Answer:
During the optimistic post-World War II era, American stages commonly featured plays that celebrated the American Dream and explored social issues such as race, gender, and class. These plays often portrayed a hopeful vision of the future and encouraged audiences to believe in progress and change.
Explanation:
During the optimistic World War II era, American stages commonly featured plays that explored the American Dream and the post-war prosperity.
These plays often depicted middle-class families and their struggles with societal norms, gender roles, and suburban conformity. They also reflected the social and political changes of the time, including the Civil Rights movement and the rise of feminism.
In addition to dramas, musicals also became popular, featuring catchy tunes and dance numbers that celebrated American optimism and ingenuity.
Overall, the post-World War II era was marked by a sense of hope and possibility, and the plays and musicals of the time reflected this spirit of optimism.
To know more about World War II refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/5149577
#SPJ11
How did ethnic tensions lead to the outbreak of the Yugoslav Wars?
The ethnic groups Croats and Bosniaks lead to the outbreak of the Yugoslav Wars.
The complex ethnic and political history of the area, where competing claims to territory and power fueled long standing tensions between various ethnic groups, is what gave rise to the Yugoslav Wars.
Yugoslavia's multiethnic and multi religious society was tested in the years before the wars by economic hardship, political unrest, and the emergence of nationalist movements that aimed to establish the superiority of one ethnic group over the others.
Early in the 1990s, these tensions, which had been simmering for some time due to a variety of reasons such as territorial disputes, old grudges, and nationalist ideologies, broke out into open conflict. In the end, the wars caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of displaced people and the requirement for efficient mechanisms for resolving conflicts.
Learn more about nationalist ideologies at:
brainly.com/question/13835015
#SPJ1
Between 1967 and 2012, union membership in the United States ___________________ and income inequality ______________________.
Between 1967 and 2012, union membership in the United States experienced a significant decline and income inequality increased.
Between 1967 and 2012, union membership in the United States experienced a significant decline, while income inequality increased. In 1967, approximately 28% of U.S. workers were union members, while in 2012, the number had dropped to around 11%. This decline can be attributed to a number of factors, including the globalization of the economy, the decline of manufacturing jobs, and the rise of anti-union sentiment among some employers and policymakers.
Meanwhile, income inequality has been on the rise since the late 1970s. The top 1% of earners in the United States have seen their incomes skyrocket, while the incomes of the bottom 50% have stagnated or even declined in real terms. This trend has been driven by a number of factors, including changes in the tax code, the decline of labor unions, and the increasing role of technology in the economy.
It is worth noting that there is a correlation between union membership and income inequality. Research has shown that in countries with higher levels of union membership, income inequality tends to be lower. This is because unions can negotiate higher wages and benefits for their members, which can help to reduce the gap between the top earners and the rest of the workforce.
Overall, the decline of union membership in the United States has been a contributing factor to the rise in income inequality over the past several decades. However, there are many other factors at play, and addressing income inequality will require a comprehensive approach that takes into account the many complex economic and social factors that contribute to this problem.
For more such questions on experienced a significant decline
https://brainly.com/question/28944035
#SPJ11
compare and contrast the views of the U.S. overseas expansion in the late 19th century and the early 20th century. evaluate how understandings of national identity, at the time,
In the late 19th century, the United States embarked on a period of overseas expansion, driven by a desire to expand its influence and territories beyond its borders.
This period of expansion was motivated by a number of factors, including economic interests, a desire to spread American values and culture, and a belief in the inherent superiority of the American people. At the time, many Americans believed that it was the country's destiny to become a global power and to spread its influence around the world. This belief was rooted in a sense of national identity that was characterized by a strong sense of patriotism and a belief in American exceptionalism. Americans saw themselves as a chosen people, with a mission to spread democracy and civilization to the rest of the world.
Learn more about “ overseas expansion “ visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/30413876
#SPJ4
Question:
Compare and contrast the views of the U.S. overseas expansion in the late 19th century and the early 20th century. Evaluate how understandings of national identity, at the time, shaped these views.
The dramatic event that caused King Victor Emmanuel II to ask Mussolini to form a government in October 1922 was
The dramatic event that caused King Victor Emmanuel II to ask Mussolini to form a government in October 1922 was the March on Rome.
