The film expresses American political issues circa 1920 and the making and interpretation of American history through its narrative, visual elements, and exploration of historical narratives, prompting viewers to reflect on the past and its relevance to contemporary society.
The film explores American political issues circa 1920 and the making and interpretation of American history through its narrative, visual elements, and character portrayals. Firstly, it delves into the social and political climate of the era, addressing themes such as women's suffrage, Prohibition, and the aftermath of World War I. These issues are highlighted through the interactions of the characters and their struggles within the historical context.
Furthermore, the film employs visual techniques to depict the era's political atmosphere. It may incorporate period-accurate costumes, set designs, and cinematography that evoke the ambiance of the 1920s, allowing the audience to immerse themselves in the historical context. By accurately representing the visual elements of the time, the film underscores its commitment to historical authenticity.
Regarding the making and interpretation of American history, the film may explore the construction and revision of historical narratives. It could depict characters who actively shape history through their actions and decisions, or it could challenge established historical interpretations by presenting alternative perspectives.
To learn more about American political
https://brainly.com/question/4592000
#SPJ4
What perceptions do you think U.S. citizens might have had of immigrants following McKinley’s assassination?
Answer:McKinley's assassination provides insight into how, when, and why the federal government began using threat
Explanation:McKinley's assassination provides insight into how, when, and why the federal government began using threat
Select the correct answer. how was persia divided in 1907? a. among russia, britain, and the shah of persia b. among russia, the shah of persia, and france c. between russia and britain d. between the shah of persia and britain
Persia divided in 1907 among russia, britain, and the shah of persia. The correct answer is A.
In 1907. As a result of the divide, the imperial ambitions of Britain and Russia were placated. The north of (modern-day Iran) came under the sway of Russia, while the south was influenced by England. In the middle, a puppet state that was advantageous to both Empires was created.
The civil uprisings of 1905 presented challenges to these countries' interests that discouraged liberal changes in the nation. When they decided to create The Anglo Russian Entente in 1907 since neither of them had accepted the societal changes, the lines were redrawn to favor a region that would otherwise have been detrimental to the status quo.
The middle of Persia continued to be in charge under the pretext of a neutral zone, together with a few foreign delegates who consistently supported old policies.
View the illustration below as a guide:
Find out more on Persia at https://brainly.com/question/18102866
#SPJ4
How did the colonies respond to the Intolerable Acts ?
What is the difference between cultural appropriation and cultural?
It's important to distinguish between cultural appropriation and appreciation since the former involves respecting a culture, whilst the latter involves insulting or dishonoring it.
How does cultural appropriation look in practice?
Even today, many non-Native Americans attend music festivals while donning Native American headdresses. Blackface has also been used by individuals as part of Halloween costumes. Both of these are instances of cultural appropriation, which can create a lot of justifiable offense.
What is meant by "cultural appropriation"?
Cultural appropriation is the act of majority group members adopting minority group cultural practices in an exploitative, offensive, or stereotypical way.
To know more about cultural appropriation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30243805
#SPJ4
lasalle accidentally lands in texas, sets up a french fort in spanish territory.a. trueb. false
True, LaSalle accidentally lands in texas and sets up a french fort in Spanish territory.
Starting with numerous issues, La Salle's fleet of four ships carrying 280 men and colonists eventually ended up landing at Matagorda Bay in modern-day Texas on February 20, 1685, rather than finding the mouth of the Mississippi.
In order to be able to attack Spanish villages and silver mines in Mexico, La Salle planned to build a French base close to them while France and Spain were at war. Some hypothetical maps from the time period depicted the Mississippi River, also known as the Rio del Espiritu Santo, emptying into the Gulf of Mexico not far from the Texas coastline bend. Spanish attention in Texas was redirected by the La Salle expedition from western Texas to eastern Texas. This area was also first investigated by the French.
To learn more about La Salle, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/13284382
#SPJ4
Ronald Reagan had to wait until four years to receive a presidential nomination because the Republican Party nominated sitting president in 1976.
Answer:
Gerald Ford was the sitting president at the time, so Reagan had to wait until 1980.
Which statement best describes the difference between these versions the war of the worlds?
The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects is the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of The War of the Worlds.
The War of the Worlds is a novel by H. G. Wells that was first published in 1898. The novel tells the story of an alien invasion of Earth by beings from the planet Martian. The War of the Worlds is considered to be one of the first science fiction novels.
There is no doubt that certain products and services have a greater aesthetic appeal than others. This is often what drives people's purchase decisions, especially when it comes to things like clothing and home décor. They can also convey a certain message or invoke a certain emotion.
Hence, the correct option is "B".
--------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"Which statement best describes the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of The War of the Worlds?
A. The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses description and soothing narration.
B. The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects.
C. The written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses an upbeat tone and characterization.
D. The written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses setting details and research."----------
To know more about War, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ4
Identify and explain the geographical circumstances that led to the development of the Byzantine Empire (6-7) sentences
Answer:It became one of the leading civilizations in the world before falling to an Ottoman Turkish onslaught in the 15th century.
Explanation:
Which letter represents the colony of Delaware on the map?
The Letter C is the letter that represents the colony of Delaware on the map.
What was the significance of colony of Delaware in U.S.?The colony of Delaware was one of the original thirteen British colonies in North America. It was originally settled by the Dutch in the early 17th century and was later taken over by the English.
The colony of Delaware played a significant role in the early history of the United States for several reasons:
Strategic Location: Delaware was located at the mouth of the Delaware River and had access to the Atlantic Ocean. This made it an important center for trade and commerce, and it was a major hub for shipping and transportation in the region.Agriculture: Delaware had a rich soil and a favorable climate for agriculture. It was a major producer of crops such as wheat, corn, and tobacco, which were important for the economy of the colony and for trade with other colonies and countries.Military Significance: Delaware was an important site for military operations during the American Revolution. The colony's location at the mouth of the Delaware River made it a strategic point for controlling access to the river and to the port of Philadelphia etc.Read more about colony of Delaware
brainly.com/question/11916932
#SPJ1
AP® WRITING HISTORICALLY
SAQ
Read the following question carefully and write a short response. Use complete sentences.
Using the following excerpts, answer (a), (b), and (c).
Source: Chandra Manning, The Fight Against Slavery, 2007
"Enlisted Union soldiers came to the conclusion that winning the war would require the
destruction of slavery partly because soldiers' personal observations of the South led many to
decide that slavery blighted everything it touched. Yet more influential than Union soldier's preexisting notions, or even their firsthand observations of the South, were their interactions with actual slaves, which led many to view slavery as a dehumanizing and evil institution that corroded the moral virtue necessary for a population to govern itself.
Hostility to slavery did not necessarily mean support for racial equality. In fact, white Union
soldiers strove mightily to keep the issues of slavery and black rights separate. [Still], contact with slaves and southern society convinced many Union troops that the immoral and blighting institution of slavery was antithetical to republican government, and that any republican government that tried to accommodate slavery was doomed to eventual failure……. [C]lear demands for the destruction of slavery plainly emerged among enlisted Union soldiers, especially those stationed in the slave states who were witnessing slavery with their own eyes for the first time. Even some border state Union soldiers joined the clamor, either because they had witnessed for years the violence that slavery could engender or out of shock and anger that slaveholders in their home states valued the peculiar institution over the Union. Slaves themselves did the most to force emancipation onto the Union agenda,. [primarily] by winning over enlisted Union soldiers, who, in the first year of the war, became the first major group after black Americans and abolitionists to call for an end to slavery…”
Source: Gary Gallagher, The Fight to Save the Union, 2011
"The loyal American citizenry fought a war for the Union that also killed slavery……. Union
always remained the paramount goal, a fact clearly expressed by Abraham Lincoln in
speeches and other statements designed to garner the widest popular support for the war
effort... That hardpan of unionism held millions of Americans to the task of suppressing the
slaveholders' rebellion, even as the human and material cost mushroomed.
[The Union] represented a cherished legacy of the founding generation, a democratic republic
with a constitution that guaranteed political liberty and afforded individuals a chance to
better themselves economically. From the perspective of loyal Americans, their republic stood
as the only hope for a democracy in [the] western world… [following] the failed European
revolutions of the 1840s. Slaveholding aristocrats who established the Confederacy … posed
a direct threat not only to the long-term success of the American republic but also to the
broader future of democracy. Issues related to the institution of slavery precipitated secession and the outbreak of fighting, but the loyal citizenry initially gave little thought to emancipation in their quest to save the Union. By the early summer of 1862, long before black men donned blue uniforms in large numbers, victorious Union armies stood poised to win the war with slavery largely intact. Eventually, most loyal citizens, though profoundly prejudiced by twenty-first century- standards and largely indifferent toward enslaved black people, embraced emancipation as a tool to punish slaveholders, weaken the Confederacy, and protect the Union from future internal strife."
a. Briefly describe ONE major difference between Manning's and Gallagher' historical
interpretations of the motivations of Union soldiers in the Civil War.
b. Briefly explain how ONE historical event or development from the period 1861 to 1865 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Manning's argument.
C. Briefly explain how ONE historical event or development from the period 1861 to 1865 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Gallagher's argument
One of the incidents that impacted the outcome of the American Civil War for the Union was the Vicksburg campaign in 1862.
What was the Vicksburg campaign?The Vicksburg campaign was a series of operations and engagements in the Western Theater of the American Civil War that were targeted at Vicksburg, Mississippi, a fortress city that commanded the final Confederate-held territory along the Mississippi River. Between December 26, 1862, and July 4, 1863, the campaign featured eleven different battles, numerous significant naval operations, army movements, and failed initiatives. Major General William Tecumseh Sherman, commanding half of Grant's force, was initially going to move to the Yazoo River and try to approach Vicksburg from the northeast, while Grant was going to lead the remaining soldiers down the Mississippi Central Railroad. After running the Vicksburg batteries, Union gunboats and troop transport boats eventually reached Grant's troops who had been marching into Louisiana on foot.
To learn more about Vicksburg, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15724809
#SPJ1
which region was responsible for colonizing the continent of africa?
How would the League of Nations handle conflicts between countries?
Answer:
Members of the League of Nations were required to respect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all other nation-states and to disavow the use or threat of military force as a means of resolving international conflicts.
Explanation:
The League could order League members not to do any trade with an aggressor nation in an effort to bring that aggressor nation to heel. If this failed, the League could introduce physical sanctions. This meant that military force would be used to put into place the League's decision.
Answer:
By establishing a bond of solidarity between Member States, the League is considered the first attempt to build a system of collective security. This principle relied on a simple idea: an aggressor against any Member State should be considered an aggressor against all the other Member States.
Mark brainiest
commonlit resistance to reservations answers
In the commonlit story -from resistance to reservations, the central idea of text is best identified by: The U.S. government prioritized the needs of American settlers and settlers over treaty rights to Native American lands.
What treaties were signed for Native Americans?In the first official peace treaty between the new United States and the Native American nations, the two sides agreed to maintain their friendship and support each other against Britain.
Why are treaties important to Native Americans?Indigenous peoples engaged in treaty negotiations to preserve and protect the sacred landscape that was their people and their home. They believed that every word exchanged was true and that the promises exchanged would be kept forever.
To learn more about treaty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/342530
#SPJ1
complete question is this:
In the CommonLit story -From Resistance to Reservations-
(You probably have to look it up)
Which of the following best identify the central idea of the text?
A.The U.S. government was justified to treat the Indians harshly because they lost the American Indian Wars.
B.The U.S. government put the needs of American settlers and homesteaders over the treaty-protected rights of American Indians to their land.
C.The U.S. government did the best possible by taking land from a few Indians to give to many settlers, minimizing violence for both sides.
D.The Indians who did not resist American advancement and retreated to reservations were treated better than those who fought and eventually surrendered to the U.S. government.
E.The Seventh Cavalry got revenge for the Battle of the Little Bighorn at the massacre of Wounded Knee.
