Answer: Yes&No depends on the kind of government we are trying to become.
Explanation:
one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws
Answer:
One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
Martin Luther King Jr. said that.
Brainly which ratifies a proposed amendment to the constitution? the house the senate the state legislatures the supreme court.
Answer:
the state legislatures
In which case would it be more dangerous to the passengers, if the cars crashed into each other and stopped right at the collision site, or if they bounced off of each other
It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.
I hope this helps! :)
Roscoe Pound, Dean of Harvard Law School from 1916 to 1936 said, “The law must be stable but it must not stand still.” One way to interpret his meaning is that a _____.
system of law must have a method to change the laws as often as possible
system of law that is designed to adapt to society through principles such as common law and precedent is a stronger system
system of laws that are inconsistent and change often is a healthy system
system of laws must have a method to make sure that laws do not change often
system of laws that is designed to adapt through principles such as common law and precedent is not a stable system
Answer:system of law that is designed to adapt to society through principles such as common law and precedent is a stronger system
Explanation:
tell me if you need an Explanation:
A group of high school students decide to hold a rally during school hours to protest cuts in the state's education budget. They march through classrooms, recruiting students to join the rally. Would the Tinker standard support the students' expression of their opinions?
A.
Yes, because students deserve a say in their own education.
B.
No, because political debates have no place in public schools.
C.
Yes, because the First Amendment guarantees the right to peaceably assemble.
D.
No, because it disrupts school activities.
Answer:
D
No; because it distrupts school activities
Any activity done by the high school students for the expression of their opinions that disrupts the school activities would not be supported by the Tinker standard, as it violates the constitutional rights of the high school.
What are the constitutional rights?
Rights which are awarded to a person by the virtue of the American constitution are his constitutional rights.
Expression of opinion refers to the voluntary activity done by an individual or a group to express their views regarding some activities that are being held against their likings.
In case the students undertake rallies for expressing their opinions, it is their right to do so, but doing this inside the school campus and during school hours violates the constitutional rights of the school.
Hence, option D holds true that Tinker standard would not support the activity of students expressing their opinions, as it overlaps the constitutional rights of the high school.
Learn more about constitutional rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/15625659
#SPJ2
when convicted of multiple crimes, what kind of sentences must be served separately?
Answer:
When a defendant has been convicted of two or more crimes, the judge must determine how the defendant must serve his sentences. A concurrent sentence is a term of imprisonment equal to the length of the longest sentence. A consecutive sentence requires a defendant to serve two or more sentences back to back.
Explanation:
Hopes this helps! :)
The executive branch, headed by the (fill in blank)
includes numerous executive departments that carry out or enforce laws passed by (fill in blank).
The executive branch is headed by the president. They enforce laws passed by Congress.
The president is in control of things like the army and is in control of enforcing laws passed by congress.
I hope this helps! :)
"How are both physical evidence and testimonial evidence used in a court of law?"
Answer:
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath; also known as direct evidence or prima facie evidence. Physical evidence is any object or material that is relevant in a crime; also known as indirect evidence. Examples are hair, fiber, fingerprints, documents, blood, soil, drugs, toolmarks, impressions, glass.
What is the law that explains how matter on earth is conserved, even if it changes form and composition?.
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Explanation:
Carlos is using a precipitin test at a crime scene. When he applies the antiserum, a cloudy ring forms. What can Carlos MOST likely conclude from
this reaction?
ОА.
He has found animal blood.
Ов,
He has found human blood.
He has found animal hair.
OD
He has found human hair.
The Second Amendment is an important part of the Constitution. For this assignment you will need to read the Second Amendment and the secondary source Know Your Rights: A Guide to the United States Constitution to help you answer the following prompt:
“Does the text of the Second Amendment mean that the right to 'bear arms' is unlimited?”
As you prepare to answer this prompt you should follow the format provided below.
Paragraph 1 - Analyze the text of the Second Amendment for yourselves. In order to analyze you should look at each word in the amendment and decide how each part of the amendment relates to the prompt.
