Determine if a relation is a function {(-1,5), (2, 7), (-3,2), (-1, 1)}

answer: 60 × 100 = 600

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$66

Step-by-step explanation:

Money saved after sale= 60% of $110

= 60/100 ×$110

= $66

The student made $100 in week 8.

An expression is a way of writing a statement with more than two variables or numbers with operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Example: 2 + 3x + 4y = 7 is an expression.

We have,

Amount earned from the first week to 6 weeks.

110, 100, 90, 110, 100, 90

We see that,

Every 3 weeks the amount gets repeated.

So,

7th week = 110

8th week = 100

Thus,

The amount earned in week 8 is $100.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ2

Answer:

show the screen clearer !

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x³ - 4x² + 2x + 4 = 0

Here's how I solved this:

You start off by rewriting the zeros into factors:

1 - √3    →    x = 1 - √3    →    (x - 1 - √3)

  2        →    x = 2           →    (x - 2)

1 + √3   →    x = 1 + √3   →    (x - 1 + √3)

Now you want to multiply the factors together:

     (x - 1 - √3) · (x - 2) · (x - 1 + √3)

- Multiply the first two factors together -

                (x - 1 - √3) · (x - 2)

                              ↓

    (x · x - x · 2 - √3 · x + √3 · 2 - x + 2)

   - Combine like terms and simplify -

    (x · x - x · 2 - √3 · x + √3 · 2 - x + 2)

                              ↓

          (x² - 3x - √3 · x + 2√3 + 2)

      - Now multiply the third factor -

   (x² - 3x - √3 · x + 2√3 + 2)(x - 1 + √3)

                              ↓

(x² · x + x² · √3 - x² - 3x · x - 3x · √3 + 3x - √3 · xx - √3 · x · √3 +√3 · x + 2 · √3 · x + 2 · √3 · √3 - 2 · √3 + 2x + 2 · √3 - 2)

                              ↓

(x³ + x² · √3 - x² - 3x² - 3x · √3 + 3x - √3 + 3x - √3 * x² - x · 3 + √3 · x + 2 · √3 · x + 2 · 3 - 2 × √3 + 2x + 2 √3 - 2)

   - Combine like terms and simplify -

(x³ + x² · √3 - x² - 3x² - 3x · √3 + 3x - √3 + 3x - √3 * x² - x · 3 + √3 · x + 2 · √3 · x + 2 · 3 - 2 × √3 + 2x + 2 √3 - 2)

                              ↓

                 x³ - 4x² + 2x + 4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And there we get our solution: x³ - 4x² + 2x + 4  

The circumference of a circle with diameter of 98 in. is about 308 in.

We know the diameter. Using the diameter, we can find the circumference.

Circumference = 2πr

Therefore, the circumference of a circle with diameter of 98 in. is about 308 in.

Hoped this helped.

[tex]BrainiacUser1357[/tex]

Using the combination formula and the probability concept, it is found that there is a 0.1259 = 12.59% probability that she gets at least two red ones, given that she gets at least one green one.

Combination formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by:

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

Desired outcomes:

Hence:

[tex]D = C_{3,2}C_{3,1}{C_{10,1}} = \frac{3!}{2!1!} \times \frac{3!}{1!2!} \times \frac{10!}{1!9!} = 90[/tex]

Total outcomes:

Four marbles are taken from a set of 13, hence:

[tex]T = C_{13,4} = \frac{13!}{4!9!} = 715[/tex]

Then, the probability is:

[tex]p = \frac{D}{T} = \frac{90}{715} = 0.1259[/tex]

0.1259 = 12.59% probability that she gets at least two red ones, given that she gets at least one green one.

To learn more about the use of the combination formula and the probability concept, you can check combination formula and the probability concept,

Answer:

[tex]y = \ -\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x \ + \ 9[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the reference line is y = 2x - 3, with a slope of  [tex]m_{reference} \ = \ 2[/tex].