F.Life was difficult for Indians on reservations because they could not practice their ancestral ways of living nor adapt to new ways without proper resources and guidance
Ead the ection titled ""European Arrival. "" Decribe what happened to the firt Spaniard to arrive in preent day New Mexico and the etablihment of Santa Fe. (Site 1)
Inhabited by Native Americans for thousands of years before European exploration, New Mexico was colonized by the Spaniards in 1598 and annexed to the Viceroyalty of New Spain. It was then part of an independent Mexico, but as a result of the Mexican-American War it became a territory of the United States and eventually a state.
The First Expedition Francisco Vázquez de Coronado, from 1540 he met a large expedition between 1542 at Compostela (or perhaps Tepic, today's ancient stronghold of Compostela), and called Cabeza de - Said Baka has just arrived, he of Cibola has explored and found the Seven Golden Cities. From his eight-year arduous journey from Florida to Mexico. The men of Coronado discovered several villages with mud houses in 1541. Other expeditions to the Southwest or the Great Plains thereafter failed to find a great city. Dejected and now impoverished, Coronado and his men left New Mexico and began their journey back to Mexico.
In his 1598 expedition from Zacatecas, more than fifty years after Coronado, Juan de Oñate founded the colony of San his Juan in the Rio Grande. Onate extended his so-called Camino his Real over 966 km (600 mi). Oñate was appointed the first governor of the new state of New Mexico. The Akama Indians rebelled against this Spanish invasion, but were severely punished.
In 1609, Pedro de Peralta (later governor of the province) founded Santa Fe del Yunque at the foot of the Sierra de la Sangre de Cristo. This was ten years before the first British settlers arrived on the shores of New England on board the Mayflower, making Santa Fe the oldest capital city in the United States. As a result of the successful Pueblo Rebellion, the city, along with most of the state's colonized areas, was abandoned by the Spaniards for 12 years (1680-1692). Pueblo Indians drove the Spaniards to El Paso
Learn more about first Spaniards here:https://brainly.com/question/10928879
#SPJ4
Was there a drought in the 1930s?
Yes. During the 1930s, the large area of farmlands in America and Canada experienced droughts known as the dust bowl.
What is meant by the dust bowl?The Dust Bowl, which occurred in the 1930s, was a period of very damaging dust storms that gravely damaged the environment and agriculture of the American and Canadian plains.
The majority of the Dust Bowl region is made up of the High Plains, which are situated west of the 100th meridian and range in terrain from rolling in the north to flat in the Llano Estacado.
The agricultural area on the 16 million acres (6.5 million hectares) of the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles took the brunt of the Dust Bowl's effects.
To know more about drought, visit:
brainly.com/question/26693108
#SPJ4
How did anarchists impact the labor movement?
We Anarchist-Syndicalists consider trade unions to be a powerful tool in the fight for better working conditions, as well as the fight against racism and injustice.
What does the label "anarchist" mean?one who rebels against every ruling power, established order, or authority. a person who supports anarchism or anarchy and believes in it. Particularly: someone who challenges the current order through violent means.
Do anarchists have a religious belief?The majority of anarchists are atheists, which is a reality. They disbelieve in god and are hostile to all religions, especially organized religion. In today's secularized western European nations, religion no longer holds the hegemonic position it once did in society.
To know more about anarchists visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13769521
#SPJ1
What was one outcome of the Battle of Trenton?
Answer:
Despite the large number of Hessians that escaped Trenton, Washington still won a crucial strategic and material victory. In only one hour of fighting, the Continental Army captured nearly nine hundred Hessian officers and soldiers as well as a large supply of muskets, bayonets, swords, and cannons.
How did other writers use WWI to reflect current society? Give one writer and an example of their belief in answering this question.
Many writers used World War I as a lens through which to examine and comment on the society of their time.
One notable example is Ernest Hemingway, who served as an ambulance driver during the war.
How is World War I described by Ernest Hemingway in his novel?In his novel "A Farewell to Arms," Hemingway portrays the war as an absurd and senseless tragedy, and the characters in the novel struggle with feelings of disillusionment and loss.