Paragraph 2 - Summarize and cite the ideas and information from the secondary sources to provide support for your conclusion in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 3 – Summarize and cite the ideas and information in the secondary sources that go against your conclusions in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 4 – Write an analysis about the strength of the arguments that support or counter their own opinions. You will need to provide an explanation of your thinking about which opinions are stronger by citing specific textual evidence out of the primary and secondary sources.
Answer:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime
to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of
handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms
unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin
the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing
requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in
the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the
use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed
the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second
Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and
that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that
firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for
Explanation:
What is domestic law.
What amendment allowed women to vote.
Answer:
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Explanation:
Which law or act requires inmates to exhaust all internal administrative grievance procedures before they can file a civil rights case in federal court
Which is not an example of an employee benefit?
A. Paid time off for holidays
B. Paid time off for illness
C. Health insurance
D. Mandatory pay raises
Answer:
D. Mandatory pay raises
Explanation:
Employee benefits are additional benefits applied with current wage salaries. Answer D is not extra addition onto the current salary, so D is your best option.
Hope that helped you. :)
Can I take a Florida Permit exam with the consent of a parent who has a California license?
What is disorderly conduct?
Answer:
anger violence and not cooperating
Explanation:
look it up
choose the correct succession of low to high altitude clouds that signify a warm front.
Answer:
wheres the answer choices?
Explanation:
the pythagorean theorem is a special case of the law of cosines
Answer:
The Pythagorean Theorem is a special case of the law of cosines, a2 + b2 - 2*a*b*cos (theta) = c2 because cos (theta) = 0 when the angle is a 90 degree or right angle. We also learned that the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem is true as
research methods in criminal justice and criminology
Answer:Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology connects key concepts to real field research and practices using contemporary examples and recurring ...
Explanation: Research methods in criminal justice and criminology / Callie M. ... research methods, especially as they pertain to criminology and the criminal.
983 pages
The impeachment process is a check on the president by what branch of government?
a. Judicial
b. Executive
c. Legislative
d. Supreme Court
ole in shaping
Answer:
C........................
In a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
Answer:
Answer:
safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
Explanation:
The sum of the forces on either side is the same, the only difference is the radius of curvature and speed.
Also given that r_1= smaller radius
r_2= larger radius curve
r_2= 2r_1..............i
let u be the speed of larger radius curve
now, \sum F = \frac{mv^2}{r_1} =\frac{mu^2}{r_2}∑F=
r
1
mv
2
=
r
2
mu
2
................ii
form i and ii we can write
v^2= \frac{1}{2} u^2v
2
=
2
1
u
2
⇒u= √2 v
therefore, safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is false that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: https://brainly.com/question/10377896
______ is a court order permitting a local court officer, such as a sheriff, to seize the debtor's property.
Answer:
An execution
Explanation:
This court order allows the Sheriff's office to collect money or property to get your judgement paid.
A FIRETWUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court hold that the defendant has the right to counsel during the course of any police interrogation
In Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment bars the police from initiating any interrogation of a defendant who has been formally charged and who has requested the right to counsel.
What is a court decision?
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
The court's decision of who won the case.
The plurality opinion of most justices on the Court.
Answer:
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
what can congress do if the supreme court declares a law unconstitutional
Answer:
The law is nullified
Explanation:
Congress can get around a Court ruling by passing a new law or changing a law ruled unconstitutional.
Congress can modify the law or create a new one. This way they can dodge the unconstitutional declaration.
I hope this helps! :)
What is the justification for continuing to allow lawsuits for interference with private property.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Which election cycle is used to select the nominee for a political party as their representative for President?
a. Mid-Term Elections
b. Primary Elections
c. General Election
d. Special Elections
Answer:
B- primary elections
Explanation:
As Commander In Chief, the President has the ability to do which of the following?
a. Give executive Orders
b. Decide the use of the military
c. Helps make treaties
d. Grants commutations, amnesty, and pardons
Answer:
all of them
Explanation: