HELP PLZZ ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST AND POINTS

Read the following excerpt from a bigger passage.

from President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Special Message to the Congress: The American Promise March 15, 1965

Although the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guaranteed African Americans the right to vote in 1870, most were still barred from voting almost a century later by local regulations and practices. On March 15, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson delivered this speech urging the U.S. Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act, which would outlaw all such barriers.

At times history and fate meet at a single time in a single place to shape a turning point in man’s unending search for freedom. So it was at Lexington and Concord. So it was a century ago at Appomattox. So it was last week in Selma, Alabama. There, long-suffering men and women peacefully protested the denial of their rights as Americans. Many were brutally assaulted. One good man, a man of God, was killed.

There is no cause for pride in what has happened in Selma. There is no cause for self-satisfaction in the long denial of equal rights of millions of Americans. But there is cause for hope and for faith in our democracy in what is happening here tonight. For the cries of pain and the hymns and protests of oppressed people have summoned into convocation all the majesty of this great Government—the Government of the greatest Nation on earth. Our mission is at once the oldest and the most basic of this country: to right wrong, to do justice, to serve man.

Wednesday I will send to Congress a law designed to eliminate illegal barriers to the right to vote. . . . This bill will strike down restrictions4 to voting in all elections—Federal, State, and local—which have been used to deny Negroes the right to vote. . . .

So I say to all of you here, and to all in the Nation tonight, that those who appeal to you to hold on to the past do so at the cost of denying you your future. This great, rich, restless country can offer opportunity and education and hope to all: black and white, North and South, sharecropper and city dweller. These are the enemies: poverty, ignorance, disease. They are the enemies and not our fellow man, not our neighbor. And these enemies too, poverty, disease and ignorance, we shall overcome. . .

Which of these statements best describes the problem Johnson is trying to address with this speech.
A) African Americans lack the right to vote.

B) Not enough people understand the importance of what happened at Lexington, Concord, and Appotmattox

C) Poor whites have been held back by bigotry

D) The duty of civil rights is a heavy burden for Americans

Answer:

mythology and mythical goes to myth. telegraph and television goes to tele and automatic and automobile goes to auto.

Answer:

AUTO:

automatic

automobile

MYTH:

mythology

mythical

TELE:

television

telegraph

Explanation:

There u go don't forget to smile today:)

Answer: im so sorry i tried to translate it because it wasn't working

Explanation:

Answer:The first sentence. If you can't select that then I am unsure

Explanation:

Answer:

figure

Explanation:

Answer:

Cillians relationship with his mother

Explanation:

df

Answer:

Then your character walks out the chinese restaurant, and says nothing....

When your character gets in the car they think should they leave the city...then mins later they decide I'll just leave the city to make sure. They drive to there home and grab there stuff quickly....Then hops in the car and leaves the city.......as they left the city they get a mysterious call-...... What happens next? Should they answer?

Explanation:

Hope this helps, I tried my best LOL

The author showed the struggle of the characters in "The Grapes of Wrath" by; advocating social change by indicating the unfair working conditions the migrants face when they reach California.

The Grapes of Wrath can be interpreted as a proletarian novel, advocating social change by showing the unfair working conditions faced by migrants when they reach California. The men who own the land there hold the power, and attempt to control supply and demand so that they can get away with paying poor wages.

Read more on The grapes of Wrath;

https://brainly.com/question/895499

Answer:

B. A character who plays a trick.

Explanation:

According to the excerpt given, the narrator describes his encounter with a strange being who called him and changed from a monster dragon to a man who was bowing to him. He described the man as wearing a crown in the shape of a dragon's head and his dress patterned with shells.

The element of a folktale that is displayed in this excerpt is a character who plays a trick because it is certain that the dragon changed to a man but still retained some aspects of himself in his new form and his plan was probably to trick the narrator.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

answered in bottom

Explanation:

Were you get rained, for your future of outcome. school helps you get ready for your future.

Answer:

B. inconveniently

Explanation:

the closest synonym is inconveniently

Answer:

Facts indicate that a text is expository

Answer:

Inaccessible

Explanation:

The answer would be Inaccessible because in means not and if you combine both accessible and not together it will say not accessible.

Answer: In the article “Foreign News at a Crisis Point,” Peter S. Goodman eloquently argues the ‘point’ that news organizations should increase the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to people in the United States. Goodman builds his argument by using facts and evidence, addressing the counterarguments, and couching it all in persuasive and compelling language.

Goodman begins the article by bombarding the reader with facts and statistics. He states that, according to a census conducted by the American Journalism Review, the number of full-time foreign news correspondents in the United States dropped from 307 in 2003 to 234 in 2011. In addition, the AJR survey also discovered that “the space devoted to foreign news [in American papers] had shrunk by 53 percent” in the last 25 years.

Beginning the article with all of these facts and figures has a couple of strengthening effects on Goodman’s argument. First, by starting out with hard evidence, Goodman lays the groundwork of his own credibility. He’s not just writing an opinion piece – his opinion is backed by the truth. This will bring the readers onboard and make them more likely to trust everything else he says. Second, because Goodman presents these facts without much explaining/interpreting, the reader is forced to do the math herself. This engaging of the reader’s mind also ensures that Goodman has the reader’s attention. When the reader does the math to find a drop of 73 full-time foreign news correspondents employed by US papers in just 8 short years, she will find herself predisposed to agree with Goodman’s call for more professional foreign news reporting.

In addition to employing facts to his argument’s advantage, Goodman also cunningly discusses the counterargument to his position. By writing about how social media and man-on-the-ground reporting has had some positive impact on the state of foreign news reporting, Goodman heads off naysayers at the pass. It would have been very easy for Goodman to elide over the whole issue of citizen reporting, but the resultant one-sided argument would have been much less convincing. Instead, Goodman acknowledges things like “the force of social media during the Arab Spring, as activists convened and reacted to changing circumstances.” As a result, when he partially refutes this counterargument, stating the “unease” many longtime profession correspondents feel over the trend of ‘citizen journalism’ feel, the reader is much more likely to believe him. After all, Goodman acknowledges that social media does have some power. Knowing that Goodman takes the power of social media seriously will make the reader more inclined, in turn, to take Goodman’s concern about the limits of social media seriously.

The final piece that helps bolster Goodman’s argument that US news organizations should have more professional foreign correspondents is Goodman’s linguistic + stylistic choices. Goodman uses contrasts to draw the reader deeper into his mindset. By setting up the contrast between professional reporters as “informational filters” that discriminate good from bad and amateur, man-on-the-spot reporters as undiscriminating “funnels,” Goodman forces the reader to view the two in opposition and admit that professional filters are to be preferred over funnels that add “speculation, propaganda, and other white noise” to their reporting. In addition, Goodman drives the reader along toward agreeing with his conclusion in the penultimate paragraph of the article with the repetition of the phrase “We need.” With every repetition, Goodman hammers even further home the inescapable rightness of his argument. The use of “We” more generally through the article serves to make the readers feel sympathetic towards Goodman and identify with him.

By employing the rhetorical techniques of presenting facts, acknowledging the other side, and using persuasive language, Goodman convinces the reader of his claim.

In April 1963 King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined with Birmingham, Alabama’s existing local movement, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), in a massive direct action campaign to attack the city’s segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the Easter season, the second biggest shopping season of the year. As ACMHR founder Fred Shuttlesworth stated in the group’s “Birmingham Manifesto,” the campaign was “a moral witness to give our community a chance to survive” (ACMHR, 3 April 1963).

The campaign was originally scheduled to begin in early March 1963, but was postponed until 2 April when the relatively moderate Albert Boutwell defeated Birmingham’s segregationist commissioner of public safety, Eugene “Bull” Connor, in a run-off mayoral election. On 3 April the desegregation campaign was launched with a series of mass meetings, direct actions, lunch counter sit-ins, marches on City Hall, and a boycott of downtown merchants. King spoke to black citizens about the philosophy of nonviolence and its methods, and extended appeals for volunteers at the end of the mass meetings. With the number of volunteers increasing daily, actions soon expanded to kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county building to register voters. Hundreds were arrested.

On 10 April the city government obtained a state circuit court injunction against the protests. After heavy debate, campaign leaders decided to disobey the court order. King declared: “We cannot in all good conscience obey such an injunction which is an unjust, undemocratic and unconstitutional misuse of the legal process” (ACMHR, 11 April 1963). Plans to continue to submit to arrest were threatened, however, because the money available for cash bonds was depleted, so leaders could no longer guarantee that arrested protesters would be released. King contemplated whether he and Ralph Abernathy should be arrested. Given the lack of bail funds, King’s services as a fundraiser were desperately needed, but King also worried that his failure to submit to arrests might undermine his credibility. King concluded that he must risk going to jail in Birmingham. He told his colleagues: “I don’t know what will happen; I don’t know where the money will come from. But I have to make a faith act” (King, 73).

On Good Friday, 12 April, King was arrested in Birmingham after violating the anti-protest injunction and was kept in solitary confinement. During this time King penned the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” on the margins of the Birmingham News, in reaction to a statement published in that newspaper by eight Birmingham clergymen condemning the protests. King’s request to call his wife, Coretta Scott King, who was at home in Atlanta recovering from the birth of their fourth child, was denied. After she communicated her concern to the Kennedy administration, Birmingham officials permitted King to call home. Bail money was made available, and he was released on 20 April 1963.

In order to sustain the campaign, SCLC organizer James Bevel proposed using young children in demonstrations. Bevel’s rationale for the Children’s Crusade was that young people represented an untapped source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older activists. On 2 May more than 1,000 African American students attempted to march into downtown Birmingham, and hundreds were arrested. When hundreds more gathered the following day, Commissioner Connor directed local police and fire departments to use force to halt the demonstrations. During the next few days images of children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses, clubbed by police officers, and attacked by police dogs appeared on television and in newspapers, triggering international outrage. While leading a group of child marchers, Shuttlesworth himself was hit with the full force of a fire hose and had to be hospitalized. King offered encouragement to parents of the young protesters: “Don’t worry about your children, they’re going to be alright. Don’t hold them back if they want to go to jail. For they are doing a job for not only themselves, but for all of America and for all mankind” (King, 6 May 1963).

In the meantime, the white business structure was weakening under adverse publicity and the unexpected decline in business due to the boycott, but many business owners and city officials were reluctant to negotiate with the protesters. With national pressure on the White House also mounting, Attorney General Robert Kennedy sent Burke Marshall, his chief civil rights assistant, to facilitate negotiations between prominent black citizens and representatives of Birmingham’s Senior Citizen's Council, the city’s business leadership.

Answer:

"A similar proverb, believed to be from Persia, says "He who wants a rose must respect the thorn". Here too the idea of imperfection is expressed, teaching that one can only have a loving relationship with another after respecting that individual's differences and flaws"-phrases dot or g

Explanation:

Answer:

you said thanks for an answer and added me i never answered a question lol

Explanation:

answer:

what underlined section?

explanation:

i truly want to help you but there's no context to the question.

Answer: Correct as is.

Explanation:

Answer:

Flashforward & Prince’s Point Of View

I wandered through the warmth of the desert until I could no longer. I had been traveling for years. Was I ever to find my Rapunzel again? I began to weep over my loss. Suddenly, I heard it. The sweetest music of my love’s voice. It was her. It had to be. I stumbled towards the voice. I heard her walking towards me, and felt her soft hand upon my face. She held me in her arms, and cried. Her bittersweet tears dripped from her eyes to mine. I stroked her face, hoping to visualize my sweet Rapunzel again.

Earlier  

There were once a man and a woman who had long in vain wished for a child. At length the woman hoped that God was about to grant her desire. These people had a little window at the back of their house from which a splendid garden could be seen, which was full of the most beautiful flowers and herbs. It was, however, surrounded by a high wall, and no one dared to go into it because it belonged to an enchantress, who had great power and was dreaded by all the world. One day the woman was standing by this window and looking down into the garden, when she saw a bed which was planted with the most beautiful rampion (rapunzel), and it looked so fresh and green that she longed for it, she quite pined away, and began to look pale and miserable. Then her husband was alarmed, and asked: 'What ails you, dear wife?' 'Ah,' she replied, 'if I can't eat some of the rampion, which is in the garden behind our house, I shall die.' The man, who loved her, thought: 'Sooner than let your wife die, bring her some of the rampion yourself, let it cost what it will.' At twilight, he clambered down over the wall into the garden of the enchantress, hastily clutched a handful of rampion, and took it to his wife. She at once made herself a salad of it, and ate it greedily. It tasted so good to her—so very good, that the next day she longed for it three times as much as before. If he was to have any rest, her husband must once more descend into the garden. In the gloom of evening therefore, he let himself down again; but when he had clambered down the wall he was terribly afraid, for he saw the enchantress standing before him. 'How can you dare,' said she with angry look, 'descend into my garden and steal my rampion like a thief? You shall suffer for it!' 'Ah,' answered he, 'let mercy take the place of justice, I only made up my mind to do it out of necessity. My wife saw your rampion from the window, and felt such a longing for it that she would have died if she had not got some to eat.' Then the enchantress allowed her anger to be softened, and said to him: 'If the case be as you say, I will allow you to take away with you as much rampion as you will, only I make one condition, you must give me the child which your wife will bring into the world; it shall be well treated, and I will care for it like a mother.' The man in his terror consented to everything, and when the woman was brought to bed, the enchantress appeared at once, gave the child the name of Rapunzel, and took it away with her.  

Rapunzel grew into the most beautiful child under the sun. When she was twelve years old, the enchantress shut her into a tower, which lay in a forest, and had neither stairs nor door, but quite at the top was a little window. When the enchantress wanted to go in, she placed herself beneath it and cried:

'Rapunzel, Rapunzel, Let down your hair to me.'

Rapunzel had magnificent long hair, fine as spun gold, and when she heard the voice of the enchantress she unfastened her braided tresses, wound them round one of the hooks of the window above, and then the hair fell twenty ells down, and the enchantress climbed up by it.

Rapunzel’s POV  

I was terrified when the strange man leaped through my window. I had never seen a man before. Our eyes met, then he spoke to me. That is when i knew; i was going to love this man.  

Gothel’s POV

I heard the snip of the scissors and the sound of my Rapunzel’s heart breaking. She had betrayed me, and had to pay for her bad behavior. I would miss her. Really. However, my job was nowhere near finished. I still had to eliminate her prince.  

Reasoning  

I chose the Flashforward and parallel plot techniques. Flashforwarding is a way to get the reader’s attention and have them want more or tp expect more. Parallel Plot helps to aid my understanding of each character in the story and their individual feelings.  

Explanation:

The speech is an example of metatheatre as it allows the play speak for itself to depict the circumstances.

A metatheatre simply means the aspect of a play which draw attention to the circumstances of the performance.

In this case, the speech is an example of metatheatre as it allows the play speak for itself to depict the circumstances. This is common with Shakespeare's works.

Learn more about speech on:

https://brainly.com/question/25887038

Answer:

the answer is A

Answer:

you can whatever ones you want...

Explanation:

The theme illustrated in the story is that when one is confident, the person can find the strength and inner peace to be able to do anything.

A theme simply means the underlying message that's in a story. It's what the author wants the readers to know.

The theme that's illustrated is that if one is confident, the person can find the strength and inner peace to be able to do anything. The comments of the general was important for the plot to move forward.

Learn more about theme on:

https://brainly.com/question/11600913

Answer:

third option - the ingenuity of German design was apparent even when quality materials were unavailable.

Explanation:

Cheers!

Answer:

The purpose of prewriting

Explanation:

The purpose of prewriting is to give the writer some time to come up with what they want to put down, it's kind of like brainstorming everything and jotting down things so that the writer can get more of a sense of what they are writing about.

Question:

The story below is culled from the "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass."

In the afternoon of that day, we reached Annapolis, the capital of the State. We stopped but a few moments so that I had no time to go onshore. It was the first large town that I had ever seen, and thought it would look small compared with some of our New England factory villages, I thought it a wonderful place for its size – more imposing even than the Great House Farm!

Which of these is a true statement about travel during Douglass's youth?

Answer:

It was a rare occurence for any slave to go beyond the perimeters of the plantation where they were required to work and even sleep sometimes.

So the trip to Baltimore was a great privilege, one that Frederick, who had lived most of his life on the farm, found to be a refreshing experience.

Cheers

Answer:

It was a rare occurence for any slave to go beyond the perimeters of the plantation where they were required to work and even sleep sometimes.

So the trip to Baltimore was a great privilege, one that Frederick, who had lived most of his life on the farm, found to be a refreshing experience.

Explanation:

i did it on Edge

Incomplete question. I provided a brief about information and how it is presented to be easily understood.

Explanation:

Information generally refers to facts that are made available or presented to the desired audience.

Common forms of presenting information in a way that they would easily be understood include:

Answer:

Bullying can happen in many ways....

Explanation:

it is a responsibility though??

Answer:

A. such

Explanation:

I’m assuming that you want the word that is incorrect in the sentence which would be ‘such’ as it does not make sense in the sentence. It would be better to write: He was so exhausted that he count even stand on his feet.