grrrrrr please help i’ll give u a cookie :)

Answer:

word problems are pretty tricky

Step-by-step explanation:

y= punch

2*y > 4  Liters

y >2 Liters

Answer:2y>4

Step-by-step explanation:

Two times the amount of punch needed =2y. Because this amount must be greater than 4 liters, the inequality is given by 2y>4

Answer:

17160

Step-by-step explanation:

first there are 13 options

then there are 13 - 1 that was chosen

then there are 13 - 2 that were chosen

then there are 13 - 3 that were chosen

so that's 13 options, then 12 options, then 11 options, and then 10 options

and in order to figure out all of the possibilties we mutiply the options so

13*12*11*10 = 17160

little further explaining of why this works:

we have a set of letters (3 in a set)

A B C

what are the possible combinations?

AB

AC

BC

BA

CA

CB

the answer is 6 which is also 3 * 2 * 1 = 6

HOPE THAT HELPS!1! ^_^

Using the Fundamental Counting Theorem, it is found that there are 28,561 ways in which four cards, each of a different face value, can be chosen.

Fundamental counting theorem:

States that if there are n things, each with [tex]n_1, n_2, …, n_n[/tex] ways to be done, each thing independent of the other, the number of ways they can be done is:

[tex]N = n_1 \times n_2 \times \cdots \times n_n[/tex]

In this problem, four cards are chosen, each with 13 ways, hence [tex]n_1 = n_2 = n_3  = n_4 = 13[/tex], and:

[tex]T = 13 \times 13 \times 13 \times 13 = 13^4 = 28561[/tex]

There are 28,561 ways in which four cards, each of a different face value, can be chosen.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/19022577

Answer:

a

   This data does not  support the Minister of Commerce or Amnesty

International

b

Another issue that is  important when evaluating this data is the judicial system of the Turgistan

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The  sample size is  n  =  500

 The  number of political  prisoners is  k  =  90

  The  level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

        The null hypothesis  is  [tex]H_o  :  p =  \frac{1}{3} =  0.33[/tex]

        The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : p \ne  0.33[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion is mathematically represented as

      [tex]\^ p  =  \frac{k}{n}[/tex]

=>   [tex]\^ p  =  \frac{90}{500}[/tex]

=>   [tex]\^ p  =  0.18[/tex]

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

    [tex]z =  \frac{\^ p  -  p}{\sqrt{\frac{p (1- p)}{n} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]z =  \frac{0.18  -  0.40}{\sqrt{\frac{0.33 (1- 0.33)}{500} } }[/tex]      

=>  [tex]z = -7.1429 [/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p-value  =  2 *  P( Z  >  -7.1429)[/tex]

From the normally distribution table

    The  probability of [tex]P( Z  >  -7.1429)  =  0[/tex]

=>     [tex]p-value  =  2 * 0[/tex]

=>     [tex]p-value  =  0[/tex]  

From the value obtained we see that the [tex]p-value  <  \alpha[/tex] hence the decision rule is

  Reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is  

  There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that  this data does support the Minister of Commerce or Amnesty International

jj

Answer:

2 mi per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3*6=

6/3= 2

2 mi per hour

Answer:

2mph

Step-by-step explanation:

If a person walks 1/3 of a mile every 1/6 of an hour you divide to solve.

[tex]\frac{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{6}}[/tex] To solve you flip the bottom and multiply:

[tex]\frac{1}{3} *\frac{6}{1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{6}{3} = 2[/tex]

The person is walking 2mph

Answer:  A) The equation will be     x + 4x + x + 10 = 82   B) Paul's age is 12, Rebecca's age is 48  and Gemma's age is 22.

Step-by-step explanation:

We will represent Paul's age by    the equation  p= x  where p is Paul

We will represent Rebecca's age by the equation  r = 4x  Where r is Rebecca

We will represent Gemma's age by the equation g = x + 10  where g is also Gemma's age.

We given that the sum of their ages is 82 years so meaning that  x + 4x + x + 10  has to equal 82.

A) The equation will be     x + 4x + x + 10 = 82  

Solve for the x equation to find Paul age because his age is x.

B)  (x) + (4x) + (x+10) = 82   combine like terms on the left side

    6x + 10 = 82

           -10    -10

   6x = 72

   x= 12  

Paul age is 12.  

r= 4(12)

r = 48

Rebecca's age is 48.

g= 12 +10

g= 22

Gemma's age is 22.  

Answer:

50.1

The area of the composite figure is 50.1

Trust me

Answer:

4th degree, so option 2

Step-by-step explanation:

the graph has 4 zeros (coordinates where y=0)

Answer:

RQS=100 & TQS=80

Step-by-step explanation:

add them and set it equal to 180 because it is a straight line

9x+1 + 7x+3 = 180

16x+4=180 (subtract 4 from both sides)

16x=176 (divide 16 from both sides)

x=11 (plug 11 into the angles)

9(11)+1=RQS & 7(11)+3=TQS

only have to solve one of them and subtract it from 180 to get the second angle since they are supplementary

Answer:

RQS=100 & TQS=80

Step-by-step explanation:

add them and set it equal to 180 because it is a straight line

9x+1 + 7x+3 = 180

16x+4=180

16x=176  

x=11  

9(11)+1=RQS & 7(11)+3=TQS

you only have to solve one of them and subtract it from 180 to get the second angle since they are supplementary .

hope this helped!

p.s it would be cool if you gave me brainliest.

Answer:

I not see the number 2

I think that is number 2

Answer:

first and last one should be the answer (not sure about the first, cant see it too good)

Answer:

The​ homoskedasticity-only F​-statistic and the​ heteroskedasticity-robust F​-statistic typically​ are different.

Step-by-step explanation:

An F statistic is a value derived by running an ANOVA test or a regression analysis to find out if the means between two populations are significantly different.

The homoskedasticity-only” F-statistic is derived by running two regressions, one under the null hypothesis and one under the alternative hypothesis. If the “unrestricted” model fits sufficiently better, reject the null.

In the first regression, the restricted regression (the null hypothesis) is forced to be true. This is the regression in which all the coefficients are set to zero; the relevant regressors are excluded from the regression. In the second regression, the unrestricted regression, the alternative hypothesis is allowed to be true. If the sum of squared residuals is sufficiently smaller in the unrestricted than the restricted regression, then the test rejects the null hypothesis

The heteroskedasticity-robust F-statistic is built in to STATA (“test” command); this tests all q  restrictions at once.

The homoskedasticity-only F-statistic is important historically (and also in practice), and can  help intuition, but isn’t valid when there is heteroskedasticity

Answer:

34

Step-by-step explanation:

16+18 34 should help

Answer:

34

Step-by-step explanation:

2*8=16

9*2=18

16+18=34

Answer:

If this is basic mathematics its =

Step-by-step explanation:

You won't have to worry about sig figs until chemistry.

Answer:

4a^3b − 6a^2c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13 milliliters

Step-by-step explanation:

it is 13

Answer:

it is D trust me

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is d

Step-by-step explanation:

the way you can figure this out is by looking at the figures and finding what transformation came first because of the number of prime notations on a letter in a figure. in this case is was ABC first then A'B'C' then A''B''C''

using that we can now determine the order of how the composition will be written. the first step of the composition is the left most part and the last part of the composition is the right most part. basicly the order is left to right.

we see that figure ABC is reflected across the line m to create the figure A'B'C' relections are written like r for the relection and the sub letter is the line the figure is reflected across to in this case it would be written as r sub m meaning that r sub m is the 2nd part of the composition.

the 2nd step in the composition is when figure A'B'C' turns into figure A''B''C'' the way we find out its transformation is determine whether it was slid or if it was rotated aroound a point of rotation. here we have a rotation. now we got to determine what the center of roation is. in this case its B'. looking at the options there is no negative -90 degrees which means that the rotation happened counter clockwise because all valuse are positive. counter clockwise is to the left. now simple math figure A'B'C 180 degrees would make it need 90 more degrees so 180+90=270 thats the degree of the roation around point B'

rotations are written as R sub point of rotation, __ degrees. in our case it is r sub B', 270 degrees. this is the second step so it will be on the right of the equation.  the full equation turns out to be R sub B', 270 degrees composition of transformations r sub m.

it must be that way because if you rotated the figure first then reflected it it would look like an entirely different image.

pls give brainliest

Answer:

[tex] \large{3 \times 3 - 2 \times 2}[/tex]

[tex] \large{9 - 4}[/tex]

[tex] \large{5}[/tex]

Answer:

3/35

Step-by-step explanation:

3*1=3

5*7=35

3/35

Answer:

ok

Step-by-step explanation:

heres a memeeeee

Answer:

270 degree rotation about point 0 composition .translations of negative 2 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Took the test

Answer:

y = 2x + 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember, slope-intercept form is:

y = mx + b

where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

To write the equation in slope-intercept form, we can just solve the equation for slope-intercept form.

y - 4 = 2(x + 3)

Distribute the 2 on the right side.

y - 4 = 2x + 6

Add 4 to both sides.

y = 2x + 10

Notice, now we have the equation in slope-intercept form.

I hope this helps. Happy studying.

Answer:

x = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x = 4-1

2x = 3

x = 3/2

hope it will be helpfull

Answer:  x ≤ 6

Solution:  -10, -4, 0, 3, 6

Not a solution: 10

Plz mark brainliest:)

The answer to the inequality is [tex]x[/tex] ≤ [tex]6[/tex]

First, you must subtract 17 on both sides

[tex]-2x[/tex] ≥ [tex]-12[/tex]

Then, you must divide -2 on both sides.

[tex]x[/tex] ≥ [tex]6[/tex]

Finally, since x was changed from negative to positive using division, switch the inequality sign.

[tex]x[/tex] ≤ [tex]6[/tex]

Answer:

Study 2 will produce a greater power to detect an effect because it has a lower beta level

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally, alpha level is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true. Whereas beta level is the opposite and it's the probability of accepting the null hypothesis even though it’s false.

Now, in statistics the lower the alpha level, the more we require a stronger evidence. Thus, a higher alpha level is usually required to produce a stronger evidence.

Now, an increase in alpha level means a decrease in beta level and a decrease in alpha level means an increase in beta level.

This means that the lower the beta level, the greater is the power to detect an effect.

Now, we are told that the beta level in study 1 was larger than the beta level used in Study 2.

Thus, study 2 will produce a greater power to detect an effect because it has a lower beta level

Answer:

So first you must understand what your function represents the 2 is your (slope of the line) the +4 is the y intercept.

So you need to plot a point at (0,4) and then you need to use the slope to go up 2 units over 1 unit. And you need to use the negative of the slope to the left of the point you plotted on the y - int so you need to go down 2 units and left 1.

Hope you understood if you didn't drop a comment and I will try to reply.

Answer:

medians in the triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

just took the test