Through this, Hemingway reflects the belief that the war was a devastating and futile event that had a profound impact on the individuals who lived through it. He also reflects the disillusionment of the society after the war, and the lost of idealism and trust in institutions like the Church and the State.
Read more about WWI
brainly.com/question/27400269
#SPJ1
Who did the Ottoman Empire help in ww1?
Which states had slaves in 1790?
Answer:
Slave states Year Year
North Carolina 1789 1788
Kentucky 1792 1790
Tennessee 1796 1791
Louisiana 1812 1803
Explanation:
Brainliest pls
Explain three ways that you benefit from public
goods from the local, state, or national
government.
Social advantages- Public goods must offer some sort of social advantage to the entire society. Public commodities are non-rivalrous and indestructible. Public products must be widely accessible.
What are Public Goods?A society or community's public goods must have two essential characteristics in order to be considered public goods they cannot be excluded from use and they cannot compete with one another. They are available to use for everyone, and their use does not reduce their availability for use in the future. In general, products that are available to everyone are referred to as public goods. In contrast to common goods, which are typically non-excludable yet are often somewhat rivalrous, these items are not commonly owned. An illustration of a common good is wild game utilized for food. It can normally be obtained and used by anyone; however, the same animal cannot be used more than once.
To know more about Public Goods visit: brainly.com/question/14975509
#SPJ1
Think about everything that happened in Russia in the 1800s. Now imagine that you have the opportunity to go back in time to advise Russian czars on what actions to take to avoid the Revolution of 1905. Based on what you’ve learned about the history of this period, what would you suggest those czars do differently? What outcomes do you hope would result from your advice?
If I were to go back in time and advise Russian czars on how to avoid the Revolution of 1905, I would suggest a number of different actions they could take.
Firstly, I would advise them to implement more comprehensive and effective land and economic reforms. The vast majority of the Russian population were poor peasants and they were heavily impacted by the lack of land and economic opportunities. By implementing these reforms, the government could have helped to reduce poverty and improve the standard of living for many people, which would have reduced the level of discontent and dissatisfaction with the government.
Secondly, I would recommend the Czars to implement more liberal political reforms, such as granting more civil liberties, rights, and freedoms to the people. This could have included freedom of speech, press, and assembly, which would have allowed people to express their grievances and frustrations with the government more openly and peacefully, which would have reduced the likelihood of violent rebellion.
Finally, I would advise Czars to build a better relationship with the working class and the intelligentsia. Many of the revolutionaries in 1905 came from these groups, and by building a better relationship with them, the government could have reduced their sense of alienation and marginalization and reduced the likelihood of rebellion.
I hope that, by taking these actions, the Czars could have avoided the Revolution of 1905 and prevented the loss of lives and property that resulted from it. Additionally, these actions could have helped to create a more stable and prosperous Russia, which would have benefited all of its citizens.
What year did the name of the organization change from future homemakers of america to family career and community leaders of america?
The name of the organization change from future homemakers of America to family career and community leaders of America in 1999.
The official groundbreaking ceremony at the construction site in Reston, Virginia, took place on September 28, 1981. The 1983 National Leadership Meeting in Washington, DC saw the dedication of the national headquarters and leadership center.
Thomas Lucas of Milton, West Virginia, was chosen as the group's first male national president in July 1986. Voting delegates approved the proposed name change from the Future Homemakers of America to the Family, Career and Community Leaders of America in July 1999 at the National Leadership Conference in Boston, Massachusetts.
Thousands of FCCLA members attended the "70 Years Strong" anniversary event that the organization organized on Capitol Hill in July 2015 to support the teaching of Family and Consumer Sciences (FACS) in schools.
To know more about FCCLA:
https://brainly.com/question/28357732
#SPJ4
compare and contrast the perspectives of imperial powers and those colonized.
i need this ASAP please.
The imperial powers viewed colonization as a way to expand their influence and bring modernization to the colonized peoples, while the colonized peoples saw it as exploitative and oppressive, resulting in loss of autonomy and traditional ways of life, discrimination and marginalization.