We know that two non-vertical lines are perpendicular if the slope of one line is the negative reciprocal of the slope of the other. In other words, both slopes can be multiplied together to yield -1. Let [tex]m_{1}[/tex] be the slope of one line and [tex]m_{2}[/tex] be the slope of its corresponding perpendicular line,

[tex]m_{1} \ \times \ m_{2} \ = \ -1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{or} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m_{1} \ = \ \displaystyle\frac{-1}{m_{2}}[/tex].

Thus,

[tex]m_{reference} \ \times \ m_{perpendicular} \ = \ -1 \\ \\ \-\hspace{2.26cm} m_{perpendicular} \ = \ \displaystyle\frac{-1}{m_{reference}} \\ \\ \-\hspace{2.26cm} m_{perpendicular} \ = \ \displaystyle\frac{-1}{2} \\ \\ \-\hspace{2.26cm} m_{perpendicular} \ = \ -\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, using the point-slope form for the equation of a line passing through the point [tex](x_{1}, \ y_{1})[/tex] is [tex]y \ - \ y_{1} \ = \ m(x \ - \ x_{1})[/tex]. Given that the perpendicular line passes through the point [tex](8,\ 5)[/tex], the equation of the perpendicular line is

[tex]y \ - \ 5 \ = \ -\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}(x \ - \ 8) \\ \\ y \ - \ 5 \ = \ -\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x \ + \ 4 \\ \\ \-\hspace{0.85cm} y \ = \ -\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x \ + \ 9[/tex]

Answer:

6 (20 + c) > 16

Step-by-step explanation:

the sum of the number and 20 is 20 + c. so you multiply that equation by 6 giving you 6 (20 + c)

Answer:

19

Step-by-step explanation:

in question given ,x = 2, y = 3, z = 5 in this way

(3x+3z+2w) and find the value of w . according to given values and put

Answer:

  4 +30/w . . . . for any w≠0

Step-by-step explanation:

The given constraints resolve to 2 equations in 4 unknowns. There are an infinite number of solutions.

The ratio requirement means ...

  (x -y +z)/2 = (y -z +2w)/3 = (2x +z -10)/5

Considering the first equality, we can multiply by 6 and subtract the right side.

  3(x -y +z) -2(y -z +2w) = 0   ⇒   3x -5y +5z -4w = 0

Considering the first and last expressions, we can multiply by 10 and subtract the right side.

  5(x -y +z) -2(2x +z -10) = 0   ⇒   x -5y +3z = -20

These two equations have solutions ...

  x = 10 -z +2w

  y = 6 + 0.4z +0.4w

Using these expressions in the ratio of interest, we have ...

  (3x +3z -2w) : w = (3(10 -z +2w) +3z -2w) : w = (30 -3z +6w +3z -2w) : w

  = (30 +4w) : w

Expressed as a mixed number, the ratio of interest is ...

  (30 +4w)/w = 4 +30/w . . . . an infinite number of solutions

__

For positive values of w that are divisors of 30, there are 8 possible values:

   (w, ratio) = (1, 34), (2, 19), (3, 14), (5, 10), (6, 9), (10, 7), (15, 6), (30, 5)

_____

Check

It might be interesting to substitute the expressions for x and y into our original equation(s).

  (x -y +z)/2 = ((10 -z +2w) -(6 +0.4z +0.4w) +z)/2 = (2 -0.2z +0.8w)

  (y -z +2w)/3 = ((6 +0.4z +0.4w) -z +2w)/3 = (2 -0.2z +0.8w)

  (2x +z -10)/5 = (2(10 -z +2w) +z -10)/5 = (2 -0.2z +0.8w)

All of these expressions are identical, as they should be.

well, let's take a peek, hmmm the length is hmmm, how much is five times "x"? well 5 * x or just 5x, how about four more than that? well, just 5x + 4.

we know the width is hmmm how much is three times "x"? 3*x or just 3x, how about 2 less than that?  3x - 2.

