Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Achaemenid Persian Empire, kept his subjects loyal by implementing several policies that ensured stability, prosperity and religious tolerance. Some of these include:
Tolerance of different religions: Cyrus allowed local communities to continue practicing their own religions, which helped to create a sense of cultural diversity and tolerance within the empire.
Administration of justice: Cyrus established a system of government that was known for its fairness and impartiality, which helped to maintain social order and reduce grievances.
Treatment of conquered peoples: Cyrus treated the peoples of conquered territories with respect, allowing them to continue their way of life and even promoting some of their leaders to positions of authority within the empire.
Promotion of commerce: Cyrus encouraged trade and commerce, which created prosperity for the empire and helped to bind together its diverse peoples.
These policies, along with Cyrus' personal charisma and military prowess, helped to foster a sense of loyalty among his subjects and contributed to the stability and longevity of the Persian Empire.
The Reformation forever changed religion. What
happened during this time that caused the
change?
The Church’s practice of selling indulgences was also challenged, and the practice was abolished. This period also saw the emergence of new religious orders, such as the Jesuits. Ultimately, the Reformation resulted in a shift in the power dynamics of Christianity, with the Church no longer having a monopoly on religious truth.
What is Reformation?Generally, The Reformation was a period of religious, political, and social upheaval that began in the 16th century. It began when Martin Luther published his 95 Theses in 1517, which expressed his disagreements with certain practices of the Catholic Church.
This sparked a series of events that ultimately resulted in the proliferation of Protestantism, a new branch of Christianity. During this period, the Church’s authority was challenged, resulting in the emergence of new ideas and changes in religious practice.
The Church’s control over access to the Bible was challenged, and the Bible was made available to the general public in vernacular languages. This allowed people to study and interpret scripture for themselves, rather than relying on the Church’s interpretation.
Read more about Reformation
https://brainly.com/question/18010893
#SPJ1
Which two heroes were nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents?
Horus and Atalanta
Atalanta and Semiramis
Theseus and Odysseus
Odysseus and Rama
The two heroes that were nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents is: D. Odysseus and Rama.
What is Odysseus and Rama?
Odysseus and Rama were both nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents.
Odysseus was a legendary hero in Greek mythology and the protagonist of Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey." He was said to have been raised by the priestess of the goddess Athena after being abandoned by his parents.
Rama was a prince and hero in Hindu mythology who was said to have been nursed by animals after his father abandoned him in the forest. The story of Rama is told in the Hindu epic "Ramayana."
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about Odysseus and Rama here:https://brainly.com/question/14927496
#SPJ1
10. Why did most white people support Manifest Destiny?
Answer:
Manifest Destiny was the idea that White Americans were divinely ordained to settle the entire continent of North America. The ideology of Manifest Destiny inspired a variety of measures designed to remove or destroy the native population.
What did the United States have that led to the Second Industrial Revolution?
Answer: the things that the united states had that led to the second industrial revolution was that they had natural resources, abundant labor supply, strong government policy, new sources of power, railroads and American inventors and inventions.
Explanation: please give brainliest.
How did the British try to end the violence in Palestine in 1939? Did it work?
The situation in Palestine in the 1930s was marked by growing tensions and violence between Jews and Arabs. The increased immigration of Jews to Palestine, coupled with their efforts to establish a national home, had led to growing Arab nationalist sentiment and resentment towards the British, who were seen as favoring the Jews.
In response to these growing tensions, the British government attempted to find a solution to the conflict in Palestine by implementing the MacDonald White Paper in 1939. The White Paper was a policy statement that aimed to address the escalating tensions between Jews and Arabs in Palestine and to find a solution to the ongoing conflict.
The key provisions of the White Paper included limiting Jewish immigration to Palestine to 75,000 over a five-year period, restricting the purchase of land by Jews, and establishing a unified Palestinian state with Arab majority rule within 10 years. The British hoped that these measures would appease Arab nationalist sentiment and reduce tensions between Jews and Arabs in Palestine.
However, the White Paper was met with opposition from both Jews and Arabs. Jewish groups saw the restrictions on immigration and land purchase as a betrayal of the Balfour Declaration, which had promised support for a Jewish national home in Palestine. The Jewish Agency, which represented the interests of the Jewish community in Palestine, rejected the White Paper and called for increased immigration and land purchase. Arab groups, on the other hand, saw the proposed Jewish immigration quotas as too lenient and demanded complete independence from British rule.
The implementation of the White Paper did not bring an end to the violence in Palestine. In fact, the restrictions on immigration and land purchase only increased tensions and led to increased violence between Jews and Arabs. Jewish underground organizations, such as the Irgun and the Stern Gang, carried out acts of terrorism against British and Arab targets, while Arab nationalist groups, such as the Arab Higher Committee, launched a series of violent uprisings against British rule.
The situation in Palestine became increasingly volatile and was further complicated by the outbreak of World War II, which made it difficult for the British to maintain control over the region. The increasing violence and instability in Palestine led to growing international concern and criticism of British policy in the region.
In conclusion, the British attempted to end the violence in Palestine in 1939 by implementing the MacDonald White Paper. However, the policy was met with opposition from both Jews and Arabs, and the restrictions on immigration and land purchase only increased tensions and led to increased violence. The White Paper failed to bring an end to the conflict in Palestine, and the situation in the region continued to be marked by growing tensions, violence, and instability. The conflict in Palestine remains one of the most complex and controversial issues in the modern world, and its resolution continues to elude efforts to this day
The boundaries of the market have been repeatedly drawn and redrawn through deliberate political decisions? True or False
The boundaries of the market have been repeatedly drawn and redrawn through deliberate political decisions is a true statment.
What is a market?A market is made up of various structures, organizations, procedures, and processes that allow people to exchange goods and services. The majority of marketplaces rely on merchants providing their products or services to purchasers in exchange for payment.
Deliberation is suited for societal concerns because it produces social fundamentals and values to guide judgment calls by seeking to gain to adopt a broad perspective.
This was to be taken with the decision that was taken and the policies will affect the way the market or the economy works.
Learn more about the market, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17284274
#SPJ1
Name and explain two compromises between the North and South prior to the Civil War. Use details to describe each compromise.
Answer:
The three major compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the Electoral College. These three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.
Explanation:
pls, tell me if wrong have a good day/night<3
and you can choose the two out of the three
You overhear someone say *Well, the Europeans that settled the United States in the Colonial Era were all of equal status and wealth." What would you say to prove them wrong? Use at least one piece of data from the chart to really prove your point.
I would say that the statement is not accurate and can be proven wrong by looking at historical records and data. For example, the chart on "Distribution of Wealth in the American Colonies in 1774" shows that a small percentage of the population controlled a disproportionate amount of wealth. The top 10% of the population controlled about 50% of the wealth, while the bottom 50% controlled only about 10%. This data clearly demonstrates that there was a significant wealth disparity among the European settlers in the American colonies, with a small group of wealthy individuals and a large group of less wealthy individuals. This disproves the idea that all European settlers in the Colonial Era were of equal status and wealth.
please someone help fast
The colonial region with their main part of economy as follows:
New england colonies = manufacturingMiddle coolonies = slaves, plantation and cropsChesapeake colonies = slaves, plantation and cropsSouthern colonies = slaves, plantation and cropsThe economy of the Chesapeake region was dependent solely on tobacco production. This increased the colonies in the South's need for slave labor. Additionally, the cultivation of tobacco required a constant supply of new land due to the soil's nutrient depletion.
An agrarian economy existed in the Southern Colonies. Although many colonists owned sizable estates that produced lucrative crops like rice and tobacco, others lived on modest family farms. On plantations, slave labor was prevalent.
The New England colonies relied on fishing, logging, and subsistence farming because their rocky terrain was unsuitable for plantation farming. Along with agricultural and maritime ships, the Middle Colonies had diversified economies. Shipbuilding craftsmen were available in New England.
Learn more about colonial region at brainly.com/question/24807786
#SPJ1
The only source of revenue for the Chesapeake region's economy was tobacco farming.
What was the main part of Economy ?The colonies in the South needed more slave labour as a result. Due to the soil's nutrient depletion, tobacco growing also required a steady supply of new land.
The Southern Colonies had an agrarian economy. Others lived on tiny family farms, despite the fact that many colonists possessed huge estates that produced rich commodities like rice and tobacco. There was a lot of slave labour on plantations.
Hence
New england colonies = manufacturing
Middle coolonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Chesapeake colonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Southern colonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Learn more about Economy here
https://brainly.com/question/14423103
SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT characteristic of Neanderthals?
A. Larger brain size
B. Caring for the sick
C. Living in small huts
D. Burial of dead
The one that is NOT characteristic of Neanderthals is option C. Living in small huts
What are Neanderthals?Neanderthals were a group of archaic humans who lived in Eurasia until around 40,000 years ago. They were distinct from later hominin species like Homo sapiens, and were generally distinguishable by their large cranial size and strongly built bodies.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that the correct answer is option C. living in small huts because they are no longer living.
learn more about Neanderthals: https://brainly.com/question/27368160
#SPJ1
Assessment Of The Roles And Challenges Of The Sub-district Structures
In Ghana's Local Governance System
Answer:
Explanation:
In Ghana's local governance system, sub-district structures play an important role in implementing policies and programs at the grassroots level. Some of their key responsibilities include:
Delivering basic social services such as education, health, and sanitation.Mobilizing and empowering communities to participate in local development.Facilitating communication between communities and higher levels of government.Ensuring the effective implementation of laws and regulations.However, the sub-district structures face several challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities, including:
Lack of adequate funding and resources.Weak capacities and limited technical skills among staff.Political interference and limited autonomy.Limited participation and engagement of marginalized groups.Inadequate infrastructure and facilities.To address these challenges, it is recommended that the sub-district structures be provided with adequate resources, capacity-building opportunities, and greater autonomy to effectively carry out their responsibilities. Additionally, efforts should be made to increase participation and engagement of marginalized groups, and to ensure that sub-district structures operate in a transparent and accountable manner.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for my assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
The Treaty of Hidalgo was a what?
Of the U.S.-Mexican War
Answer:
the treaty to end the US vs Mexico war.
According to the host, why did some Jews believe Jesus to be the messiah? Define the term messiah in your words.
The term "messiah" refers to a savior figure in Jewish tradition, believed to bring about a better world and restore the nation of Israel to its former glory.
What is messiah?According to the New Testament, some Jews in the time of Jesus believed that he was the messiah because of his teachings, miracles, and fulfilling of Old Testament prophecies. Jesus was seen as a charismatic figure who offered a message of hope and salvation, and his message resonated with many people who were looking for a savior.
It's important to note that not all Jews believed that Jesus was the messiah, and there was significant debate and disagreement among Jewish leaders and scholars of the time about his identity and teachings.
Learn more about messiah at:
https://brainly.com/question/5430127
#SPJ1
After he led a mutiny to seize control of Tehran, how did Reza shah Pahlavi try to change Iran?
how did the elements of india culture and religon spreed into southeast asia during the chola empire
The way that elements of Indian culture spread to Southeast Asia under the Chola Empire was by the conquests and trade activities of the Chola.
How did the Chola empire affect Southeast Asia ?The Chola Empire of southern India, which existed from the 9th to the 13th centuries, was one of the most powerful empires in the Indian Ocean region. Its influence extended across much of South Asia and into Southeast Asia, where Indian culture and religion became widely adopted.
This spread of Indian influence was facilitated by the Chola's military conquests and commercial activities, as well as the migration of Indian merchants and religious figures to Southeast Asian territories. The Cholas also established colonies and trading ports in Southeast Asia, which further promoted the exchange of cultural and religious ideas.
Find out more on the Chola Empire at https://brainly.com/question/25362782
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP m2
Slavery meant something slightly different for each of the three regions of colonies. Compare the New England, middle, and southern colonies and how slavery was incorporated into each society. Give one example of how they each differed, and at least one example of something they all had in common. Use details to support your response.
One example of how the regions differed is that New England was more accepting of Quakers and other religious groups who opposed slavery, whereas the Southern colonies had a much more entrenched slave-based economy.
An example of something they all had in common is that slavery was an integral part of the economy and society of each region, and all of the colonies were part of the British Empire, which meant that they were subject to the same laws and policies regarding slavery.
In New England, slavery was not widespread and was largely restricted to small pockets of cities like Boston. Slaves in New England were mostly domestic servants, and their numbers were limited by the strong presence of the Quaker movement and the limited economic demand for slave labor in the region.
In conclusion, slavery was incorporated into each of the New England, middle, and southern colonies differently, reflecting the unique economic, social, and cultural conditions of each region.
Learn more about slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ1
Slavery was incorporated differently in each of the New England, middle, and southern colonies, reflecting the region's distinct economic, social, and cultural conditions.
What differentiates slavery in New England in the middle colonies from slavery in the southern colonies?The culture of indentured servitude was one of the reasons slavery evolved differently in New England than in the middle and southern colonies. Indentured servants, a holdover from English practice, were the original standard for forced labor in New England and the middle colonies such as Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Slavery was not widespread in New England and was mostly restricted to small pockets of cities such as Boston. Slaves in New England were mostly domestic servants, and their statistics were constrained by the Quaker movement's strong presence and the region's limited economic demand for slave labor.
Learn more about New England slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/16047246
#SPJ1
why do you think the United States became a major industrial power?
Answer: The United States became a major industrial power in the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to a number of factors, including:
Natural resources: The country had abundant natural resources, including coal, iron ore, and petroleum, which were crucial for industrial development.
Technological innovations: The US experienced a number of technological innovations during this period, including the introduction of the assembly line and the widespread use of electricity. These innovations increased productivity and allowed for the mass production of goods.
Capital investment: The US had a strong capitalist system that encouraged investment in new technologies and industries, providing the necessary funding for growth.
Transportation infrastructure: The country had a well-developed transportation infrastructure, including a network of railroads and waterways, which facilitated the movement of goods and people.
Market size: The US had a large domestic market and access to overseas markets, which provided a strong demand for goods and allowed for the growth of exports.
These factors combined to create a favorable environment for industrialization and helped the US become one of the leading industrial powers in the world.
Explanation:
*Which of the following sentences from Bush's 1991 United Nations address best illustrates his vision of a new world
order?
Sentence from Bush`s 1991 United Nations That address best illustrates his vision of new world order is that the United States had a growing national debt.
What is the main idea behind the Bush Doctrine?The Bush Doctrine was Bush's idea that America could treat as an enemy any country that supports terrorists against America. It also affirms the United States' right to take precautionary measures against countries it believes pose a potential terrorist threat.
What was the vision, according to Bush?"The Vision Thing," George H. W. Bush was asked to spend some time before the 1988 presidential election pondering his plans for a future presidency.
What was the main focus of Bush's second term?During his second term, Bush secured several free trade agreements and successfully nominated John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. He tried to make radical changes to social security and immigration laws, but both efforts failed.
To learn more about President Bush visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16228626
#SPJ1
Answer: And in short, we seek a Pax Universalis built upon shared responsibility and aspirations.
Explanation:
Why were racially integrated Freedom Rides planned through the South in
1961?
Racially integrated Freedom Ride planned in South 1961 because 1961 Freedom Ride attempted to test 1960 Boynton v. Virginia Supreme Court decision that segregation of interstate transportation facilities, including bus terminals, was also unconstitutional.
What was the purpose of the 1961 Freedom Ride?In the spring of 1961, student activists from the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) launched a Freedom Ride to challenge segregation on interstate buses and bus terminals.
Why was Freedom Ride successful?The riders successfully persuaded the federal government to implement a federal law consolidating interstate travel. The Freedom Riders survive the Greyhound bus fire near Anniston, Alabama on May 14, the brutal riots in Birmingham, Alabama on May 14, and Montgomery, Alabama on May 20. I was able to. was non-violent when her life was in danger.
To learn more about Freedom Rides visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11192949
#SPJ1
40 points for a good answer
i need a 300 word paper about rent control answering these following questions.
what do you think?
is this fair?
who does it help?
what about the person who owns the rental unit?
does this make housing more available?
Answer:
Rent control is a policy that limits the amount of rent that landlords can charge for their rental units. It is intended to protect tenants from being charged excessive rent, and to make housing more affordable for those on low incomes. However, rent control has both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, rent control can help tenants by providing them with more affordable housing and protecting them from sudden and large rent increases. It can also help to stabilize neighborhoods and prevent displacement of lower-income tenants. On the other hand, rent control can reduce the incentives for landlords to maintain and improve their rental units, as they cannot charge enough rent to cover the costs of upkeep. It can also reduce the availability of rental units, as landlords may choose to convert their units to other uses or not rent them at all, leading to a shortage of available housing. Overall, rent control can help tenants in the short term, but in the long run, the costs may outweigh the benefits. It is important to consider the potential unintended consequences of rent control policies, and to ensure that they are balanced and fair to both tenants and landlords.
Explanation:
What are the arguments of those who believe that President Truman's decision to use atomic weapons to end the war was justified?
President Truman's decision are:
Bombing of Japanese citiesInvade JapanInhabited Japanese city.Bomb on an unpopulated island.Who is Harry S Truman?
Harry S Truman was born on the May 8, 1884, and the died on December 26, 1972. Her nationality was American. Her presidential period was April 12, 1945 – January 20, 1953. He was the member of the Democratic Party.
According to the Harry S Truman was the decision was the not to justify. In World War II, United States began conventional bombing of Japan was bombing of the Japanese cities. The second decision was invade Japan. The third was the inhabited Japanese city, and bomb on an unpopulated island.
As a result, the significance of the Truman's decision are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Harry S Truman, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3110190
#SPJ1
How did the ruling of Marbury v. Madison influence the power of the judicial branch?
Responses
It claimed that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.
It claimed that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.
It gave state governments power over the federal government.
It gave state governments power over the federal government.
It broke the Supreme Court away from the ideals of federalism.
It broke the Supreme Court away from the ideals of federalism.
It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a significant contribution to the "checks and balances"
What is government?The term government refers to that An organized community governed by a system or group of individuals, typically a state. The government often consists of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the case of its broad associative definition
By giving the federal courts the authority to declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution and, as a result, null and void, Marbury v. Madison empowered the federal judiciary.
Therefore, The ruling of Marbury v. Madison influence The Federal Government to becoming too powerful
Learn more about the government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
Answer:It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
Explanation:rook a quiz
Money Management--
highschool Econ
Note that the National Financial Educators Council's money management definition is as follows:
Exercising the financial skills and information required to confidently take effective action that best satisfies an individual's personal, family, and global community goals.
What is the importance of Money Management?One of the most significant aspects of your financial life is money management. Knowing how to budget, spend, and save will help you achieve your financial objectives, get out of debt, and save.
Money enables us to satisfy our most basic requirements, such as purchasing food and shelter and paying for healthcare. Meeting these demands is critical, and if we don't have adequate money to do so, our own well-being and the community's overall well-being suffer considerably.
Learn more about Money Management:
https://brainly.com/question/3235510
#SPJ1
Full Question:
What is the High School Economics definition of Money management?
Try These questions out 1-14 I’ll give you brainliest
Answer/Explanation:
Part A:
1. The 14th Amendment could not have been intended to abolish differences based on color. PL
2. The impact of separating people just because of race is even bigger when the law says it's okay. BR
3. Laws that allow or require the races to be separate do not necessarily imply that one race is inferior. PL
4. Just because racial segregation existed when the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868 doesn't mean it is constitutional. BR
5. Separate educational facilities are naturally unequal. BR
6. State governments have the power to decide whether to keep the races separate. PL
7.Children and adults can be treated differently under the law, so equality under the law doesn't mean blacks and whites must be treated exactly the same. PL
8.Making facilities equal isn't enough as long as blacks and whites are still are separated. BR
9.The 14th Amendment could not have been intended to force the two races to mingle together when they don't want to. PL
10. Research shows that separating white and black children just because of their race makes black children feel like they are inferior. BR
11. If requiring blacks and whites to be separate suggests that blacks are inferior, it is only because black people choose to see it that way. PL
12. Laws cannot change social prejudices. PL
13. Blacks and whites can only have social equality by appreciating each other and choosing to be together. PL
14. . Separating the races in school makes them unequal under the law and violates the 14th Amendment. BR
Part B:
Do you think Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train? Yes O No Based on your answer, imagine one argument the Brown court might have made for or against Plessy.
Answer:
If Argue For: Riding a train is necessary for some people, and being separated could make them feel inferior.
If Argue Against: An adult on a train isn't like a child in school, so the separation wont' have the same effect.
RevyBreeze
7. What problems exist with the Electoral College?
The problem that exists with the Electoral College is the popular vote winner is not always declared the winner.
What is Electoral College?Electors are not required to vote in accordance with the popular vote, and any election may have to be settled in the House of Representatives.
There are three issues with the College: 'Undemocratic,' it is; It allows for the election of a candidate even if they receive fewer votes.
The votes cast for the losing candidates in each state are discarded due to its winner-takes-all system.
Therefore, the problem is the popular vote winner is not always declared the winner.
Learn more about Electoral College, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28207874
#SPJ1
Primary Source Analysis: Aristotle encouraged his student Alexander the Great in his conquests, telling him:
"Be a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians. Look after the former as after friends and relatives and deal with the latter as with beasts or plants."
6. From the reading, how did Aristotle believe a society should be best run? How does the above quote reveal some potential problems with his idea?
Answer:
From the reading, Aristotle believed that a society should be best run with a two-tiered system, where the Greeks were to be treated as friends and relatives and the barbarians were to be treated as beasts or plants. He encouraged his student Alexander the Great to be a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians.
The above quote reveals some potential problems with Aristotle's idea as it promotes a discriminatory and unequal treatment of people based on their ethnic or cultural background. The use of the term "despot" for the treatment of the barbarians suggests a harsh, oppressive, and absolute rule, while the term "friends and relatives" for the Greeks suggests a more benevolent and nurturing approach. This two-tiered system is a reflection of Aristotle's belief in cultural and ethical superiority of the Greeks over the barbarians, which is a problematic and unethical idea.
A brief history of quantitative technique
The quantitative technique can be traced to the early days of mathematics and statistics.
A brief history of quantitative techniqueQuantitative techniques, also known as quantitative methods, have a long history dating back to the early days of mathematics and statistics. The development of quantitative techniques can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, who used mathematical models to make predictions and analyze data.
In the 19th century, the use of quantitative techniques became more widespread as the field of statistics emerged and the first statistical methods were developed. During this time, advances in mathematical models, data collection, and analysis made it possible to apply quantitative methods to a wide range of fields, including economics, sociology, and psychology.
In the 20th century, the use of computers revolutionized the field of quantitative methods, making it possible to analyze vast amounts of data and perform complex mathematical calculations with ease. This led to the development of new statistical methods, such as regression analysis and multivariate analysis, and the widespread use of quantitative methods in many fields.
Read more on quantitative technique here:https://brainly.com/question/14454038
#SPJ1
Who pushed for a continuation of Europeans traditions in post colonial Latin America
Answer:
Creole elites pushed for a continuation of European traditions in postcolonial Latin America.
Explanation:
have great day
How did Roman Assemblies contribute to the democratic principle of checks and balances?
Assemblies checked the qualifications of judges.
Assemblies appointed dictators in times of crisis.
Assemblies provided a balance of power.
Assemblies ran the courts.
The way that the Roman Assemblies contributed to the democratic principle of checks and balances was C. Assemblies provided a balance of power.
How were Assemblies important in Rome ?The Roman Republic had two main assemblies, the Senate and the Popular Assemblies. These assemblies played a crucial role in the implementation of checks and balances. The Senate, made up of wealthy patricians, was responsible for making laws and advising the consuls.
The Popular Assemblies, on the other hand, represented the plebeians and were responsible for electing magistrates, passing laws, and making decisions on war and peace. This separation of powers between the Senate and Popular Assemblies helped to prevent any one group from having too much power, which was an important principle of checks and balances.
Find out more on Assemblies in Rome at https://brainly.com/question/501861
#SPJ1
C.
How did Roman Assemblies contribute to the democratic principle of checks and balances?
Assemblies checked the qualifications of judges.
Assemblies appointed dictators in times of crisis.
Assemblies provided a balance of power.
Assemblies ran the courts.
Obal Conflicts: 1914 to World War II
Which of the following was an example of a political genocide?
1-Peloponnesian War between the Athenians and Spartans (432 B.C. - 404
2-Expulsion of the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire after World War I
3-Napoleonic invasion of Russia in 1812
4-Six-Day War between Israel, Egypt, and Syria in 1967
An example of a political genocide in this context is: expulsion of the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire after World War I. The Option 2 is correct.
What should we know about political genocide?The deliberate physical destruction or elimination of a group whose members share the main characteristic of belonging to a political movement is also known as politicide. It is a form of political repression and one of the methods used to politically cleanse populations, along with forced migration.
Expulsion of the Armenians is considered by many as the first modern genocide of the 20th century, resulted in the killing of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman government during and after World War I. The genocide was carried out as part of a broader campaign aimed at forcibly removing the Armenian population from the Ottoman Empire and resulted in widespread death, forced displacement, and cultural destruction.
Read more about political genocide
brainly.com/question/10045353
#SPJ1