What are the perspectives of imperial powers and those colonized?Imperial powers, such as European countries, saw their colonization of other lands as a way to expand their economic and political influence, as well as to spread their culture and civilization to "uncivilized" peoples. They often justified their actions by claiming that they were bringing modernization and progress to the colonized peoples, and that they were fulfilling a "civilizing mission."
In contrast, the perspectives of those who were colonized were often very different. The colonized peoples often saw the actions of the imperial powers as exploitative and oppressive. They were forced to adapt to the culture, religion and economic systems imposed by the imperial powers, and were denied self-rule and autonomy.
The colonized peoples also often experienced violence, forced displacement, and loss of land, resources, and traditional ways of life. They were also subject to discrimination and marginalization, and were often treated as second-class citizens in their own lands.
Read more about perspectives
brainly.com/question/13107415
#SPJ1
what is zakaat? what is emphasized in zakaat
Answer:
chilling
Explanation:
no exceptions
How do you write a personal narrative paragraph?
Personal narratives focus on a particular real life event that was pivotal or important for the writer.
Consider a life event or incident that stands out in your mind. The personal narrative should center on a particular occasion or experience that stands out in your memory or has had a significant impact on you. It doesn't have to be a significant event as long as you find it memorable and significant. The incident may have appeared little at the time, but it ended up having a profound impact on your life. Write, for instance, about your body-image issues from high school and how you dealt with them as an adult. You might also talk about how your mother's relationship was impacted by your terrible 15th birthday party.
Learn more about real life here:
https://brainly.com/question/29455905
#SPJ4
international fellowship of christians and jews reviews
The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ) is a non-profit organization that aims to build bridges of understanding and cooperation between Christians and Jews.
The organization receives generally positive reviews, with many praising its efforts to promote interfaith dialogue and understanding. However, some reviewers have criticized the organization for its support of certain political causes and leaders in Israel. The IFCJ has been praised for its efforts to promote understanding and cooperation between Christians and Jews through various programs and initiatives.
These include providing humanitarian aid to those in need in Israel and other countries, supporting Jewish communities and individuals around the world, and promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding. Many reviewers note that the organization's work is important and valuable, and that it is making a positive difference in the world.
However, some reviewers have criticized the IFCJ for its political stance and support of certain political causes and leaders in Israel. These critics argue that the organization's political activities detract from its mission of promoting interfaith understanding, and that its support of certain individuals and groups may be divisive. Despite these criticisms, the organization continues to receive positive feedback from many supporters and those it has helped, and it continues to play an important role in promoting interfaith understanding and cooperation.
Learn more about Christians
brainly.com/question/11541955
#SPJ4
The complete Question is -
What are the reviews of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ)?
what were the consequences of germany signing the treaty of verailles
Answer
Lost parts of its land, accept blame for the war, lead to financial problems, and lots of limits were placed on their military
Explanation:
Pls help me why do they
Foreign powers may want to control cities like Hong Kong and Port Arthur due to the strategic geographic locations and economic benefits associated with them. These cities have access to important resources and trade routes, allowing a foreign power to have greater influence in the region. Additionally, gaining control of these cities could give a foreign power greater access to economic opportunities, such as tariffs and taxation.
Have a great day :)
How do presidential terms differ from congress and the supreme court?
Legislative: Laws are passed by Congress, which is composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bulk of government entities, including the President, Vice President, and Cabinet, make decisions and implement laws. Laws are assessed by courts, including the Supreme Court.
What limitations does the Supreme Court place on the power of the president and Congress?The Supreme Court's most well-known authority is judicial review, or the ability to declare a legislative or executive action to be in violation of the Constitution. However, the language of the Constitution does not include this authority. The court stated this theory in Marbury v. Madison (1803).
What should the correct relationship between the Supreme Court, Congress, and the President be?The U.S. Congress is the primary legislative body of the nation in relation to the president and Supreme Court. However, the founding fathers of the United States devised a system that allowed three powerful branches of the government to curb one another's power through a series of checks and balances.
Learn more about judicial review: https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ1