Answer:
It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
just bc
What’s the answer to this question?
Answer:
King Tut is important because he was the best ruler of Ancient Egypt
Explanation:
So the answer is the fact of that king Tut is important for he was the best ruler so it's the 4th one on your checkboxes
Answer:
The tomb of King Tutankhamen is one of the most famous because of its well-known discovery by Howard Carter, a British archaeologist. The tomb was important because it let archaeologists record what an Egyptian king’s tomb looked like and learn more about ancient Egypt.
Explanation:
I hope this helped. I know it's not one of the answers but it should help a little bit.
can someone answer plss
Answer: What are we supposed to answer?
Explanation:
Did the end of the war and of slavery lead to a peace based on liberty and justice for all was Reconstruction just the first stage in a long and difficult struggle for equal rights for all Americans?
pls help
Should the Chicago 7 have been put on trial for inciting riots or did they have the right to protest? Explain.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
The trial of the Chicago 7, also known as the Chicago Conspiracy Trial, was a highly controversial event that took place in the aftermath of the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
From a legal perspective, the question of whether the Chicago 7 had the right to protest or should be held accountable for inciting riots depends on the interpretation of the law and the specific circumstances surrounding the events. The defendants argued that they were exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly by organizing peaceful protests against the Vietnam War and perceived injustices. They claimed that they did not directly incite violence but rather expressed their dissent through peaceful means.
On the other hand, the prosecution argued that the defendants conspired to incite violence and disrupt the convention, leading to the riots that occurred. They contended that their actions went beyond protected free speech and assembly and crossed into criminal conduct.
The trial itself was marked by political tensions, clashes between the defendants and the judge, and controversies surrounding the handling of evidence and witnesses. Eventually, the defendants were convicted of some charges, but their convictions were later overturned on appeal.
From a broader perspective, the trial and the events surrounding it sparked debates about the limits of free speech, the role of protests in a democratic society, and the balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding civil liberties. Different viewpoints exist on whether the charges and the subsequent trial were justified or if they infringed upon the defendants' rights to protest.
Ultimately, opinions on this matter may vary depending on one's perspective and interpretation of the events and legal principles involved. Some may argue that the defendants had the right to protest peacefully and that their charges were politically motivated, while others may contend that inciting riots is a legitimate concern and should be addressed through legal means.
To know more about protest , here
https://brainly.com/question/19244187
#SPJ2
why is nancy pelosi election to speaker of the house so significant
Answer:
From what I can gather I know that her election was so important because of her slim chance she had on being reelected as "Speaker of House".
Hope this helps lol
Explanation:
The Carlisle Indian School was one of many boarding schools built as part of the push for Americanization in
the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Why were schools such as this started?
Answer:
To force american indian to give up their native cultures and adopt new traditions
Explanation:
What made the Roman Republic and Empire powerful?
What was the significance of the Homestead Act of 1862?
A. It led to the California gold rush and set the territory on the path to
statehood.
B. It encouraged Americans to settle and develop the land west of
the Mississippi River.
C. It established vast new American Indian reservations that
promoted assimilation.
D. It promoted the development of southern-style plantations
throughout the West.
Answer:
The Homestead Act of 1862 was one of the most significant and enduring events in the westward expansion of the United States. By granting 160 acres of free land to claimants, it allowed nearly any man or woman a "fair chance.
Explanation:
hope this helps you!
correct answer is B; it encouraged americans to settle and develop the land west of the mississippi river.
What does
Say
about
the
attitude then
about
imperialism?
Answer:
Hope this helps
Explanation:
Years ago, Edward Crab's courses in American foreign relations—and
specifically, his interest in American empire—inspired me to explore this field, and I
am grateful to have been able to study it under his guidance. His patience, good
humor, and unfailing encouragement of me in my research and my career have been
invaluable. Chandon Brown’s suggestions and enthusiasm for this study as a
contribution to American cultural history have enriched it, as have the suggestions of
James Accord, who offered repeated close readings and valuable insights into the
British empire. This study was further strengthened by the suggestions of Kinsey
Braver, who brought his expertise in American expansion during the Middle Period to
this project. Parts of this dissertation also benefited from the comments of the
members of William and Mai's dissertation discussion group and participants at the
annual meetings of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.
The staff of William and Mary’s Swed Library—especially Sheila Brown,
Don Welsh, and Alan Zollverein—have been quite helpful.
Explain how the separation of powers was a compromise the framers reached as they were creating the constitution
Answer: In addition to separating powers among the branches, the Framers gave each branch the power to check, or stop, the actions of the other two branches in meaningful ways. For example, the president has the power to veto, or reject, laws made by Congress.
What might happen to a country where Social Darwinism is believed by everyone and put into practice?
Using complete sentences, explain how the Chinese communists were treated under the rule of Chiang Kai-shek
What was the Long March, and what were its results?
Explanation:
The Long March was indeed a revolutionary withdrawal to avoid the prosecution of the Kuomintang (KMT or Chinese Progressive Party) army conducted by the Red Army of both the People's Republic of China, the mainstay of the People ’s Liberation.
kings would grant land to lords, who would then grant it to knights and other vassals. this grant was known as
Answer:
Fief
Explanation:
I know all sorts of stuff about Feudalism, cuz I'm smart!
...Never mind, I looked it up : /
PLEASE HELP MEEE !!!!!!! How do we know racism still exist 3-5 paragraphs
Answer:
Racism still exist today in our everyday lives.
When you look at someone you most likely see a normal person but not to other people. Some people look at people and watch them because of there race or color. When a white person walks into a store no one watches them they are fine. But when a black person walks into a store a police or someone will follow them down the aisles making sure they don't steal anything. Why you may ask, there is no rhyme or reason of why they do this they do it because some black people are bad people or thieves so now all of them are because of skin tone. But why not white people? Because white people are "prettier" or they "look better" but that isn't true this year alone white people have killed more people than black people but they are still the bad ones. A little suspicious right?
Explanation:
</3 PureBeauty
Which of the sentences below would go in the "problem/concept:column of an everything-i-know chart?
A. how much money do i need to buy my books
B. i know that im going to have to take a math class next semester
C. what do i need to do before going to school
D. im not sure how many credits i need to take to graduate
Answer: D
Explanation:
Everyone doesn’t kniw how much credits they need at first
Answer:
B
Explanation:
brainliest if u answer this
Answer:
because it said we the people so they thought "okay we are people we should get equality" but they did not. Sad
Explanation:
Propaganda posters painted an unrealistic picture of war because they showed Americans as
men and women united in the war effort.
people taking part in unpatriotic activities.
only happy people, not people suffering or dying.
people taking part in antiwar activities
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I found the answer on a different site
Answer:
c
Explanation:
As a hot air balloon rises from 0 (zero) kilometers to 6 kilometers above sea level which of the following happens?
air density remains the same.
air density decreases.
air density increases.
air temperature increases.
Which group did Quanah Parker lead a band of Native American fighters from to
resist settlement of the Plains?
A Comanche
B Kiowa
C Arapaho
D to Cheyenne
Answer: A
Explanation: Took the test
a\a\a\
a
a
aa
aa
a
a
a
a
Answer: A. Comanche
Explanation: I took the test and got it right.
what did austria-hungary annex??
Answer :On October 6, 1908, the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary announces its annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, dual provinces in the Balkan region of Europe formerly under the control of the Ottoman Empire.
Explanation:
Have great day!
Why were Texans from the western and northern regions of the state against secession?
They had an economy that worked independently from enslaved labor.
They supported Edward Clark.
They refused to support Governor Sam Houston.
They had an economy heavily based on trade with other countries.
Answer: Houston rejected the actions of the Texas Secession Convention, believing it had overstepped its authority in becoming a member state of the newly formed Confederacy. He refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy and was deposed from office.
Explanation: Please make me brainliest :)
Texans from the western and northern regions of the state are against secession because they had an economy that worked independently from enslaved labor. Thus, option 'A' is the correct option.
Why did some Texans oppose secession?Galveston and Harrison's counties were opposed to secession by slaveholding former Whigs. Attitudes toward independence were impacted by local needs as well. Galveston's slaveholding Whigs frequently engaged in large business transactions with New York and English merchants. Their operations would be impacted by any interruption to the Union. Not everyone in Texas supported the war, as the close outcomes of the 1861 governor election demonstrated.
About 30% of Texans, according to historians, were Unionists. As time would show, many of these dissenters would suffer severe consequences as a result of their beliefs. The letter outlines a number of justifications for secession, including support for "sister slave-holding States," incapacity of the federal government to thwart Indian incursions, raids for slaves, and other border-crossing acts of banditry.
Learn more about Texans opposing secession, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15981113
#SPJ5
How did Sitting Bull react to the government's effort to force all natives onto a reservation
by 1876?
Answer: He fought back
Explanation:
Who is the Greek god of war?
Answer: Ares
Explanation:
Answer: Kratos
Explanation:cuz yea
2) Why didn't Lenin want Stalin to take his place in the Communist party?
Answer: stalin was too coarse
Explanation:
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing
historical sources?
A. Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
B. Determine which events could have influenced others later in
history
C. Examine historical context to better understand why an event
happened
D. Study and interpret documents, art, and other artifacts
SUBMIT
Answer:
C
Explanation: makes the most sense
What is the opposite of fundamentalism
Answer:
casual,unattached................
Written in 1848, the Delclaration of sentiments was a list of goals for the women’s rights movement. There was one goal, however, that was heavily debated: women’s right to vote. Some women thought the entire women’s movement would lose support if they included the goal of voting rights. But in the end the right to vote became one of the most important issues in the woman’s right movement.
Interpretation 1- woman’s right to vote should have been included in the declaration of sentiments because it was important for women to become more politically
Active in order to push for change.
Interpretation 2- The declaration of sentiments should not have included women’s rights to vote because the public didn’t support the idea.
Which statement best compares the two interpretations of the declaration of sentiments?
A. Both interpretations agree that women’s right to vote should have been left out of the declaration of sentiments.
B. Interpretation one supports the inclusion of women’s right to vote in the declaration of sentiments while interpretation 2 opposes it.
C. Both interpretations agree that women’s right to vote should have been included in the declaration of sentiments.
D. Interpretation one to poses inclusion of women’s right to vote in the declaration of sentiments while interpretation 2 to supports it.
Answer:
its b i think
Explanation:
answer the answer is a
He was the friend of Jesus that brought back to life
Answer:
Saint Lazarus
Explanation:
an example of a paternalistic view?
Answer:
Paternalism is the interference with the liberty or autonomy of another person, with the intent of promoting good or preventing harm to that person. Examples of paternalism in everyday life are laws which require seat belts, wearing helmets while riding a motorcycle, and banning certain drugs
Explanation:
cons of the equal rights amendment
Answer:1. It requires a three-fourths ratification from the states to become law.
The Equal Rights Amendment was first proposed in 1923. It wouldn’t be passed as a possible amendment until 1972. Because there is a 75% requirement for ratification by the states to make an amendment to the Constitution, 38 states must agree with the proposal for it to become law. Congress set a deadline of 1982 for legislatures across the country to ratify the amendment. By the time the deadline expired, only 35 had endorsed the idea.
If Congress were to pass another version of the Equal Rights Amendment today, then that process would need to start over. There is still no guarantee that there would be enough support at the state level to approve the amendment.
2. Five states have actually rescinded their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
In the 1970s, there were five states that decided to rescind or withdraw their ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. They were Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky, and South Dakota. What is interesting about the Constitution is that it only speaks to the power of a state to ratify an amendment. It does not suggest that there is a power in place to rescind this authorization. The current precedents would suggest that it would not be possible to do so. If another state were to join the 37 who have already said yes to this idea, then it would likely create another legal showdown that would need to be settled in the Supreme Court.
It should also be noted that a federal court ruled that offering a time extension for the amendment was unconstitutional and that states could withdraw their previous support, creating a different precedent to consider. The Supreme Court only ruled that the entire point was moot because there was not a complete ratification.
3. It would not protect people who do not identify as male or female.
Because the Equal Rights Amendment was originally crafted over 40 years ago, the recent issues of gender identification would not be included in the final text after ratification in the amendment’s current form. The goal is to provide women with equal protections, which is a necessary first step. Individuals who identify as non-binary, agender, or facing androgyny choices may not receive the same protections under the law. There is also the possibility that transgender individuals who complete their transition may not qualify because of their “change” from one gender to another.
4. The amendment could take away some of the benefits that women enjoy.
Phyllis Schalfly does not apologize for her opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. Even in 2007, when writing a piece for the Los Angeles Times, she said that the process of granting equality should not involve taking away the privileges that women have fought so hard to earn in the first place.
“The amendment would require women to be drafted into military combat any time men were conscripted,” she wrote. “[It] would abolish the presumption that the husband should support his wife and take away Social Security benefits for wives and widows. It would also give federal courts and the federal government enormous new powers to reinterpret every law that makes a distinction based on gender, such as those related to marriage, divorce, and alimony.”
5. It could create fewer barriers to prematurely ending human life potentiality.
Whether you support the idea of abortion, are against it, or find yourself somewhere in the middle, this medical procedure does create an ending to that human life potentiality. There are times when it may be medically necessary. Some may pursue such an action because of their personal preferences or needs. When looking at how the ERA would address this issue, there is an excellent chance based on previous state-based rulings that it would expand opportunities where permitted. Just as this option was listed as a potential advantage, it could also be a potential disadvantage depending on what your perspective happens to be.
A Final Thought on the Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment
It is easy to get bogged down in the semantics of an argument about a specific piece of legislation, forgetting that we are all basically on the same side. Well over 95% of the U.S. population supports the idea of ensuring that women receive the same rights as women guaranteed in the structure of our government. How we decide to make that happen is our debate.
Some suggest that the 14th Amendment does enough, while others say it is not enough. There are benefits to the ERA that would be helpful, but it could also provide a lot of uncertainty. Even the chance to pass it now is uncertain since the deadline given to it is in the resolution language that proposes the text instead of the amendment itself.
Explanation: source - https://connectusfund.org/7-strongest-pros-and-cons-of-the-equal-rights-amendment
Answer:
It allowed everybody to vote and have the same rights no matter the color of your skin or gender
Explanation:
hope thta helped