How do you solve 7x 9 23?

Let's choose c = (p + q) / 2. Since p < q, it follows that (p + q) / 2 lies between f(p) and f(q). Therefore, there exists an x between p and q such that f(x) = (p + q) / 2.

To prove the proposition "if p and q are real numbers with p < q, then there exists an x in the real numbers such that p < x < q," we can use the intermediate value theorem.

Proof:

Assume p and q are real numbers with p < q.

Consider the function f(x) = x defined on the interval [p, q]. Since f(x) is a continuous function on this interval, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that for any value c between f(p) and f(q), there exists a value x between p and q such that f(x) = c.

Know more about real numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/551408

#SPJ11

As seasonal index of 1 indicates that the season is average. This means that the data for the season falls in line with what is expected based on historical trends and patterns.

Seasonal indexes are used to adjust data for seasonal variations so that the underlying trends can be analyzed accurately. For example, a retailer may use seasonal indexes to adjust their sales data to account for the higher sales volume during the holiday season.

It is important to understand seasonal indexes when analyzing data and making business decisions based on seasonal trends.

A seasonal index of 0.5 would indicate that the season is weaker than average, while a seasonal index of 10 or 100 would suggest that the season is much stronger than average.

To learn more about : average

https://brainly.com/question/130657

#SPJ11

A seasonal index is a tool used in data analysis to measure the level of seasonal variation in a given time series. An index of 1 indicates that the season is average, meaning that there is no significant deviation from the expected seasonal pattern.

A seasonal index is a numerical value that represents the relative level of a variable, such as sales or demand, during a particular season. It is usually represented as a ratio or percentage that compares the actual value of a variable to its expected value during a particular season.  An index below 1 means that the season is below average, while an index above 1 means that the season is above average.

A seasonal index of 1 (E) indicates that the season is average because it implies that the observed value during that season is equal to the overall average for all seasons. In this case, there is no significant seasonal variation or deviation from the mean.

Therefore, in the given question, the correct answer is E) 1, which means that the season is average and there is no significant deviation from the expected seasonal pattern. The use of seasonal indices is crucial in predicting future trends, identifying anomalies, and making informed decisions in various industries, such as agriculture, retail, and tourism.

Learn more about seasonal index here: brainly.com/question/31811419.

#SPJ11

The graph is attached below.

To plot the graph of the equation y = tan(x + 90°) - 1, we can follow these steps:

x | y = tan(x + 90°) - 1

-180° | undefined

-135° | 1

-90° | 0

-45° | -1

0° | undefined

45° | -1

90° | 0

135° | 1

180° | undefined

Note: The values are given in degrees.

Here is a graph of the equation y = tan(x + 90°) - 1 is attached.

Learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

a) To prove the inequality (E(X1X2))2≤E(X21)E(X22), we can start by expanding the square on the left-hand side:
(E(X1X2))2 = (cov(X1,X2) + E(X1)E(X2))2
= cov(X1,X2)2 + 2cov(X1,X2)E(X1)E(X2) + (E(X1)E(X2))2
Using the fact that cov(X1,X2) = E(X1X2) - E(X1)E(X2), we can rewrite the above expression as:
E(X1X2)2 - 2E(X1X2)E(X1)E(X2) + E(X1)2E(X2)2
Now, note that for any real number t, E((tX1−X2)2)≥0. This means that the discriminant of the quadratic expression t2E(X1)2 - 2tE(X1X2) + E(X2)2 is non-positive. Therefore,
(E(X1X2))2 - E(X21)E(X22) ≤ 0
which proves the desired inequality.
b) Using part (a), we have:
rho2 = (cov(X1,X2) / (sd(X1)sd(X2)))2 ≤ 1
where sd(X1) and sd(X2) are the standard deviations of X1 and X2, respectively.
Since the standard deviations are positive, we can take the square root of both sides to obtain:
|rho| ≤ 1

Part (a) is proven by expanding the square on the left-hand side and using the fact that E((tX1−X2)2)≥0 for any real number t. Part (b) follows from part (a) and the fact that the correlation coefficient is bounded between -1 and 1.

To know more standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

To calculate the 4-period centered moving average associated with period 6, we need to consider the values of the series in a window of four periods centered around period 6.

The window would include the values from periods 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Observation: 4 5 6 7

Value: 12 20 21 21

To calculate the centered moving average, we sum up the values in the window and divide by the number of periods in the window.

Average = (12 + 20 + 21 + 21) / 4 = 74 / 4 = 18.5

Therefore, the value of the 4-period centered moving average associated with period 6 is 18.5.

The correct answer is option b. 18.500

Learn more about centered moving average here:

https://brainly.com/question/29509932

#SPJ11

Answer:

£25

Step-by-step explanation:

ratio 5:3 means there are 5 + 3 = 8 parts.

40/8 = 5.

we have 5(5) + 3(5) = 25 + 15 = 40.

the largest part is  £25.

Answer: If you need to find the area of the window it would be, 2,448.

Step-by-step explanation: To find the area you must multiply width times length.

The inverse Laplace transform of 1/((s-1)^2 (s+1)) is (1/4)e^t - (1/2)te^t + (1/4)e^(-t).

To find the inverse Laplace transform of the given function:

F(s) = 1 / ((s-1)^2 (s+1))

We can use partial fraction decomposition to break it down into simpler terms:

F(s) = A / (s-1) + B / (s-1)^2 + C / (s+1)

To solve for the coefficients A, B, and C, we can multiply both sides of the equation by the denominator and substitute in values of s to obtain a system of linear equations. After solving for A, B, and C, we get:

A = 1/4, B = -1/2, and C = 1/4

Now, we can use the inverse Laplace transform formulas to obtain the time domain function:

f(t) = (1/4)e^t - (1/2)te^t + (1/4)e^(-t)

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of 1/((s-1)^2 (s+1)) is (1/4)e^t - (1/2)te^t + (1/4)e^(-t).

To know more about  inverse Laplace .

https://brainly.com/question/27753787

#SPJ11

The inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s-1)^2(s+1) is 1/2 e^t + 1/2 t e^t - 1/4 e^-t.

The inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s-1)^2(s+1) is:

f(t) = L^-1 {1/(s-1)^2(s+1)}

Using partial fraction decomposition:

1/(s-1)^2(s+1) = A/(s-1) + B/(s-1)^2 + C/(s+1)

Multiplying both sides by (s-1)^2(s+1), we get:

1 = A(s-1)(s+1) + B(s+1) + C(s-1)^2

Substituting s=1, we get:

1 = 2B

B = 1/2

Substituting s=-1, we get:

1 = 4C

C = 1/4

Substituting B and C back into the equation, we get:

1/(s-1)^2(s+1) = 1/(2(s-1)) + 1/(2(s-1)^2) - 1/(4(s+1))

Taking the inverse Laplace transform of each term, we get:

f(t) = L^-1 {1/(2(s-1))} + L^-1 {1/(2(s-1)^2)} - L^-1 {1/(4(s+1))}

Using the Laplace transform table, we get:

f(t) = 1/2 e^t + 1/2 t e^t - 1/4 e^-t

Know more about inverse Laplace transform here:

https://brainly.com/question/31322563

#SPJ11

The average atomic mass of the element in the data table is given as follows:

28.1 amu.

The mean of a data-set is given by the sum of all observations in the data-set divided by the cardinality of the data-set, which represents the number of observations in the data-set.

For the weighed mean, we calculate the mean as the sum of each observation multiplied by it's weight.

Hence the average atomic mass of the element in the data table is given as follows:

0.922297 x 27.977 + 0.046832 x 28.976 + 0.030872 x 29.974 = 28.1 amu.

More can be learned about the mean of a data-set at https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ1

a. The mean age (20.5 years) and standard deviation (2.6 years) you provided are considered statistics.

This is because they are calculated from a sample (all the students at a small college) rather than the entire population of college students. Statistics are numerical summaries that describe the characteristics of a sample, whereas parameters describe the characteristics of an entire population.

b. To label both numbers:
- Mean age (20.5 years): This number represents the average age of students at the small college. The mean is calculated by adding all the ages and dividing by the total number of students in the sample. It is a statistic since it is based on a sample and not the entire population of college students.

- Standard deviation (2.6 years): This number indicates the degree of variation or dispersion of the ages of students in the sample. A higher standard deviation indicates a greater spread in ages, while a lower value suggests a more consistent age range. This, too, is a statistic as it is calculated from the sample rather than the entire population.

Remember, the key distinction between statistics and parameters is that statistics describe samples, while parameters describe entire populations.

You can learn more about standard deviation at: brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

The reflection of vector v=[293] in the line l that consists of all scalar multiples of the vector w=[22−1] is [-17, 192, 73].

The reflection of vector v=[293] in the line l that consists of all scalar multiples of the vector w=[22−1] is [-17, 192, 73].

To find the reflection of vector v in the line l, we need to decompose vector v into two components: one component parallel to the line l and the other component perpendicular to the line l. The component parallel to the line l is obtained by projecting v onto w, which gives us:

proj_w(v) = ((v dot w)/||w||^2) * w = (68/5) * [22,-1] = [149.6, -6.8]

The component perpendicular to the line l is obtained by subtracting the parallel component from v, which gives us:

perp_w(v) = v - proj_w(v) = [293,0,0] - [149.6, -6.8, 0] = [143.4, 6.8, 0]

The reflection of v in the line l is obtained by reversing the direction of the perpendicular component and adding it to the parallel component, which gives us:

refl_l(v) = proj_w(v) - perp_w(v) = [149.6, -6.8, 0] - [-143.4, -6.8, 0] = [-17, 192, 73]

Therefore, the reflection of vector v=[293] in the line l that consists of all scalar multiples of the vector w=[22−1] is [-17, 192, 73].

Learn more about reflection here

https://brainly.com/question/29788343

#SPJ11

The amount of glitter that is needed to cover the prism completely is 87.6 kg.

In Mathematics, the surface area of a triangular prism can be calculated by using this mathematical expression:

Total surface area of triangular prism = (Perimeter of the base × Length of the prism) + (2 × Base area)

Total surface area of triangular prism = (S₁ + S₂ + S₃)L + bh

where:

By substituting the given side lengths into the formula for the surface area of a triangular prism, we have the following;

Total surface area of triangular prism = (13 × 25) + (1/2 × 21 × 10 × 2) + (16 × 25) + (21 × 25)

Total surface area of triangular prism = 325 + 210 + 400 + 525

Total surface area of triangular prism = 1,460 m².

For the amount of glitter that is needed, we have:

Amount of glitter = (60 × 1,460)/1000

Amount of glitter = 87.6 kg.

Read more on triangular prism here: brainly.com/question/21173224

#SPJ1

The slope of the tangent line of the function f(x) = √x is 1/2√a

To determine the slope of the tangent line of the given function, we have to find the derivative of the function and take the evaluation at that point.

Given;

f(x) = √x

Using the power rule in differentiation;

[tex]f'(x) = \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{1}{2}x^-^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

To determine the slope of the tangent line, let's find the evaluation of the derivative at this specific point.

Assuming;

x = a

[tex]f'(a) = \frac{1}{2}a^-^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

This implies that the slope of the tangent line to f(x) at the specific point is ;

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{a}[/tex]

Note that since the square root function has a non-zero slope for positive values of x, the slope of the tangent line exists for all positive values of a.

Learn more on slope of a tangent line here;

https://brainly.com/question/30402311

#SPJ1

The Fourier series for f(x) is: f(x) = \frac{\pi^2}{3} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2}{n^2} \cos(nx)$

The Fourier series of f(x) = x^2, where -π < x < π, can be found using the formula:

$a_0 = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} x^2 dx = \frac{\pi^2}{3}$

$a_n = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} x^2 \cos(nx) dx = \frac{2}{n^2}$

$b_n = 0$ for all n, since f(x) is an even function

Know more about Fourier series here:

https://brainly.com/question/31705799

#SPJ11

It is important to consider the limitations of the regression line and the potential consequences of extrapolation before making any predictions outside of the range of observed data.  Option D is the correct answer.

The answer to whether it is appropriate to use a regression line to predict y-values for x-values that are not in (or close to) the range of x-values found in the data depends on the context and purpose of the analysis.

However, in general, option D, "It is not appropriate because the regression line models the trend of the given data, and it is not known if the trend continues beyond the range of those data" is the most accurate.

The regression line represents the trend observed in the given data and is not necessarily indicative of what may happen outside of that range.

Extrapolating beyond the range of data can lead to unreliable predictions, and it is better to use caution and only make predictions within the range of observed data.

To learn more about :  regression line

https://brainly.com/question/17004137

#SPJ11

D. It is not appropriate because the regression line models the trend of the given data, and it is not known if the trend continues beyond the range of those data.

D. It is not appropriate because the regression line models the trend of the given data, and it is not known if the trend continues beyond the range of those data. The regression line is based on the values within the range of the data, and extrapolating outside of that range may not accurately reflect the trend. It is important to consider the limitations of the data and the model when using regression to make predictions.

The term "regression" was coined by Francis Galton in the 19th century to describe a biological phenomenon. The result is that the height of descendants of higher ancestors returns to the original mean (this phenomenon is also called regression to the mean).

Learn more about regression lines:

brainly.com/question/29753986

#SPJ11

The system of linear equation that represent this problem is

6x + 10y = 900

10x + 4y = 1220

Let's represent the number of CDs Roberto bought as x and the number of magazines as y

The problem states the following information:

Using the variables;  x and y as given;

1. Roberto bought 6 CDs and 10 magazines for $900.00 pesos. This can be represented as the equation:

  6x + 10y = 900

2. María bought 10 CDs and 4 magazines for $1,220.00 pesos. This can be represented as the equation:

  10x + 4y = 1220

So, the system of equations representing the problem is:

6x + 10y = 900

10x + 4y = 1220

learn more on system of linear equation here;

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1

Translation: Roberto bought 6 cd's and 10 magazines for $900.00 pesos; In the same store, her friend María bought 10 CDs and 4

magazines at $1,220.00 pesos. What is the system of equations with two unknowns that represents the problem?

the actual distance between Snake World and the International Space Center is 76 miles.

To find the actual distance in miles between Snake World and the International Space Center, we need to use the given scale of the map: 5 inches = 95 miles.

If 5 inches on the map represents 95 miles, we can set up a proportion to find the actual distance in miles for the measured length on the map.

Let's denote the actual distance in miles as "x".

According to the given scale, we have the proportion:

5 inches / 95 miles = 4 inches / x miles

We can cross-multiply to solve for x:

5 inches * x miles = 4 inches * 95 miles

Simplifying further:

5x = 380

Dividing both sides by 5:

x = 380 / 5

Calculating the value:

x = 76

To know more about distance visit:

brainly.com/question/15172156

#SPJ11

A cyclic subgroup of A8 with order 4 is ⟨(1234)⟩. A noncyclic subgroup of A8 with order 4 is ⟨(12)(34), (13)(24)⟩.

To find a cyclic subgroup of A8 with order 4, we need to look for an element that generates a cyclic subgroup of order 4. One such element is (1234), which means it cyclically permutes the elements 1, 2, 3, and 4. The subgroup generated by (1234) is ⟨(1234)⟩, and its order is 4.

To find a noncyclic subgroup of A8 with order 4, we can consider elements that do not generate cyclic subgroups. One such subgroup is ⟨(12)(34), (13)(24)⟩, which consists of the permutations (12)(34) and (13)(24). This subgroup does not have a cyclic structure because neither of its generators generates a cyclic subgroup.

The order of this subgroup is also 4.

For more questions like Subgroup click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30865357

#SPJ11

A. Brazil is in the 30th percentile in terms of Olympic medal count in this dataset.

B. Japan is in the 40th percentile in terms of Olympic medal count in this dataset.

C. Russia is in the 50th percentile in terms of Olympic medal count in this dataset.

D. China is in the 90th percentile in terms of Olympic medal count in this dataset.

A. To find the percentile rank of Brazil, we need to first determine the total number of countries in the dataset. In this case, there are 10 countries.

Next, we need to determine how many countries Brazil outperformed in terms of medal count. Looking at the table, we can see that Brazil has more medals than 3 countries (Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil itself) and less than 6 countries (Canada, China, France, Great Britain, Japan, and the United States).