Check the picture below.

Answer:

↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑^

Given: JK = 3x - 5, KL = 2x + 1

The sum of the segments JK and KL will equal the length of the segment JL = 16

So we can write:

3x - 5 + (2x + 1) = 16 [JK + KL = JL]

Collect terms, solve for x:

5x - 4 = 16

5x = 20

x = 4

JK = 3x - 5 = 3*4 - 5 = 12 - 5 = 7

Ans: 7

Answer:

$1,251

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula: [tex]A = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

A = final amount

P = initial principal balance

r = interest rate

n = number of times interest applied per time period

t = number of time periods elapsed

Plug the values into the formula; solve:

[tex]r = \frac{r}{100}[/tex]

[tex]r = \frac{1.4}{100}[/tex]

[tex]r = 0.014[/tex]

0.014 rate per year

[tex]A = Pe^{rt}[/tex]

[tex]A = 1,200.00^{(2.71828)}^{(0.014)(3)}[/tex]

[tex]A = $1,251.47\\[/tex]

1,251.47 is 1251 rounded because the first value after the decimal point is not greater or equal to 5.

Answer:

1251

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

Here m = 1 , then

y = x + c ← is the partial equation

To find c substitute (4, 1 ) into the partial equation

1 = 4 + c ⇒ c = 1 - 4 = - 3

y = x - 3 ← equation of line

Answer:Hi

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 1600m^2

Its a square so all sides are equal. So...

400m * 400m

= 1600m^2

Answer:

i think D. All of the above would generate a sphere is answer

Answer:

it's 1

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps 1

The scale factor is: 1/5.

The missing sides of figure B are: 2.4, 3.6, and 4.

Scale factor = dimension of new figure / dimension of original figure

The polygons given are shown in the diagram attached below.

Figure A is the original figure

Figure B is the new figure.

x, y, and z has been used to mark the missing sides of figure B.

One dimension of original figure = 15

Corresponding dimension of the new figure = 3

Scale factor = new/original = 3/15

Scale factor = 1/5

To find the missing sides of figure B, multiply each corresponding side lengths of Figure A by the scale factor:

x = 12 × 1/5 = 2.4

y = 18 × 1/5 = 3.6

z = 20 × 1/5 = 4

In summary:

The scale factor is: 1/5.

The missing sides of figure B are: 2.4, 3.6, and 4.

Learn more about scale factor on:

https://brainly.com/question/2826496

Answer:

Solution: g > 9

Interval Notation: (9 , ∞)

Step-by-step explanation:

-3 * (6-2g) > 4g

-18 + 6g > 4g

6g - 4g > 18

2g > 18

g > 9

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

→ Do the 8.2 × 5

41

→ Minus the answer from the sum of the values

41 - ( 6 + 10 + 7 + 12 ) = 6

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Ti-83 graph proves it.

Answer:

x=13

Step-by-step explanation:

8x-20=4x+32

start by moving the terms,

8x-4x=32+20

combine

4x=52

divide each side by 4

x=13

Answer:13

Step-by-step explanation:

37-3.5=33.5

33.5/2.5=13.4

since it ask for the whole number, it will be 13

Answer:

Actually, Corresponding angles are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

They are only supplementary in the special case where they are both 90°

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know that measure of corresponding angles are equal. So, corresponding angle are congruent to each other

Answer:

3+3+3+3

Step-by-step explanation:

Hopefully I didn't get confused

3^4 vs 3+3+3+3 vs (3^2)(3^2) vs 3x3x3x3

Well the best way to do it is to do each

3^4=81

3+3+3+3=12

3^(2+2)=81

3x3x3x3=81

Therefore 3+3+3+3 is not equilvilent

Answer:

y = | x - 3 | is graphed on the attachment below ↓

Step-by-step explanation:

If you ever need an equation graphed, here's a useful site called Desmos that can do that really well and for free.