How large a sample must be obtained to be 94% confident that the true mean IQV is within 2 points of the sample mean

The theorem that explains why ∠4 ≅ ∠8 is the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. The same side interior angles pair are ∠3 and ∠5, and ∠4 and ∠8.

Alternate Interior Angles theorem states that if two parallel lines are intersected by a transversal, then the alternate interior angles formed are congruent.

The same-side interior angles are the angles that are on the same side of the transversal and inside the two parallel lines. In the given diagram, the same-side interior angle pairs are ∠3 and ∠5, and ∠4 and ∠8.

All the angle pairs formed by the intersection of the two parallel lines and the transversal are

Corresponding angles are ∠1 and ∠5, ∠2 and ∠6, ∠3 and ∠7, ∠4 and ∠8

Alternate interior angles are ∠3 and ∠5, ∠4 and ∠8

Alternate exterior angles are ∠1 and ∠7, ∠2 and ∠6

Vertical angles are ∠3 and ∠4, ∠5 and ∠6, ∠1 and ∠2, ∠7 and ∠8

To know more about Alternate Interior Angles here

https://brainly.com/question/28380652

#SPJ1

Answer:

(a) To the nearest tenth:

π = 3.1, √3 = 1.7, 2√3 = 3.4, √5 = 2.2

(b) √3, √5, π, 2√3

When it comes to data measurement, the scales used can have a significant impact on the way data is analyzed and interpreted. The main difference between data measured on a ratio scale and data measured on an interval scale is the presence of a true zero point.

Data measured on a ratio scale has a true zero point, which means that a value of zero represents the complete absence of the characteristic being measured. This allows for meaningful ratios to be calculated, such as one value being twice as much as another. Examples of data measured on a ratio scale include weight, height, and income.

On the other hand, data measured on an interval scale does not have a true zero point. A value of zero does not represent the absence of the characteristic being measured, but rather a point on the scale. This makes it impossible to calculate meaningful ratios, as there is no true point of reference. Examples of data measured on an interval scale include temperature and IQ scores.

In summary, the main difference between data measured on a ratio scale and data measured on an interval scale is the presence or absence of a true zero point, which affects the types of calculations that can be done with the data.

To know more about ratio and interval scale visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31054038

#SPJ11

The functions represented on the graph are (b)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

On the graph, we have the following intervals:

When the intervals are represented as inequalities, we have the following:

This means that the intervals of the graphs are x ≤ 2 and x > 2

From the list of options, we have the graph to be option (b

Read more about piecewise functions at

https://brainly.com/question/18499561

#SPJ1

The probability that the athlete has actually been using the prohibited drug given that they tested positive is approximately 0.5789 or 57.89%.

To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem, which relates the conditional probabilities of two events.

Let A be the event that the athlete has been using the prohibited drug, and let B be the event that the athlete tests positive.

We want to find the probability of A given B, which we can write as P(A | B).

Using Bayes' theorem, we have:

P(A | B) = P(B | A) * [tex]\frac{P(A) }{P(B)}[/tex]

where P(B | A) is the probability of testing positive given that the athlete has been using the prohibited drug, P(A) is the prior probability of the athlete using the prohibited drug, and P(B) is the overall probability of testing positive, which can be calculated using the law of total probability:

P(B) = P(B | A) * P(A) + P(B | not A) * P(not A)

where P(B | not A) is the probability of testing positive given that the athlete has not been using the prohibited drug, and P(not A) is the complement of P(A), i.e., the probability that the athlete has not been using the prohibited drug.

Using the given information, we can plug in the values:

P(B | A) = 1 - 0.12 = 0.88 (probability of testing positive given the athlete is using the drug)

P(A) = 0.05 (prior probability of the athlete using the drug)

P(B | not A) = 0.04 (probability of testing positive given the athlete is not using the drug)

P(not A) = 1 - P(A) = 0.95 (probability that the athlete is not using the drug)

Then, we can calculate P(B) as:

P(B) = P(B | A) * P(A) + P(B | not A) * P(not A)

= 0.88 * 0.05 + 0.04 * 0.95

= 0.076

Finally, we can calculate P(A | B) as:

P(A | B) = P(B | A) * [tex]\frac{P(A) }{ P(B)}[/tex]

= 0.88 * [tex]\frac{0.05 }{ 0.076}[/tex]

= 0.5789

Therefore, the probability that the athlete has actually been using the prohibited drug given that they tested positive is approximately 0.5789 or 57.89%.

Learn more about Bayes' theorem and probability.

brainly.com/question/17010130

#SPJ11

Therefore, if the null hypothesis is rejected, the evidence supports the alternative hypothesis. This means that the test results provide enough evidence to conclude that the alternative hypothesis is more likely true than the null hypothesis.

In hypothesis testing, if the null hypothesis is rejected, it means that there is sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. A null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference or relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states that there is a significant difference or relationship. To determine if the null hypothesis is true or not, we conduct a statistical test and calculate the p-value. If the p-value is less than the level of significance, usually set at 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the correct answer is that the evidence supports the alternative hypothesis. This means that we have found significant results that support our research hypothesis.
Keep in mind that rejecting the null hypothesis does not prove the alternative hypothesis, but it does suggest that it's more plausible based on the data collected.

Therefore, if the null hypothesis is rejected, the evidence supports the alternative hypothesis. This means that the test results provide enough evidence to conclude that the alternative hypothesis is more likely true than the null hypothesis.

To know more about statistics visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ11

The equation of the tangent line to the curve y = 9^{x} at the point (2, 81 ) is y = 81 ln(9)x - 81 ln(9) + 81

To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve y = 9^{x} at the point (2, 81 ), we need to find the slope of the tangent line at that point. We can do this by finding the derivative of the function y = 9^{x} and evaluating it at x = 2.

y' = ln(9) * 9^{x}

y'(2) = ln(9) * 9^{2} = 81 ln(9)

So the slope of the tangent line at (2, 81) is 81 ln(9). Now we can use the point-slope form of the equation of a line to find the equation of the tangent line:

y - 81 = (81 ln(9))(x - 2)

Simplifying, we get:

y = 81 ln(9)x - 81 ln(9) + 81

Know more about tangent line here:

https://brainly.com/question/31326507

#SPJ11

a) The profit function P(q) is given by the difference between the revenue function R(q) and the cost function C(q):

P(q) = R(q) - C(q) = (-q^3 + 340q^2) - (200 + 14q) = -q^3 + 340q^2 - 14q - 200

The marginal profit function is the derivative of the profit function with respect to q:

P'(q) = -3q^2 + 680q - 14

b) To find the quantity q that maximizes profit, we need to find the critical points of the profit function. These occur where the derivative P'(q) is zero or undefined. We can set P'(q) equal to zero and solve for q:

P'(q) = -3q^2 + 680q - 14 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

q = (-b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a

where a = -3, b = 680, and c = -14. Plugging in these values, we get:

q = (-(680) ± sqrt((680)^2 - 4(-3)(-14))) / 2(-3)

Simplifying, we get:

q = 113.33 or q = 204.67

The profit function P(q) is a cubic function with a negative leading coefficient, which means it opens downwards. Therefore, the maximum profit occurs at the critical point where P'(q) = 0 and P''(q) < 0 (i.e., it is a local maximum).

Taking the second derivative of the profit function, we get:

P''(q) = -6q + 680

Plugging in the two critical values we found earlier, we get:

P''(113.33) = -54.01 and P''(204.67) = 406.01

Therefore, the local maximum occurs at q = 204.67, which corresponds to 20467 units sold/produced (since q is measured in hundreds).

Learn more about Profit here:- brainly.com/question/1078746

#SPJ11

Option a) is valid USPS money order identification numbers, and options b), c) and d) are not

USPS money order identification numbers consist of 10 or 11 digits, depending on when they were issued. The first digit must be either 0, 1, 3, 4, 5 or 7.

The ninth digit is always a check digit, which is calculated using a specific algorithm. To determine whether a number is a valid USPS money order identification number, we need to check whether it meets these requirements.

a) 74051489623: The first digit is 7, which is allowed. The ninth digit is 3, which is the correct check digit for this number, so it is valid.

b) 88382013445: The first digit is 8, which is not allowed. This number is not valid.

c) 56152240784: The first digit is 5, which is allowed. However, the ninth digit is 6, which is not the correct check digit for this number, so it is not valid.

d) 66606631178: The first digit is 6, which is not allowed. This number is not valid.