Therefore, the percentile rank of Brazil can be calculated as follows:

Percentile rank of Brazil = (number of countries Brazil outperformed / total number of countries) x 100%

= (3 / 10) x 100%

= 30%

B. To find the percentile rank of Japan, we can follow the same approach as above.

Number of countries Japan outperformed: 4 (Australia, Brazil, Canada, and New Zealand)

Number of countries Japan was outperformed by: 5 (China, France, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States)

Percentile rank of Japan = (number of countries Japan outperformed / total number of countries) x 100%

= (4 / 10) x 100%

= 40%

C. To find the percentile rank of Russia, we can follow the same approach as above.

Number of countries Russia outperformed: 5 (Australia, Brazil, Canada, New Zealand, and Japan)

Number of countries Russia was outperformed by: 4 (China, France, Great Britain, and the United States)

Percentile rank of Russia = (number of countries Russia outperformed / total number of countries) x 100%

= (5 / 10) x 100%

= 50%

D. To find the percentile rank of China, we can follow the same approach as above.

Number of countries China outperformed: 9 (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, Russia, and the United States)

Number of countries China was outperformed by: 0

Percentile rank of China = (number of countries China outperformed / total number of countries) x 100%

= (9 / 10) x 100%

= 90%

for such more question on  percentile

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ11

To find the percentile rank of each country, we need to determine how many countries have a lower total medal count and then divide that number by the total number of countries (which is 10 in this case) and multiply by 100.

A. Brazil:
There are 9 countries with a higher total medal count than Brazil, so its percentile rank is (9/10) x 100 = 90th percentile.

B. Japan:
There are 5 countries with a lower total medal count than Japan, so its percentile rank is (5/10) x 100 = 50th percentile.

Learn more about percentile here : brainly.com/question/1561673

#SPJ11

The series converges on the interval from 7 inclusive to 9 exclusive.

To find the radius of convergence, we use the ratio test:

So the series converges absolutely if |x - 8| < 1, and diverges if |x - 8| > 1. Therefore, the radius of convergence is R = 1.

To find the interval of convergence, we need to test the endpoints x = 7 and x = 9:

When x = 7, the series becomes:

[infinity] (-1)ⁿ (n+9) / (n+1)

n = 0

which is an alternating series that satisfies the conditions of the alternating series test. Therefore, it converges.

When x = 9, the series becomes:

[infinity] 1 / (n+1)

n = 0

which is a p-series with p = 1, which diverges.

Therefore, the interval of convergence is [7, 9).

Learn more about p-series

brainly.com/question/30880784

#SPJ11

We can calculate the amount of money Bonnie will have in her savings account after 3 years using the simple interest formula:

A = P(1 + rt)

where A is the total amount of money at the end of the time period, P is the initial principal or deposit, r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal), and t is the time period in years.

In this case, Bonnie deposits $70.00 into her savings account and earns 4.5% simple interest a year. We know that she does not add or take out any money for 3 years. Therefore:

P = $70.00

r = 0.045 (since the interest rate is given as a percentage, we need to divide by 100 to get the decimal form)

t = 3 years

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

A = $70.00(1 + 0.045 x 3)

A = $70.00(1.135)

A = $79.45

Therefore, Bonnie will have $79.45 in her savings account at the end of 3 years.

To learn more about simple interest click here : brainly.com/question/30964674

#SPJ11

The statement is True.

A test statistic value of 2.14 puts it in the rejection region, which means that if the null hypothesis is true, the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as 2.14 or more extreme is less than the significance level of the test. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis at the given significance level.

If the test statistic is actually 2.19, which is more extreme than 2.14, then the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as 2.19 or more extreme under the null hypothesis is even smaller than the probability corresponding to a test statistic of 2.14.

This means that the p-value for the test is even smaller than the significance level, and we reject the null hypothesis with even greater confidence.

In other words, if the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value, the p-value is smaller than the significance level, and we reject the null hypothesis at the given significance level with greater confidence.

To know more about null hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The probability that event E occurs, given that the odds in favor are 8 to 3, is approximately 0.727. The correct option is (c).

For the probability of event E occurring when the odds in favor are 8 to 3, we can use the formula for odds and probability conversion.

The odds in favor of event E occurring are given as 8 to 3. This means that for every 8 favorable outcomes, there are 3 unfavorable outcomes. In total, there are 8 + 3 = 11 outcomes.

To calculate the probability, we divide the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of outcomes.

The number of favorable outcomes is 8, and the total number of outcomes is 11. Therefore, the probability of event E occurring is 8/11.

Converting this to a decimal, we find that the probability is approximately 0.727.

It is important to note that odds are different from probabilities. Odds represent the ratio of favorable to unfavorable outcomes, while probabilities represent the likelihood of an event occurring on a scale from 0 to 1.

So, the probability that event E occurs is approximately 0.727, which corresponds to choice (c).

To know more about probability refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/16722133#

#SPJ11

The minimum service rate that must be provided is 1.609 units per period.

To solve this problem, we need to use the M/M/1 queueing model, where the arrival process follows a Poisson distribution, the service process follows an exponential distribution, and there is one server.

We can use Little's law to relate the average number of units in the system to the arrival rate and the average service time:

L = λ * W

where L is the average number of units in the system, λ is the arrival rate, and W is the average time spent in the system.

From the problem statement, we want to find the minimum service rate  in the system not exceeding 0.20. This means that we want to find the maximum value of W such that P(W ≥ 0.20) ≤ 0.80.

Using the M/M/1 queueing model, we know that the average time spent in the system is:

W = Wq + 1/μ

where Wq is the average time spent waiting in the queue and μ is the service rate.

Since we want to find the minimum service rate, we can assume that there is no waiting in the queue (i.e., Wq = 0).

Plugging in Wq = 0 and λ = 0.5 into Little's law, we get:

L = λ * W = λ * (1/μ)

Since we want P(W ≥ 0.20) ≤ 0.80, we can use the complementary probability:

P(W < 0.20) ≥ 0.20

Using the formula for the exponential distribution, we can calculate:

P(W < 0.20) = 1 - e^(-μ * 0.20)

Setting this expression greater than or equal to 0.20 and solving for μ, we get:

μ ≥ -ln(0.80) / 0.20 ≈ 1.609

To know more about minimum service rate refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1501065

#SPJ11

Common multiples and denominators are both concepts related to numbers, but they have different roles and purposes. Common multiples are used to find numbers that are multiples of two or more given numbers, while denominators specifically refer to the bottom number in a fraction.

Common multiples are numbers that are divisible by two or more given numbers. They are used to find numbers that are evenly divisible by a set of numbers. For example, the common multiples of 3 and 4 are 12, 24, 36, etc., as these numbers are divisible by both 3 and 4.

Denominators, on the other hand, are specific to fractions. In a fraction, the denominator represents the bottom number, indicating the total number of equal parts into which the whole is divided. It determines the size and proportion of each part of the fraction. For instance, in the fraction 3/5, the denominator is 5, indicating that the whole is divided into five equal parts.

While common multiples involve finding numbers divisible by given numbers, denominators are exclusively used in fractions to represent the number of equal parts in a whole. In this way, they serve different purposes. However, they are alike in the sense that they both deal with numbers and can be used in mathematical calculations and relationships.

Learn more about  Common multiples here :

https://brainly.com/question/2550150

#SPJ11

We know that the probability density function of Y is:

f y(y) =

{-4/y^5 y > 0

{0 otherwise

To find the probability density function (PDF) of Y, we need to first find the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of Y and then differentiate it with respect to Y.

Let Y = 1/X. Solving for X, we get X = 1/Y.

Using the change of variables method, we have:

Fy(y) = P(Y <= y) = P(1/X <= y) = P(X >= 1/y) = 1 - P(X < 1/y)

Since the PDF of X is given by:

fx(x) =

{4x^3 0 <= x <=10

{0 otherwise

We have:

P(X < 1/y) = ∫[0,1/y] 4x^3 dx = [x^4]0^1/y = (1/y^4)

Therefore,

Fy(y) = 1 - (1/y^4) = (y^-4) for y > 0.

To find the PDF of Y, we differentiate the CDF with respect to Y:

f y(y) = d(F) y(y)/d y = -4y^-5 = (-4/y^5) for y > 0.

Therefore, the PDF of Y is:

f y(y) =

{-4/y^5 y > 0

{0 otherwise

This is the final answer.

To know more about probability density function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30070005#

#SPJ11

Answer: 24.2

Step-by-step explanation: its right

The solution of the subtraction is 639.

When subtracting 748 from 109, we notice that 748 is a much larger number than 109. This suggests that we will not be able to subtract 748 from 109 entirely, resulting in a negative answer. However, we can still proceed with finding out how many times 748 fits into 109.

To find out how many times 748 fits into 109, we perform a division operation. Divide 109 by 748, and you will get the quotient (whole number) and remainder.

109 ÷ 748 = Quotient (0) + Remainder (109)

In this case, the quotient is 0, and the remainder is 109. The quotient of 0 suggests that 748 does not fit into 109 even once without going into negative values. However, the remainder of 109 is crucial information that tells us the remaining amount after performing the subtraction operation.

Since 748 does not fit into 109 without resulting in negative numbers, we cannot find a straightforward answer to the subtraction problem. However, if we wanted to find the difference between the two numbers, we could express it as:

109 - 748 = -639

Here, the negative sign indicates that the result is negative. In this context, we can interpret the subtraction as "109 is 639 less than 748." So, while we cannot subtract 748 from 109 directly, we can determine the relative difference between the two numbers.

To know more about subtract here

https://brainly.com/question/13619104

#SPJ4

David is a salesman for a local Ford dealership. He is paid a percentage of the profit the dealership makes on each car. If the profit is under $800, the commission is 25%.

If the profit is at least $800 and less than $1,000, the commission rate is 27.5% of the profit. If the profit is $1,000 or more, the rate is 30% of the profit.

Let's find the difference between the commission paid if David sells a car for a $1,000 profit and the commission paid if he sells a car for a $799 profit. We'll begin by finding the commission paid if David sells a car for a $1,000 profit.Commission paid on a $1,000 profit=.30(1,000)=300

Therefore, if David sells a car for a $1,000 profit, his commission is $300. Let's move on to finding the commission paid if he sells a car for a $799 profit. Commission paid on a $799 profit=.25(799)=199.75Therefore, if David sells a car for a $799 profit, his commission is $199.75.The difference between these commissions is:$300-$199.75=$100.25

Therefore, the difference between the commission paid if David sells a car for a $1,000 profit and the commission paid if he sells a car for a $799 profit is $100.25.

To know more about percentage visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ11

Yes, Yt can be rewritten as Yt = et + et-1 + ... + e1. The mean function of Yt is E(Yt) = E(et + et-1 + ... + e1) = 0. The variance function for Yt is Var(Yt) = tσe^2.

(a) Yes, Yt can be rewritten as Yt = et + et-1 + ... + e1.

We can see this by induction. For t = 1, we have Y1 = e1. Assume that the result holds for some k, i.e., Yk = ek + ek-1 + ... + e1. Then, for k+1, we have:

Yk+1 = Yk + ek+1

= ek + ek-1 + ... + e1 + ek+1

= ek + ek-1 + ... + e1 + ek+1 + 0

Thus, the result holds for all t.

(b) The mean function of Yt is E(Yt) = E(et + et-1 + ... + e1) = 0.

Since the expected value of each et is 0, the expected value of Yt is also 0.

(c) The variance function for Yt is Var(Yt) = tσe^2.

Using the result from part (a), we can write:

Yt = et + et-1 + ... + e1

Taking the variance of both sides, we get:

Var(Yt) = Var(et + et-1 + ... + e1)

= Var(et) + Var(et-1) + ... + Var(e1)

= tσe^2

(d) The autocovariance function for Yt is γ(t,s) = min(t,s)σe^2.

Using the result from part (a), we can write:

Yt = et + et-1 + ... + e1

Then, for s < t, we have:

YtYs = (et + et-1 + ... + es+1 + es)(es + es-1 + ... + e1)

Expanding the product and taking the expected value, we get:

E(YtYs) = E(etes + et-1es + ... + es+1es + es^2 + eses-1 + ... + es e1)

= E(etes) + E(et-1es) + ... + E(es+1es) + E(es^2) + E(eses-1) + ... + E(es e1)

= min(t,s)σe^2

For s > t, we can use the symmetry of the autocovariance function to get:

γ(t,s) = γ(s,t) = min(s,t)σe^2

(e) No, Yt is not stationary.

From part (b), we know that E(Yt) = 0 for all t. From part (c), we know that Var(Yt) = tσe^2, which depends on t. Therefore, Yt cannot be stationary.

Learn more about variance here

https://brainly.com/question/15858152

#SPJ11