On October 28, 1922, Mussolini and his followers, known as the Blackshirts, marched on Rome with the intention of overthrowing the existing government and establishing a fascist regime. The march was originally planned as a show of force, but it quickly turned into a full-blown coup d'etat as the government collapsed and Mussolini was invited to form a new government by the king. The march on Rome was a culmination of years of political instability in Italy, as the country struggled with economic hardship, social unrest, and a weak government. Mussolini's promise to restore order and stability to Italy, combined with his charismatic leadership and the support of the Blackshirts, made him an attractive candidate to those looking for a strongman to take control. The March on Rome marked the beginning of the fascist era in Italy, which would last until the end of World War II.
Learn more about dramatic event here:-
https://brainly.com/question/4474901
#SPJ11
How did the Vite Cong react to the downfall of Diem?
Within a week of Diem's overthrow, the Vite Cong took control of their direction once more and launched more than a thousand strikes.
Given that Diem was one of their most ardent foes, a communist spokeswoman expressed disbelief that the Americans seemed to be in favor of his ouster.
Nguyen Huu Tho, the head of the Viet Cong, referred to the coup as a "gift of Diem's Heaven for us." Some Viet Cong officials initially believed it was a ruse because they were shocked that the Americans would support ouster.
As a result, the significance of the Vite Cong react to the downfall of Diem are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Vite Cong, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9536071
#SPJ1
HELP PLEASE N THANKKK YOUU .
The statement that best completes the diagram on the factors leading to the Rise of the Byzantine empire is A. Emperor Justinian was an effective leader.
How did the Byzantine empire rise ?Emperor Justinian was a leading force in the promotion of various areas, particularly noted for his bold governance and attempt at centralizing government activity and mobilization of the military.
As a result of these endeavors, the Byzantine Empire was given sound administrative control spread over its expansive realm, as well as the potential to exercise authority beyond geographical boundaries due to an unified and proficient armed forces.
Find out more on Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/21184624
#SPJ1
What are TWO claims Henry Wallace makes about why the Truman Doctrine will not be successful?
"The TWO claims that Henry Wallace makes about why the Truman Doctrine will not be successful are -
none of Truman's actions are in line with the actions of other American presidents, who have gone before him, hence acting as a traitor; He indicates that the world needs change, given the conditions that it is in, such as hunger & insecurity."The Truman Doctrine is an Ameri-can foreign policy that pled-ges American "support for democracies again-st authoritarian threats." With the Truman Doct-rine, President Harry S. Tru-man established that the United States wou-ld provide political, military & economic assistance to all demo-cratic nations under threat from exter-nal or internal author-itarian forces.
To know more about Truman Doctrine click below:
brainly.com/question/9212037
#SPJ1
explain the historical circumstances that led to the developments described in this excerpt from robert leys speech
The main goals of the French Uprising were to end feudalism and provide people with equality, opportunity, and voting-based liberties. The French Revolution sparked a wide range of unrest in other European countries.
One of the best catalysts for the French Insurgency may have been the Americans' victory over the English. The French people realised that real change was possible and that a revolution could succeed, even when against a significant military strength. Many experts claim that they were inspired to revolt by this.
The French Transformation of 1789 was a pivotal turning point in France's history as well as a significant portion of Europe.
To know more about French, click:
https://brainly.com/question/25311986
#SPJ1
what was the united nations
Answer:
a headquaters
Explanation:
Answer:
It is an intergovernmental origination which it's purpose are to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and serve as a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations. It replaced the league of nations after ww2 to avoid another horrible war.
Globalization has affected all of us in some way.
In the discussion, give a specific example of something from the 12.04: Content reading that has affected your life. Explain in detail
how that has affected your life.
Good example: The widespread use of the internet has directly affected my life. I am taking this class online, for example, and
my mom works from home 3 days a week because she can do her job online.
Bad example: People use cell phones now more than landlines. Now I can talk to my friends whenever I want.
After that, explain what you think your life would be like without that development. Or you can choose a different development and
explain what your life would be like without that one.
Answer:
For instance, the 12.04: Content reading on climate change has made me more aware of the environmental issues we face today and has inspired me to take action in reducing my carbon footprint. This has led me to make lifestyle changes such as using reusable bags and water bottles, reducing meat consumption, and supporting eco-friendly businesses.
Explanation:
How did the treaty of Greenville settle the ongoing conflict between American Indians and white settlers
The Treaty of Greenville was a crucial step towards building positive relations between Native Americans and white settlers in the early years of the United States.
The Treaty of Greenville was signed on August 3, 1795, between the United States government and the leaders of several Native American tribes, including the Shawnee, Miami, and Delaware. The treaty marked the end of the Northwest Indian War, a conflict that had been ongoing between Native Americans and white settlers in the Ohio River Valley.
Under the terms of the treaty, the Native American tribes ceded a large portion of their land to the United States, including much of present-day Ohio. In exchange, the U.S. government agreed to pay the tribes an annual sum of money and provide them with goods and services.
The Treaty of Greenville was significant because it helped to establish a new relationship between the United States government and Native American tribes. Prior to the treaty, conflicts between Native Americans and white settlers had often been violent and deadly, with both sides engaging in acts of aggression and retaliation.
By negotiating a peaceful settlement, the U.S. government demonstrated a willingness to work with Native American tribes and recognize their sovereignty. It also helped to establish clear boundaries between Native American lands and white settlements, reducing the likelihood of future conflicts.
Overall, the Treaty of Greenville was a crucial step towards building positive relations between Native Americans and white settlers in the early years of the United States. While there would still be many challenges and conflicts in the years to come, the treaty laid the foundation for a more peaceful and cooperative future.
For more such questions on Native Americans
https://brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ11
__________ was responsible for consolidating Russia's gains in the early 1700s and in making a European-style state out of the loosely knit country.
Answer:
Peter the Great
Explanation:
Peter the Great was responsible for consolidating Russia's gains in the early 1700s and in making a European-style state out of the loosely knit country.
Peter the Great ruled from 1682 until his death in 1725 and is known for his efforts to modernize Russia and bring it into line with Western European countries.
Peter implemented a number of sweeping reforms during his reign, including changes to the military, the economy, and the social structure of Russia.
Some of Peter's most notable achievements include the creation of a standing army, the introduction of new manufacturing techniques, and the establishment of a centralized administrative system that was modeled on European models.
He also implemented reforms aimed at modernizing Russia's education system and promoting the spread of new scientific and technological ideas.
Overall, Peter the Great is widely regarded as one of Russia's greatest rulers, and his legacy is still felt in Russia today. His efforts to modernize and Westernize Russia helped to lay the foundations for Russia's rise as a great power in the centuries that followed.
To know more about Peter the Great refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30484671
#SPJ11
The first Latin American nation to experience conservative reaction to the Cuban revolution by the army overthrowing their constitutional government in 1964 was
The first Latin American nation to experience conservative reaction to the Cuban revolution by the army overthrowing their constitutional government in 1964 was Brazil.
The Cuban Revolution marked a turning point in U.S.-Latin American relations by granting the U.S. the right to interfere in the political, economic, and other affairs of other nations.
This bloody revolt against the military government of President Fulgencio Batista was headed by Fidel Castro. Fulgencio Batista's government was overthrown on January 1, 1959, as a result of an armed uprising in Cuba. The coup was sparked by a botched attack on the army barracks in Santiago de Cuba on July 26, 1953.
The US considered the Cuban Revolution to be significant because it secured US interests in Cuba by restricting Cuba's ability to engage in commerce, gave the US the authority to meddle in Cuba's domestic affairs, allowed the US to establish military bases on the island, etc.
Learn more about Cuban Revolution here
https://brainly.com/question/30244276
#SPJ11
Why were opponents of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act given cause to assume corruption on the part of U.S. marshals in apprehending potential fugitive slaves
Answer:
The verdict determined Marshal's pay.
Explanation:
.
Puritans in England were not a. admirers of the Catholic elements in the Church of England b. important players in the lower House of Commons. c. reformers of the Anglican church. d. Protestant Christians. e. a large proportion of England's gentry.
The Puritans in England were Protestant Christians who sought to reform the Anglican church.
They were not admirers of the Catholic elements within the Church of England and aimed to remove these influences. The Puritans were important players in the lower House of Commons, with many members of Parliament holding Puritan beliefs. However, they were not necessarily a large proportion of England's gentry, as Puritanism was a movement that spanned across different social classes.
Through their efforts to reform the Anglican church, the Puritans played a significant role in shaping English religious and political history. They advocated for simpler forms of worship and emphasized personal piety and morality. This movement had a significant impact on the English Civil War and the ultimate downfall of the monarchy. Many Puritans also migrated to the American colonies, where their religious beliefs had a profound influence on the development of the United States.
In summary, the Puritans in England were Protestant Christians who sought to reform the Anglican church and were not admirers of Catholic elements within it. They were important players in the lower House of Commons, but their movement spanned across different social classes and was not exclusive to the gentry. Their efforts had a profound impact on English religious and political history and their legacy is still felt today.
Learn more about history :
https://brainly.com/question/5490510
#SPJ11
Why did Andrew Jackson and his military commanders underestimate the strength of the Seminole Indians in Florida during the Second Seminole War in the 1830s
Andrew Jackson and his military commanders underestimated the strength of the Seminole Indians in Florida during the Second Seminole War in the 1830s due to a combination of factors.
These include misconceptions about the Seminoles' military capabilities, their knowledge of the Florida terrain, and a lack of understanding of the Seminoles' determination to resist removal from their ancestral lands.
This miscalculation led to a prolonged conflict, as the Seminoles effectively used guerrilla warfare tactics to defend their homeland.
One reason for the underestimation of the Seminoles' strength was a misconception about their military capabilities. Jackson and his commanders believed that the Seminoles were a relatively weak and disorganized group, which would be no match for the might of the U.S. military.
However, the Seminoles were experienced fighters who had successfully resisted previous attempts to remove them from their lands.
Another factor was the Seminoles' knowledge of the Florida terrain. The Seminoles were intimately familiar with the swamps, marshes, and dense forests of Florida, which provided them with natural advantages in battle.
They were able to launch surprise attacks on U.S. troops, then disappear quickly into the dense vegetation and swampy terrain, making it difficult for the U.S. military to track them down.
To learn more about Seminoles, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/15526672
#SPJ11
Explain the extent to which the events of the period from 1945 to1980 reshaped national identity. America post WWII was vastly different in many ways.
The period from 1945 to 1980 was marked by significant events that reshaped the national identity of America. The end of World War II marked the beginning of a new era, with the US emerging as a superpower on the global stage.
This newfound power brought about a sense of national pride and identity, as Americans saw themselves as the defenders of freedom and democracy around the world.
The 1950s were marked by a wave of conservatism and conformity, as Americans sought to rebuild their country and safeguard against the threat of communism. This led to a renewed emphasis on traditional values, such as family, religion, and patriotism. The Cold War also played a significant role in shaping national identity, as Americans viewed themselves as the guardians of capitalism and democracy against the perceived threat of Soviet communism.
The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s challenged traditional notions of American identity, as African Americans and other marginalized groups demanded equal rights and recognition. This led to a new sense of national identity, as Americans began to see themselves as a more diverse and inclusive society.
To know more about national identity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14689360
#SPJ11
Which city is in the last outpost of the Republic of China, which was proclaimed by Chiang's forces in approximately 1948
The city of Taipei is known as the last outpost of the Republic of China, which was proclaimed by Chiang's forces in approximately 1948.
After the Chinese Civil War, the Communist Party of China (CPC) emerged victorious, and the Republic of China (ROC) government led by Chiang Kai-shek retreated to Taiwan. In 1949, Chiang proclaimed Taipei as the temporary capital of the ROC and established a government-in-exile. For many years, the ROC government claimed to be the legitimate government of all of China, while the People's Republic of China (PRC) claimed the same. The situation led to political tension and occasional military conflict, but the ROC government maintained control over Taiwan and a few other islands, while the PRC controlled mainland China. Today, Taipei is the capital of Taiwan and is still sometimes referred to as the last outpost of the ROC.
Learn more about “ Chinese Civil War,“ visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/11739264
#SPJ4
In East Africa, ________ used forced labor for the growing of cotton, provoking the fierce but in the end brutally suppressed Maji Maji Rebellion of 1905-1907.
Answer: Great Britain
Briefly explain ONE specific historical event or development that supports the argument that the Kennedy administration placed less reliance on massive retaliation and nuclear weapons than did other administrations.
An American general's leg was damaged and they built a statue of the leg put up after the battle. Which battle was it
The Battle of Franklin in 1864 during the American Civil War is the battle in which an American general's leg was damaged and a statue of the leg was put up after the battle. The general was Major General Patrick Cleburne of the Confederate Army, who was killed during the battle.
A monument of his leg was later erected at St. John's Episcopal Church in Ashwood, Tennessee, near the site of his death. The battle referred to in the question is the Battle of Franklin during the American Civil War. General Patrick Cleburne, a Confederate officer, was leading a charge when he was shot in the foot and fell from his horse. He later died from his wounds. After the battle, a statue of Cleburne's leg was erected in his honor in Carnton Plantation, which served as a field hospital during the battle. The statue was created by a Confederate surgeon, Dr. David Cheek, who had amputated Cleburne's leg. The statue is now a famous historical artifact and tourist attraction.
Learn more about “ American Civil War “ visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/769992
#SPJ4
During the latter half of the 20th century, leaders in China as well as other industrialized nations challenged the views presented by Mao in that they
During the latter half of the 20th century, leaders in China as well as other industrialized nations challenged the views presented by Mao in that they sought to adopt more market-oriented economic policies and move away from the centralized control of the economy that Mao had championed.
In China, this shift began in the late 1970s with the implementation of economic reforms under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping. These reforms, which became known as "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics," aimed to modernize the economy and open it up to foreign investment while still maintaining the Communist Party's political control.
In other industrialized nations, such as the United States and Western Europe, the latter half of the 20th century was marked by a shift towards neoliberal economic policies that emphasized free markets, deregulation, and privatization.
This shift was driven in part by a belief that government intervention in the economy was inefficient and ineffective, and that markets could allocate resources more efficiently.
Overall, the latter half of the 20th century saw a broad-based shift away from the state-led economic models that had been dominant in the early part of the century, towards more market-oriented approaches that emphasized individual choice, private enterprise, and economic growth.
To know more about industrialized nations refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/28045651
#SPJ11
Why might China have allied with the kingdom of Silla when exerting its influence in the Korean peninsula
Answer:
Explanation:
A campaign of expansion in the fourth century CE brought Silla into possession of Manchuria, which led to closer ties with China.
What event allowed Adolf Hitler to consolidate his power and eventually take control of the German government
Answer: The Enabling Act
Explanation:
The passing of the enabling act is significant in German and world history as it marked the formal transition from the democratic weimar republic to the totalitarian nazi dictatorship. From 1933 onwards hitler continued to consolidate and centralize power via purges, and propaganda.
Affluence and Its Anxieties Know: IBM, Information Age, Ozzie and Harriet, The Feminine Mystique 25. What was life like for women in the 1950's
Life for women in the 1950s was characterized by a return to traditional gender roles, where women were expected to focus primarily on domestic duties and raising children.
The idealized image of the "perfect" 1950s woman was popularized through media portrayals such as the TV show "Ozzie and Harriet." Women were expected to be homemakers, caring for their families and making their homes comfortable and welcoming.
Many women felt unfulfilled and restless in these traditional roles and sought greater opportunities for education and employment. Betty Friedan's book "The Feminine Mystique" was a key voice in the emerging feminist movement, which sought to challenge traditional gender roles and create greater opportunities for women in all areas of life.
Despite these challenges, the 1950s saw significant advances in technology, including the rise of the Information Age, with the emergence of computing giants such as IBM.
To know more about gender roles refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/12225393
#SPJ11
In the 20th century, overall indicators of health ______. Group of answer choices stayed the same across the globe worsened in wealthy countries improved across the globe worsened across the globe
In the 20th century, overall indicators of health improved across the globe. While some disparities may still exist between countries, overall health indicators have generally shown improvement worldwide.
This improvement in global health can be attributed to advancements in medical technology and public health practices, such as vaccination campaigns and sanitation initiatives. Additionally, improvements in global nutrition and access to clean water have contributed to improved health outcomes, particularly in developing countries.
Despite these improvements, however, there are still significant challenges facing the global health community, such as the emergence of new diseases and the persistence of health disparities among different populations.
Know more about health indicators:
https://brainly.com/question/9257970
#SPJ11
The author whose writings applied the revolutionary doctrines of the rights of man to include women was
The author whose writings applied the revolutionary doctrines of the rights of men to include women was C. Mary Wollstonecraft.
She was an influential writer, philosopher, and advocate for women's rights during the late 18th century. Wollstonecraft's most famous work, "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman" (1792), is considered one of the earliest and most significant feminist texts.
In this groundbreaking work, Wollstonecraft argued that women, like men, should have access to education, opportunities, and political rights. She contended that society treated women as second-class citizens, limiting their potential and fostering dependence on men. Wollstonecraft's writing was a response to the popular notion at the time that women were inferior to men, and her advocacy for gender equality was revolutionary.
Unlike Millicent Fawcett, who focused primarily on women's suffrage and political equality, or Emmeline Pankhurst, who led the militant British suffragette movement, Wollstonecraft took a broader approach to women's rights. Virginia Woolf, on the other hand, was a modernist writer who addressed women's issues in her novels but did not specifically advocate for women's rights in the same way as Wollstonecraft.
In conclusion, Mary Wollstonecraft's work significantly impacted the women's rights movement by applying the revolutionary doctrines of the rights of men to include women. Her ideas paved the way for later feminists and contributed to the gradual progress of gender equality in society. Therefore, option C is correct.
The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
The author whose writings applied the revolutionary doctrines of the rights of men to include women was
a. Millicent Fawcett.
b. Emmeline Pankhurst.
c. Mary Wollstonecraft.
d. Virginia Wolfe.
Know more about Women's rights here :
https://brainly.com/question/28015440
#SPJ11
What did the Eighteenth Amendment state? (SSUSH16b)
a. Alcohol was prohibited
b. Women had the right to vote
c. Presidential terms would begin in January
d. Senators would be elected directly by the constituent
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the United States would often engage in indirect conflict by each providing military support to opposing sides of a civil war located in a third state. These were examples of what kind of war
Answer:
The type of war you are referring to is called a **proxy war**. It is a conflict between two states or non-state actors where neither entity directly engages in combat with the other. Instead, they use third parties to do so on their behalf¹. During the Cold War, both the Soviet Union and the United States used this tactic to engage in indirect conflict by each providing military support to opposing sides of a civil war located in a third state².
These were examples of proxy wars. In a proxy war, two or more major powers support different sides of an ongoing conflict, usually through military aid, training, or financial support, without directly engaging in combat against each other.
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the United States would often engage in indirect conflict by each providing military support to opposing sides of a civil war located in a third state.
This allows the powers to exert influence and achieve their strategic objectives without risking direct conflict and its potential consequences.
To know more about proxy war refer here
https://brainly.in/question/2368723#
#SPJ11
On what grounds did the Cherokees challenge the Indian Removal Act before the Supreme Court in the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia in 1831
The Cherokees challenged the Indian Removal Act before the Supreme Court in the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia on the grounds that they were a sovereign nation and therefore not subject to state laws, including the Indian Removal Act.
The Cherokees challenged the Indian Removal Act before the Supreme Court on the grounds that they were a sovereign nation and had the right to self-governance, and that the Act violated their rights established by treaties with the United States.
In the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Cherokee Nation argued that they were a sovereign nation, meaning they had the authority to govern themselves and make their own laws. They believed that the Indian Removal Act, which aimed to force Native American tribes to relocate west of the Mississippi River, violated their rights as a sovereign nation.
Additionally, the Cherokees pointed to treaties they had previously established with the United States government, such as the Treaty of Hopewell (1785) and the Treaty of Holston (1791). These treaties recognized the Cherokee Nation's sovereignty and established boundaries for their lands. The Cherokee Nation argued that the Indian Removal Act violated these treaties and was therefore unconstitutional.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" and not a sovereign nation. As a result, the court decided that it did not have jurisdiction over the case, and the Indian Removal Act was not directly challenged.
To Know more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11