Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark Supreme Court case that ruled that the 5th amendment restricts prosecutors from using a person's statements in response to interrogation while in police custody. "The defendant not only understood these rights but voluntarily waived them."
Miranda v. Arizona protects me from statements that can be uttered while in police custody. Statements that are said out of nervousness or taken out of context cannot be used to jeopardize a position in a court of law. Furthermore, the presumption of innocence is an important component in our society of rule of law.
Explanation:
Which of the following are likely provisions of the Identity Theft and Assumption
Deterrence Act of 1998? Select all that apply.
knowingly transferring a false identity document to another person with the knowledge that the
document was stolen
possessing a United States identity document such as a passport, knowing the document has been
stolen or falsely produced
knowingly producing a false identity document
knowingly using the Internet to collect information about another individual
Answer:
knowingly producing a false-identity document;
knowingly transferring a false-identity document to another person with the knowledge that the document was stolen;
possessing a United States identity document such as a passport, knowing the document has been stolen or falsely produced.
Explanation:
Edge Explanation: About 7 percent of U.S. residents over the age of sixteen were victims of some form of identity theft in 2012; 85 percent of these cases involved the illegal use of financial and credit information. Over half of those victims of identity theft who were able to resolve their problem did so in a day or two, while 29 percent had to spend a month resolving the issues with their credit record and bank financial information.
is the us treasury responsible for implementing banking laws passed by congress
Answer:The 1913 Federal Reserve Act is U.S. legislation that created the current Federal Reserve System.1 Congress developed the Federal Reserve Act to establish economic stability in the ... It was implemented to establish economic stability in the U.S. by introducing a Central Bank to oversee monetary policy.
Explanation:
Obama's executive order on the accessibility of private handguns relates
directly to this case *
O Marbury v. Madison
D. C. V. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
O U.S. vs. Nixon
Answer: It relates to the D.C. v. Heller case.
Explanation: This case has to do with the second amendment that allows an individual to bear arms.
Unexpected expenses...
A. can make it hard to stick to your budget.
B. may cause you to be unable to pay necessary bills.
C. should be planned for.
D. all of the above
Unexpected expenses can make it difficult to stick to a budget, may cause difficulty in paying necessary bills, and should ideally be planned for by setting aside an emergency fund. Therefore, option D is correct.
What are the Unexpected expenses?Unexpected expenses are costs that arise unexpectedly or are not part of one's regular budget. These expenses can vary in size and impact, from minor inconveniences to major financial setbacks. Examples of unexpected expenses may include medical emergencies, car repairs, home repairs, job loss, natural disasters, and other unforeseen events.
Unexpected expenses can be particularly challenging for those who have a limited income or are living paycheck to paycheck. In such cases, unexpected expenses may result in financial hardship and may require individuals to take out loans or go into debt to cover the costs.
To prepare for unexpected expenses, it is important to have an emergency fund that can be used to cover unexpected costs without having to rely on loans or credit cards. Planning ahead and setting aside money for unforeseen events can help to reduce the financial impact of unexpected expenses.
Learn more about Unexpected expenses here:
https://brainly.com/question/15325156
#SPJ2
Which of the following was a former name for the FBI?
The Division of Investigation
The United States Bureau of Investigation
the US Secret Service
The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
Answer:
B The United States Bureau of Investigation
Explanation:
Answer:
all of them
A. the US Secret Service
B. The United States Bureau of Investigation
C. The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
D. The Division of Investigation
Explanation:
List the different courts in your state (Texas is my state)
Answer:
mines texas tooo hayyyyyyy!!!!
Explanation:
All of the following situations may result in a strict liability tort EXCEPT: Select one: a. A car driven by someone speeding excessively causes an accident. b. A neighbor's pet tiger escapes and mauls your child. c. A truck carrying nuclear waste crashes when the driver falls asleep. d. A car with a faulty accelerator causes an accident.
Answer: A. a car driven by someone speeding excessively causes an accident.
Explanation:
Strict liability is simply referred to as a liability that is without fault. According to strict liability, someone can be liable to commit a crime even though such person didn't intentionally cause the harm or wasn't in his or her good state of mind.
From the information given in the question, the situations that may result in a strict liability include a neighbor's pet tiger that escapes and mauls a child, a truck carrying nuclear waste that crashes when the driver falls asleep and a faulty car that causes an accident.
Can a 16-year-old convicted of murder receive the death penalty
Answer: no why?
Explanation:
Answer:
yes.
Explanation:
Children can face death as punishment for their crimes. Girls as young as nine can be sentenced to death, but boys have to be at least 15 years old. There were reports made in 2014 that 14 people were executed in Iran for crimes they allegedly committed when they were under the age of 18.
Question 6 of 10
A judge may be asked to decide that a Complaint has no legal remedy under
the law by submitting a
A. Motion for Nuisance Suits
B. Motion to Suppress the Complaint
C. Motion for Summary Judgment
D. Motion to Dismiss
SUBMIT
Answer:
D. motion to dismiss
Explanation:
What do all law enforcement agencies need in order to be prepared for a case involving forensic entomology
Answer:
An Entomological Evidence Collection Kit.
Explanation:
Entomology can be defined as the scientific study of insects such as arthropods i.e living organisms having exoskeletons, a pair of antenna and compound eyes, three (3) body segments and six (6) legs.
Forensic entomology can be defined as the scientific study of the invasion of insects, as well as their arthropods counterparts on post-mortem bodies or decomposed cadavers in legal matters such as during legal investigation.
This ultimately implies that, forensic entomology deals with the scientific study of insects in order to help in establishing the true position of a dead victim of a crime before the actions and transport of the decomposed cadaver by insects. Also, this field of science can be used to establish a relationship between the suspect and the dead victim of a crime.
Hence, all law enforcement agencies need an Entomological Evidence Collection Kit in order to be prepared for a case involving forensic entomology because the insects and their arthropods counterparts or relatives when collected are kept safely in the kit for further investigation.
Interpreting Political Cartoons 1. Describe what is happening in the cartoon. 2. Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany. Does that fact explain why the cartoon blames Hitler personally for the treatment of German minorities? Explain. 3. Why might a minority group in the situation shown by the cartoon go along with a dicta- tor's demand? 4. Drawing Conclusions Why do you think Hitler wanted German minorities to tell the world they were doing well?
Incomplete question. Attached is the missing image.
Explanation:
1. The shows a weak prisoner forced to make a statement against his will, he is been forced to say what the man (representing the dictator, Hitler) behind him tells him to say.
2. Many people conclude that the fact Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany makes him personally responsible for the way in which German minorities were treated.
3. Because failing to do so as is often the case would result in their own death, just as the cartoon shows a gun pointed at the head of the prisoner.
4. So he appears to be their messiah or savior.
Jack sees Jill falling down a hill. At the bottom of the hill, Jill is tumbled over, and clearly endured serious injury. However, while it is not the most ethical conduct, Jack is in a rush and does not feel like helping Jill. Jill attempts to sue Jack for negligence. Which element of negligence will Jill most likely be unable to prove?
a. Duty - under the bystander rule, Jack is under no legal obligation to help ill.
b. Breach. Jack had a duty to help jill that he failed to meet by not coming to her rescue.
c. Causation because Jack did not help Jul, she was hurt.
d. Harm - Jill suffered harm as a result of Jack's negligence
Answer:
The element of negligence will Jill most likely be unable to prove is:
b. Breach. Jack had a duty to help Jill that he failed to meet by not coming to her rescue.
Explanation:
According to the bystander rule, a person does not have the legal duty to rescue or assist another person who is at risk or in danger, even if society imposes a moral obligation for the bystander to provide assistance. While the law does not require one to jeopardize his own life, to give aid to someone else, the Good Samaritan law imposes some legal duty on the bystander to act in some situations. However, Jill cannot prove that Jack breached a duty to help her.
To claim the case in court four elements of negligence are required. The element that will not be proved by Jill is the breach as it was not a legal duty of Jack.
What is the element of a breach?The element of negligence includes causation, duty, harm, and breach. According to the witness rule, it is not illegal or law-abiding for an observer to help other people in the circumstance of harm or hurt.
According to the law it is not law-abiding for a person to save someone's life at the risk of his own. hence, Jill cannot sue Jack for the negligence of the breach.
Therefore, option b. breach the element of negligence that cannot be proved.
Learn more about elements of negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/14480857
It is possible to amend (or change) a bill in committee or on the floor during debate.
a. True
b. False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Senators may debate each amendment without limit unless the Senate (1) agrees to a motion ... the text of the bill; a second-degree amendment proposes to change the text of a first-degree The Senate then acts on the committee amendments, after amendment is numbered at the time it is offered and read on the floor.
read the paragraph.
Legal members of the United States, or its citizens, have the right to participate in government. One way to become involved is by registering to vote in elections. People who can prove eligibility to vote are placed on an official list. To have permission to be a part of the process of choosing one’s government leaders, a person must show he or she is a legal adult (18 years old), a citizen of the United States (by birth or by naturalization), and a resident living permanently in the state in which he or she wishes to vote.
Based on the context of the paragraph, what is the meaning of eligibility?
A living in a place with an established address for an extended time
B following the rules of law
C meeting all the requirements to be allowed to do something
D using available resources to accomplish a goal
Answer:
C meeting all the requirements to be allowed to do something
Explanation:
I did the test!
why were the men at war in 1651
They were at war because there were series of disagreements about religion and the way the country should be ruled
Answer:
Image result for why were the men at war in 1651
The English Civil Wars (1642-1651) stemmed from conflict between Charles I and Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The first war was settled with Oliver Cromwell's victory for Parliamentary forces at the 1645 Battle of Naseby.
Explanation:
A defendant has the right to have counsel at a preliminary hearing and to have free counsel if the defendant cannot afford to hire an attorney. Why is the presence of counsel at a preliminary hearing believed to be so important
Answer:
The preliminary hearing is the stage of the criminal judicial process in which the Prosecutor will determine whether or not there are sufficient elements of evidence to incriminate the accused of a certain crime, imputing and prosecuting him.
Thus, within the evidence that is assessed in this hearing is the defendant's own statement, who will be questioned by judicial officials. Therefore, it is imperative that the defendant have a lawyer who previously advises him on what are the best strategies to face his defense, preventing the defendant from making mistakes that could put him at a disadvantage in the face of the charge.
Which branch approves bills
Answer:
judicial branch
Explanation:
Determine if the statement is true or false. A six pack refers to a simultaneous array that shows six photos arranged in two rows of three photos each.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
because a six pack is six extract arrange in two rows of three
Do you think the media or public judged OJ Simpson before the jury did?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
When people hear something they like to instantly believe that thing and start hating them.
Which statement about a theory is true?
A. It has two or more variables sharing a positive or negative relationship
B. No one can ever challenge or falsify it.
C. No further research is necessary once a theory comes into existence.
D. It is a statement that tests have yet to prove correct.
Answer: A. It has two or more variables sharing a positive or negative relationship
While off duty and at a party, Police Officer Woods was asked by the homeowner to get some ice from his basement. Since the ice machine was not immediately apparent, the officer opened two doors. Behind door number two were six marijuana plants. Officer Woods arrested the home owner. Did Officer Woods legally find the marijuana?
Answer:
No because he did not get consent from the onwer.
Explanation: