is calculated as the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

By calculating the confidence interval, we can determine a range of likely values for Imm Thai's true lead over Lucky House, Thai Temple, and Thai Basil combined, providing valuable insights into the preferences of the surveyed population.

To learn more about confidence intervals click here

brainly.com/question/29680703

#SPJ11

The maximum radius of the black hole is estimated to be approximately 4.8 billion kilometers.

We can use AGN Brightening Radius Estimate for this purpose.

The timescale over which an AGN brightens significantly can provide us with an estimate of the size of the region responsible for the brightening, which in turn can be used to estimate the maximum radius of the black hole.

One commonly used method to estimate the black hole radius is the "reverberation mapping" technique.

This technique uses the time delay between variations in the brightness of the accretion disk and the resulting variations in the emitted light from the surrounding gas clouds to estimate the distance between the black hole and the clouds.

Assuming that the 8.9 hour brightening period corresponds to a light travel time of twice the radius of the emission region, we can estimate the maximum radius of the black hole as follows:

Convert the brightening period to seconds:

8.9 hours * 3600 seconds/hour = 32040 seconds

Divide the brightening period by 2 to obtain the light travel time:

32040 seconds / 2 = 16020 seconds

Use the light travel time to estimate the distance between the black hole and the surrounding gas clouds:

Distance = speed of light * light travel time = 3 x [tex]10^8[/tex] m/s * 16020 s = 4.806 x [tex]10^{12}[/tex] meters

Convert the distance to kilometers:

4.806 x [tex]10^{12}[/tex] meters = 4.806 x [tex]10^9[/tex] kilometers

Therefore, the maximum radius of the black hole is estimated to be approximately 4.8 billion kilometers (or 32 astronomical units).

Note that this is only an estimate, and the actual radius may be different depending on various factors such as the geometry and orientation of the emission region, as well as the properties of the black hole itself

Learn more about AGN Brightening Radius Estimate.

brainly.com/question/27517737

#SPJ11

Answer:

the awnser is:30° yup it is

Answer:

30°

Step-by-step explanation:

We Know

(4x - 2) + (20x - 10) = 180°

4x - 2 + 20x - 10 = 180

24x - 12 = 180

24x = 192

x = 8

Find m∠EBD

∠ABC is a vertical angle to ∠EBD, meaning they will equal it.

4(8) - 2

32 - 2

30°

So, m∠EBD is 30°

The requreid electricians must rough in a total of 591 outlets for the eight houses.

To find the total number of outlets, we need to add up the number of outlets for each house:

Total outlets = 68 + 87 + 57 + 74 + 49 + 101 + 99 + 56

Total outlets = 591

Therefore, the electricians must rough in a total of 591 outlets for the eight houses.

Learn more about addiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/30169392

#SPJ1

Answer: 41.9

Step-by-step explanation:

A complementary angle is an angle in which when you add another angle measure, you will get 90. For example, 60 + 30 = 90, 30 is a complementary angle, as is 60.

So, for this question in particular, you can set up the equation 48.1 + x = 90. Solve for x by subtracting 90 by 48.1, and the answer will be 41.9.

I never en studied this stuff

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard deviation of a sample proportion is given by the formula:

σ = sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n)

where σ is the standard deviation, p is the sample proportion, and n is the sample size.

If we want the standard deviation to be one-half of what it was for a sample of size 100, we can write the following equation:

(sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / n)) / 2 = sqrt((p * (1 - p)) / 100)

To simplify the equation, we can square both sides:

((p * (1 - p)) / n^2) / 4 = (p * (1 - p)) / 100

Simplifying further:

100 * n^2 = 4 * 1

n^2 = (4 * 1) / 100

n^2 = 0.04

Taking the square root of both sides:

n = sqrt(0.04)

n = 0.2

Therefore, the sample size should be 0.2. However, since the sample size must be a positive integer, we round it up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the sample size should be 1.

To know more about deviation refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31548894#

#SPJ11

In ANOVA, if the observed F equals or exceeds the critical F, the experimental outcome is considered statistically significant.

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is a statistical method used to compare the means of two or more groups. The F-statistic is the test statistic used in ANOVA. When conducting an ANOVA test, we compare the observed F-value to the critical F-value to determine the significance of the results.

Step 1: Calculate the observed F-value using the given data.

Step 2: Determine the critical F-value using the F-distribution table, taking into account the degrees of freedom and the desired significance level (usually set at 0.05).

Step 3: Compare the observed F-value to the critical F-value.

If the observed F-value equals or exceeds the critical F-value, it indicates that there is a statistically significant difference between the group means, and we reject the null hypothesis. In other words, the experimental outcome suggests that at least one of the group means is significantly different from the others.

To know more about statistically  visit:

brainly.com/question/31577270

#SPJ11

There are 28,434 4-permutations of the positive integers not exceeding 100 that contain three consecutive integers in the correct order.

We want to find the number of 4-permutations containing three consecutive integers in the correct order.

Let's break this down step-by-step.

Identify the possible sets of consecutive integers:

Since we are looking for sets of three consecutive integers not exceeding 100, the highest possible set is (98, 99, 100). Therefore, we have a total of 98 sets (from 1-2-3 to 98-99-100).
Determine the number of ways to arrange each set within a 4-permutation:

Each set of consecutive integers can appear at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end of the permutation. So, there are 3 different positions for each set.

Calculate the remaining integer's options:

For each of the 3 positions, we have 97 options for the remaining integer since it must be different from the three consecutive integers in the set.

Multiply the number of sets, positions, and remaining integer options: 98 sets * 3 positions * 97 remaining integer options = 28,434 possible 4-permutations.

For similar question on permutations.

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

The correct option is A, the solution is (6, 25) and the equations are:

y = (-5/2)x + 40

y = (5/3)x + 15

To find the solution of the system of equations we need to identify the point where the two graphs intercept.

Here we can see a graph where we have two lines, these lines intercept at the point (6, 25), so that is the solution of the system of linear equations.

Now, notice that the equation with negative slope has an y-intercept of 40.

The line with positive slope has an y-intercept at 15.

Then the correct option is A.

Learn more about system of equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1

The probability that the third digit is odd given that the first two digits are odd is 8/45.

To solve this problem, we first need to find the total number of possible combinations. Since the locker combination has three nonzero digits with no repetition, we can choose the first digit in 9 ways (since it cannot be zero), the second digit in 4 ways (since it must be odd and cannot be the same as the first digit), and the third digit in 5 ways (since it can be any odd digit except for the two already chosen). Therefore, the total number of possible combinations is 9 x 4 x 5 = 180.

Next, we need to find the number of combinations where the first two digits are odd and the third digit is also odd. We have already determined that there are 4 choices for the second digit. Since the first digit must also be odd, there are 4 odd choices for the first digit. Once the first two digits have been chosen, there are only 2 odd choices left for the third digit (since one odd digit has already been used). Therefore, there are 4 x 4 x 2 = 32 combinations where the first two digits are odd and the third digit is also odd.

Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes (32) by the total number of possible outcomes (180):

P(third digit is odd | first two digits are odd) = 32/180 = 8/45

Therefore, the probability that the third digit is odd given that the first two digits are odd is 8/45.

to learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ11

The population of the country will be twice what it was in 1980 approximately 67.8 years after 1980, which would be around 2047.

To find out when the population will be twice what it was in 1980, we need to set up an equation and solve for t.

Let's first determine the population in 1980:

N(0) = 217e0.0102(0) = 217

So, the population in 1980 was 217 million.

Now, we want to find out when the population will be twice that amount:

2(217) = 434

We can set up an equation:

434 = 217e0.0102t

Divide both sides by 217:

2 = e0.0102t

Take the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(2) = 0.0102t

Solve for t:

t = ln(2)/0.0102

t ≈ 67.8

Therefore, the population of the country will be twice what it was in 1980 approximately 67.8 years after 1980, which would be around 2047.

Learn more about population here:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860?

#SPJ11

The probability that the lifespan of a set of tires will be between 32,000 and 44,000 miles is approximately 0.99994 or 99.994%.

To solve this problem, we'll use the concepts of normal distribution, z-scores, and the z-table.

Calculate the z-scores for the given mileage values.
To calculate the z-score, use the formula: z = (X - μ) / σ
For 32,000 miles:
z1 = (32,000 - 38,000) / 1,500 = -6,000 / 1,500 = -4
For 44,000 miles:
z2 = (44,000 - 38,000) / 1,500 = 6,000 / 1,500 = 4
Look up the z-scores in the z-table and find the corresponding probabilities.
For z1 = -4, the z-table gives a probability of approximately 0.00003 (essentially 0).
For z2 = 4, the z-table gives a probability of approximately 0.99997.

Calculate the probability of the lifespan being between 32,000 and 44,000 miles.
Subtract the probability of z1 from the probability of z2:
P(32,000 < X < 44,000) = P(z2) - P(z1) = 0.99997 - 0.00003 = 0.99994.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/12911628

#SPJ11