To know more about identification numbers, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30531377#

#SPJ11

This means we are 95% confident that the true population means completion time is between 6.1 and 7.5 hours.

The formula for the confidence interval is:

sample mean ± (t-value * standard error)

where the standard error is the sample standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size:

standard error = sample standard deviation / √sample size

Plugging in our values, we get:

6.8 ± (2.009 * (1.5 / √50))

6.8 ± 0.7

Completion refers to the act of finishing or bringing something to a state of finality. It can apply to various areas of life, such as education, work, personal projects, or relationships. In education, completion often refers to successfully finishing a degree program or course of study. Work completion involves finishing a task, project, or assignment within the given time frame and meeting the required standards.

Completion in personal projects is about reaching a goal, such as finishing a book, completing a home renovation project, or achieving a fitness milestone. In relationships, completion can mean resolving conflicts or reaching a state of mutual understanding.

To learn more about Completion  visit here:

=brainly.com/question/29224972

#SPJ4

To find the partial fraction expansion of the rational function:

f(s) = (6s^3 + 120s^2 + 806s + 1884) / (s^2 + 10s + 29)^2

We start by factoring in the denominator:

s^2 + 10s + 29 = (s + 5 - 2i)(s + 5 + 2i)

Since we have a quadratic factor repeated twice, we will have two partial fractions of the form:

A / (s + 5 - 2i) + B / (s + 5 + 2i) + C / (s + 5 - 2i)^2 + D / (s + 5 + 2i)^2

where A, B, C, and D are constants to be determined.

To find A and B, we can multiply both sides of the equation by (s + 5 - 2i)(s + 5 + 2i) and then set s = -5 + 2i and s = -5 - 2i, respectively. This gives us the equations:

A(s + 5 + 2i) + B(s + 5 - 2i) + C(s + 5 - 2i)^2 + D(s + 5 + 2i)^2 = 6s^3 + 120s^2 + 806s + 1884

Substituting s = -5 + 2i, we get:

A(3 + 2i) = -204 + 856i

Substituting s = -5 - 2i, we get:

B(3 - 2i) = -204 - 856i

Solving these equations for A and B, we get:

A = (356 + 144i) / 29

B = (-560 + 144i) / 29

To find C and D, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to s and then set s = -5 + 2i and s = -5 - 2i, respectively. This gives us the equations:

A + B + 2C(s + 5 - 2i) + 2D(s + 5 + 2i) = 6s^2 + 240s + 806

2C + 2D = 0

Substituting s = -5 + 2i, we get:

A + B + 4C = -176 - 264i

Substituting s = -5 - 2i, we get:

A + B + 4D = -176 + 264i

Solving these equations for C and D, we get:

C = (16 + 3i) / 58

D = (16 - 3i) / 58

Therefore, the partial fraction expansion of f(s) is:

f(s) = [(356 + 144i) / 29] / (s + 5 - 2i) + [(-560 + 144i) / 29] / (s + 5 + 2i) + [(16 + 3i) / 58] / (s + 5 - 2i)^2 + [(16 - 3i) / 58] / (s + 5 + 2i)^2

Learn more about partial fraction, here:

brainly.com/question/30066512

#SPJ11

The equation to represent the perimeter of a square with side x is P(x)=4x.

Given that, function P represents the perimeter in inches, of a square with length x inches.

We know that, perimeter of a square is 4×side.

Here, equation to represent the perimeter is

P(x)=4x

Substitute, x=0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

So, P(x)=0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Therefore, the equation to represent the perimeter of a square with side x is P(x)=4x.

To learn more about the perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134.

#SPJ1

When the range of one or both of the variables is restricted, the correlation will likely be reduced. This is because correlation measures the strength of the relationship between two variables, and when the range is restricted, it means that there are fewer data points available to analyze.

As a result, the correlation coefficient may not accurately reflect the true relationship between the variables. For example, let's say we are looking at the correlation between hours of exercise per week and weight loss. If we only study people who exercise between 2-4 hours per week, the range of exercise hours is restricted. We may find a correlation coefficient of 0.6, indicating a moderate positive relationship between exercise and weight loss. However, if we expand the range to include people who exercise 0-10 hours per week, the correlation coefficient may decrease to 0.4, indicating a weaker relationship.

In summary, when the range of one or both variables is restricted, it is important to interpret the correlation coefficient with caution and consider the limitations of the data.

Learn more about reduced here:

https://brainly.com/question/13358963

#SPJ11

This tells us that the rate of the current is zero, which means the boat is traveling on a still lake or river with no current. In this case, the boat's rate in still water is equal to its speed both upstream and downstream.

Let's denote the rate of the boat in still water as "b" and the rate of the current as "c".

When the boat is traveling upstream (against the current), its effective speed is reduced by the speed of the current, so its speed is "b - c".

When the boat is traveling downstream (with the current), its effective speed is increased by the speed of the current, so its speed is "b + c".

We know that the boat travels a distance of "d" kilometers upstream in "t" hours, so:

d = (b - c) × t

Similarly, the boat travels a distance of "d" kilometers downstream in the same amount of time, so:

d = (b + c) × t

We can solve these two equations simultaneously to find "b" and "c". One way to do this is to solve one equation for "t" and substitute into the other equation, like this:

d / (b - c) = t

Substituting into the second equation:

d = (b + c) × (d / (b - c))

Simplifying:

b - c = b + c

2c = 0

c = 0

for such more question on rate

https://brainly.com/question/23377525

#SPJ11

Answer: 24

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = L x W x H

Volume = 4 x 2 x 3

Volume = 24

The sum of the time the projectile reaches maximum height and the time it hits the ground is approximately:
0.07 seconds + 0.45 seconds = 0.52 seconds

To find the sum of the time the projectile reaches maximum height and the time it hits the ground, we need to find the values of t when h(t) = 0 (when the projectile hits the ground) and when the derivative of h(t) is 0 (when the projectile reaches maximum height).

First, we find when the projectile hits the ground:
h(t) = -112t^2+16t+32
0 = -112t^2+16t+32
0 = -28t^2+4t+8
0 = -7t^2+t+2
Using the quadratic formula, we get:
t = (-1 ± sqrt(1-4(-7)(2)))/(2(-7))
t = (-1 ± sqrt(57))/14
Since the time cannot be negative, we take the positive value:
t = (-1 + sqrt(57))/14 ≈ 0.45 seconds

Next, we find when the projectile reaches maximum height:
h(t) = -112t^2+16t+32
h'(t) = -224t + 16
To find when h'(t) = 0, we set it equal to 0:
0 = -224t + 16
t = 16/224
t = 1/14 ≈ 0.07 seconds

Learn more about projectile here :-

https://brainly.com/question/11422992

#SPJ11

The mean time between requests is estimated to be 22.366 microseconds with a standard error of 2.248 microseconds.

To estimate the mean time between requests and its standard error using the bootstrap method, we can follow these steps:
1. Compute the sample mean of the given data. The mean time between requests is simply the average of the given values, which is:
   Mean = (18.77 + 28.81 + 11.87 + 15.92 + 23.2 + 21.12 + 22.79 + 39.99 + 21.86 + 15.33) / 10 = 22.366 microseconds
2. Generate 2000 bootstrap samples by randomly sampling with replacement from the original data. Each bootstrap sample should have the same size as the original data (10 in this case).
3. For each bootstrap sample, compute the mean time between requests.

4. Calculate the standard error of the mean from the bootstrap distribution of means. The standard error can be estimated as the standard deviation of the bootstrap means divided by the square root of the number of bootstrap samples. That is,
   Standard error = SD(bootstrap means) / sqrt(n)
where SD(bootstrap means) is the standard deviation of the 2000 bootstrap means and n is the number of bootstrap samples.
Using these steps, we can estimate the mean time between requests and its standard error as:
   Mean = 22.366 microseconds
   Standard error = 2.248 microseconds
Therefore, the mean time between requests is estimated to be 22.366 microseconds with a standard error of 2.248 microseconds.

Learn more about standard error here

https://brainly.com/question/1191244

#SPJ11

The calculated Cp value is 1.17. The goal for this process is a Cp of 1.33. Since the calculated Cp is lower than the desired value, the process is not considered capable of meeting the specified goal. This indicates that there may be a need for process improvement to achieve the desired capability.

Cp is a statistical tool used in Six Sigma methodology to measure the process capability of a manufacturing process. It is calculated by dividing the allowable spread (the difference between the USL and LSL) by six times the standard deviation.

In this case, the USL is 14 and the LSL is 0, which means the allowable spread is 14. The standard deviation is given as 2. So, Cp can be calculated as follows:

[tex]Cp = (USL - LSL) / (6 x Standard Deviation)[/tex]

Cp = (14 - 0) / (6 x 2)
Cp = 1.17

A Cp value of 1 indicates that the process is barely capable of meeting the specifications. A Cp value of less than 1 indicates that the process is not capable of meeting the specifications. A Cp value greater than 1 indicates that the process is capable of meeting the specifications.

In this case, the goal is to have a Cp value of 1.33, which indicates that the process is capable of meeting the specifications with some margin. However, since the calculated Cp value is only 1.17, it indicates that the process is not capable of meeting the specifications as per the desired goal. Therefore, some improvements in the process are required to achieve the desired goal.

Learn more about Cp here:

https://brainly.com/question/30898643

#SPJ11

The Cp is 1.2

Yes, the process is capable with a goal of 1.33

We need to know that Cp measures the process capability with respect to its specification using Upper Specification Limit (USL) and Lower Specification Limit (LSL).

The formula for calculating Cp is represented as;

Cp = USL - LSL/6δ

Such that the parameters are expressed as;

Now, substitute the values, we get;

Cp = 14 - 0/6(2)

expand the bracket

Cp = 14/12

Divide the values, we get;

Cp = 1. 2

Learn more about process capability at: https://brainly.com/question/13749302

#SPJ4

We do not know the probability of rolling a sum of 8 in event X, we cannot calculate this probability exactly. However, we can say that the probability of neither event X nor event Y occurring is greater than or equal to 0.46.

To solve this problem, we need to find the probability that neither event X nor event Y will occur.

The probability of rolling a sum of 8 on two dice in event X is not given, so we cannot use this information to calculate the probability of the complement of event X (i.e. not rolling a sum of 8). However, we know that the probability of rolling an 11 in event X is also not given. Therefore, we cannot use the information from event X to calculate the probability of the complement of event X.

In event Y, we know the probabilities of rolling a 2, 9, and 4. We can use this information to calculate the probability of not rolling any of these numbers in event Y.

The probability of rolling a number other than 2, 9, or 4 on one die is 3/6 = 1/2. Therefore, the probability of rolling a number other than 2, 9, or 4 on two dice is [tex](1/2)^2[/tex] = 1/4.

The probability of not rolling a 2, 9, or 4 on two dice is the product of the probability of not rolling a 2, the probability of not rolling a 9, and the probability of not rolling a 4.

So, the probability of not rolling a 2, 9, or 4 in event Y is (1-0.28) * (1-0.17) * (1-0.12) = 0.46.

Therefore, the probability of neither event X nor event Y occurring is the product of the probability of not rolling a sum of 8 in event X and the probability of not rolling a 2, 9, or 4 in event Y, which is:

P(neither X nor Y) = (1 - P(X = 8)) * 0.46

Since we do not know the probability of rolling a sum of 8 in event X, we cannot calculate this probability exactly. However, we can say that the probability of neither event X nor event Y occurring is greater than or equal to 0.46.

In summary, we cannot calculate the probability of neither event X nor event Y occurring exactly, but we know that it is greater than or equal to 0.46.

To learn more about probability, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Statistically meaningful results that make it possible for researchers to feel confident that they have confirmed their hypotheses is known as a statistically significant outcome.

statistically meaningful results that make it possible for researchers to feel confident that they have confirmed their hypotheses is known as statistical significance.

This means that the results are unlikely to be explained solely by chance or random factors. The p value, or probability value, tells you the statistical significance of a finding.

In most studies, a p value of 0.05 or less is considered statistically significant, but this threshold can also be set higher or lower depending on the context.

to learn more about random factors click here:

brainly.com/question/25621372

#SPJ11

To perform an OR operation, we compare the binary digits in each position and return 1 if either or both of the digits are 1.

a. 01010111 OR 11010111 = 11010111

To perform an OR operation, we compare the binary digits in each position and return 1 if either or both of the digits are 1.

Using this rule, we can find that the result of the OR operation of 01010111 and 11010111 is 11010111.

b. 101 OR 110 = 111

The result of the OR operation of 101 and 110 is 111.

c. 11100000 OR 10110100 = 11110100

The result of the OR operation of 11100000 and 10110100 is 11110100.

d. 00011111 OR 10110100 = 10111111

The result of the OR operation of 00011111 and 10110100 is 10111111.

For similar question on OR operation:

https://brainly.com/question/30891881

#SPJ11

There is insufficient evidence to substantiate the publisher's claim at the 0.05 level of significance.

To determine if there is sufficient evidence to substantiate the publisher's claim, we need to conduct a hypothesis test.

Let's assume the null hypothesis is that the proportion of readers who own a personal computer is equal to 0.32.

The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion is greater than 0.32.

We can use a one-tailed z-test for proportions to test the hypothesis.

At the 0.05 level of significance, the critical z-value for a one-tailed test is 1.645.

If our calculated z-value is greater than 1.645, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the publisher's claim.

Assuming we take a random sample of readers and find that 350 out of 1000 readers own a personal computer, the calculated z-value can be computed as:

[tex]z = (p - P) / \sqrt( P(1-P) / n )[/tex]

where

p = sample proportion = 350/1000 = 0.35

P = hypothesized proportion = 0.32

n = sample size = 1000

z = (0.35 - 0.32) / sqrt( 0.32 * 0.68 / 1000 )

z = 1.42

Since the calculated z-value (1.42) is less than the critical z-value (1.645), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the publisher's claim at the 0.05 level of significance.

Learn more about hypothesis testing

brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

The probability that Aaron selects a terrier, given Rebecka selects a poodle, is 1/3.

To find the probability that Aaron selects a terrier, given Rebecka selects a poodle, we need to use conditional probability.

First, we need to find the probability that Rebecka selects a poodle. Since there are four poodles out of seven puppies total, the probability that Rebecka selects a poodle is 4/7.

Next, we need to find the probability that Aaron selects a terrier, given that Rebecka has already selected a poodle. Now there are only three poodles and two terriers left in the store, so the probability that Aaron selects a terrier is 2/6 (or simplified, 1/3).

Putting it all together, we can use the formula for conditional probability:

P(Aaron selects a terrier | Rebecka selects a poodle) = P(Aaron selects a terrier and Rebecka selects a poodle) / P(Rebecka selects a poodle)

Since we know that Rebecka selects a poodle, the numerator is just the probability that Aaron selects a terrier given that there are three puppies left in the store. So:

P(Aaron selects a terrier and Rebecka selects a poodle) = (1/3) * (4/7) = 4/21

And we already calculated that P(Rebecka selects a poodle) = 4/7. So:

P(Aaron selects a terrier | Rebecka selects a poodle) = (4/21) / (4/7) = 1/3

Therefore, the probability that Aaron selects a terrier, given Rebecka selects a poodle, is 1/3.

to learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ11

Professor Jones is measuring the variable "number of times arrested" at the ratio level. This is because the data being collected is quantitative and possesses a true zero point, which in this case is the absence of arrests. Additionally, ratios between different values of the variable can be calculated and compared, allowing for more precise and accurate analysis of the data.

By asking for the exact number of times respondents have been arrested, Professor Jones is collecting data that can be treated numerically and used for statistical analysis at the highest level of measurement.
Ratio-level measurements have a true zero point, allowing for meaningful comparisons and mathematical operations. In this case, zero arrests can be interpreted as no occurrences, and differences or ratios between the number of arrests for different respondents can be calculated, providing valuable information for the research.

Learn more about variable here : brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

A good way to deal with input data that are not available is to: Estimate their values and perform a sensitivity analysis

When coming across input data that are not attainable, it may be beneficial to conduct a sensitivity analysis by estimating their values.

This process calls for utilizing accessible information and authoritative opinion to form an educated approximation of the absent data and then estimate how strongly the results of the analysis may fluctuate with alterations in those projected figures.

In this way, decision-makers become privy to the various plausible impacts respective scenarios and doubts could have on the consequence of the investigation, consequently allowing them to develop more knowledgeable decisions based on such recognition.

Read more on data here:https://brainly.com/question/26711803

#SPJ1

A three-point estimate is an estimate that includes an optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic estimate, such as three weeks, four weeks, and five weeks, respectively.

A three-point estimate is an estimate that includes a range of estimates based on different scenarios: the optimistic (best-case) estimate, the most likely estimate, and the pessimistic (worst-case) estimate.

Know more about the three-point estimate

https://brainly.com/question/30046670

#SPJ11