Answer: In paragraphs, a topic sentence often identifies the main claim or idea of the paragraph. This is usually the first sentence, but not always.
Explanation:
Look for evidence in the text. Understand what your article is about. You have to know what you're reading about.
Be able to identify any fallacies and rhetoric styles the writer uses. Understand the writer's purpose. You must know what the writer's main intent is, in order to find the claim.
Which detail from a story is most clearly a symbol?
A. A comparison an author makes between a car and a fighter jet to
show the car's speed
B. A character who always shows up late because of bad luck,
despite his best efforts
C. A designer phone that stands for a character's total dependence
on technology
O D. A powerful program that hackers sabotage one another to obtain
Answer:
C. A designer phone that stands for a character's total dependence
on technology
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST FOR BEST ANSWER!!!!!
What is a central idea in "The White Umbrella"?
The narrator competes with another music student to determine who has more talent.
The narrator feels fortunate to receive a gift from her music teacher.
The narrator feels guilty for wishing her music teacher was her mother.
The narrator tries to convince her sister to be more accepting of their mother.
Answer:
the answer c
Explanation:
Answer:
The narrator feels guilty for wishing her music teacher was her mother.
Explanation:
I took the quiz, and got this one correct. Here's proof:
do we rely on technology to much?
Answer:
Today, individuals in particular and society in general are enormously dependent on technology. That is to say, the human being has generated a dependency on all the technological tools available, in such a way that if they were missing, their daily organization would be altered in a transcendent way: today it is practically impossible to carry out a normal life without a car, internet or cell phone. Even minor issues are also demonstrative: practically nobody can explore an unknown place without a GPS, and even almost nobody makes their purchases without having first checked the Amazon or Alibaba web pages to compare prices before going to the store. In this way, it is evident how technology has broken into our lives, making us largely dependent on its advances.
What does the suffix -ine mean in the word heroine?
The silent movie heroine faced danger from an evil villain
female
young
great
many
Ans
Female
Explanation:
The suffix -ine is used for females and hero is used for males.
How will kids of the future go to school—in classrooms or online? What are the benefits of each option?
Answer: It has been tradition for years and years children go to school in a classroom. However with this pandemic it has changed. I believe children will still go to school in the future because that is what people have always done and that is the way people want to be done. If they do not they choose online school and are not forced into it. Perks of school in a classroom you are around people your teachers are live in front of you. Questions are more easily asked and the point may get across quicker in person than through a screen. In a classroom their is more a sense of community.
Online school can do done at any time. You have lots of time to go around your busy schedule no can work around all your activities. Online school means you can get all your work done in a day or get it done in increments. Sometimes you learn at your own pace. You feel free to ask questions because through email none of your classmates know you are talking to your teacher.
Explanation:
Hope that helps
Which sentence correctly uses an adverbial phrase?
O A. Dr. Hernandez left with a spring in his step.
B. Dr. Hernandez left springs in his steps.
C. Dr. Hernandez had a spring in his step.
D. Dr. Hernandez, showing a spring in his step, left.
Answer:
A. Dr. Hernandez left with a spring in his step.
Explanation:
An adverbial phrase is known to be a group of words which actually function as an adverb. It helps to modify verbs, adverbs, adjectives, sentences, etc.
Option A is an adverbial phrase because it tells about the manner in which Dr. Hernandez left. It is an adverbial phrase of manner.
Adverbial phrase of manner actually states how something is done or carried out.
Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
ehehheehhe
In "Saving Tobe," why does Lazzaro keep shouting out to Serafin?
Lazzaro thinks Serafin is foolish for going into the river to save Tobe.
Lazzaro knows Serafin is struggling and is encouraging him to not give up.
Lazzaro is trying to direct Serafin to where to find Tobe in the water.
Lazzaro is annoyed with Serafin because he cannot overpower the sweeping current.
In "Saving Tobe," the Lazzaro keep shouting out to Serafin because :
B) Lazzaro knows Serafin is struggling and is encouraging him to not give up.
"Saving Tobe "
In "Saving Tobe," the Lazzaro keep shouting out to Serafin because Lazzaro knows Serafin is struggling and is encouraging him to not give up.Lazzaro tried motivating him to not give up .Thus, the correct answer is B.
Learn more about "Saving Tobe ":
https://brainly.com/question/20626493?referrer=searchResults
Explain why cross-referencing a topic is a good idea when conducting research.
because it allows a student to explore different points of view and come up with an angle
because it allows students to research different kinds of data bases and see what the rest of the publishing world thinks
because narrowing a topic is difficult and students always need to do more research
because narrowing a topic is one of the primary skills that all students must master before writing a paper
Answer: because it allows a student to explore different points of view and come up with an angle
Explanation:
Cross referencing simply has to do with the checking of several books or documents in order to find related Information to a particular topic.
It is good idea when conducting research because it allows a student to explore different points of view and come up with an angle
Select the correctly punctuated sentence. A. Tevon missed too many days of class, so he will have to withdraw for the semester. B. Tevon missed too many days of class so, he will have to withdraw for the semester. C. Tevon missed too many days of class so he will have to withdraw for the semester.
Answer:
A) Comma after class and before so
Explanation:
How Shakespeare talks about love in sonnet 18 ?
Answer:
Sonnet 18 is part of a series of sonnets in which William Shakespeare refers to love making comparisons with tangible issues in the world, in this case, with summer: he refers to his love, presumably also a man, comparing him with summer, making reference to the beauty of said season and its likeness to his loved one, even considering him as more beautiful than the season itself, since the latter is temporary, while the beauty of his loved one is permanent and immutable.
any help with #4 please!!
B- Write a report, 100-120 words, to describe the daily routine of someone you know who has an unusual job. Include a title, a topic sentence, details and a concluding sentence.
You may include the following:
- What the job is, where the job is, what he/she does (in details)
- daily routines
-describe the job and impression towards it.
(5 نقطة)
Answer:
Explanation:
What topic?
A report of 100-120 words to describe the daily routine of someone you know who has an unusual job would be the following:
Title: The different job of a pet food testerParagraph 1 (with topic sentence): One of my father's good friends from high school has the most unusual job I have ever seen: He is a pet food tester. Originally a food technician, he was hired by a pet food manufacturer to make sure the quality of their product was top notch.Paragraph 2 (with description, routine, and details): The main part of his job, and the one that consumes most of his time daily, is thinking of ideas for new food products, making sure that the nutritional value of the food is up to par, and writing reports. He does have to taste the food when a new product is being developed, but he always spits it out. If the flavor is bad to human taste buds, it will most likely be bad for pets too.Paragraph 3 (with impression of the job): Even though his job can be considered strange by most people's standards, I believe it is important to have someone do what he does. We care about pets as if they were family members. We want the best for them and we want their food to be tasty and nutritional.- To write a report such as the one above, first do some researching about the job you wish to talk about.
- You can talk to the person you are writing about or, in case that is not possible, you can look up job descriptions online.
- If you cannot come up with a title right off the bat, write the report first and then choose a title that relates to the main idea.
- Include: who the person is, what the job is, and what the person has to do when performing that job.
- Finally, add your impression of the job at the end, that is, your opinion or perspective about it.
Learn more about the topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/22944769
PLEASE HELP NOW PLEASE!! GIVING THE BRAINLIEST!!
Read the sentence.
After reading several of her poems, the distinguished poet answered all our questions with grace and good humor.
Which two words are closest in meaning and tone to the word distinguished in the sentence?
1. approved
2. glorious
3. notable
4. respected
5. unforgettable
Answer:
I'd say Notable and Unforgettable might be wrong tho
The Two words closest to the meaning are glorious and respected.
What is the meaning of Grace?Grace refers to the personality of being respectful, dignified and polite. For example Shweta handles are clients with the tact and grace.
The closest meaning to the above sentence is glorious which means worthy of fame and glory. For example Raman has a glorious career.
The second word that suites to the meaning of sentence is respected. Thus the correct option is (2) and (4).
Learn more about humor here:
https://brainly.com/question/11513133
#SPJ2
18
Select the correct answer.
Which sentence is an oxymoron?
OA
To have peace, we must go to war.
ОВ. A glass can be viewed as either half full or half empty.
The lawyer was deceptively honest with his clients.
OD Spies do not dress like spies.
O E. Though the lab was messy, there was a method to his madness.
Reset
Next
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Peace and war oppose each other, and to say one is needed for the other is oxymoronic
Which revision is needed to correct the following sentence?
The rare butterflies use their long delicate antennae to sniff the sweet
spring flowers.
O A. Add a comma after the word delicate.
O B. Add a comma after the word rare.
O C. Add a comma after the word long.
D. Add a comma after the word sweet.
Answer:
C. Add a comma after the word long.
Explanation:
A comma shouldn't separate an adjective from the noun it modifies. This is why options A and B are incorrect.
When it comes to multiple adjectives, sometimes, a comma should be placed between them, and sometimes it shouldn't. This depends on what these adjectives are like. We will define two types of adjectives:
Coordinate adjectives. They separately modify the noun that follows. A comma should be placed between them.Cumulative adjectives. They don’t separately modify the noun that follows. Instead, the adjective right before the noun pairs with the noun, and then the adjective before them modifies that entire phrase. A comma shouldn't be placed between cumulative adjectives.If you're unsure if adjectives are coordinate or cumulative, you can try placing the conjunction and between them. If the phrase still makes sense, you have coordinate adjectives and should place a comma between them.
Long and delicate antennae sounds right. This is how we know that long and delicate are coordinate adjectives and that a comma should be placed between them.
Sweet and spring flowers doesn't sound right. This is how we know that option D is incorrect.
This is why option C is the correct one.
Which of the following choices used in a literary work would demonstrate the use of allusion?
Answer:
answer is" a mention of a passage from a literary work"
Julie held up six different outfits in front of the mirror and pondered which would go best with her navy blue shoes, pastel eye shadow and the diamond earrings she’d already procured from her overflowing vanity. After ninety minutes of mixing and matching, and cell-phoning her sister three times for advice, Julie finally made up her mind. She’d give the navy blue skirt and white sweater a try, hoping Trent would love it.
Paragraph A demonstrates which type of characterization? DIRECT or INDIRECT?
Answer:
Indirect
Explanation:
it doesn't tell you outright the kind of person she is but you can tell that she really cares about other people's opinions.
Read the excerpt from the blind men and an elephant. Not seeing is believing
If somebody knows this thanks
Answer:
i belive its the 1st answer please tell me if im wrong (:
Explanation:
Based on the use of technology, the development of characters, and the main message of the stories ____________________________ is a better work of science fiction.
Explanation:
Based on the use of technology, the development of characters, and the main message of the stories dealing with the impact of imagined innovations in science or technology, often in a futuristic setting is a better work of science fiction.
The common characteristics of a science friction movie include:
Time travel.
Teleportation.
Mind control, telepathy, and telekinesis.
Aliens, extraterrestrial lifeforms, and mutants.
Space travel and exploration.
Interplanetary warfare.
Parallel universes.
Fictional worlds.
in what point of view was the book Night written
Answer:
The book Night is written in first person
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
interpret: “with regard to excellence, it is not enough to know, but we must try to have and use it” - Aristotle
We must work hard to learn new things so that we can benefit humanity. Knowledge that is not applied to the betterment of humanity is meaningless. Then, excellence is knowing and applying that knowledge to advance human flourishing.
Who was Aristotle?In ancient Greece's Classical era, Aristotle was a polymath and philosopher. He was the creator of the Peripatetic school of philosophy within the Lyceum and the larger
Aristotelian tradition, having been taught by Plato. His publications cover a wide range of topics, including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, aesthetics, ethics, poetry, theater, music, psychology, rhetoric, linguistics, economics, politics, meteorology, geology, and government. Aristotle offered a sophisticated synthesis of the numerous philosophical systems that had been practiced before him.
The West gained its intellectual vocabulary, as well as its problems and research methodologies, primarily from his lectures. His theory as a result has had a particularly significant impact on practically all areas of Western knowledge, and it is still a topic of debate in modern philosophy.
Learn more about Aristotle, from:
brainly.com/question/5399979
#SPJ2
Select the linking verb and the predicate noun or predicate adjective.
Answer:
became metropolis
Explanation:
Segment one exam part b
PLS HELP ASAP. What is the central idea in this passage? O Invisible ink was a good choice when writing in code Giving up information could be a disaster for either side. O George Washington could have done a better job managing his spies. * The British used horseback riders to deliver messages
Answer: Giving up information could be a disaster for either side.
Explanation:
The central idea in a story or passage is the main point of the passage or story that the author wants to communicate. The central idea is referred to as what the passge is about.
In this case, the central idea of the passage is that "Giving up information could be a disaster for either side".
AnswerB on EDG:
Explanation:
james often feels underappreciated at work and feels as though his quality of work on projects is unrecognized
similarities between peer teaching and micro teaching
Read the following excerpts from two speeches given by Franklin D.
Roosevelt at the onset of America's entrance into World War II in 1941. The
first one was given to Congress and the second one was a radio address to
the nation:
1. With confidence in our armed forces, with the
unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the
inevitable triumph - so help us God.
2. We are now in the midst of
a war, not for conquest, not
for vengeance, but for a world in which this nation, and all
that this nation represents, will be safe for our children.
Which most accurately describes a major difference in the emphasis between
the two speeches?
A. Both speeches use hyperbole to inflate the need for war with
Japan.
B. Unlike Speech #1, Speech #2 stirs up fear to muster support.
O c. Unlike Speech #2, Speech #1 relies on FDR's integrity to persuade
Americans
D. Unlike speech #2 speech #1 promises perseverance to gain victory
Answer:
D. Unlike Speech #2, Speech #1 promises perseverance to gain victory.
Statement D most accurately describes a major difference in the emphasis between the two speeches.
What is speech?Speech is a human vocal communication using language. Each language uses a phonetic combinations of vowels and consonant sounds that form the sound of its words , and using those words in their semantic character as words in the language according to the syntactic constraints that govern lexical words' function in a sentence. In speaking, speakers perform many different intentional speech acts, e.g., informing, declaring, asking, persuading, directing, and can use enunciation, intonation, degrees of loudness, tempo, and other non-representational or paralinguistic aspects of vocalization to convey meaning.
In the speech, speakers also unintentionally communicate many aspects of their social position such as , age, place of origin (through accent), physical states (alertness and sleepiness, vigor or weakness, health or illness), psychological states (emotions or moods), physico-psychological states, education or experience, and the like.
Learn more about speech,here:
https://brainly.com/question/17020206
#SPJ7
This is quite lengthy but i would really appreciate the help!
Answer: Farris Qunibi WRC 1013 Riske October 4, 2008 Analytical Response to Barbara Kingsolver’s “Stone Soup” Barbara Kingsolver’s “Stone Soup” is a personal response to society’s view of the “broken” family. Kingsolver believes that society has for too long criticized divorce, remarriage, single parenthood, gay parents, and blended families, and that alternative families deserve equal standing in our society .In response to reading Kingsolver’s essay, this paper will serve to show which parts of “Stone Soup” are supported by outside evidence and which are not. “Stone Soup” is a personal reaction by Barbara Kingsolver that expresses the author’s feelings in response to society’s negative view and it’s holding of contempt of divorced, remarried, single parenthood, and gay parents. The author herself is a divorced parent and feels outraged at the notion that her family, according to society, is classified as “broken” or “failed” (Kingsolver 7).She begins her essay with an anecdote of a child scoring a winning goal during a soccer game; the child looking at the bleachers, where he is praised by his mother and her friends – Kingsolver included, his brother, his father and stepmother, a stepbrother and stepsister, and a grandparent. Kingsolver follows the anecdote with a threat: “I dare anybody to call this a broken home” (Kingsolver 1). This statement clearly exposes her feelings of the structure of family to the reader, and shows her limited tolerance for critical and judging views of the “finished” family. Furthermore, Kingsolver is critical at the fact that our culture is quick to diagnoses “consequent reshaping of families,” as “failing” (Kingsolver 16). Kingsolver also reveals to the reader her experience of divorce and the affect it had on her and her daughter, admitting to the reader her arrogant view of divorce prior to experiencing it herself and describing her prior beliefs as, “ignorance” (Kingsolver 9). Kingsolver’s essay is filled with personal opinions and shows little or no evidence to support her arguments. In order to fully understand Kingsolver’s arguments presented in “Stone Soup,” readers must be exposed to external qualified sources that examine the arguments of the author by supporting Kingsolver’s arguments, or suggesting an alternative view. For example, Kingsolver defends the notion that families of nontraditional arrangements do not need to be examined, ridiculed or treated differently with pity or tolerance as traditionally married families when she says, “Arguing about whether nontraditional families deserve pity or tolerance is a little like the medieval debate about left-handedness as a mark of the devil” (Kingsolver 16). By this statement, the author clearly expresses her belief that nontraditional families are just as successful in their roles as traditional or married families, though evidence gathered has rejected Kingsolver’s argument. In an article by Naomi Gerstel and Natalia Sarkisian, the authors present the benefits of marriage as opposed to divorced or single parenthood families. Naomi Gerstel writes that, “advocates [of marriage] such as David Popenoe and Linda Waite assert that marriage is good for one’s pocketbook, health, happiness, sex life, and kids. Both men and women who are married tend to have higher incomes, more wealth, better health, and more property than those who are not. ” The article goes on to describe the negative impacts of divorce and nontraditional families by introducing National Census statistics of relationships between married parents and their children compared with relationships between divorced or separated parents and children of that divorce. Also, in an article titled “Children of Divorce: Stories of Loss and Growth” by John H. Harvey and Mark A. Fine, the article reads, “compared with children from first-married families, children of divorced parents have been found to have lower income and educational attainment, to marry at younger ages, and to be more likely to cohabit prior to marriage (Furstenberg & Teitler, 1994). These examples, along with others that will be presented later in this essay are strong refusals of Kingsolver’s argument that families of divorce should be given the same respect and treatment of married families.
i hope this helps, took a while for me to do :D
what additional piece of evident in the text supports the inference complete the chart
Answer:
a
Explanation: